This rubric evaluates reports on a device with criteria in five areas: device information, historical evolution, contributions to engineering, references, and writing quality. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores given for more detailed, thorough, and professionally written responses that meet formatting guidelines. The total score is out of 45 points.
This rubric evaluates reports on a device with criteria in five areas: device information, historical evolution, contributions to engineering, references, and writing quality. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores given for more detailed, thorough, and professionally written responses that meet formatting guidelines. The total score is out of 45 points.
This rubric evaluates reports on a device with criteria in five areas: device information, historical evolution, contributions to engineering, references, and writing quality. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores given for more detailed, thorough, and professionally written responses that meet formatting guidelines. The total score is out of 45 points.
This rubric evaluates reports on a device with criteria in five areas: device information, historical evolution, contributions to engineering, references, and writing quality. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores given for more detailed, thorough, and professionally written responses that meet formatting guidelines. The total score is out of 45 points.
Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Level 0 The device is The device is The device is The device is Detail about the Device described with a high described with described with described with limited device is missing. Information degree of detail. considerable detail. moderate detail. detail. (5) 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1 0 Historical evolution is Historical evolution is Historical evolution is Historical evolution is Historical evolution is discussed with high discussed with discussed with discussed with limited unclear. Research of Historical detail. Device considerable detail. moderate detail. detail. Device the device is missing. Evolution evolution is supported Device evolution is Device evolution is evolution is supported with strong research. supported with strong supported with weak with weak research (10) research. research 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 0 Thorough discussion Considerable Moderate discussion Limited discussion of Discussion of the Contributions of the contributions discussion of the of the contributions the contributions contributions made to to made to engineering contributions made to made to engineering made to engineering engineering through through time. engineering through through time. through time. time is missing. Engineering time. (15) 15 14 13 12 11.5 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 6 3 0 All or most of the Many of the Some of the Few of the None of the referencing referencing referencing referencing referencing requirements have requirements have requirements have requirements have requirements have been met (i.e. good been met (i.e. good been met (i.e. good been met (i.e. good been met (i.e. good quality sources, min. quality sources, min. quality sources, min. quality sources, min. quality sources, min. References 3 different types, min. 3 different types, min. 3 different types, min. 3 different types, min. 3 different types, min. (5) 2 academic journals, 2 academic journals, 2 academic journals, 2 academic journals, 2 academic journals, consistent referencing consistent referencing consistent referencing consistent referencing consistent referencing format used, cited in format used, cited in format used, cited in format used, cited in format used, cited in text, etc.). text, etc.). text, etc.). text, etc.). text, etc.). 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1 0 The report is free of Most of the report is Some of the report is Very little of the None of the report is spelling and grammar free of spelling and free of spelling and report is free of free of spelling and errors. Sentences are grammar errors. Most grammar errors. spelling and grammar grammar errors. well structured and sentences are well Some sentences are errors. Few sentences None of the sentences Writing flow smoothly. The structured and flow well structured and are well structured are well structured Quality tone of the writing is smoothly. The tone of flow smoothly. Some and flow smoothly. and flow smoothly. (5) professional. the writing is mostly of the writing is The tone of the The tone of the professional. professional. writing is writing is unprofessional. unprofessional. 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1 0 All or most of the Many of the Some of the Few of the formatting None of the formatting formatting formatting specifications have formatting specifications have specifications have specifications have been followed (i.e. specifications have been followed (i.e. been followed (i.e. been followed (i.e. report length, title, been followed (i.e. Formatting report length, title, typed, font style and report length, title, name, typed, spacing, report length, title, (5) name, typed, spacing, size, spacing, page name, typed, spacing, page numbers, rubric name, typed, spacing, page numbers, rubric numbers, rubric page numbers, rubric included, etc.). page numbers, rubric included, etc.). included, etc.). included, etc.). included, etc.). 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 0