Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Iglesias-Benitez, 1st Cir. (1992)
United States v. Iglesias-Benitez, 1st Cir. (1992)
September 1, 1992
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
___________________
No. 92-1837
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
LUIS ERNESTO IGLESIAS-BENITEZ,
Defendant, Appellant.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Raymond L. Acosta, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
__________________
Per Curiam.
__________
a
district
court
__________________
Luis Ernesto Iglesias Benitez appeals from
order
affirming
trial.
the
magistrate-judge's
that follow,
we affirm.
______
On May
6, 1992,
participating
in a
appellant was
broad-based
distribute multi-kilo
indicted on
conspiracy
to
quantities of heroin.
charges of
import
and
In particular,
defendant
of
$150,000
heroin
in
for
Hong
purchase
Kong,
to
of
be
He is charged in
about
3.5
imported
and
count twelve,
in
And he is charged
hearing was
1992.
held before
the magistrate-judge on
defense
proffered
release
counsel,
in
accepting
defendant's
on bail.
The
June 4,
into
evidence
thirteen
page
the
testimony
cross-motion
magistrate-judge also
for
accepted into
father of
supports.
five
old, a native of
children, at
The witnesses
least
Puerto Rico
three of
he proffered included
whom
he
his mother,
brother-in-law,
common
law
magistrate
former common-law
wives.
This
as proof
of
evidence
and two
was
accepted
strong family
employment as
current
by
and community
a grocer in
the
ties.
a store
he
he claimed
wife
appearance at
a custodian,
his
arrest that
investigation
When
in
he
and was
was
target
planning to
of the
grand
surrender, but
jury
did not.
allegedly
of
his
explained
murdered
to
Drug
brother's
Enforcement
handgun.
He
Administration
by a third
person
did not
____________________
to inclement weather.
The hearing had previously been
postponed several times to allow defendant to obtain counsel
of his choice.
-3-
have a license for the gun and also faces charges for illegal
possession of a firearm.
In
addition
defendant
is
suspended
to
See 18 U.S.C.
___
the
currently
sentence
federal
on
for
922(g)(1).2
charges
probation
felony
against
from
violation
three-year
of
statutory rape of
defendant is
state
Another
a teenage girl,
him,
of the child
was
that
a state investigation
magistrate-judge
found
that
despite
defendant's
no condition
or combination
community.
The district
of conditions
appearance and
court affirmed
the safety
will
of
the detention
review:
deference to
"independent review,
tempered
by a
degree of
United States
_____________
____________________
2. Defendant was indicted on July 22, 1992, for violation of
18 U.S.C.
922(g)(1) (unlawful for convicted felon to
knowingly receive a firearm which has been transported in
interstate commerce). The indictment identifies the handgun
as a .9mm Smith and Wesson semi-automatic pistol.
See note
___
3, infra.
_____
-4-
v.
Tortora, 922
_______
"respect
F.2d
... to the
880, 882
lower court's
abuse-of-discretion
stopping short of
(1st Cir.
1990).
We give
factual determinations,"
clear-error
plenary or de novo
__ ____
standards,
review."
Id.
__
but
at 883;
United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810, 814 (1st Cir. 1990).
_____________
_______
The
government
bore the
burden
of
proving that
no
Palmer-Contreras,
________________
835
F.2d
15,
17 (1st
United States v.
_____________
Cir.
1987)
(per
curiam). To meet
a preponderance
of
evidence to prove
the evidence
Cir.
1991).
The
to
required to
dangerousness;
prove a
risk
of
grand
jury
indictment,
however,
of ten
804
F.2d
157, 163
presumption
of
arose
conditions
defendant's appearance
(1st
and "the
United States
_____________
Cir. 1986).
that
will
See
___
no
Thus
"condition
reasonably
safety of any
assure"
a
or
the
other person
3142(e), (f).
-5-
actual sentence he
stands
States v. Moss,
______
____
prediction
assigned
of
lesser
sentence
magistrate-judge
"ethereal"
actually
that
affect
at 337, we
the
While
weight
______
analysis
here
presumption's force.
is
too
Especially
defendant is
may
defendant's
to diminish the
in light of his
United
______
to rebut
the
841(b)(1)(A)(i).
statutory
presumption,
defendant
is not true in
United States v.
______________
F.2d
disappear entirely.
evidentiary weight,
defendant's
"paradigm."
at 383.
Id. at 380-81.
__
case
the
Palmer-Contreras, 835
________________
Its
dependent
the
F.2d at
remaining force is
Id. at
__
amount
resembles
in 18 U.S.C.
It
on
how
congressional
18; Jessup,
______
757
Palmer-
_______
Contreras, 835 F.2d at 18; O'Brien, 895 F.2d at 815.
_________
_______
The evidence offeredby defendant did little to mitigate
-6-
The charges
in
within
the
indictment
place
defendant
squarely
the
to escape to other
sentences".
2d Session at 20,
News at
3203.
98-225, 98th
reprinted in U.S.
____________
Defendant is
supply
large quantities
abroad
in connection
of cash
with
visible
access
years,
an
to finance
a multi-person
spanned
to other
charged with
agreeing to
drug purchases
conspiracy
that
resources
which
might finance
interest
in
real
estate,
several
automobiles, and
according to
Contreras,
_________
financial condition"
proper
organization
on
at
18 (although
defendants were
for
which
grounds
they
worked
where
only
detention
narcotics
appeared
to
have
community ties,
faithful appearance
the
offered
evidence of strong
security, and
government's case
against
family
pointed to
his
defendant is
strong and
he
-7-
In light of defendant's
the
magistrate-judge's
1412, 1416-17
decision
that
defendant
(1st Cir.
1991) (court
did not
err in
evidence showed
defendant's connection
could absorb
defendant presented no
of the community.
Congress has
was indicted
involved and
drug
and
one felony
convincing
released
on the
convictions
incentives
inclination to remain
See
___
that
he would
United States v.
_____________
continue to
fact that
and
narcotics crime
released, would
based
here.
evidence
on bail.
conviction for a
his demonstrated
trade despite
parole
defendant's possession of
-8-
were
he
already done
supervision").
a gun
is clear
continue
be involved with
they had
in the
at the time
In
so "despite
addition,
of his
arrest
a probationer,
and
his self-professed
knowledge
disdain
circumstance
claimed
for
wholly
the
undermines
willingness to
submit
the conditions
and "can
flaw
which "takes
on
about
defendant
the
conditions
the
...
of
law.
of
This
defendant's
variety of
conditions
Most
on the
defendant's good
be too easily
circumvented," a
great significance
suggests
the
value
to a
proposed "hinge
faith compliance,"
forthcoming."
authority
that
where ...
good
faith
at 886-87.
proposed,
like the
little
will
be
In any event,
evidence
he
____________________
3. This conclusion is further buttressed by testimony given
at defendant's second
detention hearing, following his
indictment for possession of the firearm.
The magistratejudge's detention order there recites a government agent's
testimony that the gun was loaded when it, and additional
ammunition, were seized from defendant's control. Defendant
reportedly said he needed the gun because one Jose Alberto
Cosme had attempted to kill him.
The agent testified to
information that defendant is a suspect in the murder of Jose
Alberto Cosme, and currently holds "a strong control on
narcotic distribution" in a public housing project. Though
we rarely consider materials which were not presented to the
court directly below, both parties have referred to the
subsequent indictment in their briefs, the magistrate-judge's
opinion there is part of the court's records, and defendant
presented
of
correlation
strong
with
family
the
and community
question
of
the
ties,
has
"no
safety
of
the
no combination
defendant's
community.
appearance
and
the
will reasonably
safety
of
the
-10-