Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1198

B A

UNIVERSITY STUDIO PRESS


- B M

B A
K

PTO TOMO

UNIVERSITY STUDIO PRESS


E E B

EAONIKH 2006
UNIVERSITY STUDIO PRESS
E E B &

: 1997 ISBN 960-12-0610-8


: 2006 ISBN set: 960-12-1497-6
A 960-12-1498-4

H '
, ,
, .

IPO OYNTZHA T. 2310 991547, 2310 693959 - Fax 2310 683136

BAIH MAPMOYNH T. 210 4124378 - Fax 210 4135588

UNIVERSITY STUDIO PRESS A.E.


A 32, 546 35 EAONIKH
T. 2310 208731, 209637, 209837 Fax 2310 216647
e-mail: info@universitystudiopress.gr
H : www.universitystudiopress.gr
TOA TOY BIBIOY 5, 105 64 AHNA T. & Fax 210 3211097







V
8
HN AP APH, IANPIH, APETI KAI IOTEXNIH.

, .

VII

H
. -
, .

. -
.
O
O. -
, -
-
, , O -
.
O -
-
. H
.
-
,
O. -
.

.
.
O .
.
, , -
. .

.
-
.
.
,
.

1997

- IX -

M

. -
, -
. O
.
O ,
, , -
O -
, -
. O , , ,
. -
, ,
, . -
2,5 . ,

, , ,
, .
, -
, . ,
. -
O
. -


, -
. A

. -
. ,
, , , , -
, .
,
,
O .

, , -
,
, , , ,
.
,

- XI -
, ,
-
.
O , , -
, -
O.
, .

, -
.
,
,
O. -
, ,
.
(burn out syndrome).

.
. O
,
,
() , -
/ . O -
,
.
, ,
. , -
,
,
.

. -
,
, .
, -
. .
O -
, -
, -
, -
, M
.

2006

- XII -
..

. . -
, -
,
.
O 1.130 ,
, , , , , ,
, , ,
, , , ,
.
72
6.000(!) .
, -
, -
, . -
: ) ,

, )
)

.
, -
.
,
,
, .

.
,
.

, ,

, .

.

, ,
.

- XIII -
,

,
,
.
, , , -
,
,
-
. O ,
.

. .

- XIV -

.
- -

.
-O

XV

. AEAKH, -O, E B, . KOYBA, -O, B O K-


T -O, - , N E N
N H X. KOOTA, A-O, A-
. O, -O, . - O, Staedtische Kliniken Of-
, O T, ON A fenbach, Strahlenklinik, Offenbach, Germany
M. BAIOMANAKH, -O, A. E. KONTOIANNH, PhD, M B, -
B K, N , I & Y
A IVF & Genetics
E. BREE, E K X, K . KOYMAKH, -O, . -
X O, I ,
K

B. EPOYIA, K -O, . OOYO, -O, A O-


K N YEIA

. AMIO, E K I E. INAPOY, -O, E A,


I I, Y T O, N Metro-
M -O N- politan
I E. MANTAAKH, , A, O,
. AKAOOYOY, K, A. - E K A-O-
, K E, N O N H
. MAYPOYH, E K -
O,
N. HMHTPOOYO, A,
A T EUROMEDICA . MAXAIPA, PhD, -, -
,
. HMHTPOYOOYO, , -

K AONA O
. MOYTZOYPH, E K O -

E. EYTYXIOY, A, A K M-
A, A . MATA, Staedtische Kliniken Offenbach, Strahlen-
klinik, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering,
N. ZAMOOY, A, K A- Offenbach, Germany
O, Staedtische Kliniken Offen-
bach, Strahlenklinik, Offenbach, Germany A. MAMIA, -O, -
A
A. ZMA, A, T K A,
N A . K.N. MAEBANH, B, PhD, K A-
A K, N O
M. ZTOY, A, A. , AONA
O
B. MAPMOYNH, -O, A. -
X.. KAONO, A. K, O- , B K AONA O -
T K -
N
E. MEKPH, B, PhD, K A
E. KAMETA, , E B, O- A K, N O
K N I
N.K. KAPAMANO, B N.. MOYNTOYPOOY, E. I A-
O, AAN M
M.B. KAPAMOYZH, -O, A - S. MURRAY, M B, T M B-
K, AONA O , N etropolitan

XVII
XVIII OY

N. NTOMPO, MD, FR CPC, FACP, K - H.E. ANIA, E K X, K-


, A X O, I -
K
. YNOOYO, , A.
K AONA O B. IAAKA, , M -O -
N I
.B. OIKONOMOY, K , E
O T A. KANAH, A, A K, N-
N YEIA
A.. AH, E , -O- . KAPO, -O, A. E K-
- A, B O-
K N
X. ANOOYO, -O, E I. OYKAKO, -O, T K-
A, B K, AONA O , O K
EANH
E.. ANOTOOYOY, PhD, B, Y T-
I, K . . YPIOOYO, I, Y -
AONA O A, A N

. ANTEIOY, , , - N.E. TAAKH, -O, K I-


,

M. AAMIXAH, MD, PhD, A, N. THPIAOY, B, PhD, K A


A K, N O -
K A A

K, N O
. TZANINH, -O, I K
E. APAKEYA, E K
A
A, K AONA
O E. TIMOEAOY, -O, I-

E. ATHPAKH-KOYPMANH, E K
N T A X. TOH, -O, E A, O-
T N I
N. AYIH, -O, K I-
I K. TAMAKIH, , E A -
K AONA O
. EKTAIH, -O, A. K-
I A K. TATAA, K I

. ENEPOYAKH, -O, E-
B, O K I N. TEH, A, A-
O, Staedtische Kliniken Offenbach, Strah-
E. ETPIOY, MD, MPH, - lenklinik, Offenbach, Germany
& , & -
, HM.-AN. TITH, K X, -
K X O, I
. , - K
O, T , -
. OYNTZHA, -O, K

I , A -
A.E. POYIH, PhD, , K O,
I. PMANO, E K X, K- N
X O, I - . XATZHAKH, B, T K ,
K O K EANH
.. AMEH, -O, A. - X. XPITOOYOY, -O, A. -
, O M, I N- B O K N E-
A N
. AMNH, -O, , M. XPITOYAKH, E A, K X-
K I O, N H-
K

POOO EKOH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
POOO EYTEPH EKOH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
POOO .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XV
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XV

Ba (Prognostic) (Predictive)
.............................................................................. 24
.......................................................................... 26
H XEI ................................................................................ 27
5 ............................................ 28
.................................................................................... 5 .................................................................................. 28
O O O OOO ................ 6 / ...................................................... 28
.............................................................................. 8 ........................................................................ 29
O OO O OOO .................. 9 - ...... 29
.................................................................................. 9 .................................. 30
O .................................................. 9 ................ 30
O .............. 10 ................................................ 31
O .................... 12 ............................................................................ 32
O ................ 13 O O O .................. 33
O OOOO-OO H .............................. 14 ............................................................................ 33
............................................................................ 16 ...................................................................... 33
O OO O O OO o oo-o .... 33
OOOO .............................................................................. 17 .......................... 34
................................................................................ 17 () .................. 35
.......................................................... 17
.......................................................... 17 (Isolation Perfusion) ............................................................ 37
...................................................... 18 / / ............................................ 37
............................................ 18 (Isolated Limb Perfusion ILP) ............................ 38
.................................................... 19 (Radiofrequency ablation RF) .... 41
...................................................... 19 ...................... 41
.................................................. 19 ............................................................................ 43
................................................................................ 19 O OO IO O OOOO H ........ 43
.................................................. 19 .......................... 44
................................ 20 .............................................................. 44
............................................................ 22 ...................................................... 44
.................. 22 .............................................................. 45
O () ...................................................... 45
O .......................................................................... 23 .............................................................. 46

XIX
XX OY

O O .......................... 67
.................................................................................... 46
............................................................................ 47 .................................................................... 70
O OO OOOO - O OO
O O O O; ...... 48 (IMRT) ...................................................................................... 70
............................................................................ 51 ............................................................................ 71
O OOO O
............................................................................ 51
: ,
............................................................................ 53
73
OO O O OOOO
.................................................................................. 53 OI OH ........................................................ 73
............................................................................ 54 .................................. 73
................................................................ 73
.......................................................................... 73
55 .......................................................... 73
- .......................................................................... 73
O
- .......................................................................... 74
O O ................................................ 55
+- ........................................................................ 74
................................................................................ 55
(Electron Capture EC) ................ 74
O O I ...................................................... 56
OO O ........................ 57 .......................................................................... 75
(Internal Conversion IC) .................... 75
............................ 57
) ............................ 57 .................................... 75
) (-60, -137) .... 57 .............................................................................. 76
) ........................................................ 57 Rntgen .............................................................. 76
...................................................................... 58 Rntgen-remsstrahlung ........................................................ 76
........................................ 59 Rntgen ...................................... 76
OO O ............................ 59 .................................................... 77
........................................................ 59 J ...................................................................... 77
................................ 59 ........................................................ 77
............................ 60 KERMA (Kinetic Energy Released in Material) ........................ 77
O Bergonie-Tribondeau .............................................. 61 KERMA ...................................................................... 77
O O .................. 61 D
( ) ...................................................... 77
4R OO .................... 62
D
........................................................ 62
( ) ...................................... 77
OO
E I ........................................................ 77
OO .................................................................. 63
...... 77
...... 64
O O (DOSE FRACTIONATION) ................ 65 ................................................................ 78
Y (yperfractionation) ................................ 65 () .................................................... 78
(ccelerated fractionation) .... 65 ................................................................................ 78
(ypofractionation) .................................... 65 ............................................................................ 79
O .................................................................. 79
O .................................................................. 66 -106 .......................................................................... 79
Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) ...................................................... 66 -90 ............................................................................ 79
Clinical Target Volume (CTV) .................................................... 67 -226 ................................................................................ 79
Planning Target Volume (PTV) .................................................. 67 -60 ............................................................................ 79
Organs at risk (OAR) .................................................................. 67 -137 .............................................................................. 80
Treated Volume (TV) ................................................................ 67 -125 ................................................................................ 80
Irradiated Volume (IV) .............................................................. 67 -103 ........................................................................ 80
OY XXI

-192 ................................................................................ 80 .............................................. 98


........................................................................ 80 ............................ 99
...................................................... 81
........................................................ 82 ........................................................................................ 99
I O O OO .... 82 ........................ 100
................................................................................ 82 .......................... 100
.................................... 83
................................................ 83 .................................................................. 101
................................................ 84
...................................................... 84 .............................................................. 101
.................. 85
.............. 85 ............................................................................ 102
.............. 85
................ 86 ............................................................................ 103
.................... 87 .............................................................. 103
............................................................................ 87 OO .............................................................................. 103
.......................................................................... 104
-
- 107
91
I ................................................................................ 107
................................................................................ 91
O O O .................................... 107
O O
O OO O ...................................... 91 O ............................................................ 107
- .................................................................... 91
O - (cell cycle checkpoints) .......................................................... 109
( cell receptor TCR) ............................................................ 92 G1 S ........................................ 109
- .................................. 92 S ........................................................ 109
OOO G2 S ........................................ 109
O .............................................................................. 93 .............................. 109
OKTONA ............................................ 94
.......... 94 (-Pulse Labeled Mitoses) ................................................ 110
............................................................ 111
.............................................................................. 95 O OO .......................................................... 112
(Growth Fraction GF) .................... 112
.......................................................... 96
(CELL LOSS) .......................................... 112

...................................... 112
.......................................................... 96
Fc A Gompertz .................................. 113
.................................................................... 96
OO (Log Kill) .................... 114
OO O O .................................... 96 .................................................. 116
...................................................... 96 .......................................................................... 116
- Goldie Coldman .................................... 116
.............................................................. 96 O OO O
TIL IL-2 ................................................ 97 (DOSE INTENSITY) .................................................................. 117
TIL TNF- ................ 97 ........................................................................ 119
- .......................................................................... 119
.................................................................. 98
............................................................ 98
XXII OY

Ba .................................................. 127
/ ................................ 128
O O ............................ 128
1.
.............................................................................. 129
OI KINIKE OKIME 123
2. .................................. 139
............................................................ 123 3. T Cockcroft
.......................................... 123 Gault (Clcr).... 139
; ...................................................... 123 4.
Devine ........................................................ 139
O ...................................................................... 123 5.
.................................................... 123 .......................................................................... 140
M I ............................................................ 123 6. DUBOIS
(BSA) (sqM) .... 140
M ............................................................ 123
7. ...................... 140
M .......................................................... 124
.......................................................................... 144
........................................................................ 124
O (Good Clinical Practice GCP) ........ 124
................................................ 124 CH GCP
.......................................................................... 124 145
(CRF) ...................................... 124 H ................................................................................ 145
........................................................ 125 1. OO .......................................................................... 145
(monitor) ............................................................ 125 1.1. (Adverse Drug Reaction ADR) .................. 145
OI OOI .................................................................... 125 1.2. (Adverse Event) ............................ 145
1.3. ( ) .................................... 145
(induction chemotherapy Neoadjuvant) ........................ 125 1.4. .................. 145
(Adjuvant) .................. 125 1.5. [
1 ...................................................... 126 ()] ...................................................... 145
2 ...................................................... 126 1.6. .......................................................................... 146
1.7. .......................................................... 146
(Dose-Limiting Toxicity DLT) ........................................ 126 1.8. .......................................................... 146
1.9. ...................... 146
(Maximum Tolerated Dose MTD) .................................. 126 1.10. ...................................................... 146
(Disease free survival) .......... 126 1.11. (CRF) ...................... 146
(Overall Survival) .............................................. 126 1.12. / ................................................ 146
(Response Duration) .................. 126 1.13. / ...................... 146
1.14. ...................................................... 146
(Time to progression TTP) ............................................ 126 1.15. ( ) ...................... 146
............................................................ 126 1.16. .......................................................... 146
.................................... 126 1.17. .................................................................... 146
................................ 126 1.18. .................................................. 146
.......................................................... 126 1.19. ................................................ 146
........................ 126 1.20. (CRO) .......... 146
.................................................. 126 1.21. .......................................................... 147
.......................................... 126 1.22. .............................................. 147
( 1.23. .................................................... 147
) .......................................................................... 127 1.24. O (GCP) ........................................ 147
( ) .. 127 1.25.
/ (IDMC) (
............................................................................ 127 , ,
.... 127 ) ................................ 147
OY XXIII

1.26. .............................................. 147 4.2. ................................................................ 153


1.27. 4.3. ........ 153
(AE-IEC, Independant Ethical Commitee) .................... 147 4.4. / .............................................. 153
1.28. .................................... 147 4.5. .................................. 154
1.29. .................................................................. 147 4.6. .................................................... 154
1.30. () .......................................................... 148 4.7.
1.31. (-IRB) ................ 148 .................................................................... 155
1.32. / .... 148 4.8.
1.33. .................................................. 148 ............................................................................ 155
1.34. .................................................................... 148 4.9. ............................................ 157
1.35. / ...................................................... 148 4.10. ...................................................... 158
1.36. 4.11. .......................................... 158
(Investigators Brochure) ................................................ 148 4.12. .......... 158
1.37. .................................. 148 4.13. (-) (-) .............. 159
1.38. .......................................................... 148 5. OTHPIKTH .................................................................. 159
1.39. ................................ 148 5.1. .................. 159
1.40. .................................................... 148 5.2. O (CRO) ........................ 159
1.41. ........................................................ 148 5.3. ............................................ 159
1.42. ( 5.4. .................................................. 159
) ................................................................ 148 5.5. ,
1.43. .................................... 148 .................................................. 159
1.44. ................................................................ 148 5.6. ................................................ 160
1.45. .................................. 149 5.7. ........ 161
1.46. (QA) .............................................. 149 5.8. ...... 161
1.47. (QC) .............................................. 149 5.9. O ...................................................... 161
1.48. ................................................................ 149 5.10. / .................. 161
1.49. ............................................................ 149 5.11. / ................ 161
1.50. (SAE) 5.12. ................ 162
(ADR) ........................................................ 149 5.13. , ,
1.51. .................................................... 149 ...................................... 162
1.52. .................................................... 149 5.14.
1.53. ................................................................ 149 .................................................................... 162
1.54. .......................................... 149 5.15. .................................................. 163
1.55. (SOP) ...................................... 149 5.16. .............................................. 163
1.56. ........................................................ 149 5.17. ................ 163
1.57. ................................................ 150 5.18. ...................................... 163
1.58. .................... 150 5.19. ........................................................................ 165
1.59. ...................................................... 150 5.20. .......................................................... 166
1.60. .......................................... 150 5.21. ........ 166
1.61. .................................................. 150 5.22. / .................... 166
1.62. ( ) ........................ 150 5.23. ................................................ 166
2. OI APXE TH OHIA ICH GCP ........................................ 150 6. PTOKOO TH KINIKH OKIMH KAI
3. OYO EO O YO / A TPOOOIHEI TOY PTOKOOY ................................ 166
OH OOOI ( / ) ................................ 151 6.1. ...................................................... 166
3.1. ...................................................................... 151 6.2. .................................................... 167
3.2. , ................................ 152 6.3. ........................................ 167
3.3. ...................................................................... 152 6.4. .................................................. 167
3.4. ............................................................................ 152 6.5. ...................... 167
4. EPEYNHTH ........................................................................ 153 6.6. ........................................ 167
4.1. ........................ 153 6.7. .................................. 168
XXIV OY

6.8. .................................................... 168


6.9. ........................................................................ 168 rastuzumab ........................................................................ 200
6.10. / (antisense)
........................................................................ 168 Angiozyme ............................ 202
6.11. ................ 168 P450 ,
, .................................................. 203
6.12. .................................................................. 168
.......................................................................... 204
6.13. ...... 168
6.14. O .............................. 168
6.15. .................................................................. 168
6.16. ............................................................ 168
7. ENHMEPTIKO YAIO IA TON EPEYNHTH .................. 168
E
7.1. ........................................................................ 168
7.2. .................................................................. 169 209
7.3. H ................................................................................ 209
.................................................................. 169 EOOA OOY .......................................... 209
7.4. 1 .................................................................. 172 E I DNA OI
7.5. 2 .................................................................. 172 (DNA SEQUENCING) .............................................................. 211
8. AAPAITHTA EPAA IA TH IEAH MIA KINIKH ( Sanger) .................................. 211
OKIMH ............................................................................ 172
8.1. ........................................................................ 172 (Southern Northern Blotting) ........................................ 213
8.2. .... 173 OOI O DNA OH DNA ...................... 214
8.3. OOI O DNA H DNA
.......................................................................... 176 OH (cDNA LIBRARY) ................................................ 216
8.4. .. 179 H OH AO ...................................... 217
H I OA
(PCR POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION) ................................ 217
-
PCR ...................................... 218
181
MOOI DNA (DNA MICROARRAYS DNA CHIPS) .. 219
OHIA 2001/20/EK TOY EYPAKOY KOINOBOYIOY ........ 181 O OI O OY OO
.......................................................................... 193 (CANCER GENOME ANATOMY PROJECT) ................................ 221
Western Blotting .................................................. 221
FIS (fluorescent in situ hybridization) ................................ 222
195 (SKY) .................................. 223
(CGH) .................... 223
................................................................................ 195 .......................................................................... 223
OH H E .............................. 195
OH H E .......................... 196
.................................................. 197 (PROTEOMICS) -
........................................ 197 (GENOMICS) 227
...................................... 197
................................................................................ 227
.......................................................... 198
- (OMICS) .................................. 228
(antisense) ................................ 198
ONIMATIKH (GENOMICS) ................................................ 229
.................................................................... 198 (Conventional karyotyping) .. 229
OEOI APAONTE O OYO OH in situ (Fluorescence in situ
I .............................................................................. 199 hybridization FISH) .............................................................. 229
STI571:
.............................................................. 199 (Spectral karyotyping SKY) .................................................. 230
OY XXV

-FISH ........................................................ 231


Centromeric multiplex-FISH (CM-FISH) ............................ 231 V O
Rx-FISH ............................................................................ 231
IIKH KAPKINOENEH 249
Fast-FISH .......................................................................... 231
-FICTION (Multicolor-FICTION) .............. 231 I ................................................................................ 249
.................................. 231 OI PAH RNA DNA OKOONN IN .............. 249
IPM-FISH .......................................................................... 231 RNA ................................................................ 249
-FISH (Micro-FISH) .................................................. 231 DNA ................................................................ 251
PRINS ................................................................................ 232 H KAPKINOENEH OYTAIAKO AINOMENO ............ 253

(Comparative Genomic Hybridization CGH) .......................... 232 in vitro ............................................................................ 253
(Nucleic Acid
Based Microarrays) in vivo ............................................................................ 253
(Gene Expression Arrays) ........................................................ 232
...................................................... 253
................................................................ 233 OI IOI AITIA HMIOYPIA KAPKINOY TON ANPO .... 254
MHXANIMOI PAH OKOONN IN TON ANPO ...... 255
O ................................................ 255
...................................................... 233
O .............................................. 256

Epstein-Barr virus ................................................................ 256
.................................... 233
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) .......................................................... 256
...................................................................... 233
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) .......................................................... 257
(PROTEOMICS) ................................................ 234
Human Papilloma virus (HPV) .............................................. 257
(expression proteomics) ............ 235
(functional proteomics) .......... 235 Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) .............................................. 257
.................................................................... 257
.......................................................... 235
.......................................................................... 258

(two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
2D-PAGE) ,
(Mass Spectrometry MS) ...................................................... 235 261

H ................................................................................ 261
(Yeast two-hybrid system) ...................................................... 235
OH OE ............................................ 261

OA OI ............................................................ 264
(Protein-based Microarrays) .................................................. 236
OH OH O I
E
O OO O IO .............. 265
(Fluorescence resonance energy transfer FRET) ................ 237
IO: I O OHO ............................ 266

IO OH OO
(Laser Capture Microdissection LCMD) ................................ 237
O A ........................................................................ 267
(Tissue Microarrays) .......................... 237
KIO O OOAO .................................................... 267
RNA (RNA interference RNAi) .......................... 238
IO TOY OAO .................................................... 268
O OOO O
IO TOY EO EO .......................................... 269
OO .......................................................................... 238
KIO O HO OO ...................... 270
(wet genomics) .............................. 238
IO O EO .................................................. 270
.......................... 239
KIO O YO .................................................... 271
(Pharmacogenomics) .................... 239
IO O A ........................................................ 272
(Gene therapy) .................................... 239
IO O O .................................................... 272

KIO O EO .................................................... 272
- ...................................................................... 240
KIO O OY .......................................................... 273
A .................................................................... 241
KIO O OY O A ................................ 274
.......................................................................... 242
IO O HO H ................................ 274
XXVI OY

IO O OIO .............................................. 275 OOH Y O IO .......................... 305


KIO O .................................................... 275 OH A O IO ...................................... 306
IO O OA ...................................................... 276 DNA OOI (MICROARRAYS) IO ........ 306
IO O ...................................................... 276 I .............................................................................. 307
IO OOOO Y ...................................... 277 .......................................................................... 307
IO O OY ........................................................ 278
IO O AO .................................................... 278 311
IO O OOY ................................................ 279
................................................................................ 311
HODGKINS HODGKINS ........................ 279
O O OO .......................................... 311
I ............................................................................ 280
OOO O .................................................... 312
OH OH H
O IO .................................... 281 O O (GENETIC TESTING) .............................. 313
.......................................................................... 281 OOO O O O ................ 314
OOO O O O ...................... 318
O ........................................................ 322
V K OO O ................................ 323
Peutz-Jeghers ...................................................... 323
293 Gardner ................................................................ 323
H ................................................................................ 293 Li-Fraumeni .......................................................... 323
O-OOOI ............................................................ 294
(ultiple endocrine neoplasia 1) ................................ 324
- ................................ 294
2
- ............................ 294
(ultiple endocrine neoplasia MEN 2) ................................ 324
OOOI ........................................................................ 295
2 ............................................................ 324
.............................................................. 295
2 ............................................................ 324
............................................................ 295
O ............ 324
........................................ 295
.......................................................................... 325
.......................................... 295
.......................................... 296


............................................................ 296
........................................................ 296 V
................ 296
OOOO OI ...................................................................... 296 EEXO TOY KAPKINOY YNATOTHTE
DNA ................................................................ 296 POHTIKH APEMBAH 333
RNA ................................................................ 297 O .............................................................................. 333
O ................................................ 300 E A ................................................................ 335
OO-A OI ................................................ 300 .................................................................................... 336
Knudson ...................................................... 301 .............................................................. 336
(LOH) .............................................. 302 O EO ...................................................... 336
AI H IO ............................................ 339
- I .......................... 302 .......................................................................... 339
Wilms .................................................................... 302
O ............................................ 302
341
.................................................................. 302
Li-Fraumeni .......................................................... 303 E ................................................................................ 341
OA OI ........................................................ 303 O .......................................................................... 341
O ............................................................................ 303 OO ON O -O .. 342
O p53 .................................................................. 303 .... 342
p53 .................................................................. 304 - ........ 343
OE I OH OO ........ 304 OO ON O TOY O .......... 343
OY XXVII

.... 343 OI H O O
.................. 343 O OOOO Y .................................................. 366
XOO TON O TOY O ................ 344 IOO .............................................................................. 366
.............................................................................. 344 .......................................................................... 367
.......................................................................... 345
.......................................................................... 346
(-4-hydroxyphenyl-retinamide 4-HPR) ...... 347 371
........................ 347 O OI .......................................... 371
() .............................................. 347 OOH OH O
OO TON O TOY O O OE OE E AO
O ................................................................................ 348 I ...................................................................... 373
........................................................ 348 OOH OH OOI ........................ 374
............................................................................ 348 OH I OOO ...... 375
O ...................................................................... 348 i. .......................................................................... 375
O ........................................................ 349 ii. .......................................................................... 375
a-difluro-methyl-ornithine (DFMO) ........................................ 349 iii. ................................................................ 377
O (NSAIDs) iv. .................................................................... 377
........ 349 v. ............................................................ 377
- 2 (COX-2) .......................... 350 vi. .................................. 377
OO TON O TOY O ............ 350 OH I O ................ 378
.............................. 350 ........................................ 379
H .............. 351 .......................................... 379
DHT .............................. 351 .................... 380
.............................................................. 351
............................ 380
GSTP-1 .................................. 352
I O .................................. 380
A OOE ........................................ 352
E A O OH
.......................................................................... 352 OH ........................................................................ 381
O BIRADS OA OOY
357 EO ................................................................................ 382
H ................................................................................ 357 OOO EO O
E E OOOI O .................................. 357 OI ........................................................................ 383
(Specific tumour antigens) ...... 358 O
...................................................................... 383
E OY OOY ...................... 359
A O (CELLULAR VACCINES) ........................ 359
.................................................................. 384
.............................................. 359
( ) ................ 384
.............................................. 360
OI O OO EO (SCREENING) .... 385
...................... 360
H O O OOI

OI .............................................................. 390
................................................................................ 361
.......................................................................... 390
A O (NON-CELLULAR VACCINES) .......... 362
.................................................... 362
(Purified Immunogens) .... 363
...................................... 363 (...) 393
........................................................................ 364 OOH I IO O
(gangliosides) .................................................... 365 (FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TEST F.O.B.T.) E E
.................................. 365 OH OOI EO OA .................. 393
OOO EO (Y OOOOO-
/ OONOO) ................................................ 395
(genetic vaccination / recombinant vaccines) ........................ 365 ...................................... 396
XXVIII OY

.................................................................... 397
........................................................ 410
........................................................ 398 O O O O O
H E O OOY .......................................... 398 O ................................................................................ 411
KOOOYO IO EO EO - .................................................................... 411
O EO .............................................................. 399
............................................ 399 ; .......... 412
O (FAP) .................... 399 OO N POPAMMATN
........................................................................ 399 O O O ...................................... 412
.............................................. 399 O O O
- O ................................................................................ 412
(Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer .............................. 412
HNPCC) .................................................................................. 400
........................................................................ 400 (screening) ............................................................................ 413
.............................................. 400
Amsterdam ...................................................... 402 ; ................................................................................ 413
Bethesda- ............................ 402 .................... 413
.......................................................................... 402 .................................................................... 414
.......................................................................... 414


PSA 405 419
O O EO O O OO
A .............................................................................. 405 O ................................................................................ 420
O O H
; ................................................................................ 405
O O TOY OO O O O O O
O O ...................................................................... 406 O O O O ........ 421
OO O O O test ; ........ 421
O ................................................................................ 406 test
...................................... 406 ; ...................................................................... 422
(TRUS) ...................................... 407
(PSA) ........................................ 407 .................................................................... 422
, PSA .......... 407 .................................................... 422
PSA; ................................ 408 OO ................................................................ 422
................................................ 422
PSA ........................................................ 408 OOO O
OO OO
PSA (1c) ........ 408 (Y BETHESDA 2001) .................................................. 422
PSA (PSA Density) .......................................... 408 ...................................................... 422
PSA (PSA Velocity) .................. 409 .............................................................. 422
( ) .......... 409 ........................................................ 422
PSA (f/t PSA) ................................ 409 ........................................................ 423
............................................................ 423
; ...................................... 410 .......................................................................... 423
OY XXIX

V A (Methyl CCNU MeCCNU) .......................... 452


(Streptozocin) ........................................ 452
............................................................................ 452
H IAIKAIA ANATYH NEN
-D (D-actinomycin) ...................................... 453
ANTINEOAMATIKN APMAKN 431
(Mitomycin C) ................................................ 453
................................................................................ 431 .................................................................. 453
............................................................................ 431 (Daunorubicin) .................................... 454
................................................................................ 431 (Doxorubicin) .......................................... 454
.................................................................... 433 (Epirubicin) .................................................. 455
........................................ 433 I (Idarubicin) .................................................. 455
.................................... 433 (Mitoxantrone) .......................................... 455
Compare ............................................................ 434
.................................................. 435 (Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) .................................... 456
.......................................................... 435 O O .............................................. 456
.................................................................. 435 G1 ............................................................................ 456
I .................................................................... 435 .................................................................................. 456
.................................................................. 436 L- (L-Asparaginase) .................................. 456
.................................................................. 436 S .............................................................................. 457
OO O OO IAOH O NCI ........ 436 .................................................................... 457
C-DNA MICROARRAYS (O) .............................. 437 ...................................................... 457
5- (5-FU, Fluorouracil) .......................... 457
O O O ALL ...................... 440 (Tegafur) ...................................................... 459
O O .......................................................... 459
OO O - (Cytarabine) ................................ 459
.............................................................................. 440
(Capecitabine) ............................................ 459
.................................................................... 442
(Gemcitabine) ................................................ 459
.......................................................................... 442
.......................................................... 460
(Thioguanine) ............................................ 460
6- (6-Mercaptopurine) ........................ 460
445 (Azathioprine) ............................................ 460
KO YO .............................................................. 445 .............................................................. 461
A O OY YO .......................................... 445 (Hydroxyurea) ............................................ 461
H A O OY ........................ 445 ...................................... 461
A O OY YO A .................... 447 - (Methotrexate) .................... 461
.................................................. 447 G2 ............................................................................ 462
(Nitrogen Mustard) ........ 447 .............................................................................. 462
(Cyclophosphamide) .......................... 448 (Bleomycin) .................................................. 462
(Ifosphamide) .............................................. 449 (Mithramycin) .............................................. 462
(Melphalan) (L-Phenylalanine Mustard, ............................................................ 463
L-PAM) .............................................................................. 449 ................................................................ 463
(Chlorambucil) ...................................... 450 (Etoposide VP 16) ........................................ 463
(Busulphan) .............................................. 450 (Teniposide VM 26) .................................... 464
(Thiotepa) .......................................................... 451 .............................................................................. 464
...................................................................... 451 Vinca Rosea .................................................. 464
(Carmustine BCNU) ................................ 451 (Vinblastine) ................................................ 464
(Lomustine CCNU) .................................... 452 (Vincristine) .................................................... 465
XXX OY

(Vindesine) ........................................................ 465 ...................................................................... 487


(Vinorelbine) .............................................. 466 , , ............................ 487
.................................................................................. 466 - .......................................................... 487
(Paclitaxel) .................................................... 466 ........................................................................ 488
(Docetaxel) .................................................... 467 ...................................................................... 488
........................................................ 467 ........................................ 488
(Cisplatin) ........................................................ 467 ............................................................................ 488
(Carboplatin) .......................................... 468 .................................................... 489
O (Oxaliplatin) ................................................ 469 ...................................................................... 489
................................ 469 .......................................................... 490
(Dacarbazine DTIC) .............................. 469 .......................................................................... 490
(Temodal) .................................................. 469 OO OO .............................................. 491
(Procarbazine) ........................................ 469 .............................................................................. 491
................ 471 .................................................... 492
OH OO OI ........................ 471 ...................................................... 493
.................................................................. 471 .............................................. 493
.................................................................. 471 .............................................. 494
.................................................................. 472 M ............................................ 495
........................................................ 473 .................................................. 495
.......................................................... 473 - .................................................... 496
.................................................... 474 .................................................................. 497
.......................................................................... 475 O ............................................ 497
................................................................ 497
477 .......................................................................... 498
OO ........................................................ 499
OOO O Raynaud .............................................................. 499
O ........................................................................ 477
................................ 500
.......................................................... 477
.......................................... 501
.................................................... 477
.............................. 501
.............................................................................. 477
E .............. 502
...................................................................... 479
.................................................................. 502
O ............................................................ 479
.......................................................................... 502
.................................................................. 479
OOO O OO
.......................................................................... 480
O .......................................................................... 503
.................................................................... 480
.................................... 504
........................................................................ 480
.............. 504
.......................................................................... 481
........................................................................ 505
........................................................................ 481 ...................................... 505
............................................................................ 481 ................................................................................ 505
........................................ 481 .................................................................. 506
O .................................... 482 ........................................................ 506
.......................................... 482 E ................................................ 506
.................................. 507
.................................................... 483 .......... 507
.......................................................................... 483 -
............................................ 485 .................................................. 508
L- .................................................................... 485 K .................................. 508
.................................................................................. 486
........................................................ 487 ( ) ........................................................ 509
OY XXXI

........................................................................ 509 .................................. 528


............................................................................ 509 .................................................................. 529
.................................................................. 509 .................................................................... 529
.......................................................................... 510 .............................................. 530
...................................... 510 ............................................................ 530
5- ................................................................ 510 v v .................................................... 531
............................................................................ 510 .......................................................................... 531
.............................................................................. 510 .......................................................... 531
.......................................................................... 511 ...................................................................... 531
rastuzumab (Herceptin) ........................................................ 511 ........................................................................ 531
.......................................................................... 511 ........................................................ 531
OH OO .................................................... 514 .................................................................. 531
.............. 515 ........................................................ 531
............................................ 515 -
.................................................................. 516 (CINV) .................................................................... 532
............................................................................ 516 O ...................................................................... 533
C .......................................................................... 517 (delayed emesis) ........................................ 533
........................................................................ 517 (anticipated emesis) .......................... 533
.......................................................................... 517 ............................................................ 533
........................................................................ 518 .................................................................... 534
.................................................................... 518 .................................................................. 534
.................................................................. 518
.................................................... 534
........................................................................ 518
.................................................................. 535
- .......................................................... 519
............................................ 535
.......................................................................... 519
........................................................ 535
........................................................................ 519
O .............................................................. 535
.......................................................................... 519
( ) .................................... 535
OOH OO .................................................. 521
O .......................................................................... 536
.................................................... 522
.................................... 536
.......................................................................... 522

OO O O
.................................. 536
O OO .................................................................... 522
.............................. 537
.............................................................................. 522
........................................................................ 522
(GVHD) ................................................................ 537
.................................................................. 523
GVHD .................................... 537
.................................................................... 523
.......................................................................... 538
.......................................................................... 523
OOO ................................................................ 542
........................................................................ 523
........................................................................ 523 ...................................................... 544
5- ................................................................ 523 ............................................................................ 546
- .......................................................... 524 ............................................ 546
............................................................ 524 ...................................................... 546
............................................................................ 524 O ........................................ 547
.................................................................. 524 O ........................................................ 547
.......................................................................... 524
OO O O O Y .................... 525 ................................................................................ 548
............................................................................ 525 .......................................................................... 548
........................................................ 526 OO OI OA .......... 550
.................................................. 527 ................................................ 550
XXXII OY


................................................................................ 551 ................................................................................ 580
........ 552 .... 581
........................ 553 ................................ 584
v .................................................................. 553 O (O) .......................... 584
.................................................................... 553 dgkins () ............................ 585
.................................. 554 .......................................... 586
.......... 554 .......................................................... 587
.... 554 .................................... 588
.......................................................................... 555
............................................................................ 590
.............................. 591
557

................................................................................ 557 ............................................ 592
O O ........................................ 558 OO O O .... 592
............ 558 O O-
.............................. 559 O O ............................................ 594
........................ 559
...................................... 559 ........................................................ 594
...................... 560
OO O () ...... 560 (AA) ...................... 594

-gp .......................................................... 561
............................................................ 594

P-gp .................................................................... 562 I ........................................................ 595
.......................................................................... 596

MRP .................................................................... 563
........................................................................ 564
V H



LRP (Lung-Resistance Protein) .......................... 564
O O ................ 564
.................. 564
...................................... 565 603
........ 566 OOI O OO .................................... 603
.................................................... 566 O ............ 605
O O OO ...... 567 OE OOOI .............................................. 606
p53 ........................................................................................ 568
........................................................................ 568 .......................................... 609
.......................................................................... 568 MOPE OOO TON KAPKINO
TOY MATOY .......................................................................... 610
O ................................................ 610
-
O
575
(Selective estrogen receptor modulators SERMs) ............ 610
O .................................................................. 575 ........................................................................ 611
I I OOO I O- ................................ 612
OTHTA .............................................................................. 575 .......... 613
O .................................................... 577
O O I O ...... 579 .................................................................................. 614

.................................................................... 580 .............................. 615
OY XXXIII

.................. 616
645
................................................................................ 618
................................................................................ 645
.................................. 618
...................... 645
.................................................. 619
.................................................................... 646
LH-RH ...................................... 620
........................................ 646
SERMs
.......................................................................... 620 E OI O INO
O OA ...................................................................... 646
- .......................... 620
O ............................................................................ 647
...................................................................... 620
.................................................................... 620 O ............................................................................ 647
.......................................................................... 621 LH-RH .................................................................... 647
SERMs .................................................. 621 ONOEPAEIA ME ANTIANPOONA TH EPAEIA
TOY KAPKINOY TOY POTATH .............................................. 648
........................................................................ 622
O .............................................................. 649
................ 623
.......................................................................... 649
................ 625
.......................................................................... 649
.................... 625
...................................................................... 650

................................................................ 625 150 mg .......................................................... 650
.................................................. 627 EO OOO OO .................. 650
...... 627 O OOO OO ...................... 651
...................................... 627 OO OOO ................................ 651
............ 628 O OOO ............ 652
OOO ............................ 652
.......................................... 628 OPOO .................. 653
O .......................................................................... 653
................................................................................ 630
O

X
...................................................... 630

............................................ 631
.......................................................... 631

.................................................................... 631 BIOOIA METAMOXEYH AIMOOIHTIKN
.................................................................... 632
KYTTAPN 659
............................................................ 633
................................................................................ 659

.............................................................. 633 OH OH ............................................................ 659
LH-RH .................................................................... 633 I O OO A .... 660
.................................................................. 635 .................................................... 660
.......................................................................... 635 ...... 660
................................ 660
(olerance) .......................................... 660

OH O YO O OO
641 A XOO OH OO
................................................................................ 641 OE .................................................................... 661
OH OONOEPAEIA ...................................... 641 .............................................................. 661
OOOI H OO .................... 641 ........................................ 662
O OOOI ...................................................................... 663
OI ................................................................ 642 () .................................... 663
.......................................................................... 642 O (OM) .................................. 663
XXXIV OY

O (O) .................................. 664


.............................................. 665 703
.......................................................... 665
I OY YO .............................................. 704
Hodgkins Hodgkin .......... 666
OI H O H I
.................................................................... 667 A YOOAO OO O ...... 705
O OO OO A ................ 667 .......................................................................... 706
E OO OO A ................ 669
A OOY O OO
A IO OE ...................................... 670 - -
(Conditioning) .............................. 670 709
E .......................... 670 OH O OO
A () ................................................................ 709
...................................................................... 671 O A OO (GVT) .......................................... 710
.................... 672 H O O-OOY O ...... 710
...................................................... 672 OOA H OOI ................ 710
.................................. 673 E E ................................................................ 711
.................................................................. 674 ............................................................................ 711
OO TOY MOXEYMATO KATA TOY ENITH (GVHD) ........ 674 ............................................................................ 711
OE O A O A Y .................................... 711
OA OOI E .... 712
100 A O .............................................. 677 .......................................................................... 713
OOOH A A O
OO A .................................................. 677
OO O O
O OO A .................. 680
E
O OE A O
BAIKE APXE EPITONAKH
OO A .................................................. 681
XHMEIOEPAEIA 719
I OOH A O
OO A .................................................. 681 ................................................................................ 719
O OE ............................................................ 682 OO O .............................. 719
OE OOE .................................................. 684 OO OO O
.......................................................................... 685 OO O .......................................... 720
O OOO OO
O .................................................................................... 720
............................................................................ 721
691 5- (5-FU) .................................................... 721
H ................................................................................ 691 O O O O
OOI O OI IO OO ............................................................................ 722
OY .................................................................................. 691 O O OO .................... 722
................................................................ 692 .......................................... 722
.......................................................................... 725
(Late Intensification) ............................................................ 692

B

(High-Dose Sequential) ........................................................ 692

(Multi-cycle high-dose chemotherapy) ................................ 692

OO ............................................................ 693
-
O
O O ................................................ 696 729
IOO .............................................................................. 698 ................................................................................ 729
.......................................................................... 699 MONOKNIKA ANTIMATA .............................. 731
OY XXXV

YZEYMENA MONOKNIKA ANTIMATA .......................... 734 - ...................................................................... 764


A ........................................ 734 - ...................................................................... 764
.................................................................. 734 AO O- (TNF-) ................ 764
........................................................................ 735 I-2 .................................................................... 764
POOTIKE ............................................ 737 -2 (rIL-2) .... 764
.......................................................................... 738 ............................................ 765
........................................ 767
-2 .................................... 767
743 -2 ................................................ 767
................................................................................ 743 .......................................................................... 768
OO OO ............ 744
Trastuzumab (erceptin) ...................................................... 744
Cetuximab (IMC-C225) .......................................................... 745
N O
Edrecolomab (17-1A) ............................................................ 746 773
3F8 ........................................................................................ 746
.......................................................................... 774
CC49 ...................................................................................... 746
Anti-VEGF .............................................................................. 746
775
nti-Tenascin ........................................................................ 746
Theragyn (90 Y-Pemptumomab) .......................................... 747 H ................................................................................ 775
OO OO OI DHFR (DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE
O .......................................................................... 747 INHIBITORS) .......................................................................... 776
AO OOI .................................................... 777
Rituximab .............................................................................. 747
5- (5-FU)
Alemtuzumab (Campath-1) ................................................ 748
........................................................ 777
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (ylotarg) .................................. 748
- 5- (Prodrugs) ............ 778
BL22 ...................................................................................... 749
(Capecitabine, Xeloda) .................................. 778
CD45 ...................................................................................... 749
UFT ........................................................................................ 780
........................................................................ 749
S-1 .......................................................................................... 780
.......................................................................... 749
AO OOOI .......................................... 781
OI YIH ETA .............................. 781

B ANTIOIKA OAN TOXN


(MTA, PEMETREXED DISODIUM, ALIMTA) .............................. 782
OI GARFT (GLYCINAMIDE RIBONUCLEOTIDE
OI BIOOIKOI TPOOOIHTE FORMYLTRANSFERASE) AICARFT (AMINOIMADAZOLE
TH EPAEIA TOY KAPKINOY 755 CARBOXAMIDE RIBONUCLEOTIDE FORMYLTRANSFERASE) .... 784
E IOO .................................................... 784
H ................................................................................ 755
.......................................................................... 784
O ...................................................................... 755
- ...................................................................... 756
.......................................... 756 787
.............................................. 756 ................................................................................ 787
Hodgkins ...... 757 O .............................................................. 787
...................................................... 757 O .............................................................. 789
............................................................ 758 TXD 258 (RPR 11625A) .......................................................... 789
.............................................................. 759 SB-T-1213 IDN 5109 (SB-T-110131) ................................ 790
Kaposi AIDS .................................... 759 RPR 109881A ........................................................................ 791
.............................................................. 760 BMS 185660 .......................................................................... 791
.................................................................. 761 BMS 184476 BMS 188797 2-acyl
- ...................................... 763 .................................................................. 792
- .................................................. 763 .......................................................................... 792
XXXVI OY

795
................................................ 822
H ................................................................................ 795

OI ...................................................................... 796 - ........................................ 822
ZD 0473 ................................................................................ 796
R 3464 .............................................................................. 797 .................................................. 822
A OY A .............................................. 797 .......................................... 822
(JM216) .......................................................... 797 - .. 823
- ............ 823
........................................................................ 798
- .................. 824
: SPI 077 ............................................ 798
.................................................................... 824
A .................................................................... 798
.......................................................................... 825
.......................................................................... 799


- 833
803
................................................................................ 833
................................................................................ 803 OO O OOE O OY
O O ............................................................ 804 OY AO ........................................................ 833
OOO O O ........................ 804
O .............. 806 EGFR .............................................................. 834
........................................................ 806 Cetuximab .............................................................................. 834
O O O .................. 806 ............................................ 836
.............................. 808 EGFR .................. 836
.................. 810 ZD 1839 (Iressa) ...................................................................... 836
................................ 810 OSI-774 (Tarceva) .................................................................. 837
............................................ 811 CI-1033 .................................................................................. 838
.......................................... 811 I OO O OOE HER2 .......................... 839
.................................... 811 Trastuzumab (Herceptin) ...................................................... 839
O .................................................................... 839
OO O ................................................ 811 .................................................................. 839
O OY POAOYN THN AEIOENEH ................ 813 .................................................................. 840
(FGFs) .................... 813 trastuzumab .................................................. 840
O VEGF (VEGF / VEGFR) ...................... 814 trastuzumab .................................... 840
VEGF .................................................. 814 Trastuzumab
VEGF .................................................................... 814 ................................................................................ 841
VEGF-A ...................................... 815 trastuzumab ................................................ 841
VEGF ...................................................................... 816 trastuzumab ................................................ 841
A Tie ...................................... 816 Trastuzumab .................................................. 841
M .................... 817 Trastuzumab .............................................. 842
-OO O .................................... 818 (adjuvant) .............. 842
-1 (TSP-1) .................................................. 818 (neoadjuvant) .......... 842
...................................................................... 819 trastuzumab ........................ 843
.......................................................................... 819 (NSCLC) .......... 843
........................................................................ 819 ................................................................ 843
-O .......................................... 820 STI571 (IMATINIB MESYLATE, GLEEVEC) ................................ 843
.................................................... 844
............................................................................ 821 .................................................................... 844
- .............................................. 822 OI OE .......................................... 845
.......................................................................... 846
.......................................................................... 822 I OO O VEGF .......................................... 847
OY XXXVII

SU 5416 ................................................................................ 847 M .............................................. 883


Bevacizumab (Avastin) .......................................................... 849 B .................................................... 883
OI O .......................... 850 O O O .................................... 884
............................................................ 850 .................................. 884
........................ 851 ........................................................ 884
.............................................................. 851 ................................................................ 885
.................................................................. 851 .......................................................... 885
.............................................................. 852 .................................................................... 885
OI ............................ 852 .................................................................. 886
Flavopiridol ............................................................................ 852 O O O ............ 886
UCN-01 .................................................................................. 853 O O O O OO .. 886
PKC412 .................................................................................. 854 O O OO .... 887
Antisense Oligonucleotides .................................................. 854 .......................................................................... 887
ISIS 5132 ................................................................................ 854
ISIS 3521 ................................................................................ 855 889
OI FARNESYL TRANSFERASE .......................... 855
O-O .............................................. 889
R115777 (Zarnestra) ............................................................ 857
OOO ................................................ 890
SCH66336 (Sarasar) .............................................................. 858 OO- O ................................................ 891
BMS-214662 .......................................................................... 859 O O ............................................ 891
L 778123 ................................................................................ 860 OO O
OI OO ............................................ 860 OOO ...................................................................... 891
PS-341 (Bortezomib) ............................................................ 860 .................................................................... 892
A .................................................................... 861 .......................................................................... 892
.......................................................................... 861

V Y
V
877 895
O O ........................ 877 OO IO ............................................................ 895
OO O .............................................. 877 O OY OO ........................................ 897
O O O ............................................................................ 897
(TERT) .................................................................................... 878 .................................................................. 897
, OO O .... 879 .............................................. 898
OOO O .............................. 880 .......................................................... 898
OO O OO O ............................................ 898
O O ...................................... 880
OO OO IO ........................ 899
O O
H ............................................ 899
O ............................ 880
O O (...) .......................... 900
O .......................................................... 881
.......................................................................... 900
O OO O ................ 881
( ...) .......................... 902
OO .................................................. 881
OO .............................................................................. 902
.......................................................................... 882
O ........................................................ 902
.................................................. 902
: 883 ................................................................................ 902
................................................................................ 883 ...................................................................... 902
O ........................................ 883 .......................................................................... 903
XXXVIII OY

................................................ 903 OOE E I ...... 913


................................................................................ 903 ...................................... 913
...................................................... 903 ...................................................... 914
.................................................... 904 .............................. 914
.......................................... 904 .............................................................. 915
................................................................ 915
(MST) ................ 904 E I ...................................................... 915
() .......................... 904 ............................................................ 915
.............................................................................. 904 ...................................................... 915
........................................................ 904 .................................................... 915
................................................................................ 905 .................................................... 915
...................... 905 ...................................................... 915
................................................................ 905 ........................................................................ 916
...................................................................... 905 .......................................... 916
.............................................. 905 .......................................................................... 917
.................................................................. 905
.............................................................. 906
...................................................................... 906 ,
...................................................................... 907 921
...................................................................... 907
OO OO
.................................................................. 907
O ........................................................................ 921
........................................................................ 907
(Signal trasduction) ........................ 924
() ............................ 907
OOO OO ...................................... 924
........................................................ 907 O OOO O
NMDA .................................. 907 OO .......................................................................... 925
................................................................ 908 A
...................................................................... 908 (Stem Cell Factor SCF) ........ 928
............................................................................ 908 ...................................... 929
OO O OO ...................... 908 .................................................................... 929
.......................................................................... 908 / -
.................................................................. 908 (GranUlocyte-Macrophage-Colony Stimulating
Factor GM-CSF) .................................................................. 929
...................................................................... 908
...................................... 929
.................................................................... 909
.................................................................... 930
................................................ 909


(GranUlocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor G-CSF) .............. 931
(Patient Controlled Analgesia PCA) .................................. 909
...................................... 931
........................................................ 909
.................................................................... 931
........................ 910
E (Erythropoietin EPO) .............................. 931
...................................................................... 910
...................................... 931
........................................................................ 911
.................................................................... 932
................................................................ 911
(Thrombopoietin TPO) ............................ 932
................................................................................ 911 ...................................... 932
.................................................... 911 .................................................................... 933
............................................................ 911 -11 (IL-11) ........................................................ 933
........................................ 912 ...................................... 933
O .......................................................... 912 .................................................................... 933
O .................................................. 912 O OO
O, H A, O .................... 912 O ........................................................................ 933
OY XXXIX

O O OO ...................... 934 .................................. 956


G-CSF G-CSF ........................ 934 1. ...................................... 956
.................................................... 934 2. .................................................................... 956
.................................................. 935 3. ................................................ 956
................................................ 935 4. ................................................................ 956
.................................................... 935 ........................................................................ 957
O ...................... 935 OH OH ...................................................... 957
O ............................ 935 ........................................ 957
O ...................................................................... 936 O (O) .................................... 958
O (O) ................................ 936 .......................................................................... 958
.................................. 936
.................................... 936

O (O) ............................ 936
961
() .............................. 936
E ................................................................................ 961
.............................................................................. 937 OOO O ................................ 961
H P ............................ 966
O O O
.............................................................................. 937 O ............................................................ 966
........................................................................ 938 O O OOO O
O O ............................................................................ 967
...................................................................... 938 ........................................ 967
.................................... 938 ........ 968
G-CSF O ............................................................................ 969
(Pegylated methionyl G-CSF, peg-filgrastime) .................... 938
O OO
O O O ...... 938 O O .............................................. 969
A (rHuEpo) .... 938 ........................................................ 969

...................................................................... 970
................................................................ 939
................................................................ 970

............................................................................ 939 ........................................................................ 971
/ .. 939 .................................................................... 972
() .............................. 939 O O O
O O ............................................................ 972

...................................................................... 940 O ...................................................................... 972
...................................................................... 940 ........................................................................ 972
O O OOO .................... 941 ........................................................................ 973
-11 (L-11) ........................................................ 941 ........................................................................ 973
.................................................................... 941 .................................................................... 973
.......................................................................... 941 OO 5-3
OO .......................................................................... 974
O .......................................................................... 974
-
........................................................................ 975
955
............................ 975
H ................................................................................ 955 ........................................ 975
OI .............................................................................. 955 .............................................. 975
.................................. 955 O I 5-3 OO I
.................................................. 955 O .......................................................................... 976
I ................................................................................ 955 5-3 O
................................................................ 955 O .................................................................... 976
XL OY

O -1 ................................ 977 ........ 1000


O .................................................... 978 ................ 1000
O .......................................................................... 978 A ........................................................................ 1000
........................................................................ 978 () .................................................... 1001
O OO O I O O .................................................................... 1002
O TTO ............................................................ 978 .................................................................. 1002
H E .................................................. 979 .............................................. 1002
I OO ........................................ 981 ............................ 1002
.......................................................................... 981 OI O OOY ........................................ 1003
O O OY .......................................................... 1003
985 ...................................... 1004
................................................................................ 985 .................................... 1004
OO OO OOO O ........................................ 1005
...................................................................... 985 O O A .................................................. 1005
O ........................................................................ 987 .................................................................. 1005
.......................................................... 987 .................... 1005
...................................................................... 988 OE OOE ................................................ 1006
............................ 988 ........................................................................ 1006
...... 988
1011
.................. 988
OH OH .......................................................... 1011
O ...... 989
OOOOOI, STRESS E ................ 1012
.................................................. 990
AO O OIO O OO I
.......................................................................... 991
O STRESS .......................................................................... 1013
OOOI AO IO .......................... 1014
993 .............................................. 1014
H ................................................................................ 993 O ...... 1014
I Y OO OI ................................ 993 .......... 1015
OOI AO O .......................... 993 O ...................................................... 1016
OO OI OOY OY .............. 994 O ........................................................ 1017
OE O ...................................................... 994 O
.................................................................... 1018
.............................................................................. 995 O .......................... 1019
O .................................................... 1020
.................................................. 995 E OE O O OO
E OE O ........................................ 997 OO E H
Gram ........................................................ 997 I ............................................................................ 1022
Listeria monocytogenes ........................................................ 997 ........................ 1022
Nocardia asteroides .............................................................. 997 ...................................... 1023
Gram .................................................. 997 H .................. 1024
Aeromonas species .............................................................. 997 ................ 1024
........................................ 997 ...................................... 1024
OOOI I OY OY ...................................... 1025
YO .............................................................................. 998 O I H H .......................... 1027

................................................................................ 999 ................................ 1028
................................ 999 ,
............................................ 999 .................................... 1030
OY XLI

E OI .... 1030 ANO O O :


................................................ 1030 O O ............................................ 1071
...................... 1031 O O O .......... 1077
............................ 1031 H OO OO O O ........ 1081
............ 1031 O O O O O .................... 1083
.............................................. 1031 O .... 1086
I OOOI .......................................... 1033 ................................ 1086
.................................................. 1086
O .............................................................. 1033
.................................................. 1087
O
................................................ 1087
.................................................................... 1034
.... 1088
O .................................. 1035
...................... 1088
O .................................................... 1035

,
........................................................................ 1090

O O: TO MEO
........................................................................ 1035
OO ...................................................................... 1093

........................................................................ 1097
.................................................................. 1039
H OE (BURN OUT)
I O
OI O OY ............................................ 1042 XVI

.................................... 1042

........................................................................ 1044
1107
.............................................................................. 1107
1053
OO ........................................................ 1107
H .............................................................................. 1053 .................................... 1107
OO OO OYO I OIO ........................................................ 1108
H .................................................................................... 1053 OO IO ...... 1108
OH EO OIO H .................................................................... 1108
YO OOOI .................................................. 1054
.................................................................. 1108
OO EO OO H .......................... 1054 OO O O O .......... 1110
OO OO H .................................... 1055 - .................................................................. 1111
...................................................... 1056 ................................................................................ 1111
............................ 1056 ...................................................... 1112
OO H I O .......... 1057 .......................................................... 1112
Y OH OO OO ...................................................... 1112
H OOE E E ................ 1057
/ .................................................................... 1112
IOO ............................................................................ 1058
.................................................................... 1113
........................................................................ 1059
............................................ 1113
O (Frail) .... 1113
O O
1063 .................................................................................. 1113
.............................................................................. 1063 O .......................................................... 1114
O O O O ........ 1064 ........................................................ 1114
: O O O .................................................................. 1114
O .......................................................................... 1066 .................................................................. 1115
AO O: OO O .................................................................. 1116
O O ........................................................ 1069 .................................................... 1116
XLII OY

.......................................................................... 1116 ...................................................... 1124


............................................ 1117 .......................................................... 1125
.............................................................. 1117 ...................................................................... 1125
O .................................................... 1117 ............................................................................ 1125
.............................................................. 1117 ...................................................... 1125
.................................................................. 1118 OOOI OO A Y .............. 1125
........................................................................ 1118 Hodgkin Hodgkins ............ 1125
...................................................................... 1125
1121 ................................................ 1125
EH .............................................................................. 1121 ...................................................... 1125
A OI .......................... 1121 .......................................................................... 1126
.................... 1121 ...................................................................... 1126
I OO A A Y .............. 1122 ...................................................... 1126
................................................................ 1122 AO I OO A Y .......... 1126
...................................................................... 1122 .............................................................. 1126
............................................................................ 1122 ........................................................ 1126
.............................................................................. 1122 ................................ 1126
( ) .................... 1123 ........................................................ 1126
( V) ...... 1123 ............................ 1126
.............................................. 1123 A OI ...................................... 1126
........................................................ 1123 A O O OY
K .......... 1124 O EO .......................................................................... 1127
................................................ 1124 I OH Y OOOY I
...................................................................... 1124 IO ........................................................................ 1128
............................................................................ 1124 ........................................................................ 1128

O ...................................................................................................................................................... i


B


. , . , . de Bree, . , . .......................... 5


.. , . ................................................................................ 55

: ,
. , . , . , . .................................................... 73



.. , . , . , . .............................. 91


. .................................................................................................................. 107
H EIPOYPIKH OKOOIA THN AAH TOY AINA
. T, M. X, E. de Bree, . , .

