The document discusses component-oriented programming (COP) as a combination of modular and object-oriented programming where components encapsulate both operations and types. It traces the evolution of programming paradigms from structured programming, where components were procedures, to modular programming, where components were modules, to object-oriented programming, where components were classes. COP benefits software vendors and users by allowing for greater specialization, reuse, and lower costs. The quest to improve programming paradigms and their abstractions of components continues into the future.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses component-oriented programming (COP) as a combination of modular and object-oriented programming where components encapsulate both operations and types. It traces the evolution of programming paradigms from structured programming, where components were procedures, to modular programming, where components were modules, to object-oriented programming, where components were classes. COP benefits software vendors and users by allowing for greater specialization, reuse, and lower costs. The quest to improve programming paradigms and their abstractions of components continues into the future.
The document discusses component-oriented programming (COP) as a combination of modular and object-oriented programming where components encapsulate both operations and types. It traces the evolution of programming paradigms from structured programming, where components were procedures, to modular programming, where components were modules, to object-oriented programming, where components were classes. COP benefits software vendors and users by allowing for greater specialization, reuse, and lower costs. The quest to improve programming paradigms and their abstractions of components continues into the future.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses component-oriented programming (COP) as a combination of modular and object-oriented programming where components encapsulate both operations and types. It traces the evolution of programming paradigms from structured programming, where components were procedures, to modular programming, where components were modules, to object-oriented programming, where components were classes. COP benefits software vendors and users by allowing for greater specialization, reuse, and lower costs. The quest to improve programming paradigms and their abstractions of components continues into the future.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
ORIENTED PROGRAMING BY : SRISHTI PARASHAR CSE Department Evolutions in Programming Paradigm Continued…
Established software development
paradigms have in fact consistently identified components with their primary abstraction mechanism. In structured programming, components are individual operations (i.e. procedures or functions). In modular programming, components are modules that encapsulate a collection of related operations. In object-oriented programming, components are types (i.e. classes), that again encapsulate a collection of related operations. Next Comes The COP!!! What actually is COP?? Components are modules that encapsulate a collection of operations as well as a collection of types . Component-oriented programming can thus be characterized as a combination of modular and object-oriented programming. Evolution of programming language abstractions for components through various software development paradigms. Schematic view of a web browser in terms of components, frameworks, and interfaces. Advantages in Software Industry... Component vendors could concentrate on their areas of expertise without having to actually produce applications to survive. Application vendors could concentrate on the needs of their users without having to become experts in all the areas their application touches upon. Users could expect higher-quality applications at lower prices since the cost savings and productivity gains would “trickle down” to them. A model of the “classic” market for software components in which “centralized reuse” by application vendors dominates. A model of the “modern” market for software components in which “distributed extensibility” dominates The Quest is still ON ..!! Who's next..and What's next..is what we have to think and work upon, “d future engineers”..???