PART ONE
Preclassical
Economics
Williom Petty“Where do we start?" asked the Red Queen.
“Start at the beginning,” answered the Dodo.
Lewis Caroll
Iehough economic activity has
been a characteristic of human
culture since the dawn of cviliza-
tion, there was litle formal analysis of
that activity until merchant capitalism
developed in Western Europe during the
fifteenth century. Atthat time the chiefly
agrarian European societies began in-
creasingly to trade among themselves,
setting the stage for the birth of eco-
nomics as a social study. The economic
studies ofthis time were not systematic:
‘economic theory evolved piecemeal from
individual inelleceual responses to con-
‘temporary problems. No grand analytical
systems appeared. It was not until the
mid-eighteenth century, with the em
gence of “classical economics” under
‘Adam Smith, that economics made si
nificant movement toward the status of
2 full-blown social science.
Given this reality, our study of the
history of economic ideas could begin
with classical Smithian economics. But
there are other approaches. For example,
we could begin around 1200, when the
possibilities of economic analysis were
first being recognized. Another approach
would be to start with major, later writers
3
‘of the Middle Ages. Yet another would be
to take account of the fact that possibly
the most significane development in the
social sciences has been the realization
that it is possible to examine aspects of
society analytically. The notion that so-
cial structures could be analyzed just as
the physical universe could be was eentu-
fies in its making and even dates back to
ancient Greek thought. Although the
Greek philosophers did not recognize
that the economy was capable of being
analyzed (as they clearly di the political
aspects of society), nevertheless their
analysis of what were essentially premar-
ket societies gave later thinkers a foun
dation that made their task easier. The
foundations argument suggests yet an-
other alternative. Ealier societies often
passed on their writings in the form of
religious tomes; thus, one could begin an
analysis of economic ideas with these
very early texts
Faced with these alternatives, we
have decided to begin with the develop-
ment of early non-Western economic
thought and Greek thought and then
to consider che writings of Arab-slamic
thinkers, the scholastics, the mercan- >>24 Patt
tilsts, and the physioerats, but to keep ou:
consideration ofthese writings short. Thus,
Part Lis shorter than the other sections but
long enough to give a sense of the impor
tance of the earlier writings.
‘An important reason for examining the
preclassical and premercantile ideas of the
Chinese, the Greeks, Arab-slamic writers
and the medieval schoolmen is to gair
insight into some of the more philosophi