Design Charts Sewerage PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 29

AS 22002006

(Incorporating Amendment No. 1)

AS 22002006

Australian Standard

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Design charts for water supply and


sewerage

This Australian Standard was prepared by Committee PL-045, Plastics Pipe Systems Test
and Calculation Methods. It was approved on behalf of the Council of Standards Australia on
13 October 2005.
This Standard was published on 16 January 2006.

The following are represented on Committee PL-045:

Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry


Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
CSIRO Manufacturing and Infrastructure Technology
Certification Interests (Australia)
Energy Networks Association
Engineers Australia
Master Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers New Zealand
New Zealand Water and Waste Association
Plastics Industry Pipe Association of Australia
Plastics New Zealand
Water Services Association of Australia

This Standard was issued in draft form for comment as DR 00340.

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Standards Australia wishes to acknowledge the participation of the expert individuals that
contributed to the development of this Standard through their representation on the
Committee and through the public comment period.

Keeping Standards up-to-date


Australian Standards are living documents that reflect progress in science, technology and
systems. To maintain their currency, all Standards are periodically reviewed, and new editions
are published. Between editions, amendments may be issued.
Standards may also be withdrawn. It is important that readers assure themselves they are
using a current Standard, which should include any amendments that may have been
published since the Standard was published.
Detailed information about Australian Standards, drafts, amendments and new projects can
be found by visiting www.standards.org.au
Standards Australia welcomes suggestions for improvements, and encourages readers to
notify us immediately of any apparent inaccuracies or ambiguities. Contact us via email at
mail@standards.org.au, or write to Standards Australia, GPO Box 476, Sydney, NSW 2001.

AS 22002006
(Incorporating Amendment No. 1)

Australian Standard

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Design charts for water supply and


sewerage

First published 1978.


Reprinted 1982.
Second edition 2006.
Reissued incorporating Amendment No. 1 (April 2009).

COPYRIGHT
Standards Australia
All rights are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or copied in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without the written
permission of the publisher.
Published by Standards Australia GPO Box 476, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
ISBN 0 7337 7084 3

AS 22002006

PREFACE
This Standard was prepared by the Australian members of the Joint Standards
Australia/Standards New Zealand Committee, PL-045, Plastics pipe systems test and
calculation methods to supersede AS 22001978.
This Standard incorporates Amendment No. 1 (April 2009). The changes required by the
Amendment are indicated in the text by a marginal bar and amendment number against the
clause, note, table, figure or part thereof affected.
After consultation with Stakeholders in both countries, Standards Australia and Standards
New Zealand decided to develop this Standard as an Australian, rather than an
Australian/New Zealand Standard.
The objective of this Standard is to provide designers of pipelines for the conveyance of
water and sewerage, with a set of charts and mathematical formulae for the determination of
flow characteristics.
The terms normative and informative have been used in this Standard to define the
application of the appendix to which they apply. A normative appendix is an integral part
of a Standard, whereas an informative appendix is only for information and guidance.

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Statements expressed in mandatory terms in notes to tables and figures are deemed to be
requirements of this Standard. Other notes are for information and guidance only.

AS 22002006

CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD.............................................................................................................................. 4
1 SCOPE........................................................................................................................ 5
2

DERIVATION OF CHARTS...................................................................................... 5

HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF PIPESCOLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA................ 6

4
5

HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF PIPESMANNING FORMULA .................................. 6


DEPTH/FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF PIPES PART FULL ................................ 6

RESISTANCE AND ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS............................................... 6

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

APPENDIX A EXAMPLESCOLEBROOK-WHITE CHARTS ......................................... 22

AS 22002006

FOREWORD
The pipe-flow charts in this Standard are based on the Manning formula and the
Colebrook-White formula. These two formulae were chosen as they represent those most
commonly used for pipeline design in Australia. Designers will need to make their own
choice as to which formula they wish to adopt.
It must be realized that the charts and formulae on which they are based may have
limitations on the range of velocities, diameters and roughness coefficients to be used. They
may be inaccurate particularly where the parameters used are outside the conditions upon
which the formulas were originally based. A guide to roughness coefficients for various
pipe materials is given in Table 2.

