Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Werme v. Merrill, 1st Cir. (1996)
Werme v. Merrill, 1st Cir. (1996)
_________________________
No. 95-1982
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
Defendants, Appellees.
_________________________
_________________________
Before
_________________________
Barnes, Bender & Boehm, Martin Bender, and Paula Werme, pro
_______________________ _____________
___________
se, on brief for appellants.
Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney
___________________
General,
and
Christopher P.
______________
_________________________
__________
*Of the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.
course
of this
bounds
inspectors
Day.
overstepped constitutional
We conclude, as
present at
the polls
on Election
I.
I.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The
Hampshire, as elsewhere,
dominate the
political scene.
group,
the Democratic
In
and Republican
Nevertheless, third
In New
parties
parties can
election one
such
statewide.
party primaries
(1986).
status by virtue of
retained that
candidates garnered
in subsequent elections.
Despite
party
recognition
and
ballot
status,
the
seemingly
unconnected
mishaps.1
Goaded
by
these
incidents,
____________________
1To
claims
cite
that
a few
one
of the
town
neglected
more
State; that,
refused
to
permit a
to
forward
the
the party
count
of
in another town,
bruited examples,
election officials,
659:14(I)
Democrat to
Ann.
(1994 Supp.),
change
her party
Paula
Werme,
registered
Libertarian,
requested
campaign
to
the
the
that
The selectmen
Secretary
of
State
and, failing
brought her
to
obtain
Invoking 42 U.S.C.
1983, Werme
She alleged
to
free
appointment of election
association, due
process,
and
rights
equal protection;
she
prayed that the court enjoin their enforcement; and she sought an
positions
on the
Republican
same basis
parties.
additional plaintiff.
motions
for
interest
in
Libertarian
the
challenged
of the
Party
summary judgment,
justified the
the
The
as members
efficient
concluded
management
small restriction
Democratic and
intervened as
that
the defendants'
of election
on the plaintiffs'
statutes entailed,
and
an
upheld New
activities
rights that
Hampshire's
statutory scheme.
II.
II.
The
summary
judgment
standard is
both
prosaic
and
____________________
registration and
in their
listed
party affiliations.
No
complaints were
familiar,
F.3d
see, e.g.,
___ ____
McCarthy v.
________
First,
We simply
the movant
grant
of
summary judgment
de
novo,
III.
III.
See
___
applying
the same
law.
legal
See Roche v.
___ _____
(1st Cir.
New
stuff.
town moderator
supervises Election
of other
the
votes
659:9.
election officials,
[cast]
including inspectors
in the
Id.
___
inspector for
for governor
Day activities.2
state
658:2.
appointed by
largest number of
at the
last previous
voters in
excess of
See id.
___ ___
2,000
If a
2While procedures
cities than in
Consequently,
procedures
in
towns,
we
refer throughout
omitting
to
particularized
the
election
references
to
fill
the
party.
lacuna by
See id.
___ ___
naming inspectors
In turn,
from
See id.
___ ___
658:25.
of that
clerks.
the ranks
to serve as ballot
Ballot
clerks exercise
no
discretion.
Their purely
in fact vote.
See id.
___ ___
In principle, a voter
on
an official
list
of
registered
Ballot
voters, the
ballot
clerk
voting
list.
While voters
may declare
or change
their party
Stat.
Ann.
654:7-a
&
654:7-b
(Supp.
1994),
election
handle such
matters.
654:8 (1986).
Every
recognized
political
party,
regardless
of
size
appoint a "challenger
or
previous
of voters" at
any
polling place who may stand within the guardrail to "see and hear
Id.
___
666:4.
____________________
3In
See
___
Exceptions are
support a party
that
did not have official existence when the voter declared her party
loyalty
(and
then
only
in the
primary
election
immediately
and
the
party's
rules
See id.
___ ___
allow
such
voter is
voter
to
counting
palsgrave
holding
See id.
___ ___
this
of votes.
is
election
held in
public, see
___
official positions
659:60.
process.
announces
See id.
___ ___
the
id.
