This document discusses Gross National Happiness (GNH), which was introduced by Bhutan as an alternative to solely using GDP as a measure of economic progress and societal well-being. It outlines some key parameters for measuring GNH, including income, health, education, and well-being. It then discusses how Bhutan has implemented GNH through new decision-making structures, political party platforms, and media coverage of GNH issues. The document also notes some challenges to adopting GNH in large countries like India, such as population size, poverty levels, and difficulties measuring GNH parameters and enabling international comparisons of well-being.
This document discusses Gross National Happiness (GNH), which was introduced by Bhutan as an alternative to solely using GDP as a measure of economic progress and societal well-being. It outlines some key parameters for measuring GNH, including income, health, education, and well-being. It then discusses how Bhutan has implemented GNH through new decision-making structures, political party platforms, and media coverage of GNH issues. The document also notes some challenges to adopting GNH in large countries like India, such as population size, poverty levels, and difficulties measuring GNH parameters and enabling international comparisons of well-being.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document discusses Gross National Happiness (GNH), which was introduced by Bhutan as an alternative to solely using GDP as a measure of economic progress and societal well-being. It outlines some key parameters for measuring GNH, including income, health, education, and well-being. It then discusses how Bhutan has implemented GNH through new decision-making structures, political party platforms, and media coverage of GNH issues. The document also notes some challenges to adopting GNH in large countries like India, such as population size, poverty levels, and difficulties measuring GNH parameters and enabling international comparisons of well-being.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
• Kumud Chandra (Roll No.20 ) • Nillohit (Roll No.30 ) • Sandeep Hishikar (Roll No.40 ) • Sulabh Manchanda (Roll No.50 ) • Sami Khan (Roll No. 60) Economics as if people mattered
• Well-being - People’s experience of their
quality of life • What do we mean by well-being? • Measuring happiness and well-being • Re-thinking progress
• What can governments do?
General Parameters for GNH • Per capita income • Life expectancy • Infant and maternal mortality rates • Health coverage • School enrolment • Literacy rates • Social, emotional , physical &financial well being GNH - A rational and human approach to development
• GNH stand for holistic need of the human
• GNH seeks to promote a conscious, inner search for happiness. • GNH recognises that happiness not as competition against each other but for all. GNH in context of Bhutan • New institutional structures and decision-making processes that better reflect GNH • Presentation of action plans or manifestos of political parties and prospective candidates with GNH as their organizing principle. • Steady coverage of GNH issues by TV and newspapers, both national and international • Elaboration of GNH as a sound concept and the construction of GNH indicators for application in plan and policy formulation. FOUR PILLARS of Bhutan GNH
• Sustainable and equitable socio-economic
development • Conservation of the environment • Preservation and promotion of culture • Good governance Possibilities of GNH in India and its challenges • Remote possibility of promoting GNH • Large population • Huge no. of population still below the poverty line. • Gap between rural and urban India • Validity of Parameters of measuring GNH • Too huge an exercise International approach to GNH • Not widely accepted even after 3 decades of its inception in Bhutan • No international consensus or collaboration for promoting and establishing GNH • International comparison of well-being will be difficult on this model • Social and individual well-being are remarkably transcultural Future of GNH • GNH as a potential support for GDP • GNH to be developed as a more comprehensive indicator • Parameters to be redefined • Measurement of parameters to be redefined • To be developed as over all tool for accountability THANK