Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    United States v. Gonzalez-Correa, 1st Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The US Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit affirmed the district court's sentence in the case of United States v. Carlos Rene Gonzalez-Correa. In a brief per curiam opinion, the appeals court found no reason to overturn the district court's findings or conclusion. The appeals court stated that the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous, so it affirmed the sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Gonzalez-Correa, 1st Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views6 pages
    The US Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit affirmed the district court's sentence in the case of United States v. Carlos Rene Gonzalez-Correa. In a brief per curiam opinion, the appeals court found no reason to overturn the district court's findings or conclusion. The appeals court stated that the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous, so it affirmed the sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-06-26 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 97-1096

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The US Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit affirmed the district court's sentence in the case of United States v. Carlos Rene Gonzalez-Correa. In a brief per curiam opinion, the appeals court found no reason to overturn the district court's findings or conclusion. The appeals court stated that the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous, so it affirmed the sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views6 pages

    United States v. Gonzalez-Correa, 1st Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The US Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit affirmed the district court's sentence in the case of United States v. Carlos Rene Gonzalez-Correa. In a brief per curiam opinion, the appeals court found no reason to overturn the district court's findings or conclusion. The appeals court stated that the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous, so it affirmed the sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 6

    USCA1 Opinion

    [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
    ____________________

    No. 97-1096

    UNITED STATES,

    Appellee,

    v.

    CARLOS RENE GONZALEZ-CORREA,

    Defendant, Appellant.

    ____________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

    [Hon. Daniel R. Dominguez, U.S. District Judge]


    ___________________

    ____________________

    Before

    Selya, Boudin and Stahl,


    Circuit Judges.
    ______________

    ____________________

    Lucien B. Campbell,
    ___________________
    Maldonado Rodriguez,
    ___________________

    Acting Federal

    Public Defender,

    Assistant Federal Public Defender,

    and

    La
    __

    on brief

    appellant.
    Guillermo Gil, United
    _____________

    States Attorney, Nelson Perez-Sosa, Anto


    _________________ ____

    R. Bazan,
    ________

    Assistant

    United States

    Attorneys,

    and Jose A. Quil


    ______________

    Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.


    ________

    ____________________

    June 20, 1997


    ____________________

    Per Curiam.
    __________

    Upon careful review

    of the parties' briefs

    and

    the record, we find

    court's conclusion.

    no reason to

    We cannot

    overturn the district

    say that the district court's

    findings were clearly erroneous.

    The sentence is affirmed.


    ________

    See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.


    ___

    -2-

    You might also like