___
may take
659:63,
part in
Although the
only persons
tallying ballots.
Once the
final results,
return is prepared by
see id.
___ ___
in
659:70, and
a formal
and forwarded to
the
public
See id.
___ ___
may inspect
the return.
Candidates may
Members of
call for
New Hampshire
laws
of a non-criminal
appeal
procedure
has
Moreover, election
for
IV.
IV.
nature for
Hampshire election
which no
already been
officials are
ballot tampering,
e.g., id.
____ ___
violations of New
specific statutory
provided."
subject to
falsifying returns,
Id.
___
665:7.
criminal penalties
or
the like.
666:1-3.
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
See,
___
A
A
it:
is of the essence
on
put
any restrictions
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 555 (1964); see also Wesberry
________
____
___ ____ ________
Sanders,
_______
376 U.S.
basic, are
illusory
1, 17
if
(1964) ("Other
the
right to
to
be fair
vote
undermined.").
See Burdick v.
___ _______
if some
sort of
Storer v. Brown,
______
_____
they are
the most
415 U.S.
is
there must be a
rights, even
v.
prescribe
the polls,
See Sugarman v.
___ ________
Dougall, 413 U.S. 634, 647 (1973); see also U.S. Const. Art. I,
_______
___ ____
4,
cl. 1 (directing
Places
and
Manner
that states
shall prescribe
"[t]he Times,
of
Elections
Senators
holding
for
and
Representatives").
unfettered.
At
rights
of their citizens.
Conn.,
_____
479 U.S.
208,
See Tashjian v.
___ ________
217 (1986).
regulation and
imposing
large.
Republican Party of
___________________
As courts
review
states'
impermissible abridgment
Amendment
of voters'
rights, the
to vote is
___
We do not agree.
The Supreme
and
instead has
adopted a
validity of election
2063;
Court has
eschewed a
hard-and-fast rule,
flexible framework
regulations.
for testing
S. Ct.
the
at
Under
the prescribed
framework,
regulation
encumbers
Consequently, a
the
and
Fourteenth
be
a challenged
Amendment
challenge to a
the plaintiff's
rights.
state election
of the
constitutionally protected
forward by
at 789;
court
scrutiny to
injury" to
rights and
of
court weighing a
asserted
First
the level
must
equilibrium").
attempt
to
achieve
sort
of
v.
that the
"constitutional
among
necessary
rights."
Id.
___
The Burdick
_______
Under
this
standard,
the
[the]
rigorousness
of
propriety of a state
challenged
regulation
Fourteenth Amendment
burdens First
rights.
Thus,
as
and
we
the regulation
must
compelling importance.
election
reasonable,
upon
the
law
provision
nondiscriminatory
First
and
imposes
restrictions
Fourteenth
only
Amendment
rights
of
voters,
the
State's
important
internal quotation
marks omitted).
B
B
Against this
specifics
of
backdrop,
the plaintiffs'
we
proceed
challenge.
to
consider
In performing
the
this
tamisage, we are cognizant that their claim is not that the state
misapplied New
staffing
the
Hampshire law,
polls
but, rather,
dictated
by
that
that the
law
method of
is
itself
constitutionally
challenge as
infirm.
facial
Thus,
attack
we
on the
regard
the
statutory
plaintiffs'
scheme
(and,
The
further
plaintiffs'
refinement.
scheme
like the
candidates
or as
sophisticated
popular parties
right
discriminates
challenge
do not
voters.
statutory
less successful
political
from ballot
inspectors and
that
free
against
political
them
on
access either
claim
restricting
ballot clerks
to
susceptible to
that the
Instead, their
they say
is
contend
members of
Libertarians,
level;
appoint election
their
They
directly prevents
parties,
facial
association,
the basis
of
is on
a more
the right
to the
as
to
two most
third parties of
and
their
invidiously
political
affiliation.
inspectors
Libertarian
Democrats
votes
are
counted.
In
the
to ensure that
plaintiffs'
to be trusted
view,
in this regard
because they
interests
and,
if
left
alone,
they
protection of Libertarian
will
likely
overlook
In
straw man.