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

The Colebrook-White formula is regarded by many hydraulic design experts throughout the
world as the most accurate basis for hydraulic design. It has had ample experimentation
confirmation over wide conditions of flow.

AS 22002006

STANDARDS AUSTRALIA
Australian Standard
Design charts for water supply and sewerage
1 SCOPE
This document provides design charts for the flow of liquid through pipes and fittings based
upon surface roughness, diameter, velocity and hydraulic gradient. The resistance
coefficients of fittings are also included.
The use of computer spreadsheets and programmable calculators has allowed the
determination of pipe flow and head loss to be made without the use of charts. Where the
unknown factor is the hydraulic gradient, this can be determined either by successive
approximation using the Colebrook-White formula or by use of Moodys approximation to
the Colebrook-White transition formula.
Therefore the charts provided in this document are for approximate evaluations only. For
critical calculations the mathematical formulae must be used.
2 DERIVATION OF CHARTS
2.1 Formulae
The design charts are based on the following formulae:
(a)

Manning:

V=

1 0.67 0.5
R S
n

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

or

V=
(b)

0.3950 0.67 0.5


D S
n

Colebrook-White:

k
1.255v
0.5
+
V = (32 gRS ) log
0.5
14.8 R R(32 gRS )

or
V = 2(2 gDS )

0.5

k
2.51v
+
log
0.5
3.7 D D (2 gDS )

where

www.standards.org.au

Manning roughness coefficient

Colebrook-White roughness coefficient, in metres

velocity, in metres per second

hydraulic radius, in metres, ( = D/4 for circular pipes)

circular cross-section pipe, inside diameter, in metres

slope, in metres per metre


Standards Australia

AS 22002006

gravitational acceleration, in metres per second squared

kinematic viscosity of water, in square metres per second.

2.2 Kinematic viscosity of water at various temperatures


The kinematic viscosities for water at various temperatures given in Table 1 allow designers
to evaluate the effects of water at various temperatures.
TABLE 1
KINEMATIC VISCOSITY v BETWEEN 0C and 50C
Temperature C

Kinematic viscosity m 2 /s

0
4
5

1.79 10 -6
1.57 10 -6
1.53 10 -6

10
15
20

1.31 10 -6
1.14 10 -6
1.01 10 -6

25
30
35

8.95 10 -7
8.03 10 -7
7.25 10 -7

40
45
50

6.58 10 -7
5.95 10 -7
5.40 10 -7

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

NOTES:
1

The Colebrook-White charts have been drawn for a water temperature of 20C.
Although the temperature of water and sewage varies between seasons and also
between localities, 20C is considered to be a suitable mean value for Australian
conditions. A temperature correction table has not been included because the increase
or decrease in discharge due to temperature variations is small. In fact an increase or
decrease in temperature of 10C will vary the discharge by only about 3 percent.

Diameters given on the various charts represent internal diameters of pipes. Designers
should therefore ensure that, when using the charts, actual internal diameters are
applied, and not the nominal size from the various Australian standards for pipes.

Examples of the use of the Colebrook-White formula charts are given in Appendix A.
For some other charts, an example is given below the chart.

3 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF PIPESCOLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA


Charts 1 to 11 are based upon the Colebrook-White formula and assume the pipes are
flowing full, with water at 20C.
4 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF PIPESMANNING FORMULA
Chart 12 is based upon the Manning formula for pipes flowing full.
5 DEPTH/FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF PIPES PART FULL
The relationship between proportional depth, velocity and discharge is given in Chart 13.
6 RESISTANCE AND ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS
A guide to resistance coefficients of valves and fittings is given in Chart 14. A guide to
roughness coefficients for various pipe materials is given in Table 2.

