Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Whitepaper Branding Final
Whitepaper Branding Final
Whitepaper Branding Final
In Summary:
Prepared by:
Kiki Kaplanidou, PhD student and
Dr. Christine Vogt, Assistant Professor
Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources
Michigan State University
August 2003
This paper is a result of the collaboration between Travel Michigan and Michigan State University -
Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources
Destination branding is not just about the vis- Comments of tourism industry e x-
The concept of destination branding ual and verbal elements used in a logo or slo- perts on branding
gan
All products require a "branding" effort to suc- In order to better understand how ex-
cessfully compete for customers. Destination Destination Marketing Organizations (DMOs) usually perts in the Michigan Tourism industry
branding is about combining all the attributes face challenges with selecting verbal elements to think about branding, personal inter-
associated with the place (i.e. its products, and include in a brand name and tagline, as well as se- views were conducted with managers
services from various industries such as agricul- lecting visual elements to use in a logo. However, involved in branding projects in their
ture, tourism, sports, arts, investment, technol- branding is not only about these elements. It is industry. Some important points raised
ogy, education, etc.) under one concept, which about the philosophy and the values that form the in the interviews are discussed below.
expresses a unique identity and personality of the brand. The verbal and visual elements of a destina-
destination and differentiates it from its competi- tion brand should represent the values and identity Tamara Real, project director of the
tion. Most importantly, branding requires a vision of a destination and capture the perceptions of its publication “Just who do you think your
and mission about the destination and its future visitors. customers are? A guide to branding
success. For example, the vision of “The Henry your organization” prepared for the
Ford” is that within a decade it will be the great- The Department of Tourism and Marketing in Ver- Michigan Museums Association empha-
est history attraction in America, setting the stan- mont embraces this approach and encourages all sizes that a brand is a promise and that
dards in this field for educational value, hospital- their partners to be consistent with the visitors’ con- branding is about the essence of what a
ity, and meaningful, memorable and satisfying ceptions, which are part of the brand and they are: destination is.
visitor experiences that are related to its mission. beauty, peace, outdoor fun and great amenities. On
their website, vermontpartners.org, they present Linda Jones, Program Manager at the
What is behind a brand and what does it take to that “Vermont brand is not a logo, set of official col- Michigan Grape and Wine Industry
create a brand? It is important to understand ors, or a “look and feel” on advertising a website. Council in the Winery branding guide
what brand means in order to better utilize its The brand exists solely in the minds of the consum- states that by exploring the role that
marketing potential. A brand is an accumulation ers and it encompasses their overall perceptions and “branding” plays in the success of an
of characteristics that form a destination’s image attitudes of Vermont.” (http://www.vermontpartners. organization, individual wineries and
org/htm/research_vtbrand.asp) groups of wineries can develop stronger
and identity. In simple words, branding is a
promise to the consumer, an expectation of messages to gain more support for this
When a brand is established in a consumer’s mind it emerging industry.
performance and a mark of integrity and
can trigger associations with smaller destinations
reputation (Travis, 2000). It builds up continu-
within the area the brand represents. But first there Patricia Mooradian, Chief Operating
ously in the minds of the destination’s consumers
is a need to establish a consistent brand identity. Officer of “The Henry Ford” suggests
and it is affected by experiences, memories
For example, “The Henry Ford” brand is the umbrella that the most important components of
(Deutsch and Real, 2002) and other visitors’ com-
brand name for five different attractions in the same a brand are its identity and essence.
ments. A brand reflects all the destination prod-
destination. Although each attraction has its own Ms. Mooradian also identifies the impor-
ucts and services, which are part of the destina-
positioning, promise, descriptor and tagline, all of tance of having a mission and a vision,
tion’s identity. A brand needs to have unique
them are consistently branded under one brand: which guides an organization’s current
elements, which differentiate it from its competi-
“The Henry Ford”. The choice of this brand name and future branding efforts.
tors and establish an image in the mind of the
was based on research performed by the organiza-
consumer. After establishing an image, branding
tion as to how visitors perceived and referred to the
can further build upon other destination brand
destination.
elements.
