1 7

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

CMOS process Integrat ion

!otroguct Ion to CMOS tethno!QCJY



The power dissipation crisis of VLSI and how CMOS came to the rlssue

tf'1)S (mid 1970's): fast, dense and cheap (S1masks) -> dc steady current -) power drssioanon t wah of packing density -) ceramtc (not plastic) packages

CMOS (1963) is a Da1INANT IC TECHNOLOGY: gives lower power consumption in chips and in systems (I-Mbit t-l1OS DRAMs ~ 120 mW (-) • 50 mW tn

CMOS) tJLJ) c.,,.,,, s - P"II~

l'OD

[ . ..

!V D »c Po &J e..tv"'

J> IS'S' P"" s: E.J): PMOS

\frr. co

f.o.,tJ

rltl S U rre H .... (\I"() .z.

I'

'"

..

..

6-HOP6 I'

... ,

Vr~ ') 0 (O.8Vj

..

,~

• C44rt.y " SLtlU

• "f'AC~'~~

• L.IIrCII .. v_. ,

.--._1100

PD~..s ,.(.'; IJ"LY W .,. dt1flelbl

ueU. (DtC/DE CIIlf6G>6 _,. D"/A,,,.,~,rt/

Fl •. '-"I CMOS inv,cne:. (a) Circuit sc:hematic:. (b) o.vtc. c:rON MCtiOn. NNI1,c)

lo)

" io

i i

u

IAt""SSI"£# . NMOS 1l> U.r~ IN'

".~~ 6-EiVee. '70N.S

Ct.lOS

100 200

ChiO eom1)leJl11'l (0101

JOO

. Operatjon of CMOS inverteCi

~! " loa.d device (VTp < 0= -0.8V)

~,S !Ill driver (VTn) O~ O.8V) and both have VOO. SV ) e.n-.},4."'GC._~ ~"'~e

For the best perrormance of logic circurts !VTpl ~ VTn and small Olrnlt·ed t>V

'Os t ) 'I. f1 (w / L. ) r 'tI,., /t9"

/111ft) s ~e..+-, ~ :f!"" H~.Lp

"00 r-~ ....... ~f~"'_S_A;...:.1l S<!tl/,k;;g. /4r tJr c;

I I

I I

I I

J I

I

I I I

I I I I I I

. LOA:/)

"out 0.5 "DO

1/, _ 51/ '{ Ir~\-

fln10s -l>'n PtfO~-o* -

v ..

"MOS LI .. - 0

nMOS, LI. - 0

pMOS LI .... Lloc

o

1'1" 4.J

v Dttlr OfV' ~ » 6,/1 c S IS 0 tV

(bl 'rt-l~ Drweli!. IS D;::':- N":

.' . . 5.T€IfIDv-srl'trE 1".. I:)

A CMOS I.avener: (.) the schemltlc Ind (b) lbe I-V charKteriSlics. ""VJ!"~r

/

Uri/I'! liNN I [.(116

VOtkf'::r t1~

o II.. "oo-IV .. I "011

V

~

T1!!llw,s IE '(T c.v tI!,e e. Itt-:r

bV~/n/fJ- s c..JX~

Fipn 4.. (I) DC tfansfer curves, and (b) output curreal "'. input yolt. CMOS invenen with yanous K..I~ ratios. where IC - (WIL)f'&.,./r .. (Rd. 3)

V1n • 0 (tf"K)S off PM)S on) or 5 V (Pt()S all ~S M --)

~ ~

Vout- VOO (S V) or 0 V (swinging from rajl to rajA

Stat1c voltage Input/output cnaractertsttc r-transrer cnaractertsttcs)

*Negligible output current (,zleakage current of the ort device) in the static mode, significant current during switching (charging of CL)

-Excellent noise margin t'l1L = VIL - VOL (~1.25 V)

('!f!)

t-I1H = VOH - VIH

llt-'
~
..
t 3
~ I
-t~ 3'
I
~.f
.....
~;
Vt
I.) ., ~ 0,1 i ''I ..

Voo

noise voltage at the output of the! inverter

-- -

tolerated at the input of the II inverter

II

\ I I

\ I /

~\ I IN

\ I I \ i

\ i

'3 3'

l. 6·S (I) Output (Va) versus input (VI> voltage of CMOS inverter. (b) Current through -erter u a function of input vollage (solid curve); I-V charlcteristics of n· and p-channel lUlston (duhed curves). The numbers correspond LO different points on the inverter nsfer characteristic.ll S

v

p-D

v (t)

..

I I I

, I -~------ 0

, I I t

_.....!.- -t-

I t, : ~ I r ,

F"I-u... T"I he- ~ I! 6 r, htf;

Fiprt •. 5 Input and output waveforms of I CMOS invener

• I In"erlfT #1

v .... ,

fnn;ul! I)

V .. lcin:uill 2 and J)

#2

_3

(hi

FIt. 6-6 ('l~\S..~' '~f inverters connecled in series. (b) Defutition of noiJc marlins.

Advantages of Q1)S

-De,vice Ichip performance

-Smatter gates ( 1/2 N'1OS 1nverter), in sene of 1s01at10n, due to Pt1)S:

2x wider ) ~S (E) but rf'1:)S (D) 4x larger) N'1OS (E)~ large packing density -) 'Ist,r systems (closer to bipolars)

-10 in 1dentical1y sized submicron devices PM:)S and N"K)S are the same dUt to velOCIty saturatIon

.Interconnection area -t -) transistor area is less important as is the input ceeacttance (Ct"K)S ) t-t1OS) -) N'1OS not faster anymore (power dissipation -) T t -) ~ degradation)

-0105 can operate over a wider range of VOO than tf10S

-Less bOdy-biasing senstttvtty (no bootstrapping for transferance of a

signal through a string of inverters) -Better hardness than 1n tf'1OS

100
.....
~ 50
..:..
>.
"
~ 20
.~
1i 10
Ill:
..
c..
e
t: 5
'"
all
..
..
'"
,.
< 2 P.MOS COffP,4I!.148l£ r»

f'I-H()J ~ .s~.""'cllo/V T/lAIVStlroll$ (11 S~)

$1Ot'J~ ~q/e@~

,

'" 'tu," .00" '\"\

.~ ....