There
be appointed to serve
as an election inspector or
F.3d 372,
376
(1st Cir.
certainly
includes the
1979).
right to
Although
have one's
to rest a
right to
ballot clerk.
v. Baronian, 590
________
the
vote
right to
vote
counted, see
___
United States v. Mosley, 238 U.S. 383, 386 (1915), nothing on the
_____________
______
face
of the
New Hampshire
statutes deprives
Libertarian Party
We
turn next to an
assessment of the
extent to which
rights of Libertarians.4
In the
first
nondiscriminatory,
place,
that is,
New
it
Hampshire's
does
not
regulation
differentiate
is
among
____________________
placed on
ballots
for
political
that
on the
rights of the
the rights
of voters
and
who
party's candidates.
parties purport
supporters,
Libertarian Party
"the
to represent
rights
of
voters
As
wish to
a
the
143 (1972)).
10
cast their
general matter,
the interests
and
and
of their
rights
of
Burdick,
_______
Republicans,
Democrats,
and
Libertarians.
Instead,
to appoint
election inspectors
regulation conditions
the right
and
a certain degree of
ballot clerks on
the
electoral
accomplishment
is
not
per
se
invidiously
discriminatory.
U.S.
(1974)
767,
781
discrimination
for
(holding
state
that
to grant
it
minor
is
not
parties
invidious
official
recognition,
but deny
them
the right
political parties
to
hold primaries
are so entitled).
So
even
here:
as
a source of election
exists,
Equality
of opportunity
situation.
The
fact
is
differences
in
potentials
of
historically
the one
treating
are
kind between
a
hand, and
grossest
there
the
political
established
organization on
the
that
obvious
needs and
party
broad support,
a new or
on
small political
the other . . . .
discrimination
with
can
Sometimes
lie
in
In the
direct impact on
second
place, the
New
Hampshire law
tallied.
has
no
vote, or on the
It is generally thought
that
11
Dole
____
(1987) (discussing, in
connection
with
Congress'
achievement
of objectives
spending
which
powers,
Congress is
"the
indirect
not empowered
to
discernible
believe
here.
that
because they
The record
minority
have no
ballot clerks.
minority parties
parties are
at
right to appoint
offers
special
no
reason to
or undue
election inspectors
risk
and
(e.g., appointing
places
evidence
a challenger of
voters, see
___
over voting
no
in
the
casting and
tallying of
votes,
and mere
suspicion or
paranoia is too
rest a claim of
In
that Libertarian
election
purely
inspectors
conjectural.
conclude, without
and ballot
To
hold
a shred
public trust
clerks are
otherwise
on
the prowl
would require
of competent evidence,
breach the
is
us
to
that election
in order to
serve the
interests of
____________________
plan to deprive
moreover,
no
Libertarians of the
showing that
similar
the mishaps to
part of a concerted
right to vote.
gaffes
have not
12
There
is,
afflicted
political party,
will
and, moreover,
that Democrats
and Republicans
C
C
Having analyzed
now
proceed
to ascertain
the level
of
burdens imposed, we
scrutiny that
we must
apply.
789.
We
recognize, of
election
code,
opposed
to those
even those
course,
that
that govern
that
every
govern the
ballot access
460 U.S. at
provision of
voting
an
process as
or eligibility
of
the
Anderson,
________
provisions of an election
But
different
and
is relatively minor.
aptly
magnitude) of
put, lack
plaintiffs'
of
First and
the
alleged injury
to
the
we conclude
that
the defendants
regulation had
need only
rational
v. Meyer,
_____
show that
basis.
See,
___
the enactment
e.g.,
____
Coalition for
______________
399 (8th
13
of the
1984)
F. Supp. 64, 71
(N.D.
Ohio)
(three-judge
court),
aff'd
_____
mem.,
____
414
U.S.