In the case of a state, the brand name provides an
umbrella for the state’s other destinations, as well as
Figure 1 below depicts the ‘destination brand
other business entities, which benefit from its
benefit pyramid.’ Answering these questions can
greater exposure. For example, a shopping related
help identify a destination’s brand identity ele-
business located in a primarily outdoor recreation
ments.
destination will benefit from the overall increase in
traffic in the area caused by the overall attractive-
ness of the larger destination. A brand also relies on
Figure 1. Destination brand benefit pyramid Some important points…
(Source: Gyimothy, www.humsamf.auc.dk/edu/snf/
how much the smaller entities in a destination em-
turisme/brandingopl%E6g.ppt) brace and support it in order to reinforce the brand
identity to the visitors and increase its reputation. • Branding creates that first idea
about a destination in the con-
sumer’s mind
What is the essential nature • Branding efforts should be
Level 5 and character of the brand? based on visitors’ perceptions
about the destination
What does value mean for the typical repeat
Level 4
visitor?
• A mission and vision are neces-
sary in destination branding
What psychological rewards or emotional benefits • A destination brand exists in
Level 3 do people get by visiting this destination? the mind of the consumer who,
if satisfied, remains loyal and
Level 2 What benefits to the visitor result from the does not switch.
destination’s features?
2
Components of destination branding
Branding is not just a logo or trademark. It incorporates many components that work together to form the destination brand concept. Their man-
agement is part of the brand strategy. The components are identity, image, personality, essence or soul, character and culture. The value of the
brand is described by the term brand equity. Brand positioning and leveraging are branding management approaches. These components are de-
scribed in Figure 2.
All the components above communicate that a destination brand is about a promise to the potential visitor to de-
liver a positive experience on its distinctive elements. The brand experience can create emotional attachments,
which also reinforce the identity and essence of the destination in visitors’ minds.
F or more information on the terminology and usage of branding components, as well as examples of their application in the tourism industry, please con-
tact Kiki Kaplanidou at kaplanidouk@michigan.org
3
Brand positioning Consequences of branding absence Leveraging destination brand
Brand positioning involves the management The importance of branding may be better per- Line extensions
of the brand and the “manipulation” of the ceived by discussing what happens when brand-
brand components to create an image, a ing is not present. Lack of branding means that A line extension is a new version of the
position in the minds of the visitors that dif- the consumer may not be as aware of a destina- product/service within the same product/
ferentiates the destination from its competi- tion or its identity. This means that during the service class. Examples of product line
tors. Do not try to be all things to all decision making process of choosing a travel extensions would be new flavors, new
people! This is not differentiating the desti- destination the consumer will consider a destina- packaging options, or new sizes. In the
nation brand from the competition. Create a tion, which has a distinct position in his/her case of destination branding, which is
unique position in the minds of the consum- mind. Lack of branding means also lack of visual, more service oriented, a line extension
ers. The positioning of a brand is associated emotional, rational and cultural destination im- would involve creation of a new service or
with the concepts of brand image and brand ages, which do not encourage potential visitors a new experience under the same umbrella
associations. A brand association is anything to feel a certain way about a destination and destination name. For example, “The
“linked” in memory to a brand (Aaker, 1991, potentially motivate them to go there. Branding Henry Ford”, America’s greatest history
p. 109.) For example, when a visitor hears is very important in today's market. With so attraction added the Ford Rouge Factory
Kellogg's or Tony the Tiger he/she associates many products and services to choose from, tour attraction under the current umbrella
the product name with Battle Creek in Michi- consumers need to have some basis in order to name.
gan, the Cereal Capital of the world. make decisions (http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/
internet/inee-ef.nsf/vwGeneratedInterE/ Previous logo Current logo
Positioning a destination brand means to use h_ee00231e.html). Absence of destination
the destination’s strong points and build branding leads to loss of potential visitors.
upon them. It is vital that the brand is believ-
able and reflects some of the underlying fea-
tures of the destination even though they Tips on branding
might not be widely known. It is also impor-
tant to understand the position of the desti- Now that the definitions are understood the
nation in the minds of the consumers so that following sections provide some tips on how
the pertinent positioning strategy is formu- to build, leverage, measure branding and
lated. An example on positioning comes from manage on-line branding.
