RM Final

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Group No 2

Group members
Bhavya ajmera
Snehi kothari
Ankur jain
Tarun lalwani
Viral jain
Ankita sonawane
Vaishali supekar
Abhishek kothari
Hitesh karamchandani
Null Hypothesis

Private labels are not performing better than the


retail labels (i.e. 40% growth in the sales of private
labels) and that is performed similarly.
Alternative Hypothesis

Due to absence of brands in certain product


categories at affordable prices, introduction of
private labels in this categories would be 15 – 25%
cheaper than the inhouse (national or retail) brand.
Sample and Population Mean

In Population Mean, close to 80% of modern retail


customers are repeats and its natural for them to
develop faith in the retailer’s own brands.

As per Sample Mean, Spencer’s sells private labels in


60% of around 650product categories and
private labels contribute a quarter of its sales for
Lifestyle International.
Sample & Population Variance

As per sample variance, UK retailer Tesco gets half


its revenue from private labels.

As per Population variance, the deviation shows that


customers have started to trust the retailer’s brands
than established brands.
Parametric & Non Parametric Test

For this topic I have attached a WORD file also, just


go thru it
Thank-u

You might also like