Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

nigel davis/london

RIDING THE rollercoaster of soaring


energy and commodity prices, global chemi-
cal industry players performed remarkably
well in 2007. Most of the sector continued
to bask in good times, with demand growth
still high, but the US downturn began to
bite, and, for some, life was harder.
In this issue, ICIS Chemical Business casts
a sharp eye over the financial performance
of the leading players in the industry
– from the broad-based to the focused
makers of chemicals, fertilizers and indus-
trial gases.
The ICIS Top 100 Chemical Companies
includes all chemical firms with annual sales
greater than $2.5bn (€1.8bn). It charts the
fortunes of a geographically diverse group of
players that supply vitally important materi-
als to the world’s growing industries.
The ICIS Top 100 analysis captures a
broad set of financial data for the world’s
leading chemical companies.
A total of 18 financial metrics are col-
lected from the companies themselves, from
annual reports and other sources. An array
of ratios is generated from this data. The
analysis looks at the 100 leading companies
by sales, but data are also collected for
smaller players to facilitate regional analyses.
We gather corporate, rather than divi-
sional data for most firms to help with a
broader ratio analysis. But for the major oil
and energy producers, we look at the chemi-
cal operations only.
In 2007, the sector benefited from con-
tinued strong demand growth, particularly
from the fast-developing economies in Asia,
most notably China. Chemical demand from
Central and Eastern Europe and from Latin
America was also robust.
Much has been written about the impact
on the sector of the sharp economic slow-
down in the US, and in North America as
The ICIS Top 100 Chemical Companies a whole. The sharp downturn in the vitally
important US home construction and auto
saw the good times roll in 2007, sectors hit the industry hard, and continues
but 2008 brings a more challenging to do so.
But the impact, largely in the second half
environment, testing their mettle of the year, was masked, to a great extent, by
product and geographical diversity.
The analysis demonstrates clearly that the
world’s major chemical producers continued
to grow strongly in 2007. It is not so read-
ily apparent, however, that the momentum
behind that growth has weakened.
Companies captured volume increases
alongside all-important price gains. Shifting

18  ICIS Chemical Business  |  September 15-21, 2008  |  www.icis.com


currency exchange rates also had an impact SABIC acquired US-based GE Plastics stronger cash flows down to the bottom line.
on the reported results, particularly the later in the year, while Givaudan had earlier Dividend payouts increased and more firms
weakening of the US dollar and the strength- acquired Quest, the UK-based ICI’s fra- used excess cash to pay down debt and/or to
ening of the euro. grances business. accelerate share buybacks.
The ICIS Top 100 table shows company It was, however, volume and, to a greater The year was one in which more compa-
results in US dollars, with year-on-year com- extent, price that drove the top line of most nies had more room to maneuver and were
parisons made in local currencies. Financial firms over the course of the year. able not so much to flex financial muscle in
year-end exchange rates are used throughout. Chemical demand globally continued to terms of acquisitions, but to be astute in terms
Given the significant weakening of the US be strong in 2007. And although growth of growth, investment, and regard for share-