Morgan, Pritchard and Piggott (2002) and is Line extensions can expand user base,
related to the positioning of New Zealand. Building destination brand loyalty provide variety, energize the brand, man-
The writers discuss that the brand is ‘New age innovation and block or inhibit com-
Zealand’, its brand essence is ‘landscape’ and Marconi (2000, p. 62) in his Brand Marketing petitors (Aaker, 1996, p. 275).
its positioning is ‘New Pacific Freedom.’ This book suggests that consumers decide to remain
tagline for their positioning strategy aims to loyal to the brand based on the following ele- Co-branding
communicate an adventurous new land and ments:
culture on the edge of the Pacific Ocean • value (price and quality), A destination brand can be leveraged
(Morgan, Pritchard and Piggott, 2002). • image (brand’s personality and reputa- through co-branding with another destina-
tion), tion brand that receives more exposure
Brand equity • convenience and availability, and receives greater brand awareness. An
• satisfaction (deliver on the brand example of this is the partnership program
David Aaker (1996, pp. 7,8) defines brand promise) that Travel Michigan is offering to Michi-
equity as” a set of assets (and liabilities) • service and hospitality, gan’s tourism industry. The state of Michi-
linked to a brand’s name and symbol that • unique past and future experiences gan brand benefits partners through wider
adds to (or subtracts from) the value pro- and exposure in target markets, which other-
vided by a product or service to a firm and • guarantee or warrantee. wise couldn’t be reached due to small pro-
that firm’s customers. The major asset cate- motional budgets. Co-branding with the
gories are brand name awareness, brand Leveraging the destination brand State of Michigan provides the opportunity
loyalty, perceived quality and brand associa- to share the benefits of each other’s brand
tions.” Leveraging the destination brand assets is one identity. Research performed by Cai (2002,
recipe for success. Aaker (1996, p. 274) states: p. 720) showed that “cooperative branding
Ritchie and Ritchie (1998) define brand eq- “with its awareness, perceived quality, associa- results in building stronger linkages of the
uity in more technical terms as “the total tions and customer loyalty, a brand is usually the image to the brand identity and more af-
accumulated value or worth of a brand; the most powerful asset that a firm owns”. The fective and attitudes-based brand associa-
tangible and intangible assets that the brand question is how to leverage a brand. There are tions for a region than for individual com-
contributes to its corporate parent, both fi- various ways to do this. According to Aaker munities.” Another example of co-
nancially and in terms of selling leverage.” (1996) leveraging the brand involves: branding comes from the Michigan Grape
• Line extensions strategies and Wine Industry Council. The Council is
• Strategies for stretching the brand using in some of their logos a similar ver-
vertically within existing product/ sion of the State’s tagline adjusted for the
service class Wine Industry: “Great Lakes, Great
• Brand extensions strategies in differ- Tastes”. Also, both the Council and the
ent product classes Official State of Michigan travel web site
• Co-branding strategies feature a link in each other’s web sites.
For destination branding, two strategies of lever-
aging are often used: line extensions and co-
branding.
4
Measuring the effectiveness of Destination Branding on-line How important is branding
the destination brand on-line? Very important!
The use of Internet is increasing and people con-
Branding is also about measuring how successful tinue turning to this communication vehicle for more Branding theory predicts that in cases where
a brand is. In order to do that a destination mar- information regarding tourism destinations. Travel choosing among brands becomes difficult,
keting organization should think what they want Industry Association of America has conducted re- consumers are likely to pick brands they pre-
to achieve with their brand. Factors that can be search on Internet usage among various segments fer or they are familiar with (Kania, 2001).
measured and can be indicators of a brand’s of the population, one of them being travelers. The According to Nielsen//Net ratings, web users
success are: brand name awareness, visitors data support this growth in Internet usage overall visit an average of ten websites per month
perceptions about the brand and its identity ele- and among travelers. Tables 2 and 3 show usage in (Kania, 2001, p. 122). They spend more time
ments, visitors opinions and attitudes, brand 2002 and over the years among all and on-line us- visiting their favorite few sites over new ones
loyalty and traveling behaviors. ers. (Kania, 2001, p. 122). Based on this point, it
Table 3: Travel Planning on the Internet-- is important to create and maintain a desti-
Travel Michigan has been conducting research Millions of U.S. Adults nation web site that is among the traveler’s
on brand awareness. They ask: When you are favorites in order to encourage repeat visita-
thinking about taking a vacation or short pleas- Online tion and increase the opportunities for pur-
ure trip in the UNITED STATES or CANADA what Year Online Frequent chasing a vacation.
