Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al Bal Al Bal Al AL SFG NL
TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al TBD Al Bal Al Bal Al AL SFG NL
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.030
Column AE
0.020
0.010
-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
SLG OPS OPS+ TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB Pos Awards HR/PA 2B/PA 3B/PA
0.15 Column AI
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
BIP Babip Hbip
101 0.306931 31
331 0.283988 94
378 0.314815 119
531 0.308851 164
502 0.296813 149
472 0.271186 128
375 0.266667 100
452 0.307522 139
484 0.309917 150
439 0.259681 114
459 0.302832 139
5396 0.285582 1541
459 0.285582 131
1.060404
Huff's problem is Consistency.
You keep on talking about career average performance. The fact is Huff doesn’t perform to his career
averages reliably.
Here are his career HR/PA:
0.031
0.018
0.047
0.048
0.043
0.035
0.041
0.025
0.048
0.025
0.039
That’s a lot of volatility. For fun, I decided to project out 2011 stats assuming the EXACT same walk rate,
career HBP rate, career 2b-rate, 2010-3b (at&t!) rate.
Here’s his performance:
Using career HR/PA (.035):
.263/.359/.460 (.819 OPS)
Using 2010 HR/PA (.039):
.269/.364/.480 (.844 OPS)
Using 2007/2009 HR/PA (.025):
.253/.350/.418 (.769 OPS)
This tells me his upside is to match his career numbers: .819 OPS +/- .030 (due to BAbip), and his downside
is .750 OPS +/- .030 from age-related decline.
I don’t see him repeating his 2010 .891, with both HR/PA and BAbip 10% above career averages.
his career
me walk rate,
nd his downside
ages.