Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Two U.S.

House Armed Services Subcommittees Votes to Preserve JSF


Engine Competition
May 13, 2010 -- WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. House Armed Services Seapower
and Air-Land Forces subcommittees today each marked up the National Defense
Authorization Bill for Fiscal Year 2011 (H.R. 5136). Recognizing that the competition
created by dual-sourced engines for the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) drives cost savings
and reduces operational risk, both subcommittees voted to authorize $485 million in
continued funding of the GE/Rolls-Royce F136 engine for the JSF. "The committee
has believed that competition in the F-35 engine program helps ensure against the
operational risk of up to 95 percent of the entire U.S. tactical fighter fleet being
grounded due to an engine problem," said Air-Land Subcommittee Chairman Adam
Smith (D-WA) at today's markup. This latest milestone follows a long tradition of bi-
partisan Congressional support for the GE/RR F136 engine. Congress has funded the
engine for 14 years in order to preserve competition on the largest weapons
procurement program in history. Competing engines have been an integral
component of the JSF program from its inception, and competitive behavior is
proven to control costs: Government Accountability Office estimates have predicted
that competition between the two F-35 engine makers could lead to long-term
savings of up to 20 percent for the $100 billion engine program. "Competition has
been demonstrated to help limit cost growth in acquisition programs, including as
the first alternate engine program did for the F-15, F-16 and F-14. And competition
has also been demonstrated to motivate contractor responsiveness, technical
innovation, and improve engine maintainability, reliability, and durability," said
Smith. The F136 development program is more than 70 percent complete and
scheduled for flight testing next year. "Today, the competitive environment created
by having dual-sourced engines for the Joint Strike Fighter is estimated to save $1
billion during the next five years, and $20 billion over the life of the program," said
David Joyce, president and CEO of GE Aviation. "We are gratified that members of
the subcommittees strongly recognize that competition is the best cost control
mechanism for the largest defense program in U.S. history."

You might also like