cities, states or provinces come to your mind? Travelers Travelers
The following table represents the results on top (millions) (millions) Websites can be the key communication ve-
of mind brand awareness (no recall aids) from hicle that moves a customer’s mind from
Spring 1999 to Spring 2002. The sample of peo- 1997 12.0 6.0 brand awareness to brand preference and
ple was drawn from Michigan’s designated mar- finally to brand loyalty (Kania, 2001).
keting areas (DMAs).
1998 31.2 16.1
But how can brand loyalty be built through
Table 1: Travel Michigan study results on the destination’s website? Destination web
top of mind awareness 1999 48.1 23.5 sites are different from most product web
of Michigan as a travel destination sites since they offer experiences and ser-
vices to the consumer. As such, they have to
% who men- 2000 59.4 30.8
produce a pleasant first visit and form a dis-
tioned Michigan tinct and clear image of what the destination
as a vacation des- 2001 64.5 32.0 stands for. Pleasant experiences will poten-
tination tially make the visitor visit again and eventu-
ally become loyal. As well, visitors can be
Spring 1999 5% 2002 63.9 39.0
pulled back to the web site through e-mail
Spring 2000 7% notifications about new and exciting informa-
tion. Interactivity (e.g. regional maps that
Spring 2001 7% Source: Travel Industry Association of America provide information on town activities by
*A traveler is defined as a person who took at least one trip clicking on the name of the town), quality of
Spring 2002 7% 50+ miles away from home, one-way, in the past year (not
including commuting to from work or school).
content, and pleasant website features could
affect the user to visit again. Creating a
Table 2: Internet usage in the US in 2002 pleasant visit will potentially lead visitors to
Furthermore, there has been an increase in the
talk about the site and the destination brand
Population % of Internet number of people who use the destination’s website
with other people as well.
category users in for travel planning. Among 63.9 million online
2002 travelers, 63% used a destination’s website in
Temporal (2002) states that “the critical suc-
2001 and 2002 compared to 52% in 2000 for
cess factor is the brand experience” (p. 190)
travel planning (source: TIA, 2002 Travelers Use
and offers some general purpose rules to
U.S. Adults 54% Of Internet report).
consider in order to make the website visi-
tors “stick” to it (Temporal, 2002, p.183):
Since people are turning to destination web sites for
Travelers 67%
more information, the branding efforts of a destina-
• Avoid time-consuming downloads
Travelers who use tion should be communicated consistently through
• Ensure quality content
the Internet for its website. Any inconsistencies can confuse the user
• Concentrate on ease of use and
travel plans 45% at this phase. The important aspect with the destina-
navigation
tion website is that it should reflect all the branding
Travelers who use • Use direct relevant language
components and communicate the destination’s
the Internet for • Provide an immediate response
brand identity to the potential visitor.
travel reserva- 27%
tions
5
Source: Travel Industry Association of America
How to measure brand loyalty on the web
6
Resources
Aaker, D. (1996). Building Strong Brands. New Ritchie, J. R. & R.J.B. Ritchie. (1998). The branding Morgan, N., Pritchard. A., & R. Piggott.
York: The Free Press. of tourism destinations: Past achievements and fu- (2002). New Zealand, 100% Pure. The crea-
ture challenges. Paper presented in the Annual Con- tion of a powerful niche destination brand.
Aaker, D. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: gress of the International Association of Scientific Excerpts from the Journal of Brand Manage-
Capitalizing on the value of the brand name. Experts in Tourism (AIEST), 1998, September, Mar- ment. Retrieved July 21st, 2003 from http://
New York: The Free Press. rakech, Morocco. www.intracen.org/execforum/ef2002/papers/
part4_brand_management.pdf .