dollar in 2007, however, for the first time, holders. Despite the still good times, players
this year, sales changes are given in the table continued to focus on efficiencies in 2007,
in local currencies.
The average increase in sales in the diverse Volume and, to a greater illustrating the more cautious mind set of
management. As costs rose, they were mind-
chemical sector was 10.8% in 2007 in local extent, price… drove the ful of the prospects of an industry downturn.
currency terms and 18.1% when converted
back to US dollars. top line of most firms Mountain of new capacity
The most impressive gains were made The upstream petrochemical business and
by the fertilizer and agrochemical majors, slowed markedly in the US later in the year, commodity polymer makers expect soon to
as might be expected, given the significant demand remained buoyant in Europe and face the consequences of a mountain of new
run-up in food and fertilizer prices over the especially strong in the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, production capacity due on stream in the
course of the year. India and China) nations. The year was col- Middle East and in Asia.
Those commodity price increases colored ored by the sharply rising cost of oil. The center of gravity of this end of the
the analysis for 2007 and underpin the main Oil-based feedstock costs rose sharply, as business, as well as many more specialized
features of the industry performance analy- did the burden of energy costs on all play- chemical segments, is shifting eastward as
sis to be published in the September 29 issue ers. Companies were quick to pass on these chemical demand growth patterns change,
of ICIS Chemical Business. higher costs, particularly those operating at and as new producers tap into sources of
The world’s largest processed phosphate the top of the chain and closest to fast-  low-cost gas-based feedstocks.
fertilizer producer, US-based Mosaic, rising and volatile feedstock naphtha. The emergence of lower-cost capacities, in
reported one of the strongest year-on-year Natural gas prices also climbed throughout particular, will affect the performance of all
sales increases for its financial year ended on the year, putting a burden on producers of olefins and polyolefins players. Less efficient
May 31, 2008. The company’s results overall olefins and other materials. facilities will be hard pressed to make money
demonstrated the fact that the fertilizer The momentum gained in the industry as sector operating rates are lowered. They
upturn continued strongly into 2008. in recent years was also widely apparent in are also likely to be saddled with high and
Norway’s Yara, Saudi Arabia’s SABIC, and 2007 profit performance. Operating profits volatile feedstock and energy costs.
Switzerland’s Givaudan were among the in the sector climbed by more than 12%. Net The petrochemical firms were exposed in
companies to have grown most strongly in profits significantly improved. 2008 and particularly in the second quarter,
2007, the latter two boosted by acquisitions. Many companies were able to push as oil prices topped $147/bbl. ❯❯

Where are they now?


Just how much has the chemical industry changed over the past five years? The answer is a great
top 10 in 2002 deal, and there is likely to be more to come. The industry Top 10 has been shape-shifted by sector
restructuring and the emergence of new players. Producers from the Middle East, China and India have
Company Sales
become more important and certainly bigger in a global sense.
$m % change
The chemical industry was in a very different place in 2002. Companies started the year on
BASF 33,778 -0.9 something of a high note, but were soon mired in difficulties.
Bayer 31,061 -2.2 This quotation from our Top 100 report at the time is apposite: “If 2002 demonstrated anything,
Dow Chemical 27,434 -1.3 it showed that many companies would have to continue to do a great deal in terms of cost control and
DuPont 24,006 -2.9 restructuring to squeeze more from less. As the year progressed, it rapidly became clear that earlier
Atofina 20,626 -1.5 economic growth and manufacturing industry optimism were not sufficient to carry the day.”
ExxonMobil 20,310 5.2
The year 2007 was markedly different, and the past few years have demonstrated just what
chemical companies can do in terms of performance. Yet, as further features in our Top 100 analysis

2002 to now
Akzo Nobel 14,681 -0.8
series will show, times continue to change – and fast.
Mitsubishi Chemical 14,224 6.0
The rapid and unprecedented run-up in the price of oil has hit the sector hard. The credit crunch
a look back
BP
Degussa
12,507
12,336
10.9
-0.8
and US economic downturn are having a global knock-on effect. There are great uncertainties for
players in chemicals that are exposed to strong global forces. In 2008, companies are challenged to
SOURCE: ICIS continue to perform in trying and, once again, difficult times.