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

CHART 1 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.003 mm

www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

CHART 2 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.006 mm

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

AS 22002006

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

A1

CHART 3 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.015 mm

www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

10

CHART 4 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.03 mm

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

11

AS 22002006

CHART 5 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.06 mm

www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

12

CHART 6 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.15 mm

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

13

AS 22002006

CHART 7 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.30 mm

www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

14

CHART 8 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 0.60 mm

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

15

AS 22002006

CHART 9 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 1.50 mm

www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

16

CHART 10 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 3.00 mm

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

17

AS 22002006

CHART 11 COLEBROOK-WHITE FORMULA WITH k = 6.00 mm

www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

18

NOTE: n = 0.012 use the hydraulic gradient scale at right of chart. For values of n other than 0.012 use the inverted
hydraulic gradient scale at left of chart by drawing a straight line from the hydraulic gradient scale for n = 0.012
through the appropriate value on the values of n scale (see Example 2).
Examples:
1. Given
Find:
2. Given
Find:

n = 0.012; Q = 20 L/s; Hydraulic gradient = 0.4 percent


D = 192 mm; V = 0.69 m/s.
n = 0.010; Q = 500 L/s; Hydraulic gradient = 0.5 percent
D = 572 mm; V = 1.93 m/s.

CHART 12 MANNING FORMULA WITH D = 60 mm to 2000 mm

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

19

LEGEND:
Q
Q0
V
Example:
Given:

=
=
=

=
=
=

Full flow velocity


Depth of flow
Internal pipe diameter

Part-full discharge
Full flow discharge
Part-full velocity

V0
d
D

Q 0 = 100 L/s
Hydraulic gradient = 0.8 percent
k = 0.6 mm

Then from above chart:


Proportional depth
=
d =
d =
Also:
Proportional velocity =
V =
V =

From Chart 8:

Also given

AS 22002006

D = 300 mm
V 0 = 1.41 m/s.
Q = 43 L/s
Q/Q 0 = 0.43

0.46
0.46 300
138 mm
0.96
0.96 1.41
1.35 m/s

CHART 13 PROPORTIONAL VELOCITY AND DISCHARGE IN PART-FULL CIRCULAR


SECTIONS

www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

AS 22002006

20

NOTES:
1

To obtain approximate head loss in


g = acceleration due to gravity in m/s 2).

metres

multiply

All valves fully open unless otherwise indicated.

See Appendix A, Example 3 for an example of calculations.

Brackets signify a range of values.

by

V 2 /2g (V =

velocity

in

m/s,

CHART 14 RESISTANCE COEFFICIENTS OF VALVES AND FITTINGS

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

21

AS 22002006

TABLE 2
GUIDE TO ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR PIPES
CONCENTRICALLY JOINTED AND CLEAN

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Type of pipe

Roughness coefficient
Colebrook-White
Manning
k, mm
n
0.015 0.06
0.008 0.011
0.06 0.15
0.009 0.012
0.03 0.06
0.009 0.010
0.003 0.015
0.008 0.009
0.15 0.6
0.010 0.013
0.03 0.15
0.009 0.012
0.03 0.15
0.009 0.011
0.03 0.15
0.009 0.012
0.003 0.15
0.008 0.009
0.03 0.15
0.009 0.011
0.003 0.015
0.008 0.009
0.003 0.015
0.008 0.009
0.15 0.6
0.010 0.013
0.015 0.06
0.008 0.009
0.06 0.3
0.009 0.012
0.01 0.06
0.006 0.011

