This document contains a rating criteria used to evaluate and compare the site plans of two developments - Novaleta and Cavite City. It rates both developments across 41 criteria grouped into 16 categories related to site character, blocks, streets, subdivisions, lots, site layout, buildings, active transportation, car oriented commercial areas, and landscape/public spaces. Novaleta received a total score of 135 while Cavite City received a higher total score of 196, indicating it better meets the rating criteria.
This document contains a rating criteria used to evaluate and compare the site plans of two developments - Novaleta and Cavite City. It rates both developments across 41 criteria grouped into 16 categories related to site character, blocks, streets, subdivisions, lots, site layout, buildings, active transportation, car oriented commercial areas, and landscape/public spaces. Novaleta received a total score of 135 while Cavite City received a higher total score of 196, indicating it better meets the rating criteria.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document contains a rating criteria used to evaluate and compare the site plans of two developments - Novaleta and Cavite City. It rates both developments across 41 criteria grouped into 16 categories related to site character, blocks, streets, subdivisions, lots, site layout, buildings, active transportation, car oriented commercial areas, and landscape/public spaces. Novaleta received a total score of 135 while Cavite City received a higher total score of 196, indicating it better meets the rating criteria.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 SITE CHARACTER AND CONTEXT a. TOPOGRAPHY b. GRADING c. SITE FEATURES d. HERITAGE FEATURES e. EXISTING BUFFERS f. SIGNIFICANT TREES g. WATER COURSES h. WATER ACCESS i. VIEWS j. LOOKOUTS BLOCKS a. BLOCK SIZES b. DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINTS STREETS a. STREET PATTERN b. CUL-DE-SACS & DEAD ENDS c. RIGHT OF WAY d. STREET PATTERN ALTERNATIVES e. INTERNAL THOROUGH FARES f. LANE WAYS g. TRAFFIC CALMING SUBDIVISIONS a. LAYOUT b. PARKS AND OPEN SPACES c. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PARK d. PERIMETER e. SUBDIVISION GATEWAY LOTS a. CONFIGURATION b. PRIORITY SITES c. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PARK ARRANGEMENT SITE LAYOUT a. STREETSCAPE b. PARKING c. ARTERIAL CORRIDORS d. RELATIONSHIP OF USES e. SITE CHARACTER f. OUTDOOR DISPLAY AND RETAIL g. OPEN AREAS h. OUTDOOR AMENITY SPACE i. BUILDING SERVICE USES j. RESTROOMS k. UTILITIES l. LIGHTING m. TRASH AND RECYCLING n. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES BUILDINGS a. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION b. STREETSCAPE c. CORNER SITES d. CONTEXT e. HEIGHT AND MASS f. BUILDING FAÇADE g. ARTICULATION h. ENTRANCES i. FENESTRATION j. RETAIL FRONTAGES k. PRIORITY SITES l. HERITAGE ADJACENCY m. RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION a. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION b. PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES c. STREET SYSTEM d. PARKING AREAS e. TRAILS f. BICYCLE CIRCULATION g. TRANSIT CIRCULATIONS h. WAYFINDING CAR ORIENTED COMMERCIAL a. CAR ORIENTED COMMERCIAL b. AUTOMOBILE CANOPIES AND BAYS LANDSCAPE AND PUBLIC SPACES a. GENERAL DESIGNS b. PLANTER BEDS c. STREET TREES d. FRONTAGE PLANTING e. PERIMETER PLANTING f. FOUNDATION PLANTING g. TREE CANOPY h. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS i. SCREENING j. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING k. PARKS l. OUTDOOR AMENITY SPACES m. PLAY SPACES n. COMMUNITY GARDENS Tally 1 3 10 24 40 20 19 20 17 2 TOTAL 135 196
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910, Start/End Papers
The New York Tunnel Extension of the Pennsylvania Railroad