.
1/3

O. O
- . -
. - , , -
, - , .

,
-

- . O -
,
, . -
. . -
20 - -
.
100% . -

.
- , , -
- . -
- ,
, -O, -
O -
, O - . , -
O. - -
O- , -
, -
- .
,
, - -
.
- , - -
, , -
. , -
, -
, .
-
. (, ) -

5
6 OY

, . -
. -
,
- . 18 19
- , ,
-
O . O 3.
O Morgagni, Le Dran Da Salva -
O.
, -
.
, -
. -
. O Perci-
. val Pott (17141788)
.-. . -
. 1829 Joseph Recamier (17741852) -
O O O . -
OOO Ephraim
- McDowell 1809 -
3.000 , 30 4.
- O -
Edwin Smith -
. , -
. -
1 (. 1).
O (460375 ..) ,
, - Crawford Long (18151878) William T.G. Mor-
- ton (18191868). O John Collins Warren5 1846
, . O
-
2. O (Surgical
- Observations on Tumors, 1838). O Joseph Lister (1827
. 18 1912)6 -
, -
1.500 , - .
, - ,
. - , X O
18 20
- .
-
. -
O-
. O Al-
bert Theodore Billroth
, , -
. William
Stewart Halsted -

1. - (. 2). -
(1600 ..). , -
. 7

3. O Halsted Theodor Kocher


2. O Halsted Bern .
1904
.

-
7-8 (. 3). (,
- , ,
, 1 2. )9.
- -
,
-
, - - -

1. O

1775 Percival Pott


1809 Ephraim McDowell
1829 Joseph Recamier
1846 John Collins Warren
1867 Joseph Lister
1873 Albert Theodore Billroth
1878 Richard von Volkman
1880 O Albert Theodore Billroth
1881 Albert Theodore Billroth
1890 William Stewart Halsted
1896 G. T. Beatson
1904 Hugh H. Young
1906 Ernest Wertheim
1908 W. Ernest Miles
1909 (Nobel Prize) Theodore Emil Kocher
1910 Harvey Cushing
1912 E. Martin
1913 O Franz Torek
1927 George Divis
1933 Evarts Graham
1935 Allen O. Whipple
1945 Charles B. Huggins
1957 Oliver Creech
1958 O NSABP Bernard Fisher

NSABP: National Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project


8 OY

2. Nobel

1909 EMIL THEODOR KOCHER ,


1912 SIR FREDERICK GRANT BANTING
JOHN JAMES RICHARD MACLEOD
1923 ALEXIS CARREL -

1934 GEORGE HOYT WHIPPLE, GEORGE RICHARDS MINOT
WILLIAM PARRY MURPHY
1956 ANDR FRDRIC COURNAND, WERNER FORSSMANN
DICKINSON W. RICHARDS
1966 CHARLES BRENTON HUGGINS O
1990 JOSEPH E. MURRAY E. DONNALL THOMAS

. - , -
-
. -
,
- .
10-11. , -
X O-
Sir .
John Erichsen, B Medical Insti- .
tutions University College, 1873!!
Lancet: ...

1. Breasted JH. The Edwin Smith surgical papyrus. Chicago: MI: 7. Modlin IM. Surgical triumvirate of Theodor Kocher, Harvey
University of Chicago Press, 1930. Cushing and William Halsted. World J Surg 1998; 22: 103-13.
2. Hill GJ II. Historic milestones in cancer surgery. Semin Oncol 8. Wangensteen OH. Has medical history importance for sur-
1979; 6: 409-427. geons? Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975; 140: 434.
3. Hayward OS. The history of oncology. I. Early oncology and 9. Povoski SP. Novel applications of Endo GIA linear staplers
the literature of discovery. Surgery 1965; 58: 460. during pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy.
4. Thorwald J. Science and the secrets of early medicine. New Am J Surg 2001; 82: 77-80.
York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1962. 10. Giuliano , Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lym-
5. Moore FD. John Collins Warren and his act of conscience: a phatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast can-
brief narrative of the trial and triumph of a great surgeon. Ann cer. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 391-398.
Surg 1999; 229: 187-96. 11. Tanabe KK, Curley SA, Dodd GD, Siperstein AE, Goldberg
6. Cartwright FF. Background to medicine. Surgery in the period SN. Radiofrequency ablation. Cancer 2004; 100: 641-650.
between John Hunter and Joseph Lister. Teach In. 1972; 1:
435-41.
. 9

O OO O ,
OOO -
, . O -
-
-
. -
-

. -


.
, .

O
, -
-
,

, -
.
, -
, - . -
, -
, - , -
- ,
-
, ,
. .
- -
O, , (tu-
- mor).
. -
.
, -
OOO O O OO
. -
. -
, .
. ,
, - . -
, . -
-
-
. . -

, -
, - ,
, . -
- , , -
. - ,
-
, .. -
, . -
.. , -
, , , -
, - .., -
- . , -
, .. ,
, .. ,
. - .
10 OY

. - -
-
, - .
. () -
( ) , , -
(, - ,
) , - ,
.
, -
.
, - ,
. -
. -
OOO O O OOO -
,
. - en block
,
. , ,
- .
. , -
, -
, - -
-
.. - . -

. . -
.
-
, -
, - .
- , -
, -
. ,
. -
. - -
1 . , -
. - () -
, -
, 2 . () -
. - ,
- -.
5 .,
10 .
. - -
- , -
-
, -
. -
- .
, - , -
, - -
. 11

, - , , .
4 -
. 5 -
,
.
-


.



, -
, -

. -
,

. O
, , -

.
O -
-

E 4. -
, .
().
, - AMC A MA MC C
MAC AM M CM ,
MCA AD
CMA
*
(). O 1 N2
- 2 Option N2
3
, - 4sa Option
. 4sb
4d N1 Option
O - 5 Option
6 Option
- 7 N2
- 8a
8p
- 9
N3

. 10 Option N2
11
- 12 N3
, - 13
14a Option
. 14v N3
, 15 Option
16a2, b1 N3
, 16a1, b2 Option
1, 2, 3 17 Option
18 Option
.. - 19 Option N3 N2
(, , , ) - 20 N3 Option N2 N1
E 5. -
1, 2, 3 4. 1, 2, 3,
.
12 OY

1, 2 , , -
3 . ,
. R0
1, Residual,
D1. 1 -
2, D2 D3 -
D4. -
. -
-
. -
-
. - , -
15 .
. - , -
, . O -
. -
-
- ,
(stage migration Will Rogers effect)
. R0.
- . -
,
- -
. - . O -

- -
,
. - R0,
-
. ,
-
. - , -
,
, R1. -

, -
,
, -
(- R2.
). . -
-
OOO O O O
O , , ,
. - .. -
(curative intent) - ,
,
. -
. -
- . -
- ,
. - -
. 13

- -
- .
, , - O
, - -
-
. (, , -
. )
( , -
, -
- ) , -
. -
(, -
, . - ..). O
- , -
. - ,

, . -
(salvage treat- .
ment). ,
().
, - -
.
(. ).
OOO O O ON OO

- . -
. -
. -
cytoredu- ,
ction debulking. -
.
- . -
, ,
, . .

,
- -
. - .
-
() - . -
,
. - --
, , . -
..
- -
. -
(. - --
).
, -
. , -
- -
14 OY

-
, , .
, - -
-
:
. - 1.
. -
, ,
. 1.
, , -
O OOOO - OO H , , -
- ,
, , -
- , , ..
. 2. -
-
, 1. .
-
, - , -
- ,
, 1. - ..
3. -
, , -
, ,
- .
. 4.
20501. , ,
.
, 5.
, - -
, - .
. - ) -
- , , .
, )
.
. O
. -
,
- . O
. , - -
, , , - , .
-
, - .
-
. .
. - O :
, - 1. ,
2. ,
. 3. ,
- 4.
-- 5. .
. 15

-
-
. trocars .
-
- ,
, , - -
. ,
- ,
. , .
O -
, - . O
1015 . ,
. , , , -
, - .. -
- , , .., -
. , -
- -
, - -
. .
-
. .
- -
, ,
, - ,
. - -
- . O
-
- - .
() -
. (performance status) -
O . O -
- Karnofsky ECOG-WHO (. 3)2,3.
. - ,
. ,
, -
( seed . -
and soil) . O - -
, - .
, , , -
, .., , ,
. . .. -
- , -
, -
- , -
. - , ,
- ..
- .
-
.
- . -
- -
16 OY

3. (performance status)

Karnofsky scale2

100 ,
90 ,
80 ,
70 ,
60
50 ,
40 , ,
30 .
20
10
0
ECOG-WHO 3

0 O
1
2 50% ,
3 . 50%
4 .

. 5.
- .
-
, - , ,
, -
- , -
. .
, , -

,
. . O

-
- .
, ,
. , -
, -
. -
, . -
4. , -
- .
-
-
. -
, -
.


1. Edwards BK, Howe HL, Ries LAG, Thun MJ, Rosenberg HM, the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1999, featuring impli-
Yancik R, Wingo PA, Jemal A, Feigal EG. Annual report to cations of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden. Cancer 2002;
. 17

94: 2766-2792. 1982; 5: 649-655.


2. Karnofsky DA, Abelmann WH, Craver LF, Burchenal. The use 4. Meyerowitz BE. Quality of life in breast cancer patients: the
of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of cancer. Can- contribution of data to the care of patients. Eur J Cancer 1993;
cer 1948; 1: 634-656. 29A Suppl 1: S59-62.
3. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, 5. Refaat Y, Gunnoe J, Hornicek FJ, Mankin HJ. Comparison of
McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of quality of life after amputation or limb salvage. Clin Orthop
the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 2002; 397: 298-305.

O OO O
O OO OOOO O -
- -
, , -
. ,
- -
-
, -
.
. - -
,
( )
,
. -
-
. -
/ -
O . -
- -
. ,
- -
.
-

(.. ). -
, -
-
, , , -
,
.
-
. -
- in
- situ (LCIS) -

1,2. - .
X O -
- BRCA 1
- BRCA 2, -
-
- 3,*.
-
.

* O (cumulative risk) 4085%


3.
18 OY

, , - (Familial Ade-
, nomatous Polyposis FAP).
- HNPCC
. ( 15% -
) - . O
-
- / , -
. .
- , , -
4 -
. - (mismatch repair genes, hMSH2,
1394, 6395 1.5006 - hMLH1, hPMS2 hMSH6), -
-
- . , ,
90% (
-
. - ).
, -
, - , -
- / ,
. ( -
- ).
. -
-
adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) -
BRCA 1

BRCA 2 -
100% . 25%
-
FAP -

. 50%

( )
*.
. -
, -
-
, -
100 -

100%
. O 551 (-
-
)7 170 ()8 -
11 2 - 40 .
- , -
- -
(2,3% 1% ).
.

- FAP (attenuated FAP).
/ - -

: - HNPCC.
(Hereditary Non- -
Polyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome HNPCC) (

* O (cumulative risk) 560%


3.
. 19

), () 2, -
. -
- -
, - (MTC) (
. - FMTC) -
- , , -
. - ( 2), ,
FAP -
- Marfan (MEN 2B)11. -

- MEN 2A / FMTC 46 .
. , MEN 2B,
, -

1 .
- -
-
Barrett - 24 .
(HGD),
9. * -
( . -
) , -
(occult) , -
. HGD - , -
Barrett ,
, - -
.
HGD .
,
16% HGD
7
. - ,
- ,
.
. O -
CDH1 -cadherin ( , , -
- ..) -
10. (.. , ..). -
18 ,
70% -
38 - / (.. ),
.
. O - .

612 .
. -
, -
- .
-

* An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.


20 OY

-
, -
,
.

O. -

..., -
. -
-
/ . -

/ - (over / 6. .
under-treatment) .
], (rucut
- ), (incisional biopsy)
(excisional biopsy).
(. 6) -
,
, ,
, ..
, -
- . -
. . 12
- -


(, , ..), -
.
(, ,

, ..) -
-
(. ).
. -
.
* -
- -
. O .
- -
, -
, .
- (. 7)
. ** -
O - . -
, - .
-
[Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) - -

* , 100 , 2% , -
2 o 25%!!!
FNA , 8% ( ).
30%13!!
** : 6798%, 7590%, 115%14,15,16. % -

Trucut17.
. 21


.

. -

,
. O -
-
-

-
-
7. trucut .
. O

( ) -
. -
-
, -
-
(.. / ),
, -
.
,
:
1.

(..
rucut /
-
8. . ).
2. O
-
. O .
(Trucut FNA) - -
. -
, -
(US .
CT - ) (. 3. . -
8). H - .
.
- (tourniquet) -
( , - .
), - 4.
( ) -
. .
(incisional biopsy) - 5. -
. . -
- ,
set
. .
.
22 OY

6. , - -
- .
.

7. clips (
-
)
.
-

.

8. ,
/

. O
. -


.
(-
-
, ..).
. FNA
rucut . -
,
. -
9. .
- -
. ,
10. . O -
/ - -
/ FNA /
. Trucut .
11.O ,
. .
-
- ( -
.
12. ).
, , -

.
13. , - -
, ,
- ,
- .
-
.
, -
14. -
,
-
.
.
, -
15. -
FNA / Trucut.

, -

rucut (
(
). O
).
-
16. , -
- . - ,
- - (tattoo),
. -
O .
. 23

, - 4.
(
. ).
5. -
. , -
,
O () - .
O

O -

- / *.
, - O :
. - 1. O -
.
39% - 2. .
18. 3. .
, 4.
, (,
(. 9) , ..).
. -
O : :
1. - 1. O -
- -
. 90%
2. 20 20.
(FNA, Trucut) 2.
. ,
3. . , -

9. -
, . -
, , ,
.., ,
, , , , -
, , , , (
, , ) -
. -
,

,
.

* ,
19.
24 OY

, -
. ,
3. (clinical outcome).
- O
- -
. . -
4.
. O
,
.
5. O (
, .
, , - O / -
). :
6. O - 1.
, ( ).
. 2. ( -
7. ).
. 3. ( ,
8. - ), ,
, ..

21. O - ,
. O - ,
- ,
. .

,
, - (grade)
- (
,
- ). , -
. *
-
. (1,2) (. 10).
- 3,
() - -
. - ,
, - ( ),
.
. -
(Prognostic)
(Predictive) -
O
/ - .
, O (genomics, proteomics)

* , ,
, , , , . -
/ , / / .
. 25


10.
. -

.
,
(second tier lymph nodes)
. -



.
2

-
-
,
.


-
-
. ,
.

-
. O -

-

(head to head) /
. -
,

11. / (meta-analysis) -
. .
. (
) / -
-
(. 11) /
- (risk), (-
, ), (.. -
- ) (,
. ). O -
HER2 / neu,
p53, - .
22,23,24.
O ,
, -
. - .
HER2 , -
-
, -
26 OY

*. ( ). ..
60% 5
- 36% 5
25 - ,
: 40% [(60 - 36%)/60%].
(-
) -
, (baseli-
ne odds). .. 30% - -
5 , - 0 ( 1 ) -
. 1 ( )26.
(annual odds of ,
recurrence), -
. 01 . -

(absolute benefit), -
- -
- -
. .. 60% - . -
5 -
36% 5 , , , -
24% (60 - 36%).
(relative odds re- . -
duction), - ( -
( ) )
( , , )

4.

:
1988
1988

985.000 0,135 133.000 494.000 66.700


152.000 0,263 40.000 139.000 36.500
135.900 0,158 21.500 42.300 6.700
-O 147.000 0,045 6.600 61.500 2.750
O 68.900 0,128 8.800 20.000 2.550
27.300 0,37 10.100 5.800 2.150
99.000 0,053 5.250 28.000 1.500
27.000 0,04 1.100 24.500 1.000
26.900 0,06 1.600 18.100 1.100
39.100 0,038 1.500 18.000 700
14.000 0,04 550 10.900 450
. 70.700 0,015 1.050 23.100 350

Wright D and Delaney T. Treatment of metastatic cancer. In: DeVita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S, eds. Cancer. Principles
and Practice of Oncology. 1989; Chapter 62: 2245-2332.

* , ,
. (
). , 2
3 6 3 .
. 27

- .
. , -
-
,
(. . O -
4)27. . -
- -
-
(, , - 28. -
..). -
- (1,2) . -
. -
/ -
. -
. -
/
85 . -

. .

(.. ). ,
4 : (cTNM),
(sTNM), (pTNM) -
(aTNM). - .
,
* -
-
**.
, - -
. . O
: (),
, - .
() - -
(). (in vitro)
(re-treat- -
ment TNM / rTNM), - -
in vivo. -
-
- . O -
.
. , -
, , -
, - . -
. -
- . -

* , ,
.
** ,
.
28 OY

-
. ,
, -
- . -
. - -

/ - , -
, ,
.
.
. O
-
- . O
-
- .
- Wilms 75% -
-
1920 1940. 40% -
- .
, ,
(R0). ,
-
, 70% . -
,

12. - .

, -
, - -
en block - 12. -
,
,
. 5 ,
- 29. -
50% 80% -
- .
. -
Halsted /
- -
, 30% - -
- -
. (R1) (R2) ,
,
. .
, - ,

(debulking),

. - , -
.
( ) -
. 29

40 22,7 33,9 (50% -


38 ) (. 12).
()

36

34
-
32
-
30
. O -
28
*
26
-
24
(, , ) -
22
( -
20
0 20 40 60 80 100 ) -
(%) **.
,
12. -
-
. Bristow R, et al. JCO 2002; 20: 1248-1259. , -
.
, , - . O -
. , -
- -
(non-cancer directed surgery).

(.. ) - -
.

, , /
-
.
first order ki-
- netics.

.
. -
-
- -
12. , -
. -30 . zero
81 6.885 order kinetics, -
19891998 -
10% .
5,5 -
. 25% / -
> 75% -

* O . 80% 2 -
. O -
(.. ).
** : ) , , )
, ) , )
, ) , ,
) .
30 OY


. -



,
, -
.


13. .

-
, -
.
-

. -
, -

. -

.

14.
- .
30% .
- O
,
. - . :
- 1. -

. - . -
-
, .
, 2. -
- (radiofrequency
per se. - ablation) (. 13),
- argon (ultra-cold liquid argon gas-
, cryoablation) (. 14) -
- .
(therapeutic intent). -
- .
. - 3.

,
. ,

, : , (. ).
,
,
-
. -
. 31

, 5. -
-
, .
O : O +

1. . -
78% 8% 1%
. 69% 21% 2,7%
50% 29% 10,4%
, - O 5% 3,5%
-
. O
70%
. 6. -
2. . - O Organization
Mondiale de Gastro Enterologie (OMGE), 1986
. -
- (%)
10.320
. O - 3.507 34
O 2.895 28,1
O 1.005 9,7
- 423 4,1
O 413 4
. O 302 2,9
3. . , - 295 2,9
, , , 253 2,5
. 159 1,5
151 1,5
4. .
146 1,4
) : , , 647 6,3
, , ,
, , ,
, - , -
.
) : - . O
, , - ( , )
.
) - -
: , , , - .
. O
) : i. : , ,
-
, / . ii. : -

, .
-
- , . O
-
. - -
- (, / )
-
. -
(. 5). O ,
Top 10 ,
(. 6)31. -
O -
- ,
32 OY

- , .
, , ,

1. , , , . 132(8): 815-8; discussion 819-21.


- 16. White R, Halperin T, Olson J, Soo M, Bentley R, Seigler H.
Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical manage-
. . 1998; 70: 553-563. ment of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 2001 Jun;
2. , , . 233(6): 769-77.
. - 17. Shah V, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand
1997; 2: 77-86. V. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: An analy-
3. Taucher S, Gnant M, Jakes . Preventive mastectomy in pa- sis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 conse-
tients at breast cancer risk due to genetic alterations in the cutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 2003; 97: 1824-31.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 388: 18. Zarbo R, Schmidt W, Bachner P, et al. Indications and imme-
3-8. diate patient outcomes of pathology intraoperative consulta-
4. Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten W, et al. Breast tions. College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease
cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group Study. Arch
BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Eng J Med 2001; 345: 159-164. Pathol Lab Med 1996 Jan; 120(1): 19-25.
5. Hartmann L, Schaid D, Woods J, et al. Efficacy of bilateral 19. Weiss S, Willis J, Goldblum J, Greenfield L. Frozen section
prophylactic mastectomy in women with family history of breast consultation. Utilization patterns and knowledge base of sur-
cancer. N Eng J Med 1999; 340: 77-84. gical faculty at a university hospital. Am J Clin Pathol 1995
6. Pennisi V, Capozzi A. Subcutaneous mastectomy data: a final Sep; 104(3): 294-8.
statistical analysis of 1500 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1989; 20. Novis D, Zarbo R. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen se-
13: 15-21. ction turnaround time. A College of American Pathologists Q-
7. Rebbeck T, Lynch H, Neuhausen S, et al. For the Prevention Probes study of 32,868 frozen sections in 700 hospitals. Arch
and observation of surgical end points study group. Prophyla- Pathol Lab Med 1997 Jun; 121(6): 559-67.
ctic orthorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. 21. Gephardt G, Sarbo R. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen
N Eng J Med 2002; 346: 1616-1622. section consultations. A college of American Pathologists Q-
8. Kauf N, Satagopan J, Robson M, et al. Risk reducing salpingo- Probes study of 90,538 cases in 461 institutions. Arch Pathol
ophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Lab Med 1996 Sep; 120(9): 804-9.
N Eng J Med 2002; 346: 1609-1615. 22. Camp-Sorrell D. Antiangiogenesis: the fifth cancer treatment
9. Heitmiller R. Prophylactic esophagectomy in Barrett esopha- modality? Review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003; 30(6): 934-44.
gus with high grade dysplasia. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 23. Menard S, Pupa SM, Campiglio M, Tagliabue E. Biologic and
388: 83-87. therapeutic role of HER2 in cancer. Review. Oncogene 2003
10. Schwartz A. Preventive gastrectomy in patients with gastric Sep 29; 22(42): 6570-8.
cancer risk due to genetic alterations of the E-cadherin gene 24. Fridman JS, Lowe SW. Control of apoptosis by p53. Review.
defect. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 388: 27-32. Oncogene 2003 Dec 8; 22(56): 9030-40.
11. Frilling A, Weber F, Tecklenborg C, Broelsch C. Prophylactic 25. Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer, NIH Consensus Deve-
thyroidectomy in multiple endocrine neoplasia: the impact of lopment Conference Statement, Nov 1-2, 2000.
molecular mechanisms of RET proto-oncogene. Langenbecks 26. , .
Arch Surg 2003; 388: 17-26. . . 1997; 69: 502-512.
12. Rosenberg S. Principles of Surgical Oncology. In: Devita V, 27. Wright D, Delaney T. Treatment of metastatic cancer. In: De-
Hellman S, Rosenberg S, eds. Cancer. Principles and Practice vita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S, eds. Cancer. Principles and
of Oncology. 1989; Chapter 14: 236-246. Practice of Oncology. 1989; Chapter 62: 2245-2332.
13. Ljung B, Drejet A, Chiampi N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 28. Singletary E, et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee
fine needle aspiration biopsy is determined by physician train- on Cancer Staging System for Breast Cancer. J CLin Oncol
ing in sampling technique. Cancer 2001 Aug 25; 93(4): 263-8. 2002; 20: 3628-3636.
14. Jackman R, Nowels K, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni F, Finkel- 29. Dripps RD, Eckenhoff JE, Vandam LD. Introduction to Ane-
stein S, Shepard M. Stereotactic, Automated, Large-Core sthesia. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1977.
Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: False-Negative 30. Bristow R, Tomacruz R, Armstrong D, Trimble E, Montz F.
and Histologic Underestimation Rates after Long-term Fol- Surgical effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced
low-up. Radiology 1999; 210: 799-805. ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: A meta-analysis.
15. Acheson M, Patton R, Howisey R, Lane R, Morgan A. Histo- JCO 2002; 20: 1248-1259.
logic correlation of image-guided core biopsy with excisional 31. DeDombal FT. Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Churchill
biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Arch Surg. 1997 Aug; Livingston, 1986.
. 33

O O -
O , -
O
- -
. - .
, - O O OO-O-
-
-
O
-

. .
3040% ,
.
. (. 7).
- O -
. - -
en block
- . O -
-
, - .
-
. (infusion)
( -
) (per-
- fusion) -

1.
.
O -
- , -
1920. - ( ) (-
-
, 7
DNA, -
- O ()
. -
(Intra-arterial infusion)
-
. - /
5060%
,

-
(solation Perfusion)
. - / /
- (Isolated Limb Perfusion ILP)
, ,
O
.

- (CHPPC)
( -
) ( ). -
( (Radiofrequency ablation RF)
(Cryotherapy)
-

). -
34 OY

-) -
.
. in
vitro,
1950 ,
Klopp2, -
.
. -
1960 - Eckman5.
-
:
, Krementz3
CL
- Advantage = 1 +
(solated Limb Perfu- QA (1 EX)
sion ILP) -
. CL: , QA:
O , Ex: .
- ,
- ( CL)
. ( QA), -
- , - -
(first (. 8).
passage effect), -
,
. 8. -
Collins4 1981 -
-
A O
(steep-dose response), A

-
. in vitro
-
O
1 10 g/ml (. 15).

-
First passage effect
. O -
-


100


75


R%

50


25
Ivalon, Gelfoam, Lipiodol, ,
,
0
0,01 0,1 1 10 100 C
DSM-Spherex
15. -
(steep-dose response). H (Haemofiltration)
1 10 g/ml.
. 35

O -

.
, -
6: .
, -
, . :
-
, , , ,
.
- .
,
. -
(FUDR), 5-FU, -
-

-
(9499%) -

,
-
5-FU, , MMC 9.
-
-
.
-
O -
-


, -
.
7.

-
. (
,
) / -
1033% 50%, -
,
.
.
Pape8 et al,
,
-
, -
-
(. 16).
, -
-,

7 ,
-
FUDR 5-FU (41%
.
14% , -
-
16 13)9.
/ -
-
.
-
()
- .
. O 40 .
-
( ), . -
.
- .
1 mm - O / -
-
. -
- ,
:
.
36 OY

16.
.
( ).

17. block . -
stop-flow, -
, ( ).

, -
, ,
, - 10.
, ,
, - .
- .
7 (. 17). -

- , -
(. 8). . -
O -
. 37

, - -
( )
. - -
, Aigner 1990 11.
- stop-flow
. -
O - , -
-
.
2550% pH.
6 12 . ,
- (L-PAM), (DXR) -
- (MMC). -
20 , , SF micro-emboliza-
. tion,
-
- .
, -
, -
. .
-

,
(Isolation Perfusion)
(perfusion)
/ / stop-flow perfusion isolated perfusion.

- ,
- 20.

- -
. -
(. 18).
. -

18.
(Stop-flow/
Isolated perfusion). -

,

( ).
-
.
-



20.
-

-
.


38 OY

19. -
(stop-flow) ( ).

20.
(stop-flow) ( ).

, , (Isolated Limb Perfusion ILP)


, , , .., -
- -
. 14.
12,13: ( 30 -
- )
. -
(,
) (. 21).
. 10% -
(in-transit)
46 -
. - .
083%, -
(> 50% ) ,
- ,
. . ILP -
(, - 50% -
) , 6080% ,
(. 19, 20). .
. 39

21. in-transit . O , -
ILP .
( ).

F (tumor necrosis factor)


-
- -

100%. -
-
-
.
O TNF, - -

. -

8090% .
-
. -

- 22. -
(Continuous Hy-
, -
perthermic Peritoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy CHPPC)
17 ( ).
-
. - -
, :
15, 16, -
,
(. 22).
40 OY

23. CHPPC -
. , -
. , -
( ).

O 23 mm. -
-
. (. 23).
O -
, ,
- (-)
(. 24).

24. . (
) , -
,
( ).
. 41

(Radiofrequency ablation
RF) -
, ,
(100500 kHz), - ,
/ - . O 46 .
-
. - -
- 35 cm,
, - 3680%20. -
96%
, -
. -
. -
,
, -
, -
,
. -
, heat-shock
.
18. O
6 O O
56 cm, - O
(adjuvant) -
15 cm (. 25). , , -
- -
, - ,
, , , , -
. - ,
, . -
- -
- ,
, , , , -
. . -
, , -
. -
- (IL-2 INF-),
19. - .

25. . -
. ( ).
42 OY

, ,
- ,
.
(- -
-) (- .
-) -
. , -
(mul- . -
tidisciplinary approach) - -
, ,
.., - . O -
-
. .
-
, -
. . ,
. - -
50% -
, -
,
-
-
.

,
75% -

21.

-
. -
. O
- -
, - , .
. - ,
. O , -
, -
. . -
-
- ,
. -
- -
, ,
, - . O
.

-
. - .
, - , -
-
. -
, , -

. - .
-
. 43

1. Pollock R, Morton D. Principles of Surgical Oncology. In: out hemofiltration: a pilot study of patients with recurrent un-
Holland, Frei, eds. Cancer Medicine. 5th ed. 2000: 448-458. resectable rectal cancer. J Clin Pharmacol 1998 Oct; 38(10):
2. Klopp CT, Alford TC, Bateman J, et al. Fractionated intra-ar- 936-44.
terial cancer chemotherapy with bis-amine hydrochloride: A 13. Guadagni S, Russo F, Abate G, Pozone T, Capannolo B, Mar-
preliminary report. Ann Surg 1950; 132: 811-832. sili L, et al. Stop-flow in mediastinum and thorax for resistant
3. Krementz ET. End results in the treatment of sarcoma by per- lymphoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2000 Mar-Apr; 47(32): 378-
fusion with chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Chemother Rep 82.
1960 Dec; 10: 83-7. 14. Lejeune FJ, Kroon BB, Di Filippo F, Hoekstra HJ, Santinami
4. Collins JM, Dedrick RL. Pharmacocinetics of anticancer drugs. , Lienard D, Eggermont AM. Isolated limb perfusion: the
In: Chabner . Pharmacologic principles of cancer treatment. European experience. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2001; 10(4):
Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1982: 77-99. 821-32.
5. Eckman WW, Patlak CS, Fenstermacher JD. A critical evalua- 15. Sugarbaker PH. Management of peritoneal-surface malignan-
cy: the surgeons role. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1999 Dec; 384
tion of the principles governing the advantages of intra-arterial
(6): 576-87.
infusions. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1974 Jan; 2(3): 257-85.
16. de Bree E, Romanos J, Michalakis J, Relakis K, Georgoulias
6. Aigner KR. Intra-arterial infusion: overview and novel approa-
V, Melissas J, Tsiftsis D. Intraoperative hyperthermic intrape-
ches. Semin Surg Oncol 1998 Apr-May; 14(3): 248-53.
ritoneal chemotherapy with docetaxel as second-line treatment
7. Aigner KR. Regional chemotherapy-Editorial review article. for peritoneal carcinomatosis of gynaecological origin. Anti-
Reg Cancer Treat 1994; 2: 55-66. cancer Res 2003 May-Jun; 23(3C): 3019-27.
8. Pape H, Geismar D, Schmid G. Capillar density in preirradiat- 17. Tsiftsis D, de Bree E, Romanos J, Petrou A, Sanidas E, Asko-
ed breast cancer to predict chemotherapeutic response. Reg xylakis J, et al. Peritoneal expansion by artificially produced as-
Cancer Treat 1993; Suppl I: 40. cites during perfusion chemotherapy. Arch Surg 1999 May;
9. Dizon D, Kemeny N. Intrahepatic arterial infusion of chemo- 134(5): 545-9.
therapy: Clinical results. Sem Oncol 2002; 29(2): 126-135. 18. Parikh A, Curley S, Fornage B, Ellis L. Radiofrequency abla-
10. Sullivan K. Hepatic artery chemoembolization. Sem Oncol tion of hepatic metastases. Sem Oncol 2002; 29(2): 168-182.
2002; 29(2): 145-151. 19. Sotsky T, Ravikumar T. Cryotherapy in the treatment of liver
11. Pilati P, Mocellin S, Miotto D, Rossi CR, Codello L, et al. metastases from colorectal cancer. Sem Oncol 2002; 29(2):
Stop-flow technique for loco-regional delivery of antiblastic 183-191.
agents: literature review and personal experience. EJSO 2002; 20. Giovannini M. Percutaneous alcohol ablation for liver meta-
28: 544-553. stasis. Sem Oncol 2002; 29(2): 192-195.
12. Guadagni S, Aigner KR, Palumbo G, Cantore M, Fiorentini 21. Antman , Eilber FR, Shiu MH. Soft tissue sarcomas: cur-
G, Pozone T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of mitomycin C in pelvic rent trends in diagnosis and management. Curr Prob Cancer
stopflow infusion and hypoxic pelvic perfusion with and with- 1989; 13: 339-367.

O OO IO O OOO- ,
O H
, - ,
. O
-
. , , -
. -
-
-
. .
- -
- 30 -
-
. .
, - .
,
. :
44 OY

1. . OI OO
2.
. , -
3. . -
4. O . ,
.
5. - -
. , -
6. . -
7. . -

-
-
7 -

100.000 1.
.
71,4 10.000
-
:
20%
1. (ASA III-V

ASA I/II, : 10,65).
3,4.
2. (-
: 4,44). H O
3. ( - -
, : 3,82). .
4. (> 80 < 60 ,
: 3,29) . -
5. O - -
(12 > 3, - -
: 2,94). . 32.223
Dripps et al5
O H

. -
-
(American Society ASA I
of Anesthesiologists ASA) - , 1 16.000 -
, . -
ASA I ASA V (. 9), (.
2. 10).

9.
(ASA)

ASA I , , .

ASA II

ASA III ,
ASA IV (performance status)
ASA V 24
, ,
, , .. .
ASA V

. 45

10. Dripps et al

ASA I 16.192 0 < 0,006


ASA II 12.154 7 0,058
ASA III 4.070 11 0,27
ASA IV 720 17 2,4
ASA V 87 4 4,6
33.223 39 0,12

ASA I - -
-
. -
.
-
.
, - -
-
6. ,
485.850 - , -
1986 ,
55% 6%. -
ASA 1 185.000 - 55% 2%9,10.
7. -
1976 1988, Eichorn8 - , -
1 200.000 , 0,3%. -
ASA I II. - -
, -
- : -
(, -
. - ..) ; -
-
ASA I II, - , -
.
0,001% 0,01%.
E OE
, -

. -

E OE :
Goldman et al9 1 :
, - (.. -
).
- 2 : -
. - (.. ).
- 3 :
(.. -
. O - ).
4 : .
, , - -
46 OY

, - , :
, , 1. .
, 2. .
, . - 3. - -
- .
4. -
- .
, - 5. -
- .
. 6.
- 7. 14.
40%
1/5 , O H
11. - -
:
1. .
2. - 17.000 Palm-
. berg Hirsjarvi15.
3. . 70 0,25%,
4. 70 9,2%.
. 36%
5. .
6. . 8% . O -
7.
8. . 75% ,
,
- . O Hosking et al16
-
20 - 800 90 .
10. ,
O , ASA
, - -
- .
. , - O -
. -
- ,
- , -
11. .
- 17,18.
(maximum voluntary ventilation) - 80 9 7 -
. 5 -
, - 90 40% 30% ,
12. 95 23% 17% -
, - 17.
, - -
13. .
-
O
50% O OOOO H
14. O , -
. -
. 47

- : ,
. - ,
- .
,

- . -
. ,
.
- .
. - , -
, , -
- . , -
. -

,
- 22.
. - -
-
, - . -
19. , -
- ,
- . ,
,
,
. -
- , .
, .
-
- . O -
. - . -
- O-
-
. -
20,21. -
-
22. -
- .

1. Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Tate RB. Does anaesthesia contribu- 5. Drips RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anaesthesia in
te to operative mortality? JAMA 1988; 260: 2859-2863. surgical mortality. JAMA 1961; 178: 261-266.
2. Cullen DJ, Apolone G, Greenfield S, Guadagnoli E, Cleary P. 6. Eichhorn JH. Documenting improved anaesthesia outcome. J
ASA Physical Status and age predict morbidity after three sur- Clin Anesth 1991; 3: 351-353.
gical procedures. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 3-9. 7. Buck N, Devlin HB, Lunn JN. Report on the confidential en-
3. Feuer DJ, Broadley KE, Shepherd JH, Barton DP. Systematic quiry into operative deaths. London: Nuffield Provincial Ho-
review of surgery in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced spital Trust, The Kings Fund Publishing House, 1987.
gynecological and gastrointestinal cancer. The Systematic Re- 8. Eichhorn JH. Prevention of intraoperative anaesthesia acci-
view Steering Committee. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 75: 313-22. dents and related severe injury through safety monitoring. A-
4. Huguier M, Baumel H, Manderscheid JC, Houry S, Fabre JM. naesthesiology 1989; 70: 572-577.
Surgical palliation for unresected cancer of the exocrine pan- 9. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krog-
creas. Eur J Surg Oncol 1993; 19: 342-347. stad D, Murray B, Burke DS, OMalley TA, Goroll AH, Caplan
48 OY

CH, Nolan J, Carabello B, Slater EE. Multifactorial index of LJ. Outcomes of surgery in patients 90 years of age and older.
cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. Engl J Med JAMA 1989; 261: 1909-1915.
1977; 297: 845-850. 17. Manton KG, Vaupel JW. Survival after the age of 80 in the U-
10. Rao TL, Jacobs KH, El-Etr AA. Reinfarction following anae- nites States, Sweden, France, England, and Japan. N Eng J Med
sthesia in patients with myocardial infarction. Anaesthesiology 1995; 333: 1232-1235.
1983; 59: 499-505. 18. Lubitz J, Cai L, Kramarow E, Lentzner H. Health, life expe-
11. Seymour DG, Pringle R. Post-operative complications in the ctancy, and health care spending among the elderly. N Engl J
elderly surgical patient. Gerontology 1983; 29: 262-270. Med 2003; 349: 1048-1055.
12. Ergina PL, Gold SL, Meakins JL. Perioperative care of the 19. de Bree E, Witkamp AJ, Zoetmulder FAN. Intraperitoneal
elderly patient. World J Surg 1993; 17: 192-198. chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2002; 79: 46-
13. Hodgkin JE. Preoperative assessment of respiratory function. 61.
Respir Care 1984; 29: 496. 20. Strander H, Turesson I, Cavallin-Stahl E. A systematic over-
14. Houston MC, Ratcliff DG, Hays JT, Gluck FW. Preoperative view of radiation therapy effects in soft tissue sarcomas. Acta
medical consultation and evaluation of surgical risk. South Med Oncol 2003; 42: 516-531.
J 1987; 80: 1385-1397. 21. Ooi BS, Tjandra JJ, Green MD. Morbidities of adjuvant che-
15. Palmberg S, Hirsjarvi E. Mortality in geriatric surgery. With motherapy and radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: an
special reference to the type of surgery, anaesthesia, compli- overview. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 403-418.
cating diseases, and prophylaxis of thrombosis. Gerontology 22. Sutherland DE, Weitz IC, Liebman HA. Thromboembolic
1979; 25: 103-112. complications of cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagno-
16. Hosking MP, Warner MA, Lobdell EM, Offord KP, Melton sis, and treatment. Am J Hematol 2003; 72: 43-52.

O OO OOOO -
O O -
O O; .
1980 - Birkmeyer et al4
- 19921995 -
- Whipple -
5
... O 4%, 2
, Wennberg1-3, - 16%.
: ... -
) 2,1%. 3 -

37%, 25%.
... , ,
) O ,
, -
.
O . O

,
, -
. -
- .
. X O - -
, -
, . -
- -
. - , .
, -
,
. 49

- , -
- ,
-
. O

(outcomes research)5.
: - , 36
(effectiveness re- . -
search)
(quality assessment).
Hermanek
evidence- & Hermanek11, 2000
based medicine. -
. .

.
12 -
, -
- , -
: . 13. -
-
Fielding 19806 multidisciplinary approach.
19887 McArdle 19918. -

, - . -
, ,
. O -
, , -
, -
700% - , -
. 1997 Holm et al9 , -
- .
, , -
, -
.
, .

, , UICC 1995 -
-
.
, -
,
, :
. 1.
- -
-
- . -
, Heald. 1999
Havenga10 ,

, - -
50 OY

. , :
2. , 1.
-
, .
, - 2.
, -
, ,
. .
3. - 3. O -
. - .
- 4. O
-
.
, 5.

. .
- 6.
,
- .
X O. 7. , , -
-
.
- -
. O (- Bell et al14
) - , -
- 21 16 -
. , - -
,
. 7 . -
2 419 -
, 28% -
. -
. 6 3
- . -
-
, - ,
;
,
, -
. , -
-
- .
. -
- , -
,
-
. ,
30 17% 23% -
- 46% 76%.
, ,
. 51

-
-
- . -

. ,
-
, - .


1. Wennberg JE, Gittelson A. Variations in medical care among LE. Influence of hospital and surgeon related factors on
small areas. Sci Am 1982; 246: 120-34. outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preo-
2. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Culp WJ. Are hospital services perative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 657-663.
rationed in New Haven or overutilized in Boston? Lancet 1982; 10. Havenga K, Enker WE, Norstein J, Mariya Y, Heald RJ, Van
23: 1185-9. Houwelingen HC, Van de Velde CJH. Improved survival and
3. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Shelton RM, Bubolz TA. Hospital local control after total mesorectal excision or D3 lymphade-
use and mortality among medicare beneficiaries in Boston and nectomy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer: An interna-
New Haven. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1168-73. tional analysis of 1411 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25:
4. Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw AL, Finlayson SR, Grove MR, To- 368-374.
steson AN. Relationship between hospital volume and late 11. Hermanek P. Hermanek PJ. Role of Surgeon as a Variable in
survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999; 126: the treatment of Rectal Cancer. Seminars of Surg Oncol 2000;
178-83. 19: 329-335.
5. Porter GA, Skeibber JM. Outcomes research in Surgical On- 12. Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C. In-
cology. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 367-375. fluence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on sur-
6. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G. Ana- vival from breast cancer. Lancet 1955; 345: 1265-70.
stomotic integrity after operations for large bowel cancer: A 13. Sainsbury R, Rider L, Smith A, MacAdam A. Does it matter
multicentre study. BMJ 1980; 281: 411-4. where you live? Treatment variation for breast cancer in
7. Fielding LP. Surgeon-related variability in the outcome of Yorkshire. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 1275-1278.
cancer surgery. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988; 10: 130-2. 14. Bell CMJ, Ma M, Campbell S, Basnett I, Pollock A, Taylor I.
8. McArdle CS, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on Methodological issues in the use of guidelines and audit to im-
postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. prove clinical effectiveness in breast cancer in one United
BMJ 1991; 302: 1501-5. Kingdom health region. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000; 26: 130-136.
9. Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist

O OOO ) O
O
- .

- O
. . -
, . -
O
, , -
. O
,

) . .
) - O
- ,
.
) , .
52 OY


, ,

.
-
, - , -
... ,
,

- , -
. , , -
- , -
, - , ,
, -
- ,
.
- .
O- ,
. -
5,
- 6, -
, , ,


, - -
, .. .
, -
-
(- ,

), - -
.
1-3. - -

, - , ,
2,1
16% 3 2537%. , .
- , -
, ,
, - .
..4.
,

, - .
, -
O-
, ,
-

. .
-
. 53

O , ,
. .
-


1. Wennberg JE, Gittelson A. Variations in medical care among radiotherapy. Br J Surg 1997, 84: 657-663.
small areas. Sci Am 1982; 246: 120-34. 5. Havenga K, Enker WE, Norstein J, Moriya Y, Heald RJ, van
2. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Culp WJ. Are hospital services ra- Houwelingen HC, van de Velde CJH. Improved survival and
tioned in New Haven or overutilized in Boston? Lancet 1982; local control after total mesorectal excision or D3 lymphadene-
23: 1185-9. ctomy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer: an internatio-
3. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Shelton RM, Bubolz TA. Hospital nal analysis of 1411 patients. Eu J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 368-
use and mortality among medicare beneficiaries in Boston and 374.
New Haven. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1168-73. 6. Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C. In-
4. Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvis LE. fluence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on sur-
Influence of hospital and surgeon related factors on outcome vival from breast cancer. Lancet 1995; 345: 1265-1270.
after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative

OO O -
O OOOO
O ,
- , , -
, , , -
. O- , , -
- -
- , -
, -
,
, , ,
multidiscipli-
, , -
nary care multimodality treatment.
, .


, ,
-
-
,

-
,
- , -
.
- .
-
, , - 1. O -
- . -
. -
- . -
, - .
, , - . -
-
- . -
-
. O - .
, , . .
, , - , -
, , . -
54 OY

. - -
- 1995
. Calman-Hine. British Breast
. , - Group
- .
.
, (Breast Cancer Guidelines), -
, -
2. - (The Improving Outcomes Guidance). 1997
- 10.000.000

. - -
. - 2000
National Cancer Plan,
. - .
- , -
.
-
, - -
. - 4. -
. -

, - :
-
,
-
()
3.
,
, .
,
.
National , , ,
Cancer Institute -
American Cancer Society

. O.


1. Lee CZ, et al. Comprehensive breast centers: Priorities and KR, Zieber N, Glick JH, Solin LJ. he Impact of A Multidisci-
pitfalls. Breast J 1999; vol 5: 319-324. plinary Breast Cancer Center on Recommendations for Patient
2. Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C, Dawson J, Scully J, West W, Management. Cancer 2001; 91: 1231-716.
Sainsbury E. Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution 4. Fukuhi SG, Offutt LA, Sacks J, Mann BD. Teaching a multidi-
new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effe- sciplinary approach to cancer treatment during surgical clerk-
ctiveness. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 15-22. ship via an interactive board game. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 337-
3. Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, Fraker DL, Czerniecki BJ, 340.
Rosato EF, Lawton T, Conant EF, Orel SG, Schuchter L, Fox

. . , .

O - -
O O 4560 Gy -
4.
) . , -
() -
-
20
-
.
-
200.000 -
, .. -

5 5 Gy5.
. 2/3 -
) (). O -
-
- -
() -
6:
/ . - . O -
, / - , -
, 40% 1-3. .
: -
) . -
. - .
: Hodgkin,
, Hodgins , , -
6570 Gy . - , .
1,82 Gy ( . O -
, fractionation)
(hyperfractionation) . -
, , - - ,
. -
. -, -
) . -
- (1+1 = 2) (1+1 > 2). O
( 1520%) / - -
. : .
, , -,
- , , (--)
- ...
-- --
, - ,
, -
( -
) . -
/ -
( ). O -

55
56 OY

( Nigro)
1. -

..
) . -
. / -
:

, -
O
, -
, -
, ,
..,
. -
. -
-

-
(. 1).

Hodgkin -
: 10 3 Gy, 5 4 Gy,
2 8,5 Gy, 1 10 Gy .. ( ,
. hypofractionation). -


-

, 9.

O O I
-
-
-
. -
, -
-
. - :
-, - . -
, .
, -
7,8, , :

/
=
. / .

- .
. -
, , -
- -
, -
, - . -
. (. 1).
- -
. - :
, ) .
, - ) .
- ,
. 57

-60

1 .

( ).


-60


-59 . -

.
0,5
-60

(1)

(2)
1,17 1,33 eV. -

5,26 ,

,
D , 3,5 . -
1. - : N = N0 e-t ,
(1) - , -
. (2) - t
. = N0/2, t = T= 1n2/. O -
( . .
, University Studio Press, 2000, . 17, . 1.1). .

)
, 4
, 25 MV ( ).
.. -
) . - (325 MeV). -
- -
- , -
, -
. , -
-
OO O (. 2). -
H OO I -
- (multileaf colli-
. O mators),
: -
(. 3). -
) (3D-conformal ra-
diation therapy)
, 40400 KV (). ,
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).
.

) (-60, -
-137)

, 0,66 MV (),
1,33 MV (). ,
, 30
, -
-
. -
, -
-
. E 2. O .
58 OY

3. O (multileaf collimator E 5.
MLC). . . -
, 60C, -
. - .
- -
, - .
. (set-up
margin ICRU).

, -
..). -
-

-
(. 5).
-
,
.
-
(virtual simulation) -
(CT-si-
4. O () mulator), -
(,
) . O -
-
. .
-
O . .
, -
. O
- -
. - .
( -, -
..) - (.. , ,
(. 4). - , ). -
-
, - -
, . (, , ..). -

- -
( , - . -
. 59

-137, -192, 6,10.


-98 .. - -
(High Dose Rate HDR) - . -
-192. HDR . -

( 810 23 ,
) . O -
().
,
(. ). :

OI OA
H2O e-(.) + OH + H + H2 + H2O2
- O O -
, - , -
(.. - 100 ngstrom. RH (..
), , - DNA) ,
, - :
. - RH + OH R + H2O,

R, -
, ,
-
(
-
) .
.
. -
-
-131,

, -89 -
HO2, H2O2.

O HO2 ,
..

OO O
H2O2.
To O2 :
O OOI
R + O2 RO2
-
RO2+ RH (DNA) RO2H + R
-
. H RO2
1 Gray (Gy) ROOH,
1 Joule 1 kg, () .

1 Gy = 1 Joule / kg -
Gy cGy (rad) (1 Gy = 100 -
cGy). . 3 -
,
(--
cGy, 5.0007.000. ) -
150300 cGy, 57 - .
-
.
, :
A OOI Y (h)
- RH RH+
- RH+ R + H+
-
Compton - -
60 OY

.
DNA 5 RNA, 700 D/3 D/3 D/3
, 7.000 1.200.000
. 85% - D

15%
.


Y OOE A

10:
) .
) -
.
O

. O -
(interphase death) 6. -
, 3 x D/3 (=D)
.
-
( ) - 1 x D ( . . -
. , University Studio Press, 2000, . 98, . 5.9).
)
(sublethal damage). - -
.
, .
- , -
- (). -
. - -
- (hyperfractio-
(, shoulder). O nated).
- ) .
, -
, - , -
. - ,
(-
) , . -
, - (lethal damage)
( - -
) , , -
. .
(. 6). 50 ,
- 56 (25=32, 26=64).
, RNA
, - DNA,
, - RNA
- ,
. . -
(isoeffective doses). -
- .

. - , -
- .
. 61

- ..., . O -
, , -
.
- (cell cycle time Tc). [.:
( ) - -
. H - (clonogens).
Bergonie-Tribondeau. -
-
- ].
.
O OO BERGONIE-TRIBONDEAU
-
. O -
1906 ,

, -
(volume doubling time Td) , ,
, , , -
1 2 10
11.
20 ...
-

Bergonie-Tri-
bondeau: , . -
- 150 m
. - ,
-
(. 7). -
. -
(radiosensitive), - -
(radiocurable). - (tumor angiogenesis
. factor TAF).
-
, - . -
. 300 m,
.
O 2,53 -
O , -
O (. -
. -
, ).

<70
7.
. -
.
().
12
70
2,53 -
-
, . -
.



62 OY

4R OO- ,
.
-
. -
-
. -
.
4. (Repopulation). O -
4R . 4R -
- . -
10:
1. (Repair). -
. - , -
- -
- 13.
. - -
( (accelerated
, . ) radiation therapy).

. -
2. (Reoxygenation). - ,
- . -
. R -
- (, Radiosensitivity).
,
-
. -
, - -
,
. - . -
- ,
( , , . O
-, - ..), ( -
12. , ),
3. (Redistri- .
bution). ( , ,
) - -
. . -
(..
(> 5 Gy). ) ,
(), G2 .
G1/S, S. ()
To - TD5/5 (Tolerance Dose), 5
-
. M 5%
- . TD50/5
, - 5
G2. - 50%
- .
. O
- 2. O : )
. 63

2.

- / TD5/5 TD50/5
2001.000 cGy
210
12
610
1.0002.000 cGy
612
(stem) O 1520
2.0003.000 cGy
: . 2328
: , 2030
3.0004.000 cGy
: 3540
2535
4.0005.000 cGy
, 4350
5.0006.000 cGy
5055
5060
6.0007.000 cGy
6070
O 6575
O 6575

, ) 200 cGy10% , -
5 , ) 68 - . -
) . -

OO ( ) / -
OO .
-
: , . -
- , -
. O ,
, , , Hodgkin ..
- O
(. ). .
O. - . 2
2 -
. ( , .
, , , ..) - , .. ,
, , .. O
. - ,
, , - , -
. - / ,
, ( ..
). .
-
. -.
O -
2 . ,
64 OY

3. RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group)

Grade
0 1 2 3 4
, , , ,

..

O <1h, ,
- ( 1 ) , , ,

. -
4. -


.
(, -
, )
( ,
, -
)
. (, , )
O -
, , - ,
-
( )
()
. , , : ()
(, , , -
, ), -
(, ), -
( ), (- .
), (), - (
(, ),
, , , ), -
( ). -
- . O --
, - ,
( - ,
, , ) .. .
-
-
( ) - actuarial.
. -
14.
H A OO-
:
O . . ..
3 .
. . -
( ) - -
. . .. FEV1
5 . -
. 65

. -
. - . -
(. 3). - , .. -
- -
.. -
4. -
,
O O (repopulation).
(DOSE FRACTIONATION) -
YO (HYPERFRACTIONATION) , , -
,

CHART (Continous Hyperfractionated Accelerated Ra-
-
diation Therapy)16.
1,82 Gy 5 .
. (continuous), -
-
12 .

, -
() 180200 cGy.
. -
110130 cGy, 10
(hyperfractionated), 3 -
15% ,
(8 .., 2 .., 8 ..) 1,41,5 Gy
. . O 6 , -
.
6 , , (accelerated),
- 50,4 Gy 12 . O
. (: , -
- ) ,
, - 12 -
- .
. - -
, ..,
ORTC ( 57 -
(European Organization of Radiation Therapy and Che- ). -
motherapy)15. 356 -
( - 17-19.
) 12, 01, 0,
1980 1987. - OO (HYPOFRACTIONATION)
35 2 Gy = 70 Gy
7 , - 2,5
80,5 Gy 70 7 Gy. --
(2 1,15 ). 5- ,
- , -
59% 40% (p = 0,02), - , .. 10 3 Gy, 5 4 Gy, 1
(74% 42%) 8 Gy ..
(Karnofsky 90100). ,
,
OO O .
(ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION) Christie Hospital Manchester . -
- ,
- ,
23 . O .
, ,
. -
66 OY

, ..
3,33 Gy ,
5 , -
50 Gy. O
16 3,13 Gy
70 Gy 35 -
.

. -
-

( 8. .
/), (box-technique). O
(fractionation sensitivity)20-22.
( 100%), -
- .
% .
- 70 Gy,
IMRT. 90% () 63 Gy.

O
O
, -
, -

TV
,

CTV
.
GTV
, -
. O
International Commis-
sion on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) PT V

, ICRU50 1993 ICRU


62 199923,24. (Volumes) -
E 9. O ,
. -
ICRU (. ).
,
( -
..) (. 8).
)
(Volumes) (. 9):
.
,
i.
-
:
( -
), - Gross Tumor Volume (GTV)
(Radiation Treatment Planning RTP). M - ,
-
,
. , , -
- , , ..
( -
). , .. .
GTV -
% , -
(.. 90% , 30% - .
. 67

Clinical Target Volume (CTV) iii. :


GTV Treated Volume (TV)
() . GTV - E
, CTV , ,
. O CTV (prescribed)
- .
,
, Irradiated Volume (IV)
, E
- .
.. O -
- - (1D, Dimensional) -
. - , ..
CTV, .. - .
(CTVI) (CTVII).
(CTVI) 50 Gy, (2D), ..
(CTVII) 60 , -
Gy ... . ,
(3D),
ii. (3D-con-
: formal radiation therapy 3D-CRT). -
Planning Target Volume (PTV) -
O , - ..
, , ,
(clonogens) (maximum), (minimum),
CTV. (mean), (median) (mo-
CTV dal) . O CRU
. (reference point), -
CTV ,
, - (. 8).
. -
.. - O O
, - / -
( - (3D-
), ( CRT). -
), ( ..). -
Internal Margin (IM). -
- (contouring) ,
(set-up) - . -
- -
. Set-up Margin 3D-CRT.
(SM). PTV o- O
: PTV = CTV + IM + SM. -
( , -
Organs At Risk (OAR) ..). -
- -
- .
/ , .. -
, .. . O
,
68 OY

.
CT-topogram
, -
. , -
210 mm -
. O -
(Treatment Planning Sy-
stem TPS) /
(virtual simulation). O -
-
CTV (. ICRU-50 62)
.
TPSs
() ..

DRR (Digitally Reconstructed Radio-
graph). DRR
10. DRR -
(. 10).
. - DRR , TPSs,
/ por-
tal imaging portal film, -
, - . -
.

11. (virtual simulation)


. .
, DRR,
( OO 2.0).
. 69

1,0

0,9
PTV CTV
0,8

0,7

0,6

0,5

0,4

0,3
0,2

0,1

0,0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

12. (cumulative) (DVH) o.


. 70% CTV 50 Gy,
10% 20 Gy, 8% 10 Gy ...

-
( , -
) Beams Eye View
(BEV) (. 11). A

-
. , -
TPS
-

. -
,
/ (wedge filters) E 13. O blocks
- .
.. -
(trial and error). -
(Multileaf Collimator MLC),
, blocks,

- (Dose Volume Histogram DVH). / -
DVH (. 3).
( ) - -
. -
. , .
(differential) DVH (cumulative) DVH. ( ) -
(. 12). (portal i-
maging), . -
block, ,
blocks, - (portal film). O -
blocks ,
-
(. 13). - . ,
70 OY

2.
. (set-up)
.
3. T
- (dose escalation trials),
57 . -
- .
12
, , O OO-
. - (IMRT)
(, , - E Intensity Modulated Radiation
) . Therapy (IMRT). -
. -
O
O O ,
. -
3D-CRT , , - IMRT -
, , - .
-1,2. , -
: .
1. - - -
- (. , MLC)

. -

E 14. RT .. ,
, . -
.. . . O -
45 Gy, 60-70 Gy.
. 71

25.
, - -
. - . , 1 Joule
1 m2 1 sec,
. O 1 watt/m2 (1 watt = 1 joule/sec). H
-
. - = 0 e-, 0
, -
IMRT .
(. 14). -
[: - .]