www.icis.com  |  September 15-21, 2008  |  ICIS Chemical Business  19


THE ICIS TOP 100

THE ICIS TOP 100


Sales Operating profit Net profit Total assets R&D Capital spending Employees
Company $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change Number % change
local currency $
1 BASF 85,353 10.2 22.9 10,775 20.9 5,987 41.1 68,932 15.3 2,033 20.3 6,517 -50.8 95,175 -0.1
2 Dow Chemical 53,513 8.9 8.9 4,229 -14.9 2,887 -22.5 48,801 7.1 1,305 12.1 2,075 16.9 45,856 7.7
3 ExxonMobil b 53,417 9.1 9.1 5,546 -3.3 4,563 4.1 21,418 9.6 273 8.3 1,782 135.7 12,965 0.2
4 Shell b 45,911 12.7 12.7 2,447 106.8 2,051 92.8 20,310 14.9 – – 1,419 61.8 8,500 0.0
5 LyondellBasell Industries c 44,735 n/a 24.0 1,826 -3.2 168 -69.5 – – – – – – 16,000 -9.1
6 INEOS 40,527 3.5 15.5 1,783 46.5 488 221.1 14,153 8.9 127 22.7 – – 16,600 10.7
7 SABIC 33,724 46.2 46.5 10,968 33.2 7,221 33.4 68,474 54.1 – – – – 31,000 63.2
8 Sinopec b 32,999 12.0 19.7 – – – – 16,655 17.6 – – 2,219 37.0 70,712 -8.4
9 Mitsubishi Chemical d 29,532 11.7 34.0 1,260 16.7 1,654 96.2 27,880 43.1 1,130 47.5 1,714 55.9 39,305 17.5
10 DuPont 29,378 7.1 7.1 3,743 12.4 2,988 -5.1 34,131 7.4 1,338 2.8 1,585 3.5 60,000 1.7
11 Total b 29,170 3.6 15.6 1,701 6.0 1,248 6.9 – – – – – – 45,810 2.5
12 Bayer e 25,890 2.0 13.8 2,342 22.4 – – 35,580 5.0 1,293 12.5 1,912 24.5 54,700 0.2
13 AkzoNobelc 21,271 – – 1,361 – 1,172 – 37,192 – – – – – 42,600 –
14 Evonik f 21,253 2.2 14.0 1,367 76.7 1,290 -6.6 29,162 5.4 452 13.0 1,520 23.1 43,057 -7.3
15 Yara International 19,420 52.0 52.0 – – – – – – – – – – 8,173 15.8
16 Sumitomo Chemical d 19,117 6.0 27.1 1,032 -12.0 636 -19.4 23,778 21.7 1,062 29.4 1,437 7.0 25,588 3.6
17 Mitsui Chemicals d 18,010 5.8 27.0 778 1.0 250 -43.1 14,810 17.7 424 36.9 854 39.8 12,814 2.4
18 Linde g 17,614 15.2 28.5 3,762 29.1 – – – – 143 17.6 1,632 47.3 45,214 2.0
19 ChemChina (CNCC) q 17,400 69.6 69.6 – – – – – – – – – – 100,000 0.0
20 Air Liquide 17,381 7.8 20.2 2,648 63.9 1,654 25.0 26,941 25.2 – – – – 40,000 8.4
21 Asahi Kasei d 17,104 4.5 25.4 1,287 19.8 705 22.4 14,368 17.1 566 28.5 836 17.8 23,854 0.6
22 Toray d 16,629 6.7 28.0 1,043 21.1 485 -1.5 17,118 21.7 – – 1,495 47.7 38,565 5.5
23 Johnson Matthey d 14,961 21.9 24.1 586 18.7 – – 5,199 27.0 – – – – 7,800 11.4
