USCA1 Opinion

March 10, 1993

United States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
For the First Circuit
____________________
No. 92-2083
JORGE CRUZ,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
NORBERTO MOLINA LUGO,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Stahl, Circuit Judge,
_____________
Aldrich and Coffin, Senior Circuit Judges.
_____________________
____________________

Raul Barrera Morales for appellant.

____________________
Federico Lora Lopez for appellee.
___________________
____________________
____________________

Per Curiam.
__________
of a carefully
court

rendered

plaintiff's
exclusion
that

In this appeal, plaintiff seeks review

and fully developed decision of

after a

lease had
of plaintiff

bench

from the

that defendant

amount of sixty dollars

After

been violated by

plaintiff had suffered no

occurrence, but

trial.

the district
ruling

defendant's illegal

premises, the
damages as a

court found

result of that

had suffered damages

for past due rent and

housekeeping.

The

in the

seven hundred

dollars for exterminating services made necessary

plaintiff's inadequate

that

because of

court also

found

that certain

other claims brought by

plaintiff were lacking

in any substance.
Plaintiff's objections

on appeal are based

challenges to factual determinations

course,

are

accepted

erroneous."
reviewed

See
___

in

making

Fed. R.

the record on

plaintiff, we

unless

on his

of the court, which, of

demonstrated to

Civ. P. 52(a).
appeal and the

be

Having

"clearly
carefully

objections raised by

are not persuaded that the court clearly erred

the determinations

at

issue.

Accordingly,

affirm based on the well-reasoned district court opinion.

Affirmed.
Affirmed
________

Double costs to appellee.

Double costs to appellee
________________________

-22

we