L...-~-~2 -""':3:--~ 100

.) l •. II'"

-.oIiOl " .. ·IV
. ,
-n.,."(TAl."~"lE; , .
, , " ,
I ! I I i I II : I J 1 I ! TI
==t,l • i I , I , I I I ! I I , I r
,
~".':=T[ I : I I I ! I II
I I riff I i 1 , III [ i
lOW'"'OW! .. !
sc"Oi"T~Y n, !
~ "~EDC..os " "
I--"jf", " ADYAHCJD lOW·"OW[II
(, , 'SC..oTlOC' n, "I F .... 'IIIC.;__O A~~fO
II ,I .'I>CT 1 I • I ! I I
~II H' i I ! SC"OTTKO· Tlll'.Sl J
J'_: 11'ji11 I ~+
~' j...a I ! I SC~TOC~TTl ~
r .o.o.-OOCEO ~~,~.l ~ll.! .• I I
I I Ill," : tOIl ICl-~
i I I j II j 1/ ~ ,ooLL II CMf}!1; ~~ £~~~ ~(f~~.$

tWf'" f'.

tk~~ ~xu I

Ii!

1

0.1 0.2 O.S 1 2 5 10 20 50

b) Average POWI!: Dinipttion (mW)

Fla. 6·' (I) Ratio of p.channel saruration current to /I·chlNlel saturation current inc:re.ues IS !he effective channel ienath of !he devices shrinks. due to velocity Slturation effects. (b) Comparative speed I1Id power characteristics of various CMOS and bipolar Io,ic families.

,I

~

*R.li~bHlty

"'Low T (power dissipation) + reHabiHty

"LiSS hot-carrier degradat10n because of: the Pt1)S load, no stanc

current, no bootstrapping (t E -) hot-carrier degradation) ... Less electromigration (no static current)

-Sort error rates (SERs) of DRAMS and SRAMs .v I to 2 order of magnitude due to wells (reversed biased juncttons block carrIers generated in the substrate)

·Cost issues

-wafer fab: 20" higher than in t-I1OS due to more complex process

-25-75 ~ of the total cost Is due to packaging -) CMOS use cheaper

plastic

-no grinding at the back (grounding at the front stde) and no gold coating

Dlsadyantages *Short-channel and hot carrier effects as 1n ~S *Somewhat lower packing density

*larger lnput capacitance in static logic gates (n- and p-channel MOSFETs in

parallel)

*PMJS with n+-poly gates scaling and connecting *We 11 contacts required

·Well process (11' T, t)

*latchup and prevent Ion

*Electrostatic discharge damage

The well controversy in CMOS

The need for wells in O1OS -) po (well/substrate) junctions at V<O: p-type biased wjth (-) voltage and n-type biased with (+) voltage

D-well Ct1)S ((@~H~~Y '{;;/ffYIf P=-!?cs J

fbI

lei

Idl

ure 5.J Cross-section, Ind top \'1ews of I typical p-well CMOS process II IU slo; levell: (I) p-well mul;.: (b I Ictive area muk: (c:) poly ,lIe muk: (d) psk: (e) /I" mlSlt: (f) c:ontlcl milk: IDd (I) metal mask.

1.,

AdVantages

*Better choice for pure-stat1c logic (. fJAl,AtvC4 eerase« p- ~ N-Hos)

*Used where p-type region Should be isolated (BJT as an on-chip driver) *EasJer fabricatfon as it is less susceptible tha.n-weIJ to field-Inversion *Easler for retrograde-well process (later)

"IIHlS ('p-well) better for SRAMs due to lower soft-error rate (SER) 'l!~1~ ':.~1~

gy,,.. Ska.fe, -" 'I'

-~-) -"

(f)

(;1

a-wen CMOS

For all EPRCt1s, microprocessors and DRAMs tn 1.25- 2.0 J,1m technology stnce n-channel transistor 1s bu11t on the low doped substrate (tradlt1ons)

1)ot~Pt chann.1 nOI)

D-sublt,at.

~DIlrA-N"?'IIC,G :

.. eoN~~/qLE lJl'rn NiY@,J '!rE(f;#tftft;&@t$, ~

fillirr 5." Cross-secuon of a finjsh~d 11·",'(11 CMOS structure .... uh >clf·ali~ned p. !ypc ch.mnel $lOp.

j),j IJDVAN,Alc ~

- seN!. I,' II~ 70 ':IcL£> - (IVI/E'~JNN

(2) Ionl" ....... ,"" by "'liteM ..... (J) "..eli ... ..., t..- lIOron , ... Dltll{ _tl.

1IftOCOI_ ....

• .,_OI_t

• ~OC~

• .......... UteM

[b)

••

, , , ,

Ie)

• V,.·"'1iIt IA II.or.,hd

• G.t.o.o ... ~

• ~111)1-..........

Id)

XXX~, ~~=~~I _

.,.. gP SG- - $"D-It/Jo~

~ He.fa./Lt'tG.."""'.,L

(e'

Flpn S.S Cross-sections. multin, levels aod aSlOC:itlld proces$C5 of III ,,· .. ell CMOS front.-end process.

You might also like