24 Shin-Etsu d 13,874 5.5 26.6 2,894 42.9 1,850 43.0 19,339 23.7 483 37.8 2,706 52.9 20,241 5.5
25 Reliance Industries d/j 13,210 14.0 14.0 1,773 17.2 – – – – – – 126 18.9 – –
26 DSM 12,898 4.8 17.0 1,212 10.0 632 -12.5 14,475 8.6 548 19.6 700 16.0 23,254 5.0
27 Chevron Phillips Chemical 12,534 5.9 5.9 820 -43.2 719 -46.7 7,232 1.6 42 5.0 314 64.4 5,000 -2.9
28 LG Chem 11,551 16.3 14.1 817 122.7 734 113.0 7,543 19.1 – – – – 10,000 0.0
29 BP 11,000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
30 DIC (was Dainippon Inks & Chemicals) d 10,865 6.1 26.1 488 11.9 313 64.2 9,861 17.2 – – – – 25,167 -1.8
31 Braskem 10,646 11.0 33.8 854 132.5 321 485.3 – – – – – – 5,000 0.0
32 Merck KGaA 10,394 12.3 25.3 1,438 -1.5 – – 21,978 105.5 1,514 86.5 417 24.8 30,968 21.3
33 Solvay e 10,282 2.7 14.6 1,233 42.8 – – – – 208 13.2 1,037 19.5 19,162 0.0
34 Polimeri Europaj 10,213 1.6 13.4 298 31.0 334 45.5 – – – – 214 63.4 6,534 8.4
35 PPG Industries k 10,177 13.6 13.6 1,266 1.5 – – – – 354 10.3 – – 24,900 -9.5
36 Air Products o 10,038 14.7 14.7 1,408 33.3 1,036 43.3 12,660 13.2 140 -7.3 – – 22,100 6.8
37 Mosaic l 9,813 70.0 70.0 2,807 356 2,083 396 10,118 15 – – – – 7,000 -13
38 LANXESS 9,733 -4.8 6.2 317 -36.2 165 -36.6 5,964 7.4 128 10.3 418 18.7 14,610 -11.4
39 Sekisui Chemical d 9,664 3.5 24.2 434 14.3 245 14.2 7,892 6.8 258 25.4 316 3.4 18,907 0.0
40 Huntsman 9,651 10.5 10.5 536 -16.9 -172 n/a – – 145 26.1 665 20.9 13,000 -7.1
41 Praxair 9,402 13.0 13.0 1,786 17.6 1,177 19.1 13,382 20.5 98 12.6 1,376 25.1 27,992 3.5
42 Borealis 9,353 10.6 23.4 664 42.5 362 -16.2 6,821 40.7 72 21.5 673 117.9 5,060 10.0
43 Syngenta 9,240 14.8 14.8 1,464 76.6 1,109 74.9 13,280 12.1 830 4.3 317 46.1 21,200 8.7
44 Rohm and Haas 8,897 8.1 8.1 2,467 -0.6 661 -10.1 10,208 6.9 296 3.5 417 3.2 15,710 -0.7
45 NPC (Iran) d 8,388 69.8 69.8 1,184 71.6 235 -15.0 27,624 29.4 36 9.1 2,255 27.2 18,079 6.4
46 Arkema 8,358 0.2 11.8 326 128.3 183 194.3 6,534 10.1 233 4.9 479 7.9 15,200 -10.6
47 Tosoh d 8,340 5.9 27.0 596 17.6 254 6.1 8,235 24.3 – – 733 957.3 11,088 5.5
48 Sherwin-Williams 8,005 2.5 2.5 – – 616 6.9 4,855 -2.8 37 0.0 166 -21.0 31,572 2.6
49 SK Energy j 7,938 35.3 32.7 543 10.7 – – – – – – 171 -24.3 – –
50 Clariant 7,581 5.3 14.1 479 -1.4 4 -106.9 6,472 9.7 187 10.4 277 -5.6 20,931 -3.8