1. Leibel SA, Phillips TL, eds. Textbook of Radiation Oncology. 14. Bentzen SM. Quantitative Clinical Radiobiology. Acta Oncol
Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1999. 1993; 32: 259-275.
2. Perez CA, Brady LW, eds. Principles and Practice of Radia- 15. Horiot JC, Le Fur R, et al. Hyperfractionation versus conven-
tion Oncology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co, 2000. tional fractionation in oropharyngeal carcinoma: final analysis
3. Casciato DA, Lowitz BB. Manual of Clinical Oncology. 3rd of a randomized trial of the EORTC cooperative group of ra-
ed. A Little Brown Spiral Manual, 1995. diotherapy. Radiother Oncol 1992; 25: 231-241.
4. Fletcher GH. Basic clinical parameters. In: Fletcher GH, ed. 16. Dische S, Saunders M, Barrett A, et al. A randomized multi-
Textbook of Radiotherapy. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febinger, center trial of CHART vs conventional radiotherapy in head
1980; 180-219. and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 1997; 44: 123-126.
5. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Improved survival with pre-ope- 17. Fu KK, Pajak TF, Trotti A, et al. A Radiation Therapy Onco-
rative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. New Eng J logy Group (RTOG) phase III randomised study to compare
Med 1997; 336: 980-987. hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractiona-
6. A. . tion to standard fractionation therapy for head and neck squa-
. - mous cell carcinomas: first report of RTOG 9003. Int Jour Ra-
: University Studio Prress, 2000. diat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 48: 7-16.
7. Jeremic B, Shibamoto Y, Milicic B, et al. Hyperfractionated 18. Ang KK. Accelerated fractionation: what is the price for
radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily speeding? Radiother Oncol 1997; 44: 97-99.
cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the 19. Horiot JC, Bontemps P, van den Bogaert W, et al. Accelerated
head and neck: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol fractionation (AF) compared to conventional fractionation
2000; 18: 1458-1464. (CF) improves locoregional control in the radiotherapy of ad-
8. Fountzilas G, Ciuleanou E, Theofanopoulou M, et al. A ran- vanced head and neck cancers: results of the EORTC 22851
domised study of concomitant radiotherapy with cisplatin or randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 1997; 44: 111-121.
carboplatin versus radiotherapy alone in patients with locally 20. Yeoh EEK, Fraser RJ, Mc Gowan RE, et al. Evidence for effi-
advanced non-nasopharyngeal head and neck cancer. A Helle- cacy without increased toxicity of hypofractionated radiothera-
nic Cooperative Oncology Group (HECOG) phase III study. py for prostate carcinoma: early results of a phase III rando-
(Abstract) J Clin Oncol 1991; 22 Suppl. 1: 2003. mized trial. I. J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55: 4.
9. Plataniotis GA, Kouvaris JR, Dardoufas C, Kouloulias V, 21. Fowler JF, Ritter MA, Chappel RJ, Brenner DJ. What hypo-
heofanopoulou MA, Vlahos L. A short radiotherapy course fractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer?
for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ef- Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56 (4): 1093-1104.
fective palliation and patients convenience. Lung Cancer 2002; 22. Brenner DJ. Hypofractionation for prostate cancer radiothe-
35: 203-207. rapy what are the issues? (Editorial). Int J Radiation Oncol
10. Nias EJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 5th ed. Philadel- Biol Phys 2003; 57: 912-914.
phia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000. 23. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measure-
11. Steel GG, ed. Basic Clinical Radiobiology. 3rd ed. Arnold Pu- ments ICRU Report 50. Prescribing, recording and reporting
blishers, 2002. photon beam therapy. Bethesda, MD: ICRU, 1993.
12. Van den Bogaert W, van der Schueren E, Horiot JC, et al. The 24. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measure-
EORTC randomised trial on three fractions per day and miso- ments ICRU Report 62. (Supplement to ICRU Report 50)
nidazol in advanced head and neck cancer: prognostic factors. Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy.
Radiother Oncol 1995; 35: 100-106. Bethesda, MD: ICRU, 1999.
13. Withers HR, Taylor JMG, Maciejewski B. The hazard of acce- 25. Chao KS, Low DA, Perez CA, Purdy JA. Intensity-modulated
lerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: The Mallinckrodt
Acta Oncol 1988; 27: 131-146. experience. Int J Cancer 2000; 90: 92-103.
: ,

. , . , . , .

OI OH
OOI . O
.

-
/ . :
, :
.
. =+
, , .. O :
oo , .. 12 C.
. 6
,

, -
(.. ). -
-
OH O OO ( Antoine Henri
, Bequerel, 1896, ). -

(
(). - ) -
. O ,
, -
, -
,
-
, -
():
. -
-

( , ). .
O , ,
-
(K, L, M, N ..). .
m = 9 10-30 kg -
q = -1,6 10-19 Coulomb. O
- -
, : .
(p) (n). - -


1.800
(42He), , 42,
. -
(, )
( )
:
.
- (, ) ( 4, 2) + 42
- -
. O ( ).

73
74 OY

-- e+, -
. , +, -
, - , -
() (4), , .
(2) . +- -
- -19: 19 10 Ne 199F + +.
-226: 226 88 Ra 222 86Rn + 4 2. (Electron Capture EC)
- +- -
- (EC)
- (- L- ) .
. -
:
, . - p + e n + v
-
. . -
:
n p + e + v 1,
+-:

1, - (, ) + e ( 1, ) + v
-
:
(, ) ( + 1, ) + e + v -
.
- -
, - , -
. -
- , ..
- -, L-. -
. (
. -
-
160
( -). 150
- - 140
-60: 6027 Co 60 28 Ni + 130
-131: 131 131 Xe + . 120
54 54
110 -
+- 100
-
- 90
80
. 70
: 60
50
pn+e+v 40

30 =
20 + EC-
1, -
10
-
: 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

(, ) (Z 1, A) + e+ + v
1.
4 -
, . .
. 75

) . -
. - ,
-125:
125 + EC 125 52Te + 28 keV - (I, isomeric transition). O -
53
m (metastable). -
O
-
4 -
Cs-137.
-
1. (Internal Conversion IC)

OOI
( ) -
-
-
(- -) ,
,
. -

,
( )
-
, . -
, (conversion electrons) ,
. -,
- ( ).
. OO A
(, , -
), - O -
. dN dt, -
:
10-15s - dN / dt =

1. -

* - - (MeV)
3H 0,02 12,32
14C 0,2 5730 .
32P 1,7 14,28 d ,
51Cr EC 0,32 27,7 d
57Co EC 0,122 + 0,136 270 d
59Fe 1,6 45,1 d
1,099 + 1,292
60Co 1,5 5,27 .
1,173 + 1,332
81Rb + 1,1 4,58 h
0,446
99mTc 0,141 6,0 h
123 EC 0,159 13,2 h
125 EC 0,035 60,14 d ,
131 0,8 8,02 d ,
0,364
137Cs 1,2 30,17 .
0,662
192Ir 0,7 74,02 d
0,317 + 0,468 + ...
198Au 1,4 2,69 d ,
0,412
201T1 EC 0,167 + 0,135 3,05 d
76 OY

O .
. - , , , -
,
: , -
dN / N = dt .
Rntgen
: . Rntgen -
N(t) = N(t0) e-(t-t0) :
- ) Rntgen-Bremsstrahlung .
- ) Rntgen.
t, N(t), -
Rntgen-remsstrahlung
N (t0) ()
t0. - Rntgen-Bremsstrahlung -
-
, . ( Coulomb) . -
, - -
- Bremsstrahlung (
). Rntgen-Brems-
. = 1n2/.
strahlung , ,

, -
, = 1/. O 1
.

- Rntgen
.

.
-
dN / dt -
() -
(
. )
Bequerel
(Bq): 1 Bq = 1 s. -
e-
Bq:
N
1 Kilobequerel (kBq) = 103 Bq M
1 Megabequerel (MBq) = 106 Bq L

1 Gigabequerel (GBq) = 109 Bq
e- +Zqe
Bq -
Curie (Ci): 1 Ci = 3,7 1010
Bq (= 37 GBq). A e-

OOI RNTGEN
Rntgen Wilchelm N
M
Conrad Rntgen 8 1895
Wuerzburg ,
, -
. -
(
). , - B
-
2. Rntgen.
keV Rntgen- . -
GeV. . ()
.
. 77

. (-
. , ) dV -
- , dm
( ) dV, dm = dV, :
K = dEk /dm
.
,
-
KERMA , KERMA .. KER-

MA SI Joule
.
Gray (Gy): 1 Gy = 1 J/kg.

KERMA
.
KERMA KERMA
Rntgen. -
:
-
, K = dK/dt = dEk /dm dt
, - KERMA SI Watt
, (W/kg = Gy/s). -
Gy/min, Gy/h
(cGy/min, cGy/h).
.
Rntgen D
(. 2). ( )

A OA E

D :

, , D = dE/dm,
. dE -
J dV,
dm
J :
dV, dm = dV, . -
J = dQ / dma , SI ,
dQ KERMA, Gray (Gy). -
( ) ,
dV , dma - KERMA, rad (Radiation Absorbed Dose): 1 rad
dV. = 0,01 Gy.
SI Coulomb
(C/kg). D
( )
Rntgen (R): 1 R = 2,58 104 C/kg. D

:
- D = dD/dt = dE/dm dt
:
J = dJ/dt = dQ/dma dt SI , KERMA, Gray/sec.
Gy/min, Gy/h
SI
(cGy/min, cGy/h).
Amper (A/kg). -
Rntgen per second (R/s) Rnt-
E I
gen per minute (R/min) Rntgen per hour (R/h).
H I OH
KERMA (Kinetic Energy Released in Material) O
KERMA () -
dEk . ,
78 OY

2,0

1,5

1,0

0,5
4 MV
6 MV
10 MV
192
0,0 Ir
0 1 2 3 4 5
(cm)

3. -192 .

OO I H ()
, 1 . - ,
,
. O
(Planning Target Volume TV). -226 1.620 ,
TV -222 84 .
- -
. -
, (. -192 ( = 74 )
3). -137 ( = 30 ) -
PTV , -125 ( = 60 )
( - (. 2).
).

1896 .. Becquerel -
1. - - -

1903. . ,
-226 Pierre
Marie Curie2,3 1898. - PTV. -
-
, 2.
.


E NOBOIA

16 (-226, -
I-125 (0,30,6 mCi) 60 d 28 keV
-222, -60, -137, -198, -
Pd-l03 17 d 2025 keV
-182, -192, -125, -103, - Au-198 2,7 d 412 keV
90, -106, -241, -145, -
169, -252, -75) - Ir-192 74,2 d 320 keV
, I-125 (520 mCi) 60 d 28 keV
. O - Co-60 5,3 y 1,171,33 MeV
Ra-226 1.620 y 0,182,2 MeV
-
Cs-137 30 y 662 keV
.
. 79

, - -226
- -,
. - , -226
- -226
0,18 2,2 MeV. .
-137 0,66 MeV
-192 0,37 MeV. - (afterloading) . -
-137 -192
-226 - (),
.

O . -226
Becquerel - 1.000 Rntgen
(SI) . -
. 7.000 Rnt-
Curie gen -
3,7 1010 (1 Curie = 3,7 . -
1010 Becquerel). - -
, - .
- 1980 -
. , -
-192, (Rntgen, rad, Gy). O
(.. mg
3,5 mm 0,6 mm ) / (mgE/h), 1 mg -
. 1 mCi. O
.
OOI 2 4 cm 0,2
- 0,3 mm. O -
- -
- -. -- .
.
0,5 2 ,
mm. . -
-
-106 . -
-106 -106 , -
-106. -
39,4 keV 2,07 3,63 MeV. . -
- , , ,
-106, (pre-
-. - loaded radium techniques), -
-106 (applicator), -
100 Gy . .

-90 -60
-90 -90, -60 -60, -
- 2,28 MeV. 5.272 . -, -
-90 , , (1,17 MeV 1,33 MeV), -
- -
, ,
. . -
80 OY

, - -
, . (conformal) .
-192
-137 -
O -137 . -
30 . -137 -- -192
0,66 MeV, .
-226. -226
-137 - ,
, - , -
. - ,
-137 - .
.
-192 O O
. O
. O
-125 -
-125 60 - . O
- 35 keV. - .
(seeds) - -

. - :
. ) ,
) ,
-103 ) (, , ),
-103 17 -
.
2025 keV. - ICRU-Report 38 19857 -
-125. - ,
- [Low-Dose-Rate (LDR), Medium-Dose-Rate (MDR)
, High-Dose-Rate (HDR), ]:
.
-103 LDR: 0,42 Gy/h
-125 - MDR: 212 Gy/h
, HDR: 12 Gy/h.
, -
. -
-
. . -
(fractionated), -
-192 , -
- . -
-192. LDR MDR ,
74 -192 - 37 28 .
- 320 keV. - -
(. ,
afterloading): LDR- HDR- (isoeffective do-
- se), , -
, . O .
-
-
. 81

. -
(. )
- .
(Man- -
chester System, Paris System, Offenbach System) -
. , ,
.

. (Intraoperative radio-
(.. LQ-model) therapy IORT)5,9,10,
(isoeffective dose), 4.
.
, -
. . -

LDR- HDR- (.
. 4). -
LDR-. ,
, .
PDR- (Pulse Dose Rate),
-
24 - (ovoids). O
1 Gy . (
- ) ovoids
, - .

. . :
- Manchester ICRU.
LDR- HDR- - Manchester (
Orton8. )
LDR- . 2 cm -
HDR- . 2 cm () -
LDR 0,85 Gy/h - . 3 cm
78 . HDR 4 . Manchester
6 7,5 Gy. -
HDR -
-
.
LDR- HDR- -
.

EOO I
-
() -
() .
,
,
.
2.
4. O
1 cm ( , superficial contact therapy) - .
82 OY

PTV.
3.
(HDR)
-
-
.
Manchester
(HDR)
ICRU PTV

.
B

-
11 ,
.
- . -
, - -
stents. ,
. -
. .
PTV - -
. O -
. O -
-
-182 - , -
-192. . O
- , -
. ,
.
, -
-192. - .
(dwell positions) - O
(stepping source system). 1970
- 1980 LDR, Sele-
(dwell time ctron LDR Curietron. -
position). 137 , pellets. O
, (HDR) -
- -60,
. - -192 (. 3).
-
-
, , -
(seeds) -
. -
(Seed Selectron) -

.
, -
PTV. I O O
OO


(prescription) , -
. (optimization)
1904, - (registration)
1970
. . -
6 -
. 83

- ,
- PTV.
(organs at risk) -
, PTV. . O
-
: .
1. . -
2. . -
3. .
4. . -
- .
-
(DR). To -192 (CT,
- MR, US).
.
H H O
-
, -
-
(Treatment Planning System).
II. -
15,17,31,32,49. -
O .
. - 0,5 cm
-
- 21,24,52,54. HDR- PDR--

DVHs (Dose Volu- -


me Histograms). O -
- .
FLABs -
. III. -
FLABs
-
16,17,31: (FLAB:
.
. O ,
- ,
- , 5-6).

5. FLAB (). 6. FLAB .


84 OY

O -
O
- , -
PTV15. - LDR-.
-
(Catheter Oriented Sy-
1 cm 0,5 cm . stems) -
, - (LDR-).
- Manchester System42,46 -
. PTV. O -
/ -
15,23,27,28,30,32,50. , PTV
- +/ 10%
- . Quimby System48 ,
. Manchester System, -
- ,
Manchester System, . -
ICRU-3830, - ,
- -
26,37,41,49,50. . Paris System18
-

PTV.
- ,
: .
1. --
22,30,31,37,50 -
(Projectional Recostruction Method PRM). .
Paris System LDR-
, -
, -
(X-ray catheters). .
2. - (Manchester System Quimby Sy-
(.. - stem), Paris System -
clips - , -
). - .
3. -
-. , -
4. :
, - 1.
. .
5. 2. -
, - PTV.
() 3. -
(%) .
6. -
( film -
). --
1970 1980 (- .
LDR-) 4.
, - .
. 5.
. 85

(fractionated) .
:
. 1. .
2. .
- 3. .
, - -
, . - -
( ).
-
40,41,47,53. ,
25,29,33- (CT-guided implan-
36,40,41,45,47,53,55,49 tation).

,

.
-
. -
, , -
(. 7). templa-
- tes (. 8, 9), -
, . -

(CT-, MR- US-guided brachytherapy).
-
-
: -
,
.
-
. -
,

V.
0,52,0 cm -
.

.
() -

-
( plexiglas,
-
template). -
-

2 -
.
7.
. -
. O . E:
. : -
- .
86 OY

-
CT template
, template
-

.
CT templates22-24
.

-
. -
Template-Technique

-
-
.
. -
, -



CT PTV.
8.
template. template. templates -

9. , . )
. ) , PTV (organs
at risk) CT. ) () .
) ().
. 87

10. . :
. : , .

- ,
. -
.

-
-
, -
- (. 10).
. -

1. Becquerel H. Emission de radiations nouvelles par luranium 10. Tonus C, Kolotas C, Appel P, et al. Colorectales Carcinom -
metallique. Paris: Comptes rendus Acad. des Sciences, 1896; Behandlungsalter- native durch intraoperative Radiotherapie
122: 420. mittels Afterloading-flab- Technik? Chirurg 1999; 70: 43-48.
2. Busch M, Sauerwein W. Klinischmethodische Grundlagen der 11. Waksman R, King SB, Crocker IR, et al (Hrsg). Vascular Bra-
Brachytherapie. In: Scherer E, Sack H, Hrsg. Strahlenthera- chytherapy. Nucletron B. Veenendaal, 1996.
pie: Radiologische Onkologie. 4te Auflage. Springer Verlag, 12. Anderson LL. A natural volume-dose histogram for brachy-
1996: 81-108. therapy. Med Phys 1986; 13: 898-903.
3. Curie P, Curie M, BBmont G. Sur une substance nouvelle ra- 13. Anderson LL. Dose specification and quantification of im-
dioactive, con tenuc dans la pechblende. Paris: Comptes ren- plant quality. In: Williamson IE, Thomadsen BR, Nath R, eds.
dus Acad. des Sciences, 1898; 127: 1215. Brachytherapy Physics. Madison: American Medical Physics,
4. Fritz P, Hensley FW, Bems C, et al. First experience with su- 1995: 343-360.
prafractionated skin irradiations using large afterloading molds. 14. Ash D, Flynn A, Battermann I, et al. ESTRO/EAU/EORTC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 36(1): 147-157. recommendations on permanent seed implantation for loca-
5. Harrison LB, Minsky BD, Enker WE, et al. High dose rate in- lized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2000; 57: 315-321.
traoperative radiation therapy (HDRIORT) as part of the ma- 15. Baltas D, Kolotas C, Geramani K, et al. A Conformal Index
nagement strategy for locally advanced primary and recurrent (COIN) to Evaluate Implant Quality and Dose Specification
rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42(2): 325. in Brachytherapy. Int I Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 40(2):
6. Henschke UK, Hilaris BS, Mahan GD. Afterloading in inter- 515-524.
stitial and intracavitary radiation therapy. Am J Roentgenol 16. Baltas D, Kneschaurek P, Krieger H. Leitlinien in der Radio-
1963; 90: 386-395. onkologie P3 und DGMP Bericht Nr. 14: Dosisspezifikation in
7. International Comission on Radiation Units & Measurements. der HDR Brachytherapie, 1999.
ICRU Report 38, Dose and volume specification for reporting 17. DIN 6827-3: Protokollierung bei der medizinischen Anwen-
intracavitary therapy in gynaecology. Bethesda: ICRU, 1985. dung ionisierender Strahlen, Brachytherapie mit umschlosse-
8. Orton CG. High dose rate versus low dose rate brachytherapy nen Strahlungsquellen, Entwurf 1999.
to gynaecological cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 1993; 3: 232-239. 18. Dutreix A, Marinello G. The Paris System. In: Pierquin B,
9. Strassmann G, Walter S, Kolotas C, et al. Reconstruction and Wilson IF, Chassagne D, eds. Modern Brachytherapy. New
navigation system for intraoperative brachytherapy using the York: Masson Publishing, 1987: 25-42.
flab technique tot colorectal tumor bed irradiation. Int J Ra- 19. Edmundson GK. Geometry based optimization for stepping
diat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47: 1323-1329. source implants. In: Martinez AA, Orton CG, Mould R, eds.
88 OY

Brachytherapy HDR and LDR. Columbia, 1993. Brachytherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 1999; 175: 419-27.
20. Edmundson GK. Volume optimization: an American view- 36. Kovacs G. Conformal treatment planning using Magnetic Re-
point. In: Mould RF, Battermann II, Martinez AA, Speiser sonance Imaging tot interstitial implants. In: Zamboglou N,
BL, eds. Brachytherapy from radium to optimisation. Veenen- ed. New developments in interstitial remote controlled brachy-
daal: Nucletron International B. V, 1994: 314-318. therapy. Mnchen: W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 1997: 52-59.
21. Fritz P, Hensley FW, Berns C, et al. First experience with su- 37. Kubo H. Use of oblique simulation films for estimating the
prafractionated skin irradiations using large afterloading molds. maximum dose to the bladder and rectum in obese brachythe-
Int I Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 36(1): 147-157. rapy patients. Med Phys 1995; 22: 441-442.
22. Giannouli S, Baltas D, Milickovic N, et al. Autoactivation of 38. Lahanas M, Baltas D, Zamboglou N. Anatomy-based three-di-
source dwell positions for HDR brachytherapy treatment plan- mensional dose optimization in brachytherapy using multi-ob-
ning. Med Phys 2000; 27(11): 2517-2520. jective genetic algorithms. Med Phys 1999; 26: 1904-1918.
23. Grigsby P, Georgiou A, Williamson I, et al. Anatomy variation 39. Lahanas M, Baltas D, Zamboglou N. A hybrid evolutionary al-
of gynecologic brachytherapy prescription points. Int I Radiat gorithm for multi-objective anatomy-based dose optimization
Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 27: 725-729. in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Phys Med Bio 2003; 148: 399-
24. Harrison LB, Minsky BD, Enker WE, et al. High dose rate in- 415.
traoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT) as part of the 40. Levendag P, Peiffert D, Jansen P, et al. Rotterdam approach
management strategy for locally advanced primary and recur- to future prospects for improvements in HDR brachytherapy
rent rectal cancer. Int I Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42(2): of the tonsil. In: Zamboglou N, ed. New developments in inter-
325. stitial remote controlled brachytherapy. Mnchen: W. Zucksch-
25. Hebbinghaus D, Kovacs G, Kohr P, et al. The Kiel conformal werdt Verlag, 1997: 128-134.
HDR/PDR interstitial brachytherapy planning system incor- 41. Ling C, Schell M, Working K, et al. CT-assisted assessment of
porating cross-sectional digital imaging. Endocur/Hyperther bladder and rectum dose in gynecological implants. Int J Ra-
Oncol 1996; 12: 81-86. diat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13: 1577-1582.
26. Herbolsheimer M, Baier K, Gall P, et al. Ferngesteuerte in- 42. Meredith WJ, ed. Radium dosage the Manchester system. 2nd
trauterine Nachlade- Packmethode beim Endometriurnkarzi- ed. Edinbourgh: Livingstone, 1967.
nom. Rontgenberichte 1988; 17: 226. 43. Milickovic N, Lahanas M, Papagiannopoulou M, et al. Multi-
27. Henschke UK, Hilaris BS, Mahan GD. Afterloading in inter- objective anatomy-based optimization for HDR-brachytherapy
stitial and intracavitary radiation therapy. Am I Roentgenol with constraints free deterministic algorithms. Phys Med Bio
1963; 90: 386-395. 2002; 147: 2263-2380.
28. Hilaris BS, Nori D. Brachytherapy oncology: concepts and tech- 44. Nag S, Cano E, Demanes DJ, et al. The American Brachythe-
niques. In: McKenna RJ, Murphy GP, eds. Fundamentals of rapy Society Recommendations for High-Dose-Rate Brachy-
surgical oncology. New York: Macmillan, 1986: 335-344. therapy for Head-And-Neck Carcinoma. Int J Rad Oncol Biol
29. Hilaris B, Tenner M, Moorthy C, et al. Three-dimensional bra- Phys 2001; 50(5): 1190-1198.
chytherapy treatment planning at New York Medical College. 45. Narayana MS, Roberson PL, Winfield RJ, et al. Impact of ul-
In: Mould RF, Battermann II, Martinez AA, Speiser BL, eds. trasound and computed tomography prostate volume registra-
Brachytherapy from radium to optimization. Veenendaal: Nu- tion on evaluation of permanent prostatc implants. Int J Ra-
cletron International B.V., 1994: 307-313. diat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 341-346.
30. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measure- 46. Paterson R. The Treatment of Malignant Disease by Radium
ments, ICRU Report 38, Dose and volume specification for re- and X-rays. London: Edward Arnold, 1948.
porting intracavitary therapy in gynaecology. Bethesda: ICRU, 47. Pfandner K, Atzinger A, Breit A. MR treatment planning in
1985. Brachytherapy. In: Mould RF, Muller RP, eds. Brachytherapy
31. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measure- in Gennany. Veenendaal: Nucletron International B.V., 1993:
ments, ICRU Report 58: Dose and Volume Specification for 215-226.
Reporting Interstitial Therapy. Bethesda: ICRU, 1997. 48. Quinlby EH. The grouping of radium tubes in packs and pla-
32. Joslin CAP, Flynn A. Dose specifications and associated pro- ques to produce the desired distribution of radiation. Am J
blems, Brachytherapy 1984, Proceedings of the 3rd internatio- Roentgenol 1932; 27: 18.
nal Selectron users meeting, Mould (editor), Nucletron Leer- 49. Rotte K. Das ferngesteuerte Nachladeverfahren (remote con-
sum, 1985: 218-226. trolled afterloading) fr die intrakavitare Kontakttherapie (Bra-
33. Kolotas C, Birn B, Baltas D, et al. CT guided template techni- chytherapie) gynakologischer Karzinome. Radiologe 1983; 23:
que intcrstitial brachytherapy. In: Zamboglou N, ed. New de- 20-23.
velopments in interstitial remote controlled brachytherapy. 50. Stitt J. Dose specification for inoperable endometrial carcino-
Mnchen: W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 1997: 143-152. ma: the Madison system. Activity Journal, Supplement 2, 1993;
34. Kolotas C, Birn G, Ballas D, et al. CT guided interstitial high 32-34.
dose rate brachytherapy for recurrent malignant gliomas. Br J 51. Strassmann G, Kolotas C, Heyd R, et al. Navigation system for
Radiol 1999; 72: 805-808. interstitial brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2000; 56: 49-57.
35. Kolotas C, Baltas D, Zamboglou N. CT based interstitial HDR 52. Strassmann G, Walter S, Kolotas C, et al. Reconstruction and
. 89

navigation system for intraoperative brachytherapy using the Aa, Speiser BL, eds. Brachytherapy from Radium to Optimi-
flab technique for colorectal tumor bed irradiation. Int J Ra- zation. Veenendadl: Nucletron International, 1994: 331-351.
diat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47: 1323-1329. 57. Van der Laarse R, Prins TPE. Comparing the stepping source
53. Ten Haken R, Diaz R, McShan D, et al. From manual to 3D dosimetry system and the Paris system using volume-dose hi-
computerized treatment planning for 125I stereotactic brain stograms of breast implants. In: Mould RE, Battennan J, Mar-
implants. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15: 467-480. tinez Aa, Speiser BL, eds. Brachytherapy from Radium to Op-
54. Tonus C, Kolotas C, Appel P, et al. Colorectales Carcinom - timization. Veenendaal: Nucletron International, 1994: 352-372.
Behandlungsalternative durch intraoperative Radiotherapie 58. Vickram B, Shivaji D, Beitler JJ, et al. The relationship bet-
mittels Afterloading-flab- Technik. Chirurg 1999; 70: 43-48. ween dose homogeneity hot spots and complications follow-
55. Tsalpatouros A, Baltas D, Kolotas C, et al. CT based software ing high-dose rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
for 3D localisation and reconstruction in stepping source bra- 1999; 43: 983-987.
chytherapy. IEEE, Transactions on infonnation technology in 59. Willins J, Wallner K. CT-based dosimetry for transperineal -
biomedicine, 1997; Vol. 1, No. 4: 229-242. 125 prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;
56. Van der Laarse R, Prins TPE. Introduction to HDR brachy- 39: 347-353.
therapy Optimisation. In: Mould RE, Battennan J, Martinez



. . , . , . , .

-
- (Major Histocompatibility Complex MHC). -
() .
. -- CD3
, - TCR -
, - ,
, IFN-. MHC.
-, , - MHC -
-, CD3+ / TCR+ -.
- -O
-
-
. -
, -
- -
. -
-
,
1 ( 1 ), -
MHC.
-
[CR / CD3] [C-] -
. O -

-
,
(Natural Killer cells ), - .
, - CD2
1 CD43. - -
. MHC ,
- IL-2, -
-- -. MHC
, - IL-2 -
- -.
, - ,
, --
, - (Helper cells
. T), - (Suppressor
cells TS) - (Cyto-
O - toxic cells TC)1-3. -
O O OO O
CD4 , TC -
O CD8 . CD4+ -
. H - - MHC -
, CD8+ TC -
[CD3 / TCR] ( Cell Receptor TCR) - MHC
-. . Y ,
CD4+ -

91
92 OY

, MHC . CD3 . O TCR /


10% -
6,7.
CD45. [CR/CD3] -
(splicing) 8 ( ),
CD45 mRNA. , - , -
, -
CD45. . O CD3 -
-- - -
, - v . ,
(200245 KD, CD45RA , -,
+ ). - -Fcy . -
-, in vitro - [TCR/CD3] -
, -
CD45RA+ CD45RO+4. , CD3 . O -
CD4+CD45RO+ MHC,
, , , - ,
, -
CD4+CD45RA+ TCR /+.
. , CD4+CD45RO+ - /+ - -
in vitro , .
in vivo. - TCR /+ -
CD4+CD45RO+ - /+ - -
- , MHC
CD4+CD45RA+ -
(naive), . - MHC.
CD45RA+ CD45RO+ - /+ - -
CD8+ - - MHC. -
. CD8+CD45RO+ /+ -
- /+ - -
, /+ - -
in vivo, CD8+ MHC.
CD45RA+ ,
. OO -O
- -
O OO -O TCR
( CELL RECEPTOR TCR) MHC -
- TCR ( II.
/ / ) , - CD3 -
- . -
(CD3)5. -
TCR - [CR / CD3] -
, 49 -. -
42 KD, - -
8090 KD. 90% (cell-adhesion)
TCR / -
CD4+ CD8+ , [TCR / CD3]
- (110%) [-C] (co-activation). CD2
CD4 - -
CD8 , - .
/ TCR, CD2 LF-3
. 93

- ii) --
8. ,
CD11 / CD18 (LFA-1) ICAM-1 ICAM-2 CD4 CD8 TCR
MHC11.
-9. -
, -
-- OOO O
, CD28 710. O - - -

IL- . O ,
2 - - - -
7 - -
, , ,
- 7-1 7-210. - -
IL-2,
CD28 7 - .
. - -
CD4 . - -
CD8, -
. -, , -
CD4 CD8 - , , -
MHC , - , . -
[CD3/TCR] - - [C-
. ] -
CD4 CD8 , -
-, -
. - --
i) - . CD8+ -
CD4 CD8 - -
MHC -CD4 -CD8, - , -
-, (. 1). CD4+ -

FasL
IL-2
GM-CSF
CD4+
+ CD8+
+ IFN-
TNF-
TCR/CD4
TNF- IL-18 CD40 ligand (L)
IL-2 IL-12 CD40
GM-CSF TNF-
IFN- IL-1 IL-12 MHC II
MHC I
TCR/CD8

CD40
CD80
""

1. CD4+ CD8+ -
. CD4+ (Dendritic Cells DCs), ,
, CD8 -
.
94 OY


LFA-3
MHC 7-1 (CD80)
B7-2 (CD86) ICAM-1

IFN-
GM-CSF
IL-4
TNF-
CD4 IL-1
IL-6
TNF-
IL-12
IL-15

-
1 2
LFA-1 CD2
lck
TCR p56 CD28

2. .
(CR-MHC / , CD28-B7-1 B7-2, LFA-1-
ICAM-1, CD2-LFA-3) .

1 (1) - .
, . -
CD4+ - 2 (2) - , -
--
, (.. -
- , ),
12,13. - (prim-
, , - ing phase).
-
- , -
, - , -
- (. 2). .
. ,
OKTONA
O OO -
O .
(Natural iller cells IL-2, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, IL-18
cells) , - -- F-14-16.
, -
. - - , 3 , , -
, -
(severe combined im- . -
munodeficient SCID) - (.. IL-
RAG-1 RAG-2 (RAG-1 12, L-15 IL-18),
RAG-2 knock out mice). - (.. - IL-2),
- . -
oo (mmunoglobulin Ig)
- ( Cell Receptor TCR), 5 : ) -
- - , .. CD2, CD18, CD54
. 95

CD40, ) , .. IL-1, TNF- Histocompatibility Complex MHC), -


IL-2, ) , .. IFN-, L-1, TNF-, , ,
IL-2, ) - TNF (.. FasL) (
) 17-19. 150.000 ). -
,
- ,
. . -
,
OO -
, , -
I OO
, - (.. -
K
) (. 3).

OO O O
(ligands) -.
OO O
, ,
, O Killer Inhibitory Recep-
, tors (KIR) -
. KIR -
, HLA , HLA-C
. O , - (p58 KIR), HLA-B (p70), 1, HLA- (p140)
, HLA-G (p49 / KIR2DL4)20,21. -
, - HLA-E
. MHC. -
O , , - CD94 / NKG2A -
(Major C. -



CD94/NKG-2C

CD94/NKG-2
'

IFN-, TNF- CD94/NKG-2

NKG/2D
?

?
? KIR2,3GL

KIR2DL4 /?

KIR2,3DS

NCR
p46, p30, p44



+ IFN-R
TNF CD2
: FasL CD69
IL-15R CD44
IL-18R CD54
IL-12R CD226

3. . -
: ) , , IFN-, TNF-
FasL, CD69, ) -
.
96 OY

vv , -
KIR , (antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity ADCC)
KIR ,
. Fc
KIR, MHC - 23.
, - FcyRIII, -
v , IgG1 IgG3
, . -
-24. O
OO O O --
I OO O ,
O , KIR, - -
(granzymes). ADCC -
,
(adaptors) , . ADCC
,
22. O -
: -
, Fc .
- --
CD3 FceR (p46, p44, OO
p30, CD16) - OO O O
OO
D (NKG2D). O -
-
,

stress ( .. -
) - , -
. -,
--
OO o -
FC OO O
.
-, - ,
MHC . - , , -
-
- . -
, - -
. - , , TRP-1,
TRP-2 gp100, -
. , -
, ,
, - 25,
- 27.

, -
.
. - - (Tumor In-
- filtrating Lymphocytes TIL) -
, IL-2
() . , -
- -
- - .
. 97

MHC ex vivo - 111 - -


- -, - .
- - IL-
- (CTL), 2
Melan-A / MART-1 *0201, - 31,32.
28.
TIL
gp100 - IL-2 35% 40%.
- , -
16, -
. - .
-
99 gp75/TRP-1 , IL -
gp75+ B16F10 - . -
. O - TIL -
- .

. TIL TNF-
, TIL
MAGE -ESO-1, , -
, , - -
29,30.
, TIL. , ,
, - cDNA TNF-, -
. TNF -
35.
-
, - TNF
, - , -
, , 400 g/kg. -
.
- 8 g/kg -
. .
TIL , TNF--
TIL IL-2 TIL
TNF, --
-, - , . -
(). - , TNF, -
-
ooo - , -
. o-- .
-, -
TNF TIL -
-. O - - TNF -
, , . O -
. LTR Moloney34,
-, -- , -
- (TIL, Tumor-nfiltrating Lymphocy- ,
tes), in vitro - - CMV.
-
. - TNF TIL.
98 OY

TNF, , -
17kDa o- , ,
26kDa, - -
17kDa. HLA .
cDNA o TNF, ,
- IFN-, - HLA- ,
TNF. - , -
TNF , ,
.
26kDa. - -
TNF , - -
TNF TIL , Fv (ScFv, Single-chain Fv domain),
- -
cDNA o TNF. ( VL), -
( V). -
. Fv -
YFC -
- - - Sp6 (Sp-y),
MOv18 (-), -
- 38kDa ,
-
TIL . 35,36.
- -
(mAb), - - - -
, .
, - -. -

, - O-3, - --
. -
-. - -
- -
) , -
- . ,
, ) - --
,
) -
(Human Arti-Mouse Antibody response , -
).
- , V
, - .
-
, O O
-
, -
- TCR -
Fc -
(YFC). , . (immunodomi-
nant) ,
, , in
, , - vitro
, ,
. 99

, - , -
/ - -
, 39,40
(Antigen Presenting Cells C)37,38. - (. 4).
-

MHC , v, -
- -
. -
, - v -
gp100, - , .. ,
IL-2, .
42%. - ,
,
, . , -
- v
v .
vv. -

vvvv
, ,
vv-
. , - vv , -
- .
v , -
v, - .
v . - ,

CD

154
C- ( CD
MH 4 0L
)
DCs
CD83 bi
CD80 bi
CD86 bi
MHC bi
PB

C
M


-4
F IL

G M-CS

4. (Dendritic Cells DCs). (Peripheral Blood


Mononuclear Cells PBMCs) , , in vitro -
GM-CSF IL-4 5-7 . T DCs CD40L, -
.
100 OY

, , -
DNA41. -- ( -
RNA , - -
, . ADCC)
- -
CD4+ CD8+ -
, , .
MHC -
, - -
. , , , -
, , -
,
. -
, / - .
, / -
D, -
. , -

OO I
(Human Anti-
Mouse Antibody ),
Kohler Milstein (1975)42

, . -
-
. -
-

NK

5. . -
.
, -
.
. 101

-
. -
, , - -
- ( ).
- O
. ( 12 )46.
-
-

O -
. , -
- -
20 . -

,
,
- .
43,44. ,
- -
- 17-1 (anti-Ep-CAM -
) -
, - ( ), -
45. ( C
Dukes), -
- 30%
(. 5). 27%

- .
-
- ,
- . -
-. - , ,
, , 300 mCi/m2 -
- CC49 (-TAG-72 )
- 131,
- .

, , -
- (56 cGy).
. 131- 1 (-CD20 , , -
) ,
75%, dg- 2, 15 , -
kins ( , .
) ,
131
33 (-33 ),
(76% 50% ). -
( 100%) -
. 23
- , -
, -
102 OY

LTR L VH VL S neo LTR

-
SV40

VH VL (ScFv): ,
: 15
: 59
: TCR- - Fc()RIII
L, LTR:
neo: GH18

6. ScFv . -
, - ,
.

47,48. 2530%
-
, - , -
- 49.
. , , rhuMabHER2 -
46 .
- -
F (ScF), MFE-23, - ( 50% -
(CEA) ) 12% ,
. 37% -
ScF, - . rhuMabHER2
, - -
-
(. 6). - p185HER2 (ECDHER2), -
, rhuMabHER2
ScF, . -
-
,
, -
. . -

-
,
- -
. ,
, -
-
. -
-HER2. ,
rhuMabHER2, - rhuMabHER2 , -
p185HER2 -
( HER2/neu), -
. p185HER2 - p185
HER2 (23,50).
(EGFR), Ley
. 103

, -
I
- TIL
. (..
( Ley TNF-) .
) ,
-
. (naked) DNA - (mini-
genes), DNA
-

-
, 41.


-
DNA -
G250, -
(.. ), , -
. O
,
G225, 131,
. DNA
) -
0,1% - (CEA), ..
/g (ID/g), , ) PSA
0,001 , ) MC-1 -
0,01% (ID/g). - ) Melan-A / MART-1 -
(HACA) 2 16 - 53-55.
. G250 - -
, 131, -
, ,
.
.
G250 CEA - IL-2
- IL-2,
, IL-6, IL-7 IL-12, -
.
51-52. -
ADCC 56.
IL-2 in i IL-2 -
. - OO
ADCC -

, -

(GD2, GD3) 17-1,

-
. , in itr in i ,
.

, CD3 -
(-), CD16 ( ) - ,
, . -
-
O ,
- -
- .
104 OY

1. Rmagnani S. The Th1/Th2 paradigm. Immunl Tday 1997; characteristics f the intercellular adhesin mlecule-1 (CD54)
18: 263. expressed n cyttxic human bld lymphcytes. Cellimmu-
2. Drf , Kuchr K, Cllins . Suppressr cells: sme nl 1990; 131: 366.
answers but mre questins. Immunl Tday 1992; 13: 241. 20. Wilsn MJ, Trkar , Trwsdale J. Genmic rganizatin f
3. Barry , Bleackley RC. Cyttxic lymphcytes: all rads lead a human killer cell inhibitry receptr gene. Tissue Antigens
t deat. Nat Rev Immunl 2000; 2: 401. 1997; 49: 574.
4. Trwbridge IS, Thmas . CD45: an emerging rle as a pr- 21. ales-Gmez , Reyburn , Erskins RA, Lpez-Btet ,
tein tyrsine phsphatase required fr lymphcyte activatin Strminger JL. Kinetics and peptide dependency f the bind-
and develpment. nnu Rev Immunl 1994; 12: 85. ing f the inhibitry receptr CD94/NKG2-A and the acti-
5. Allisn JP, Lanier . The structure, functin and serlgy f vating receptr CD94/NKG2-C t HLA-E. O 1999; 18:
the cell antigen receptr cmplex. nn Rev Immunl 1987; 4250.
5: 585. 22. Blassni R, Cantni C, Falc . The human leukcyte antigen
6. Garcia KC, Degan , Stanfield RL, Brunmark , Jacksn (HLA)-C- specific activatry or inhibitry natural killer
MR, Petersn , Teytn L, Wilsn . n alphabeta -cell cell receptrs display highly hmlgus extracellular dmains
receptr structure at 2.5 and its rientatin in the TCR- but differ in their transmembrane and intracytplasmic pr-
MHC cmplex. Science 1996; 274: 176. tins. J xp Med 1996; 183: 645.
7. Garbczi O, Ghsh , Utz U, Fan QR, Biddisn WE, Wiley 23. Carsn WE, Parihar R, Lindemann MJ, Persneni , Dierk-
DC. Structure f the cmplex between human -cell receptr, sheide J, Merpl NJ, Baselga J, Calgiuri . Interleukin-2
viral peptide and HLA-A2. Nature 1996; 384: 134. enhances the natural killer cell respnse t Herceptin-cated
8. Bierer , Burakff SJ. -lymphcyte activatin: the bilgy Her2/neu-psitive breast cancer cells. Eur J Immunl 2001;
and functin f CD2 and CD4. Immunl Rev 1989; 111: 267. 31: 3016.
9. Springer . Adhesin receptrs f the immune system. Natu- 24. Rbertsn MJ, Ritz J. Bilgy and clinical relevance f human
re 1990; 346: 425. natural killer cells. Bld 1990; 76: 2421.
10. Linsley PS, Ledbetter JA. The rle f the CD28 receptr 25. Parkhurst MR, DePan C, Riley JP, Rsenberg SA, Shu S.
during cell respnses t antigen. nnu Rev Immunl 1993; Hybrids f dendritic cells and tumr cells generated by electr-
11: 191. fusin simultaneusly present immundminant epitpes frm
11. Parnes JR. Mlecular bilgy and functin f CD4 and CD8. multiple human tumr-assciated antigens in the cntext f
Adv Immunl 1989; 44: 265. MHC class I and class II mlecules. J Immunl 2003; 170:
12. Paganelli R, Scala , Aiuti F, Firilli . B-cell help by Tc2 5317.
cells. Immunl Tday 1998; 19: 142. 26. Negriu G, Dwek RA, Petrescu SM. The inhibitin f early N-
13. Ma J, Chen , Mandelin J, Cepnis , Miller , Hukkanen glycan prcessing targets TRP-2 t degradatin in 16 mela-
, Ma GF, Knttinen U. Regulatin f macrphage activa- nma cells. J il Chem 2003; 278: 27035.
tin. Cell l Life Sci 2003; 60: 2334. 27. Mandelcrn-Mnsn RL, Shear , Yau , Sambhara S, Bar-
14. Fehniger , Caligiuri . Interleukin 15: bilgy and rele- ber , Spaner D, DeBenedette . Cyttxic lymphcyte
vance t human disease. Bld 2001; 97: 14. reactivity t gp100, MelanA/MART-1, and tyrsinase, in HLA-
15. Fehninger , Shah , Turner MJ, anDeusen JB, Whit- A2-psitive vitilig patients. J Invest Dermatl 2003; 121: 550.
man SP, Cper , Suzuki , Wechser , Gdsaid F, Cal- 28. Garbe C, Leiter U, Ellwanger U, Blaheta HJ, Meier F, Rass-
giuri . Differential cytkine and chemkine gene expres- ner G, Schittek . Diagnstic value and prgnstic significance
sin by human cells fllwing activatin with l-18 or l-15 f prtein S-100beta, melanma-inhibitry activity, and tyrsi-
in cmbinatin with l-12: implicatins fr the innate immune nase/MART-1 reverse transcriptin-plymerase chain rea-
respnse. J Immunl 1999; 162: 4511. ctin in the fllw-up f high-risk melanma patients. Cancer
16. Dunne J, Lynch, S, OFarrelly C, Tdryk S, Hegarty JE, Fei- 2003; 97: 1737.
ghery C, Dherty DG. Selectie expansin and partial activa- 29. Reynlds SR, Zeleniuch-Jacqutte , Shapir RL, Rses DF,
tin f human cells and receptr-psitive cells by l- Harris , Jhnstn D, Bystryn JC. accine-induced CD8+
2 and l-15. J Immunl 2001; 167: 3129. -cell respnses t MAGE-3 crrelate with clinical utcme in
17. Lee RK, Spielman J, Zha OU, Olsen KJ, Pdack ER. Perf- patients with melanma. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 657.
rin, Fas Ligand, and tumr necrsis factr are the majr cyt- 30. Yakirevich , Sab , Lavie O, Mazareb S, Spagnli GC, Res-
txic mlecules used by Lymphkine-activated killer cells. J nick . Expressin f the MAGE-A4 and NY-ESO-1 can-
Immunl 1996; 157: 1919. cer-testis antigens in serius varian neplasms. Clin Cancer
18. Timnen , Gahmberg CG, Patarry . Participatin f Res 2003; 9: 6453.
CD11a- c/CD18, CD2 and RGD-binding receptrs in endge- 31. Ridlfi L, Ridlfi R, Riccbn , De Pala F, Petrini , Ste-
nus and interleukin-2- stimulated activity f CD3-nega- fanelli , Flamini , Raaili , erdecchia GM, Trevisan G,
tive large granular lymphcytes. Int J Cancer 1990; 46: 1035. Amadri D. Adjuvant immuntherapy with tumr infiltrating
19. Wang , anky F, i SL, Patarry , Klein . Functinal lymphcytes and interleukin-2 in patients with resected stage
. 105

III and IV melanma. J Immunl 2003; 26: 156. 44. Abken , Hmbach , Reinhldu, Ferrne S. Can cmbined
32. Figlin RA, Thmpsn JA, Bukwski RM, gelzang NJ, N- -cell and antibdy based immuntherapy utsmart tumr
vick AC, Lange , Steinberg GD, Belldegrun AS. Multicenter, cells? Immunl Tday 1998; 19: 2.
randmized, phase III trial f CD8(+) tumr-infiltrating lym- 45. Sung , Queen C. Humanized antibdies fr therapy. Nature
phcytes in cmbinatin with recmbinant interleukin-2 in me- 1991; 351: 501.
tastatic renal cell carcinma. J Clin Oncl 1999; 17: 2521. 46. Frer , Lbugli AF. Histry f antibdy therapy fr nn-
33. Hwu , Yannelli J, Kriegler , Andersn WF, Perez C, Hdgkins lymphma. Semin Oncl 2003; 30: 1.
Chiang U, Schwarz S, Cwherd R, Delgad C, Mule J. Fun- 47. Smith CL, Dulphy , Sali , Cerundl V. Immuntherapy
ctinal and mlecular characterizatin f tumr-infiltrating f clrectal cancer. r Med ull 2002; 64: 181.
lymphcytes transduced with tumr necrsis factr-alpha cDNA 48. Welt S, Divgi CR, Kemeny , Finn RD, Sctt , Graham
fr the gene therapy f cancer in humans. J Immunl 1993; Germain JS, Richards EC, Larsn SM, Oettgen HF. Phase III
150: 4104. study f idine 131-labeled mnclnal antibdy 33 in pa-
34. Treisman J, Hwu , Yannelli JR, Shafer GE, Cwherd R, Sa- tients with advanced cln cancer. J Clin Oncl 1994; 12: 1561.
mid D, Rsenberg SA. Upregulatin f tumr necrsis factr- 49. Schultz , Weber BL. Recent advances in breast cancer bil-
alpha prductin by retrvirally transduced human tumr-in- gy. Curr Opin Oncl 1999; 11: 429.
filtrating lymphcytes using trans-retinic acid. Cell Immunl 50. Kub , Mrisaki , Kurki , Tasaki , Yamanaka , Ma-
1994; 156: 448. tsumt , Nakamura , Onishi , Baba , Katan . Cm-
35. Gritzapis O, Mamalaki , Kretsvali , Papamatheakis J, binatin f adptive immuntherapy with Herceptin fr pa-
Belimezi , Perez SA, Baxevanis CN, Papamichail . Redi- tients with HER2-expressing breast cancer. Anticancer Res
recting muse hybridma against breast and varian carci- 2003; 23: 4443.
nmas: in viv activity against HER-2/neu expressing cancer 51. Mulders PF, De Mulder . The rle f adjuvant immun-
cells. r J Cancer 2003; 88: 1292. therapy in renal cell carcinma. Curr Opin Oncol 2002, Rep 3:
36. Mritz D, Wels W, Mattern J, Grwer . Cyttxic lymph- 44.
cytes with a grafted recgnitin specificity fr ERBB2-expres- 52. Bruwers , Dorr U, Lang O, Berman OC, Oyen WJ,
sing tumr cells. Prc Natl Acad Sci 1994; 91: 4318. Steffens MG, Osterwijk , Mergenthaler HG, Bihl , Cr-
37. Wang RF, Rsenberg SA. Human tumr antigens fr cancer stens FH. 131 I-cG250 mnclnal antibdy immunscintigra-
vaccine develpment. Immunl Rev 1999; 170: 85. phy versus [18 F]FDG-PET imaging in patients with metastatic
38. Slingluff CL Jr, Petrni GR, Yamshchikv G, Barnd DL, renal cell carcinma: a cmparative study. Nucl Med Cmmun
Eastham S, Galavtti , Pattersn JW, Deacn O, Hibbitts 2002; 23: 229.
S, Teates D, Neese U, Grsh WW, Chianese-Bullck , 53. Mincheff , Altankva I, Zubak S, Tchakarv S, Btev C,
Wdsn , Wiernasz CJ, Merrill , Gibsn J, Rss , En- Petrv S, Krusteva , Kurteva G, Kurte , Dimitrv , Ilieva
gelhard v. Clinical and immunlgic results f a randmized , Gergiev G, Lissitchkv , Chernzemski L, Meryman .
phase II trial f vaccinatin using fur melanma peptides n viv transfectin and/r crss-priming f dendritic cells fl-
either administered in granulcyte- macrphage clny-stimu- lwing D and adenviral immunizatins fr immunthe-
lating factr in adjuvant or pulsed n dendritic cells. J Clin rapy f cancerchanges in peripheral mnnuclear subsets
Oncl 2003; 21: 4016. and intracellular l-4 and IFN-gamma lymphkine prfile. Crit
39. Hernand JJ, Park TW, Kuhn WC. Dendritic cell-based vac- Rev Oncl Hematl 2001; 39: 125.
cines in breast and gynaeclgic cancer. Anticancer Res 2003; 54. Jhnen , Kulbe , Pecher G. Lng-term tumr grwth sup-
23: 4293. pressin in mice immunized with naked D f the human
40. Cranmer LD, Trevr , Hersh . Clinical applicatins f tumr antigen mucin (MUC1). Cancer Immunllmmunther
dendritic cell vaccinatin in the treatment f cancer. Cancer 2001; 50: 356.
Immunllmmunther 2003, v 26. 55. Mincheff , Tchakarv S, Zubak S, Lukinv D, Btev C,
41. rnor R, Ben-Yedidia . Old and new vaccine appraches. Int Altankva 1, Gergiev G, Petrv S, Meryman . Naked D
Immunpharmacl 2003; 3: 1195. and adenviral immunizatins fr immuntherapy f prstate
42. Khler G, Milstein C. Cntinuus cultures f fused cells secre- cancer: a phase III clinical trial. ur Urol 2000; 38: 208.
ting antibdy f predefined specificity. Nature 1975; 256: 495. 56. Ettinghansen SE, Rsenberg SA. Immuntherapy and gene
43. Glennie MJ, Jhnsn PW. Clinical trials f antibdy therapy. therapy f cancer. Adv Surgery 1995; 28: 223.
Immunl Tday 2000; 21: 403.

. T

I . -
- (cell
- cycle kinetics),
(tissue growth
/ . - kinetics) . -

- .
.
O O O
-
O O O YO
:
1. , -
- . O
, -
1. -
2. (. 1).
- G1
(gap1 = ) G0.
- ,
. M , -
(proliferati- ( -
ve index) -

2,3.
3. O G0



4.


- G2 (m =1h)
(TG2 = 6h st
,
3h 184h)
DNA=4N

DNA=2N

-
G1
, - (TG1 = 23h
- 3h 180h)
-
5.
S (Ts = 17h
10 130h) A
D N
- 1. -
, - ()
- .

107
108 OY

) D = 2 10%. S0, DNA 2 4. -


G1 - S
12 24 .
DNA. - ,
G1 23 . - DNA
D, G0 ( - G2 (gap2= ). -
). G0 G2 6 .
(. 2). G0 G2.
, G2 -
-
, (- 1 . -
), - 24
. G1 - 6.
S 17 . O -
DNA 2 4, , -
-
, ,

DNA

ATM?
;
ATM
Chk 1,2

p53 ATM 14, 3, 3

Bax

cdc25
p21
?
Nbs 1

/cdk /cdk

RB E2F1

2. .
DNA .
, .
G1, DNA p53.
, gadd45, mdm2, p21, G Bax,
p21WAF1/CIP1 . S,
DNA DNA ATM nbs110.
G2 M, DNA chk1 chk2
cdc25. cdc25
14-3-3 /cdk1 MTF (maturation promot-
ing factor). O , , .
. 109

. Li-Fraumeni8.
, , - DNA p53 ,
DNA, -
DNA S (CKI) p21WAF1/CIP1. -
p21WAF1/CIP1
. - / cdk (cyclin dependent kinases),
: G1
1. , GM-CSF S
( - RB (. 2)9.
) . G1 S p53
2. .
3. -
. DNA. p53
4. , -
- .
. S
5. , , -
O -

S DNA -
,
. (mutat-
.
ed in ataxia-telangiectasia)
6. O- , p53 -
S. -
. -

-
-

, p53,
5.
DNA ,
DNA10.
(cell cycle checkpoints) G2 S
- H G2
-
-
7. - G2
, - . -
, - DNA chk1,
, - cdc25 (. 2)9.
. - cdc25
/ cdk1 MTF (matura-
. - tion promoting factor), -
, , - . cdc25
, - -
, 14-3-3. -
DNA - ,
- .
.

G1 S
- p53 -
G1 , -
DNA. -
p53 . -
, -
110 OY

-

(. 3).
-
-
. -
-

-
S (, , -
DNA)
,
.
3. .
O OOO OE
, ( MAD1, MAD2, MAD3, (-PULSE LABELED MITOSES)
BUB1, BUB2, BUB3) 11, -
- S -
. -
p53 - 3H-Th. -
12, -
p53 - , -
. -
- . -
-
- -
(3H-Th)13. - 14. -
o -
,
DNA. , , -
, 4. -
. O S
3-Th - 3-Th,
, - .
- 3-Th
- G2

A
4.
100
-
. -
S G2 S ( )
75 ,
B M

S ( ) -
G1
. -
50 3H-h -
TG2 TS -
TC ,
G2.
25 -

S


0
.
. 111

(G2).
S ( ) -

-
-
S (s). -
- (LASER)

-
(c). PLM
S, G2
, G1 -

, 3 -
.
(c) - 5. .
1
2 ,
2 3 15. - -
PLM DNA -
- .
. , , (
c (O) )
2,5 -
2 9. , .
, O - , -
, - Laser
,
. -
PLM
, (-
, ). 6 -
, - DNA DNA.
G0/G1 4 DNA.
DNA -
S
, G0 / G1 G2 / M. -
- S -
. DNA -

OI OH (TLI). -
S S S + G2 / S -
-
DNA . .
DNA S 0,05 ( ..
- )
(. 5). , , S 0,15 (-
- )
- S 0,3 (
, Burkitt) 16.
DNA . - DNA ()
, , - G0 / G1, -
, Laser. DNA DNA -
17.
112 OY

3200 3200
G0/G1
2800 2800
G0/G1
2400 2400


2000 2000

1600 1600

G0/G1
1200 1200




800 800

G2/

G2/
400 G2/M
400
S
0 0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 0 32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256
DNA DNA

6. DNA ( DNA)
() ( DNA) ().

O OO
1. (TL)
O A A (Growth Fraction GF)
, TLI
-
, Burkitt 0,29
0,09
. -
M 0,110,24
& 0,050,11
G0 - 0,08
, - 0,05
. - 0,05
0,03
- 0,02
- 0,02
3-Th. -
(LI, Thymidine
Labeling Index). O TLI - S
DNA DNA 3-Th. -
3-Th ( - , -
:
). O TLI : GF = TLI c /s ,
c s -
TLI =
S
O L - PLM. O TLI
( 1% 8%), 3-
, Th ( 1) -
Burkitt, ,
30%, -
, 16%. 18.

(CELL LOSS)
,
(. 1). O , EO H
, O -
, - :
. 113

-
,
,
,
:
= K ,

, -
(simple exponential growth pattern) (.
8). , -
7. (-
-
), ( - , -
) ( ). ,

1. . (. 8).
2. (-
) AA O OO A GOMPERTZ
3. . O
- . -
-
- , -
/ . -
, . - L1210
- (. 8)19,20.
-
/ .
7, - , -
( - Gompertz 182521. -
) Gompertz
( ), - -
(- (. 8). Gompertz -
) -
(high cell turnover rate).
, -
. ( ). -


Log N

Log N

8. . . . Gompertz.
114 OY

1014
1012
1012 1 KG

10
10
1010

10 G
109
1G
1,3 x 108
108 130 MG

9.
(30 )
106 -
106 -
.
104

(27 )
102

1
10 20 30 40 50

, - . Gom-
, - pertz , -
. ,
Gompertz, . 0,109 , -
( - 1 10 , 0,120
109 ), 2 - 10 102, 0,131
. Gompertz - 102 103 (. 2).
- O
, , Gompertz
. - , -
( ) -
, - ) , -
1012 ( 1 kg
), (. 9). -
, , ) -
108 (1/10 - , )
) 1010 ( ) - ) -

2. ( 10)
( ) - , ..

I TTOO A
()
EO O OOY AO (LOG
0 1 ILL)
0,109 10

0,229 102
0,360 103 Skipper et al. ,
0,506 104 L1210,
(0,553) (2 104) -
0,670 105

0,858 106
1,078 107 -
1,343 108 , -
1,674 109 22. -
2,120 1010 ,
2,801 1011
4,306 1012
(, -
, ..)
. 115

1012

1011
3
1010

109

108

107

106 1

105

104

103

102

101

100 1 2 3 4 5

10. .
, ,
. 99,9% (3 ) , -
. -
, : .

, , -
- L1210 ,
, .
Skipper et al -
. - L1210 -
-
( ) . ( 106 -
, , )
. -
. , , -

1010 .
(. 8),
99,9%
-
,
.
1 -
Skipper

10, L1210
1010 107 (Log ill= 3). - , -
- 1,
-
- .
-
,
- -
5 (. 10). ,
116 OY

. -
, -
-
. ,
.
-
OI -
. , -
) -
, -
,

)
-

.
.
O OEO GOLDIE COLDMAN
-
-

Lu-
,
ria Delbruck25.
. ,
Escherichia coli
.
-
, -
,
, , -
-
(), -
. , 1979, Goldie

Coldman ,
,

.
,

.
-
,
.
-
-
, o, ,
-
26.

:
. -
- 0 = 1
(sanctuary) - e (N 1)
. -
() - 0
- () -
. ,
. -
- . ,
Goldie Coldman
-

- ,
. ,
- = 10-6 ( -
23,24. 106 ) -
- -
, , - 105 -
- 0,905. -
, - -
. 117

107 - -
0,000045. -
. -
90%, 105 , - -
, ,
107 . (.. -
Goldie Coldman ),
(. -
8). -
o -
, . Goldie Coldman
, - ,
- Hodgkin,
27. - 28-31.
, -
- . -

. - , -

Goldie Coldman
, - (
- Goldie Coldman).
,
. O , -
- .
, - Goldie Coldman ,
o ,
-
,
. .
Goldie -
Coldman - , .

