Statistics SPSS Project

T-Test:
One-Sample Statistics
N
environment

Mean
49

Std. Deviation

4.3469

Std. Error Mean

.48631

.06947

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference
Lower

environment

62.570

48

.000

4.34694

4.2073

Upper
4.4866

Interpretations:

The value of t tabulated is 1.676 which is less than t calculated

There is not enough statistical evidence that the null hypothesis is true.
The value will fall somewhere between 4.2073 to 4.4866 and this type of
estimation is 95% of the times correct.
Significance is 0% so the result is overwhelmingly strong.

One way Anova:

The test between the relationship of motivation and teacher is as follows:
ANOVA
motivation
Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

Between Groups

10.996

1.222

Within Groups

14.644

39

.375

Total

25.640

48

F
3.254

Sig.
.005

Interpretation:

The value of f tabulated is 2.12 which is less than f calculated

There is enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative hypothesis is
true.

Significance is 0.5% so the result is overwhelmingly strong.

Linear Regression:
Variables Entered/Removeda
Model

Variables

Variables

Entered

Removed

teacher

Method

. Enter

a. Dependent Variable: motivation

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summaryb
Model

.391a

R Square

Adjusted R

Std. Error of the

Square

Estimate

.153

.135

.67974

a. Predictors: (Constant), teacher

b. Dependent Variable: motivation

ANOVAa
Model

Sum of Squares
Regression

df

Mean Square

3.924

3.924

Residual

21.716

47

.462

Total

25.640

48

Sig.

8.493

.005b

a. Dependent Variable: motivation

b. Predictors: (Constant), teacher

Coefficientsa
Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Sig.

Coefficients
B
1

(Constant)
teacher

Std. Error
1.563

.713

.497

.171

Beta

.391

2.190

.033

2.914

.005

a.

Dependent Variable: motivation

Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Predicted Value

2.9299

4.0486

3.6224

.28593

49

Std. Predicted Value

-2.422

1.490

.000

1.000

49

.099

.257

.131

.040

49

2.8351

4.0878

3.6254

.28707

49

-1.55423

1.44858

.00000

.67262

49

Std. Residual

-2.287

2.131

.000

.990

49

Stud. Residual

-2.414

2.155

-.002

1.016

49

-1.73209

1.48070

-.00297

.71010

49

-2.551

2.245

-.004

1.037

49

Mahal. Distance

.035

5.866

.980

1.340

49

Cook's Distance

.000

.333

.029

.060

49

Centered Leverage Value

.001

.122

.020

.028

49

Standard Error of Predicted

Value
Adjusted Predicted Value
Residual

Deleted Residual
Stud. Deleted Residual

a.

Dependent Variable: motivation

Charts:

Interpretation

for T:

T tabulated is 2.01 which is less than T calculated

There is enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative hypothesis is
true.

Interpretation for F:

The value of f tabulated is 4.08 which is less than f calculated

There is enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative hypothesis is
true.

Interpretation for R2:

39.1% change in motivation is due to the independent variable teacher.

Multiple Regression:
Variables Entered/Removeda
Model

Variables

Variables

Entered

Removed

teacher, student,

Method

. Enter

environmentb

a. Dependent Variable: motivation

b. Tolerance = .000 limits reached.

Model Summaryb
Model

.538a

R Square

Adjusted R

Std. Error of the

Square

Estimate

.290

.239

.62319

a. Predictors: (Constant), teacher, student, environment

b. Dependent Variable: motivation

ANOVAa
Model

Sum of Squares
Regression

df

Mean Square

6.656

2.219

Residual

16.311

42

.388

Total

22.967

45

Sig.

5.713

.002b

a. Dependent Variable: motivation

b. Predictors: (Constant), teacher, student, environment

Coefficientsa
Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Sig.

Coefficients
B
1

(Constant)

Std. Error
-1.615

1.305

environment

.153

.199

student

.737

.281

Beta
-1.237

.223

.107

.766

.448

.359

2.619

.012

teacher

.337

.185

.254

1.816

.077

a. Dependent Variable: motivation

Excluded Variablesa
Model

Beta In

Sig.

Partial

Collinearity

Correlation

Statistics
Tolerance

method

.b

.000

a. Dependent Variable: motivation

b. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), teacher, student, environment

Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Predicted Value

2.7157

4.2486

3.6196

.38459

46

Std. Predicted Value

-2.350

1.636

.000

1.000

46

.115

.380

.176

.055

46

2.7542

4.3077

3.6247

.38478

46

-1.45389

1.19619

.00000

.60206

46

Std. Residual

-2.333

1.919

.000

.966

46

Stud. Residual

-2.504

1.968

-.004

1.012

46

-1.67478

1.25710

-.00515

.66235

46

-2.682

2.040

-.008

1.037

46

Mahal. Distance

.550

15.767

2.935

2.795

46

Cook's Distance

.000

.238

.026

.044

46

Centered Leverage Value

.012

.350

.065

.062

46

Standard Error of Predicted

Value
Adjusted Predicted Value
Residual

Deleted Residual
Stud. Deleted Residual

a. Dependent Variable: motivation

Interpretation
for R:

The change in
independent variable combined is 53.8%

motivation due to all the

Interpretation for F:

The value of F tabulated is 2.84 which is less than F calculated

So accept H1

Interpretation for Significance:

The significance is 0% which indicates that there is overwhelming evidence to

support alternative hypothesis.

Chi-Square Test:
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

motivation * Age

50

100.0%

0.0%

50

100.0%

motivation * Gender

50

100.0%

0.0%

50

100.0%

Crosstab
Count
Age
17-20

motivation

Total

20-24

Total
24-28

28 above

1.50

1.75

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

10

12

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

37

50

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

36

.044

39.716

36

.308

7.691

.006

51.619

50

a. 51 cells (98.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .04.

motivation * Gender

Crosstab
Count
Gender
male

motivation

Total

female

1.50

1.75

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

10

12

3.75

4.00

4.25

4.50

4.75

5.00

13

37

50

Total

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

11.019

12

.527

Likelihood Ratio

12.890

12

.377

.221

.638

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

50

a. 25 cells (96.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .26.

Interpretation for Age & Motivation:

The value for X2 tabulated is 55.7585 which is greater than X 2 calculated

So there is not enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative
hypothesis is true.
The value of significance is 2.2% so there is strong evidence as it lies
between 0% to 5%.

Interpretation for Age & Motivation:

The value of X2 tabulated is 21.0261 which is greater than X2 calculated

So there is not enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative
hypothesis is true.
The value of significance is 26.35% so there insignificant evidence to infer
that alternative hypothesis is true as value lies above 10%.