Round Room

Aff.Team Neg.Team

vs.

NCFCA
Judge

Name SPEAKER RANK Name SPEAKER RANK

1A Best……...……Last
1 2 3 4
1N Best……...……Last
1 2 3 4
SPEAKER POINTS Poor…………………Excellent POINT
SPEAKER POINTS Poor…………………Excellent
Persuasiveness 1 2 3 4 5 Persuasiveness 1 2 3 4 5
Organization 1 2 3 4 5 Organization 1 2 3 4 5
Delivery 1 2 3 4 5 Delivery 1 2 3 4 5

A N
Evidence 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence 1 2 3 4 5
Cross-Examination 1 2 3 4 5 Cross-Examination 1 2 3 4 5
Refutation 1 2 3 4 5 Refutation 1 2 3 4 5
TOTAL TOTAL

F Comments: Comments:

E
F
I G
R 2A
Name SPEAKER RANK
Best……………Last
2N
Name SPEAKER RANK
Best……………Last
A
M
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
SPEAKER POINTS Poor…………………Excellent SPEAKER POINTS Poor…………………Excellent
Persuasiveness 1 2 3 4 5 Persuasiveness 1 2 3 4 5

T
Organization 1 2 3 4 5 Organization 1 2 3 4 5

A
Delivery 1 2 3 4 5 Delivery 1 2 3 4 5
Evidence 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence 1 2 3 4 5
Cross-Examination 1 2 3 4 5 Cross-Examination 1 2 3 4 5
Refutation 1 2 3 4 5 Refutation 1 2 3 4 5

T Comments:
TOTAL
Comments:
TOTAL
I
I
V
V
E I voted for the:
E
Affirmative Double Loss Negative

Reason For Decision:

Date______________________________ Judge Signature_______________________________________________________