- O OO O
(non-cross-resistant drugs), - (DOSE INTENSITY)
( -
)
. , -
- -
. -
, Hodgkin ( 20%),
-
. - , -
, , -
, -
. - .
-
-
Goldie Coldman, --
.
. 3,
118 OY

3. O Ridgway.
L-PAM

(RDI)
L-PAM (%) (%)

0,38 0,82 0,60 100 60


0,75 0,18 0,47 100 44
0,25 0,55 0,44 100 0
0,50 0,12 0,31 10 0
0,17 0,36 0,27 0 0

RDI: Relative Dose Intensity, L-PAM:

, (1-log)
Skipper, - . -
( ) -
Ridgway32. -
L-PAM .

, ,

( -
). - .
20%
50%. - . -
. -
Hryniuk33,
10 -

4. : , -

OOO OO O (RDI)
:
, 80 mg/m2/ ()
(DI): 560 mg/m2/
: , 100 mg/m2/ ( 1-14, 28 )
(DI): 350 mg/m2/
RDI: 350/560=0,62
OOO OO O (RDI)
*:
, 2 mg/kg/ (), DI: 560 mg/m2/
M, 0,7 mg/kg/, DI: 28 mg/m2/
5-, 12 mg/kg/, DI: 480 mg/m2/
:
, 100 mg/m2/ ( 1-14, 28 ), DI: 350 mg/m2/, RDI: 350/560=0,62
M, 40 mg/m2 1 8, DI: 20 mg/m2/, RDI: 20/28=0,71
5-, 600 mg/m2 1 8, DI: 300 mg/m2/, RDI: 300/480=0,62
28
(RDI) = (0,62 + 0,71 + 0,62) / 3= 0,65

* , 5-.
mg/kg mg/m2, 40,34
. 119

. - .
(Dose intensity DI)
-
, -
- -
(mg/m2 /week) , .
. -
(Relative dose intensity RDI) -
-
, -
-
-
(standard),
-

, . -

,

-

-
(standard).
4 34,35. , -
- . -
- -
, -
, . -
- . -
, - -
-
CMF (, - .
5-) -
. -
- , -
DNA -
- -
- -
- .

1. Bethlefsen IA, ed. Cell Cycle Effects of Drugs. Oxford: Perga- 7. Elledge SJ. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity cri-
mon Press, 1986. sis. Science 1996; 246: 603.
2. Meyer JS, Province . Proliferative Index of breast carcinoma 8. Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC. P53 muta-
by thymidine labeling. Prognostic power independent of stage, tion in human cancers. Science 1991; 253: 49.
estrogen and progesterone receptors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 9. Lim D-S, Kim S-T, Xu B, et al. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1
1988; 12: 191-204. in an S-phase pathway. Nature 2000; 404: 613.
3. Tubiana , Courdi . Cell proliferation kinetics in human so- 10. Canman CE, Lim D-S, Cimprich KA, et al. Activation of the
lid tumors: relation to probability of metastatic dissemination ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphoryliation of p53.
and long term survival. Radiother Oncol 1989; 15: 1-18. Science 1998; 281: 1677.
4. Tubiana , Koscielny S. Natural history of human breast can- 11. Hartwell LH, Kastan MB. Cell cycle control and cancer. Scien-
cer: recent data and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res ce 1994; 266: 1861.
Treat 1991; 18: 125-140. 12. Cross SM, Sanchez CA, Morgan CA, et al. A p53-dependent
5. Hunter , Pines J. Cyclins and cancer. Cell 66: 1071-1091. mouse spindle checkpoint. Science 1995; 267: 1353.
6. Norton L. The Norton-Simon hypothesis. In: Perry MC, ed. 13. Cleaver JE. Thymidine metabolism and cell L kinetics. Am-
The Chemotherapy Souree Book. Baltimore: WilIiams & Wil- sterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1967.
kins, 1992: 36-66. 14. Quastler , Sherman FG. Cell population kinetics in the inte-
120 OY

stinal epithelium of the mouse. xp Cell Res 1959; 17: 420- Cancer Treat Rep 1979; 63: 1727-1733.
438. 27. Goldie JH. Scientific basis for adjuvant and rimary (neoadju-
15. Tannock I. Cell kinetics and cancer chemotherapy: critical vant) chemotherapy. Semin Oncol 1987; 14: 1-7.
Review. Cancer Treat Rep 1978; 62: 1117-1133. 28. Bonadonna G, Valagusja , Santoro . Alternating non-cross-
16. Shacney SE, Levine M, Fisher R, et al. The biology of the tu- resistant combination chemotherapy O in stage Hodgkins
mor growth in the non-Hodgkins lymphomas: a dual parame- disease. n Intern Med 1986; 104: 738-746.
ter flow cytometry of 220 cases. J Clin Invest 1984; 73: 1201. 29. Longo DL, Duffey PL, DeVita V, et al. Treatment of advan-
17. Zackon IL, Goolsby CL. clinicians guide to flow cytometry. ced-stage Hodgkins disease: Alternating non-cross-resistant
Contemporary Oncology 1994; 4 (5): 14-36. O. J, CABS is not superir to O. J Clin Oncol 1991;
18. Cooper M, Cooper R. Principles of Medical Oncology. In: 9: 1409-1420.
Holleb , Fink DJ, Murphy GP, eds. American Cancer Socie- 30. Feld R, Evans WK, Coy , et al. Canadian multicenter rando-
ty Textbook of Clinical Oncology. American Cancer Society mized trial comparing sequential and alternating administra-
1993; 47-68. tion of two non-cross-resistant chemotherapy combinations in
19. Yankee RA, DeVita VT, Perry S. The cell cycle of leukemia patients with limited small cell carcinoma of the lung. J Clin
L1210 cells in vivo. Cancer Res 1967; 27: 2381-2385. Oncol 1987; 5: 1401-1409.
20. Skipper , Schabel FM, Mellet LB, et al. Implications of bio- 31. Aisner J, Korsuln , Perlojr , et al. randomized compari-
chemical, cytokinetic, pharmacologic, and toxicologic relation- sn of CAF, v , and v alternating with CMFVP for
ships in the design of optimal therapeutic schedules. Cancer advanced breast cancer, a CALBG study. Proc Am Soc Clin
Chemother Rep 1970; 54: 431-450. Oncol 1988; 7: 27.
21. Laird . Dynamics of growth in tumors and normal orga- 32. Skipper H. Data and analysis having to do with the influence
nisms. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1969; 30: 15-28. of dose intensity and duration of treatment (single drugs and
22. Skipper , Schabel FM Jr, Wilkox WS. xperimental evalua- combinations) on lethal toxicity and therapeutic response of
tion of potential anticancer agents. . On the criteria and experimental neoplasms. Birmingham, AL: Southern Research
kinetics associated with curability of experimental leukemia. Institute, Booklets 13, 1986, and 2-13, 1987.
Cancer Chemother Rep 1964; 35: 1-111. 33. Hryniuk WM. The importance of dose intensity in the outco-
23. Bleyer WA, Poplack DG. Prophylaxis and treatment of leu- me of chemotherapy. In: Hellman S, DeVita VT, Rosenberg S,
kemia of the central nervous system and other sanctuaries. Se- eds. Important advances in Oncology. Philadelphia: JB Lippin-
min Oncol 1985; 12: 131-148. cott, 1988: 121-141.
24. Russo , Schiliro G. The enigma of testicular leukemia: a cri- 34. Hryniuk WM. Average relative dose intensity and the impact
tical review. Med Pediatr Oncol 1986; 14: 300-3060. on design of clinical trials. Semin Oncol 1987; 14:65.
25. Luria SE, Delbmck . Mutations of bacteria from virus sensi- 35. Tannock IF, et al. randomized trial of two dose levels of cy-
tivity to virus resistance. Genetics 1943; 28: 491-511. clophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil chemotherapy
26. Goldie JH, Coldman AJ. mathematic model for relating the for patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1988;
drug sensitivity of tumors t their spontaneous mutation rate. 6: 1377-1387.

B
O

. . , . , . ...................................................... 123

ICH GCP E ........ 145

.... 181

H O
A.E. P, N.K. K ................................................................................ 195

.. , . , .

: ) -
-
) M
-
- ( -
. ),


O EO AO , .. -
, - .
(), -
. -
, .
. -
A
O
, .
. .
I H OH; M I
H E
. - ( ) .
- -
, , - , (MTD) -
. , (DLT) . -
-
. (). O -
O .
, -
. O - -
.
, . -
M
-
. , -
.
. -
O O IO- -
OOOI (3080). ,
O : ,
.

123
124 OY

M I H E

- O -
. O - .
, , :
. -
-

-

.



:
O

( - .
) (
) , -

.
.
(CRF)
OH H H
(GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE GCP) -
, - .
, , -
- .
- , -
. -
-
, - . -
. -
.
GCP : :
-
O ICH (International Conference of Har- ( -
monisation) , )
886, - (, -
. , , , , , , -
)
GCP : (

)

-
-
-
-
-
.
. 125

, - .
O :
: - -
, -
, .. -
, ..
O

O -
, ,

. CRF

.
O
GCP (Good Clinical -
Practice) .

O - OI OOI
-
, -
.
- :
O ,
, -
- -


-
, O ().
-

, (Induction chemotherapy Neoadjuvant)
E -
O - - , -
. in vivo -
.
- -
, / -
, , .
. ,
,
(monitor)
.
-
(Adjuvant)
, - E -
, -
(standard operating procedures) - ,
, GCP . O .

, -
126 OY

C Dukes,
. (Time to progression TTP)
1 -
(CR),

(PR) (SD)

/
( ) . O




( ).
, -
6 .
2
-
1 - , :
, . ( -
): ,
20 10 mm
(Dose-Limiting Toxicity DLT) : ,
20 10 mm
, - ( ): -
( - ,
grade 4 grade >3 10 10 mm
) - CT / MRI: , -
> 50% . 20 10 mm.

(Maximum Tolerated Dose MTD)
- , :
, , , ,
( CT scans MRI: -
) >50% - , >10 mm.
.
.

(Disease free survival) -
,
O
(-
).

(Overall Survival) O
O - ,
. . -
-
(Response Duration)
-
, -
(CR) - -
(PR) - .
(,
) (
) -
. -
. 127

3 . ()
, .

(
6 -, -
)
,
- - (CR):
. - , ,
3 4
. .
(PR):
( 50% , 4
) .
(CR): (SD-NC): -
- 6 -
, 4 . , -
, . 50% -
(PR): - 25%.
, - (PD):
50% - 25%
- .
. , -
/ -
50%

.
: -
, - -
, . ,
(SD-NC): - , .
, :
- ,
- 6
6 - .
, 50%, : -
25%. - -
, - 4 -
.
6 -
, < 50% < 25% .
. . -
(PD):

25% -
. - -
, - .
O ,
. - 6 (2 -
. ) .
9
.
: - O -
25% -
- :
128 OY

PD O O PD
O PD O PD
SD-NC O PD O PD SD-NC
PR O PD O PD PR
CR PD O PD PR
CR CR CR CR
O O PD PD

O -
, :

PD O O PD
O PD O PD
SD-NC O PD O PD SD-NC
PR O PD O PD PR
CR O PD O PD PR
CR CR CR CR
O O PD PD

O
, :

PD O O PD
O PD O PD
SD-NC O PD O PD SD-NC
PR O PD O PD PR
CR O PD O PD PR
CR CR CR CR
O O PD PD

/ CTG.
O . -
() , -
, , ,
, ,
, , - , , -
. . -
-
- , ,
. , - .. -
NCIC- .
. 129

-
.
. ,
. , -
.
-
30 - /
-
. O - -
( . -
30 ), -
, - .
.

1.

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

WBC (109 /L) 4,0 3,03,9 2,02,9 1,01,9 < 1,0


O (109 /L) 2,0 1,51,9 1,01,4 0,50,9 < 0,5
PLT (109 /L) E..O. ( 150,0) 75,0149,9 50,074,9 25,049,9 < 25,0
Hgb (g/dL) E..O. ( 13,0) 10,012,9 8,09,9 6,57,9 < 6,5
Hgb (g/dL) E..O. ( 12,0) 10,011,9 8,09,9 6,57,9 < 6,5
Hgb (mmol/L) 8,07 6,218,06 4,966,20 4,034,95 < 4,03
Hgb (mmol/L) 7,45 6,217,44 4,966,20 4,034,95 < 4,03
() M E

..O.:

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K A, , Y - X X
, ,



EF/CHF K A A CHF
- - CHF
> 20% 20%

K M A O
a ST - -

K A , . E,
. - -
ECG
M E
()
130 OY

OO O
K 0 1 2 3 4

K , , X Y
-

> 20 mmHg (D) > 20 mmHg (D)
> 150/100 mmHg, 150/100 mmHg,


A - A A A
(- , - > 48
- , -
48
)

/ E M
/ ( ) ( / -
/ /
) -

O 1+ 2+ - 3+ 4+,

- K N

M
()

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

E..O. 0,990,75 N 0,740,50 N 0,490,25 N > 0,24 N


E..O. 1,011,25 N 1,261,50 N 1,512,00 N > 2,00 N
E..O. 1,011,66 N 1,672,33 N 2,343,00 N > 3,00 N
() M E

..O.: , :
. 131

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K , E E

K A, - -
- - -

K E

K A E

( )
RT
A, Y
,

( )
RT
K N

( )
K N, 2

( )
- K T , E
> 2

K
N
E - M -

M E
()
- K , ,
-
/


K (
)
132 OY

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

/ M - A

N

K <1/ M >1/ ,

, A,
,
6
Cushing
E M E

K ( - M ( (
, - , - )
) )

OO O
O 0 1 2 3 4

/ -
- - -

-


O
()

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K 37,138C 38,140C > 40C (104F)


(98,7100,4F) (100,5104F) 24 24 -

K -

/ M A

N

M


()
. 133

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K -
,

K 1 24 25 24 610 24 > 10 24
-

K A 23 - A 46 - A 79 / > 10
/ / - / ,
-
-

K A - A E
, -

N, < 96 N, > 96
/ A A - M - -
, -
-


- , - A A

N
M

()

OO O
A 0 1 2 3 4

() K , ,12 - , 34 - , >4 -



K , K, O, -
- > 38C , -
< 38C (100,4F) (100,4F), -

O GVHD K V
M
()

K , A p.o. A V E
() .. - , ..

( )
A p.o. IV - E
- , ..

134 OY

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

E..O. > 1< 1,5 1,53,0 > 3,0 N


(SGOT, SGPT) E..O. 1 > 12,5 N 2,65,0 N 5,120,0 N > 20,0 N
E..O. 1 > 12,5 N 2,65,0 N 5,120,0 N > 20,0 N
5
() K H

() M E

..O.: , :

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K O - -

pO2 /pCO2 K PO2 > 70 pCO2 50, PO2 > 60 pCO2 60, PO2 > 50 pCO2 70, PO2 50
pO2 > 85 0 01 02 pCO2 > 70
pCO2 40
- >90% M 7690% M 5175% M 2650% M 25%
CO

A , A
( -
)
K -

A - , A M


M E
()

OO O
B 0 1 2 3 4

K A , - E , E , A
, , -


/ K A , - E , A
O , , -
-

K ( )
K - - N
( ) -


. 135

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

131135 126130 12111250 120


(mEq/L mmol/1) > 135 CNS,
3,13,5 2,63,0 2,12,5 2,0
(mEq/L mmol/1) > 3,5 ,
(mg/dL) < 116 116160 161250 251500 > 500
(mmol/dL) < 6,4 6,48,8 8,913,8 13,927,8 > 27,8
(mmol/L) > 3,6 3,13,6 2,33,0 1,72,2 < 1,7
..O. < 1,5 N 1,52,0 N 2,15,0 N > 5,0 N
(mg/dL) < 10,6 10,611,5 11,612,5 12,613,5 > 13,5
(mmol/L) < 2,64 2,642,87 2,883,12 3,133,37 > 3,37
(mg/L) > 8,4 8,47,8 7,77,0 6,96,1 6,0
(mmol/L) > 2,10 2,101,95 1,941,75 1,741,52 1,51
(mEq/L) > 1,4 1,41,2 1,10,9 0,80,6 0,5
(mmol/L) > 0,58 0,580,49 0,480,37 0,360,25 0,24
() M

..O: , N:

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

- , - , -
, - ,
, , -

/ A , A , A , K


- K A, - O
-


E E , ,
- -
- > 10

/ / K , A K > 50%
-

/ , A A A
-


M
() M
136 OY

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K Y , - A -


- E - , , K
/ ,

E A



M E
()

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

M , -
(-
)
/ PNS A A
-

M - A

K A, - B A -
-
,

K T


E
,

M E
()

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

(- M A M
)
( )
K - (O 24, )


( )
. 137

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K M , E

/ K


, .


A
M
()

OO O
0 1 2 3 4

K

< 5,0% 5,09,9% 10,019,9% 20,0%
< 5,0% 5,09,9% 10,019,9% 20,0%
E T
,
M O


N
-

- N

N
K , A A
(
)
M
()
138 OY

OO O
N / - 0 1 2 3 4

M , .. A, K
K E - M
.

K Y >100cc - X -
(TUR
)

- K A A > 2 M -
/ - 2 - < , -

K , - -
(
-
)
- K N

O M E
()
E..O. (> N) > 1 < 1,5 N > 1,53,0 N 3,16,0 N > 6,0 N
K 1 + 23 + 4+ N -
<0,3 g% 0,31,0 g% >1,0 g%
< 3 g/l 310 g/l >10 g/l
A M , + A -

A
M E

K M , K ,
- ,

,
-

GU K N
GU M E
()
. 139

2.

ECOG KARNOFSKI

0: O 100: ,
90:
1: , 80: , -

70: ,

2: , 60: ,
. 50:
50%

3: . 40: ,
50% 30: ,
O OO O
4: . . 20: .
O OO O
10:
0:

3.
T Cockcroft Gault (Clcr)

(SrCr) mg/dL (SrCr) mol/L

CLcr (mL/min) (140 )* ()* Clcr (mL/min) (0,85) (140 )* ()*


(72) (SrCr) (0,81) (SrCr)

CLcr (mL/min) (0,85) (140 )* ()* Clcr (mL/min) (0,85) (140 )* ()*
(72) (SrCr) (0,81) (SrCr)

*
** (> 30% ),
Clcr.

4. Devine

= 50 + (2,3 5 )
50 + (0,906 152,4 )
= 45,5 + (2,3 5 )
45,5 + (0,906 152,4 )
:
, = 90 , = 68
= 50 + (2,3) (6860) = 68,4

> 30% . -
(. 68,4 ) .
140 OY

5.

(%)
13
, , 8
10
28
34
4

6.
DUBOIS (BSA) (sqM)

BSAsqM = ( )0,725 ( )0,725 0,0077184

7.

OO

() ()
()

0 DCIS Paget (Tis) O () (N0) isN0M0


< 2 cm (T1) O () (N0) T1N0M0
> 2 cm < 5 cm (T2) O (+) (N1) T0 T1N1M0
T2N1 N2M0
> 5 cm (3) O (+) T0 T1N2M0
(N2) T2N2M0
T3N0-2M0
O : - T4NOOIOM0
/ TOOION3M0
(N3)
-
peau d oranze (T4)
V O O TOOIONOOIOM1

M:

T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 M1
N0 0 I IIA IIB IV
N1 IIA IIA IIB IV
N2 IV
N3 IV
M1 IV IV IV IV IV
. 141

Tx: , - 1:
1. ()
Tis: in situ 2.
T1: 3 cm 3.
4.

T2: : 2:
> 3 cm 1.
2.
3. - -
4. (
, )
5.
> 2 cm
6. - ( )
T3: :
7. -

8. -

9.
< 2 cm ,
10.

(O 2 8 2b, 2a)

3:
- 1.
2.
T4: : 3. - -
4. (
)
5.
6. - ( )
7. -
8. -
9.
10.
( )
11.
( 11 3, 3b)
0: M0:
1:

0 1 2 3 1
1 V
T2 IB IIB IIIA IIIB IV
T3 IIB IIIA IIIA IIIB IV
T4 IIIB IIIB IIIB IIIB IV
M1 IV IV IV IV
142 OY

Dukes

Tx: O Dukes A 100


T2N0M0
is: in situ ( ) Dukes B T3N0M0
T4N0M0
1: Dukes C OOION1M0 OOION2M0
2: Dukes C2 TOOION3M0
3: Dukes D TOOIONOOIOM1
Astler-Coller
(MAC)
O o MAC A 100

MAC B1 200
O MAC B2 300
4: 400

O

MAC B3 400
O (, , , , ) MAC C1 210 220

0: MAC C2 310
320
410
420
1: 13 MAC C3 410
2: 4 420
3:
MAC D TOOIONOOIOM1
0:
1:

* MAC: modified Astler-Coller

: :
a: ,
b: , Ia:
c: a b b:
c: a b -

. 143

: - b: a, -
/ - (< 2 cm)
c: (> 2 cm)
a: O , /
, -
.. IV: (
)

is 1 2 3 4

In situ < 2 cm 24 cm > 4 cm



In situ - -

In situ

In situ 02 cm 24 cm 46 cm -

, ,
/

In situ - -
- - ,
,

/

0:
1: , , < 3 cm
2: 2a 3,16,0 cm
2b:
3: 3a > 6,0 cm
3b:
3c:

0:
1:

1 2 3 4 1
0 IV IV
1 IV IV
2 IV IV IV IV IV
3 IV IV IV IV IV
1 IV IV IV IV IV
144 OY

:
:
: 3 cm
: /
IV:

Clark:

O 100%
85%

65%

IV 50%
V 15%

Breslow ( American Joint Committee on Cancer):


Ia: 0,75 mm
Ib: 0,751,5 mm
IIa: 1,54,0 mm
IIb: > 4,0 mm
III: 5
IV:

2: > 3 cm
1: /
2: , ,
3: ( )
4: , , 3: , , -
/

0:
1: < 3 cm 0:
1:

1 2 3 4 1
0 IV
1 IV
2 IV IV
3 IV IV IV IV IV
1 IV IV IV IV IV


1. Spilker B. Guide to clinical trials. Raven Press: 1991. What is a clinical trial?
2. Spriet A, Dypin-Spriet Th. Good practice of clinical drug trials. 4. National Cancer Institute. Understanding Clinical Trials.
Karger: 1992. 5. ICH Harmonised Tipartite Guideline. Guideline for Good Cli-
3. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 2000. nical Practice. 1996.
CH GCP

H
O -
, , .. .
, -
. - , -
-
, - -
,
- -
- (. O ICH -
. : O
O (International Conferen- ).
ce of Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice ICH GCP)
1.2. (Adverse Event)
-
, -
A,
, -
. , -
- .
O
, ..A., (
, , ), -
O (WHO). - -
() ,
() (.
. O ICH
- : O -
, ).
1.3. ( )
.
. .
1. OO
1.4.
1.1. (Adverse Drug Reaction ADR) O
-
, .
, -
1.5. [
- ()]
, . - -
,

145
146 OY

, , , -
O - / . O -
. .

1.6. 1.13. /
/ -
, , -
,
- , -
,
, - (. O ICH
(SOP), O ).
.
1.14.
1.7. -
- (.. ) -
.
.
1.8.
1.15. ( )
. , -
O
1.9.
.

. 1.16.
, -
1.10.
, -
.
-
. , , 1.17.
, - , -
, , , - , -
, - ,
-
. -
.
1.11. (CRF)
.
, , -
, 1.18.
,
-
. .
1.12. / 1.19.
O -
, - ,
/ .
/ -
- 1.20. (CRO)
/ , - (, -
, - )
. 147

,
-
. ,
.
1.21.
, , - 1.26.
, - ,
, -
. O (.. - , -
, , - , -
) -
, - ,
-
, - .
-
. 1.27.
(AE-IEC, Independant Ethical Commitee)
1.22. ( -
(- , , )
, , , - /
, , - / , -
), ,
,
, - -
,
. / -
, , ,
1.23. , -
, -
, - .
(. , , , -
. 8. -
). -
, -
1.24. O (GCP) O
, , - , O.
, , ,
, 1.28.

- / -
, ,
.
.
1.25. ,
(IDMC) ( -
, - .
, -
) 1.29.
-
, ,
- ,
148 OY

- ,
, / .
(CRO) -
, 1.36.
. (Investigators Brochure)
-
1.30. () , -
O (.
, 7. E ).
.
1.37.
1.31. (-IRB) -
, - ,
- -
, .
-
- 1.38.
,
-
, -
, , (SOP), O
. -
.
1.32. /
1.39.
- -
/
. , ,
.
1.33.
1.40.
, - -
, - ,
.
, ( -
) - 1.41.
O
- .

. 1.42. ( -
)
1.34. / -
- (A).
.
, - 1.43.
- (B. 1.52. ).
(. -
1.56. ). 1.44.
, -
1.35. / , ,
/ - . -
. 149

- 1.51.
,
, -
. O ICH GCP ,
. , -
-
1.45.
. -
( -
- ).
.
1.52.
1.46. (QA)
,
(.. , -
, - , , , -
, ,
() - ,
O (GCP) - ,
. -
1.47. (QC) , -
, ,
O -
, ,
-
,
, -
, -
-
).
.
1.48. 1.53.

, ,
, -
, . / .

1.49. 1.54.
O . O
ICH GCP , -
-
(. 1.29. E- . O -
). (..
). -
1.50. (SAE) - - -
(ADR) .
O , -
1.55. (SOP)
-
-
- .

- 1.56.
/ O
/ .
(. O ICH
: O - / -
). (..
150 OY

, , ) (. 1.62. ( )
1.34. ).
.
1.57.
2. OI APXE TH OHIA ICH GCP
- 2.1. O -
.
-
1.58.
O (GCP)
- .
, 2.2. , -
,
, -
/
. .
,
1.59. .
- 2.3. , -
. -
-
1.60. .
2.4. O -

(.. , -
.
- 2.5. O

) (. O ICH - .
: O - 2.6.
.) , -
/
1.61. / -
- ( / ).
2.7.


-
-
,
-
-
.
,
2.8.
. -
, , - , -
, ,
, - .
, 2.9.
. -
, , .
, , - 2.10. -
, , ,
, , , , -
. , -
. 151

. /
2.11. , - / /
- /
, .
, 3.1.3. /
- -
. , -
2.12. - / -
, - .
O 3.1.4. /
(GMP). -
-
.
2.13. .
- 3.1.5. / -
. -
4.8.10,
3. OYO EO O YO /
A OH OOOI ,
( / ) / .
3.1. 3.1.6.

3.1.1. / -

, - (. 4.8.12, 4.8.14), /
. /
- -
. -
3.1.2. / .
: /- / - 3.1.7.
, -
- -
, - (. 4.8.15), /
, - /
(.. ),
,
, - (..
, - ).
, 3.1.8. /
/ ,

-
/ , - . H -
. -
/ -
.
- 3.1.9. /
, , - -
, ,
:
/ , -

152 OY

- )
. .
. 3.3.2. O ,
.
3.2. , 3.3.3.
3.2.1. / .
, 3.3.4. O ,
.
3.3.5. H , -
, -
. / /
:
. . / /.
. 3.3.6. O
. , / -
. /
/ . .
/ , - 3.3.7. O
-
, , - ,
/ -
. , -

/ .
3.2.2. / (.. -
, - , ) (.
4.5.2).
, 3.3.8. O
O (GCP) - / :
. . ,
3.2.3. / -
(. 3.3.7, 4.5.2, 4.5.4).
, -
. -
,
/ -
.
(. 4.10.2).
3.2.4. , -
. -
/
.
/
.
.

3.2.5. O -
.
,
3.3.9. / -
/ -
/ ,
/ / . :
3.2.6. / . /
, .
. . / .
3.3.
. / -
.
/ ,
, 3.4.
: / -
3.3.1. O ( - (.. , -
. 153

, / 4.2.2. O -
, , - ,
) - -
3 - .
, 4.2.3. O -
. -
O , -
/ , -
.
. 4.2.4. O

4. EPEYNHTH , -
4.1. -
.
4.1.1. O
, - 4.3. -
,
. 4.3.1. ( , -
),
, -
- ( ) -
- .
/ - 4.3.2. -
- / -
, / / .
4.1.2. O -
, -
, - , -
, . O -
/ -
- , -
. ,
4.1.3. O .
O - 4.3.3. -

. ( -
4.1.4. O / -
- ).
. 4.3.4. -
4.1.5. O ,
, , -
- , -
. , -
-
4.2. .
4.2.1. O -
(.. ) 4.4. /
- 4.4.1. /
-
/ /
. , -
154 OY

, - . / /
, - .
(.. ) . , -
.
. . .
4.4.2. O /
/ - 4.6.
4.6.1. /
/ . - - /-
- / .
, / - 4.6.2. / , /
/ - /
-
.

4.4.3. /
-
/
, -
.
.
4.5. 4.6.3. O / / -
4.5.1. O / - -
- / ,
, -
,
/ / . O -
/ -
- -
, .
. , , / -
4.5.2. O - , ( )

- -
/ . O
/ ,
- -
-
- -
-
.
(.. ,
4.6.4. -
).
, (.
4.5.3. O
5.13.2 5.14.3)

- .
. 4.6.5. O -
4.5.4. O - -
, .
- 4.6.6. O
, / /
/ . - -
, - , -
, / - , -
: .
. 155

4.7.
-
O - , ,
( ) -
.
. , 4.8.5. O
- -
-
(.. , - (
) - )
. , -
-
4.8. / /
.
4.8.1. O 4.8.6.
, -
-
, -
O -
, -
. - ,
/ .
4.8.7. -
- -
. ,
4.8.2.

, -
.

. O -
- .
4.8.8. -
/ /
. - -
-
, ,
- -
. .
- 4.8.9. -
. ,
4.8.3. O -
-
.
.
4.8.4. -
, - -

, -
,
, ,
156 OY

. O (monitor), , /
,
,
-
. / ,
- ,
- -

-
- -
.
. . -
4.8.10. -
/
- , -
- . ,
- -
: .
. . . -
. O . , -
. O
. -
. O - .
, . (-) (-) -
. -
. . , ,
. .
. O ,
(
) . .
. . - . O /
- -
, .
. . -
. O .
. O
. .
. / - 4.8.11. -
-
. -
. ( -
) -
. -
. ( ) - .
. , -
. -
-

, -
, .
. 4.8.12. ( -
. 157

) - /
- / , -
,
(.. ), -
- . -
,
, -
, , - -
- ,
(. 4.8.10).
.
4.8.13. (.. 4.9.
- 4.9.1. O -
) - , , -
- -
- -
(CRF) .
, 4.9.2. -
4.8.14. (CRF), -
4.8.14. ,
-
, .
: 4.9.3. O -
. O -
(CRF) -
-

.
, ( )
. O -
-
.
(..
. -
). -
.
-
. .
(. 5.18.4, ). O
. / / -
-
. -
- . O
,
- -
, - (CRF),
. - -
, , -
, - . O
. -
4.8.15. , .
, 4.9.4. O / -
, -
, .
(. . 8)
- . O
, /
- -
/ .
158 OY

4.9.5. - , -
2 -

ICH - / .
- 4.11.2. / -
ICH 2
-
. - , -
, -
, -
.
. - 4.11.3.
-
/ - /
(. 5.5.12). (.. -
4.9.6.
).
-
/ . 4.12. -
4.9.7. O / , ,
(monitor), -
-
, /
, / -

, -
.

4.10. -
4.10.1. O - , -
/ . :
, 4.12.1. -
/ . ,
4.10.2. O , -
, / , -
(. 3.3.8) , , /
,
- /
/ - -
. .
4.11. 4.12.2.
4.11.1. - (. 5.21), -
, ,
, /
(..
) - / -
. O - .
- 4.12.3. / -
. O - / (. 3.1.2
- 3.3.9), -
, -
, /
, -
/ . -
- .
. 159

4.13. (-) (-)


, - , .
, . O - 5.2.4. ,
/ / O, -
- , -
. -
-
5. OTHPIKTH .
5.1. 5.3.
5.1.1. O - O -
- , -
- -
, - . -
, , (-)
() .
, O
. 5.4.
5.1.2. O 5.4.1. O -
, (.. ,
(. 1.21) ), ,
,
/ , -
(CRF) -

.
5.1.3. O .
, - 5.4.2. :
(.
. . 6), O ICH -
5.1.4. O - -
/ / ICH ,
.
, -
. 5.5. , -

5.2. O (CRO) 5.5.1. O -
5.2.1. ,
,
- , ,
, -
.
. O 5.5.2. O -
,
. , -
5.2.2. O -
, -
-
, . , -
5.2.3. O - .
-
160 OY

. .
5.5.3. 5.5.8.
/ - (..
- ,
, : ), -
. - 2 -
-

, , - .
5.5.9.
(.. ). , -
. - / -
. .
. - 5.5.10. O -
, -
, , -
- .
- 5.5.11.
(.. - 2 -
).
. - ICH
- -
. ICH
. 2
-
(. 4.1.5 4.9.3). . -
. , -
.
. ,
(.. .
5.5.12. O -
). / -
5.5.4. - -
, - ,
(. 4.9.5).
.
5.5.5. O 5.6.
- 5.6.1. O
(. 1.58), - / .
- , -
. ,
5.5.6. O (. 4.1, 4.2),
- . -
(. 8. - / -
- -
). ,
5.5.7. O / .
5.6.2. -
/
/ -
- / , -
. 161

- 5.9. O
, / -
. -
5.6.3. O / .
/ :
5.10. /
. O
, -
, ( , -
/ -
)
/.
, /
.
(
.
), . -
. ,
/ -
(. 4.1.4).
. .
-
/ (. . 8), - 5.11. /
/ - 5.11.1. O
(. 4.9.4, / :
4.9.5 5.5.12). . / -
O / - / .
- . / -
, -
. O
.
5.7. - . / /
, ,
, -
, -
. -
, -
5.8. -
-
-
5.8.1.
/ .
,
5.11.2. / /
-
-
/ ( -
, -
) , -
, -
/ . /
5.8.2. , -
/ -
, -
- / -
, /.
. 5.11.3. O
5.8.3. - /
, - /
- -
. / .
162 OY

5.12. 5.13.5. -
5.12.1. -
-
- , -
/ (.. ,
, - , ),
, - ,
, -
. ,
5.12.2. O - -
, -
.
(. 7.
5.14.
).

5.13. , , - 5.14.1. O -
/
5.13.1. O .
( 5.14.2. O -
- / ,
, ) -
, (.. / /
).
O (GMP) 5.14.3. O -
, , -
, , /
.
- -
. . O
5.13.2. O - -
- , , , ,
, (.. - -
), , - ( -
,
, . O -
-
[.. (monitors), - ).
, , ] 5.14.4. O :
. . -
5.13.3. - (-).
, . -
, , , -
-
. (. 8. -
5.13.4. ).
- .
,
, - (.. -
, -
- ).
. .
. 163

- / , /
. AE ( ) .
5.14.5. O : 5.17.2.
. -
O-
. ICH
. - : O -
, .
, - 5.17.3. O -
, -
. - , -
, .
-
, 5.18.
- 5.18.1. . O
, :
.
. .
. ,
5.15.

5.15.1. O - .
- . -
/ / ,
O -
/ , - .
, / - 5.18.2. [
- (monitors)]
. . O -
5.15.2. O .
. O -
- /
, , , -
/ - . -
.
. . O -
5.16. , ,
5.16.1. O -
-
. , -
5.16.2. O , O -
/ - .
5.18.3. . O -
-
, . O -
/ - -
/ . . -
, ,
5.17. , , , -
5.17.1. O , -
, . -
, , .
164 OY

.
- .
, - -
- , -
, ,

O . .
- .
- .
. . -
5.18.4. . O , - , ,
,
-
,
, - /
: -
. .
. . -
. - .
(. 4.1, 4.2, 5.6) - . -
- .
, , - .
, , -
, .
- . -
. , ,
. : -
i. , , -
- , .
. .
ii. - -
, (CRF)
, - ,
. . O
iii. - :
, , - i. -
- -
. (CRF)
iv. , - .
- ii. /
. -
v. -
iii. , -
- -
- o
. (CRF).
. iv. CRF -
- , -
, .
. .
- v.
. 165

- .
CRF. . O
.
CRF, - -
. O - .
-
, - 5.19.
, ( ) -
- ,
- :
5.19.1. O . O -
CRF . - , -
.
. - ,
-
O - , -
, , / , - , O -
,
O ICH .
: O- 5.19.2. H
. . O ,
. - /
(. 8. , .
). . O
. , -
, , O - ,
.
.
, - 5.19.3. O
. . O -
5.18.5. . O / -

- -
, ,
- .
. . -
5.18.6. -
. O -
- ()
, ,
. ,
. O - -
, , .
, . O
. .
. O .
,
, - . O
/ ,
, , -
/ - ,
166 OY

O 5.23.1. -
. -
. , -
- , ,
. / / .
5.23.2.
5.20.
, -
5.20.1. , -
, O . -
/ , -
/ -
- .
, 5.23.3.
. -
5.20.2. / - .
/ 5.23.4.
/ , ,
,
/ . - -
/ CRFs.
, 5.23.5. -
. .
5.21. -
6. PTOKOO TH KINIKH OKIMH KAI

TPOOOIHEI TOY PTOKOOY
, -
- -
/ - -
. / .

-
/ , ,
. , -
, -
5.22. / .
, -
6.1.

- 6.1.1. O , -
, - .
.
- .
6.1.2.
O ICH - ( ).
. (: 6.1.3. -
O ICH -
-
.
). 6.1.4. , ,
--
5.23. , ( --
, , ).
: 6.1.5. -
. 167

, - 6.4.3. ,
/ ,
. :
6.1.6. , , i.
( - ii. .
), 6.4.4. ,
() -
( - . -
). , -
6.1.7. O .
/ / - 6.4.5. -
.
, -
6.2. -
6.2.1. - (follow-up), .
(-). 6.4.6. -
6.2.2. ,
, - .
, - 6.4.7.
. ,
6.2.3. , -
, , . .
6.2.4. , 6.4.8.
, -
. .
6.2.5. 6.4.9. -
, O -
. (CRF) (.. -
6.2.6. . )
6.2.7. .

. 6.5.
6.5.1. .
6.3. 6.5.2. .
6.5.3. (..
.
) :
6.4. i.
/ .
- ii. O -
.
: .
6.4.1. iii. -
( ), .
. iv. T
6.4.2. / - -
(.. , - / .
, -
) - 6.6.
, - 6.6.1. , -
. ,
168 OY

, , / - ).
, - 6.9.7. -
(..
/ , -
/ - , ,
. ).
6.6.2. / -
( - 6.10. /
) / .
6.6.3. - O -
.
/ ,
6.7. , / -
6.7.1. . , -
6.7.2. , - , -
- / .
.
6.11.
6.8. 6.12.
6.8.1. .
6.8.2. , - .
.
6.8.3. , - 6.13.
-
. 6.14. O
6.8.4. O
, -
-
.
.
6.15.
6.9.
, -
6.9.1.
.
,
- 6.16.
.
(:
6.9.2. O -
/ , -
, . -


O ICH -
-
).
.
,
7. ENHMEPTIKO YAIO IA
( ) TON EPEYNHTH
.
6.9.3. . 7.1.
6.9.4. .
6.9.5. ,
. ,
6.9.6. - . O
(-
-

/ , -
. 169

, , -
/ , -
.
, -
/ -
. O - .
, , - -
, -
, .
-,
- .
-
.
- , -
, - , -
- , -
- -
. .
-
7.2.
-
. :
7.2.1. .
. ,
(.. ,
- -
, ,
- )
. , - . -
, - -
-
, . -
, 7.4. 1.
- 7.2.2. . O -
.
, , / -
(.. ), -
-
. - / .
-
, - 7.3.
, -
. , -
, -
. , :
O - 7.3.1. . -
, - 7.5. 2.
, , 7.3.2. . ( -
/ / , - 2 )
- , ,
. , , , -
170 OY

, ,
, -
-
.
7.3.3. .
, -
( - :
, ) - 1.
, , - .
2.
(.. .
), - 3. .
4. .
, - 5. .
. , 6. .
-
/ , ,
. .
7.3.4. ,
. - , -
- -
( /
,
)

, -
. , -
.


(.. -
, -
).
, -
-
, -

, .
. ,
.
/ mg/kg.
. . . -
7.3.5. . . -
- ,
, , - , -
. -
. -

, - (.. ,
- ),
(..
.
O , - ).
, , .
/ : . -

-
, .. milligram / kilogram . -
(mg/kg)
. 171

- -
).
. .
-
. , , -
. . -
- (
, - , ) -
, ,
: ( / ). H -
.
-
,
(.. -
)

(). . -
7.3.6. . . -
(

(-) , ).
, / -
, , - -
, , - .
.
, -
. ,

-
, - .
-
, ,
. .
. - . . -
.
-

, . -
, :
( -
, , , (.. , ,
, ). -
)
(- -
, , / ), - / -
-
(, / .
) 7.3.7.
(.. .
)
(.. - -
172 OY

- 4. , -
, -
. - 5.
- 5.1.
5.2. -
-
. 5.3.
, 6.
6.1. -
.
6.2.
. 6.3.
7.
O
:


, -

, -


.
. - ( ).
, ,
, , 8. AAPAITHTA EPAA IA TH IEAH
. MIA KINIKH OKIMH
8.1.

,
, - ,
- -
. .
7.4. 1
, -
O
- (GCP) -
(). .
: -
: . -
: -
O: , ( ) / -
( -
): , -
: .
:
:
: -
:
.
7.5. 2

.
(). ,
() : 1.
()
1. (8.2), 2.
2. (8.3), 3. -
3. (8.4).
. 173

)
/ .
-
. - -
- -
. .
O -
8.2.
/ -
. -
,
( / , .

:
/

8.2.1.
-


8.2.2.
( )
,
(CRF)
8.2.3.

-
(-
-
)
O -

( -
), -

-
( -
)
8.2.4. O
/

8.2.5. ( -
)


174 OY

8.2.6.
,
..:
/ -

/ - (
)
(CRO)

(CRO)
/
( )
8.2.7. / -
/ - /
: / -
- .

CRF ( )


O -


( )

( )
O
/ -

8.2.8. - (
/ / )
O
8.2.9. / - ( (
/ ) )
( )



8.2.10. /

/

8.2.11. -
/ -
/ -
/
/ -

. 175

8.2.12. / / - (
/ - )


-
/

(
)
8.2.13.
-


8.2.14. O

- , ,
(
-
)
8.2.15.
,
-

. -

, -

8.2.16. , -
-
-

8.2.17. (
-
- )
,


8.2.18. O - - (

)
8.2.19. -
( -
8.2.20)
8.2.20.


( -
8.2.19)
176 OY

8.3. - ,
,
.
-

:
/

8.3.1.

,

8.3.2. O :
/

(CRF)


O
-



( )
8.3.3. / -
/ / -
: /
- / .

:


O



( -
)
O
/


(. 3.1.4)
8.3.4. / / - - (
)
, -
:
-

. 177

8.3.5.
-
(. 8.2.10)
8.3.6. -
/
- -
/ / - (. 8.2.11)
/ -

8.3.7. / (
/ - )
/ (. 8.2.12)



/
( )
8.3.8. -

(. 8.2.15)
8.3.9.
-
(. 8.2.16)
8.3.10. /


8.3.11. -

: ,
,
, -


8.3.12. -
O


. ,
(. 8.2.3)
8.3.13.
(Source documents) -

.

,

178 OY

8.3.14. -
, - () ()


8.3.15. ,
- () ()
(CRF) CRF, -

8.3.16. -



4.11
8.3.17. - / (
/ ( ( ) )
) /
/ - -
5.17 4.11.1
-
4.11.2
5.16.2
8.3.18. -
-
5.16.2
8.3.19. (
/ / 4.10 )
5.17.3
8.3.20. (
)

8.3.21. /



.
/

8.3.22. -

8.3.23. - N -


8.3.24.


/ CRFs
. 179

8.3.25. -
/ , -
( )

8.4. , 8.2
8.3, -
.

:
/

8.4.1.

.


,
,


8.4.2. (
- )
-

8.4.3. O - -
- ,


follow-up. O
-


8.4.4. ( - -
)
8.4.5. -


-


8.4.6. ,
-

180 OY

8.4.7. -
/ /

( ) (. 4.13)
8.4.8. (
(. 5.22) )

OHIA 2001/20/EK TOY EYPAKOY -


KOINOBOYIOY -
O 2001/20/ , -
, 4 2001, -
, , -
- -
.
. (3) -
[ . L 121 01/05/2001, -
. 0034-0044] . -

: .
O EYPAKO KOINOBOYIO KAI TO YMBOY- , -
IO TH EYPAKH ENH, :
, . -
95, 1, - -
O 2, - , -
251 -
3, : ,
(1) 65/65/EOK , . -
26 1965, ,
, - , -
4, -
. -
-
, ,

. 75/317/O -
, 20 1975, - . ,
, -
,
- . ,
5,
. , -
(2) O . O -
-
, -
.
, , -
, 1996. -
- .

181
182 OY

(4) O
, .. -
, .., .
- (8) -
. -
, - , -
-

. .
(9) , ,
, - -
, , -
.
(5) .

, -
, / .
. (10) O ,
(6)
, - , , -
, -
. - . O -

-
, ,
. -
(7) -

(OK) . 2309/93 , 22 - . -
1993,
-
-
- -
6, - -
- .
, , (11)
, -
, , -
O -
(
O), - .
-
. .
(12) O
- .
(13) -
. .
(14) -
. - -
,
. 183

. OYA OHIA:

1.
- 1. -
, , -
,
65/65/EOK,
- 1
75/319/EOK 91/356/EOK, 65/65/EOK,
, .
.
. 2. -
- -
- , -
- , ,
-
. -


91/356/EOK.
,
(15)
,
, -
.

3. O
, -

-
, , -
. 21 2,
(16) O
, , . -
- .
- 4. ,
, - , -
- ,
. .
(17)
95/46/EOK - 2. O
, 24 O 1995, ) :
-
- , /

7. / -
(18) -
- / ,
, ,
(- ,
), - / -
. .
(19) - -
-
1999/468/EOK , 28 - ,
1999, ) :
-
8. , , -
184 OY

. , -
,
/ ) : , -
) : , -
, - , , -
, , -
. -
,
, ,
, , . -
, -
-
. - -
-
- ) : ,
, -
) : -
(>ISO_1>pla- , -
cebo) >ISO_7> -
,
, -
, - ,
( ) ,
- -
- ,
-
) : ,
) : , , - , , , , -
, -
/ ,
) : - , -
- -
, / -
- -
. O - ,
-
. - ) :
,
- ,

) : - ) : -
- ,
,
) -
: ,
) : , ,
, , , - , -
. O ,
, -

) : ) :
. 185

- , -
( , - , ,
. -
, - ,
, - ,
,
). ,
) , -
3. ,
1. , -
- ,
, - ) -
-
- .
. , 3. -
, -
, -
- , ,
. .
2. , - 4. O
: .
) -
- 4.
, - ,
. - , :
, - )
/ . -


, , -
,
, ) -
) , , -
- , ,
, - ,
- ) , -

, , -

- , ,
, ,
, )
) ,
- ) -
,
, - -
-
95/46/, -
) , -
- .
,
186 OY


, -
, ,
) - ,
O, ) ,
) , ,
, , -
,
,
, - ,
- ) -
,
) -

, , -
-
, ,
) )
. ,
) -
5. - -

.
,
- 6.
. - 1.
,
, .
, - 2.
, , :
) - .
3. , -
- :
, )
, ,
) - )
, ,
, - 3 2 ), -
, ,
) , ,
) ,
, )
,
) ,
, , ) ,
, ) -
) ,
, ,
) -
-

. 187

3, .
)

, , ,
)
, .
) -
- 8.
,
, , -
) . -
4. ,
- ,
-
-
9
.
3 ), ) ) -
.
9.

, , 1. ,
O. -
5. 60 .
O ,
, - -
, -
. -
6. - . O

, , .
. 2. -
5 - ,
.
7. 60
5 , .
- 3. -
-
- , , ,
. - -
30 . 2, -
90 .
90 , - , -
,
.
. - 4.
- 2 -
.
60 .
7. -
60 , -
, - . -
,
, ,
188 OY

. -
O , -
, ,
- ) -
6,
30 . 10 ) -
90 ,
90 ) .
-
10.
. -
:
. )
5. , 6, - .
-
-
65/65/ -
OK - -
(EOK) . 2309/93, , ,
- -
, -
(-) (-) (-)
-
6 9.
. -
6. - 3 6 -
- 7, -
, , - 35
,
.
. - ,
- .
-
.
7.
, , 90/219/EOK ,
, 23 1990, -
- . ,
9 90/220/EOK - -
, 23 1990, -
, -
10.
8. - ) )
: ,
) - -
2,
- , -
- , ,
, - ,
, - -
. 189

. O 9 -
-
, -
- ,
.
) 90 - ,
,
, / ,
, - .
. -
, ,
15 - , O -
. -
, -
11. .
2.
1. , -
-
,
-
, -
,
, O-

: -
) . -
2 9, ,
) , .
3 9,
) 13.
) 10,
) ,
1. ,
)
-
)
.
.
, ,
2. ,
,
O ,
-

21, -
-
2.

2.
.
3. , , - 1

23
, - 75/319/EOK ,
O, 20 1975, -
,
. 11
-
. 3 -
.
12. 3.
1. -
- 21 75/319/EOK,
2
190 OY

, , 319/EOK.
25 ), )
, , : ),
) ,
, -
-
.
91/356/EOK , 13 4.
1991, -

- -
12,
- -
9
2 , , 5
) .
, 5. ,
,
- , -
, -
91/356/EOK , -
21 75/319/EOK,
,


23 24 , -

-
9 2 -
.
,
)
14.

,
-
, -
- , ,
, O-
, - O -
, ,
19 75/319/EOK.
O
-
9 2 - :
. -
O
- ,
, -
65/65/EOK
-
- 75/319/EOK
13 . O - -
21 - -
2 - -
19 75/ .
. 191

15. -

-
1.
21 2.
,
, 16.
, : 1. O
, ,
, -
-
/ - . -
. , . -
O , ,
,
O, - .
- 2. /
. O -
O,
(EOK) . , ,
2309/93 . - , -
.
. 3. -
2. - ,
. - -
, - .
. - 4. O -
,

, O-
. -
.
-
3. , O-
, .
, (EOK)
. 2309/93 , -
17. -
,

, -
, 1.
- ) O
.
4. - ,
, , , -

, ,
, -
/ , 7
/ -
. - , -
, . -
5. O 8 .
, ) -
, - -
, , -
192 OY

- 20. --
, 15 -
- O
.
) - 21 -
2.

. 21.
) O 1.
.
2. ( ),
, 2 75/318/EOK.
, 2. -
, 5 7
- 1999/ 468/, -
, 8 .
. 5 -
3. 6 1999/468/,
.
) , -
3. .
-
, , 22.
1. ,
, - 1 2003, ,
11 1, ,
, , -
O . .
) O - -
- 1 2004.
O. O ,
, -
18. O -
, O, - . O -
, - .
, - 2. -
-
, .
23.
.
-
19. -
.
-
. 24.
.
. , 4 2001.
O
, , ,
- >ISO_1>N. Fontaine
. >ISO_7>
O
. >ISO_1>B. Rosengren
. 193

1. >ISO_7>EE>ISO_1>C 306 >ISO_7> 8.10.1997, . 9 6. >ISO_1>L 214 >ISO_7> 24.8.1993, . 1


>ISO_1>C 161 >ISO_7> 8.6.1999, . 5. () . 649/98
2. >SO_1>C 95 >ISO_7> 30.3.1998, . 1. ( >ISO_1>L 88 >ISO_7> 24.3.1998, .
3. 17 7).
1998 ( >ISO_1>C 379 >ISO_7> 7.12.1998, . 27), 7. >ISO_1>L 281 >ISO_7> 23.11.1995, . 31.
20 2000 ( 8. >ISO_1>L 184 >ISO_7> 17.7.1999, . 23.
>ISO_1>C 300 >ISO_7> 20.10.2000, . 32) - 9. >ISO_1>L 117 >ISO_7> 8.5.1990, . 1
12 2000 98/81/ (
( ). - >ISO_1>L 330>ISO_7> 5.12.1998, . 13).
26 2001. 10. >ISO_1>L 117 >ISO_7> 8.5.1990, . 15
4. 22 9.2.1965, . 1/65 - 97/35/
93/39/O ( >ISO_1>L 214 ( >ISO_1>L 169 >ISO_7> 27.6.1997, .
>ISO_7> 24.8.1993, . 22). 72).
5. >ISO_1>L 147 >ISO_7 9.6.1975, . 1 11. >ISO_1>L 147 >ISO_7> 9.6.1975, . 13
1999/83/ 93/39/
( >ISO_1>L 243 >ISO_7> 15.9.1999, . ( >ISO_1>L 214 >ISO_7> 24.8.1993, . 22).
9). 12. >ISO_1>L 193 >ISO_7> 17.7.1991, . 30.

. . , . .

, -
- ,
- , , -
-
. ,
,
. .
-
OH H E

Louis Pasteur, -
.
, - . O
- -
.
- ,
. O -
. - -
, -
, -
.
, -
,
, - ,

, . -
O -
.
- -
, -
. , .
-
in 1.
vitro, - ,
- . -
, - -
, . , - . -

- , , , -
( - ,
). - -
-

195
196 OY

K RAS
Bcr-Abl
Grb2 SOS
MYC
Raf-1

JAKs CRKL PI3 /Akt K


MEK MAP
BCL-2
CBL (p120CBL) ERK

STATs
A

K


M

A K

E 1. BCR-ABL. -
, ABL . -
, .

, in vi- , ,
tro, , , ,
, , -
, , - ,
. : .

OH H E
, -
- .
. -
(signal
- transduction).
, - , -
, -
- , -
. , -
- . -

, - ,
, .
. -
, -
, - .
O
,
, . - . O


, . ,
. 197

, , ,
-
, - -
.
.
- . -
- . ,
, , ,
, -
- , -
. - .
, -
, , -
, -
, . O - ,
.
-
- .
. -
, -
,
- . -
, -
:
,
, , -
In vitro ,
In vivo .

. , -
, :
OH OOY OO 1.
, - .
- 2.
- .
. 3. -
, -
,
, .
. -
, - O Y AO
, -
. O . O

- , ,
. - (antisen-
- se) .
.
-
, - --
, - ,
198 OY

,
, ( , -
) . O ,
(signal transduction .
inhibitors STI) .
in vitro -
- -
, -
1,2,3. . -
-
. in vivo
O - , -
.
. -
(mAb) (bioavailabili-
ty, -
, ), -
. - (pharmacokinetic,
. -
() , , -
- ), (pharmaco-
dynamic, -
(Natural Killers cells , -
NK), - ) . -
- -
4,5,6. .
, -
(antisense) , -
- ,
- , , , ,
mRNA. - , , -
- .
DNA RNA, -
- E OE
-7,8,9. O
-
. -
,
in vitro .
.
-
, , -
,
, - -
. -
. O -
, -
, - . , 3%
. H... .
, - O :
, .
. 199

(1530) -
, -
- () -
. O (gastrointestinal stromal
tumors GIST), -
(.. ), - .
, ,
,
. O - .
-
, , - (Ph),
-
. , BCR-ABL.
. ,
100 . - bcr-abl, -
9 2210. O -
, , - (protein tyrosine kinase PTK) -
, - (Pi)
(ATP) , -
. - . -
-
, -
. , , -
. -
- -
. .
. BCR-ABL -
100 1.000 . - . -
, BCR-ABL,
,
95% , -
(. 1). imatinib
. (Glivec)
IV. - . Glivec ATP. -
ATP
- ( BCR-ABL), -
.
I, II III .
, -
. BCR-
ABL,
OEOI APAONTE O OYO . -
OH I 3.000
- -
- BCR-ABL
. . -

STI571: ENA EIIKO ANATOEA TH MH Y- ,
IOOIKH METAH HMATO (Glivec)
- BCR-ABL
Glivec STI571 (.
200 OY

-H
PAP
H H N
N N N N

N O CH3SO3H

E (3-)

E 2. STI571. O ATP
(PAP). ATP
ATP. (3-) -
. -
Ser/Thr Tyr.

2). - OOA I
, - O IO RASTUZUMAB
, - -
. O > -
300 mg 31
. Herceptin. Herceptin (Trastuzumab) -
- (recombinant DNA-derived humanized) -
O - ,
... (FDA) - (Kd = 5
. nM) -
1.100 2 (HER2) .
Glivec - (INF-) - HER2 IgG1 kappa
(cytosine arabinoside Ara-C), (human framework regions)
. O - 4D5.
HER2 c-erbB2 -
INF-.
Glivec 185-kDa,
, - .
c-kit, -
R2
90% 11. O . -
40 HER2 -
Glivec, -
400 600 mg 12. .
69% - -
53% , .
- 2530% -
. 147 HER2.
400600 mg 24 . Herceptin -
HER2
38% (400 mg 33% 600 mg 43%). . -
Glivec ,
2002 GISTs.
. 201

. HER2 Herceptin 2 mg/kg. -


. (ORR, -
),
Herceptin . , 14%, 2%
(1975) in vitro 12% .
. - -
HER2 - . -
(1985). . Herceptin
HER2 -
2530% - .
(1987) - -
Genentech - Herceptin -
HER2.
Herceptin HER2
(ADCC). In vitro - .
Herceptin ADCC - Herceptin -
HER2 - 25,1 -
, 20,3 -
HER2. n vitro , 24%. -
Herceptin -
-
-
HER2.
29% 45%, Her-

ceptin ( 55%). O
. -
4,5 -
10 500 mg
7,2 Herceptin
-
. -
. Herceptin
Herceptin 8,3
, ,
5,8, .
(469 ),
Herceptin
(open-label single agent)
(222 ). , 14% 222
, ,
HER2. O -
50% .
2+ 3+ ( 0 3+) - -
. , Herceptin -
, -

, HER2 -
. - .
, - 10.000 800
Herceptin ..., .
-
. Herceptin Herceptin
(open-label, single-arm) HER2 , -
HER2 - .
Herceptin ,
- HER2
. O - FDA
4 mg/kg, - 199813.
202 OY

OA (ANTISENSE) OOOO-
I I O IO ANGIOZY- -
ME .
RNA -
. . O VEGF
- .
-
. - ,
mRNA - -
. - -
mRNA .
mRNA - ( VEGF Va-
- scular Permeability Factor), VEGF -
. - (fibrin) -
siRNA (small .
interfering RNA), VEGF -
mRNA, -
. - , -

. .
, - -
-
. -
O [Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RPI) . -
Chiron Corporation] -
ngiozyme -
. O .
Angiozyme -
. .
VEGF, -
mRNA -,
- .

-
siRNA. -
. -
siRNA -
-
.

siRNA
, -

- , 14,15.
. -
- , . 28
siRNA
ngiozyme
, . 29 . n-
Angiozyme - giozyme
, - . 25%
, Angiozyme 6
. . -
. -
-
- . O -
. O VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor)
. 203

..., . -
Angiozyme -
75 . 56%
Angiozyme - (Estrogen Receptor positive
. ER+) 50% ER--
45 (R). ER+
. 80%.
45 12 .
VEGFR-1 -
,
43 ngiozyme. -
, - .
Angiozyme, [4,4-(1H-1,2,4--)
Angiozyme - ], , -
IV - . -
16. . -

OI P450 A 450 -
OO, OO, A (. 3).
O
-
. - . -
-
, . In vitro -
. 200
, , in vivo 10.000
. , 1030 -
70% - -
- , fadrozole17 , -
, ,

E 3. NC CN
450
- DNA
mRNAs
.

proMMOs/MMPs
204 OY

,
. -
/ -
, - -
, - . O -
, - -
, . 8 40 (20%)
, 2,5 mg -
. - . -
, - ,
10.500 - .
, - O 0,5 mg, 2,5 mg
. .
n vitro , , 60%
1/5 -
- .
. in vitro -
- , - -
- , 2,5
, mg Tamoxifen 20 mg 907
. - ( IIIB) -

, - . -

18.
- 9,4 6,0 Tamoxifen.

