Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Dimacuha vs.

People of the Philippines

Facts:

This is a petition for review on certiorari filed by petitioner Dimacuha seeking


her acquittal by a reversal of the court decision of conviction for illegal possession
and delivery of prohibited drugs,”shabu”, under sections 15 and 16 of the
Dangerous Drug Act of 1972.

Petitioner was arrested in an entrapment operation conducted by the police


upon a tip from its informant who acted as the poseur-buyer. Petitioner was caught
in flagrante delicto for passing a prohibited drug to another. A subsequent search
on the petitioner’s bag yielded another small plastic sachet of “shabu”.

Issue:

W/N the arrest and search conducted on the person and belongings of the
petitioner without a warrant is valid.

Held:

Yes. The petitioner was caught in flagrante delicto while in the act of
delivering 1.15 grams and in actual possession of another 10.78 grams of
methamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu) as a result of an entrapment operation
conducted by the police on the basis of information received from Benito Marcelo
regarding petitioner's illegal drug trade. Petitioner's arrest, therefore, was lawful
and the subsequent seizure of a bag of shabu inserted inside the cover of her
checkbook was justified and legal in light of the prevailing rule that an officer
making an arrest may take from the person arrested any property found upon his
person in order to find and seize things connected with the crime. The seized
regulated drug is, therefore, admissible in evidence, being the fruit of the crime.

Petitioner next argues that no entrapment (buy-bust) operation ever took


place as no payment was made. This is of no moment. In the crime of distribution of
prohibited drugs, the payment of any consideration is immaterial. The mere act of
distributing the prohibited drug to others is in itself a punishable offense. In Criminal
Case No. 96-112-D-MK, petitioner was charged under Section 15, Article III of RA No.
6425 for the distribution of regulated drugs. The law defines the word "deliver" as a
person’s act of knowingly passing a dangerous drug to another personally or
otherwise, and by any manner with or without consideration.

You might also like