The document discusses why a sukkah taller than 20 amos would be pasul (invalid) according to the Mishnah. There are three reasons given: 1) One would not be aware of the sekhakh (roof covering) at that height; 2) The walls, not the sekhakh, would provide the shade; 3) A sukkah of that height would require sturdy walls that are not temporary in nature as required. The Gemara explores teachings that limit this height restriction and determine which understanding they accord with regarding the disqualification. It also examines the precise point of dispute between two rabbis and challenges their assumptions by citing a story about a debate over a queen's large sukkah.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses why a sukkah taller than 20 amos would be pasul (invalid) according to the Mishnah. There are three reasons given: 1) One would not be aware of the sekhakh (roof covering) at that height; 2) The walls, not the sekhakh, would provide the shade; 3) A sukkah of that height would require sturdy walls that are not temporary in nature as required. The Gemara explores teachings that limit this height restriction and determine which understanding they accord with regarding the disqualification. It also examines the precise point of dispute between two rabbis and challenges their assumptions by citing a story about a debate over a queen's large sukkah.
The document discusses why a sukkah taller than 20 amos would be pasul (invalid) according to the Mishnah. There are three reasons given: 1) One would not be aware of the sekhakh (roof covering) at that height; 2) The walls, not the sekhakh, would provide the shade; 3) A sukkah of that height would require sturdy walls that are not temporary in nature as required. The Gemara explores teachings that limit this height restriction and determine which understanding they accord with regarding the disqualification. It also examines the precise point of dispute between two rabbis and challenges their assumptions by citing a story about a debate over a queen's large sukkah.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses why a sukkah taller than 20 amos would be pasul (invalid) according to the Mishnah. There are three reasons given: 1) One would not be aware of the sekhakh (roof covering) at that height; 2) The walls, not the sekhakh, would provide the shade; 3) A sukkah of that height would require sturdy walls that are not temporary in nature as required. The Gemara explores teachings that limit this height restriction and determine which understanding they accord with regarding the disqualification. It also examines the precise point of dispute between two rabbis and challenges their assumptions by citing a story about a debate over a queen's large sukkah.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
I. Unaware of the Sekhakh: “So that your generations
will know that I made Bnei Yisrael dwell in Sukkos”--- part of the definition of a Sukkah is to know that you are in a Sukkah, and at that elevation one is not cognizant of the Sekhakh (Rabbah) II. Fails to Shade: “And the Sukkah will be for shade by day”-( Yeshaya 4) --- When the Sukkah is 20 Amos or higher, the walls provide the shade rather than the sekhakh (R’ Zeira) III. Permanence- By definition, a Sukkah of that height demands sturdy walls, so this cannot be a Sukkah which needs to be (at least theoretically) temporary/flimsy (Rava) A) The Gemara will explore a number of teachings which limit the application of the height restriction in the mishnah, and will attempt to identify which of the above understandings of the disqualification of 20 Amos they accord with: 1) R’ Yoshiya: The Mishna only prohibits when the walls do not reach the sekhah, but if the walls reached the , the Sukkah would be kasher even at that height 2) R” Huna- The Mishna only prohibits when the walls do not reach the sekhah, but if the walls reached the sekhakh, the Sukkah would be kasher even at that height 3) R’ Chanan bar Rabbah- The Mishna only prohibits in a sukkah that just is able to accommodate a person’s head, most of their body and their table in the sukkah, but if it was larger, it would be kasher B) The Gemara then attempts to identify whether the exact point of the dispute between R’ Huna and R’ Chanan is either 1) The minimum size of a Sukkah 2) Whether a Sukkah that is between the minimum size and 4x4 Amos that is taller than 20 Amos is kasher C) The Gemara then challenges both R’ Huna and R’ Chanan (who assume that our Mishna is disqualifying a more than 20 amos high sukkah with a small volume) by citing the a story about a debate between R; Yehuda and the Chachamim about whether 20 amos+ Sukkah of Queen Helena was kasher or not, assuming that a queen would have a larger Sukkah.