. Tamoxifen -
, - (30% 20%),
0,1 mg 5 mg 6 (49% 38%) -
/ 181 - (9,1 5,7).


1. Klohs WD, Fry DW, Kraker AJ. Inhibitors of tyrosine kinase. 8. James HA, Gibson I. The therapeutic potential of ribozymes.
Curr Opin Oncol 1997; 9(6): 562-568. Blood 1998; 91(2): 371-382.
2. Levitt ML, Koty PP. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in preclinical 9. Dobra K, Andang M, Syrokou A, Karamanos NK, Hjerpe A.
development. Invest New Drugs 1999; 17(3): 213-226. Differentiation of mesothelioma cells is infuenced by the ex-
3. Roussidis AE, Karamanos NK. Inhibition of receptor tyrosine pression of proteoglycans. Exp Cell Res 2000; 258(1): 12-22.
kinase-based signal transduction as specific target for cancer 10. Rowly DA. A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in
treatment. In Vivo 2002; 16: 459-470. chronic myelogenous leukemia identified by quinacrine fluo-
4. Fan Z, Mendelsohn J. Therapeutic application of anti-growth rescence and Giesma staining. Nature 1973; 243: 290-293.
factor receptor antibodies. Curr Opin Oncol 1998; 10(1): 67- 11. Joensuu H, Dimitrijivic S. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib
73. (STI571) as an anticancer agent for solid tumours. Ann Med
5. Farah RA, Clinchy B, Herrera L, Vitetta ES. The develop- 2001; 33(7): 451-455.
ment of monoclonal antibodies for the therapy of cancer. Crit 12. van Oosterom AT, Judson I, Verweij J, Stroobants S, Donato
Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 1998; 8(3-4): 321-356. di Paola E, Dimitrijevic S, Martens M, Webb A, Sciot R, Van
6. Hudson PJ, Souriau C. Recombinant antibodies for cancer Glabbeke M, Silberman S, Nielsen OS. Safety and efficacy of
diagnosis and therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2001; 1(5): 845- imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tu-
855. mours: a phase I study. Lancet 2001; 358: 1421-1423.
7. Gewirtz AM, Sokol DL, Ratajczak MZ. Nucleic acid thera- 13. Harries M, Smith I. The development and clinical use of tras-
peutics: state of the art and future prospects. Blood 1998; 92 tuzumab (Herceptin). Endocr Relat Cancer 2002; 9(2):75-85.
(3): 712-736. 14. Sandberg JA, Parker VP, Blanchard KS, Sweedler D, Powell
. 205

JA, Kachensky A, Bellon L, Usman N, Rossing T, Borden E, tor. Curr Oncol Rep 2001; 3(2): 141-6.
Blatt LM. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of an antiangio- 17. Miller WR, Anderson TJ, Dixon JM. Anti-tumor effects of le-
genic ribozyme (ANGIOZYME) in healthy volunteers. J Clin trozole. Cancer Invest 2002; 20 Suppl 2: 15-21.
Pharmacol 2000a; 40(12 Pt 2): 1462-1469. 18. Mitropoulou TN, Tzanakakis GN, Kletsas D, Kalofonos HP,
15. Sandberg JA, Sproul CD, Blanchard KS, Bellon L, Sweedler Karamanos NK. Letrozole as a potent inhibitor of cell prolife-
D, Powell JA, Caputo FA, Kornbrust DJ, Parker VP, Parry TJ, ration and expression of metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-
Blatt LM. Acute toxicology and pharmacokinetic assessment 9) by human epithelial breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer 2003;
of a ribozyme (ANGIOZYME) targeting vascular endothelial 104: 155-160.
growth factor receptor mRNA in the cynomolgus monkey. An-
tisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev 2000b; 10(3): 153-162. clinical trials:
16. Weng DE, Usman N. Angiozyme: a novel angiogenesis inhibi- http://www.centerwatch.com/
II
E


. ............................................................................................................ 209

(Proteomics) (Genomics)
S. Murray, . ................................................................................................ 227


.

H
Hpa I
-
5' G T T A A C 3

. O
3' C A A T T C 5'

.
CUT
-
Eco RI

, - 5' G A A T T C 3'
1.
3' C T T A A C 5'

CUT
-
. -
Hind III

, - 5' A A G C T T 3'
(HUGO) ,
- 3' T T C G A A 5'
. CUT

-
- 5' C T G C A G 3'
.
3' G A C G T C 5'
EOOA OOY
CUT Rst I
, -
, , 1. O
DNA . -
. O
- .
DNA, 4 8 . O DNA
, , - .
(
). , (.
- 2).
.
(
DNA )
(. 1). O (. 2). DNA
. (ligation)
DNA - DNA.

209
210 OY

TAAT DNA (restriction map) (. 3). -


3'
5' -
ATAT -
3'
5'
3' + 5' . -
T T AA AATT DNA ,
3'
5' -
T T AA . O
3'
5' DNA ,

-
AATT .
5' 3'
3'
T T AA
5' O
TAAT
. , -
3'
5'
ATAT , -
+ 3'
5' -
T T AA . -
3'
5' ,
. O
2.
DNA . DNA DNA -
-
, . RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism). -
DNA , -
co R1,
-
. (. 4).
O RFLP
- ,
DNA -
(restriction sites). -
Southern (Southern lot), DNA (-
(restriction fragments). - )
, - DNA
, - (. 5).

DNA 10 kb
:
.

.




A B
2kb 2 kb 3kb
3kb 8 kb 7kb
5kb 2kb 5kb 3kb
10kb
= 10 kb = 10 kb = 10 kb

3. . ,
, .
. 211

,
DNA +

, +

RFLP ( )
DNA

,

4. DNA (RFLP).
. DNA, , 3 , -
DNA. DNA DNA -
Southern Blotting. . , -
, . O
DNA RFLP. . O DNA, -
.



Southern Blotting
DNA
3m ( 3)

3p ( 3)


3m

RFLP DNA

3p

3m

3p
DNA



DNA
RFLP

5. RFLP Southern Blotting.


3 .

E I DNA OI -
(DNA SEQUENCING)
DNA - .
: . ,
in vitro DNA H EOO (EOO SANGER)
- , DNA -
- in vitro -
DNA. DNA ,
212 OY

NH2 , -
N
DNA .
N
(ddNTPs) (.
6) 3O,
N N
. -
DNA,
5' O
H2O3P O CH2 .
H H 1' 7 -
H H dNTPs
H H
ddATP,
E 6. 5- - . DNA DNA


(dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP) C (ddATP)
A GTC G A
TA T G TC
TA T C G A T
A A T TC A
T
GT C C A T
G C
G
-
DNA
DNA
DNA
5' GCTACCTGCATGGA
3' CGATGGACGTACCTCTGAAGCG 5'
DNA

5' GCATATGTCAGTCCAG 3'


DNA
CGTATACAGTCAGGTC

3' CGTATACAGTCAGGTC 5' DNA


5' GCAT 3' + DNA
+ dATP
dTTP
dCTP
dGTP

+ ddATP + ddTTP + ddCTP + ddGTP

GCAT A GCAT AT GCAT ATGTC GCAT ATG


GCAT ATGTCA GCAT ATGT GCAT ATGTCAGTC GCAT ATGTCAG
GCAT ATGTCAGTCCA GCAT ATGTCAGT GCAT ATGTCAGTCC GCAT ATGTCAGTCCAG

3'
G
A
C
C
T
G
A
C
T
G
T
A 5'
A T C G

7. O DNA Sanger.
. 213

DNA . - ern Blotting),


DNA - (
, - -
DNA. ).
RNA DNA (Blotting)
, - .
. -
( ) - -
DNA. - DNA
- . O DNA, -
ddNTPs, RNA DNA -
. - , .
- DNA -
- -
. - ,
DNA -
5 3, DNA . Southern -
. DNA
DNA .
E OY O OE -
(SOUTHERN NORTHERN BLOTTING) .
Southern Blotting -
DNA RNA - -
Southern (Southern Blotting) . -
Northern (Northern Blotting) (. 8). (PCR), -
RNA (Northern Blotting) - , -
DNA
(South- . -


DNA RNA






RNA







8. Southern / Northern Blotting.


214 OY

t(9,22) ( Philadelphia, Bcr/Abl - DNA.


), - , in vitro
(CML). DNA
Southern Blotting
t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22) - DNA -
(ALL) - , -
t(8;21) [AML1/ETO], t(15;17) [PML/RARA] inv
16 [MYH11/CBFb] 1012 DNA -
(AML) (1st MIC Cooperative Study Group, 1986). - ,
- . DNA -
Hodgkins ( (cloned).
), Burkitt , -
t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22) MYC;IGH/IGK/IGL - DNA, -
Ewing t(11;22) FL11/EWS2. - DNA -
- .
HER2/neu/erbB2 DNA
HPG-1 -
. -
3.
DNA, -
Southern Blotting
, -
. ,
, -
N-myc
-. -
4.
20 30 -
N-myc
, -
. H N-myc ( 3 300
1.000 -
) .
Southern Blot 4. -
-
OOI O DNA OH DNA
, DNA
DNA DNA () . DNA
, - -
, - . -
, , - (
. - )
DNA , . -
- DNA -

DNA

DNA DNA

DNA









DNA


DNA
DNA

9. DNA.
. 215

BomHI
HindIII

EcoRI
DNA -

SmoI
KpnI
SocI
Sphl

XboI
Pstl
SilI
(. 9).
DNA -
. -
, - Polylinker
-
DNA (. 10). locZ'

. loc
AmpR
-
.
, - ori
pUC 18
2,69 kb



11.
DNA ,
.


. -
-
DNA, -
-
: ) -
DNA (ori), ) -
, ) -
DNA, -
(polylinker)
DNA
(. 11).
-
DNA, -

.
-
.

.

DNA
-
.
DNA




. -
DNA DNA
(genomic DNA library). -
DNA ,
, -
,
10. DNA -
DNA. RNA.
216 OY

OOI O DNA H (dT), -


DNA OH (cDNA LIBRARY) (A) mRNA .
DNA
RNA RNA-DNA . -
. O - RNA,
DNA DNA . 3 -
, - cDNA
DNA (cDNA) mRNA - , -
cDNA DNA
. O cDNA DNA - cDNA. ,
S1 , ,
. DNA,
cDNA mRNA. -
: RNA (
mRNA) -
DNA (comple- . DNA, -
mentary DNA cDNA) mRNA - -
. , -
(reverse transcriptase), .
RNA -
DNA . T DNA DNA (
- ) DNA -
DNA DNA , (screening of the DNA libraries). -
(. 12). : )
12 - DNA , -
- ( ) -
, )
.
5' mRNA 3' H cDNA

. O England et
al5,
5' 3'



DNA 3' 5'

5' 3' -


, cDNA -
3'

5' RNA,
3' RNA , -


3'
cDNA 5' .
H DNA

-

DNA

3' , BASE (breast cancer and
salivary gland expression). SE -
5'
S1
, -
. ,
5' 3'

3'

5' .
cDNA mRNA
O Xu et al6 -
12. cDNA mRNA. ,
. 217

cDNA DNA
. - 3' 5'

P503S P504S. , P510S, -

-
. Northern Blotting 5' 3'
real-time PCR
DNA
/
.
3' 5'

H OH AO
3'
, DNA 3'
-
, 5' 3'
DNA .
() DNA -
13. PCR -
, ()
. DNA .
, 20 kb,
-
DNA (. 13).
, PCR -
: ) DNA (denatu-
.
ration), ) DNA -

(annealing) )
DNA, DNA (li-
(extension) (. 14). PCR
gase). DNA,
-
, in vitro -
. DNA -
-
95C. -


-. -
DNA-
DNA , 5060C. -
. 72C, -
,
H I OA
, aq , -
(PCR POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION)
dNTPs. ,
DNA ,
, - in vitro DNA. -
(PCR).
PCR DNA , -
- . 20
. - 30 -
, - DNA.
. DNA
- .
- DNA in
DNA , vitro ( ) ,
3 - in vivo -
3 . - .
- PCR, ,
() DNA DNA
218 OY


DNA
DNA DNA
DNA ...
DNA
DNA ...

...

...

...

DNA ...


(2 DNA ) ...

...
(4 DNA )

(8 DNA )

14. DNA PCR.

. RNA - ,
K-ras -
DNA (RT-PCR re- , -
verse transcription PCR). PCR 10. O -
Southern K-ras DNA
(- 14 -
, ..). 11,
12.
PCR A O IO -
PCR - . -
. - APC -
, -
, 13,14. -
- -ras p53
15,16. O
. -

7. DNA -
PCR.
,

. 50%
DNA, -
DNA (-
hMLH1 hMSH2). -
DNA8.
H APC PCR17.

. - 95% -
(PCR) - -
- - (HPV).
(Ras, p53, Rb ..) , - PCR 26 .
9.
7590% DNA
- . -
12 K-ras. PCR , -
. 219

, 5264%, -
, 4%. -
. - PSA (RT-PCR) -
PCR-SSCP -
c-Ha-ras DNA , -
. 44% . -
. ,
p53 24.
PCR-SSCP. 17% - RT-PCR -
. H - -
p53 .
10.000 . O
. -
p53 -, -
, - 20 ( -
), -
18.
PCR 25.

RT-PCR (reverse transciption polymerase chain reaction)

mRNA. - .
mRNAs mRNA (CEA)
mRNAs
19. H RT-PCR 26 27.
-, O -
, . O - . -
Ewing -
20. -
H RT-PCR -
, - 2.
- , , -
21.
, -
9
, - 28. -
22. - -
MAGE
-
- -
, 7.

23. MOOI DNA (DNA MICROARRAYS
RT-PCR - DNA CHIPS)
PSA.
, -
mRNA PSA. RNA29. -
, - DNA30 -
, 31.
- -
. -
220 OY

. O - minisequencing , -
DNA - DNA -
, -
. T DNA - 5 . O -
, -
DNA -
DNA. (- . -
2025 nt) , -
chip -
DNA - O 3 -
dot blot . . -
- ddNTPs
.
- .
DNA -
DNA , ,
- ,
. O - 33. H -
DNA -
. - -
DNA - ,
- .
- O Golub et al34
32. -
-- .

CGH
RPS6KB1 MUL APPBP2

RPS6KB1 MUL APPBP2

cDNA

15. cDNA CGH -


MCF7 . . H
17, CGH, 17q23. . -
MCF7 CGH () cDNA (). -
DNA -
, . .
cDNA , () -
() , MUL, RPS6KB1 APPBP2, 17q23 in situ -
. . Y RPS6KB1 MCF7 , FISH44,45.
. 221


- , -
35,36, -
- 37, - .
38, 39,40 , -
41. . -
, CGAP -
- -
. 47.
- CGAP Genetic Annotation Initiative (GAI) -
-

42,43. - . GAI -
- -
, - DNA -
, - . -
. 48,49.

WESTERN BLOTTING
-
, Western Blotting -
- ,
, -
. H
in vivo in vitro.
,
,
, -
, -
(spectral karyotyping) -

(comparative genomic hybridi-
.
sation) 30, -
O
,
SDS (SDS-
. O
PAGE),
Monni et al44,45 Barlund et al46
.
- (blotting)
CGH .
-
(. 15). -
.

- . -
,
. . -
, C ELISA, - .
Western Blotting -
. Western Blot -
.
. -
O OI O OY
OO (CANCER GENOME ANATOMY
PROJECT) . -

Cancer Genome Anatomy Project. O Can- -
cer Genome Anatomy Project (CGAP) - 50.
222 OY

Western Blotting -
ALG-2 54-63, 64-66 -
. - 67.
ALG-2 - FISH -
. - . ,
Western Blot HER2/neu erbB-2 -
. 185 Kd. 25-30%
-
ALG-2 .
- FISH
. . FISH -
ALG- , -
2 , Southern Blot
51. ,
lumican - .
, , H FISH -
. -
. H Western Blott- 8
ing 7, -
mRNA - 68.
(CaSki, ME-180
HeLa). - Bcr/Abl
lumican - . -
-
69.
52.

FIS (FLUORESCENT IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION)


O in situ (FISH) -

. DNA
(probes)
. O -
DNA -
A. . -
.
(. 16): alpha satellites ( ),
-
, , -
-
, (chromoso-
me paints), -
53. -
- . .
-
-
16.
. - FISH. . X ,
, . . Alpha
. satellites ( ),
. .
FISH - , -
, , - . . , -
. - .
. 223

OOH OY (SKY) H ONIIMATIKH OOI (CGH)


H (Spectral Karyotyping (Compara-
SKY) tive Genomic Hybridisation CGH) -
(Comparative Genomic Hybidization CGH) -
, - 74. DNA
. ( -
SKY ) , DNA
- ( -
, - ) . DNs
.
- .
. - DNA DNA -
- , DNA -
SW480
SW620 70 - , .
71. - ,
72. , DNA
-
SKY FISH

. .
.
-
-
15 73. . H CGH
CGH , -
1q, 8q, 20q, 7, 11q13, 20 Mb. -
17q, 9q 16p, 8p, 11q14 18q. .
SKY - CGH
. O - . -
, FAP75,
. 76,
77
8, 1, 17, 16 20. 78.
SKY CGH -
Burkitt, -
CGH, 1q 7q -
- Burkitt79.
.
80
.
81,
82
83.


1. Balmain A. Cancer genetics: from Boveri and Mendel to mi- mor. J Clin Oncol 1997; L5(2): 583-8.
croarrays. Nat Rev Cancer 2001; 1(1): 77-82. 3. Herness EA, Naz RK. A novel human prostate-specific gene-1
2. West DC, Grier HE, Swallow MM, Demetri GD, Granowetter (HPG-1): molecular cloning, sequencing and its potential in-
L, Sklar J. Detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with volvement in prostate carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2003; 63(2):
Ewings sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tu- 329-36.
224 OY

4. Combret V, Audoynaud C, Iacono I, Favrot MC, Schell M, expression and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Ga-
Bergeron C, Puisieux A. Circulating MYCN DNA as a tumor- stric Cancer 2003; 6(4): 217-224.
specific marker in neuroblastoma patients. Cancer Res 2002; 21. Smith B, Selby P, Southgate J, Pittman K, Bradley C, Blair
62(13): 3646-8. GE. Detection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by means
5. Egland KA, Vincent JJ, Strausberg R, Lee B, Pastan I. Disco- of reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction. Lancet
very of the breast cancer gene BASE using a molecular appro- 1999; 338 (8777): 1227-9.
ach to enrich for genes encoding membrane and secreted pro- 22. Buzaid AC, Balch CM. Polymerase chain reaction for dete-
teins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(3): 1099-104. ction of melanoma in peripheral blood: too early to assess cli-
6. Xu J, Stolk JA, Zhang X, Silva SJ, Houghton RL, Matsumura nical value. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88(9): 569-70.
M, Vedvick TS, Leslie KB, Badaro R, Reed SO. Identification 23. Glaser R, Rass K, Seiter S, Hauschild A, Christophers E, Til-
of differentially expressed genes in human prostate cancer us- gen W. Detection of circulating melanoma cells by specific am-
ing subtraction and microarray. Cancer Res 2000; 60(6): 677- plification of tyrosinase complementary DNA is not a reliable
82. tumor marker in melanoma patients: a clinical two-center stu-
7. Bustin SA, Dorudi S. Molecular assessment of tumour stage dy. J Clin Oncol 1997; 18(8): 2818-25.
and disease recurrence using PCR-based assays. Mol Med To- 24. Verhagen PC, Tilanus MG, de Weger RA, van Moorselaar RJ,
day 1998; 4(9): 389-96. van den Tweel JG, Boon TA. Prognostic factors in localised
8. Leon SA, Shapino B, Sklaroff DM, Yaros MJ. Free DNA in prostate cancer with emphasis on the application of molecular
the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy. Cancer techniques. Eur Urol 2002; 41(4): 363-71.
Res 1997; 37(3): 646-50. 25. Denis MG, Lipart C, Leborgne J, LeHur P A, Galmiche JP,
9. Birrer MJ, Brown PH. Application of molecular genetics to Denis M, Ruud E, Truchaud A, Lustenberger P. Detection of
the early diagnosis and screening of lung cancer. Cancer Res disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood of colorectal can-
1992; 52: 2658-2664. cer patients. Int J Cancer 1997; 74(5): 540-4.
10. Ando N, Nakao A, Nomoto S, Takeda S, Kaneko T, Kurokawa 26. Mori M, Mimori K, Ueo H, Tsuji K, Shiraishi T, Barnard GF,
T, Nonami T, Takagi H. Detection of mutant K-ras in dissected Sugimachi K, Akiyoshi T. Clinical significance of molecular
paraaortic lymph nodes of patients with pancreatic adenocar- detection of carcinoma cells in lymph nodes and peripheral
cinoma. Pancreas 1997; 15(4): 374-8. blood by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in
11. Mulcahy HE, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, qiChen X, Anker P, Bal- patients with gastrointestinal or breast carcinomas. J Clin On-
linger A, Fathing MJ, Strain M. A prospective study of K-ras col 1998; 16(1): 128-32.
mutations in the plasma of pancreatic cancer patients. Clin 27. Castaldo G, Tomaiuolo R, Sanduzzi A, Bocchino ML, Ponti-
Cancer Res 1998; 4(2): 271-5. ciello A, Barra E, Vitale D, Bariffi F, Sacchetti L, Salvatore F.
12. Nomoto S, Nakao A, Kasai Y, Harada A, Nonami T, Takagi Lung cancer metastatic cells detected in blood by reverse
H. Detection of ras gene mutations in perioperative peripheral transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and dot-blot analysis.
blood with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res 1996; J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(ll): 3388-93.
87(8): 793-7. 28. Rubnitz JE, Crist WM. Molecular genetics of childhood can-
13. Leppert M, Dobbs M, Scambler P, OConnell P, Nakamura F, cer. Implications for pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.
Stanffer D, et al. The gene for familial polyposis coli maps to Pediatrics 1997; 100(1): 101-8.
the long arm of the chromosome 5. Science 1987; 238: 1411-13. 29. Lipshutz RJ, Fodor SP, Gingeras TR, Lockhart DJ. High den-
14. Konishi M, Kikuchi-Yanoshita R, Tanaka K, Muraoka M, On- sity synthetic oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 20-4.
da A, Okumura Y, et al. Molecular nature of colon tumors in 30. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D,
hereditary nonpolyposis, colon cancer, familial polyposis and Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM,
sporadic colon cancer. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 307-17. Gray JW, Albertson DG. Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh
15. Vogelstein B, Fearon Er, Hamilton Sr, Kern Se, Preisinger Ac, AA, Eisen MB, Pergamethscmkov A, Williams CF, et al. Ge-
Leppert M, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor nome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA
development. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 525-32. microarrays. Nat Genet 1999; 23: 41-6.
16. Bos JL. Ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res 31. Haab BB. Advances in protein microarray technology for pro-
1989; 49: 4682-89. tein expression and interaction profiling. Curr Opin Drug Dis-
17. , . cov Dev 2001; 4: 116-23.
. . . . 2000; (17)6: 556-575. 32. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D,
18. Sjdransky D, van Eschenbach A, Tsai YC, et al. Identification Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM,
of p53 gene mutations in bladder cancer and urine samples. Gray JW, Albertson DG. High resolution analysis of DNA co-
Science 1991; 252-706. py number variation using comparative genomic hybridization
19. Tokunaga E, Ishida M, Kimura Y, Maehara Y. Correlation to microarrays. Nat Genet 1998; 20(2): 207-11.
with bone metastasis and high expression of CK 19 mRNA 33. Macgregor PK, Squire JA. Application of microarrays to the a-
measured by quantitative RT-PCR in the bone marrow of nalysis of gene expression in Cancer. Clinical Chemistry 2002;
breast cancer patients. Breast J 2003; 9(5): 440-2. 48(8): 1170-77.
20. Miyachi K, Sasaki K, Onodera S, Taguchi T, Nagamachi M, 34. Golub TR, Slomm DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M,
Kaneko H, Sunagawa M. Correlation between surviving mRNA Mesirov J, et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class disco-
. 225

very and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Scien- MW. Human macrophage metalloelastase worsens the pro-
ce 1999; 286: 531-7. gnosis of pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg 2002; 235(4): 519-21.
35. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, 51. La Cour JM, Mollerup J, Winding P, Tarabykina S, Sehested
Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. M, Bercntold MW. Up-regulation of ALG-2 in hepatomas and
Nature 2000; 406: 147-51. lung cancer tissue. Am J Pathol 2003; 163(1): 81-9.
36. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen 52. Naito Z, Ishiwata T, Kurban G, Teduka K, Kawamoto Y, Ka-
H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distin- wahara K, Sugisaki Y. Expression and accumulation of lumi-
guish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl can protein in uterine cervical cancer cells at the periphery of
Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 10869-74. cancer nests. Int J Oncol 2002; 20(5): 943-8.
37. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, Rosen- 53. Ried T, Schrock E, Ning Y, Wienberg J. Chromosome paint-
wald A, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ing: a usefull art. Hum Mol Genet 1998; 7(10): 1619-26.
identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000; 403: 503- 54. Conn CM, Harper JC, Winston RM, Delhanty ID. Infertile
11. couples with Robertsonian translocations: preimplantation ge-
38. Bittner M, Meltzer P, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Seftor E, Hendrix M, netic analysis of embryos reveals chaotic cleavage divisions.
et al. Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melano- Hum Genet 1998; 102(1): 111-23.
ma by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000; 406: 536-40. 55. Fung J, Munne S, Garcia J, Kim UJ, Weier HU. Molecular
39. Garber ME, Troyanskaya OG, Schluens K, Petersen S, Thae- cloning of translocation breakpoints in a case of constitutional
sle TZ, Pacyna-Gengelbach M, et al. Diversity of gene expres- translocation t(11;22)(q23;q11) and preparation of probes for
sion in adenocarcinoma of the lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reprod Fertil Dev 1999;
2001; 98: 13784-9. 11(1): 17-23.
40. Bhattacharjee A, Richards WG, Staunton J, Li C, Monti S, Va- 56. Munne S, Scott R, Sable D, Cohen J. First pregnancies after
sa P, et al. Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA preconception diagnosis of translocations of maternal origin.
expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclas- Fertil Steril 1998a; 69(4): 675-81.
ses. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2001; 9: 13790-5. 57. Munne S, Marquez C, Magli C, Morton P, Morrison I. Scor-
41. Dhanasekaran SM, Barrette TR, Ghosh D, Shah R, Varam- ing, criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical
bally S, Kurachi K, et al. Delineation of prognostic biomarkers abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Mol
in prostate cancer. Nature 2001; 4: 12822-6. Hum Reprod 1998b; 4(9): 863-10.
42. Kudoh K, Ramanna M, Ravatn R, Elkahloun AG, Bittner ML, 58. Munne S, Bahce M, Schimmel T, Sadowy S, Cohen J. Case re-
Meltzer PS, et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of doxo- port: chromatid exchange and predivision of chromatids as
rubicin-induced and doxorubicin resistant cancer cells by cDNA other sources of abnormal oocytes detected by preimplanta-
microarray. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 4161-6. tion genetic diagnosis of translocations. Prenat Diagn 1998;
43. Scherf U, Ross DT, Waltham M, Smith LH, Lee JK, Tanabe 18(13): 1450-8.
L, et al. A gene expression database for the molecular pharma- 59. Munne S, Escudero T, Sandalinas M, Sable D, Cohen J. Ga-
cology of cancer. Nat Genet 2000; 24236-44. mete segregation in female carriers of Robertsonian transloca-
44. Monni O, Barlund M, Mousses S, Kononen J, Sauter G, Heis- tions Cytogenet. Cell Net 2000; 90(3-4): 303-8.
kanen Met, et al. Comprehensive copy number and gene ex- 60. Pierce KE, Fitzgerald LM, Seibel MM, Zilberstein M. Preim-
pression profiling of the 17q23 amplicon in human breast can- plantation genetic diagnosis of chromosome balance in em-
cer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 9: 5711-6. bryos from a patient with a balanced reciprocal translocation.
45. Monni O, Hyman L, Mousses S, Barlund M, Kallioniemi A, Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4(2): 167-72.
Kallioniemi OP. From chromosomal alterations to target ge- 61. Weier HU, Munne S, Fung J. Patient-specific probes for pre-
nes for therapy: integrating cytogenetic and functional geno- implantation genetic diagnosis of structural and numerical a-
mic views of the breast cancer genome. Semin Cancer Biol berrations in interphase cells. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999;
2001; 11: 395-401. 16(4): 182-91.
46. Barlund M, Forozan F, Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Chen Y, 62. Van Assche E, Staessen C, Vegetti W, Bonduelle M, Vander-
Bittner ML, et al. Detecting activation of ribosomal protein S6 vorst M, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation ge-
Kinase by complementary DNA and tissue micro array analy- netic diagnosis and sperm analysis by fluorescence in-situ hy-
sis. Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1252-9. bridization for the most common reciprocal translocation
47. Hess JL. The Cancer Genome Anatomy Project: power tools t(11;22). Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5(7): 682-90.
for cancer biologists. Cancer Invest 2003; 21(2): 325-6. 63. Willadsen S, Levron J, Munne S, Schimmel T, Marquez C.
48. Clifford R, Edmonson M, Hu Y, Nguyen C, Scherpbier T, Scott R, Conen J. Rapid visualization of metaphase chromoso-
Buetow KH. Expression-based genetic/physical maps of single- mes in single human blastomeres after fusion with in-vitro ma-
nucleotide polymorphisms identified by the cancer genome a- tured bovine eggs. Hum Reprod 1999; 14(2): 470-5.
natomy project. Genome Res 2000; 10(8): 1259-65. 64. Cassel MJ, Munne S, Fung J, Weier HU. Carrier-specific
49. Riggins GJ, Strausberg RL. Genome and genetic resources breakpoint scanning DNA probes: an approach to preimplan-
from the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project. Hum Mol Genet tation genetic diagnosis in interphase cells. Hum Reprod 1997;
2001; 10(7): 663-7. 12(9): 2019-27.
50. Balaz P, Friess H, Kondo Y, Zhu Z, Zimmermann A, Buchler 65. Escudero T, Lee M, Stevens J, Sandalinas M, Munne S. Preim-
226 OY

plantation genetic diagnosis of pencentric inversions. Prenat Res 2003; 63(18): 5731-7.
Diagn 2001; 21(9): 760-6. 76. Weber-Man gal S, Sinn HP, Popp S, Klaes R, Emig R, Bentz
66. Iwarsson E, Ahrlund-Richter L, Inzunza J, Rosenlund B, Frid- M, Mansmann U, Bastert G, Bartram CP, Jauch A. Breast
strom M, Hillensjo T, Sjoblom P, Nordenskjold M, Blennow E. cancer in young women (up to 35 years): Genomic aberrations
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a large pencentric inver- detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Int J Cancer
sion of chromosome 5. Mol Hum Reprod 1998a; 4(7): 719-23. 2003; 107(4): 583-92.
67. Iwarsson E, Ahrlund-Richter L, Inzunza J, Fridstrom M, Ro- 77. Johnen G, Krismann M, Jaworska M, Mueller KM. CGH find-
senlund B, Hillensjo T, Sjoblom P, Nordenskjold M, Blennow ings in neuroendocrine tumors of the lung. Pathologe 2003;
E. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome. 24(4): 303-7.
Mol Hum Reprod 1998b; 4(9): 871-5. 78. Veltman IM, Veltman IA, Arkesteijn G, Janssen IM, Vissers
68. Bishop JM. The molecular genetics of cancer. Science 1987; LE, de Jong PJ, van Kessel AG, Schoenmakers EF. Chromo-
235: 308-311. somal breakpoint mapping b7y array CGH using flow-sorted
69. Donis-Keller H. Human gene mapping techniques: A labora- chromosomes. Biotechniques 2003; 35(5): 1066-70.
tory manual. New York: Stockton Press, 1991. 79. Garcia JL, Hernandez JM, Gutierrez NC, Flores T, Gonzalez
70. Menzel T, Melcher R, Koehler S, Dusel G, Backhaus K, Ott D, Calasanz MJ, Martinez-Climent IA, Pins MA, Lopez-Capi-
G, Breithaupt W, Al-Taie O, Schauber J, Gostner A, Schep- tan C, Gonzalez MB, Odero MD, San Miguel IF. Abnonnali-
pach W, Luhrs H. Establishment of a colonic adenoma cell li- ties on lq and 7q are associated with poor outcome in sporadic
ne (GEKI-2): spectral karyotype analysis and functional chara- Burkitts lymphoma. A cytogenetic and comparative genomic
cterization. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19(1): 12-7. hybridization study. Leukemia 2003; 17(10): 2016-24.
71. Augustus M, Bruderlein S, Gebhart E. Cytogenetic and cell cy- 80. Matteucci C, La Starza R, Crescenzi B, Romoli S, Santoro A,
cle Studies in metastatic cells from ovarian carcinomas. Anti- Magrin S, Lauria F, Coco FL, Martelli MF, Mecucci C. Diffe-
cancer Res 1986; 6(2): 283-9. rent mechanisms lead to a karyotypically identical t(20;21) in
72. Lu XV, Harris CP, Cooley L, Margolin J, Steuber PC, Sheldon myelodysplastic syndrome and in acute myelocytic leukemia.
M, Rao PH, Lau CC . The utility of spectral karyotyping in the Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003; 140(1): 13-7.
cytogenetic analysis of newly diagnosed pediatric acute lym- 81. Wolter H, Trijic D, Gottfried HW, Mattfeldt T. Chromosomal
phoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2002; 16(11): 2222-7. changes in incidental prostatic carcinomas detected by compa-
73. Kytola S, Rummukainen J, Nordgren A, Karhu R, Farnebo F, rative genomic hybridization. Eur Urol 2002; 41(3): 328-34.
Isola J, Larsson C. Chromosomal alterations in 15 breast can- 82. Lillington DM, Kingston JE, Coen PO, Price E, Hungerford J,
cer cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization and spe- Domizio P, Young BD, Onadim Z. Comparative genomic hy-
ctral karyotyping. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000; 28(3): bridization of 49 primary retinoblastoma tumors identifies
308-17. chromosomal regions associated with histopathology, progres-
74. Weiss MM, Kuipers EJ, Meuwissen SG, van Diest PJ, Meije sion and patient outcome. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003;
GA. Comparative genomic hybridisation as a supportive tool 36(2): 121-8.
in diagnostic pathology. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56(7): 522-7. 83. Rigola MA, Casadevall C, Bemus M, Caballn MR, Ruster C,
75. Tarafa G, Prat E, Risques P, Gonzalez S, Camps J, Grau M, Gelabert Gozcue J, Mir R. Analysis of kidney tumors by com-
Guino E, Moreno V, Esteller M, Herman JG, Genna JR, Miro parative genomic hybridization and conventional cytogenetics.
R, Peinado MA, Capella G. Common genetic evolutionary Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2002; 137(1): 49-53.
pathways in familiar adenomatous Polyposis tumors. Cancer
(PROTEOMICS)
(GENOMICS)
S. Murray, .

, -
O - , -
- .
DNA, -
- ,
. - (high-
throughput technologies)
, - (Human
, - Genome Project):
1. (Genomics): -
. - .
2. (Proteomics): -
, - -
Bcr-Abl , -
- -
- .
ST571 (Gleevec). , 90% 3. (Transcriptomics):
- RNA -
, , , -
.. , (genome) (proteome).
,
- -
, . ,
, - (functional geno-
, mics), ,
.
. -
(profiles) -
, - , -
, DNA - (single nucleotide polymorphisms
(DNA microarrays), - SNPs), R1 DNA,
DNA (sequencing by
hybridization), - , CpG -
cDNA (expression profiling), - (promoters). -
(comparative genomic hybridization),
- X,
- (MRI),
(tandem mass-spectroscopy) - (structural and combinatorial chemistry),
. - -
-
, .
, -

227
228 OY

, DNA
1. -

- - -
,
-
, -
-
( O). O - CHO




.
http://www.healthtech.com
-
( -
), - , -
, -
. O
: - -. --
(comparative genomic hybridisation), -
(genome chromosome , DNA, RNA -
painting), , -
(Serial Analysis of Gene Expression SAGE) DNA .
(microarrays) (Tran- O
scriptosome), -
(2D-protein electrophoresis) - . -
(Proteome). - ,
, -
, -
- micro na-
. - no, -
(transcriptosome), -
RNA (messenger RNA), -
(proteome), . -
, , -
.
30.00060.000 , 80.000250.000
- (OMICS)
OMICs - (splice variants) 500.000 2 -
- . -
- -
(global networking). --
, , Drosophilia1. -
, , - : -
, -
- (. 1). - ,
- (splice variants) - -
, , 98% -
(computational analysis), - -
(wet-chemistry), 2. -
(high- -
throughput technology). .
. 229

- -
-
. (Karyotyping) -
. - - -
, - , 21, -
. , , , -
ONIMATIKH (GENOMICS)
, .. -
.

-
DNA -
-
- (proto-oncoge-
, -
nes), - (tumour
.
suppressor genes). -
, , -
, - ,
. -
(loss of heterozygosity LOH) ( ),
(chromosomal loci) -
- - , de
. LOH novo -
(unbalanced structural rearrangements).
- -
- , -
. - - (PCR, sequencing,
- Southern Blotting ..).
, , -
. - in situ
, DNA, (Fluorescence in situ hybridization FISH)
. O in situ --
- -
- , -
20013,4. -
, -
- . -
DNA- (probes)
5-7. - ,
, , -
- (bacterial artificial chro-
(screening) , mosomes BACs),
- (yeast artificial chromosomes YACs) -
. (plasmid artificial chromosomes
( PACs), 10 > 100
) , - Kb. O (pro-
-
bes) , -
.
(breakpoints) -
, -

, -
-
.

(. 1). FISH
(Conventional karyotyping) -
O - , ,
- (interphase nuclei).
230 OY

1. A. (G-banding). B. (Metaphase spread, G-banding). . FISH.


(probe) ,
(over-amplification).

(spectral microscopy)10.
FISH - SKY -
-
, - (probes) .
(: , 23 -
) . O
, - (probes) -
. - -
, PCR (degenerate oligonucleotide-
primed PCR),
CGH ( - haptens. -
), , , -
, 24 -
8.
.
-
24 -
-
. -
-
-
,
, Leica-M-
FISH (multiplex-FISH M-FISH),
FISH software, -
, . O
9. M- SKY, -
FISH - ,
DNA, (software technology)
, -
2 .
, .
- SKY
- -
(PCR) Southern lot. ,
DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenyl-in-
dole) G-banded (Giemsa banding) ,
(Spectral karyotyping SKY)
SKY . -
FISH, - SKY,
, - -
. 231

2.000 kbp, -FICTION


, (Multicolor-FICTION)
. - -
SKY PCR -
FISH, , (fluorescence im-
- munophenotyping and interphase cytogenetics as a tool
-
for the investigation of neoplasms FICTION). -
(breakpoints).
FISH
, -
ay-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) -
-
( )
. -
.
:
Hodgkin,
-FISH 1% (
SKY, FISH)17.


48 -
11.

Centromeric multiplex-FISH (CM-FISH)12 , -
- PCR (DOP-PCR: de-
(subtelo- generate oligonucleotide primed probes). -
meric) , - -
. O -
. (-
) ,
, - 18.
.
IPM-FISH
Rx-FISH
,
-
M-FISH, -
, -
(IRS-PCR), -
, gibbon,
R- -
-
(combinatorial labeling).
. -
,
-
.
- - 13. -
FISH, (single-step) -
- 19.
(chromosome bar coding)14. -FISH (Micro-FISH)
Fast-FISH (micro-
dissection) (FISH-MD)
DNA, SKY-MD micro-
- FISH -
(denaturing agents) - -
. - . -
(microdissection)
- (PCR)
FISH -
15. -
fast-FISH (LTFF)16. 20,21.
232 OY

PRINS -
, Northern
DNA,
, (differential display),
DNA (in
situ), Taq - .
. - -
FISH, - -
, ,
. -
- 28. O (high-
3 21, - throughput technology)
FISH22,23.
: Combinatorial multi- , -
fluor FISH11, multicolor high resolution banding of chro-
mosomes (mBAND)24 Fibre-FISH, - .
.
- ,
25. 50.000 250.000 -
mRNA. 1994
DNA, Affymetrix,
(Comparative Genomic Hybridization CGH) 16.000 (probes) -
H . -
, - 1,5
. -
. , - (specific hybridization)
-
, - -
-
10 - ,
. , 29. O -
-
CGH, - .
(microarrays technology). - -
- DNA, -
BACs , - cDNA -
0,5
. -
26,27. DNA (complementary) mRNA
(transcripts). O cDNA
(libraries) mRNA,
(Nucleic Acid Based Microarrays) -
-
(Gene Expression Arrays) . O DNA

- (high-density microarrays 70.000 )
(HGMP) - cDNA Gene-Chips. -
(Expressed Sequence Tags EST), -
- DNA, EST (
, - 1.000.000 EST
. 6090% )
. 233

, . (Gene- -
Chips) in situ -
- . -
- -
30,31. -
(Transci- , -
ptosome) cDNA -
, -
- -
, -

, . -
- .
.
-
-


O :
,
-

, -
- RNA
, --
, -
. . -
- -
-
, - ,
.
11q23.
,
,
, -
-
. O
.

- ,
-
,
- -
(tailored treatment).

, - . -

5 , - -
-
. (DNA probes)
- ( -
, , ,
, , ..). O
234 OY

RNA
2. . . -
.
2060 -

. -
2a 2b . . -
cDN.
EST,
Cy5 Cy3 PCR -
.
-

. , -
Cy3 Cy5,
Cy5
-
Cy3 +Cy5 . spot , -
(test).
Cy3 -
, .

(20-60-mer) , spot , -

.
EST
PCR

- , -
() -
( -
, microspotting ..). - DNA (molecular wi-
- res).
.
, cDNA ( ) -
-
. (-)
O cDNA .

. - (PROTEOMICS)
- O -
1994 Macqarie
. (test) (1040 , -
g RNA ) (proteome)33,34. O
- , -
, ,
, - -
- / -
(.. Cy3 Cy5, . / DNA / RNA / ,
2). - . -
(-
- -
SNPs: single nucleotide polymorphisms), - ,
, , -
. - ... -
20 60 . -
- .
-
( ) - ,
( , . 2)32. -
. 235

, - (SAGE)35. -
-
36-39. -
. O ,
, , -
- .
. -
- -
. (two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel
- electrophoresis 2D-PAGE)
: 1. - (Mass Spectrometry MS)
, 2. 2D-PAGE -
3. - pH (-
- - ) -
. . 500 2.000
: - gel.
; gel -
- (MS)
; (. 3). O
- -
, , , NCBI, SWISSPROT,
; HGMP, OWL ..
20 ,
. -
(expression proteomics) 10%


(M).
, .
,
-
, :
,
(High Performance
,
Liquid Chromatography), Matrix Associated Laser De-
-
sorption / Ionisation (MALDI) -
.
. Surface-nhanced
(functional proteomics) Laser Desorption / Ionisation (SELDI)
- -
DNA RNA - (< 20 kDa). O
. , -
- 40. -
-
, - ( femtomolar),
- . -

.
.


(transcriptosome) - (Yeast two-hybrid system)
(proteome). -
- (-) -
RNA (messenger RNA), - -
- (yeast transcription factor,
236 OY

SDS PAGE
3 45 67 9 11 pH
A:

A

B: B
B
IEF

1 200 kDa


1 2 5 6
90 kDa
50 kDa
2
32 kDa

3 21 kDa

()
15 kDa

3. .
, , 2D--
( ) .

Gal4) , - . -
-
Gal441,42. -- , -
-
Gal4 -
. .
O -
( 10.000
- )
. -

. -
(Protein-based Microarrays) -
- , (screening) -
, - (recombinant) ,
- -
. , -
, - -
43,44. O
( -- (zymograms, western blots, 2D- -
), - ) ,
- , ,
, , - -
.
. 237

(protein chip techno-


logy) . LCMD
. 2D- 50.000 -
. LCMD SELDI
, , -
- .
, -
45. (Proteome chips) - (Tissue Microarrays)
-
, (screening)
. -
(protein libraries) , -
(affinity), .. . -
(antibody libraries)46,47.
in situ -
(plated solid phase libraries) -
- . -
DNA. (core biopsies, 0,62,0 mm -
- ) blocks
,
(cross-reactivity), (redun- block . 600 -
dancy). block
DNA, RNA . -
, -
in situ (DNA
(capture molecules) - RNA)28. O -
, , -
.. , -
50.
E O
(Fluorescence resonance energy transfer FRET) -
( )
-
(fluorophores) p53 -
51,52. O -
. -
- cDNA
(control fluorophore) , ,
, - . -
-
48,49. -
. ,
-
(Laser Capture Microdissection LCMD) ,
- ,
, ,
,
. LCMD ,
35 m - 53-55. -
. LCMD -
2D- - , (amplification)
238 OY

17 locations) / (deletions),
, translocation t(9;22)
- (CML) t(X;18)(p11;q11) (sy-
, - novial sarcoma). X
4.700 - , -
, 135
- -
61. (amplification) HER
56. 2/neu 62. -
-
3, 7 17 p16 -
, . O - 9p21 -
(core) -
, - 63.
CGH -
- , -
. -
. -
RNA (RNA interference RNAi) , -
RNA - , -
- - 64.
, - -
RNA (RNA interference)57,58. A -
,
, -
(high-throughput).
RNA. , - CGH SKY,
(switch off) , -
.
- (consortium based data), -
( Phenomics)59. , -
-
. ri-
-
bozymes RNA


-
, -
.
in vivo.
PCR, Southern lotting,
Id4 BRCA 1 -
-

, LOH, MSI ..
ribozyme, -
(global)
60.
(Transciptosome),
mRNA, cDNA -
O OOO
O OO SAGE35,65, -

ONIIMATIKH (WET GENOMICS) , -
O 66. O
, -
.
, 67. O -
(trans-
. 239

68,69. -
- -
, .
RNA (RNA protection assays), Southern
Northern lotting Real-time PCR. (Compa-
rative Genomics),
ONIIMATIKH BAIMENH E YOOITE
- .
, (screening) ,
- , -
, - 71,
. - 72. -
- .
, -
1% OONIIMATIKH
70. (PHARMACOGENOMICS)
, -
,
- .

. ,
-
.
- (pharmacogenomics)
- 73,74. -
(net- ,
work). - .
(Cancer Genome Anatomy Project CGAP) , -
.
(sequencing) 75. -
cDNA. ,
-
, - (screening) ,
- SNP.
(xpressed Sequence Tags database dbEST).
- OH I (GENE THERAPY)
-
. - ,
, - .
,
, - ,
, ,
. .
, -
-
, . O -
, -
. ex vivo -
SNP, ( - in vivo 76,77.
), dbEST
/ -
240 OY

, - -
78. .
-
E OE H RNA . -
O OO - cDNA -
- -
-

, - , -
, (Open Reading Frames ORFs) -
, .
--
-
- . O
. RNAi , knock-
O - - out -
- ,
RNA , -
(rate constants) 85,86.
-DNA
. Chip-chip (chromatin
immunoprecipitation array), DNA
- . T -
, -
- -
. - (yeast-two-hybrid technique)87,88. -
, -
, - 64,89.
, , , DNA
. , -
O - ,
, - .
,
. - -
(Biomolecular Inter-
action Network Database BIND), - -
(Database of Interact- .
ing Proteins DIP), - (protein localization profil-
(Molecular Interactions Database MINT) ing) -
-
(General Repository for Interaction Data- (green fluorescent protein tagged proteins). O
sets GRID), 79-82. O (protein identification) -
,
- -
83,84. -
- ,
, , -
90-92. O -
-
.
- 93,94.
. 241

- A
- (high-
throughput technology) -
-
, -
- . O
95,96. -
-
,
-
, , ..
mRNAs -
. - -
, .
mRNAs
-
, -
,
. - ,
( -
single-hit multiple-hit ).
.
- .
-
(transcripts), - -
. O - -
- / .
, - ,
(splice variation), , RNA ,
(non-linerality) , cDNA -
(amplification steps), ,
, , - .
. -
- ,
. (laser capture techniques) -
- .
- -
/ RNA / DNA. O ,
- - :
- )
, .
) -
- .
, - )
. - .
) .
. - ) -
- - .
-, - ) -
. .
242 OY

) -
. -
) .
-
.
) , , - -
. ,
. ,
- - -
- -
- O -
O. O , , -
, .
,


1. Claverie JM. What if there are only 30000 human genes? 15. Durm M, Schussler L, Munch H, et al. Fast-painting of human
Science 2001; 291: 1255-1527. metaphase spreads using a chromosome-specific, repeat-de-
2. Sorek R, Amitai M. Piecing together the significance of splic- pleted DNA library probe. Biotechniques 1998; 24: 820-825.
ing. Nature Biotechnol 1996; 19: 196. 16. Durm M, Haar FM, Hausmann M, Ludwig H, Cremer C.
3. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial Non-enzymatic, low temperature fluorescence in situ hybridi-
sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; zation of human chromosomes with a repetitive alpha-satellite
409: 860-921. probe. Z Naturforsch 1997; 52: 82-88.
4. Ventner JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. The sequence of 17. Soenen V, Fenaux P, Flactif M, et al. Combined immunophe-
the human genome. Science 2001; 291: 1304-1351. notyping and in situ hybridization (FICTION): a rapid method
5. Brent R. Genomic biology. Cell 2000; 100: 169-183. to study cell lineage involvement in myelodysplastic syndro-
mes. Br J Haematol 1995; 90: 701-706.
6. Jiminez-Sanchez G, Childs B, Valle D. Human disease genes.
18. Carter NP. Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting. Cy-
Nature 2001; 409: 853-855.
tometry 1994; 18: 2-10.
7. Baltimore D. Our genome unveiled. Nature 2001; 409: 814-
19. Aurich-Costa J, Vannier A, Gregoire E, Nowak F, Cherif D.
815.
IPM-FISH, a new M-FISH approach using ISR-PCR painting
8. Weiss MM, Hermsen MA, Meijer GA, et al. Comparative ge- probes: application to the analysis of seven human prostate
nomic hybridization. Mol Pathol 1999; 52: 243-251. cell lines. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001; 30: 143-160.
9. Speicher MR, Gwys Ballard S, Ward DC. Karyotyping human 20. Weimer J, Koehler MR, Wiedemann U, et al. Highly compre-
chromosomes by combinatorial multi-flour FISH. Nat Genet hensive karyotype analysis by a combination of spectral karyo-
1996; 12: 368-375. typing (SKY), microdissection, and reverse painting (SKY-MD).
10. Schrock E, du Manoir S, Veldman T, et al. Multicolor spectral Chromosome Res 2001; 9: 395-402.
karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 1996; 273: 494- 21. Meltzer PS, Guan XY, Burgess A, Trent JM. Rapid genera-
497. tion of region specific probes by chromosome microdissection
11. Joyce CA, Ross FM, Dennis NR, Wyre ND, Barber JC. Multi- and their application. Nat Genet 1992; 1: 24-28.
paint FISH: a rapid and reliable way to define cryptic and 22. Hou JW, Wang TR. Primed in situ (PRINS) labeling for rapid
complex abnormalities. Clin Genet 1999; 56: 192-199. detection of numeric and structural chromosome anomalies. J
12. Henegariu O, Bray-Ward P, Artan S, et al. Small marker chro- Formos Med Assoc 1997; 96: 46-50.
mosome identification in metaphase and interphase using cen- 23. Hindkjaer J, Koch J, Terkelsen C, et al. Fast, sensitive multi-
tromeric multiplex fish (CM-FISH). Lab Invest 2001; 81: 475- color detection of nucleic acids in situ by PRimed IN Situ la-
481. beling (PRINS). Cytogenet Cell Genet 1994; 66: 152-154.
13. Teixeira MR, Micci F, Dietrich CU, Heim S. Detailed geno- 24. Michalova K, Zemanova Z, Brezinova J. Multicolor fluore-
me-wide screening for inter- and intrachromsomal abnorma- scence in situ hybridization (-FISH). Cas Lek Cesk 2001; 140:
lities by sequential G-banding and RxFISH color banding of 99-103.
the same metaphase cells. Cancer Gent Cytogenet 2000; 119: 25. Florijn RJ, Bonden LA, Vrolijk H, et al. High-resolution DNA
94-101. Fiber-FISH for genomic DNA mapping and color bar-coding
14. Muller S, Wienberg J. Bar-coding primate chromosomes: of large genes. Hum Mol Genet 1995; 4: 831-836.
molecular cytogenetic screening for the ancestral hominoid 26. Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, et al. Matrix-based
karyotype. Hum Gent 2001; 109: 85-94. comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for ge-
. 243

nomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997; 20: 399- 48. Schmidt JA, Sitte HH. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer
407. in the study of cancer pathways. Curr Opin Oncol 2003; 15: 55-
27. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis 64.
of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hy- 49. Lewis F, et al. Unlocking the archive-gene expression in paraf-
bridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 1988; 20: 207-211. fin-embedded tissue. J Pathol 2001; 195: 66-71.
28. Murray S. The Technology of Microarrays and Applications in 50. Camp RL, Chung GG, Rimm DL. Automated subcellular lo-
Oncology. Forum Clin Oncol 2002; 1: 44-48. calization and quantification of protein expression in tissue mi-
29. Ramaswamy S, Golub TR. DNA microarrays in clinical onco- croarrays. Nature Medicine 2002; 11: 1323-1327.
logy. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1932-1941. 51. Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, et al. Tissue microar-
30. Ramsay G. DNA chips: state-of-the art. Nat Biotechnol 1998; rays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor speci-
16: 427-431. mens. Nat Med 1998; 4: 844-847.
31. Granjeaud S, et al. Expression profiling: DNA arrays in many 52. Kallioniemi OP, Wagner U, Kononen J, Sauter G. Tissue mi-
guises. Bioessays 1999; 21: 781-790. croarray technology for high-throughput molecular profiling of
32. Freeman WM, et al. Fundamentals of DNA hybridization ar- cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10: 657-662.
rays for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques 2000; 29: 1042- 53. Bubendorf L, Kononen J, Koivisto P, et al. Survey of gene am-
1055. plifications during prostate cancer progression by high-through-
33. Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Gooley AA, et al. Progress with pro- out fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays.
Cancer Res 1999; 59: 803-806.
teome projects. Why all proteins expressed by a genome should
be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 54. Bubendorf L, Kolmer M, Kononen J, et al. Hormone therapy
1996; 13: 19-50. failure in human prostate cancer: analysis by complementary
DNA and tissue microarrays. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:
34. Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Williams KL, Hochstrasser DF. Cur-
1758-1764.
rent challenges and future applications for protein maps and
post-translational vector maps in proteome projects. Electro- 55. Bowen C, Bubendorf L, Voeller HJ, et al. Loss of NKX3.1 ex-
phoresis 1996; 17; 830-838. pression in human prostate cancers correlates with tumor pro-
gression. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 6111-6115.
35. Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Serial a-
56. Schraml P, Kononen J, Bubendorf L, et al. Tissue microarrays
nalysis of gene expression. Science 1995; 270: 484-487.
for gene amplification surveys in many different tumor types.
36. Lockhart DJ, Winzelar EA. Genomics, gene expression and
Clin Cancer Res 1999; 1966-1975.
DNA arrays. Nature 2000; 405: 827-836.
57. Montgomery MK, Xu SQ, Fire A. Rna as a target of double-
37. Debouck C, Goodfellow PN. DNA microarrays in drug disco-
stranded rna-mediated genetic interference in caenorhabditis
very and development. Nature Genet 1999; 21: 48-51.
elegens. PNAS 1998; 95: 15502-15507.
38. Stratowa C, Wilgenbus KK. Gene expression profiling in drug
58. Fire A. Rna-triggered gene silencing. Trends Genet 1999; 15:
discovery. Curr Opin Mol Ther 1999; 1: 671-679. 358-363.
39. Clarke PA, te Poele R, Wooster R, Workman P. Gene expres- 59. Li QX, Robbins JM, Welch PJ, et al. A novel functional geno-
sion microarray analysis in cancer biology, pharmacology and mics approach identifies mtert as a suppressor of fibroblast
drug development: progress and potential. Biochem Pharma- transformation. NAR 2000; 28: 2605-2612.
col 2001; 62: 1311-1336.
60. Beger C, Pierce LN, Kruger M, et al. Identification of id4 as a
40. Merchant M, Weinberger SR. Recent advancements in surface- regulator of brca1 expression by using a ribozyme-based inver-
enhancement laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass se genomics approach. PNAS 2001; 98: 130-135.
spectrometry. Electrophoresis 2000; 21: 1164-1167.
61. Mitelman F, Mertens F, Johansson B. A breakpoint map of re-
41. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-pro- current chromosomal rearrangements in human neoplasia. Nat
tein interactions. Nature 1989; 340: 245-246. Genet 1997; 417-472.
42. Coates PJ, Hall PA. The yeast two hybrid system for identify- 62. Funkhouser WK, Kaiser-Rogers K. Review: significance of,
ing protein-protein interactions. J Path 2003; 199: 4-7. and optimal screening for, HER-2 gene amplification and pro-
43. Haab BB. Advances in protein microarray technology for pro- tein overexpression in breast carcinoma. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2001;
tein expression and interaction profiling. Curr Opin Drug Dis- 31: 349-358.
cov Devel 2001; 4: 116-123. 63. Halling KC, King W, Sokolova IA, et al. A comparison of cyto-
44. Schweitzer B, Kingsmore SF. Measuring proteins on microar- logy and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of
rays. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2002; 13: 14-19. urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 2000; 164: 1768-1775.
45. Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R, et al. Global analysis of protein 64. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, vant Veer LJ, et al. A gene-expres-
activities using proteome chips. Science 2001; 293: 2101-2105. sion signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. NEJM
46. Schweitzer B. Multiplexed protein profiling on microarrays by 2002; 347: 1999-2009.
rolling-circle amplification. Nat Biotechnology 2002; 20: 359- 65. Polyak K, Riggins GJ. Gene discovery using the serial analysis
365. of gene expression technique: implications for cancer research.
47. Haab BB, Dunham MJ, Brown PO. Protein microarrays for J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2948-2958.
highly parallel detection and quantitation of specific proteins 66. Scherf U, Ross DT, Waltham M, et al. A gene expression data-
and antibodies in complex solutions. Genome Biol 2001; 2: 1-13. base for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Nature Genet
244 OY

2000; 24: 227-235. 89. Reynolds T. For proteomics research, a new race has begun.
67. Clarke PA, te Poele R, Wooster R, Workman P. Gene expres- JNCI 2002; 94: 552-554.
sion microarray analysis in cancer biology, pharmacology, and 90. Ficarro SB, et al. Phosphproteome analysis by mass spectro-
drug development: progress and potential. Biochem Pharma- metry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat
col 2001; 62: 1311-1336. Biotechnol 2002; 20: 301-305.
68. Perou CM, Serlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of 91. Wells L, et al. Mapping sites of O-GlcNAc modification using
human breast tumours. Nature 2000; 406: 747-752. affinity tags for serine and threonine post-translational modifi-
69. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, et al. Molecular classifica- cations. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002; 1: 791-804.
tion of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene ex- 92. Mann M, et al. Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass
pression monitoring. Science 1999; 286: 531-537. spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Bio-
70. Fearon ER. Human cancer syndromes: clues to the origin and technol 2002; 20: 261-268.
nature of cancer. Science 1997; 278: 1043-1050. 93. Li J, Zhang Z, Rosenzweig J, Wang YY, Chan DW. Proteo-
71. Loots GG, Locksley RM, Blankespoor CM, et al. Identifica- mics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum
tion of a coordinate regulator of interleukins 4, 13, and 5 by biomarkers to detect breast cancer. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 1296-
cross-species sequence comparisons. Science 2000; 288: 136-140. 1304.
72. Onyango P, Miller W, Lehoczky J, et al. Sequence and compa- 94. Petricoin III PF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, et al. Use of proteo-
rative analysis of the mouse 1-megabase region orthologous to mic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 2002;
the human 11p15 imprinted domain. Genome Res 2000; 10: 359: 572-577.
1697-1710. 95. Jeong H, et al. Lethality and centrality in protein network. Na-
73. Slonim DK. Transcriptional profiling in cancer: the path to cli- ture 2001; 411: 41-42.
nical pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics 2001; 2: 123-136. 96. Wagner A. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapi-
74. Smaglik P. Pharmacogenetics initiative galvanizes public and dly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol Biol Evol
private sectors. Nature 2001; 410: 393-394. 2001; 18: 1283-1292.
75. Jain KK. Applications of biochip and microarray systems in
pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics 2000; 1: 289-307. -
76. Anklesaria P. Gene therapy: a molecular approach to cancer
treatment. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2000; 4: 426-432. a. Bayani J, Squire JA. Advances in the detection of chromoso-
77. Kuroiwa Y, Tomizuka K, Shinohara T, et al. Manipulation of mal aberrations using spectral karyotyping. Clin Genet 2001;
human minichromosomes to carry greater than megabase-sized 59: 65-73.
chromosome inserts. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 10: 1086-1090. b. Bayani J, Squire JA. Applications of SKY in cancer cytogene-
78. Somia N, Verma IM. Gene therapy: trials and tribulations. Nat tics. Cancer Invest 2002; 20: 373-386.
Rev Genet 2001; 2: 91-99. c. Going JJ, Gusterson BA. Molecular pathology and future de-
79. Bader GD, et al. BIND the Biomolecular Interaction Net- velopments. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 1895-1904.
work Database. NAR 2001; 29: 242-245. d. Kelly L, Clark J, Gilliland DG. Comprehensive genotypic ana-
80. Xenarios I, et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a lysis of leukemia: clinical and therapeutic implications. Curr
research tool for studying cellular networks of protein intera- Opin Oncol 2002; 14: 10-18.
ctions. NAR 2002; 30: 303-305. e. Lee C, et al. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization in
81. Zanzoni A, et al. MINT: A Molecular Interaction database. clinical cytogenetic diagnostics. Curr Opin Pediatr 2001; 13:
FEBS Lett 2002; 513: 135-140. 550-555.
82. Breitkreutz BJ, et al. The GRID: the general repository for in- f. Patel AS, et al. Cytogenetics and cancer. Curr Opin Oncol
teraction databases. Genome Biol 2002; 3: 13. 2000; 12: 62-67.
83. Mewes HW, et al. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein g. Debouck C, Goodfellow PN. DNA microarrays in drug disco-
sequences. NAR 2002; 30: 31-34. very and development. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1 Suppl): 48-50.
84. Dwight SS, et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) pro- h. Hacia JG. Resequencing and mutational analysis using oligo-
vides secondary gene annotation using Gene Ontology (GO). nucleotide microarrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1 Suppl): 42-7.
NAR 2002; 30: 69-72. i. Cole KA, Krizman DB, Emmert-Buck MR. The genetics of
85. Nolan PM, et al. A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven cancera 3D model. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1 Suppl): 38-41.
mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mou- j. Brown PO, Botstein D. Exploring the new world of the geno-
se. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 440-443. me with DNA microarrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1 Suppl): 33-
86. Wu RZ, et al. Cell-biological applications of transfected-cell 37.
microarrays. Trends Cell Biol 2002; 12: 485-488. k. Bowtell DD. Options availablefrom start to finishfor ob-
87. Robyr D, et al. Microarray deacetylation maps determine ge- taining expression data by microarray. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1
nome-wide functions for yeast histone deacetylases. Cell 2002; Suppl): 25-32.
109: 437-446. l. Lipshutz RJ, Fodor SP, Gingeras TR, Lockhart DJ. High den-
88. van Leeuwen F, et al. Dot1p modulates silencing in yeast by sity synthetic oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1
methylation of the nucleosome core. Cell 109; 745-756. Suppl): 20-24.
. 245

m. Cheung VG, Morley M, Aguilar F, Massimi A, Kucherlapati s. Drewes G, Bouwmeester T. Global approaches to protein-pro-
R, Childs G. Making and reading microarrays. Nat Genet tein interactions. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2003; 15:
1999; 21(1 Suppl): 15-19. 199-205.
n. Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM. Expres- t. Zhu H, Bilgin M, Snyder M. Proteomics. Ann Rev Biochem
sion profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1 2003; 72: 783-812.
Suppl): 10-14. u. Fenyo D, Beavis RC. Informatice and data management in
o. Southern E, Mir K, Shchepinov M. Molecular interactions on proteomics. Trends in Biotechnol 2002; 20: S35-S38.
microarrays. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1 Suppl): 5-9. v. Strausberg RL, Greenhut SF, Grouse LH, et al. In silico analy-
p. Array of hope. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (1 Suppl): 3-4. sis of cancer through the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project.
q. Taylor SW, Fahy E, Ghosh SS. Global organellar proteomics. TRENDS in Cell Biology 2001; 11: S66-S71.
TRENDS in Biotechnol 2001; 21: 82-88. w. Rosell R, Monzo M, OBrate A, Taron M. Translational onco-
r. Huynen MA, Snel B, von Mering C, Bork P. Function predi- genomics: toward rational therapeutic decision-making. Curr
ction and protein networks. Current Opinion in Cell Biology Opin Oncol 2002; 14: 171-179.
2003; 15: 191-198.
V
O
I
.. ...................................................................................................... 249

,
. , E. .................................................................................. 261

. .

