Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Castillo-Soriano, 1st Cir. (1995)
United States v. Castillo-Soriano, 1st Cir. (1995)
May 5, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-2174
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
MARTIN CASTILLO-SORIANO,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Per Curiam.
__________
Soriano appeals from
that his
mandatory
district
Defendant-appellant Martin
the imposition of sentence.
for
with the
his offense,
CastilloHe argues
statutory
and that
the
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
5C1.2,
for a
We disagree.
As
we
read the
record,
the
district court
authority to impose a
was
lesser sentence
but
determined that
given
the
punishment.
a sixty-month sentence
statutory
See
___
factors
18
U.S.C.
of
was appropriate
deterrence
3553(a).
and
just
Under
the
See
___
lacks jurisdiction
applicable
appeal
27.1.
guideline
to
review a
sentencing range).
sentence within
the
Accordingly, the
of jurisdiction.
See Loc. R.
___