20  ICIS Chemical Business  |  September 15-21, 2008  |  www.icis.com


THE ICIS TOP 100 continued
Sales Operating profit Net profit Total assets R&D Capital spending Employees
Company $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change Number % change
local currency $
51 Rhodia 7,484 5.6 17.8 660 39.2 193 121.4 6,595 -3.1 141 4.0 477 16.2 15,500 -3.1
52 Formosa Chemicals & Fibre n 7,398 n/a 32.5 – – 1,558 48.5 11,554 26.2 – – – – 5,620 -3.6
53 Repsol YPF j 7,255 3.1 15.0 340 -27.0 – – – – – – – – 3,258 1.4
54 Eastman Chemical 6,830 0.8 0.8 504 -22.9 300 -26.7 6,009 -2.0 156 0.6 518 33.2 10,800 -1.8
55 PKN Orlen b/j 6,741 1.2 20.4 537 46.6 – – – – – – 261 54.1 – –
56 NOVA Chemicals 6,732 3.3 3.3 553 n/a 347 n/a 4,836 18.6 50 -2.0 156 -21.2 2,820 -14.5
57 Sasol h/p 6,708 19.2 34.7 282 n/a – – – – – – – – 6,848 -11.1
58 Celanese 6,444 11.5 11.5 748 20.6 426 4.9 8,058 2.1 73 12.3 288 18.0 8,400 -5.6
59 Hexion 5,810 11.6 11.6 302 5.6 -65 -31.6 4,006 14.2 70 1.4 122 0.0 6,400 -7.2
60 Ciba 5,795 2.7 11.2 386 1.7 211 n/a 7,807 4.8 233 5.1 238 23.0 13,319 -5.7
61 Formosa Plastics n 5,598 n/a 23.7 – – 1,562 58.6 10,479 19.9 – – – – 4,927 0.4
62 Wacker-Chemie 5,569 13.3 26.4 959 58.6 622 51.4 5,771 34.2 225 11.9 1,030 48.5 15,044 2.6
63 Pemex j 5,296 92.5 90.6 -1,204 n/a -1,356 -24.5 – – – – – – – –
64 Agrium 5,270 25.7 25.7 715 893 441 1236 5,839 78.8 – – 454 117.2 6,618 1.0
65 Mitsubishi Gas Chemical d 5,235 7.6 29.1 477 34.6 405 20.5 6,062 18.3 – – – – 2,151 -0.4
66 Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan 5,234 38.9 38.9 – – 988 56.3 9,717 56.3 – – 607 19.3 5,003 2.7
67 Cognis 5,181 4.3 16.4 272 0.2 -177 n/a 3,689 5.9 134 8.0 194 47.3 7,585 -1.7
68 Kaneka d 5,070 6.3 27.5 360 17.0 190 22.9 4,562 16.3 – – 318 6.5 7,498 0.9
69 Dow Corning 4,943 12.5 12.5 – – 690 3.3 7,199 20.5 – – – – 10,000 11.1
70 K+S 4,925 13.1 26.1 -157 n/a -137 n/a 4,367 16.8 23 23.5 253 47.0 12,033 1.3
71 Orica o 4,910 3.1 22.7 722 47.0 434 7.7 5,511 29.2 28 13.5 – – 14,174 5.3
72 Honeywell r 4,866 5.1 5.1 – – 658 15.8 – – – – 215 15.6 – –
73 Sibur j 4,846 11.8 20.1 1,282 15.7 – – – – – – 267 28.8 – –
74 Occidental Chemical b 4,664 -3.1 -3.1 – – 601 -33.7 3,814 0.3 – – – – 3,100 -1.9
75 Lubrizol 4,499 11.3 11.3 283 57.6 283 172.1 4,644 5.8 219 6.6 183 39.6 6,921 2.6
76 Cementhai Chemicals 4,374 6.2 27.1 462 -6.2 570 15.7 4,139 34.9 – – – – – –
77 Showa Denko s 4,275 15.7 22.7 241 33.3 – – 3,391 5.3 – – 95 -24.8 2,078 -8.6
78 Kemira 4,139 11.4 24.3 211 -17.8 99 -32.8 4,165 13.9 97 44.4 473 -22.5 10,007 7.3
79 JSR d 4,102 11.2 33.5 605 30.3 373 31.9 4,203 22.3 – – – – 5,122 9.1
80 Israel Chemical 4,100 25.8 25.8 715 33.4 536 43.3 4,633 28.4 39 11.4 195 35.4 9,914 6.5
81 ALPEK (Grupo Alfa) 4,007 17.5 17.5 177 -25.6 80 -51.5 3,057 18.6 – – 182 -42.4 4,166 3.5
82 Ashland t/o 3,923 17.6 17.6 191 81.9 – – – – 50 4.2 125 -10.1 – –
83 Nalco 3,913 8.6 8.6 207 24.4 129 30.3 5,979 5.7 – – 115 23.7 11,500 3.6
84 Petronas j 3,844 14.4 14.4 – – – – – – – – 246 95.2 – –
85 Chemtura 3,747 8.4 8.4 59 1080 3 n/a 4,416 0.4 62 1.6 117 -8.6 5,144 -17.0
86 Kuraray d/s 3,720 8.4 14.9 429 26.9 2 -98.9 4,369 2.2 – – 380 20.1 6,770 -0.6
87 Givaudan 3,671 42.0 53.8 – – 84 -75.3 7,016 81.9 – – – – 8,776 44.9
88 RPM l 3,644 9.1 9.1 – – 48 -76.9 3,764 12.9 – – 72 2.9 9,400 0.0
89 Tessenderlo Group 3,544 7.5 19.9 224 135.5 190 n/a 2,479 10.1 40 7.6 145 -7.6 8,121 -0.0
90 Quattor Participacoes c 3,536 n/a n/a – – 282 n/a – – – – – – – –
91 Solutia 3,535 26.5 26.5 190 118.4 -208 n/a 2,640 28.2 37 0.0 150 42.9 6,000 17.6
92 Cytec Industries 3,504 5.2 5.2 324 6.2 192 14.3 4,062 6.0 76 2.7 115 12.0 6,800 1.5
93 Ube d 3,293 9.4 31.2 330 55.7 – – – – – – – – 11,058 2.1
94 Valspar u 3,249 9.1 9.1 310 0.8 172 -1.7 3,452 8.2 90 8.4 9,946 4.1
95 Asahi Glass b 3,219 3.8 24.6 126 90.4 – – 2,857 16.7 – – 262 20.4 4,857 0.5
96 Westlake Chemical 3,192 28.5 28.5 271 -31.6 115 -40.9 2,569 23.4 7 16.3 136 0.0 2,120 3.1
97 W.R. Grace 3,115 10.2 10.2 – – 80 338.8 3,869 6.4 80 21.2 137 15.1 6,500 -1.5
98 Denki Kagaku Kogyo (Denka) 2,933 6.9 13.4 266 21.5 140 8.6 3,653 4.5 – – – – 4,696 -0.9
99 IRPC j/m 2,822 17.1 40.2 – – 173 36.4 1,182 25.8 – – – – – –
100 Hanwha Chemical 2,659 12.0 9.9 179 43.4 228 1.9 3,884 16.8 27 35.9 – – 1,875 1.1

