Film Production Risk Assessment

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

FILM PRODUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT

Company Name: Snap Shot Productions

Production Title: “Numbers” Production Date(s): 17th, 19th, 28th


(December) and 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th (January)
Producer Name: Curtis Jagdev Director Name: Curtis Jagdev

Date of Risk Assessment: 16/12/10 Risk Assessment conducted by: Curtis


Jagdev
Location Hazard Persons Property Risk controls already in place Risk Assessment Further
who may which may LOW, action
be be MODERATE, required to
harmed damaged HIGH, control risk
EXTREME ***
(see table next
page)
1- Piccadilly Crew – Camera – covering the camera not only so When camera
circus Rain and theft electric water that the camera wouldn’t get wet moderate is not in use it
of camera shock damage but also so that it wasn’t 100% will be turned
visible to people who may try off and put
steeling it into a camera
bag
2- pub Rain from Actors Camera – camera was also covered, also in
outside the water terms of actors Manjit was thrown low
pub shots, damage into a car with force, this was
manjit being reacted a few times prior to the
thrown into main filming in slow motion to test
the car and see whether it could be done
without harming the actor by
throwing him in the car. once i had
found a way to do this i shot the
main scene.
3- lift enclosed area Actors To lift lift was tested prior my me to see Moderate
with an actor and crew if it was working fine. Also
in an electric teachers in the school where
environment informed that i was filming there
thus there where people on call to
help if any problems where to
occur.
CONSEQUENCES
LIKELIHOOD Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic

Almost Certain HIGH HIGH EXTREME EXTREME EXTREME

Likely MODERATE HIGH HIGH EXTREME EXTREME

Moderate LOW MODERATE HIGH EXTREME EXTREME

Unlikely LOW LOW MODERATE HIGH EXTREME

Rare LOW LOW MODERATE HIGH HIGH

You might also like