Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rebuttal and Reply: Two Examples Are Used Below To Illustrate The Differences Between A Rebuttal and A Reply
Rebuttal and Reply: Two Examples Are Used Below To Illustrate The Differences Between A Rebuttal and A Reply
Rebuttal and Reply: Two Examples Are Used Below To Illustrate The Differences Between A Rebuttal and A Reply
Introduction: In all of Saskatchewans styles of debate either a reply or a rebuttal may be deliver
in the final address from each side. In other places, either a rebuttal or a reply is required.
Because reply speeches require a stronger understanding of the entire debate and greater
experience with debate in general, reply speeches are typically mastered after a debater learns to
deliver a good rebuttal. If a debater is using a case line, a reply must be used.
by the Negative case and not the Affirmative, the basic tenant of their case falls. (attacks the
fundamental principle of an opponents case) In addition, the clear benefits of social
programming remain undiminished. Public sector care is best across the entire spectrum. Yes,
the Affirmative is right the rich Americans receive more timely care and better access to health
care. But the majority of Americans struggle to meet their health care needs and the care that
20% of Americans receive is considered a travesty in Canada. Finally, social programs are
intrinsic as a part of Canadian values. We are ultimately a people that care about the equal
treatment of all, and the future of our children. (rebuilds the principle of your own case) Money
put into one needy child does not merely feed that child; it provides that child with the
opportunity to feed others when she becomes an adult. The Affirmative case cannot stand on the
basis of economics and is destroyed on the basis of human decency. We could never support this
resolution. (concludes with case line and why it matters)