I -
O - (. 1) -
-
.
. - DNA RNA
-
, -
.
.
,
-
OI PAH RNA DNA
- OKOONN IN

- -
.
O -
: , .
-
-

-
.
,
, Per-
.
ton Rous 1911, Rous Sar-
-
coma Virus (RSV)1,
,
1. -

-

20 2.
1. . -
, RNA OKOONOI IOI
. O -
2. .


- 3. -
. 60 70 Duesberg Vogt -
3. . O - , RSV (Rous
- Sarcoma Virus),
.
4.
, ALV (Avian Leuki-
. - mia Virus),
- .
. in vitro RSV4
5. . - -
-
.
-
-

249
250 OY

, -
Src5,6. -
12.
7,8 - -
- ,
Src.
- .
-
,
9. --
-
- . O -
, , -
.
- -
- .
-
- , -
,
(. 2)10. - [.. avian leukosis virus, mouse mammary tumor virus
(MMTV)]. -
30
- -
11. -
(upstream) - .
- -
- -

2.

O I

Abl Abelson murine leukimia virus Ab-MLV


Fes ST feline sarcoma virus ST-FeSV
Fps Fujinami sarcoma virus FuSV
Src Rous sarcoma virus RSV
ErbB Avian erythroblastosis virus AEV-ES4
Fms McDonough feline sarcoma virus SM-FeSV
Kit Hardy-Zuckerman-4 feline sarcoma virus HZ4-FeSV
Mil Avian myelocytoma virus MH2 /
Mos Moloney murine sarcoma virus Mo-MSV /
Raf Murine sarcoma virus 3611 MSV3611 /
Sis Simian sarcoma virus SSV
H-ras Harvey murine sarcoma virus Ha-MSV GDP/GTP binding
K-ras Kirsten murine sarcoma virus Ki-MSV GDP/GTP binding
ErbA Avian erythroblastosis virus AEV-ES4
Ets Avian myeloblastosis virus E26 AMV-E26
Fos FBJ osteosarcoma virus FBJ-MSV (AP1 component)
Jun Avian sarcoma virus 17 ASV-17 (AP1 component)
Myb Avian myeloblastosis virus AMV
Myc MC29 myelocytoma virus MC29
Rel Reticuloendotheliosis virus REV-T (NF-kB family)
Crk CT10 avian sarcoma virus CT10
IV. 251

3. , -

O I

Lck Moloney murine leukimia virus Mo-MLV


c-erbB Rous-associated virus 1 RAV-1
c-fms Friend murine leukimia virus Fr-MLV
Pim 1 Moloney murine leukimia virus Mo-MLV /
Egf 3 / Int 2 Mouse mammary tumor virus MMTV
Wint 1 / Int 1 Mouse mammary tumor virus MMTV
Wint 3 / Int 4 Mouse mammary tumor virus MMTV
c-Ki-ras Friend murine leukimia virus Fr-MLV GDP/GTP binding
Ets 1 Moloney murine leukimia virus Mo-MLV
c-fos Rous-associated virus 1 RAV-1 (AP1 component)
c-myb Rous-associated virus 1 RAV-1
c-myb Moloney murine leukimia virus Mo-MLV
c-myc Rous-associated virus 1 RAV-1
c-myc Moloney murine leukimia virus Mo-MLV
Fis 1 / Cyclin D1 Friend murine leukimia virus Fr-MLV G1
Vin 1 / Cyclin D2 Moloney murine leukimia virus Mo-MLV G1

, -
- . -
13. -
, .. c-myc
70 - (. 3) avian-
, , leukosis virus N-myc -
in vivo, , Wood-
- chuck hepatitis virus14,15.
- O TV (Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus)
. , -
-- . -

.
, (Int 2) fibroblast growth fa-
ctor gene Wnt-116. O
-
,
- MMTV .
. O -
DNA OKOONOI IOI
, DNA (poly-
, - omaviruses, papilloma viruses, adenoviruses) -

.
, 17,18,19.
- -
, . , -
,
, . -
- -
252 OY

DNA - p53, ,
- -
(tumor suppressor genes). - SV40
DNA 6.
- p53
-. O ( -
p53),
, - - - -
S - 26. -
- -
DNA. -
1 -
Simian Virus 40 (SV40) T-ag (large T-antigen), 27. pRb (
) , ,
DNA, -- SV40
S20,21,22. O - T-ag, p53, -
-
DNA 22,28.
4. - -
- -
- SV40. O
.
- -
- p53 pRb - DNA -
-. p53
DNA -23,24. - - -
DNA ,
, - -
p53 pRb, - -
, - ( -
)
25. , DNA

4. A

SV40 - P53, PRb


t- PP2A
HPV E6 P53 via E6AP, DLG, MAGI 1, MUPP 1
E7 PRb
Adeno E1A PRb
E1B-55K P53
Adeno9 E4ORF1 DLg, MAGI-1, MUPP 1
BPV E5 PDGF- receptor
EBV LMP1 TRAFs
HBV HBx(?) P53, DDB1
Polyoma T- PRb
T- c-Src, PI3-K, PLC-, Shc
t- PP2A

Adeno: , BV: , PDGF: , PI3-K: , Poly-


oma: , PLC-: , PP2A:
IV. 253

stress29.
in vitro
, MDM2, ARF
30,31. - SV40 polyoma. -
p53, -
- ,
-
DNA. pRb - T-ag
E2F T-ag. -
G1 , pRb - , -
, - (.. myc ras, E1A
2F 1) -
.
DNA.

T-ag pRb-
in vivo
E2F -
2F, -
.
-
DNA . -
- SV40. , -
6 HPV (Human Pa- . -
pilloma Virus) p53 - avian erythroblastosis,
- V-erbA V-erbB
, E1B-55K . O - in vivo -
, , ,
(pRb) - , V-erbB.
. - -

pRb, p107 p130, - -
- , ,
-
. , -
. -
p53 pRb, -
SV40T-ag. .
-
H KAPKINOENEH OYTAIAKO -
AINOMENO
DNA
- .
- -
- -
, - ,
32,33,34. H - 36. -
- ,
35. - -
, - . -
- . -
in vitro 1-19
in vivo.
254 OY

Bcl-2, , , - 6.

p5337,14, 6 HPV 1. O
T-ag SV40. .
2. O
-.
OI IOI AITIA HMIOYPIA KAPKINOY 3.
TON ANPO .
4. O

.
5. O -
38,39 ,
.
(. 5). 6. -
-
- .
. O 7.
.
. HBV HCV 8. O -
.
- 9. O
(HCC)40,41, o EBV Burkitt lymfo-
ma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), Hodgkins di- .
sease 42, 10. -
.
HPV -
11. O
43, HTLV .
T-cell leukemia - 12. -
44, HHV-8 (KSHV) Kaposi45 .
SV40 -
, 46. -
15% ( -
, ).
. O , - -
6,
- . O -
. -
, , . O
5. -
-
, ,


epadnaviridae HBV 47. O -
Herpesviridae
Gammaherpesviruses EBV HHV-8 (KSHV)
Papovaviridae
,
Papillomaviruses HPV (high risk types) HPV (other types) 48. -
Polyomaviruses SV40, BKV, JCV HHV-8 (KSHV),
Adenoviridae
Poxviridae , -
Molluseipoxvirus MCV
Leporipoxvirus
, -
Retroviridae 49.
Simple O -
Complex
Flaviviridae HTLV-1 . -
HCV HIV
-
IV. 255

: )
- - -
, ,
( EBV -), ) -
- , , -
(HSV -
, HPV ), ) - -
54.
- (.. HIV Influenza Virus).
- -
- -
. , . -
HPV 50% - -
, -
,
50. ,
- .
.
HPV -
-
. O - . O
,
-
. O HBV .
,
,
51. HBV - -
90% .

MHXANIMOI PAH OKOONN IN
. TON ANPO
O
HCC . -
O HCV : )
85% ) . O
- -
, - , .
O -
. ,
HCV in vitro.
-
, 3%
52.
O EBV ,
- ,
. .

1, O
- - O DNA
- . O
V53.
256 OY

, S3
- 33 p5358. O
DNA. O Papilloma HTLV-1 -
Polyoma - ATL
- - 59.
. ,
- p53 pRb - , -
. , -
HPV, ,
6 7, O.

5. - EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS
O Epstein-Barr herpesvirus, -
platelet-derived growth factor Gammaherpes viridae. O EBVs
, DNA 172 Kb
55. 100 -
EBV. O .
(LMP1), - -
,
, -- EBV Burkitt lymphoma -
BL
. EBV . -
(EBNAs) -
. 1
BL -
56. . -
DNA EBV, -
O ,
O , --
-
, - . -
- -
. V Hodgkins, -
HBV - 53.
,
, - HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV)
, - O B (HBV) DNA -
. - . -
Hepadnaviridae
, - DNA 32 Kb. -
. HBV
. - -
, -
HPV EBV, - .
- -
- 60.
- -
- -
57. ,
HCV, HBV
, - .
IV. 257

HEPATITIS C VIRUS (HCV) .


O C (HCV) RNA -
- , -
Flaviviridae. 95 Kb HPV -
. HPV . -
HCV -
6 -
50 . HCV -
80% - . -
, 30% - HPV -
HCC. - , -
HCV - -
, - DNA .
, - DNA 6 7
, 2 -
, ,
Flavivirus, 6 7 62.
. O -
HUMAN HERPES VIRUS 8 (HHV-8)
HCV -
61. O HHV-8 -
, -
HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS (HPV) Kaposi63 -
O , - KSHV (Kaposis Sarcoma-associated herpesvi-
DNA - rus). O HHV-8 -2-,
8 Kb. 120 - 140,5 Kb -
HPV EBV. O -
, HPV 16 HPV 18 - .

,
. -
- -
-
. . -
,
. ,
HPV
64.
- -
-
. 99% - -
DNA - .
HPV, - ,
- O,
.
-
Hill HPV - . O -
, - , ,
, - -
, - .
258 OY

1. Rous P. Transmission of a malignant new growth by means of 20. Pipas JM. Common and unique features of T antigens encod-
a cell-filtrate. A Am Med Assoc 1911; 56: 198. ed by the poluomavirus group. J Virol 1992; 66: 3979-3985.
2. Vogt PK. Historical introduction to the general properties of 21. Butel JS, Lednicky JA. Cell and molecular biology of simian
retroviruses. In: Coffin JM, Hughcs S, Varmus HE, eds. Retro- virus 40, implications for human in infection and disease. J
viruses. New York: Gold Spring Harbor, 1997: 1-25. Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:119-134.
3. Fields BD, Knipe DM, et al. Virology. 2nd ed. New York: Ro- 22. Neil JO, et al. p53 and tumor viruses catching the guardian off-
wen Press, 1990. guard. Trends Microbiol 1997; 5: 115-120.
4. Temin HM, Rubin H. Characteristics of an assay for Rous sar- 23. Nevins JR, Vogt PK. Cell transformation by viruses. In: Fields
coma virus and Rous sarcoma cells in tissue culture. Virology BD, et al. Virology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott-Ra-
1958; 6: 669-688. ven, 1996; Vol. 1: 301-343.
5. Lai MMC, Deusberg PH, et al. Avian tumor virus RNA: a 24. Ishido S, Hotta H. Complex formation of the non-structional
comparison of three sarcoma viruses and their transformation protein 3 of hepatitis C virus with the p53 tumor suppressor.
defective derivatives by oligonucleotide finger printing and FEBS Let. 1998; 438: 258-262.
DNA RNA hybridization. PNAS 1973; 70: 2266-2270. 25. Anton M, et al. The role of tumor suppressors and viral onco-
6. Lane DP, Crawford LV. T antigen is bound to a host protein proteins in cervical carcinogenesis. Geska Gunekol Jul. 2000;
in SV-40 transformed cells. Nature 1979; 278: 261-263. 65 (4): 275-278.
7. Baltimore D. RNA dependent DNA polymerase in virions of 26. Finlay CA, Hinds PW, Levine AJ. The p53 proto-oncogene act
RNA tumor viruses. Nature 1970; 226: 1209-1211. as a suppressor of transformation. Cell 1989; 17: 43-52.
8. Temin HM, Rubin H. Characteristics of an assay for Rous sar- 27. Whyte P, et al. Association between an oncogene and an anti-
coma virus and Rous sarcoma cells in tissue culture. Virology oncogene: the adenovirus EIA protein bind to the retinobla-
1958; 6: 669-688. stoma gene product. Nature 1988; 334: 124-129.
9. Stehelin D, Varmus HE, et al. DNA related to the transform- 28. Cheng Yue. Human DNA oncogenic viruses and their trans-
ing gene(s) of avian sarcoma viruses is present in normal avian forming protein interactions with cell cycle control proteins.
DNA. Nature 1976; 260: 170-173. Chinese Medical Journal 1999; 112 (4): 291-296.
10. Hsu JL, Glaser SL. Epstein-Barr virus associated malignancies 29. Lane DP. Cancer p53 guardian of the genome. Nature 1992;
epidemiologic patterns and etiologic implications. Crit Rev 358: 15-16.
Oncol Hematol 2000; 34 (1): 27-53. 30. Freedman DA, Levine AJ. Regulation of the p53 protein by
11. Rosenberg N, Jolicoeur P. Retroviral pathogenesis. In: Hughcs the mdm2 oncoprotein. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 1-7.
S, Vatmus HE, eds. Retroviruses. New York: Gold Spring 31. Amudson SA, et al. Roles for p53 in growth arrest and apopto-
Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997: 475-585. sis putting on the brakes after genotoxic stress. Oncogene 1998;
12. Telesnitsky A, Goff SP. Reverse transcriptase and the genera- 17: 3287-3299.
tion of retroviral DNA. In: Coffin JM, et al, eds. Retroviruses. 32. Bishop JM. Molecular themes in oncogenesis. Cell 1991; 64:
New York: Gold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997: 121- 235-248.
160. 33. Weinberg RA. Oncogenes, antioncogenes and the molecular
13. Krung HJ, et al. Retroviral mutagenesis of cellular oncogenes, basis of multistep carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 3713-
a review with insights into the mechanisms of insertional acti- 3721.
vation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1991; 171: 1-25. 34. Howely PM, Munger K. Human papillomaviruses and squa-
14. Finzer P, et al. The role of human papillomavirus oncoproteins mous cell carcinomas. In: Microbes and malignacy. Oxford: Ox-
E6 and E7 in apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 2002; 15:188 (1-2), 15-24. ford University Press, 1999: 157-179.
15. Fourel G, et al. Frequent activation of N-myc genes by hepad- 35. Zur Hawgen H. Viruses in human cancers. Science 1991; 254:
navirus insertion in Woodchuck liver tumor. Nature 1990; 347: 1167-1173.
294-298. 36. Teodoro IG, Branton PE. Regulation of apoptosis by viral ge-
16. Luther SA, Acha-Orbea H. Mouse mammary tumor virus, ne products. J Virol 1997; 71: 1739-1746.
immunological interplays between virus and host. Adv Immu- 37. Gottlieb TM, Oren M. p53 and apoptosis. Semin Cancer Biol
nol 1997; 65: 139-243. 1998; 8: 359-368.
17. Cole CN. Polymavirinae: the viruses and their replication. In: 38. Parkin DM, et al. The global health burden of infection asso-
Fields BD, et al. Virology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia PA: Lippin- ciated cancer. Cancer Surv 1999; 33: 5-33.
cott-Raven, 1996; Vol. 2: 1997-2025. 39. Wong M, et al. New associations of human papillomavirus, Si-
18. Howely RM. Papillomavirine: the viruses and their replication. mian Virus 40 and Epstein-Barr virus with human cancer. J
In: Fields BD, et al. Virology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia PA: Lippin- Nat Canc Inst 2002; 18 94 (24): 1832-1836.
cott-Raven, 1996; Vol. 2: 2045-2076. 40. Chung RT, Liang TJ. Hepatitis C virus and hepatocellular car-
19. Shenk T. Adenoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: cinoma. In: Microbes and Malignacy. Oxford: Oxford Univer-
Fields BD, et al. Virology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia PA: Lippin- sity Press, 1999; 267-288.
cott-Raven, 1996; Vol. 2: 2111-2148. 41. Robinson WS. Hepatitis B virus and hepatocellular carcinoma.
IV. 259

In: Microbes and Malignacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 54. Cohen SM. Infection, cell proliferation and malignancy. In:
1999; 232-266. Microbes and Malignacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
42. Raab-Iraub N. Epstein-Barr virus, lymphoproliferative disease 1999: 89-106.
and nasopharyngaeal carcinoma. In: Microbes and Malignacy. 55. DiMaio D, et al. Virocrine transformation: the intersection
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999; 180-206. between viral transforming proteins and cellular signal trans-
43. Munger K, Howley RM. Human papillomavirus immortaliza- duction pathways. Annu Rev microbiol 1998; 52: 397-421.
tion and transformation functions. Virus Res 2002; 36 (5 Suppl 56. Wilson JB, et al. Expression of EBV nuclear antigen 1 induces
1): 574-83. B cell neoplasia in transgenic mice. EMBO J 1996; 15: 3117-
44. Mortreux F, et al. Molecular ad cellular aspects of HTLV-1 as- 3126.
sociated leukomogenesis in vivo. Leukemia 2003; 17 (1): 26-38. 57. Murakami S. Hepatitis B virus X protein: a multifunctional vi-
45. Boshoff C. Kaposiss sarcoma associated herpesvirus. Cancer ral regulator. J Gastroenterol 2001; 36 (10): 651-60.
surv 1999; 33: 157-190. 58. Ishiji T. Molecular mechanism of carcinogenesis by HPV-16. J
46. Carbone M, et al. Simian virus 40, poliovaccines and human Dermatol 2000; 27 (2): 73-86.
tumors, a review of recent developments. Oncogene 1997; 15: 59. Philpott SM, Buehring GC. Defective DNA repair in cells with
1877-1888. human T-cell leukemia viruses. Role of tax-gene. J Natl Can-
47. Relman DA. Chronic host-parasite interactions. In: Microbes cer Inst 1999; 91: 933-942.
and Malignacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 19-34. 60. Ryu WS. Molecular aspects of hepatitis B viral infection and
48. Smith GL. Virus strategies for evation of the host response to the viral carcinogenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol 1999; 31: 36 (1):
infection. Trends Microbiol 1994; 2: 81-88. 138-143.
49. Schultz TF. Kaposis sarcoma associated herpevirus 8. J Gen 61. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C in the
Virol 1998; 79: 1573-1591. United States. Virus Res 2002; 89 (2): 213-228.
50. Konya J, Dillner J. Immunity to oncogenic human papilloma- 62. Jmrech S, et al. Mechanisms of oncogene perturbation. In:
viruses. Adv Canc Res 2001; 82: 205-38. Oncogenes and Tumor suppressors. Oxford: Oxford University
51. Wild CP, Hall AJ. Hepatitis B virus and liver cancer. Cancer Press, 1997: 3-32.
Surv 1999; 33: 35-54. 63. Herrero R, Monoz N. Human papillomavirus and cancer. Can-
52. Dominguez-Malagon H, Gaytan-Graham S. Hepatocellular car- cer Surv 1999; 33: 191-211.
cinoma: an update.Ultrastruct Pathol 2001; 25 (6): 497-516. 64. Peto J. Cancer epidemiology in the last century and the next
53. Hunter T. Cooperation between oncogenes. Cell 1991; 64: decade. Nature May 2001; 17 (411): 390-395.
249-270.
,

. , .

H OH OE
O -
.
- -
(- . -
o) - -
. -
- .
, -
-
- ,
. ,
-
, - ,
- ,
1. C
4,5. O
-


. ,
, .
-

-

(, -

, ), ,
-
. , - 6.
, . - , -
-
, -
, , ,
- , , -
2. O - 7,8.
- , , -
. ,
, ,
, , -
,
, . -
, - . -
, - , , -
,
.

261
262 OY

, - )10.
,
- , -
- -
.
, . 1 -
O
, - . ,
. - ,
, . .
( -

), , -
,
, (-
11.
, , ) -
2
( , -

-
). . -
, , - -
, ..9.
-
.
- 3
, -
(), , ,
( 4
), (-
- .

1.

()


O











O

: , : , : , : , : -
, :
: Lagiou P, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D. Nutritional epidemiology of cancer: accomplishments and prospects. Proceedings of the
Nutrition Society 2002; 61: 217-222 ()
IV. 263

2.

: , : , : , : , : -
, :
: Lagiou P, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D. Nutritional epidemiology of cancer: accomplishments and prospects. Proceedings of the
Nutrition Society 2002; 61: 217-222 ()

3. -

/ C E


O



(-)


(-)

: , : , : , : , : -
, :
: Lagiou P, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D. Nutritional epidemiology of cancer: accomplishments and prospects. Proceedings of the
Nutrition Society 2002; 61: 217-222 ()

4. -


-
O






,


: , : , : , : , : -
, :
: Lagiou P, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D. Nutritional epidemiology of cancer: accomplishments and prospects. Proceedings of the Nu-
trition Society 2002; 61: 217-222 ()
264 OY

OA OI (, )
- (, -). -
, - ,
. , -
O 1015% .
2545%. -
9 kcal
.
.
0,6 g -

.
(). O -
4 kcal -
-
. 20 , 9
,
,
-
, -
. -
. .
, , , , - O (, D, E, K) -
, , , - ,
. 11 ,
, , , - -
, , , , - . O (B, C), , -
, , . O
9 - , -
, -
. .
O , O
50% 5 6.
. -
4 kcal . - ,
(.. ), -
. . -
- ,
(, , ), -

5.

1. ( ) , , , ,
2. ( -) ,
3. 1 () , , , , ,
4. 2 () , , , ,
5. 3 ( ) , , , ,
6. 6 () , , ,
7. 12 () , , , , ,
8. , , , ,
9. C ( ) , , , ,
10. D , , ,
11. , , ,
, ,
12. , , , , , ,
, , ,

: World Health Organisation, 1998 ( )


IV. 265

6.

1. , , , ,
2. , , , ,
3. , , ,
4. , , ,
5. (), ,
6. , , ,
7. ,
8. ,
9. , , ,
10. , , ,

: World Health Organisation, 1998 ( )

-
. O - ,
, -
- (..
. O -
, ).
. O - -
,
(.. , ) (.. -
). . ,
,
. -
- ,
(, - .
), C, -
(-, , ), ,
, - -
, - 12.
( -
, , )9. . H -
-
OH OH O , -
I O OO- .
O IO -
- : ,
,
. 13.
, -
. , -
, ,
(.. ), - , -
- , ,
(.. HBV) - ,
(.. - . -
). - -
266 OY

7. -

(%)

/ 33
/ / / 31
>3
5
/ / <9
/ 6
/ 5
5

: Adami O, Day NE, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC. Primary and secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality.
European Journal of Cancer 2001; 37: S118-S127 ()


, , .
( ) - ,
PSA ( ),
- .
14. ...
7 -
- 20% 16.
, -
-
. - 17.
, -
-
(.. ), - . -
,
- /
. .

IO: I O OHO 1/10 . -
- -
- , -
. 18.
-
18%
15. H - (, , )
-
- -

- .
. ,
. - 10.000.000 19.
, -
- ..., ,
, , 1950 1996,
, ,
IV. 267

400 kg,
20. , o 33.
- .
, , (ADH3,
CYP2E1), -
, .
21.
, -
IO OH OO 34.
O A -
390.000 ,
- , -
, , -
, -
21. - -
35.
, -
, - -
, - ,
.
,
/ , - (-
- ), --
22,23. -28,36.
,
KIO O OOAO
5070%24. - O
, , . , . -
C , -, , - 37. --
25. M -
1 , ,
mol/L - 84% -
, - 38. -
, -
, . -
C, - , -
,
26-28. E , ,
, , , , -
29. 39,40. -
- , -
-
/ , - , , -
- -
30,31. - 41. To
-
, - , , -
32. 50100 -
100 kg 42,43. -
-
, . -
268 OY

, -
, , , .. -
... - ,
44,45. H - , , -
- ,
46,47. - , o , -
, 56.
- - ,
. 80% -
69 , ,

-- 54.
- ( ) - -
--, - ,
- - -
(), .
--, -
- ,
48,49. -
,
IO TOY OAO
O , - , -
(resveratrol)57,58.
4 , - 59.
-
. -
800.000900.000 - -
37. - 1,5 2,560.
, ..., -
, 50. O -
- (BMI). O -
, -
,
- 61,62.
51. -
- -
50% , - -
, . -
, C ,
-
, - 63. -
52,53. A - -
- ,
-
, 70% - -
- 64.
54. O -
- Helicobacter pylori
, -
55. . 71% -
, -
IV. 269

,
. pylori65. - -
2,9% 1.246 . pylori
7,8 - , -
, -
280 - 76-78. O
66. - -
-
. pylori. - .
. pylori
, - -
,
, - 79,80.
- -
- , -
. pylori 67, - -
68. -
,
IO TOY EO EO -
O () - 81,82.
- -
...69. -
, - ,
. , -
..., , -
70. O - .
- -
- , , -
.
To , - , ,
-
, 2,783. -
71,72. .
, 15
, 20% , -
, - - 84. -
73. -
- 85.
- -
, , - ,
74,75. E - ,
- DNA ( -
- ), -
, - DNA86,87.
, -
,
-
. - 86,88. -
,
-
, , - . -
270 OY

(Body Mass Index BMI) 99. -


, , -
- -
. 22,4, 2,4 -
86,89. 100.
... -
, 101.
, -
- ,
. (Thorotrast),
- , -
- ,
90. ,
-
KIO O HO
OO 102,
103.
O -
. O - H
,
, - , -
, 70. 80% , -
- (TCE)
37.
- 104,105.
- A -
()91. - , ,
- 106,107.
,
(HBsAg)92. O - IO O EO
- 200.000 -
. - 70. -
, -
1 - ( ) - (
100.000 ) -
1 - , 108 ( -
, - ).
1 - - To
- -
93,94. ,
M 20%
- 109,110. To
,
- ,
1 , , -
111,112.
95- , -
97.
To 1988 o O , ,
(IARC) - 113,114.
- ,
98. ,
IV. 271

. - -
O- , -
(IARC) . O -
11,2 ,
: - 23,2 , 50
38 -
, - .
- , -
. - 124. H -
115. E-

, ,
116,117. - 125. T
-
-
- -
, -
118. 126,127.
H - -
, ,
- 3 128. 5
119,120. -
- , -
- 20 -
, , 129,130.
- -
121,122. ,
- 1980131. -
, - ,
- -
( ) -
80% , -
, - 2025%132-134.
. - -
-
6% ,
123. -
. ,
KIO O YO -
O - , -
,
, -
, - , 135.
. -
, 136.
37. O - Y
-

, - 137.

. O ,
272 OY

, -
, ,
, - , (-
. - ), , , , -
, , ,
(.. - 148. O
) -
, ,
, - -
138. - 149. E -
, -
-
, , --
- , -
139. , -
- -
, , -
> 100 rad150,151.

. A IO O A
- 140.000 -
- 1990,
, 5/6 37. -
140,141. , -
, , . ,
. 70.

O
, -
,
-
152. H -
3080%140. ,
,
- -
-
, ,
-
-
140.
142.
, , -

153.
,
, , C, IO O O
-
O -
143-145. ,
- . -
, ,
..., , , , -
-
154.
146,147.
O KIO O EO
- -
. O - 155. O
510% -
, .
IV. 273

...
70. , -
. - , -
, -
. , ..., -
. , - 170.
156.
37% - KIO O OY
, , O -
, - 795.000 -
157. , , 1990
, - 172. O
- . ,
, - 70. M -
, -
, 158-160. -
,
161.
, -
-
162. 12 173,174.
- -
.
- 175.
, -
- :
,
- (.. ),
163-164.
, -
, -
165-167. H - 176.
- -
120 36 -
, - ,
, (relative risk = 1,5) -
168. - , -
- -
177,
169. 178. -
, - -
, - ,
170,171. -
, - . ,
, , -
179.
, - -
, , -
, , 5

. - 2180. -
274 OY

- 192.
, , -,
C. - - ,
,
, C, -
- , 193,194. -
-, -
181,182. -
- , -
, -
- , -
, 195.
, ,
. (isoflavones) - (DDT) -
, (PCBs).
-
183. -- -
DDT PCBs .
,
184. -
.
,
-. KIO O OY O A
-
O
40% -
, -
185.
196. -
O -
,
-

, - -
.
186. O () -

-
- -
, , -
-
187,188. - 197.

IO O HO H
189. -
- O
, , -
. O
, , , ,
, . ,
. - . , . , 37.
- -
, -
. 30, 198.
-
,
190,191. .
- 4 - uman Papilloma Virus
- (HPV)
IV. 275

199. - .
-
HPV() 200. - , -
- .
, - -
201. , - -
. , -
, - -
- -
- 207.
37,140. , -
, -
-, C , ,
- -
37,203. 208. -
-
IO O OIO 209. -
O 4% , -
- , -
, 203. O -
. - ,
70. - 210,211.
-
, , KIO O
- O -
204. -
70.
. - -
, - -
, - , -
- , -
. - , -
-
, - 14%
205. 212,213.

- -
, ,
, -
206.
214-216.
, , -
, -
, -
, 217. -
, - , -
. -
- . -
. -
- , -
, , -
276 OY

, 228.
218,219. -
-
IO O OA ,
O
- 229,
230. O -
, 70. -
, .. ...,
. , - , -
220. -
-
231,232.
221. - , ,
, -
, - , -
, -
. , -
, -
: 233,234.
, , -
, - -
-
DNA. - : ,

,
, -
235,236. ,
222-224.
H -
, .
,
- , -
, , , -
, 237.

225,226. ..., IO O
4 - O , -
,
. , -
, .
, ,
. -
227. 1525
O -
. O
, - -
, 3050%, -
. , - , -
, - , 30
- , -
70. . -
IV. 277

, 50. T , -
- 248. -
238. -
, , - , -
(, , -
, )
249. , pH ,
239. -
, -
IO OOOO Y
O DNA 250. pH -
. . -
70. - ,
.
. -

, . - ,
251.
192040, , -

-
240. . -
-
, -
. 252. -
- -
241-243. 253,254.
O H ,
, -
20 , - ,
20% -
5 . 255. -
-
20 -
241. -
O 256.

, -
, - . O -
- , ,
, , 48%
, - -
244. - 257. O , --
, - , , - 4--

245,246. -
(..
- , )258-260.
247. , - , -
, , -
, , - ,
278 OY

261. -
, -
- , , -
, 271,272.
,
. - , ...,
,
262. -
- 273.
- -
-
. O -
- 274.
, -
263,264. - -
, - 275,276. O
. ,
. E -
- .
-
110 g/l, . -
- , -
265,266. , -
.
IO O OY
2000 189.000 - 277.
, ,
2% . O - IO O AO
- O
. . , , . - . .
, . , . 70.
70. M -
M , -
, - -
- 278.
. (cured) -
-
- , -
- -, -
267,268.
-
279-283.

, - , -
- , -
, , , -
269. 284,285.
, -, -
- - ,
-
270. /
IV. 279

286.
H -
- 296,297. , -
- -
, , -
, , - , ,
287,288. E -
- , -
-
- 298.
290,291. -
- ,
291. 299,300.
H (> 20 ) -
, , -
, 292. ,
, -
IO O OOY 301,302.
O , , -
, . - -
-
1,7/100.000 / 4,7 , -
293. H - 303.
-
(screening)
- . O -
. , -
,
,
- ,
(TSH), - 1 Sv (Sievert). -
294. , - 4 Sv, -

. O -
50%, -
- -
295. , -
O - 20 304.
,
. , ,
-,
, -
- 305.
( ). , -
, - HODGKINS HODGKINS
Hodgkin (D)
Thomas Hodgkin (17981866). -
. , 8% . -
Hodgkin
, - ,
, - , -
280 OY

, ..., , O- -
..70. , 315-318.
- -
. Hodgkins (NHL), , ,
, -
, .
2,5% O -
306. , -
23 / 100.000 / 14 / 100.000 , -
...70. -
NHL 319,320. -
, 34% , - , -
307. , ,
O - -
-
Hodgkin, - -
- ,
NHL308-310. - 321,322.
- -
HD NHL
. . -
- - Gray (1 Gy =
- 100 rad),
- Sievert (1 Sv = 100 rems).
HD , -
6 - (linear energy
, transfer = LET), -
311. -, 1 Gy 1 Sv. -
- LET, .. -
, -
. , -
- ,
- 1 Sv.
HD. -
- ,
HD (LET = 1 Sv),
NHL312. . LET,
-, -
I , 323,324.
- -
, 1/3 - ,
, 313. ,
- 12 rad,
, - 325.
, , -
- -
70. - ,
326.
314. H
, - -
, , ,
IV. 281

8. 2000, -
2020

, 2000 , 2020 , 2020

25 100 60
15 100 30
/ 10 30 1020
/ 0 0 0
/ 10 20 10
0 15 5
/ 5 30 15
0 0 0
5 20 10
30 60 45
20 50 30
5 15 10
0 15 5

, -
-
. . 8
-
- -
327,328. 2000,
,
OH OH H .
O IO

O -
- 13%, -
. , - 6% (2000, -
, - ). O , 20
, - ,
. - 30% -
4% -
- 329.


1. Trichopoulos D, Petridou E. Epidemiologic Studies and Can- vard Report on Cancer Prevention, Volume 1: Causes of Hu-
cer Etiology in Humans. Med Exerc Nutr Health 1994; 3: 206- man Cancer. Cancer Causes and Control 1996; 7, Suppl. 1: 1-
225. 59.
2. World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Can- 6. Lagiou P, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D. Nutritional epide-
cer Research. Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: miology of cancer: accomplishments and prosprects. Proceed-
A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute ings of the Nutrition Society 2002; 61: 217-222.
for Cancer Research, 1997. 7. Katsougiannni K, Skalkidis , Petridou E, et al. Diet and Pe-
3. World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Can- ripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: The role of Poly-, Mono-,
cer Research. Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: and Saturated Fatty Acids. Am J Epid 1991; 133: 24-31.
A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute 8. Petridou E, Trichopoulos D. Epidemiology and etiology of hu-
for Cancer Research, 1997. man neoplasms. Archives of Hellenic Medicine 1996; 13: 252-
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1994. 273.
5. nternational Agency for Research on Cancer, 1987. Colditz 9. A, . . : -
G, DeJong W, Hunter, Trichopoulos D, Willett W, eds. Har- , , .
282 OY

& . 2 . : , 2000: 399- 28. World Cancer Research Fund in association with American
426. Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition and the Pre-
10. Willet WC, Trichopoulos D. Nutrition and cancer: a summary vention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: A-
of the evidence. Cancer Causes and Control 1996; 7: 178-180. merican Institute for Cancer Research, 1997: 96-106.
11. Lagiou P, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D. Nutritional epide- 29. Soler M, Bosetti C, Franceschi S, et al. Fiber intake and the
miology of cancer: accomplisments and prospects. Proceedings risk of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal cancer. Int J Cancer
of the Nutrition Society 2002; 61: 217-222. 2001; 91: 283-7.
12. Adami HO, Day NE, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC. Primary 30. Franceschi S, Favero A, Conti E, et al. Food groups oils and
and secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidity butter, and Cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx. Br J Cancer
and mortality. European Journal of Cancer 2001; 37: S118- 1999a; 80: 614-20. Francsceschi S, Levi F, Conti E, et al. Ener-
S127. gy intake and dietary pattern in cancer of the oral cavity and
13. Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention. Harvard report on can- pharynx. Cancer Causes Control 1999b; 10: 439-44.
cer prevention, Volume 2: Prevention of human cancer. Pre- 31. Petridou E, Zavras A, Lefatzis D, et al. The Role of Diet and
vention of tobacco use. Cancer Causes and Control 1997; 8 Specific Micronutritients in the Etiology of Oral Carcinoma.
(Suppl. 1): S5-S12. Trichopoulos D, Petridou E, Lipworth L, et Cancer 2002; 94: 2981-88.
al. Epidemiology of Cancer. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Ro- 32. Horn-Ross PL, Morrow M, Ljung BM. Diet and the risk of sa-
senberg SA, et al, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of On- livary gland cancer. Am J Jepidemiol 1997; 146: 171-6.
cology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 231-257. 33. Franco EL, Kowalski LP, Oliveira BV, Curado MP, et al. Risk
14. Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P, Kuper H, Trichopoulos D. Cancer factors for oral cancer in Brazil: a case-control study. Int J
and Mediterranean dietary traditions. Cancer Epidemiol Bio- Cancer 1989; 43: 992-1000.
markers Prev 2000; 9: 869-873. 34. Dong YJ, Peng TK, Yin SJ. Expression and activities of alco-
15. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the world can- hol dehydrogenase in human mouth. Alcohol 1996; 13: 257-62.
cer burden: GLOBOCAN 2000. Int J Cancer 2001; 94: 153-6. 35. Wight A, Ogden GR. Possible mechanisms by which alcohol
16. Hankey BF, Feuer EJ, Clegg LX, et al. Cancer surveillance se- may influence the development of oral cancer a review. Oral
ries: interpreting trends in prostate cancer- part I: evidence of Oncol 1998; 34: 441-7.
the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer evidence, 36. Yu MC. Diet and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. FEMS Micro-
mortality and survival rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1017- biol Immunol 1990; 2: 235-42.
24. 37. Parkin M, Pizani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide inci-
17. Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman WP. Autopsy diagnoses of dence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer 1999; 80: 827-
malignant neoplasms. JAMA 1998; 280: 1245-48. 41.
18. Murray CJL, Lopez AD, eds. The Global Burden of Disease. 38. , . -
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996a. . : , ,
. & . 2 .
19. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer stati-
: , 2000: 137.
stics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50: 7-33.
39. Launoy G, Milan CH, Faivre J, et al. Alcohol, tobacco and oe-
20. Bailar JC 3rd, Gornik HL. Cancer undefeated. N Engl J Med
sophageal cancer: effects of the duration of consumption mean
1997; 336: 1569-74.
intake and current and former consumption. Br J J Cancer
21. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, et al. GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer 1997; 75: 1389-96.
Incidence, Mortality and Precalence Worldwide. International 40. Lagergren J, Bergstrm R, Lindgren, et al. The role of tobac-
Agency for Research on Cancer, 2001. co, snuff and alcohol use in the aetiology of cancer of the oeso-
22. Muscat JE, Richie JP Jr, Thomson S, et al. Gender differences phagus and gastric cardia. Int J Cancer 2000a; 85: 340-6.
in smoking and risk for oral cancer. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 41. Castellsque X, Munoz N, De Stefani E, et al. Independent and
5192-7. joint effects of tobacco in men and women. Int J Cancer 1999;
23. Blot WJ, Mc Laughlin JK, Winn DM, et al. Smoking and drin- 82: 657-64.
king in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res 42. Brown LM, Hoover RN, Greenberg RS, et al. Are racial deffe-
1988; 48: 3282-7. rences in squamous cell esophageal cancer explained by alco-
24. De Stefani E, Deneo-Pelegrini H, Mendilaharsu M, et al. Diet hol and tobacco use? J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 1340-5.
and risk of cancer of the upper aeredigestive tract-I. Foods. 43. Zambon P, Talamini R, La Vecchia C, et al. Smoking, type of
Oral Oncol 1999; 35: 17-21. alcoholic beverage and squamous-cell esophageal cancer in
25. La Vecchia C, Tavani A, Franceschi S, et al. Epidemiology and northern Italy. Int J Cancer 2000; 86: 144-9.
prevention of oral cancer. Oral Oncol 1997; 33: 302-12. 44. Gammon MD, Schoenberg JB, Ahsan H, et al. Tobacco, alco-
26. Nagao T, Ikeda N, Warnakulasuriya S, et al. Serum antioxi- hol and socioeconomic status and adenocarcinomas of the eso-
dant micronutritients and the risk of oral leukoplakia among phagus and gastric cardia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1277-
Japanese. Oral Oncol 2000; 36: 466-70. 84.
27. Sawant SS, Kandrkar SV. Role of Vitamins C and E as chemo- 45. Lagergren J, Bergstrm R, Lindgren A, et al. The role of to-
preventive agents in the hamster cheek pouch treated with oral bacco, snuff and alcohol use in the aetiology of cancer of the
carcinogen- DMBA. Oral Dis 2000; 6: 241-7. oesophagus and gastric cardia. Int J Cancer 2000a; 85340-6.
IV. 283

46. Jaskiewicz K, Marasas WF, Lazarus C, et al. Association of in gastric cancer established by CagA Immunoblot as a marker
esophageal cytological abnormalities with vitamin and lipotro- of past infection. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 784-9.
pe deficiences in populations at risk for esophageal cancer. 66. Uemura N, Olamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Helicobacter pylo-
Anticancer Res 1988; 8: 711-15. ri infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J
47. Cheng KK, Day NE. Nutrition and esophageal cancer. Cancer Med 2001; 345: 784-9.
Causes Control 1996; 7: 33-40. 67. Ekstrm AM, Held M, Hansson LE, et al. Helicobacter pylori
48. Wu Y, Chen J, Ohshima H, et al. Geographic association bet- in gastric cancer established by CagA Immunoblot as a marker
ween urinary excretion of N-nitroso compouds and oesopha- of past infection. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 784-9.
geal cancer mortality in China. Int J Cancer 1993; 54: 713-19. 68. Correa P, Fontham ET, Bravo JC, et al. Chemoprevention of
49. Cheng KK, Day NE, Duffy SW, et al. Pickled vegetables in the gastric dysplasia: randomized trial of antioxidant supplements
aetiology of oesophageal cancer in Hong Kong Chinese. Lan- and anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;
cet 1992; 339: 1314-18. 92: 1881-8.
50. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, et al. Cancer Incidence in 69. American Cancer Society, 2001.
five Continents. Vol. VII. Lyon: International Agency for Re- 70. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2000:
search on Cancer, 1997. Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide, Ver-
51. Mirvish SS. The etiology of gastric cancer. Intragastric nitrosa- sion 1.0. IARC CancerBase No. 5. Lyon: International Agency
mide formation and other theories. J Natl Cancer Inst 1983; for Research on Cancer, 2001.
71: 629-647. 71. Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, et al. A prospective
52. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit and cancer preven- study of cigarette smoking and the risk of colorectal adenoma
tion: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996; 96: 1027-39. and colorectal in U.S. men. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994a; 86: 183-
91.
53. Terry P, Lagergren J, Ye W, et al. Inverse association between
intake of cereal fiber and risk of gastric cardia cancer. Gastro- 72. Tavani A, Gallus, Negri E, et al. Cigarette smoking and risk of
enterology 2001; 120: 387-91. cancers of the colon and rectum: a case-control study from
Italy. Eur J Epidemiol 1998; 14: 675-81.
54. Nyrn O, Adami HO. Stomach cancer. In: Adami HO, Hunter
D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. New 73. Potter JD. Colorectal cancer: molecules and populations. J
York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 173-174. Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 916-32.
74. Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostik RM, et al. Colon cancer: review
55. Kono S, Hirohata T. Nutrition and stomach cancer. Cancer
of the epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 499-545.
Causes Control 1996; 7: 41-55.
75. Howe GR, Benito E, Castellato, et al. Dietary intake of fiber
56. RC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
and dicreased risk of cancers of the colon and rectum: eviden-
Risks to Humans. Some natural occurring substances: food
ce from the combined analysis of 13 case-control studies. J
items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and my-
Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84: 1887-96.
cotoxins. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chen Hum 1993;
76. Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz G, et al. Relationship of
56: 165-95.
diet to risk of colorectal adenoma in men. J Natl Cancer Inst
57. Franceschi S, La Vecchia C. Alcohol and the risk of cancers of
1992; 84: 91-8.
the stomach and colon- rectum. Dig Dis 1994; 12: 276-89.
77. Mac Lennan R, Macrae F, Bain C, et al. Randomized trial of
58. Ye W, Ekstrm AM, Hansson LE, et al. Tobacco, alcohol and
intake of fat, fiber, and beta carotene to prevent colorectal a-
the risk of gastric cancer by sub-site snd histologic type. Int J denomas. J Natl Canc Inst 1995; 87: 1760-6.
Cancer 1999; 83: 223-9.
78. Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D, et al. Lack of a low-fat, high-
59. Lopez-Carrillo L, Lopez-Cervantes M, Ramirez-Espitia A, et fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Pre-
al. Alcohol consumption and gastric cancer in Mexico. Cad vention Trial Study Group. N Engl Med 2000; 342: 1149-55.
Saude Publica 1998; 14: 25-32.
79. White E, Shonnon JS, Patterson RE. Relation between vita-
60. Tredaniel J, Bofetta P, Buiatti E, et al. Tobacco smoking and min and calcium supplement use and colon cancer. Cancer E-
gastric cancer: review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 1997; 72: pidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6: 769-74.
565-73. 80. Whelan RL, Horvath KD, Gleason NR, et al. Vitamin and cal-
61. Hansson LE, Baron J, Nyrn O, et al. Early-life risk indicators cium supplument use in associated with decreased adenoma
of gastric cancer. A population-based case-control study in Swee- recurrence in patients with a previous history of neoplasia. Dis
den. Int J Cancer 1994; 57: 32-7. Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 212-17.
62. Lagergren J, Bergstrm R, Nyrn O. Association between bo- 81. Willet WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Relation of meat
dy mass and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric car- fat and fiber intake to the risk of colon cancer in a prospective
dia. Ann Intern Med 1999b; 130: 883-90. study among women. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1664-72.
63. Nakamura K. Stomach cancer in atomic-bomb survivors. Lan- 82. John D, Potter Hunter D. Colorectal cancer. n: Adami HO,
cet 1977; 2: 866-7. Hunter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiolo-
64. Darby SC, Radford EP, Whitley E. Radon exposure and can- gy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 199.
cers other than lung cancer in Swedish iron miners. Environ 83. Gerhardsson de Verdier M, Hagman U, et al. Meat, cooking
Health Perspect 1995; 103 Suppl 2: 45-7. methods and colorectal cancer: a case-referent study in Stock-
65. Ekstrm AM, Held M, Hansson LE, et al. Helicobacter pylori holm. Int J Cancer 1991; 49: 520-25.
284 OY

84. Baron JA, Beach M, Mandel JS, et al. Calcium supplements 502.
for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Pre- 102. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Overall Eva-
vention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 101-7. luations of Carcinogenity: An Updating of IARC Monographs
85. Bostick RM, Fosdick L, Wood JR, et al. Calcium and colore- 1-42. IARC Monogr Ecal Carcinog Risk Humans. Suppl 7.
ctal erithelial cell proliferation in sporadic adenoma patients: a Lyon: IARC, 1987.
randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 103. Thompson DE, Mabuchi K, Ron E, et al. Cancer incidence in
J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 7: 1307-15. atomic bomb survivors. Part II: solid tumors, 1958-1987. Ra-
86. WCRF Panel (Potter JD, Chair). Diet, Nutrition, and the Pre- diat Res 1994; 137: 517-67.
vention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. World Cancer Re- 104. Chen CJ, Yu MW, Liaw YF, et al. Epidemiological characte-
search Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Wa- ristics and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastro-
shington, DC, 1997, chapter 4.10. enterol Hepatol 1997; 12(Suppl): S294-308.
87. Farinati F, Espina N, Lieber CS, et al. In vivo inhibition by 105. Wartenberg D, Reyner D, Scott CS. Trichloroethylene and
chronic ethanol exposure of methylguanine transferase activity cancer: epidemiologic evidence. Environ Health Perspect 2000;
and DNA repair. Ital J Gastroenterol 1985; 17: 48-9. 108: 161-76.
88. Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostick RM, et al. Colon Cancer: a re- 106. Zatonksi WA, Lowenfels AB, Boyle P, et al. Epidemiologic
view of epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 499-545. aspects of gallbladder cancer: a case-control study of the
89. Mckeown-Eyssen G. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revi- SEARCH Program of the International Agency for Research
seted: are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated on Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1132-8.
with risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994; 3: 687-95. 107. World Cancer Research Fund, Food, Nutrition and the Pre-
90. Slattery ML, Pottery JD, Curtin K, et al. Energy balance and vention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. Washington, DC: A-
colon cancer-beyond physical activity. Cancer Res 1997a; 57: merican Institute for Cancer Research, 1997.
75-80.
108. Ekbom A, Hunter D. Pancreatic Cancer. In: Adami O, Hun-
91. Austin H. The role of tobacco use and alcohol consumption in ter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology.
the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. In: Tabor E, Di Bis- New York: Oxford University Press, 2000: 234.
ceglie AM, Purcell RH, eds. Etiology, Pathology, and Treat-
109. Boyle P, Maisonneuve P, Bueno de Mesquita B, et al. Ciga-
ment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in North America. Vol. 13.
rette smoking and pancreas cancer: a case control study of the
Houston: Advances in Applied Biotechnology Series, 1991: 57-
search programme of the IARC. Int J Cancer 1996; 67: 63-71.
75.
110. Fernadez E, La Vecchia C, Decarli A. Attributable risks for
92. Trichopoulos D, Mac Mahon B, Sparros L, et al. Smoking and
pancreatic cancer in northern Italy. Cancer Epidemiol Bio-
hepatitis B-negative primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl
markers Prev 1996; 5: 23-7.
Cancer Inst 1980; 65: 111-14.
93. Harpel PC. Protease inhibitors: A precarious balance. New 111. Hecht SS, Carmell SG, Foiles PG, et al. Tobacco-specific ni-
Engl J Med 1983; 309: 725-26. trosamine adducts: studies in laboratory animals and humans.
Environ Health Perspect 1993; 99: 57-63.
94. Petridou E, Chapuis-Cellier C, Roukas K, et al. Tobacco Smok-
ing and Other Factors in Relation to Serum Alpha-1-Anti- 112. Rivenson A, Hoffmann D, Prokopczyk B, et al. Induction of
trypsin. Human Biology 1993; 65: 425-32. lung and exocrine pancreas tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-
specific and Areca-derived N-nitrosamines. Cancer Res 1988;
95. Yeh F-S, Yu MC, Mo C-C, et al. Hepatitis B virus, aflatoxins,
and hepatocellular carcinoma in Southern Guangxi, China. 48: 6912-17.
Cancer Res 1989; 49: 2506-9. 113. Howe GR, Burch JD. Nutrition and pancreatic cancer. Can-
96. Ross PK, Yuan JM, Yu MC, et al. Urinary aflatoxin biomar- cer Causes Control 1996; 7: 69-82.
kers and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 1992; 339: 114. Giovannucci E. Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene,
943-6. and cancer: review of the epidemiologic leterature. J Natl Can-
97. Srivatanakul P, Parkin DM, Khlat M, et al. Liver cancer in cer Inst 1999; 91: 317-31.
Thailand, II. A case-control study of hepatocellular carcinoma. 115. Gordis L. Consumption of methylxanthine-containing bevera-
Int J Cancer 1991; 48: 329-32. ges and the risk of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett 1990; 52: 1-
98. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Alcohol Drink- 12.
ing. IARC Monogr Ecal Carcinog Risk Humans. Vol. 44. Lyon: 116. Alcohol and pancreatic cancer in blacks and whites in the
IARC, 1988. United States. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 4899-905.
99. Adami HO, Hsing AW, McLaughlin JK, et al. Alcoholism and 117. Farrow DC, Davis S. Risk of pancreatic cancer in relation to
liver chirrhosis in the etiology of primary liver cancer. Int J medical history and the use of tobacco, alcohol and coffee. Int
Cancer 1992; 51: 898-902. J Cancer 1990b; 45: 816-20.
100. Kuper H, Ye W, Broom U, et al. The risk of liver and bile 118. Veenstra J, Sckenkel JA, Van Erp- Baart AM, et al. Alcohol
duct cancer in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, alcoho- consumption in relation to food intake and smoking habits in
lism, or cirrhosis. Hepatology 2001; 34: 714-8. the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey. Eur J Clin
101. Kuper H, Tzonou A, Kaklamani E, et al. Tobacco smoking, Nutr 1993; 47: 482-9.
alcohol consumption, and their interactions in the causation 119. Friedman GD, van den Eeden SK. Risk factors for pancreatic
of the hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2000b; 85: 498- cancer: an exploratory study. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22: 30-7.
IV. 285

