Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Banks v. McGee, 1st Cir. (1996)
Banks v. McGee, 1st Cir. (1996)
No. 95-1673
THOMAS BANKS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
____________________
November 8, 1996
____________________
Per Curiam.
___________
Upon
careful
review of
the
briefs and
limited
record
in
substantial question
this
appeal,
was highly
no
evidence
that
should
conclude
1.
we
prejudicial
present
1979).
the
similarly unavailing.
2.
to commit
"bad
which to
Cir.
propensity
only show
character from
act."
infer a
and would
discovered evidence
to the attention of
newly
Therefore, we will not consider that claim for the first time
in this appeal.
Cir. 1987).
3.
Plaintiff waived
51.
the jury
the lack
of instructions on
claims or
standard.
that
record
the
affected the
here
exhibits no
fairness, integrity,
-2-
error
or
that
"seriously
public reputation
of
judicial proceedings."
See
___
4.
We
reject
jury's request
relatively
plaintiff's
to read
brief, and
trial
so the
contention
transcripts.
regarding
the
The trial
was
district court's
decision to
in such matters.
5.
stymied
trial
here because
transcript.
of such
plaintiff
See
___
has provided
Fed. R. App.
an incomplete
P. 10(b)(1) (appellant
a transcript
to include a transcript of
record on appeal).
question
In any case,
not lead
remained as to the
us to conclude
city's liability.
the
limited
that a
jury
___ ___
nevertheless
may consider
appellant's claim
possible).
Affirmed.
________
-3-
to the
extent