Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Smith-Barney, Inc. v. Teitler, 1st Cir. (1997)
Smith-Barney, Inc. v. Teitler, 1st Cir. (1997)
No. 97-1009
SMITH-BARNEY, INC.,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
URSULA EKINCI,
Defendant, Appellee.
__________
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
for appellee Sm
Barney, Inc.
Douglas F. Jennings on brief for appellee Ursula Ekinci.
___________________
____________________
Per Curiam.
__________
Upon
briefs
without
merit.
The
district
court's
order
correctly
Affirmed.
________
-2-