Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 6

USCA1 Opinion

September 6, 1996

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-1093

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL A. CROOKER,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]


___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,


___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Owen S. Walker, Federal Defender Office, on brief for appellant


______________

Donald K. Stern,
________________

United States

Attorney, and

Ariane D. Vuo
______________

Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam.
__________

Michael A. Crooker,

who is currently

serving

district

special

96-month term

of

condition

(I.R.S).

of supervised

requirements and

20 F.3d

notification

the

order

release

requiring him

We think that Crooker's concern that

indicated that the I.R.S.

Gallo,
_____

7, 12

may

will contact Crooker directly with

instructions.

(1st Cir.

Cf.
___

by

United States
_____________

1994) (observing

limited to the

and that

be illuminated

the condition

Crooker's probation officer has

process is not

probation order,

to

of the Internal Revenue Service

too vague is premature.

its

appeals from

court order denying his motion to delete or amend a

comply with the requirements

is

imprisonment,

the meaning

the

v.

that the

four corners of

of a

probation

judge's statements,

the

probation officer's instructions, or other events, any or all

of which may assist

Should

is

in completing the notification process).

the I.R.S. fail to do so on or about the time Crooker

released--or

incomplete, or

should

or from

may

seek

time, bring

court

concern

inconsistent

any

of Crooker's

questions

clarification

court.

the

plea agreement

See Loc. R. 27.1.


___

-2-

from

Similarly, Crooker

I.R.S.

court's intent at sentencing.

Affirmed.
_________

unclear,

to the attention

that

with the

be

further

the district

may, at that

any

instructions

otherwise leave

unanswered--Crooker

Probation

the

of the

district

instructions

or with

are

the district

You might also like