Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Weber v. Weferling, 1st Cir. (1995)
Weber v. Weferling, 1st Cir. (1995)
Weber v. Weferling, 1st Cir. (1995)
____________________
No. 95-1024
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
MARIE WEFERLING,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
and
appellee.
____________________
on
brief
____________________
Per Curiam.
___________
Plaintiff
contends
that deliberate
that
(1)
he
successfully
advised
prescribed
condition after
he
defendant
Minnesota
Triamcinolone for
doctor
had
plaintiff's skin
hydrocortisone,
which,
once again,
exacerbated plaintiff's
skin condition.
We
court that
agree with
fact
for
while
plaintiff
of
uncontradicted
hydrocortisone
stronger,
prescribing
to see a doctor.
who
prescribed
plaintiff's problem.
skin
genuine issue
has
more
risk
for
side
comfortable
doctor,
and district
Defendant's
Triamcinolone,
to raise any
trial.
feel
magistrate judge
plaintiff failed
material
effects.
the
for
she
Triamcinolone,
which
alleviated
the
advised
responsible
Triamcinolone,
delay
go and that
in
that his
scheduling
doctor's
appointment.
defendant's
Rather,
refusal
to
plaintiff's
heed
contention
plaintiff's
a past flare
was
that
warning
that
up or to
check
-3-
prescribed
Triamcinolone successfully
manifested deliberate
We
plaintiff's
knowledge
occasion
disagree.
record
that
before
treating
hydrocortisone
had
his
failed
eczema
on
nor
her
previous
rise
Such
See Watson
___ ______
v. Caton, 984 F.2d 537, 540 (1st Cir. 1993); Sires v. Berman,
_____
_____
______
834
F.2d 9,
13
plaintiff from a
(1st Cir.
1987).
remedy which
Defendant
had worked in
doctor.
but rather a
did not
bar
the past;
she
further step in
the management
elapsed
of plaintiff's problem.
before plaintiff
actually
saw the
doctor was
Affirmed.
________
-4-
not