Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To or For
To or For
The book is the real object of this sentence. It tells us what she gave.
"Book" is the direct object (D.O.)
"ME" is the indirect object (l.O.)
Note: that it is not possible to use the second form when the direct object is a pronoun
(me, her, him, it, etc]. The longer construction must be used:
Give it to John. (NOT Give John it.)
James = Subject
Gave = Verb
Michael = Indirect Object
A Cd = Direct Object
Subject + Verb + Direct Object + Phrase with to/for
James = Subject
Gave = Verb
A Cd = Direct Object
to Michael = Phrase with to/for (Indirect Object)
TO OR FOR
With "say" the indirect object is used instead. (To me, to her, to us, etc)
"I don´t like them very much" She said to me quietly
FOR can be used to talk about somebody's purpose in doing something, but only when
it is followed by a noun.
We stopped at the pub for a drink.
I went to the college for an interview with Professor Taylor.
(A drink, an interview are nouns)
You cannot use for before a verb in this sense. The infinitive alone is used to express a
person's purpose.
We stopped at the pub to have a drink
I went to the college to see Professor Taylor
You can use for before "ing" to express the "purpose" of a thing (what it is used for)
especially when the thing is the subject of the clause.
But when the clause has a person as subject, it is more common to use an infinitive to
express the purpose of a thing.