www.icis.com  |  September 15-21, 2008  |  ICIS Chemical Business  21


THE ICIS TOP 100

THE ICIS TOP 100 – bubbling under


Sales Operating profit Net profit Total assets R&D Capital spending Employees
Company $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change $m % change Number % change
local currency $
101 PolyOne 2,643 0.8 0.8 34 -82.2 11 -91.1 1,583 -11.1 22 10.0 43 4.9 4,800 2.8
102 FMC 2,633 12.2 12.2 228 -9.1 132 0.8 2,733 -0.3 95 -2.1 115 -0.9 5,000 0.0
103 Cabot o 2,616 2.9 2.9 187 48.4 129 46.6 2,636 4.0 69 19.0 141 -25.0 4,300 0.0
104 PTT Chemical (PTTCH) 2,590 4.5 25.1 773 20.2 644 25.5 4,485 43.4 – – – – 2,451 2.7
105 Lonza 2,550 -1.5 6.6 363 28.4 267 46.8 4,398 37.0 79 26.8 – – 7,711 25.5
106 Momentive Performance Materials 2,500 3.6 3.6 82 -18.7 -254 586.5 – – 79 -1.8 – – 5,000 0.0
107 Honam Petrochemical 2,413 3.4 1.4 – – – – – – – – – – – –
108 Albemarle 2,336 -1.4 -1.4 – – 233 15.9 2,831 11.9 63 37.0 – – 4,100 17.1
109 IFF 2,277 8.7 8.7 – – 247 9.1 2,727 10.0 199 7.0 – – 5,315 4.5
110 Hercules 2,136 5.0 5.0 264 6.0 179 -25.1 2,678 -4.6 44 12.8 108 14.9 4,661 5.2
111 Mexichem j 2,115 121 119 399 72.6 169 53.2 – – – – – – – –
112 Compania Espanola de Petroleos 2,105 -6.5 4.3 – – – – – – – – – – 9,000 0.0
FOOTNOTES to tables f Evonik was formerly known as Degussa Companies excluded and reason
a Key financial year-end exchange rates used for 2007 data g Linde gas & engineering figures only. Prior year 2006 figures Koch Does not segment chemical data
(2006 in parentheses): $/€ 1.473 (1.32), Yen/$ 99.2 (119.0), include 12 months of BOC OMV Includes petrochemical operations in its refining and market-
$/£ 1.995 (1.959) h Financial year end June 30, 2007 ing segment
b Chemical segment figures only. Includes intersegment rev- i Estimated figures, as BP does not segment chemical data Shanghai Petrochemical Majority owned by Sinopec
enues, e.g. revenue for sales to other divisions of by-products. j Petrochemical figures only Samsung Total Petrochemicals $4bn sales equity accounted in
For ExxonMobil, intersegment revenue was $16.591bn in k PPG Industries includes performance, industrial, commodity Total and Samsung figures
2007 and $14.846bn in 2006. Sinopec = external sales and glass segment figures (does not include optical figures) China Bluestar Chem Majority owned by ChemChina
with intersegment sales. Total restated figures to exclude the l Financial year end May 31, 2008 Formosa Plastic Corp. USA Not segmented in Formosa reports
contribution from Arkema m IRPC was formerly known as Thai Petrochemical Formosa Petrochemical Corp. Does not segment chemicals
c Pro forma results for 2007. Lyondell and Basell completed a n Net profit is pretax from refining business
$19.4bn (€13.6bn) merger. 2006 figures based on the sum of o Financial year end September 30, 2007 Nan Ya Plastics Sales are for both chemicals and processed items
Lyondell and Basell. AkzoNobel = pro forma results. AkzoNobel ac- p Sasol turnover figures from polymers, solvents, olefins and Yeochon NCC Results included with Hanwha and Daelim
quired ICI in January 2008. Quattor Participacoes = a joint venture surfactants added together Daelim Below top 100 in sales as Yeochon NCC accounted as
between Unipar and Petrobras launched on June 12, 2008. q Estimated as data not published by ChemChina equity company
d F inancial year end March 31, 2008 r Specialty materials figures used Samsung Does not consolidate various chemical company interests
e Bayer data excludes HealthCare division, with 2007 sales of s Petrochemical and chemical segment figures used into one area
€14.8bn. Solvay data excludes pharmaceutical business, with t Ashland excludes distribution business PTT Group Results included as IRPC and PTTCH businesses
€2.6bn sales in 2007 u Valspar financial year end October 31, 2007