Aaker, D. & A.L. Biel. (Eds.) (1993). Brand Tapachai, N. & R. Waryszak. (2000). An examination
Equity and advertising: advertising’s role in of the role of beneficial image in tourist destination Toronto’s Tourism Industry Community Coa-
building strong brands. New Jersey: Lawrence selection. Journal of Travel Research, 39(1), 37-44. lition (July 2nd, 2003). Toronto’s tourism in-
Erlbaum Associates, Inc. dustry recovery plan: an industry update.
Temporal, P. (2002). Advanced Brand Management: Retrieved July 14th 2003 from http://www.
Cai, L. (2002). Cooperative branding for rural from vision to valuation. Asia: John Wiley and Sons torontotourism.com/apr2003/
destinations. Annals of Tourism Research. 29 Pte Ltd. July2ndUpdateEvent.ppt
(3), 720-742.
Travis, D. (2000). Emotional branding: how success-
Deutsch, J. & T. Real. (2002). Just who do ful brands gain the irrational edge. Roseville, CA:
your customers think you are? A guide to Prima Venture.
branding your organization. Michigan Museums
Association. Upshaw, L. (1995). Building brand identity: a strat-
egy for success in a hostile marketplace. New York:
Feldwick, P. (2002). What is Brand Equity any- John Wiley.
way? UK: World Advertising Research Center
Electronic resources
Jones, J. P. (Ed). (1999). How to use advertis-
ing to build strong brands. California: Sage About brand WA. What is branding? (n.d.) Retrieved
This is the third paper of the
Publications, Inc. July 16th, 2003 from: http://www.brandwa.com.au/
new Marketing and Research
about/about.asp
paper series created by Travel
Kania, D. (2001). Branding.com: Online brand-
Michigan and the MSU Dept of
ing for marketing success. Chicago: NTC Busi- Baker, B. (n.d.) Destination Branding: Action Series
Park, Recreation and Tourism
ness Books (in conjunction with the American #4: Eleven common pitfalls in destination branding.
Resources to better inform
Marketing Association) Retrieved July 16th, 2003 from http://www.
Michigan’s tourism industry on
destinationbranding.com/PDF/article4a.pdf
marketing research topics. The
Lee, G., Cai, L. & J. O’ Leary. (2001, April).
topics of the first and second
Internet Branding, “A perfect match” or “A Gyimothy, S. (n.d.) Branding in tourism and hospital-
research papers were on con-
fatal attraction”? Analysis of the fifty U.S. ity management. Institute for service management ,
version studies and word-of-
states official tourism websites. Poster presen- Lunds university. Retrieved July 16th, 2003 from
mouth respectively. You can
tation presented at the 13th Annual Northeast- http://www.humsamf.auc.dk/edu/snf/turisme/
view these papers at the fol-
ern Recreation Research Symposium. The Sa- Brandingopl%e6g.ppt
lowing web address:
gamore Resort on Lake George Bolton Land-
http://www.
ing, New York. How to use the Vermont brand. (n.d.). In Vermont-
travelmichigannews.org/
partners.com. Retrieved July 15th, 2003 from http://
Research.htm
Marconi, J. (2000). The brand marketing book: www.vermontpartners.org/htm/research_vtbrand.
creating, managing and extending the value of asp
your brand. Chicago: NTC Business Books (in
conjunction with the American Marketing Asso- Industry Canada (n.d.). What is branding? Retrieved
ciation) July 16th, 2003 from http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/
internet/inee-ef.nsf/vwGeneratedInterE/
Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council. h_ee00231e.html
(2002). Strengthening Winery organizations in
Michigan: A branding Guide. Kotler, M., Thomas, A., & J. Monroe. (1999). Desti-
nation Marketing in the United States: Benchmarks
Park, W.C., Jaworksi B.J., & D.J. MacInnis. and Best Practices. Kotler Marketing Group. Re-
(1986). Strategic brand concept-Image man- trieved July 21st, 2003 from http://www.
agement. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135- kotlermarketing.com/resources/whitepapers/KMG-
145. destination.marketing.best.practices.pdf
Randall, G. (2000). Branding: a practical guide Macrae, C. (n.d.) Brand essence: founding connec-
to planning your strategy, (2nd ed.) London, tions. Retrieved July 21st, 2003 from http://www.
Kogan Page Limited. allaboutbranding.com/index.lasso?article=108