990
(1973).6
372, is not to
the
Board
the contrary.
of
There the
Canvassers
of
unconstitutionally conditioned
upon membership in
organizations.
plaintiffs'
motion for
merits.
with one
of
Providence
voter registrar
of three
a preliminary
City
appointment as a
or affiliation
the
political
denied the
injunction mainly
on the
on the
id. at 374
___
___
and added:
Amendment
abridge fundamental
rights
of
speech
and
a vital
state interest . . . .
So
viewed,
issue, it
but without
appears
prejudging the
that plaintiffs
raise
Id. at
___
376-77.
the district
The panel
it was for
____________________
v. Slockett,
________
604 F.
Supp. 1391
In
(D. Iowa
deputy registrars
solely from
persons nominated
by the
See
___
id. at
___
1392.
As
we do
here, the
district
regulation
court
was
concluded
the
"relatively minor."
nonetheless proceeded
the law.
that
to apply
burden
Id.
___
at
imposed
1397.
strict scrutiny
by
the
The court
and invalidated
reasoning unpersuasive.
14
Board must
bear in
justifying that
abridgment, and
Id. at 377.
___
the
whether in
Fairly read,
today.
D
D
to
manageable
proportions in
order
to
enhance administrative
Too
many
The
cooks, the
defendants
say, will
spoil
the broth.
The
state
has
valid interest
in
preserving
See,
___
the
e.g.,
____
American Party, 415 U.S. at 782 n.14; Coalition for Sensible and
_______________
__________________________
It is certainly reasonable to
Common sense
numerous,
they
will merely
get in
each
other's way
to afford close
and thus
supervision.7
____________________
7A
which
fair parallel
the
interest
Court
.
frustration of
can be
has
in
drawn to
ballot access
acknowledged that
avoiding
confusion,
the
cases in
"important
deception,
state
and even
reasoning
efficiency and
extends
to
orderliness at
the state's
We believe that
strivings
to
promote
limitations on
the number of persons who are permitted to work inside the rail.
15
one should
ideal size
of the complement
is for
Within wide
the state to
determine.
that states
The
plaintiffs'
riposte
is
to
suggest
that
New
Hampshire must
as election
put
increment would
another way,
that this
be the
straw that
suggestion
burden.
That
See Munro v.
___ _____
similar
claim on
the
basis that
"[s]uch
a requirement
would
damage
before
the legislature
could take
corrective action").
the electoral
constitutionally
protected rights.
See id.
New
Hampshire's
___ ___
solution
behind
for
which involves
the rail at
restricting
parties
the
number of
the hands of
successful in the
recent past at
is a reasonable response
16
persons
to an
authentic problem.
We
election
hold
that
inspectors and
advancing
Hampshire's
ballot
off fraud,
F.2d at
upholding regulation
rational
permitting membership
from parties
court)
of
a rational
selecting
means of
at the polls.
basis review
basis
review
and
upholding
of boards of elections to
350
two highest
F. Supp.
(suggesting
576,
that
and
garnering the
v. Lomenzo,
_______
(three-judge
clerks is
(applying
method
Bishop
______
New
at 71
regulation
be drawn solely
vote totals);
see also
___ ____
588-89 (E.D.N.Y.
regulation
1972)
requiring
volunteer
Republican
deputy
registrars
or Democratic
to
be
parties
enrolled
merited
members
only rational
of
the
basis
exist
were
if registration by [only]
permitted").
While
officials, or a somewhat
serve, the
state is
one party or
other
methods
of
by an independent
selecting
these
free to choose
universe of
IV.
IV.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
We need
go no further.8
Since New
Hampshire's grant
____________________
8The plaintiffs'
separate
discussion.
Equal Protection
argument is
unworthy of
to
New
Hampshire's
requirements
for
achieving
official
not
draw
distinctions
between
it
and
other
the state
recognized
17
of
a monopoly
ballot
clerks
to the
two
most
of election
inspectors and
popular political
parties
is
it
is constitutional.
Libertarian Party
Nothing succeeds
has the
like success,
same opportunity as
and the
its better-known
the top
two spots
play
more
process.
in a gubernatorial
active role
in
the
election, and
mechanics
thereafter
electoral
Affirmed.
Affirmed.
________
of the
one of
____________________
political parties.
18