Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Bay Financial Corp v. The Newport Inn, 1st Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff, Loli V. Gregor, appealed the district court's December 19, 1991 memorandum and order ruling for the defendants, The Newport Inn Joint Venture and Bay Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's memorandum and order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Bay Financial Corp v. The Newport Inn, 1st Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff, Loli V. Gregor, appealed the district court's December 19, 1991 memorandum and order ruling for the defendants, The Newport Inn Joint Venture and Bay Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's memorandum and order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-09-28 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 92-1097

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff, Loli V. Gregor, appealed the district court's December 19, 1991 memorandum and order ruling for the defendants, The Newport Inn Joint Venture and Bay Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's memorandum and order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views3 pages

    Bay Financial Corp v. The Newport Inn, 1st Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff, Loli V. Gregor, appealed the district court's December 19, 1991 memorandum and order ruling for the defendants, The Newport Inn Joint Venture and Bay Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's memorandum and order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    USCA1 Opinion

    September 28, 1992

    [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

    ____________________
    No. 92-1097
    BAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ET AL.,
    Debtors,
    __________
    LOLI V. GREGOR, D/B/A
    HSIN-MEI, CO.,
    Plaintiff, Appellant,
    v.
    THE NEWPORT INN JOINT VENTURE AND
    BAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES,
    Defendants, Appellees.
    ____________________
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    [Hon. Edward F. Harrington, U.S. District Judge]
    ___________________
    ____________________
    Before
    Breyer, Chief Judge,
    ___________
    Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
    ____________________
    and Cyr, Circuit Judge.
    _____________

    ____________________

    Loli V. Gregor on brief pro se.


    ______________
    Jack Weinberg and Graubard, Mollen, Horowitz, Pomeranz & Shap
    _____________
    _____________________________________________
    on brief for appellees, The Newport Inn Joint Venture and
    Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries.
    ____________________
    ____________________

    Per Curiam.
    __________
    affirmed
    ________

    for

    The judgment of

    the reasons

    stated

    in

    December 19, 1991 memorandum and order.

    the district court is


    the district

    court's

    -2-

    You might also like