❯❯ In 2008, global GDP forecasts and   was 5.5%. Operating margins increased The top players in chemicals are focused
subsequently chemical sector forecasts were markedly for US-based specialty chemical on lifting value added by operating more
also lowered. The industry has come off   firm Chemtura and fertilizer producers efficiently and delivering greater value to
its plateau of earnings performance and is Agrium in Canada, as well as Mosaic in the customers. The commodity players do that
facing an increasingly tough global operat- US. French chemical giant Arkema’s operat- by maintaining plant efficiencies and logis-
ing environment. ing return more than doubled. tics networks. The specialty chemical com-
First-half 2008 performance has held up panies work more closely with customers.
relatively well, particularly for the more spe- M&A and the Credit crunch The analysis also looks at capital expen-
cialized players and those not overly exposed Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) reached a ditures and researach and development
to the US. The second-half outlook, however, peak in 2007 in value terms, if not in total (R&D) spending. Not surprisingly, capital
is not strong, number of deals. The credit crunch took its spending was higher in 2007 than in 2006,
toll, but chemical deals have continued. as profitability improved.
efficiency drives gains Some of the largest in recent history took Research spending varied greatly in the
In 2007, sales per employee in the industry place in 2007, including the SABIC/GE sector, with R&D/sales ratios of between
improved by more than 9%, reflecting sales Plastics deal, and the merger between 0.5% and close to 9%.
growth but also the focus of many firms on Netherlands-based Basell and US-based The increase in spending in 2007 by
employee costs. Selling, general and admin- Lyondell Chemical. Other focused acquisi- some of the biggest companies in the
istrative costs for the group of companies tions reinforced the strength of companies industry is noteworthy as greater emphasis
for which the data were available increased such as UK chemical firm INEOS. was placed on organic growth in changing
only slightly. The year 2007 was one of consolida- industry times. ■
The drive to greater efficiencies was tion for the sector. M&A has been less
reflected in the overall improvement in pronounced in 2008 but the industry is still ❯❯ The ICIS Top 100 table is based upon the
profits ratios. Net returns in 2007 in the Top enlivened by the moves of major players ICIS annual analysis of the performance of the
world’s leading chemical companies. Further
100 improved by 11%. Operating profit data such as US-based Dow Chemical to focus
details of this analysis are available from Lara
were available for fewer companies on the on value-added specialty areas of business Mcnamee: lara.mcnamee@icis.com
list but the average operating return increase and move away from commodities.

22  ICIS Chemical Business  |  September 15-21, 2008  |  www.icis.com

You might also like