120. Kalapathaki V, Tzonou A, Hsieh CC, et al. Tobacco, ethanol, tries. In: Samet JM, ed. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer. Lung
coffee, pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, and cholelithiasis as Biology in Health and Disease. Vol. 74. New York: Marcel
risk factors for pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Causes Control Dekker, 1994: 151-84.
1993; 4: 375-82. 140. World Cancer Research Fund. Lung. In: Food, Nutrition and
121. Matanoski GM, Seltser R, Sartwell PE, et al. The current the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective (Part II, Can-
mortality rates of radiologists and other physician specialists: cers, Nutrition and Food). Washington, DC: American Insti-
specific causes of death. Am J Epidemiol 1975; 101: 199-210. tute for Cancer Research, 1997: 130-47.
122. Smith PG, Doll R. Mortality from cancer and all causes 141. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Vitamin A.
among British radiologists. Br J Radiol 1981; 54: 187-94. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Vol. 3. Lyon: IARC,
123. Ojajarvi IA, Partanen TJ, Ahlbom A, et al. Occupational ex- 1998b.
posures and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Occup Envi- 142. Lotan R. Lung cancer promotion by beta carotene and tobac-
ron Med 2000; 57: 316-24. co smoke: relationship to suppression of retinoic acid recep-
124. Boffetta P, Pershagen G, Jckel KH, et al. Cigar and pipe tor-beta and increased activator protein-1? J Natl Cancer Inst
smoking and lung cancer risk: a multicenter study from Euro- 1999; 91: 7-9.
pe. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 697-701. 143. Garcia-Closas R, Agudo A, Gonzalez CA, et al. Intake of spe-
125. Doll R, Peto R. Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: cific carotenoids and flavonoids and the risk of lung cancer in
dose and time relationships among regular smokers and life- women in Barcelona, Spain. Nutr Cancer 1998; 32: 154-8.
long non-smokers. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1978; 32: 144. Knekt P, Jarvinen R, Seppanen R, et al. Dietary flavonoids
303-313. and the risk of lung cancer and other malignant neoplasms.
126. Wynder EL, Kabat GC. The effect of low-yield cigarette Am J Epidemiol 1997; 146: 223-30.
smoking on lung cancer risk. Cancer 1988; 62: 1223-30. 145. Zhou B, Wang T, Sun G, et al. A case-control study of the re-
127. Lubin JH, Blot WJ, Berrino F, et al. Patterns of lung cancer lationship between dietary factors and risk of lung cancer in
risk according to type of cigarette smoked. Int J Cancer 1984; women of Shenyang, China. Oncol Rep 1999; 6: 139-43.
33: 569-76. 146. Sinha R, Kulldorff M, Curtin J, et al. Fried, well-done red
128. Lubin JH, Blot WJ, Berrino F, et al. Patterns of lung cancer meat and risk of lung cancer in women (United States). Can-
cer Causes Control 1998; 9: 621-30.
risk according to type of cigarette smoked. Int J Cancer 1984;
33: 569-76. 147. Swanson CA, Brown CC, Brownson RC, et al. Re: Saturated
fat intake and lung cancer risk among nonsmoking women in
129. Doll R, Peto R. Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma:
Missuri. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1724-5.
dose and time relationships among regular smokers and life-
long non-smokers. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1978; 32: 148. International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs,
303-313. Vols. 1-77 (IARC, 1972-2001).
130. Hammond EC. Smoking in relation to the death rates of one 149. Hughes JM, Weill H. Asbestos and man-made fibers. In: Sa-
million men and women. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1966; 19: met JM, ed. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer. Lung Biology in
Health and Disease, Vol. 74. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994:
127-204.
185-205.
131. Trichopoulos D, Kalandidi A, Sparros L, MacMahon B. Lung
150. Lubin JH, Boice JD, Edling C, et al. Radon and lung cancer
cancer and passive smoking. Int J Cancer 1981; 27: 1-4.
risk: a joint analysis of 11 underground miner studies. In: Pu-
132. alandidi A, Katsouyanni K, Voropoulou N, et al. Passive
blic Health Service and National Institute of Health, eds. NIH
smoking and diet in the etiology of lung cancer among non-
Pub. No. 94-3644. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
smokers. Cancer Causes Control 1990; 1: 15-21.
Health and Human Services, 1994.
133. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK. Passive smoking and lung cancer 151. Boice DJ Jr, Land CE, Preston DL. Ionizing radiation. In:
risk: what is the story now? J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1416- Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology
17. and Prevention. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press,
134. Boffetta P, Agudo A, Ahrens W, et al. Multicenter case-con- 1996: 319-54.
trol study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and 152. Austin DF, Reynolds P. Laryngeal cancer. In: Schottenfeld D,
lung cancer in Europe. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1440-50. Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention.
135. Fang JL, Vaca CE. Detection of DNA adducts of acetaldeyde 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996: 619-36.
in peripheral white blood cells of alcohol abusers. Carcinoge- 153. nternational Agency for Research on Cancer. Occupational
nesis 1997; 18: 627-32. exposures to mists and vapours from sulfuric acid and other
136. Adami HO, McLaughlin JK, Hsing AW, et al. Alcoholism and strong inorganic acids. In: Occupational Exposures to Mists
cancer risk: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Causes and Vapours from Strong Inorganic Acids and Other Indu-
Control 1992; 3: 419-25. strial Chemicals. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of
137. Katsouyanni K, Pershagen G. Ambient air pollution exposure Carcinogenic Riskw to Humans. Vol. 54. Lyon: IARC, 1992:
and cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8: 284-91. 41-119.
138. Nyberg F, Gustavsson P, Jarup L, et al. Urban air pollution 154. Peto J, Hodgson JT, Matthews FE, et al. Cantinuing increase
and lung cancer in Stockholm. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 487-95. in mesothelioma mortality in Britain. Lancet 1995; 345: 535-9.
139. Smith KR, Liu Y. Indoor air pollution in developing coun- 155. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Mono-
286 OY

graphs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. ter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology.
Vol. 55, Solar and Ultraviolet Radiation. Lyon: IARC, 1992. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 309.
156. Whiteman DC, Green AC. Melanoma and sun exposure: where 177. Howe GR, Hirohata T, Hislop TG, et al. Dietary factors and
are we now? Int J Dermatol 1999; 38: 481-9. risk of breast cancer: combined analysis of 12 case-control
157. Armstrong BK, Kricker A. Cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Surv studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 561-9.
1994; 19-20: 219-40. 178. Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Adami HO, et al. Cohort studies
158. Hunter DH, Golditz G, Stampfer M, et al. Risk factors for of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer- a pooled analysis.
basal cell carcinoma in a prospective cohort of women. Ann N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 356-61.
Epidemiol 1990; 1: 13-23. 179. Willet WC, Rockhill B, Hankinson SE, et al. Non-genetic fa-
159. van Dam RM, Huang Z, Rimm EB, et al. Risk factors for ba- ctors in the causation of breast cancer. In: Harris J, Lippman
sal cell carcinoma of the skin in men: results from the health ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK, eds. Diseases of the Breast.
professionals follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 50: 459- Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Press, 2000: 175-220.
68. 180. Zhang S, Hunter DJ, Forman MR, et al. Dietary carotenoids
160. Moore S, Johnson N, Pierce A, et al. The epidemiology of lip and vitamins A, C and E and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Can-
cancer: a review of global incidence and etiology. Oral Dis cer Inst 1999a; 91: 547-56.
1999; 5: 185-95. 181. Hunter DJ, Willet WC. Diet, body size, and breast cancer. E-
161. Green A, Bain C, McLennan R, et al. Risk factors for cuta- pidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 110-32.
neous melanoma in Queensland. Recent Results Cancer Res 182. Howe GR, Hirohata T, Hislop TG, et al. Dietary factors and
1986; 102: 76-97. risk of breast cancer: combined analysis of 12 case-control
162. Green A, Trichopoulos D. Skin Cancer. In: Adami O, Hunter studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 561-9.
D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. New 183. Fournier DB, Erdman JW Jr, Gordon GB. Soy, its compo-
York: Oxford University Press; 2000: 288. nents, and cancer prevention: a review of the in vitro, animal,
163. Sahl W, Glore S. Basal cell carcinoma and lifestyle characteri- and human data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998; 7:
stics. Int J Dermatol 1995; 34: 398-402. 1055-65.
164. Ringborg U. Alcohol and risk of cancer. Alcohol Clin Exp 184. Wu AH, Ziegler RG, Nomura AM, et al. Soy intake and risk
Res 1988; 22: 3235-3285. of breast cancer in Asians and Asian Americans. Am J Clin
165. Whiteman DC, Green AC. Melanomas and sun exposure: Nutr 1998; 68: 1437S-1443S.
where are we now? Int J Dermatol 1999; 38: 481-9. 185. Longnecker MP. Alcoholic beverage consumption in relation
166. Armstrong BK. Epidemiology of malignant melanoma: inter- to risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis and review. Cancer Cau-
mittent or total accumulated exposure to the sun. J Dermatol ses Control 1994; 5: 73-82.
Surg Oncol 1988; 14: 835-49. 186. Height and weight in relation to breast cancer morbidity and
167. Elwood JM, Jopson J. Melanoma and sun exposure: an over- mortality. A prospective study of 570,000 women in Norway.
view of published studies. Int J Cancer 1997; 73: 198-203. Int J Cancer 1989; 44: 23-30.
168. Franceschi S, Levi F, Randimbison L, et al. Site distribution 187. Ursin G, Longnecker MP, Haile RW, et al. A meta-analysis of
of different types of skin cancer: new etiological clues. Int J body mass index and risk of prememopausal breast cancer.
Cancer 1996; 67: 24-8. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 137-41.
169. English DR, Armstrong BK, Kricker A. Case- control study of 188. Hunter DJ, Willet WC. Diet, body size and breast cancer. E-
sun exposure and SCC of the skin. Int J Cancer 1998; 77: 347- pidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 110-32.
53. 189. Huang Z, Willet WC, Colditz GA, et al. Dual effects of
170. Rosso S, Zanetti R, Martinez C, et al. The multicentre south weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA 1997;
European study Helios II: different sun exposure patterns in 278: 1407-11.
the etiology of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the 190. Petridou E, Syrigou E, Toupadaki N, et al. Determinants of
skin. Br J Cancer 1996; 73: 1447-54. age at menarche as early life predictors of breast cancer risk.
171. Elwood JM, Jopson J. Melanoma and sun exposure: an over- Int J Cancer 1996; 68: 193-98.
view of published studies. Int J Cancer 1997; 73: 198-203. 191. Adami HO, Adams G, Boyle, et al. Chapter II: breast cancer
172. Parkin DM. The global burden of Cancer. Semin Cancer Biol etiology. Int J Cancer 1990; 55:22-39.
1998; 8: 219-35. 192. Bernstein L, Henderson BE, Hanisch R, et al. Physical exerci-
173. Tominaga S. Cancer incidence in Japanese in Japan, Hawaii, se and reduced risk of breast cancer on young women. J Natl
and western United States. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1985; Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 1403-8.
69: 83-92. 193. Wolff MS, Collman GW, Barrett JC, et al. Breast cancer and
174. Ziegler RG, Hoover RN, Pike MC, et al. Migration patterns enviromental risk factors: epidemiological and experimental
and breast cancer risk in Asian-American women. J Natl Can- findings. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1996; 36: 573-96.
cer Inst 1993; 85: 1819-27. 194. Davis DL, Axelrod D, Bailey L, et al. Rethinking breast can-
175. Lalen F, Hunter DJ. Enviromental risk factors and female cer risk and the environment: the case for the precautionary
breast cancer. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19: 101-23. principle. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106: 523-9.
176. Hankinson S, Hunter D. Breast Cancer. In: Adami HO, Hun- 195. Laden F, Hunter DJ. Enviromental risk factors and female
IV. 287

breast cancer. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19: 101-23. lial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 92-6.
196. wertz M, Holmberg L, Karjalainen S, et al. Incidence of ma- 215. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. J. E-
le breast cancer in Scandinavia, 1943-1982. Int J Cancer 1989; pidemiology. Cancer Causes Control 1991; 2: 325-57.
43: 27-31. 216. Kushi LH, Mink PJ, Folsom AR, et al. Prospective study of
197. Petridou E, Giokas G, Kuper H, et al. ndocrine correlates of diet and ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 21-31.
male breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Athens, Gree- 217. Mink Pd, Folsom AR, Sellers TA, et al. Physical activity,
ce. Britist Journal of Cancer 2000; 83: 1234-37. waist-to-hip ratio, and other risk factors for ovarian cancer: a
198. Beral V, Hemon C, Muoz N, et al. Cervical cancer. In: Doll follow-up study of older women. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 38-45.
R, Fraumeni JF, Muir CS, eds. Trends in Cancer Incidence 218. Gertig D, Hunter D. Ovarian Cancer. In: Adami HO, Hunter
and Mortality. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. New
Press, 1994: 265-85. York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 391.
199. zur Hausen H. Human genital cancer: synergism between two 219. Farrow DC, Weiss Ns, Lyon JL, et al. Association of obesity
virus infections or synergism between a virus infection and and ovarian cancer in a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol
initiating events? Lancet 1982; 2: 1370. 1989; 129: 1300-4.
200. Eluf-Neto J, Booth M, Muoz N, et al. Human papilomavirus 220. Muir C, Waterhouse J, Mack T, et al, eds. Cancer Incidence
and invasive cervical cancer in Brazil. Br J Cancer 1994; 69: in Five Continents, Vol V. International Agency for Research
114-19. on Cancer. Lyon: IARC Press, 1987.
201. Wilkelstein W, Jr. Smoking and cervical cancer-current sta- 221. Lumey LH, Pittman B, Zang EA, et al. Cigarette smoking and
tus: a review. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 945-57. prostate cancer: no relation with six measures of lifetime
202. Potischman N, Brinton LA. Nutrition and cervical neoplasia. smoking habits in a large case-control study among U.S. whi-
Cancer Causes Control 1996; 7: 113-26. tes. Prostate 1997; 33: 195-200.
203. Parkin DM. Epidemiology of cancer: global patterns and 222. Jensen OM, Paine SL, McMichael AJ, Ewertz M. Alcohol. In:
trends. Toxicol Lett 1998; 102-103: 227-34. Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and
204. Waterhouse J, Muir C, Correa P. Cancer Incidence in Five Prevention. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996:
Continents. IARC Sci Pub. No. 143. Lyon: International A- 290-318.
gency for Research on cancer, 1992: 120. 223. Tonnesen H, Moller H, Andersen JR, et al. Cancer morbidity
205. Grady D, Gebretsadik T, Kerlikowshe K, et al. Hormone re- in alcohol abusers. Br J Cancer 1994; 69: 327-32.
placement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analy- 224. Hiatt RA, Armstrong MA, Klatsky AL, et al. Alcohol consum-
sis. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 304-13. ption, smoking, and other risk factors, and prostate cancer in
206. Goodman MT, Wilkens LR, Hankin JH, et al. Diet, body size, a large health plan cohort in California (United States). Can-
physical activity, and the risk of endometrial cancer. Cancer cer Causes Control 1994; 5: 66-72.
Res 1997a; 57: 5077-85. 225. Kolonel LN, Nomura AMY, Cooney RV. Dietary fat and pro-
207. Swanson CA, Potischman N, Wilbanks GD, et al. Relation of tate cancer: current status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 414-
endometrial cancer risk to past, contemporary body size and 28.
body fat distribution. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1993; 226. Zhang J, Sasaki S, Amano K, et al. Fish consumption and
2: 321-7. mortality from all causes, ischemic heart disease, and stroke:
208. Mac Donald PC, Edman CD, Hansell DL, et al. Effect of obe- an ecological study. Prev Med 1999; 28: 520-9.
sity in conversion of plasma androstenedione to estrone in 227. Augustsson K, Michaud D, Rimm E, et al. A prospective stu-
postmenopausal women with and without endometrial cancer. dy of intake of fish and marine fatty acids and prostate cancer.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 30: 448-55. Submitted (2002).
209. Key TJ, Pike MC. The dose-effect relationship between un- 228. Giovannucci E. Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene,
opposed estrogens and endometrial mitotic rate: its central and cancer: review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Can-
role in explaining and predicting endometrial cancer risk. Br J cer Inst 1999; 91: 317-31.
Cancer 1988; 57: 205-12. 229. Redman C, Scott JA, Baines AT, et al. Inhibitory affect of se-
210. Sturgeon SR, Brinton LA, Berman ML, et al. Past and pre- lenomethionine on the growth of three selected human tumor
sent physical activity and endometrial cancer risk. Br J Cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett 1998; 125: 103-10.
1993; 68: 584-9. 230. Menter DG, Sabichi AL, Lippman SM. Selenium effects on
211. Moradi T, Nyrn O, Bergstrom R, et al. Risk for endometrial prostate cell growth. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;
cancer in relation to occupational physical activity: a nation- 9: 1171-82.
wide cohort study in Sweden. Int J Cancer 1998; 76: 665-70. 231. Rayman MP. The importance of selenium to human health.
212. Booth M, Beral V, Smith P. Risk factors for ovarian cancer: a Lancet 2000; 356: 233-41.
case-control study. Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 92-6. 232. O Clarke LC, Coombs GF, Turnbull BW, et al. Effects of se-
213. Lagiou P, Ye W, Wedren S, et al. Incidence of ovarian cancer lenium sumplemetation for cancer prevention in patients with
among alcoholic women: a cohort study in Sweden. Int J Can- carcinoma of the skin. A randomised trial. JAMA 1996; 276:
cer 2001; 91: 264-6. 1957-63.
214. Shu Xo, Gao YT, Yuan JM, et al. Dietary factors and epithe- 233. Meydani M. Vitamin E. Lancet 1995; 345: 170-5.
288 OY

234. Hartman TJ, Albanes D, Pietinen P, et al. The association 251. Momas J, Daures JP, Festy B, et al. Bladder cancer and black
between baseline vitamin E, selenium, and prostate cancer in tobacco cigarette smoking. Some results from a French case-
the alpha-tocopherol beta-carotene cancer prevention study. control study. Eur J Epidemiol 1994; 10: 599-604.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998; 7: 335-40. 252. Coffee consumption and bladder cancer in non-smokers: a
235. Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KDR, et al. Soy intake and pooled analysis of case-control studies in European countries.
cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr Cancer Causes and Control 2000; 11: 928-31.
Cancer 1994; 21: 113-31. 253. Michaud DS, Spiegelman D, Clinton SK, et al. Fluid intake
236. Bylund A, Zhang JX, Bergh A, et al. Rye bran and soy protein and the risk of bladder cancer in men. N Engl J Med 1999a;
delay growth and increase apoptosis of human LNCaP prosta- 340: 1390-7.
te adenocarcinoma in nude mice. Prostate 2000; 42: 304-14. 254. Zeegers MP, Volonics A, Dorant E, et al. Alcohol consump-
237. Hsing AW, Deng J, Sesterhenn IA, et al. Body size and pro- tion and bladder cancer risk: results from the Netherlands
state cancer: a poputation-based case-control study in China. Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 38-41.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000a; 9: 1335-41. 255. Boice JD Jr, Engholm G, Kleinerman RA, et al. Radiation
238. United Kingdom Testicular Cancer Study Group. Social, be- dose and second cancer risk in patients treated for cancer of
havioural and medical factors in the aetiology of testicular the cercix. Radiat Res 1988; 116: 3-55.
cancer: results from the U.K. study. Br J Cancer 1994a; 70: 256. McGeoghegan D, Binks K. The mortality and cancer morbidi-
513-20. ty experience of workers at the Capenhurst uranium enrich-
239. Sigurdson AJ, Chang S, Annegers JF, et al. A case-control ment facility 1946-95. J Radiol Prot 2000; 20: 381-401.
study of diet and testicular carcinoma. Nutr Cancer 1999; 34: 257. Kogevinas M, Kauppinen T, Boffetta P, Saracci R. Estimation
20-6. of the burden of occupational cancer in Europe. Final Report
240. La Vecchia C, Airoldi L. Human bladder cancer: epidemiolo- to the European Commission of a project funded by the pro-
gical, pathological and mechanistic aspects. In: Capen CC, gramme Europe against Cancer (Contract SOC 96-200742
Dybing E, Rice JM, Wilbourn JD, eds. Species Differences in 05F02). Barcelona, Institut Municipal d Investigaci Mdica,
Thyroid and Urinary Bladder Carcinogenesis. IARC Sci Pub. 1998a.
No. 147. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 258. Sellers C, Markowitz S. Reevaluating the carcinogenicity of
1999: 139-57. ortho-toluidine: a new conclusion and its implications. Regul
241. nternational Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco Smo- Toxicol Pharmacol 1992; 301-17.
king. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic 259. Kogevinas M, Kauppinen T, Boffetta P, Saracci R. Estimation
Risks to Humans. Vol. 38. Lyon: IARC, 1986. of the burden of occupational cancer in Europe. Final Report
242. Brennan P, Bogillot O, Cordier S, et al. Cigarette smoking to the European Commission of a project funded by the pro-
and bladder cancer in men: a pooled analysis of 11 case-con- gramme Europe against Cancer (Contract SOC 96-200742
trol studies. Int J Cancer 2000; 86: 289-94. 05F02). Barcelona, Institut Municipal d Investigaci Mdica,
243. Doll R, Peto R, Wheatley K, et al. Mortality in relation to 1998a.
smoking: 40 years observation on male British doctors. Br 260. Vineis P, Pirastu R. Aromatic amines and cancer. Cancer
Med J 1994; 309: 901-11. Causes Control 1997; 8: 346-55.
244. Chyou PH, Nomura AM, Stemmermann GN. A prospective 261. Clacel J, Mandereau L, Limasset JC, et al. Occupational ex-
study of diet, smoking, and lower urinary tract cancer. Ann posure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the risk of
Epidemiol 1993; 3: 211-6. bladder cancer: a French case-control study. Int J Epidemiol
245. Gabbani G, Nardini B, Bordin A, et al. Urinary mutagenicity 1994; 23: 1145-53.
on TA98 and YG1024 Salmonella typhimurium strains after a 262. nternational Agency for Research on Cancer. Chlorinated
hamburger meal: influence of GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes. drinking-water; chlorination by-products; some other haloge-
Mutagenesis 1998; 13: 187-91. nated compounds; cobalt and cobalt compounds. IARC Mo-
246. Steineck G, Hagman U, Gerhardsson M, et al. Vitamin A nographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemi-
supplements, fried foods, fat and urothelial cancer. A case- cals to humans. Vol. 52. Lyon: IARC, 1991.
referent study in Stockholm in 1985-87. Int J Cancer 1990; 45: 263. Koivusalo M, Hakulinen T, Vartiainen T, et al. Drinking wa-
1006-11. ter mutagenicity and urinary tract cancers: a population-based
247. La Vecchia C, Negri E. Nutrition and bladder cancer. Cancer case-control study in Finland. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 704-
Causes Control 1996; 7: 95-100. 12.
248. alaveille C, Hautefeuille A, Pignatelli B, et al. Antimutage- 264. King WD, Marrett LD. Case-control study of bladder cancer
nic dietary phenolics as antigenotoxic substances in urothe- and chlorination by-products in treated water (Ontario, Cana-
lium of smokers. Mutat Res 1998; 18: 219-24. da). Cancer Causes Control 1996; 7: 596-604.
249. La Vecchia C, Negri E. Nutrition and bladder cancer. Cancer 265. Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, Fuchs A, et al. Bladder cancer
Causes Control 1996; 7: 95-100. mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argenti-
250. Rothman N, Talaska G, Hayes RB, et al. Acidic urine pH is na. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 117-24.
associated with elevated levels of free urinary benzitine and 266. Smith AH, Goycolea M, Haque R, et al. Marked increase in
N-acetylbenzidine and urothelial cell DNA adducts in exposed bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of northern Chi-
workers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 1039-42. le due to arsenic in drinking water. Am Epidemiol 1998; 147:
IV. 289

660-9. nervous system after radiotherapy in childhood. N Engl J


267. McLaughlin JK, Lindblad P, Mellemgaard A, et al. Interna- Med 1988; 319: 1033-9.
tional renal-cell cancer study. I. Tobacco use. Int J Cancer 286. Savitz D, Trichopoulos D. Brain Cancer. In: Adami HO,
1995b; 60(2): 194-8. Hunter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiolo-
268. Yuan JM, Castelao JE, Gago-Dominguez M, et al. Tobacco gy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 494.
use in relation to renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Bio- 287. Rodvall Y, Ahlbom A, Spnnare B, et al. Glioma and occupa-
markers Prev 1998b; 7: 429-33. tional exposure in Sweden, a case-control study. Occup Envi-
269. Yuan JM, Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao JE, et al. Crucife- ron Med 1996; 53: 526-32.
rous vegetables in relation to renal cell carcinoma. Int J Can- 288. Khuder SA, Mutgi AB, Schaub EA. Meta-analysis of brain
cer 1998c; 77: 211-6. cancer and farming. Am J Ind Med 1998; 34: 252-60.
270. Dragsted LO, Strude M, Larsen JC. Cancer-protective factors 289. Thomas TL, Waxweiler RJ. Brain tumors and occupational
in fruits and vegetables: biochemical and biological background. risk factors: a review. Scand J Work Environ Health 1986; 12:
Pharmacol Toxicol 1993; 72(Suppl 1): 116-35. 1-15.
271. Nogueira E, Cardesa A, Mohr U. Experimental models of 290. Longnecker MP, Rogan WJ, Lucier G. The human health ef-
kidney tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1993; 119: 190-8. fects of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) and PCBs
272. Munro IC, Kennepohl E, Erickson RE, et al. Safety asses- (polychlorinated biphenyls) and an overview of organochlori-
ment of ingested heterocyclic amines: initial report. Regul nes and public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1997; 18: 211-
Toxicol Pharmacol 1993; 17: 51-109. 44.
273. Wilkins JR 3rd, Comstock GW. Source of drinking water at 291. Kheifets LI, Afifi AA, Buffler PA, et al. Occupational electric
home and site-specific cancer incidence in Washington Coun- and magnetic field exposure and brain cancer: a meta-analy-
sis. J Occup Environ Med 1995; 37: 1327-41.
ty, Maryland. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114: 178-90.
292. Cantor KP, Lynch CF, Hildesheim ME, et al. Drinking water
274. Koivusalo M, Hakulinen T, Vartiainen T, et al. Drinking wa-
source and chlorination byproducts in Iowa. III. Risk of brain
ter mutagenicity and urinary tract cancers: a population-based
cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 552-60.
case-control study in Finland. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 704-
12. 293. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J. Can-
cer Incidence in Five Continents. Vol. VII. No. 143. Interna-
275. Wolk A, Lindblad P, Adami HO. Nutrition and renal cell can-
tional Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon: World Health
cer. Cancer Causes Control 1996b; 7: 5-18.
Organization, 1997.
276. Yuan JM, Castelao JE, Gago-Dominguez M, et al. Hyperten-
294. Fisher CL, Mannino DM, Herman WH, et al. Cigarette
sion, obesity and their medication in relation to renal cell car-
smoking and thyroid hormone levels in males. Int J Epidemiol
cinoma. Br J Cancer 1998a; 77: 1508-13.
1997; 26: 972-7.
277. Prineas RJ, Folsom AR, Zhang ZM, et al. Nutrition and 295. Rossing MA, Cushing K, Voight L, et al. Risk of papillary thy-
other risk factors for renal cell carcinoma in postmenopausal roid cancer in women in relation to smoking and alcohol con-
women. Epidemiology 1997; 8: 31-6. sumption. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 49-54.
278. Burch JD, Craib KJP, Choi BCK, et al. An exploratory case- 296. Franceschi S, Boyle P, Maisonneuve P, et al. The epidemio-
control study of brain tumors in adults. J Natl Cancer Inst logy of thyroid carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncogen 1993; 4: 25-53.
1987; 78: 601-9.
297. Pettersson B, Adami HO, Wilander E, et al. Trends in thyroid
279. Burch JD, Craib KJP, Choi BCK, et al. An exploratory case- cancer incidence in Sweden, 1958-1981, by histopathologic ty-
control study of brain tumors in adults. J Natl Cancer Inst pe. Int J Cancer 1991; 48: 28-33.
1987; 78: 601-9. 298. Horn-Ross PL, Morris JS, Lee M, et al. Iodine and thyroid
280. Lee M, Wrensch M, Miike R. Dietary and tobacco risk factors cancer risk among women in a multiethnic population: The
for adult onset glioma in the San Francisco Bay Area. (Cali- Bay Area Thyroid Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomar-
fornia, USA). Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8: 13-24. kers Prev 2001; 10: 979-85.
281. Preston-Martin S, Mack W. Gliomas and meningiomas to n- 299. Franceschi S, Levi F, Negri E, et al. Diet and thyroid cancer: a
nitroso compounds. In: O Neil IK, et al, eds. Relevance to pooled analysis of four European case-control studies. Int J
Human Cancer of N-Nitroso Compounds, Tobacco Smoke and Cancer 1991; 48: 395-8.
Mycotoxins. IARC Sci. Pub. No. 105. Lyon: International A- 300. Ron E, Kleinerman RA, Boice JD Jr, et al. A population-
gency for Research on Cancer, 1991: 1977-1203. based case-control study of thyroid cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst
282. Boeing H, Schlehofer B, Blettner M, et al. Dietary carcino- 1987; 79: 1-12.
gens and the risk for glioma and meningioma in Germany. Int 301. Rossing MA, Cushing K, Voight L, et al. Risk of papillary thy-
J Cancer 1993; 53: 561-5. roid cancer in women in relation to smoking and alcohol con-
283. Burch JD, Craib KJP, Choi BCK, et al. An exploratory case- sumption. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 49-54.
control study of brain tumors in adults. J Natl Cancer Inst 302. Franceschi S, Levi F, Negri E, et al. Diet and thyroid cancer: a
1987; 78: 601-9. pooled analysis of four European case-control studies. Int J
284. Giles GG. What do we know about risk factors for glioma? Cancer 1991; 48: 395-8.
Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8: 3-4. 303. Goodman MT, Kolonel KM, Wilkens LR, et al. The associa-
285. Ron E, Modan B, Boice JD, et al. Tumors of the brain and tion of body size, reproductive factors and thyroid cancer. Br
290 OY

J Cancer 1992; 66: 1180-4. 318. Petridou E, Trichopoulos D, Kalapothaki V, et al. The risk
304. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of atomic profile of childhood leukemia in Greece: a nationwide case-
Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing ra- control study. Br J Cancer 1997; 76: 1241-47.
diation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, 319. American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition and
with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations, 2000. the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington,
305. nskip PD, Ekbom A, Galanti MR, et al. Medical diagnostic x DC: American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997: 1-670.
rays and thyroid cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1613-21. 320. Petridou E, Trichopoulos D. Leukemias. In: Adami HO,
306. Parkin DM, Pidani P, Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics. CA Hunter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiolo-
Cancer J Clin 1999; 49: 33-64. gy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 562.
307. Hjalgrim H, Frisch M, Begtrup K, et al. Recent increase in 321. Broomhall J, May R, Lilleyman JS, et al. Height and lympho-
the incidence of Non-Hodkins lymphoma among young men blastic leukemia. Arch Dis Child 1983; 58: 300-1.
and women in Denmark. Br J Cancer 1996; 73: 951-4. 322. Petridou E, Skalkidou A, Dessypris N, et al. Endogenous risk
308. Bernard SM, Cartwright RA, Darwin CM, et al. Hodgkins di- factors for childhood leukemia in relation to the IGF System
sease: case-control epidemiological study in Yorkshire. Br J (Greece). The Childhood Haematologists-Oncologists Group.
Cancer 1987; 55: 85-90. Cancer Causes Control 2000; 11: 765-71.
309. Zahm SH, Weisenburger DD, Holmes FF, et al. Tobacco and 323. United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic
non-Hodgkins lymphoma: combined analysis of three case- Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation.
control studies (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1997; Report to the General Assembly with annexes. United Na-
8: 159-66. tions Sales Pub. No. E. 88 IX.7. New York, 1988, 1993, 1994.
310. Adami J, Nyrn O, Bergstrm R, et al. Smoking and the risk 324. United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic
of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma (Sweden). Can- Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation.
cer Causes Control 1998; 9: 49-56. Report to the General Assembly with annexes. United Na-
311. Davis MK. Review of the evidence for an association between tions Sales Pub. No. E. 94 IX.2. New York, 1993.
infant feeding and childhood cancer. Int J Cancer 1998; 11(S): 325. Monson RR, MacMahon B. Prenatal x-ray exposure and can-
29-33. cer in children. In: Boice JD Jr, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Radia-
312. Ron E. Ionizing relation and cancer risk: evidence from epi- tion Carcinogenesis: Epidemiology and Biological significan-
demiology. Radiat Res 1998; 150: 30-41. ce. New York: Raven Press, 1984: 107-18.
313. Petridou E, Trichopoulos D. Leukemias. In: Adami HO, Hun- 326. Petridou E, Trichopoulos D, Dessypris N, et al. Infant leuke-
ter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. mia after in utero exposure to radiation from Chernobyl. Na-
New York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 559. ture 1996; 382: 352-3.
314. Petridou E, Hsieh C-C, Kotsifakis G, et al. Evolution and Di- 327. Petridou E, Trichopoulos D, Kravaritis A, et al. Electrical
stribution of Childhood Leukemia Mortality in Greece: Etio- Power Lines and Childhood Leukemia: A study from Greece.
logical Implications. Eur J Pub Health 1992; 2: 29-33. Int J Cancer 1997; 73: 345-48.
315. Severson RK. Cigarette smoking and risk of leukemia. J Clin 328. Petridou E, Hsieh C-C, Skalkidis Y, et al. Suggestion of con-
Epidemiol 1989; 42: 1025-8. comitant changes of electric power consumption and child-
316. MacLaughlin JK, Hrubec Z, Linet MS, et al. Cigarette smok- hood leukemia in Greece. Scand J Soc Med 1993; 4: 281-85.
ing and leukemia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81: 1262-3. 329. Adami HO, Day NE, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC. Primary
317. Adami J, Nyrn O, Bergstrm, et al. Smoking and the risk of and secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidi-
leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma (Sweden). Can- ty and mortality. European Journal of Cancer 37 (2001); S118-
cer Causes Control 1998; 9: 49-56. S127.
V
K

. K ............................................................................................................ 293


. .......................................................................................................... 311

.

H (transformation)
1890 David Hansemann . -

1. 1914 Theodor Boveri
- .
, (metastasis) -
-
2. -
O - . -
, .
.
-
, - (constitutional mu-
. O - tation), ( -
- ). -
- -
. -
. . -
O , ,
, 3: , .
(immortalization) , -
, - , (.
. 1):


1. -
--
-
. - -
-
- -
--

-
. -

-

.
- -
-
,
- -
.
-

293
294 OY


()

()



(, & )

()

(V)

2. , -
, , , .

- -
- (S) -
. .
- - .
, , - H
, ( GTP), - - -
.
(-
) 4 (. 2). - OOI O-OOOI

--
-
,
- .
, -
, -
O-OOOI
, -
- -
- 8.
, , - ras (N-ras, H-ras, K-ras) -
, - 9.
5. O -
-
OI O-OOOI
. ,
- (CML)
- - abl
. 9 -
- 22 10.
. -
- - ,
. DNA -
6,7 ( - ,
) -
.
V. 295

DNA11.
INT-2 c-erbB2
N-myc 4. . -
,
-, sis,
. -
PDGF (platelet derived growth factor)13.
OOOI -
, , ,
33,
, -
. , .
-
5. 1 -
O )
.
) -
. -
- : ) -- -
- .
, -
( ), ) -- erb,
, (EGF)4. c-erbB2
) erbB, -
, , -
- . 14.
YO OOOI
, -
, -
.

1. 12


Abl Abelson 9q34
Src Rous () 20q12-13
Trk 1q32
H-ras Harvey 11p15.5 GTP
N-ras () 1p13 GTP
DNA
yc 8p24 DNA
N-myc 2p24

Sis Simian 22q12.3-13.1
PDGF

ErbA 17q21-22
296 OY

, -
15. Burkitts, 3
abl - . t(2;8), t(8;22) t(8;14),
17, src - 24. -
Rous17. myc 8
-
14 . O -
O - 2 22
-
. raf - 25.
-
18.
-
. ,
fos, jun19 erbA20 - (CML), abl
- 9q34 -
22
(bcr) 22q1126.
DNA. - , -
. -
. , ras
27.
-
bcl-2 -
21. (viral oncogenes)
4.
OOOI OY

IH O

-
22: .

. OOOO OI
-
- . O
. - - DNA RNA. O -
, - RNA -
. .
-
-myc ( 2q) DNA OOOO OI
- O DNA papova .
O
DNA - . -
23. N-myc - Rb / p53.
DNA -
HSR ( ). 3 4.
- - O DNA
. O in vitro. -
(promoter) DNA - : -
5 , (permis-
, , sive cells) ,
mRNA5. - (non permissive cells)28.
V. 297

1 (adeno) SV40 -:
- (SV40) p53
E2F E7 (HPV) E2F
Rb
HPV E6:
p53
p53
Rb
,
1:
S p53

3. DNA 4. DNA
Rb. p53.

, -
, . O
. , -
, (splicing) , -
, - ( tumor, -
- ). -
, , DNA
-
. O -
SV40
28 (. 5). -

() () - ,
DNA .

-
. SV40

(15-18 h) - t- -
29.
-
-
, 1 130.

RNA OOOO OI
DNA

(24-28 h) RNA 8.500 . RNA -
tRNA . -
DNA
50 DNA
,
31 (. 6). O

-
DNA
RNA (. 7). -


tRNA ,

DNA31.
DNA -
(>48 h):
LTRs (long terminal repeats). O
: , -

.
DNA . DNA

- ,


5. - ().
papova SV40. -
298 OY

6.
.

()

5' 3'
m7GpppG
m R U5 PBS gag pol env U3 R A(A)nAOH

5' 3'
- tRNA -

7.
-
3' ,
RNA 5' R U5 PBS U3 R 3' -
DNA.

DNA
1. To RNA , R U5
3'
DNA
5' RNA 5' R U5 PBS U3 R

2. H RNase R U5
RNA PBS U3 R

3. : DNA R U5
RNA R PBS U3 R

U3 R U5
4. DNA
PBS U3 R

5. 5'
U3 R U5
RNA
5' 3'

5'
U3 R U5
6. 3'
DNA U3 R U5 PBS 5'

7. RNA tRNA U3 R U5 5'


U3 R U5 PBS 3'

3' U3 R U5 5'
8.
5' U3 R U5 PBS 3'

3' U3 R U5 5'
9.
5' U3 R U5 PBS 3'
LTR LTR
V. 299

-, - DNA

. O -
DNA : ) LTR LTR (c-abl)
DNA
) DNA -

-
, DNA LTR gag pol env LTR
- -
.
-
DNA
.
Rous,
, , -
RNA n
, -
32.
O -
mRNA n
- ( -

transducing viruses) (slow-acting RNA
viruses)33.
mRNA n
O
, RNA n
.

33. -
. n
- RNA
-- Adelson (A-MulV)

c. 8. .
O - -
- c-abl. O
(. 8). - ( ).
, -
RNA
gag, pol env - RNA . RNAs
. - ( ) DNA
-
-
Adelson (A-MulV) ( ).
, .
, , -
- - c-myc. O , -
. c-myc -
- , -
3,34. , 3,34.
( - -
) - . O
, -
. O - -
- .
, , -
:
. -

. -. (-
. ), -
300 OY

. )
-
- . O IV (human immunodeficiency virus)
- -,
. 38.
.
OO-A OI
OOOO OI O O
-
-
22. --
-
, -
.
-


,
39. -
,

gag, pol env,
,
DNA .
O Epstein-Barr, DNA
, - .
35: Burkitt -
. ,
O , DNA , - 2.
. O - - (TS)
RNA . , -
DNA - -
-- . -
36.
O papilloma, DNA
papova, - , -
, 37.
- -
, , RSV, - .
. -
AIDS ( - -

2. -

APC K K ; O

DCC K M M
NF1 N K E GTA N 1
NF2 2

P53 , Li-Fraumeni
..
RB
RET -

VHL ; ; von Hippel-Lindau
WT-1 Wilms
BRCA 1

V. 301

. O -

-. -
--
-
- , -
.

O O KNUDSON
1971 Alfred nudson

TS,

40. -
9. . -
-
(. 9). -
.

. O Knudson -
:

, -

RB1
- , -
40. . .
(
40%) -
. - -
- , . -
. (. 10).
O Knudson - , -
: , ,
) (. -
, ) 42,43.
) (.
). RB1 -
RB1 - -
- (. 6).
pRB41.

10. -
,
, WAGR
(Wilms Tumor-Aniridia-Genitourinary
Anomalies-Mental Retardation Syndro-
me)
.




302 OY

. O - 5.
Wilms .
, ,
- E E O OOY-
5. O A OO- O-
I
-
, Wilms
13 (13q14) , -
. O - , -
-
- - . O -
. () WT1,
11p1344. O
OI (LOH)
. -
-
, - 11p13 11
. - Wilms.
. -
O
-
- 10%
, . - . O
, - ,
. O
(. 11). DNA - ,
- 40 45.
. -
- p53 ( Li-Fraumeni)46, BRCA 1
- - BRCA 247. T BRCA 1 BRCA 2 -
17q2148 13q12.349 -
.
-
, ,
A 1 2
RB1 rb + . BRCA
B 1 2
1 -
-
, G1
S -
50. mRNA BRCA 1 -
1 2 1 2 1 1 1
rb rb rb rb rb rb rb
1 2 1 1 1 1 1 51. BRCA 2
- , ,
- - BRCA 1, - .


11.
DNA - : 1
- (NF1) 2 (NF2)52. O NF1

. -
, , -
.
13q. 1/4.000 53. O -
V. 303

OA OI
-

, -
E.coli. o-
, -
.
-
DNA
. -
DNA
.
-
12. .
.
() NF1 - (care takers). -
17q11 , MSH2 MLH1, -
, - , -
, , - 61. MLH1 -
, - 62,63.
Wilms54. O NF2
- O
55.
NF2 22q1256. - 64. -
NF1 , :
)
GAP, ) () .
Ras57. -
Ras, GTP
54. p53 DNA
. - -
NF1 NF2 - 58,59. (TS) .
12 -
.
( ),
, -
Li-Fraumeni
65.
, TP53, -
(- ,
, ) -
. .
. --
p53 O OO O p53
60. - p53 p53
. .
, 17p13.166. p53
Li-Fraumeni , :
p53, -
. -
( )
60. 67.
304 OY

p53 - .
-
. ,
DNA 68. , .
DNA -
, p53 - -
G1 - . -
. p53 - -
, -
bcl-2 bax69. bax - , -
, bcl-2 bax, .
69. p53 - -
bcl-2 bax70.
, . -
. O -
p53 -
, - .
. p53 ,
.
. p53 O -
- (TS), -
-- -,
,
66. . -
p53 - , -
. p53 . -
. - -
- -
p53, . -

p5371. -
.
p53 IO -
O p53 -
. - , -
-
70% . O .
p53 60% , -
.
. Li-Fraumeni ,
-
p53 - -
( . , -
)60. 50% -
30 ( ,
1% ). -
. -
OE I
OH OO
O - 9;22, Philadelphia -
. -
V. 305

(CML). - . -
, abl bcr, -
- , Wilms,
72. , Ewing,
(AML) - . -
1 7 - , -
73. - G-banded. ,
-
. 8;21 - ,
2, 15;17 3 -
16 . FISH
4. O - -
. - . , (probes) FISH
15;17 , bcr abl Phila-
AML delphia ,
3 - bcr , abl
. 77.
-
- 12;21 (ALL)78. -
. MLL (Mixed Li- FISH MLL ,
neage Leucaemia) 11q23, 11
5 - -
7 . .

, .. - OOH Y O IO
, -
73.
(ALL) - . -
- , -
- .
74. (FAP FAPC) (.
50 - 13)
. -
, - 79. -
4, 6, 10, 14, 18 21. - -
Philadelphia t(9;22)(q34;q11) -
ALL -
75. 4;11
MLL76.
12 21
ALL75.

12 21,

in situ (FISH,
Fluorescent in situ Hybridisation).
, -
-
. O - 13. O
, -
- .
306 OY

. -
- , -
, - o .
, -
79. OH A O IO
O Fearon Vogelstein80 -

- -
. (, ), (-
FAP - )
APC ( - -
) 5q2181. H .
-
,
-
,
, . -
82. APC
. O in
- , -
situ (Fluorescent in situ hybridi-

sation FISH)
APC, -
, ,
83.
-

86.
-
APC. - 2% -
. H FISH
, -
K-ras84, - Southern Blot ,
18q ( SMAD4)85 - HER2 87.
p53 Southern Blot -
G1 S 84 (. 14). ,
- / 88.
(PCR)
, , -
bcl-2/IgH. RT-PCR
APC
( )
89. -
-
12p: M -ras
-
. -
18q: DCC PCR ,
( ) N-cam 100.000
. -
-
17p: p53 90. -

real-time PCR -
PCR91.

DNA OOI (MICROARRAYS)

IO
14. .
O

- - -
- ras. RNA. -
V. 307

DNA . -
microarrays , ,
FAP, , -
. E .
O -
- DNA -
, - . , -
92. microarrays , , -
- .
, , , , -
- , - gatekeeper,
. -
,
p53, -

, .
93.
( -
microar-
)
rays , -
C ELISA,
. . -
-
I
, .

, .


1. Hansemann D von. Uber asymmetrische Zellkeilung in Spi- 12. Park M, Van de Woude GF. Oncogenes: genes associated
thelkrebser and deren biologische Bedenkung Virch. Arch 1890; with neoplastic disease. In: The metabolic basis of inherited
119: 299. disease. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989: 251-276.
2. Boveri T. Zur Frage des Entstehung Maligner Tumoren. Jena: 13. Heller S, Scheibenpflug L, Westermark B, Nister M. PDGF B
Gustav Fisher, 1-64. mRNA variants in human tumors with similarity to the v-sis
3. Bishop JM. The molecular genetics of cancer. Science 1987; oncogene: expression of cellular PDGF B protein is associated
235: 305-311. with exon 1 divergence, but not with a 3UTR splice variant.
4. http://dorakmt.tripod.com/genetics/notes06.html Int J Cancer 2000; 85(2): 211-22.
5. Thomson MW, McInnes RR, Willard HF. - 14. Meden H, Kuhn W. Overexpression of the oncogene c-erbB-2
. - (HER2/neu) in ovarian cancer: a new prognostic factor. Eur J
, 2001: 419-439. Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 71(2): 173-9.
6. Stehelin, D, Varmus HE, Bishop JM, Vogt PK. DNA related 15. Sattler M, Scheijen B, Weisberg E, Griffin JD. Mutated tyrosi-
to the transforming gene(s) of avian sarcoma viruses is present ne kinases as therapeutic targets in myeloid leukemias. Adv
in normal avian DNA. Nature 1986; 260: 170-173. Exp Med Biol 2003; 532: 121-40.
7. Bishop JM. Enemies within: the genesis of retroviral oncoge- 16. Hubbard SR. Protein tyrosine kinases: autoregulation and
nes. Cell 1981; 23: 5-6. small-molecule inhibition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12 (6):
8. Tabin CJ, et al. Mechanism of activation of a human oncoge- 735-41.
ne. Nature 1982; 300: 143-149. 17. Martin GS. The hunting of the Src. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
9. Taparowsky E, et al. Activation of the T24 bladder carcinoma 2001; 2(6): 467-75.
transforming gene is linked to a single amino acid change. Na- 18. Williams NG, Roberts TM. Signal transduction pathways in-
ture 1982; 300: 762-765. volving the Raf proto-oncogene. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1994;
10. Nowell PC, Rowley JD, Knudson AG Jr. Cancer genetics, cy- 13(1): 105-16.
togenetics - defining the enemy within. Nature Med 1998; 10: 19. Hartl M, Bader AG, Bister K. Molecular targets of the onco-
1107-1111. genic transcription factor jun. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2002;
11. Miller DM, Blume S, Borst M, Gee J, Polansky D, Ray R, Ro- 3(1): 41-55.
du B, Shrestha K, Snyder R, Thomas S, et al. Oncogenes, ma- 20. Shepel LA, Gorski J. Steroid hormone receptors and oncoge-
lignant transformation, and modern medicine. Am J Med Sci nes. Biofactors 1988; 1(1): 71-83.
1990; 300(1): 59-69. 21. Vogel MW. Cell death, Bcl-2, Bax, and the cerebellum. Cere-
308 OY

bellum 2002; 1(4): 277-87. 43. Zheng L, Lee WH. Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor and ge-
22. Friend SH, Dryja TP, Weinberg RA. Oncogenes and Tumor- nome stability. Adv Cancer Res 2002; 85: 13-50.
suppressing genes. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 618-622. 44. Call KM, Glaser T, Ito CY, et al. Isolation and characteriza-
23. Manhani R, Cristofani LM, Odone Filho V, Bendit I. Conco- tion of a zinc finger polypeptide gene at the human chromoso-
mitant p53 mutation and MYCN amplification in neuroblasto- me 11 Wilms tumor locus. Cell 1990; 60: 509-520.
ma. Med Pediatr Oncol 1997; 29(3): 206-7. 45. Claus EB, Risch NJ, Thomson WD. Age of onset as an indica-
24. Hecht JL, Aster JC. Molecular biology of Burkitts lymphoma. tor of familial risk of breast cancer. Am Epidemiol 1990; 131:
J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(21): 3707-21. 961-972.
25. Popescu NC, Zimonjic DB. Chromosome-mediated altera- 46. Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC, et al. Germline p53 mutations in
tions of the MYC gene in human cancer. J Cell Mol Med 2002; a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neo-
6(2): 151-9. plasms. Science 1990; 250: 1233-1238.
26. Clarkson B, Strife A, Wisniewski D, Lambek CL, Liu C. Chro- 47. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity
nic myelogenous leukemia as a paradigm of early cancer and and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in
possible curative strategies. Leukemia 2003; 17(7): 1211-62. breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62: 676-689.
27. Takahashi T, Munakata M, Ohtsuka Y, Nisihara H, Nasuhara 48. Albertsen H, Plaetke R, Ballard L, Fujimoto E, Connolly J,
Y, Kamachi-Satoh A, Dosaka-Akita H, Homma Y, Kawakami Lawrence E, Rodriguez P, Robertson M, Bradley P, Milner B,
Y. Expression and alteration of ras and p53 proteins in pa- Fuhrman D, Marks A, Sargent R, Cartwright P, Matsunami N,
tients with lung carcinoma accompanied by idiopathic pulmo- White R. Genetic mapping of the BRCA1 region on chromo-
nary fibrosis. Cancer 2002; 95(3): 624-33. some 17q21. Am J Hum Gen 1994; 54: 516-525.
28. , . O 49. Wooster R, Neuhausen SL, Mangion J, Quirk Y, Ford D, Col-
. , 2002: 174-208. lins N, Nguyen K, Seal S, Tran T, Averill D, Fields P, Marshall
29. Chiou WJ, Wang J, Berg CE, Wu-Wong JR. SV40 virus trans- G, Narod S, Lenoir GM, Lynch H, Feunteun J, Devilee P,
formation down-regulates endothelin receptor. Biochim Bio- Cornelisse CJ, Menko FH, Daly PA, Ormiston W, McManus
phys Acta 1999; 1450(1): 35-44. R, Pye C, Lewis CM, Cannon-Albright LA, Peto J, Ponder
BAJ, Skolnick MH, Easton DF, Goldgar DE, Stratton MR.
30. Fukuda K, Abei M, Ugai H, Seo E, Wakayama M, Murata T,
Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to
Todoroki T, Tanaka N, Hamada H, Yokoyama KK. E1A, E1B
chromosome 13q12-13. Science 1994; 265: 2088-2090.
double-restricted adenovirus for oncolytic gene therapy of gall-
50. Lou Z, Chen J. BRCA proteins and DNA damage check-
bladder cancer. Cancer Res 2003; 63(15): 4434-40.
points. Front Biosci 2003; 8: 718-21.
31. Leib-Mosch C, Brack-Werner R, Salmons B, Schmidt J, Strauss
51. Scully R, Puget N. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes.
PG, Hehlmann R, Erfle V. The significance of retroviruses in
Methods Mol Biol 2003; 222: 41-57.
oncology. Onkologie 1990; 13(6): 405-14.
52. Gabriel KR. Neurofibromatosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 1997; 9(1):
32. Lipsick JS, Wang DM. Transformation by v-Myb. Oncogene
89-93.
1999; 18(19):3047-55.
53. North K. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Med Genet 2000;
33. Ellis E (2000) Genes and Cancer
97(2): 119-27.
http://homepages.strath.ac.uk/~dfs97113/GenesCancer/GC2/
RV.html 54. Shen MH, Harper PS, Upadhyaya M. Molecular genetics of
neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). J Med Genet 1996; 33(1): 2-
34. Weinberg RA. The genetic basis of cancer. Arch Surg 1990;
17.
125: 257-260.
55. Araki N, Takeshima H, Saya H. Neurofibromatosis type 2
35. Magrath I, Jain V, Bhatia K. Epstein-Barr virus and Burkitts
(NF2). Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1997; 24(11): 1427-31.
lymphoma. Semin Cancer Biol 1992; 3(5): 285-95.
56. Ruttledge MH, Narod SA, Dumanski JP, Parry DM, Eldridge
36. Nassal M. Hepatitis B virus replication: novel roles for virus-
R, Wertelecki W, Parboosingh J, Faucher MC, Lenoir GM,
host interactions. Intervirology 1999; 42(2-3): 100-16.
Collins VP, et al. Presymptomatic diagnosis for neurofibroma-
37. McGlennen RC. Human papillomavirus oncogenesis. Clin Lab tosis 2 with chromosome 22 markers. Neurology 1993; 43(9):
Med 2000; 20(2): 383-406. 1753-60.
38. Alimonti JB, Ball TB, Fowke KR. Mechanisms of CD4+ T 57. Xu GF, OConnell P, Viskochil D, Cawthon R, Robertson M,
lymphocyte cell death in human immunodeficiency virus infe- Culver M, Dunn D, Stevens J, Gesteland R, White R, et al.
ction and AIDS. J Gen Virol 2003; 84: 1649-61. The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related
39. Balmain A. Cancer genetics: from Boveri and Mendel to mi- to GAP. Cell 1990; 62(3): 599-608.
croarrays. Nat Rev Cancer 2001; 1(1): 77-82. 58. Uhlmann EJ, Gutmann DH. Tumor suppressor gene regula-
40a.Knudson A. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retino- tion of cell growth: recent insights into neurofibromatosis 1 and
blastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1971; 68(4): 820-3. 2 gene function. Cell Biochem Biophys 2001; 34(1): 61-78.
40b. Knudson A. Alfred Knudson and his two-hit hypothesis (Inter- 59. Dupuis L, Nezarati MM. Neurofibromatosis type I as a model
view by Ezzie Hutchinson). Lancet Oncol 2001; 2(10): 642-5. of autosomal dominant inheritance. Pediatr Dermatol 2001;
41. Harbour JW. Molecular basis of low-penetrance retinoblasto- 18(5): 445-7.
ma. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119(11): 1699-704. 60. Frebourg T, Abel A, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Brugieres L, Berthet P,
42. Brantley MA Jr, Harbour JW. The molecular biology of reti- Bressac-de Paillerets B, Chevrier A, Chompret A, Cohen-Ha-
noblastoma. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2001; 9(1): 1-8. guenauer O, Delattre O, Feingold J, Feunteun J, Frappaz D,
V. 309

Fricker JP, Gesta P, Jonveaux P, Kalifa C, Lasset C, Leheup B, 80. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tu-
Limacher JM, Longy M, Nogues C, Oppenheim D, Sommelet morigenesis. Cell 1990; 61(5): 759-67.
D, Soubrier F, Stoll C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Tristant H. Li- 81a. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM, Levy DB,
Fraumeni syndrome: update, new data and guidelines for cli- Smith KJ, Preisinger AC, Hamilton SR, Hedge P, Markham
nical management. Bull Cancer 2001; 88(6): 581-7. A, et al. Identification of a gene located at chromosome 5q21
61. Jacob S, Praz F. DNA mismatch repair defects: role in colore- that is mutated in colorectal cancers. Science 1991a; 251 (4999):
ctal carcinogenesis. Biochimie 2001; 84(1): 27-47. 1366-70.
62. Wood R, Mitchell M, Sgouros J, Lindahl T. Human DNA Re- 81b. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM,
pair Genes. Science 2001; 291: 284-1289. Levy DB, Smith KJ, Preisinger AC, Hedge P, McKechnie D, et
63. Goode , Ulrich C, Potter J. Polymorphisms in DNA Repair al. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21.
Genes and Associations with Cancer Risk. Cancer Epidemio- Science 1991b; 253(5020): 661-5.
logy Biomarkers & Prevention 2002; 11: 1513-1530. 82. Fearnhead NS, Wilding JL, Bodmer WF. Genetics of colore-
64. Blaho JA. Virus infection and apoptosis: an introduction. Int ctal cancer: hereditary aspects and overview of colorectal tu-
Rev Immunol 2003; 22(5-6): 321-326. morigenesis. Br Med Bull 2002; 64: 27-43.
65. Nagata S. Apoptosis in death factor. Cell 1997; 86: 355-365. 83. Laurent-Puig P, Broud C, Soussi T. APC gene: database of
66. Chang F, Syrjanen S, Kurvinen K, Syrjanen K. The p53 tumor germline and somatic mutations in human tumors and cell li-
suppressor gene as a common cellular target in human carci- nes. Nucleic Acids Research 1998; 26(1): 269-270.
nogenesis. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88(2): 174-86. 84. Leslie A, Pratt NR, Gillespie K, Sales M, Kernohan NM,
67. Fojo T. p53 as a therapeutic target: unresolved issues on the Smith G, Wolf CR, Carey FA, Steele RJ. Mutations of APC,
road to cancer therapy targeting mutant p53. Drug Resist. Up- K-ras, and p53 are associated with specific chromosomal aber-
date 2002; 5(5): 209-16. rations in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 2003; 63
68. Lane DP. p53 guardian of the genome. Nature 1992; 358: 15- (15): 4656-61.
16. 85. Miyaki M, Kuroki T. Role of Smad4 (DPC4) inactivation in
69. Larsen CJ. The BCL2 gene, prototype of a gene family that human cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 306 (4):
controls programmed cell death (apoptosis). Ann Genet 1994; 799-804.
37(3): 121-34. 86. Kaeda J, Chase A, Goldman JM. Cytogenetic and molecular
70. Wu X, Deng Y. Bax and BH3-domain-only proteins in p53- monitoring of residual disease in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
mediated apoptosis. Front Biosci 2002; 7: 151-6. Acta Haematol 2002; 107(2): 64-75.
71. Roemer K. Mutant p53: gain-of-function oncoproteins and wild- 87. Pauletti G, Godolphin W, Press MF, Slamon DJ. Detection
type p53 inactivators. Biol Chem 1999; 380(7-8): 879-87. and quantitation of HER-2/neu gene amplification in human
72. Sattlermc M, Griffin JD. Molecular mechanisms of transfor- breast cancer archival material using fluorescence in situ hybri-
mation by the BCR-ABL oncogene. Semin Hematol 2003; 40 dization. Oncogene 1996; 13(1): 63-72.
(3): 4-10. 88. Guitart J, Camisa C, Ehrlich M, Bergfeld WF. Long-term im-
73. Hayhoe FG. Classification of acute leukaemias. Blood Rev plications of T-cell receptor gene rearrangement analysis by
1988; 2(3): 186-93. Southern blot in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J
74. Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Charrin C. Cytogenetic abnormalities in Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48(5): 775-9.
acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pathol Biol 2003; 51(6): 329-36. 89. Palmieri G, Ascierto PA, Perrone F, Satriano SM, Ottaiano A,
75. Harrison CJ, Foroni L. Cytogenetics and molecular genetics of Daponte A, Napolitano M, Caraco C, Mozzillo N, Melucci
acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Rev Clin Exp Hematol 2002; MT, Cossu A, Tanda F, Gallo C, Satriano RA, Castello G.
6(2): 91-113. Prognostic value of circulating melanoma cells detected by re-
76. Auxenfants E, Morel P, Lai JL, Sartiaux C, Detourmignies L, verse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Oncol
Bauters F, Fenaux P. Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia 2003; 21(5): 767-73. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 21(10): 2048.
with t (4;11): report on two cases and review of the literature. 90. Kunieda K, Yamaguchi K, Saji S. Significance of detection of
Ann Hematol 1992; 65(3): 143-6. micrometastases in regional lymph nodes in cancer patients
77. Campbell LJ, Martinow A, Michael PM, White JS, Rayeroux using RT-PCR. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2001; 102(6):
KC, Januszewicz EH. Correlation of cytogenetics, BCR-ABL 449-52.
PCR studies and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in 91. Van der Velden VH, Hochhaus A, Cazzaniga G, Szczepanski
adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Aust NZ J Med 1999; T, Gabert J, van Dongen JJ. Detection of minimal residual di-
29(5): 707-12. sease in hematologic malignancies by real-time quantitative
78. Zemanova Z, Michalova K, Brezinova J, Sindelarova L, Kur- PCR: principles, approaches, and laboratory aspects. Leuke-
kova S, Smisek P, Zuna J, Trka J, Stary J. Fluorescent in situ mia 2003; 17(6): 1013-34.
hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of acute childhood lym- 92. Yeatman TJ. The future of clinical cancer management: one
phatic leukemia (ALL). Cas Lek Cesk 2001; 140(17): 519-24. tumor, one chip. Am Surg 2003; 69(1): 41-4.
79. Bronzino P, Rassu PC, Cassinelli G, Stanizzi T, Casaccia M. 93. Macgregor PF, Squire JA. Application of microarrays to the
Familial adenomatous polyposis: review of the literature and analysis of gene expression in cancer. Clin Chem 2002; 48(8):
report of 3 cases. G Chir 2003; 24(1-2): 39-42. 1170-7.

