The document discusses the introduction and advantages of CMOS technology. It explains that CMOS emerged as a dominant IC technology in the 1970s due to its lower power consumption compared to MOS technology. CMOS circuits use both PMOS and NMOS transistors to achieve very low static power dissipation. The document outlines the operation and characteristics of CMOS inverters, and discusses the advantages CMOS provides including smaller gate sizes, higher packing density, wider voltage range, and better reliability compared to other technologies.
The document discusses the introduction and advantages of CMOS technology. It explains that CMOS emerged as a dominant IC technology in the 1970s due to its lower power consumption compared to MOS technology. CMOS circuits use both PMOS and NMOS transistors to achieve very low static power dissipation. The document outlines the operation and characteristics of CMOS inverters, and discusses the advantages CMOS provides including smaller gate sizes, higher packing density, wider voltage range, and better reliability compared to other technologies.
The document discusses the introduction and advantages of CMOS technology. It explains that CMOS emerged as a dominant IC technology in the 1970s due to its lower power consumption compared to MOS technology. CMOS circuits use both PMOS and NMOS transistors to achieve very low static power dissipation. The document outlines the operation and characteristics of CMOS inverters, and discusses the advantages CMOS provides including smaller gate sizes, higher packing density, wider voltage range, and better reliability compared to other technologies.
The document discusses the introduction and advantages of CMOS technology. It explains that CMOS emerged as a dominant IC technology in the 1970s due to its lower power consumption compared to MOS technology. CMOS circuits use both PMOS and NMOS transistors to achieve very low static power dissipation. The document outlines the operation and characteristics of CMOS inverters, and discusses the advantages CMOS provides including smaller gate sizes, higher packing density, wider voltage range, and better reliability compared to other technologies.
The power dissipation crisis of VLSI and how CMOS came to the rlssue
tf'1)S (mid 1970's): fast, dense and cheap (S1masks) -> dc steady current -) power drssioanon t wah of packing density -) ceramtc (not plastic) packages
CMOS (1963) is a Da1INANT IC TECHNOLOGY: gives lower power consumption in chips and in systems (I-Mbit t-l1OS DRAMs ~ 120 mW (-) • 50 mW tn
A CMOS I.avener: (.) the schemltlc Ind (b) lbe I-V charKteriSlics. ""VJ!"~r
/
Uri/I'! liNN I [.(116
VOtkf'::r t1~
o II.. "oo-IV .. I "011
V
~
T1!!llw,s IE '(T c.v tI!,e e. Itt-:r
bV~/n/fJ- s c..JX~
Fipn 4.. (I) DC tfansfer curves, and (b) output curreal "'. input yolt. CMOS invenen with yanous K..I~ ratios. where IC - (WIL)f'&.,./r .. (Rd. 3)
V1n • 0 (tf"K)S off PM)S on) or 5 V (Pt()S all ~S M --)
~ ~
Vout- VOO (S V) or 0 V (swinging from rajl to rajA
Stat1c voltage Input/output cnaractertsttc r-transrer cnaractertsttcs)
*Negligible output current (,zleakage current of the ort device) in the static mode, significant current during switching (charging of CL)
-Excellent noise margin t'l1L = VIL - VOL (~1.25 V)
('!f!)
t-I1H = VOH - VIH
llt-'
~
..
t 3
~ I
-t~ 3'
I
~.f
.....
~;
Vt
I.) ., ~ 0,1 i ''I ..
Voo
noise voltage at the output of the! inverter
-- -
tolerated at the input of the II inverter
II
\ I I
\ I /
~\ I IN
\ I I \ i
\ i
'3 3'
l. 6·S (I) Output (Va) versus input (VI> voltage of CMOS inverter. (b) Current through -erter u a function of input vollage (solid curve); I-V charlcteristics of n· and p-channel lUlston (duhed curves). The numbers correspond LO different points on the inverter nsfer characteristic.ll S
v
p-D
v (t)
..
I I I
, I -~------ 0
, I I t
_.....!.- -t-
I t, : ~ I r ,
F"I-u... T"I he- ~ I! 6 r, htf;
Fiprt •. 5 Input and output waveforms of I CMOS invener
• I In"erlfT #1
v .... ,
fnn;ul! I)
V .. lcin:uill 2 and J)
#2
_3
(hi
FIt. 6-6 ('l~\S..~' '~f inverters connecled in series. (b) Defutition of noiJc marlins.