Asbestos cement
Bitumen-lined concrete
Spun bitumen-lined steel
Brass
Cast iron (unlined)
Cement-mortar lined (in-situ)
Coal-tar enamel lined steel
Concrete, centrifugally spun
Copper
Zinc-coated (galvanized) steel
Thermoplastics
Thermosetting plastics
Vitrified clay
Fibre cement
Ductile iron, bitumen lined
Ductile iron and steel, cement mortar lined with or
without seal coats
Ductile iron and steel, epoxy lined
0.01 0.03
0.006 0.009
Steel, polyethylene lined
0.003 0.015
0.008 0.009
NOTES:
1 The values of k above are given in millimetres. The form of the Colebrook-White formula given in
Clause 2.1 Item (b) uses k in metres, thus a factor of 10-3 should be applied to the above values before
substitution in the formula.
2 The values in the Table show a range of roughness coefficients. The lower value in the range represents the
expected value for clean, new pipes laid straight. Where there are angular deflections at joints the initial
roughness coefficients will be higher. Other factors that will also influence the roughness coefficient are
listed below. The higher value in the range represents the typical maximum expected for the product. It
cannot be an absolute maximum, as the factors detailed below can lead to even higher roughness values in
some circumstances. In particular, higher values can arise from the formation of slimes on the pipe wall.
This can occur with all pipe products, and is more a function of the fluid being conveyed than the
particular pipe product used. Recommendations on the appropriate roughness coefficient for a particular
fluid may be obtained from the pipe supplier.
Specific factors that may increase the roughness coefficient are:
(a)
Biological growths and other obstructions.
(b)
Slime deposits, incrustations, detritus and other debris.
(c)
Deterioration of unlined ferrous surfaces, hence bore diminished by oxide formations.
(d)
Irregularities at joints, such as
(i)
eccentricity;
(ii)
abrupt decrease of diameter;
(iii)
protrusions of mortar or other jointing materials; and
(iv)
inadequate closure, especially if this has permitted tree roots to enter.
(e)
Amount and size of solids being transported.
(f)
Disturbances of flow from branches, especially in sewers.
3 Modern water supply pipes with rubber-ring joints and anti-corrosive linings tend to be unaffected by most
of the factors in Note 2, although slimes and similar growths occur in certain conditions, e.g. Mannings n
up to 0.018 has been measured on slime-coated steel water pipes.
4 Elastomeric seal joints are commonly used in sewerage systems today, so Note 2(d) above is applicable
mainly in the study of older lines. Note 2(c) would be extremely rare but the factors 2(a), 2(b) and 2(f) may
combine to have a large influence, modified often by cleaning and maintenance. After consideration of all
these factors, the original surface of pipes may be of little consequence.
5 In the choice of friction coefficients to suit an infinite variety of circumstances, educated engineering
judgement is of prime importance.
www.standards.org.au

Standards Australia

AS 22002006

22

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLESCOLEBROOK-WHITE CHARTS
(Informative)
A1 EXAMPLE 1
A concrete pipe (centrifugally spun) is required to discharge 900 L/s when laid at a gradient
of 1 in 430. Calculate the size needed.
Data:
Q

= 900 L/s

Hydraulic gradient

= 1 in 430 = 0.23 percent

= 0.06 mm (from Table 6.1)

On Chart 5 for k = 0.06 mm read Q = 900 L/s on the left hand scale and hydraulic gradient
0.23 percent on the top scale. The intersection of inclined lines for these values gives
Velocity

= 1.71 m/s (bottom scale)

Diameter

= 820 mm (right hand scale).

A2 EXAMPLE 2
A UPVC pressure pipe is required to discharge 100 L/s. If the diameter is 300 mm,
determine the head loss due to friction in the pipe.

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Data:
Q

= 100 L/s

= 300 mm

= 0.015 mm (from Table 2)

On Chart 3 for k = 0.015 read Q = 100 L/s on the left hand scale and D = 300 mm on the
right hand scale. The intersection of lines for these values gives
Velocity

= 1.41 m/s (bottom scale)

Hydraulic gradient

= 0.48 percent (top scale).

