Charles Sanders Pierce's points about habits and belief , truth and justification were relevant. Too often we take actions based on beliefs with little more than the concept of being right. If this technology were to be in widespread use would it inculcate the understanding that the sentences we string together are concrete in their meaning, that we can, if we are to do the work learn how to base our beliefs and justification of actions on something, really the only thing, we have that is near to objectivity. The alternatives are I think, Deontology, the maxim, do un to others.... and the all to common appeal to something outside of causes and consequences, metaphysics, it is right because it is the word of god.
Charles Sanders Pierce's points about habits and belief , truth and justification were relevant. Too often we take actions based on beliefs with little more than the concept of being right. If this technology were to be in widespread use would it inculcate the understanding that the sentences we string together are concrete in their meaning, that we can, if we are to do the work learn how to base our beliefs and justification of actions on something, really the only thing, we have that is near to objectivity. The alternatives are I think, Deontology, the maxim, do un to others.... and the all to common appeal to something outside of causes and consequences, metaphysics, it is right because it is the word of god.
Charles Sanders Pierce's points about habits and belief , truth and justification were relevant. Too often we take actions based on beliefs with little more than the concept of being right. If this technology were to be in widespread use would it inculcate the understanding that the sentences we string together are concrete in their meaning, that we can, if we are to do the work learn how to base our beliefs and justification of actions on something, really the only thing, we have that is near to objectivity. The alternatives are I think, Deontology, the maxim, do un to others.... and the all to common appeal to something outside of causes and consequences, metaphysics, it is right because it is the word of god.
Afterword
‘Truth and Toilets: Pragmatism and
the Practices of Lite
"have been assigned the job of summing up oF erapping up or moping |
up. could do the shor version and just say that Tom Grey gets it ight
then he delresthat no rest we each in pilsophicl investigation wil
‘undermine the working standards by which we asses chims base |
evidence and argument and adds thatthe pursuit of philosophic exp
‘ations not compulsory on pain of having one character impugned
(G54) The fist statement puts philosophy —pragmatist or any ater
ite pice asa special activity whore successes or flares do ot ental
‘yen make more ily suceses oF failures in activites other than th
ctivity of doing philosophy: the second statement zeluss to cone a
Superior moral status on those who engage regulary in this od! pus
‘Some people do philosophy, some peopl ats more don't and thse who