The reviewer did not find the paper suitable for the conference and did not find the work original. While the paper was clearly presented, the technical content in theory and application was only moderate. The contribution to research was also moderate. The English writing was good. Overall, the paper was rated as moderate and the reviewer weakly rejected it due to a lack of steps for the algorithms and block diagram.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The reviewer did not find the paper suitable for the conference and did not find the work original. While the paper was clearly presented, the technical content in theory and application was only moderate. The contribution to research was also moderate. The English writing was good. Overall, the paper was rated as moderate and the reviewer weakly rejected it due to a lack of steps for the algorithms and block diagram.
The reviewer did not find the paper suitable for the conference and did not find the work original. While the paper was clearly presented, the technical content in theory and application was only moderate. The contribution to research was also moderate. The English writing was good. Overall, the paper was rated as moderate and the reviewer weakly rejected it due to a lack of steps for the algorithms and block diagram.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The reviewer did not find the paper suitable for the conference and did not find the work original. While the paper was clearly presented, the technical content in theory and application was only moderate. The contribution to research was also moderate. The English writing was good. Overall, the paper was rated as moderate and the reviewer weakly rejected it due to a lack of steps for the algorithms and block diagram.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Is the paper suitable for the Conference? Yes No√ Is there correlation between work done and Yes√ No title? Is the work original? Yes No√ Is the paper clearly presented and well Yes√ No structured? The technical content of the paper in terms of Theory is: Excellent Good Moderate√ Poor The technical content of the paper in terms of Application is: Excellent Good Moderate√ Poor Significant contribution of the paper to the area of the research is: Excellent Good Moderate√ Poor This paper s English writing is: Excellent Good√ Moderate Poor Overall paper rating: Excellent Good Moderate√ Poor Comments to Authors (Please write legible or type and use additional sheet if necessary): There is no steps for algorithms and block diagram.