The head loss due to friction is 0.48 m per 100 m of pipe length.
A3 EXAMPLE 3
A pump is required to lift 35 L/s of water from reservoir A to tank B (see Figure A1). Water
levels as shown in the figure are assumed constant. Calculate all head losses and determine
total dynamic head for pump.

Standards Australia

www.standards.org.au

23

AS 22002006

FIGURE A1 PUMP OPERATION

HEAD LOSSES IN PIPELINE


1.

150 mm ductile iron pipe; total


length L = 80 m; k = 0.06 mm (from Table 2)
From Chart 5: V = 2 m/s;
V 2/2g = 0.2 m
Head loss = 2.9 m/100 m

2.

Head loss for 80 m

= 2.32 m

200 mm ductile iron pipe; total


length L = 40 m; k = 0.06 mm (from Table 2)
From Chart 5: V = 1.1 m/s;
V 2/2g = 0.06 m
Head loss = 0.55 m/100 m

Head loss for 40 m

= 0.22 m

Total head loss for pipeline

= 2.54 m

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

HEAD LOSSES IN VALVES AND FITTINGS


3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Square inlet: k = 0.5


150 mm elbow, medium radius;
k = 0.6
150 mm gate valve, fully open;
k = 0.2
Swing check valve, fully open;
k = 1.3
150 mm gate valve, 50% pen;
k = 2.4
Sudden enlargement, d/D = 0.75;
k = 0.2
200 mm elbow, long radius;
k = 0.3
Pipe outlet;
k = 1.0

Head loss = 0.5 0.2

= 0.10 m

Head loss = 0.6 0.2

= 0.12 m

Head loss = 0.2 0.2

= 0.04 m

Head loss = 1.3 0.2

= 0.26 m

Head loss = 2.4 0.2

= 0.48 m

Head loss = 0.2 0.2

= 0.04 m

Head loss = 0.3 0.06

= 0.02 m

Head loss = 1.0 0.06

= 0.06 m

Total head loss for valves and fittings

= 1.12 m

Elevation difference

= 6.00 m

TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD FOR PUMP

www.standards.org.au

= 9.66 m

Standards Australia

AS 22002006

24

AMENDMENT CONTROL SHEET


AS 22002006
Amendment No. 1 (2009)

CORRECTION
SUMMARY: This Amendment applies to Chart 3.

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Published on 30 April 2009.

Standards Australia
Standards Australia develops Australian Standards and other documents of public benefit and national interest.
These Standards are developed through an open process of consultation and consensus, in which all interested
parties are invited to participate. Through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Commonwealth Government,
Standards Australia is recognized as Australias peak non-government national standards body. Standards Australia
also supports excellence in design and innovation through the Australian Design Awards.
For further information visit www.standards.org.au

Australian Standards
Committees of experts from industry, governments, consumers and other relevant sectors prepare Australian
Standards. The requirements or recommendations contained in published Standards are a consensus of the views
of representative interests and also take account of comments received from other sources. They reflect the latest
scientific and industry experience. Australian Standards are kept under continuous review after publication and are
updated regularly to take account of changing technology.

International Involvement
Standards Australia is responsible for ensuring the Australian viewpoint is considered in the formulation of
International Standards and that the latest international experience is incorporated in national Standards. This role is
vital in assisting local industry to compete in international markets. Standards Australia represents Australia at both
the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

Sales and Distribution


Australian Standards, Handbooks and other documents developed by Standards Australia are printed and
distributed under license by SAI Global Limited.

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

For information regarding the development of Standards contact:


Standards Australia Limited
GPO Box 476
Sydney NSW 2001
Phone: 02 9237 6000
Fax: 02 9237 6010
Email: mail@standards.org.au
Internet: www.standards.org.au
For information regarding the sale and distribution of Standards contact:
SAI Global Limited
Phone: 13 12 42
Fax: 1300 65 49 49
Email: sales@sai-global.com

ISBN 0 7337 7084 3

Accessed by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND on 22 Aug 2012

This page has been left intentionally blank.

You might also like