Advantages of Q1)S
-De,vice Ichip performance
-Smatter gates ( 1/2 N'1OS 1nverter), in sene of 1s01at10n, due to Pt1)S:
2x wider ) ~S (E) but rf'1:)S (D) 4x larger) N'1OS (E)~ large packing density -) 'Ist,r systems (closer to bipolars)
-10 in 1dentical1y sized submicron devices PM:)S and N"K)S are the same dUt to velOCIty saturatIon
.Interconnection area -t -) transistor area is less important as is the input ceeacttance (Ct"K)S ) t-t1OS) -) N'1OS not faster anymore (power dissipation -) T t -) ~ degradation)
-0105 can operate over a wider range of VOO than tf10S
-Less bOdy-biasing senstttvtty (no bootstrapping for transferance of a
signal through a string of inverters) -Better hardness than 1n tf'1OS
-.oIiOl " .. ·IV
. ,
-n.,."(TAl."~"lE; , .
, , " ,
I ! I I i I II : I J 1 I ! TI
==t,l • i I , I , I I I ! I I , I r
,
~".':=T[ I : I I I ! I II
I I riff I i 1 , III [ i
lOW'"'OW! .. !
sc"Oi"T~Y n, !
~ "~EDC..os " "
I--"jf", " ADYAHCJD lOW·"OW[II
(, , 'SC..oTlOC' n, "I F .... 'IIIC.;__O A~~fO
II ,I .'I>CT 1 I • I ! I I
~II H' i I ! SC"OTTKO· Tlll'.Sl J
J'_: 11'ji11 I ~+
~' j...a I ! I SC~TOC~TTl ~
r .o.o.-OOCEO ~~,~.l ~ll.! .• I I
I I Ill," : tOIl ICl-~
i I I j II j 1/ ~ ,ooLL II CMf}!1; ~~ £~~~ ~(f~~.$
tWf'" f'.
tk~~ ~xu I
Ii!
1
0.1 0.2 O.S 1 2 5 10 20 50
b) Average POWI!: Dinipttion (mW)
Fla. 6·' (I) Ratio of p.channel saruration current to /I·chlNlel saturation current inc:re.ues IS !he effective channel ienath of !he devices shrinks. due to velocity Slturation effects. (b) Comparative speed I1Id power characteristics of various CMOS and bipolar Io,ic families.
,I
~
*R.li~bHlty
"'Low T (power dissipation) + reHabiHty
"LiSS hot-carrier degradat10n because of: the Pt1)S load, no stanc
current, no bootstrapping (t E -) hot-carrier degradation) ... Less electromigration (no static current)
-Sort error rates (SERs) of DRAMS and SRAMs .v I to 2 order of magnitude due to wells (reversed biased juncttons block carrIers generated in the substrate)
·Cost issues
-wafer fab: 20" higher than in t-I1OS due to more complex process
-25-75 ~ of the total cost Is due to packaging -) CMOS use cheaper
plastic
-no grinding at the back (grounding at the front stde) and no gold coating
Dlsadyantages *Short-channel and hot carrier effects as 1n ~S *Somewhat lower packing density
*larger lnput capacitance in static logic gates (n- and p-channel MOSFETs in
parallel)
*PMJS with n+-poly gates scaling and connecting *We 11 contacts required
·Well process (11' T, t)
*latchup and prevent Ion
*Electrostatic discharge damage
The well controversy in CMOS
The need for wells in O1OS -) po (well/substrate) junctions at V<O: p-type biased wjth (-) voltage and n-type biased with (+) voltage
D-well Ct1)S ((@~H~~Y '{;;/ffYIf P=-!?cs J
fbI
lei
Idl
ure 5.J Cross-section, Ind top \'1ews of I typical p-well CMOS process II IU slo; levell: (I) p-well mul;.: (b I Ictive area muk: (c:) poly ,lIe muk: (d) psk: (e) /I" mlSlt: (f) c:ontlcl milk: IDd (I) metal mask.
*Used where p-type region Should be isolated (BJT as an on-chip driver) *EasJer fabricatfon as it is less susceptible tha.n-weIJ to field-Inversion *Easler for retrograde-well process (later)
"IIHlS ('p-well) better for SRAMs due to lower soft-error rate (SER) 'l!~1~ ':.~1~
gy,,.. Ska.fe, -" 'I'
-~-) -"
(f)
(;1
a-wen CMOS
For all EPRCt1s, microprocessors and DRAMs tn 1.25- 2.0 J,1m technology stnce n-channel transistor 1s bu11t on the low doped substrate (tradlt1ons)
1)ot~Pt chann.1 nOI)
D-sublt,at.
~DIlrA-N"?'IIC,G :
.. eoN~~/qLE lJl'rn NiY@,J '!rE(f;#tftft;&@t$, ~
fillirr 5." Cross-secuon of a finjsh~d 11·",'(11 CMOS structure .... uh >clf·ali~ned p. !ypc ch.mnel $lOp.