Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Miller v. Kennebec County, 1st Cir. (1995)
Miller v. Kennebec County, 1st Cir. (1995)
_______________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam.
__________
the
district
action.
court's
Aaron J. Miller
1915(d)
appeals pro se
___ __
dismissal
of
his
from
1983
complaint filed in
__
forma pauperis if "the action
_____ ________
U.S.C.
1915(d).
is frivolous or malicious." 28
R. Civ.
render a complaint
at 331.
alleged
is also subject
are
'clearly
that
'delusional.'"
baseless,'
are
necessarily
1915(d). Id.
___
to dismissal
encompassing
'fantastic,'
Hernandez, 112
_________
(citations omitted).
under
category
'fanciful,'
Denton v.
______
to state a
does not
allegations
(1992)
P. 12(b)(6)
Failure
A complaint
1915(d) if
(1989).
law." Neitzke v.
_______
S. Ct.
and
1728, 1733
district court's
1915(d)
occasioned
"When
deprivation
by
random
and
of
property
unauthorized
interest
conduct
by
is
state
the adequacy
Lowe v.
____
In reliance upon
-2-
that
was
claim.
The
specifically
because
Magistrate
noted
that
Plaintiff can
of Miller's
Judge's
"an
file a
due process
Recommended
adequate
remedy
state court
Decision
does
exist
suit to
recover
Magistrate
Judge's
his
objection
Decision,
Miller
adequate
post-deprivation
disputed
the
Magistrate
Miller's deprivation
unauthorized"
"challenging
to
the
failed
to
remedy
exists.
Judge's
implicit
conduct.
contest
Miller
that
an
Instead,
he
finding
that
claimed
that
he
was
failed, however,
identify the
customs"
to
to
which
he
referred.
Miller
specific "ordinances
Nor
do
the
and
factual
deficiencies
of his
due
process
G i v e n
t h e
notifying Miller of
claim, and
Miller's
claim pursuant to
1915(d).
929 F.2d
1915(d) dismissal of
-3-
complaint
for failure
report notified
to state
plaintiff
a claim
of complaint's
where magistrate's
deficiencies
and
Miller's Fourth
based
upon an
Amendment
claim.
Therefore,
the
"indisputably
meritless
legal theory,"
of state
Fourth
These
Amendment
home and
seized his
facts, if proved,
claim.
The
could state
allegation
that
a
the
Miller's
"Judicial
warrant
legal theory
cannot
serve
baseless.
as an
absolute
bar
approval of
to
the
1983
335 (1986).
Since the district court failed to address Miller's
Fourth Amendment claim, and since that claim is not meritless
on its face, we
-4-
dismissal order.
We remand the
limited
process,
to
and
case for
the
Fourth
for
the filing of
Amendment
further
a redacted
claim,
proceedings
for
not
complaint
service
of
inconsistent
herewith.
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.
_______________________________________________
-5-