Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    George P. Koulizos, Rita Koulizos v. First Holding Corporation, Robert S. Hollander, David G. Gee, 914 F.2d 1494, 1st Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had entered an order dismissing one defendant, appellee Gee, and directing him to submit a statement for attorney fees. However, the order did not resolve all claims against all parties. As there was no Rule 54(b) certification, the order was not appealable. As the district court had not yet entered a final decision, the Sixth Circuit lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    George P. Koulizos, Rita Koulizos v. First Holding Corporation, Robert S. Hollander, David G. Gee, 914 F.2d 1494, 1st Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had entered an order dismissing one defendant, appellee Gee, and directing him to submit a statement for attorney fees. However, the order did not resolve all claims against all parties. As there was no Rule 54(b) certification, the order was not appealable. As the district court had not yet entered a final decision, the Sixth Circuit lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-09-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 914 F.2d 1494 Docket: 90-1107

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had entered an order dismissing one defendant, appellee Gee, and directing him to submit a statement for attorney fees. However, the order did not resolve all claims against all parties. As there was no Rule 54(b) certification, the order was not appealable. As the district court had not yet entered a final decision, the Sixth Circuit lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    George P. Koulizos, Rita Koulizos v. First Holding Corporation, Robert S. Hollander, David G. Gee, 914 F.2d 1494, 1st Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had entered an order dismissing one defendant, appellee Gee, and directing him to submit a statement for attorney fees. However, the order did not resolve all claims against all parties. As there was no Rule 54(b) certification, the order was not appealable. As the district court had not yet entered a final decision, the Sixth Circuit lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    914 F.

    2d 1494

    Unpublished Disposition
    NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of
    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth
    Circuit.
    George P. KOULIZOS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    Rita Koulizos, Plaintiff,
    v.
    FIRST HOLDING CORPORATION, Robert S. Hollander,
    Defendants,
    David G. Gee, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 90-1107.

    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.


    Sept. 21, 1990.
    ORDER
    1

    This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a),
    Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

    It appears from the record that the district court entered an order on December
    29, 1989, dismissing appellee Gee and directing him to submit to the court a
    statement for attorney fees incurred in the matter. Appellant appealed from that
    order.

    Absent Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification, an order disposing of fewer than all the
    claims or parties involved in the action is not appealable. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
    v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 742-45 (1976). No 54(b) certification was made in the
    instant case. The final decision of the district court has not been entered during
    the pendency of this appeal; therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction. See Gillis v.
    United States Dep't of HHS, 759 F.2d 565, 569 (6th Cir.1985).

    It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of

    jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

    You might also like