Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Deletions From Cumulative qualifies. However, the Service is not be deductible.

Protection under section


List of Organizations precluded from disallowing a deduction 7428(c) would begin on May 15, 2006, and
Contributions to Which for any contributions made after an or­ would end on the date the court first deter­
ganization ceases to qualify under section mines that the organization is not described
are Deductible Under Section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely in section 170(c)(2) as more particularly
170 of the Code filed a suit for declaratory judgment under set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For indi­
section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had vidual contributors, the maximum deduc­
Announcement 2006–33 knowledge of the revocation of the ruling tion protected is $1,000, with a husband
or determination letter, (2) was aware that and wife treated as one contributor. This
The name of an organization that no such revocation was imminent, or (3) was benefit is not extended to any individual, in
longer qualifies as an organization de­ in part responsible for or was aware of the whole or in part, for the acts or omissions
scribed in section 170(c)(2) of the Internal activities or omissions of the organization of the organization that were the basis for
Revenue Code of 1986 is listed below. that brought about this revocation. revocation.
Generally, the Service will not disallow If on the other hand a suit for declara­
deductions for contributions made to a tory judgment has been timely filed, con­ Parents & Friends for
listed organization on or before the date tributions from individuals and organiza­ Better Education, Inc.
of announcement in the Internal Revenue tions described in section 170(c)(2) that Houma, LA
Bulletin that an organization no longer are otherwise allowable will continue to

2006–20 I.R.B. 914 May 15, 2006

You might also like