The document discusses the classification of lichen species. It notes that Dr. Muller refrained from providing a full list of synonyms for lichen species due to their large numbers and difficulty of distinguishing them. Micheli greatly increased the number of documented lichen species to 298. Linnaeus retained Micheli's generic classification system. The document then lists the eight orders lichens are divided into according to their appearance, rather than reproductive structures. It also notes that Dr. Dillenius divided Michel's lichen genus into three categories.
The document discusses the classification of lichen species. It notes that Dr. Muller refrained from providing a full list of synonyms for lichen species due to their large numbers and difficulty of distinguishing them. Micheli greatly increased the number of documented lichen species to 298. Linnaeus retained Micheli's generic classification system. The document then lists the eight orders lichens are divided into according to their appearance, rather than reproductive structures. It also notes that Dr. Dillenius divided Michel's lichen genus into three categories.
The document discusses the classification of lichen species. It notes that Dr. Muller refrained from providing a full list of synonyms for lichen species due to their large numbers and difficulty of distinguishing them. Micheli greatly increased the number of documented lichen species to 298. Linnaeus retained Micheli's generic classification system. The document then lists the eight orders lichens are divided into according to their appearance, rather than reproductive structures. It also notes that Dr. Dillenius divided Michel's lichen genus into three categories.
The attentive number of the (peck., end the diffi-
culty of diftinguifhing them with a tolerable degree of certainty, has deterred Dr. fhller from adding fo full and complete a lift of fynonyrns to the plants of this genus as he has elfewhere done in that fplendid work. Plate the 2d exhibits rental elegant forts of their lichens. Linnous, and the followers of his method, who kern to have eflablithed their generical charatter from Micheh's dikoveries, retain alfo his generical. title. Micheks pallion kt the multiplication of !pe- cks is no-where more confpicuous than in the planto of this genus which be has molt mormoutly aug- mented to th; number of 298 fpedes. The Swedifh prokffor cannot be charged with this foible it is one of dae excellencies of his writings, that they in- culcate the emetic. He has fo far retrenched thio genus, that in his general enumeration of plants he recounts only eighty fpecies belonging to it. They are in this work divided into eight orders, according to the difference of appearance which they form by theirjadm coterie, little or no regard bring had to, what are ufually called the parts of Goftification. e. Litbnetelepreft tokrcukti. 5. Licbenee 2. Leciates leprelfrotellot, 6. Liaise, _polo:Teri. 5. Lidos" is6riceti. 7. Lie-iron froateselti.. 4 Latham jobicei. & licbeerefrIontitaff. Dr. Dillenias, in his molt elaborate work, intituled, Aqioria Moftertin, has divided this Michelian genm Ito three, under the names of arjisone. teralleidt; and Orientate. Under the word afire he comprehends the hairy treemolks, among which are the ifste of 2. 411' elm