.

.
20
, - . -

. 100 ,
10.
, - O
1,2. , -
1930 - 510%. O -
-
.
- -
3. 1960 - , -
, , .
, -
4. 1980 O O OO
O .
,
5,6,7. 1990 - -
. -
. , -
- . , -
. -
- -
- .
. -
- 11,12.
. -
. . O -
- DNA, -
. -
. -
(30%)8,
.
510%9. ,
O - DNA
- ,
, - .
, -
. O , - , -
, .

311
312 OY

DNA - , -
(insertions), DNA -
(point mutations), (deletions), (am- -
plifications) (translocations)13. .
O - -
. - .
-
. O -
. , -
, , - ,
, ..13.
DNA
. OOO O
100 14.
, ,
,
. , ..15,16,17. -
, DNA
- .
Mendel
. , - 50%

1.

APC O , , ,
(FAP)
MSH2 HNPCC ( , , ,
MSH6 ) , , ,
MSH3
MLH1
PMS1
PMS2
BRCA 1 O / / ?
BRCA 2 O ?, /
STK11 Peutz-Jeghers , , ,

VHL Von Hippel Lindau ,
CDKN2

RB O
NF2 , ,

NF1 , ,
, , -
, ,

Wilms WT1 Wilms
p53 Li-Fraumeni , , ,
,
RET MEN 2A, MEN 2B, ,

V. 313

. O O (GENETIC TESTING)
. -
. .. -
2 (multiple endocrine neopla-
5% 10%18,19. sia type 2 2)
O
- . O -
, .
(penetran- , -
ce), (
23.
),
O -
,
DNA, RNA, ,
15.
,

, ,
1. O
. O
-

(.. -
. O

,
), -
,
, -
,
. -
,
1 -
- 24.
. - O
, -
20. -
, .
. - -

. O - . -
..
. O RET
.. - 2, -
.
. -
. RET 8595% -
, - 25.
-
. . O
, - ( = -
21, )
22.

, - . -
. BRCA 1 BRCA
2, , -
, 26.
, -
,
- . O -
20. -
314 OY

. - 32.
, - -
. O -
. -
2 RET - -
, - -
- ,
. -
, -
, 33,34. -
. O
BRCA 1 BRCA 2 , -
, -
,
- 33.
. O , - -
, . -
2685%. O - , -
, - (pedigree), -
27,28,29.
-
, - ,
- . -
24. -
( , ,
), -
(penetrance) - .
.
, 35.
- O -
. .
100% . .
, -
, -
75%. - -
. - .
-
, - OOO O O
O
30,31. -
, - . O
DNA, ... 2002 205.000.
- 40.000
. O 33. -
( - , 510%,
), 10.250 20.500 .
. - O

. -
, ,
, -
V. 315

-
BRCA 1/BRCA 2. O - -
, BRCA 1 BRCA
, 242. , -
Li-Fraumeni ( p53),
. - 52 Cowden ( pTEN)
12,9% Peutz-Jeghers (
STK11/LKB1),
38. ,
- 74 37.
43. -
. O - , -
- CHEK,
, - -
, - , -
. - 44.
BRCA 1 BRCA 2 --
- , -
, .
- -
, ,
50 . - ,
- Newman et al 198845. Hall et al
5% - BRCA 1 -
13% 38. 17q2146.
-
. ,

, -
. O , - 47.
, , O 1994, -
BRCA 1 -
. O
. -48. -
, - -
, -
. - BRCA 1. O -
. - ,
, ,
. - 13q1217
- 1995 -
39,40. BRCA 1.
- BRCA 2 49. -
-
10% 41:
1. (< 45). , -
2. . BRCA 1 BRCA 250,
3. 2 . 51,52,53.
4. . -
5. -. . -
6. . .
316 OY

BRCA DNA.
0,1% 54, ,
42. - DNA
( , -
BRCA. ,
(1 40) ), ,
(185 . O -
delAG 538insC BRCA 1 6174delT BRCA BRCA,
2)55,56,57,58. 6 -
10% , Fan-
30 coni65. -
40% DNA -
57,58. - ,
, .. -
41. . , -
O BRCA 1 BRCA 2 - BRCA, -
. - -
BRCA 1 BRCA 2
, .
5987% BRCA 1
DNA,
3880% BRCA 2. -
66. -
. -
,

,
, 40% 50%
59,56,57. O -
. -
-
BRCA 1
4060%,
BRCA 2, -
2231%60. O -
- - , -
BRCA 2 6,3%61. O . O
BRCA BRCA
1 25% 65% (- -
BRCA 2, .
15% 25%)62,63. BRCA 1
O BRCA - -
- -
. O -
( .
) -
64. O -
35%
45% BRCA 161. O -
BRCA 2 67,68,65.
, , -
, 60, , -
61,62,63. BRCA,
. O
BRCA 1 50 49% 28% -
BRCA 2, - BRCA 1 BRCA 2 42. -
. O -
- , BRCA
V. 317

, -
50 79% -
BRCA 1 67% - BRCA, -
BRCA 2. - .
,
BRCA69. -
O - .
BRCA - -
: -
( - ,
- . -
), -
. -
76.
. O - -
BRCA 1 , , - ,
, - 72. O
BRCA 2. -
HER2/neu , 25% 30% -
BRCA 1, . O
p5370. -
O - .
BRCA , -
. 72,77.
-
- -
. - -
, - , BRCA
p5371. , -
. O -
. - : 1. -
- ( / ), 2.
, -
- 3. .

BRCA. -
, - -
, - 78,79. -
- 90% -
. - 81% -
- ,
, 80. 105 ,
72, ,
73,74. -
. - 6,4 . O
,
BRCA - 78.
, - . 70%
- -
, 75. 19%
81,82. (
318 OY

) , . 2004 56.000
-
83. , 10%
- .
- 5% - 88.
. - O
.
83. BRCA ,
- , -
- .
. - O , -
,
- . 70%
, . . 50
O - . -
- -
. 88,89.
: -
1. 10% . -
18 .
2. - , -
25 . .
3. ,
25 . Peutz-Jeghers .
4. - O
CA-125, ,
35 84. Lynch II
, -
H - 90,91.
- O -
85. 20% -
. O
- ,
. .
-
- ,
86. , . O -
-
, - 1,7 -
- BRCA. - . O
-
89,90.
, - 1990 Fearon Vogelstein92
BRCA 1. - -
, - . -
87. ,

OOO O O -. O -
O -
O - . O -
, , - , -
V. 319

- O, 80% -
. . -
- 300 APC
. O O98.
- APC (adenomatous po- APC, -
lyposis coli), -
. O , -
- . APC
, DNA -
(mismatch repair MMR). O - DNA O -
15% . 90%
. APC - -
MMR - . -
, - -
-. O , -
APC - , -.
, COX-2 K-ras, APC , - -
- , Tcf-4 (T
, DCC / DPC4 p53. cell factor-4), .
(OA)
Turcots (- G1
O ), Gard- ,
ner (O ) -
99,100,101.
, -
- APC -
- .
. - 169 1393 -
,
.
, - 102. -
.
-
, -
, 40 .
. - 1307,
- ,
93,94. 1465, 15465 2621,
- ..103,104,105.
APC (ade- -
nomatous polyposis coli). , -
O --
Herrera et al, - ( 100). O -
5q21 -
Gardner95. O -
1991 APC96. 106.
APC - . -
15 .
8.538 , - 16 107. -
2.834 97. -
APC 8085% - 100 -
320 OY

. O . , Bethesda,
-
- , -
- 4. Bethesda -
, , - 94%114.
.
, - 2. Amsterdam (1990)
. , -
108,109. 3 ,
. -
, :
( -
) -
50
O93.
O

- . - 3. Amsterdam
(1999)
1:1.000
5%
. O - (-
, ,
80% ) :

. O -
- 60%
. -
- 50

, ,

, ,
.
,
4. Bethesda
(1997)
,
. O -
:

110,111.
Amsterdam
2 -
. Amster- , -
dam 1990 -
O
-
(. 2). - / -
60%
112. / - . -
Amsterdam 1999 45
(. 3). Amsterdam, 40
-
45
, 80% 113.
1996 NCI (National Can- 45
cer Institute) -
, - 40
- -
45
. O -
V. 321

6 - ( -
DNA (mismatch repair genes MMR) - Bethesda). -
,
. - . O
- , -
hMSH2
DNA - hMLH1119.
. 90%
MMR : -
hMSH2 (human mutS homolog 2) - , -
2p16 hMSH2. 30% -
hMLH1 (human mutL homolog 1) - -
3P21 . -
hPMS1 hPMS2 (human postmeiotic segregation
1 2) 2Q31 7p22 . -
hMSH6 (human mutS homolog 6) EXO1 ..
2p16 120,121.
hMLH3, O
MLH1115. :
O -
, - Lynch I
Lyn-
, . ch II.
O - O . -
,
116.
-
. - . O
hMSH2 .. ,
, , 5
117. , -
O 118.
48 , -
DNA, - 20 .
. 10% , -
90% , -
(
, -
Amsterdam, - 6 -
15% - )91.
. Lynch II -
, -
MMR. - , -
, - 43%
- .
118. , ,
, , -
- . -
-
,
322 OY

122,123. O
O - -
DNA -
- -
. , 128. -
( 812% -
), - 129.
- -
. - ,
- ,
, 5--
124. .

: -
10 , -
(
100) -
-
100%130. O


O -

.
. 33
- ,
. .
-
. 131.
: O
, , , -
, -
, , - .
, . K
- 9q21 , -
. - 132. -
, Fallot MTS1 CDKN2.
, ..125. , p16
p14ARF. CDK2A
O -

-
p16 -
.
133. p16 ,
34 .
CDK4 CDK6, -

, -
DPC4/ -
SMAD4, - - (RB gene family proteins). -
18;21. - RB1 -
- E2F-1
PTEN, - RB1, -
. S.
, G1 S. p16 -
, CDK4.
Cowden, p16
PTEN 126,127. CDK4,
V. 323

, , /
134,135. . -
CDKN2A - . O -
, ,
. O , -
- .
, Peutz-Jeghers -
136. 142.
- O
, - . O -
- , , -
. - , , . O
, , - Peutz-Jeghers 13
, -
137. 142.
- Peutz-Jeghers
- STK11/LKB1 19p. -
. . .
5% -
, - -
- . -
138.
O CDKN2A 143,144.
,
Gardner
138,139.
, BRCA 2,
RB1 MC1R (melanocortin-1 receptor gene), - -
- . -
, , -
59,140,141. , , (
), ,
OO O .

Peutz-Jeghers
. -
E , - 713%
Peutz 1921 Gardner. O -
Jeghers 1949. Peutz-Jeghers Gardner
, - . -
, , - , , -
, , .. Gardner
, -
, . O - APC145,146,147.
39%143.
- Li-Fraumeni
Peutz- M .
Jeghers. .
p53 17p31 70%
, .
: 1. -
, 2. - Li-Fraumeni, :
Peutz-Jeghers, 3. - 1. ,
324 OY

45 . 1, -
2. - 153.
45
3. ( - 2
) ( (ultiple endocrine neoplasia MEN 2)
45 ). E ,
-
O 50% -
. 2
30 90% 70 . -
-
57%
. -
30 . O
DNA -
: ,
2
, , ,

, , -
.
.
2 3 -
,
: 2, 2
, ,

148,149,150.
(familial medullary thyroid cancer FMTC)154.
2
(ultiple endocrine neoplasia 1)
X -
E , ,

, - .
- 2 90% -
. O , 4050% 1020%
, .
1,
. , - 2 , -
. 1 -
Werner. ,
, 1, - 155.
. , , -
2
, 151.
1 X, 2, -
-
, -
Zollinger-Ellison, .
. O 2 -
O
, -
25 .
-
, -
Marfan. -
. O -
. O -
Zollinger-Ellison


2155.
. O 1 -
- O
. O 1 - E 2, -
. - -
152.
1 11q13 . -
- . - . RET
, .
V. 325

- , ,
: .
1. 10 - , RET --
. . -
2. RET . O
> 50 . RET -
3. 155. . 70% -

156,157.
- 2
. - RET - 90%, 2 85%
10. RET - 85%.
, - DNA
100% .
. RET
- -
- DNA158.


1. Cripps WH. Two cases of disseminated polyps of the rectum. Progression: Mechanistic Considerations. Advances in Cancer
Trans Path. Soc Lond 1882; 33: 165-168. Research 1993; 60: 121-156.
2. Smith T. Three cases of multiple polypi of the lower bowel oc- 15. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal
curring in one family. St Bartholomews Hosp Rep 1887; 23: cancer. Cell 1996; 87: 159-170.
225-229. 16. Miki Y, Katagiri T, Kasumi F, et al. Mutation analysis in the
3. Macklin MT. Inheritance of cancer of stomach and large inte- BRCA2 gene in primary breast cancers. Nat Genet 1996; 13:
stine in man. J Natl Cancer Inst 1960; 24: 551-571. 245-247.
4. Lynch HT, Shaw MW, Magnuson CW, et al. Hereditary fa- 17. Wooster R, Neuhausen SL, Mangion J, et al. Localization of a
ctors in cancer: study of two large Midwestern kindreds. Arch breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome
Intern Med 1966; 117: 206-212. 13q12-13. Science 1994; 265: 2088-2090.
5. Herera L, Kakati S, Gibas L, et al. Gardner syndrome in a man 18. Marra G, Boland GR. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal can-
with an interstitial deletion of 5q. Am J Med Gene 1986; 25: cer: the syndromes, the genes, and historical perspectives. J
473-476. Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1114-1125.
6. Leppert M, Dobbs M, Scambler P, et al. The gene for familial 19. Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, et al. Risks of cancer in
polyposis coli maps to the long arm of chromosome 5. Science BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.
1987; 238: 1411-1413. Lancet 1994; 343: 692-695.
20. Grogan L, Kirsch IR. Genetic testing for cancer risk assess-
7. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, et al. Identification of FAP
ment: A Review. The Oncologist 1997; 2: 208-222.
locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science 1991; 253: 661-
665. 21. Doll R, Peto R. Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years ob-
servations on male British doctors. Br Med J 1976; 2: 1525-
8. Haber DA, Housman DE. Rate-limiting steps: The genetics of
1536.
pediatric cancers [Review]. Cell 1991; 64: 5-8.
22. Loeb LA, Ernster VL, Warner KE, et al. Smoking and lung
9. Marx J. New colon cancer gene discovered. Science 1993; 260:
cancer: an overview. Cancer Res 1984; 44: 5940-5958.
751-752.
23. Hoff AO, Cote GJ, Gagel RE. Multiple endocrine neoplasias.
10. Scotto J, Fraumeni JF. Skin (other than melanoma). In: Schot- Annu Rev Physiol 2000; 62: 377-411.
tenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, eds. Cancer epidemiology and pre-
24. Holtzman NA, Watson MS, eds. Promoting safe and effective
vention. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1982: 254.
genetic testing in the United States: final report of the Task
11. Bishop JM. Molecular themes in oncogenesis. Cell 1991; 64: Force on Genetic Testing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer-
235-238. sity Press, 1999.
12. Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. The multistep nature of cancer. 25. Kebebew E, Ituarte PH, Siperstein AE, et al. Medullary thy-
Trends Genet 1993; 9: 138-141. roid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic
13. Kirsch IR. Oncogenesis. In: Oldman KT, Foglia RB, Colom- factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 2000; 88:
bani PM, eds. Surgery of infants and children: Principles and 1139-1148.
Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 549-567. 26. Brody LC, Biesecker BB. Breast cancer susceptibility genes:
14. Cheng A, Keith C, Loeb LA. Genomic Instability and Tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2. Medicine (Baltimore) 1998; 77: 208-226.
326 OY

27. Wells SA jr, Skinner MA. Prophylactic thyroidectomy, based 45. Hall JM, Lee MK, Newman B, et al. Linkage of early-onset fa-
on direct genetic testing, in patients at risk for the multiple en- milial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. Science 1990; 250:
docrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Dia- 1684-1689.
betes 1998; 106: 29-34. 46. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, et al. A strong candi-
28. Niccoli-Sire P, Murat A, Baudin E, et al. Early or prophylactic date for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility current
thyroidectomy in MEN2/FMTC gene carriers: results in 71 BRCA2 6174delT mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women affe-
thyroidectomized patients. Eur J Endocrinol 1999; 141: 468- cted by breast cancer. Nat Genet 1996; 13: 126-128.
474. 47. Offit K, Gilewski T, McGuire P, et al. Germline BRCA1
29. Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: Ge- 185delAG mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast
netic testing for cancer susceptibility, adopted on February 20, cancer. Lancet 1996; 347: 1643-1645.
1996. J Clin Oncol 1996; 141: 1730-1740. 48. Tonin P, Serova O, Lenoir G, et al. BRCA1 mutations in Ash-
30. Welch HG, Burke W. Uncertainties in genetic testing for chro- kenazi Jewish women. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 57: 189.
nic disease. JAMA 1998; 280: 1525-1527. 49. Tonin P, Weber B, Offit K, et al. Frequency of recurrent BRCA1
31. Burke W. Genetic Testing. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1867-1875. and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer
32. Biesecker BB, Boehnke M, Calzone K, et al. Genetic counsel- families. Nat Med 1996; 2: 1179-1183.
ing for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ova- 50. Wilson CA, Ramos L, Villasenor MR, et al. Localization of
rian cancer. JAMA 1993; 269: 1970-1974. human BRCA1 and its loss in high-grade, non-inherited breast
33. American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Up- carcinomas. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 236-240.
date: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 51. Bieche I, Nogues C, Lidereau R. Overexpression of BRCA2
2003; 21: 2397. gene in sporadic breast tumours. Oncogene 1999; 18: 5232-5238.
34. Matloff ET, Peshkin BN. Complexities in cancer genetic coun- 52. Chan KY, Ozcelik H, Cheung AN, et al. Epigenetic factors
seling: breast and ovarian cancer. Principles and Practice of controlling the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in sporadic ovarian
Oncology Updates 1998; 12:1-3. cancer. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 4151-4156.
35. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2002. 53. Hughes-Davis L, Huntsman D, Ruas M, et al. EMSY links the
CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 23-47. BRCA2 pathway to sporadic breast and ovarian cancer. Cell
36. Yang Q, Khoury MJ, Rodriguez C, et al. Family history score 2003; 115: 523.
as a predictor of breast cancer mortality: Prospective data 54. Ford D, Easton DF, Peto J. Estimates of the gene frequency of
from the cancer prevention study II, United States, 1982-1991. BRCA1 and its contribution to breast and ovarian incidence.
Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 652-660. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 57: 1457-1462.
37. Pharoah PD, Day NE, Duffy S, et al. Family history and the 55. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer risks in BRCA2
risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1310-1316.
Int J Cancer 1997; 71: 800-811. 56. Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
38. Collaborative Group of Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Anglian
Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual Breast Cancer Study Group. Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 1301-1310.
data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women 57. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, et al. The risk of cancer
with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2
Lancet 2001; 358: 1389-1399. among Aschkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1401-1408.
39. Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thomson WD, et al. The genetic 58. Abeliovich D, Kaduri L, Lerer I, et al. The founder mutations
attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 1996; 77: 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2
2318-2324. appear in 60 percent of ovarian cancer and 30 percent of early-
40. Newman B, Austin MA, Lee M, et al. Inheritance of human onset breast cancer patients among Ashkenazi Jewish women.
breast cancer: evidence for autosomal dominant transmission Am J Hum Genet 1997; 60: 505-514.
in high-risk families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 3044- 59. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer risks in BRCA2
3048. mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1310-1316.
41. Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, et al. Clinical characte- 60. Brose MS, Rebbeck TR, Calzone KA, et al. Cancer risk esti-
ristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and mates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evalua-
BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: tion program. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1365-1372.
1480-1490. 61. Liede A, Karlan BY, Narod SA. Cancer risks for male carriers
42. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: a review of the
and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in literature. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 735-742.
breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Consortium. Am J 62. Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop DT. Breast and ovarian cancer in-
Hum Gent 1998; 62: 676-689. cidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage
43. Martin AM, Weber BL. Genetic and hormonal risk factors in Consotrium. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56: 265-271.
breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1126-1135. 63. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of
44. Olsen JH, Hahnemann JM, Boressen-Dale AL, et al. Cancer breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2
in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia and in their relatives in mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:
Nordic countries. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 121-127. a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:
V. 327

1117-1130. and psychological and social function following bilateral pro-


64. Garber JE, Syngal S. One less thing to worry about: the shrink- phylactic mastectomy. JAMA 2000; 284: 319-324.
ing spectrum of tumors in BRCA founder mutation carriers. J 82. Borgen PI, Hill AD, Tran KN, et al. Patient targets after bila-
Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 2-3. teral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5: 603-
65. Venkitaraman AR. Cancer susceptibility and the functions of 606.
BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 2002; 108: 171-182. 83. Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, et al. Recommendations for fol-
66. Cass I, Baldwin RL, Varkey T, et al. Improved survival in wo- low-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to
men with BRCA-associated ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2003; cancer. JAMA 1997; 277: 997-1000.
97: 2187-2195. 84. Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Bartels CC, et al. Effectiveness
67. Moygnahan ME, Chiu JW, Koller BH, et al. BRCA1 controls of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation car-
homology-directed DNA repair. Mol Cell 1999; 4: 511-518. riers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:
68. Moyanahan ME, Pierce AJ, Jasin M. BRCA2 is required for 924-930.
homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol Cell 85. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance
2001; 7: 263-272. imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of
69. Warner E, Foulkes W, Goodwin P, et al. Prevalence and pene- breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 1095-1102.
trance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in unselected 86. Narod SA, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, et al. Tamoxifen and risk
Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 muta-
Inst 1999; 91: 1241-1247. tion carriers: a case-control study. Hereditary Breast Cancer
70. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Pathology of familial Clinical Study Group. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1876-1881.
breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of 87. King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, et al. Tamoxifen and breast can-
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and sporadic cases. Lancet cer incidence among women with inherited mutations in
1997; 349: 1505-1510. BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and
71. Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DE, et al. Prevalence and pe- Bowel Project (NSABPP1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.
netrance of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a po- JAMA 2001; 286: 2251-2256.
pulation series of 649 women with ovarian cancer. Am J Hum 88. Ries L, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, et al. SEER cancer statistics
Genet 2001; 68: 700-710. review 1973-1995. Bethesda, National Cancer Inst, 1998.
72. Robson M, Levin D, Federici M, et al. Breast conservation 89. Wei EK, Giovannuci E, Wu K, et al. Comparison of risk fa-
therapy for invasive breast cancer in Ashkenazi women with ctors for colon and rectal cancer. Inst J Cancer 2004; 108: 433-
BRCA gene founder mutations. J Natl Inst 1999; 91: 2112- 442.
2117. 90. Burt RW, DiSario JA, Cannon-Albright L. Genetics of colon
73. Chappuis PO, Kapusta L, Begin LR, et al. Germline BRCA1/2 cancer: Impact of inheritance on colon cancer risk. Annu Rev
mutations and r27(Kip1) protein levels independently predict Med 1995; 46: 371-379.
outcome after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 4045-4052. 91. Lynch HT, Smyrk TC, Watson P, et al. Genetics, natural histo-
74. Foukes WD, Wong N, Brunet JS, et al. Germ-line BRCA1 ry, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary non-polyposis
mutation is an adverse prognostic factor in Ashkenazi Jewish colorectal cancer: An updated review. Gastroenterology 1993;
women with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1997; 3: 2465- 104: 1535-1549.
2469. 92. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tu-
75. Boyd J, Sonoda Y, Fedrici MG, et al. Clinicopathologic featu- morigenesis. Cell 1990; 61: 759-767.
res of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer. JAMA 2000; 93. Sieber OM, Lipton L, Crabtree M, et al. Multiple colorectal a-
283: 2260-2265. denomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germline muta-
76. Haffty BG, Harrold E, Matloff E, et al. Outcome of conserva- tions in MYH. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 791-799.
tive managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. 94. Wennstrom J, Pierce ER, McKusick VA. Hereditary benign
Lancet 2002; 359: 1471-1477. and malignant lesions of the large bowel. Cancer 1974; 34:
77. Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, et al. Contralateral suppl: 850-857.
breast cancer risk is influenced by the age at onset in BRCA1- 95. Herrera L, Kakati S, Gibas L, et al. Gardner syndrome in a
associated breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 384-386. man with an interstitial deletion of 5q. Am J Med Genet 1986;
78. Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral Prophyla- 25: 473-476.
ctic Mastectomy Reduces Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and 96. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, et al. Identification of FAP lo-
BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The PROSE Study Group. J Clin cus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science 1991; 253: 661-665.
Oncol 2003; 22: 1055. 97. Groden J, Thiveris A, Samowitz W, et al. Identification and
79. Stefanek M, Hartmann L, Nelson W. Risk-reduction maste- characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli ge-
ctomy: Clinical issues and research needs. J Natl Cancer Inst ne. Cell 1991; 66: 589-600.
2001; 93: 1297-1306. 98. Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P, Leach FS, et al. Clues to the pa-
80. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilate- thogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science 1993; 260:
ral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of 812-816.
breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 77-84. 99. Shibata H, Toyama K, Shioya H, et al. Rapid colorectal ade-
81. Frost MH, Schaid DJ, Sellers TA, et al. Long term satisfaction noma formation initiated by conditional targeting of the APC
328 OY

gene. Science 1997; 278: 120-123. 117. Lynch HT, Smyrk TC. Identifying hereditary nonpolyposis co-
100. Goss KH, Groden J. Biology of the adenomatous polyposis lorectal cancer (editorial). N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1537-
coli tumor suppressor. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1967-1979. 1538.
101. Korinek V, Barker N, Morin PJ, et al. Constitutive transcri- 118. Gryfe R, Kim H, Hsieh ETK, et al. Tumor microsatellite in-
ptional activation by a beta-catenin-Tcf complex in APC+ co- stability and clinical outcome in young patients with colore-
lon carcinoma. Science 1997; 275: 1784-1787. ctal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 69-77.
102. Spirio L, Olschwang S, Groden J, et al. Alleles of the APC ge- 119. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al. A National
ne: an attenuated form of familial polyposis. Cell 1993; 75: Cancer Institute Workshop on microsatellite instability for
951-957. cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of
103. Laken SJ, Petersen GM, Gruber SB, et al. Familial colorectal international criteria for the determination of microsatellite
cancer in Askenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC. Nat instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 5248-
Genet 1997; 17: 79-83. 5257.
104. Nagase H, Miyoshi Y, Horii A, et al. Correlation between the 120. Wu Y, Berends MJ, Post JG, et al. Germline mutations of
location of germ-line mutations in the APC gene and the exo1 gene in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal
number of colorectal polyps in familial adenomatous polypo- cancer and atypical hnpcc forms. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:
sis patients. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 4055-4057. 1580.
105. Giardello FM, Petersen GM, Piantadosi S, et al. APC gene 121. Lynch HT, Coronel SM, Okimoto R, et al. Afounder muta-
mutations and extraintestinal phenotype of familial adenoma- tion of the MSH2 gene and hereditary nonpolyposis colore-
tous polyposis. Gut 1997; 40: 521-526. ctal cancer in the United States. JAMA 2004; 291: 718-724.
106. Hernegger GS, Moore HG, Guillem JG. Attenuated familial 122. Aarnio M, Mecklin J, Aaltonen LA, et al. Lifetime risk of dif-
adenomatous polyposis: an evolving and poorly understood ferent cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
entity. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 127-134. syndrome. Int J Cancer 1995; 64: 430-433.
107. Petersen G, Slack J, Nakamura Y. Screening guidelines and 123. Mecklin JP, Jarvinen HJ. Tumor spectrum in cancer family
premorbid diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis using syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). Cancer
linkage. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 1658-1661. 1991; 68: 1109-1112.
108. Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Ge- 124. Carethers JM, Smith EJ, Behling CA, et al. Use of 5-fluorou-
netic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: racil and survival in patients with microsatellite-unstable colo-
1730-1736. rectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 394-401.
109. NCCN colorectal cancer screening practice guidelines. Natio- 125. Howe JR, Roth S, Ringold JC, et al. Mutations in the
nal Comprehensive Cancer Network. Oncology 1999; 13: 152- SMAD4/DPC4 gene in juvenile polyposis. Science 1998; 280:
157. 1086-1088.
110. Ahlquist DA. Aggressive polyps in hereditary nonpolyposis 126. Olschwang S, Serova-Sinilnikova OM, Lenoir GM, et al. PTEN
colorectal cancer: targets for screening. Gastroenterology 1995; germ-line mutations in juvenile polyposis coli. Nat Genet
108: 1590-1592. 1998; 18: 12-14.
111. Rijken FE, Hollema H, Kleibeuker JH. Proximal adenomas 127. Olschwang S, Serova-Sinilnikova OM, Lenoir GM, et al. PTEN
in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer are prone to ra- germ-line mutations in juvenile polyposis coli. Nat Genet
pid malignant transformation. Gut 2002; 50: 382-386. 1998; 18: 12-14.
112. Syngal S, Fox EA, Eng C, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of 128. Haluska FG, Hodi FS. Molecular genetics of familial cuta-
clinical criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer neous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 670-682.
associated mutations in MSH2 and MSH1. J Med Genet 129. Rivers JK. Melanoma. Lancet 1996; 347: 803-806.
2000; 37: 641-645. 130. Lynch HT, Frichot BC, Lynch JF. Familial atypical multiple
113. Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP. New clinical criteria for he- mole-melanoma syndrome. J Med Genet 1978; 15: 352-356.
reditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. (HNPCC, Lynch syn- 131. Goldstein AM, Fraser MC, Clark WH, et al. Age at diagnosis
drome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on and transmission of invasive melanoma in 23 families with cu-
HNPCC. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 1453-1456. taneous malignant melanoma/dysplastic nevi. J Natl Cancer
114. Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Boland CR, Hamilton SR, et al. A Na- Inst 1994; 86: 1385-1390.
tional Cancer Institute workshop on hereditary nonpolyposis 132. Fountain JW, Karayiorgou M, Ernstoff MS, et al. Homozy-
colorectal cancer syndrome: Meeting highlights and Bethesda gous deletions within human chromosome band 9q21 in mela-
guidelines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1758-1768. noma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 10557-10561.
115. De Jong AE, Morreau H, Van Puijenbroek M, et al. The role 133. Piepkorn M. Melanoma genetics: An update with focus on
of mismatch repair gene defects in the development of adeno- the CDKN2A(P16)/ARF tumor suppressors. J Am Acad Der-
mas in patients with HNPCC. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 42- matol 2000; 42: 705-722.
48. 134. Sviderskaya EV, Hill SP, Evans-Whioo TJ, et al. r16(Ink4a) in
116. Prolla TA, Baker SM, Harris AC, et al. Tumor susceptibility Melanocyte Senescence and Differentiation. J Natl Cancer
and spontaneous mutation in mice deficient in Mlh1, Pms1 Inst 2002; 94: 446-454.
and Pms2 DNA mismatch repair. Nat Genet 1998; 18: 276- 135. Sviderskaya EV, Gray-Schopfer VC, Hill SP, et al. r16/Cyclin-
279. Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 2A deficiency in Human Mela-
V. 329

nocyte Senescence, Apoptosis and Immortalization: Possible 1962; 14: 376-390.


Implications for Melanoma Progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 147. Dobbie Z, Spycher M, Mary JL, et al. Correlation between
2003; 95: 723-732. the development of extracolonic manifestations in FAP pa-
136. Bishop DT, Demenais F, Goldstein AM, et al. Geographical tients and mutations beyond codon 1403 in the APC gene. J
Variation in the Penetrance of CDKN2A Mutations for Mela- Med Genet 996; 33: 274-280.
noma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 894-903. 148. Li FP, Fraumeni JF. Familial breast cancer, soft-tissue sarco-
137. Tsao H, Zhang X, Kwitkiwski K, et al. Low prevalence of germ- mas, and other neoplasms. Ann Int Med 1975; 83: 833-834.
line CDKN2A and CDK4 mutations in patients with early-on- 149. Macklin D, Li FP, Stron LC, et al. Germ line r53 mutations in
set melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 1118-1122. a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other
138. Blakwood MA, Holmes SR, Synnestvedt M, et al. Multiple neoplasms. Science 1990; 250: 1233-1238.
primary melanoma revisited. Cancer 2002; 94: 2248-2255. 150. Hisada M, Garber JE, Fung CY, et al. Multiple primary can-
139. Goldstein AM, Fraser MC, Struewing JP, et al. Increased risk cers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Natl Cancer
of pancreatic cancer in melanoma-prone kindreds with r161nk4 Inst 1998; 90: 606-611.
mutations. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 970-974. 151. Werner P. Genetic aspects of adenomatosis of endocrine
140. Eng C, Li FP, Abramson DH, et al. Mortality from second tu- glands. Am J Med 1954; 16: 363-367.
mors among long-term survivors of retinoblastoma. J Natl 152. Skogseid B, Eriksson B, Lundqvist G, et al. Multiple endocri-
Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1121-1128. ne neoplasia type I: a 10-year prospective screening. J Clin
141. Kennedy C, ter Huurne J, Sikkink S, et al. Melanocortin 1 re- Endocrinol Metab 1991; 73: 281-287.
ceptor (MC1R) gene variants are associated with an increased 153. Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P, et al. Positio-
risk for cutaneous melanoma which is largely independent of nal cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type
skin type and hair color. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 117: 294- I. Science 1997; 276: 404-407.
300. 154. Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, et al. Guidelines for diagno-
142. Tomlinson JP, Houlston RS. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. J Med sis and therapy of MEN type 1 and 2. J Clin Endocrinol Me-
Genet 1997; 34: 1007-1011. tab 2001; 86: 5658-5671.
143. Hemminki A, Markie D, Tomlinson I, et al. A serine/threoni- 155. Mulligan LM, Ponder BA. Genetic basis of endocrine disease:
ne kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. J Clin Endocrinolo Me-
1998; 391: 184-87. tab 1995; 80: 1989-1995.
144. Gruber SB, Entius MM, Petersen GM, et al. Pathogenesis of 156. Eng C. RET proto-oncogene in the development of human
adenocarcinoma in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Cancer Res 1998; cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 380-393.
58: 5267-5270. 157. Mulligan LM, March DJ, Robinson BG, et al. Genotype-phe-
145. Gardner EJ, Richards RC. Multiple cutaneous and subcuta- notype correlation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: re-
neous lesions occurring simultaneously with hereditary poly- port of the International RET Mutation Consortium. J Intern
posis and osteomatosis. Am J Hum Genet 1953; 5: 139-147. Med 1995; 238: 343-346.
146. Gardner EJ. Follow-up study of a family group exhibiting do- 158. Ponder BA, Ponder MA, Coffey R, et al. Risk estimation and
minant inheritance for a syndrome including intestinal polyps, screening in families of patients with medullary thyroid carci-
osteomas, fibromas and epidermoid cysts. Am J Hum Genet noma. Lancet 1999; 1: 397-401.
V

E
. , E. .................................................................................. 333


. .................................................................................................................... 341


. .................................................................................................................. 357


. ...................................................................................................... 371

(...)
. , . , . , . .................. 393

PSA
. .............................................................................................................. 405


. ...................................................................................................... 419


. , .

O , ,
O , .
, -
- -
1. 20002020 - , -
50% . -
- , -

1/3 ,
2. -
10.000.000 3. -
1 8 - .
,
. -
,
, -
- .
- -
.

(), . -
-
( / ), , -
-
. . -
- ,
: , , , -
- .
(.. , - -
) ,
(.. , - , -
) , - -
- .
, -
. -
- -
, -
4,5. -
-
.
- -

333
334 OY

, ,
/ , -
. , - , ,
-
, - . -
, - -

. - ,
- ( )
, -
-
, - 7.
, - 1 -
, - , -
. - , -
- -
- . -
. , -
, , -
. (.. -),
- -
- -
.
. 2 -
-
. H - ,
- 2000,
, - 20002020,
. .
-
: ,
-
6. 13%, -
, - 6% (2000, -
, - ). O , 20

1. -

(%)

/ 33
/ / / 31
>3
5
/ / <9
/ 6
/ 5
5

: Adami O, Day NE, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC. Primary and secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality.
European Journal of Cancer 2001; 37: S118-S127 ()
VI. 335

2. 2000, -
2020

, 2000 , 2020 , 2020

25 100 60
15 100 30
/ 10 30 1020
/ 0 0 0
/ 10 20 10
0 15 5
/ 5 30 15
0 0 0
5 20 10
30 60 45
20 50 30
5 15 10
0 15 5

,
30% - . -
4% - -
8. ,

E A (.. -
(.. - , ).
) , - -
- , -
, - .

. -

, . -

-

-
.
.
, -

,
, ,
.
- .
-
, - , -
( ) ,
. - 5.
- -
, -
, , -
. - . , -
-
. , -
- -
, - , -
.
. 45%
336 OY

, .
, 30% ,
, - -
3. . , ..
O -
,
, -
- (.. C),
. : . -
-
,
. - , -
, - -
- .
-. .
- -
.
(- .
) () -
, -
. .
- O
- .
. .. - -
- ,
, .
-
, -
. .

O EO

, - / -
, -
. . O -
,
.
. -

. -
, . O -
,
. , , -
,
, .
. O
,
, , -
9. O
. ,
, 50 ,
VI. 337

, - 12 -
- 4049 .
- -
60 10,11. ,
- . -
5074 -
(Pap test)11,12. 12 9,14.
O -
70% 50 ... -
- 17. O
9,13.
... -
Pap test , -
- ,

3 , - 21,22. -
65 9,14. O
-
30 -
20 .
- 5080 , 12
60 . , . H -
50
30 60 . - ,
35 23. -
3 5 15.
O - ,
. -

16. O
, , -
, 50 74 ,
12 15. O -
17. -
- -

18-20. O - .
O
50 69 , - ...
2 3 17. O
15. O -
40-49 (PSA).
, -
- .
, PSA
-
. ,
- 10 -
... 24-27. -
-
, 40 , - -
338 OY

28. 17.
..., 37%, -
. ...
50 11. - 1990
, -
(80% >65 31. -
), -
, -
() ,
.
-

29,30.
( ) -


15. - .
3 4
-
. ,
O -
, 75%
- .

3. O ...

/ 3 65

40 12 69
A 50 12
+
50 A 80
,
35
PSA ( 50
)

[ O , 2002]

4. O

20 35 60
50 23 69
A 50 12 74
+
O
PSA

, 1999
VI. 339

AI H IO BOCAN, EUCAN, WHOSIS, Harvard Center for Cancer


(Disease Registers) Prevention, Center for Diseases Control)32-36.
-
-
. - -
,
, -
, -
-
,
-
,
, -
-

.

-
.

, - -
-
-
(population or community register), 17.
-
,
- .
.
O , : 1.
2003 500.000 - , ,
, 2. ,
1.500 . -
4 ... - , 3.
. - , -
- , , -
, , -
(GLO- .

1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD, eds. The Global Burden of Disease. cology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997, 231-257.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996a. 7. Lagiou P, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D. Nutritional epide-
2. WHO, World Cancer Report, Geneva, 2003. miology of cancer: accomplisments and prospects. Proceedings
3. Vainio H. Social Responsibility in Cancer Prevention Reseach: of the Nutrition Society 2002; 61: 217-222.
IARC as a Global Science Force. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 8. Adami O, Day NE, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC. Primary and
2002; 3: 267-72. secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidity and
4. . : , , . mortality. European Journal of Cancer 2001; S118-S127.
: . . . , 1982: 332-336. 9. Cancer and Figures 2002, American Cancer Society, 2002.
5. T , , . - http://www.cancer.org/downloads/SST/CancerFacts&Figures
& . - 2002TM.pdf (accessed on August, 2003).
. 2 . : , 10. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer
2000: 44-46. Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Cervical Neopla-
6. Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention. Harvard report on sia and Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 342-362.
cancer prevention, volume 2: prevention of human cancer. 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Prevention of tobacco use. Cancer Causes and Control 1997, 8 http://www.cdc.gov/health/cancer.htm
(Suppl. 1), S5-S12. Trichopoulos D, Petridou E, Lipworth L et (accessed on February 3, 2003).
al. Epidemiology of Cancer. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Ro- 12. Coste J, Cochand-Priollet B, de Cremoux P, Le Gales C, Car-
senberg SA, et al, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of On- tier I, Molinie V, Labbe S, Vacher-Lavenu MC, Vielh P.
340 OY

French Society of Clinical Cytology Study Group. Cross sectio- (accessed on September 15, 2003).
nal study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, 24. Galic J, Karner I, Cenan L, Tucak A, Vranjes Z, Bilandzija-
and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer Peranovic M, Hegedus I. Role of screening in detection of cli-
screening. BMJ 2003 Apr 5; 326(7392): 733. nically localized prostate cancer. Coll Antropol 2003; 27 Suppl
13. WHO and EUROGIN Press Release, 2000. 1: 49-54.
http://www.digene.com/corporate01/press_release/PR04_10_ 25. Mistry K, Cable G. Meta-analysis of prostate-specific antigen
2000.htm (accessed on February 3, 2003). and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate
14. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, 1996. carcinoma. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003 Mar-Apr; 16(2): 95-
http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/cps3dix.htm#cancer 101.
(accessed on February 3, 2003). 26. Gerber GS, Thisted RA, Scardino PT, Frohmuller HG, Schro-
15. eder FH, Paulson DF, Middleton AW Jr, Rukstalis DB, Smith
. JA Jr, Schellhammer PF, Ohori M, Chodak GW. Results of
http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/index_en.html radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate
(accessed on February 3, 2003) cancer. JAMA 1996 Aug 28; 276(8): 615-9.
16. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society. 27. Krongrad A, Lai H, Lai S. Survival after radical prostatectomy.
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of JAMA 1997 Jul 2; 278(1): 44-6.
cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 27-43.
28. Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, Salo JO, Folmerz P,
17. Hackshaw A. EUSOMA review of mammography screening. Haggman M, Andersson SO, Spangberg A, Busch C, Nordling
Ann Oncol 2003 Aug; 14(8): 1193-5. S, Palmgren J, Adami HO, Johansson JE, Norlen BJ. Scandi-
18. Hackshaw AK, Paul EA. Breast self-examination and death navian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4. A randomiz-
from breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2003 Apr 7; ed trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting
88(7): 1047-53. in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 Sep 12; 347(11):
19. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer 781-9.
screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive 29. Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. A prospective evalu-
Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3; 137(5 Part ation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of pro-
1): 347-60.
static cancer. JAMA 1995 Jan 25; 273(4): 289-94.
20. Oestreicher N, White E, Lehman CD, Mandelson MT, Porter
30. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/prostate/prostate.htm
PL, Taplin SH. Predictors of sensitivity of clinical breast exa-
(accessed on September 17, 2003).
mination (CBE). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002 Nov; 76(1):
31. Adami HO, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer
73-81.
Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
21. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN.
Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk. 32. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/cancer/
Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services (accessed on September 18, 2003).
Task Force. Originally in Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 33. http://www3.who.int/whosis/menu.cfm
137: 132-41. (accessed on September 18, 2003).
22. Mulcahy HE, Farthing MJ, ODonoghue DP. Screening for 34. http://www-dep.iarc.fr/eucan/eucan.htm
asymptomatic colorectal cancer. BMJ 1997; 314: 285-91. (accessed on September 18, 2003).
23. American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guide- 35. http://www-dep.iarc.fr/globocan/globocan.html
lines. (accessed on September 18, 2003).
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_3X_Can 36. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/index.htm
_colon_and_rectum_cancer_be_found_early.asp?sitearea=CR (accessed on September 18, 2003).

.

E ,
- -
- . -

1. - -
- , , -
, , , , , -
. -
3.
-
, -

(promotion) (pro-
,
gression). 13-

cis-retinoic acid (13-cRA) (. 1), all-trans-retinoic
.
acid (ATRA), 9-cis-retinoic acid (9-cRA) .. -
-
in vitro -
1020 . ,
.
- -
. - RARs RxRs
(Field carcinogenesis)

, CH2OH

.
, - ( A)

(, , ),
, , , , -
.. COOH
(- 13-cis- ()
, ) ( ,
O
) .
CNH OH
- -
(.. ), -
4-HPR ()
-
. O
- COOH2CH3

2025% -
CH3O
2. -
.

O
-
-
1. .

341
342 OY

ATRA /13-cRA ATRA /13-cRA

2.


RAR- mRNA RAR-
.

RAR-

, - . 6 ,
- , - , -
4. , 4497%8,9. -
-
, -
. RAR- - -
, RAR- , .
RAR- . O -
RAR- -,
. - (placebo)
12 ,
14,8%, 27,5% 3%10 .
- - vs Retinyl Palmate placebo -
, 5 (. 2). - 33%, 52% 10% -
(preformed vit A) - 11.
, Usbekistan
. , - 6 -
-
OO ON O [dds ratio ( ) = 0,62, 95%, CI
-O = 0,390,98].
- - 13-cRA 2 mg/kgr 67%
) - ( ) 10% -
- placebo -
) . -
: )
. ) 13-cRA
, 50%
OOY O 3
O 13-cRA13.
- 13-cRA
3040% vs placebo, 13-cRA 3
, 5% - (1,5 mg/kgr*/)
. - 0,5/kgr*/ 13-cRA - (30 mg / kgr/
- ) 9 . 55% (95%,
3040% - CI = 4267%) -
6. .
8% 13-cRA -
, 55% -. -
13-cRA
7. 14.
- (4-HPR)
, ,
VI. 343

Laser, OO ON O
52 TOY O
( 3 ). - OOY O
6% - OI
4-HPR 30% -
TYLER (Texas) 755 -
15,16.
-
OOY O IO H- (50 mg / ) (25.000 IV / -
HO ) placebo. O
, .
-, 58 -
25% 2 -
. Hong 103 19. -
- -V 20 mg/kgr/
(0) 50100 mg/m2 13-cRA 12 (mi-
placebo. 32 cronuclei counts),
, - , 20.
(, , - ,
) 17. 8-x-7, 8-
13-cRA 2 (4%) - dihydro-2-deoxyguanosine,
12 (24%) placebo.
70% - .
-, . O - -
-
, , . , etretinate 25 mg / -
30% 13-cRA, 6 , -
18% 12 .
. - , -
55 , - 25 mg
1 etretinate placebo 6
. -
- .
etretinate placebo 316 - (etretinate) placebo21.
(1,2, 0) (1,2, 1) ... 93 -
. etre- -
tinate 50 mg / 1 - 13-cRA placebo
25 mg / 2 . 6 . -
41 - 2 . -
,
18. , -
etretinate - 2 .
, 2 (4-HRP)23 -
- placebo
. .. 13-cRA --
, -
etretinate. O .

(, OOY ON IO O Y-
), ( , OA
) 29.139 5068 ,
, , . 1
344 OY

36 , -- .
2 2, - , ,
(20 mg / ), a-tocopherol 50 mg / , -
placebo 58 - 28.
. O - - 307 -
-tocopherol -
18% retinyl palmitate
(RR: 1,18, 95%, CI = 1,031,36) 8% - (300.000 IU) .
(RR: 1,8, 95%, CI = 1,011,16). - 46 5
64% -
24. - 45% (p = 0,054)
, 62% 54% (p = 0,44). -
29
32% 41% -
a-tocopherol24. . ,
- 80%
- 1 29. M -
-, - 2 .
(Euroscan)
- (30 mg / ) (25.000 2 2, 2.592
IU / ) placebo. (Carotene x, T1-2,3, N0 1 --
and Retinol efficacy trial) , 1,2, 0 1, 3-0
retinyl
, - palmitate, N-acetylcysteine, placebo
28% (RR: 2 . -
1,28, 95%, CI = 1,041,57) - , -
(RR: 1,17, 95%, CI = 1,031,33) -
. - 30.
NCI (National Cancer Institute)
. - isotretinoin -
. -
O -
- 0,90 (95%, CI = 0,5 31.
1,4), 0,78 (95%, CI= 0,34 O
1,78)25. ,
, (.. -
( 2,1 - -
), Womens Health Study26. ).

-, -
XOO TON O
, - TOY O
-
- - H
- -
, - . -
27. - , -
-, ( -
- ), , -
450, - -
.
- -
VI. 345

, [< 49
, (44%), 5059 (51%) 60 (55%)]. O -
.
- (Lobular non-invasive
- Carcinoma, LCIS) 56%,
. .. 86% -
- Gail.
, ) -
(p < 0,002).
. - ) ,
, - -
- 69%,
. -
- .
. ) 20% -
, -
OE
(Colles). -
:
(Selective Estrogen Receptor ) -
Modulator, SERM), - .
) O 50
, - -
(adjuvant) . - ,
.
,
- -
. , -
NSABP-P1 -
. -
. , -
(1) Na- ,
tional Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project -
(NSABP). , 1992, - 2 . -
13.388 20 , -
mg / placebo 5 . .
-
60 (
0,8%), ,
3559 - ,
(1,66% 5 ) -
Gail ( 1 - . -
, , - O
, ... (Food and Drug Administration
)32. FDA) -
69 - -
: Gail.
) M 49% -
(p < 0,00001) 12/1.000 NSABP-P1 -
- . , , -
43,4/1.000 O 1992
placebo. 1997 5.408 3570 , -
346 OY

, -
placebo33. - -
46 2 35.

(19 22 place-
bo). - -
1 , . NSABP-P1 -

(11 vs 19, p = 0,16)33. ,
,
- ,
(1 - -
362 - .
, 8
390 placebo, -
RR: 0,13, 95%, CI = 0,021,02). -
, , - .
(38 vs 18, p = 0,0053), - . O -
, (15 vs 2, p = (1520%)
0,0013). -
- . -
(LDL), (HDL) -
, - (1520%),
, - ,
. ,
LDL 2/3 - , . -
, . -
- , -
- , ,
, - . O-
- (, -
, - , )
. O - , -
, , -
, . -
( , -
, - , -
). ,
, , Royal .
Marsden 2.494 30 70 O -
- ) (..
, 1986 - 10 mg ),
1996 20 mg / , -
placebo 8 35. - Insulin-Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)
70 10 mg ) -
- SERMs.
placebo ( 34, placebo 36, RR: 1,1,
95%, CI=0,71,7, p = 0,8). - OE
SERM
, - -
, .
VI. 347

- M -
, - 1987
. , 2.972
LDL - DCIS
, 200 mg / -
. 5 ,
, - . O
36.
, .
. , 8
-
, - 2 . -

placebo (1,7 1.000 / - -
3,7 - (27 42
1.000 / RR = 0,66, 95%, CI = 0,411,07),
placebo, RR: 0,46, CI = 0,280,75), -
54% . , (RR = 1,32, 95%, CI = 0,822,15).
35%
37. , -
39. -
- -
, , , -
IGF-140.
(NSABP-P2).
O I OE
I
(-4-HYDROXYPHENYL-RETINAMIDE 4-HPR) -
all- , in vitro in vivo -
trans , - -
. -
. 20 mg /
- .
. -
. -
-
, - 41,42,43,44.

. O - OI A ()
- O (
- ) -
.
, in vitro, . O
IGF-1. -
in vitro in -
vivo , , , - , , -
, . ( , ,
, , , ). O
-
, -
all-trans 38. . - -
348 OY

, O
O (dietery fibers) -
-

. . , ,
(ATAC), - , , 51.
- -
. O
45. ,
- . -
. , , ,
- ,
- 52. O
. -
- 53. 1970 Burkitt

. , ,
, -
OO TON O , -
TOY O O .
OI AO ,
,

. O -
-
, -
. O , -
- -
-
. 54.
. - , , -
(, ) - , , -
. 55-60.
, - , -
, -
, .. , -

46. - -
- (SCFAs), ,
- -
. - , -
61.
. - -
, - 13 -
- .
, -
- , p21
47-49. -
(Nurses Health Study) - c-fos, c-jun, -
- 62-63.

50.
VI. 349

a-difluro-methyl-ornithine (DFMO)
, DFMO
, - (ODC),
, -
. . ODC -
- ,
- .
- , - -
, - ,
61-63. .
Polyp Prevention Trial ODC, DFMO, -
35 - 68.
3 . O 45 DFMO
ODC -
(< 20% ) .
(18 g fiber / 1.000 calories),
(58 ) - 3 12 DFMO.
. -
Womens Health Clinical Trial 64.500 - DFMO69,70.
-
O OO O O-
, - (NSAIDs) OOY O
, , 3 : ) IO EO EO
(<20% ), -
7 4050% -
5 / 16 g
- -
, -

, )
NSAIDs,
, ) (1.000 mg / ), -
-
D3 (400 IU / placebo)
71.
64.
NSAIDs -
Arizona Phase III Study ,
(13,5 gr vs 2,0 gr . O , -
) 945 azothy-
, methane, , APC,
- -
65,66. - 72. NSAIDs
, , ,
O
, ,
, 3080%
. . NSAIDs -
- (
, , - ),
. 73.
930 , - NSAIDs , -
, - ( ),
vs ( -
placebo. O - ).
1 -
. 1 127 73.
(31%) 159 (38%) - 14/15 -
(RR: 0,81, 95%, CI = 0,670,99)67. -
350 OY

, 80% 78.
, O COX-2 -
, , . COX-2
. - (promotor)
- COX-2
, (disrup-
, tion) APC 79.
, - 5 -
. - COX FAP -
- .
10 . 12 6
150 Familial . -
Polyp Adenosis (FAP) - 3 (PGD2,
- PG2 6-keto PGF-1a) -
. - .
NSAIDs ( )74. , -
3 FAP 6-7 mm 80.
- -
- COX-2
. : -
) NSAIDs ,
) , (promotion) . -
) - COX-2 -
NSAIDs (..., -
, ). . O
OE O-OA 2 (COX-2)
COX-2 -
,
O - 1 2 (COX-1 COX-2) - NSAIDs. ,
-
-
(PG) 2
, -
, -
-
75. COX-1
.

- OO TON O
- TOY O
76. COX-2, -
OE IO O OA
, -
, , -
. .
COX-2 - ( ) -
,
. 81. -
COX-2 -
- 77.
- ,
- 40% - () 82. O
, - -
COX-277. -
APC - , 83. -
, APC -
COX-2 (knoking out cox-2 APC mice)
VI. 351

. 510% .
. 4. GSTP-1.
, .
2 3 1 DHT
, - -
. 5-, -
-
- DHT97. -
, - (Prostate Can-
cer Prevention Trial PCPT) placebo 18.882 -
55 84. > 55 -
1 (1q 2425, 1q 4243, 1q 36) PSA 3 ng/mc.
10 (q 2743).
K-RAS85,86, C- ,
myc87, 80% ,
, 6 2
. -- . -
cl-288,89, p5390,91 90% 25% -
RB - -
92,93.
.
(GSTP-1),
-
, - ) . -
-
(40%) -
94,95,96. 99. -
5-- -
- 5-- -
, (DHT), - 100. -
-
. - DHT - (
DNA )
, .
, . 13%,
-
- < 13 gr / 100.
. ) . stress -

H OOY TON IO .
O OAH (
), ( 450, -
, O -)
- . -
. (proliferate inflammatory atrophy PIA)
- PIN101.
4 : O (102, 103,
1. DHT. 104) -
2. () . -
. -
3. - -
352 OY

, , . O -
2-amino-1- -
methyl-6-phenylimidazol (4,5-) pyridine (PhIP). PhIP . -
- 104, (-
DNA , , , ),
, . Ol-
- tipraz105, , -
-
. aflatoxin-B.

GSTP-1 A OOE
, GSTP-1, -
-, -
. -
GSTP-1 . -
(caretaker), DNA -
.
. GSTP- -
1 - .
- -
DNA. , -
GSTP-1 () - -
() . - -
.
GSTP-1

1. Lippman SM, Benner SE, Hong WK. Cancer chemopreven- 1985; 36: 321.
tion. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 851. 10. Stick HF, Rosin MP, Homby P, et al. Remission of oral leuko-
2. Lippman SM, Spitz MR, Huberb M, Hong WK. Strategies for plakias and micronuclei in tobacco/betel quid chewers treated
chemoprevention study of premalignant lesions and second with beta-carotene plus vitamin A. Int J Cancer 1988; 42: 195.
primary tumors in the head and neck. Curr Opin Oncol 1995; 11. Sankaranararayanan R, Mathew B, Varghese C, et al. Chemo-
7: 234. prevention of oral leukoplakia with vitamin A beta-carotene:
3. Wolbach SB, Howe PR. Tissue changes following deprivation an assessment. Oral Oncol 1997; 33: 231.
of fat soluble A vitamin. J Exp Med 1925; 42: 753. 12. Zaridze D, Evstifeeva T, Boyle P. Chemoprevention of oral
4. Mangelsdor DJ, Umesomo K, Evans RM. The retinoid recep- leukoplakia and chronic esophagitis in an area of high inciden-
tors. In: Spom MB, Roberts AB, Goodman DS, eds. The reti- ce of oral and esophageal cancer. Ann Epidemiol 1993; 3: 225.
noids. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1994: 319. 13. Hong W, Endicott J, Itri LM, et al. 13-cis retinoic acid in the
5. Chambon P. The retinoid signaling pathway: modecular and treatment of oral leukoplakia. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1501.
genetic analyses. Semin Cell Biol 1994; 115. 14. Lippman SM, Batsakis JC, Toth BB, et al. Comparison of low-
6. Lippman SM, Hong WK. Retinoid chemoprevention of upper dose isotretinoin with beta-carotene to prevent oral carcinoge-
aerodigestive tract carcinogenesis. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, nesis. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 15.
Rosenberg SA, eds. Important advances in oncology. Philadel- 15. Chiesa F, Tradati N, Marazza M, et al. 4HPR in chemopre-
phia: Lippincott, 1992: 93. vention of oral leukoplakia. J Cell Biochem suppl., 1993; 17F:
7. Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM, Hong WK. Head 255.
and Neck Cancer. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 184. 16. Costa A, Formelli F, Chiesa F, et al. Prospects of chemopre-
8. Stick HF, Rosin MP, Vallejera MO. Reduction with vitamin A vention of human cancers with the synthetic retinoid fenretini-
and beta-carotene administration of proportion of micronu- de. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 2032.
cleated buccal mucosal cells in Asian betel nut and tobacco 17. Hong WK, Lippman SM, Itri LM, et al. Prevention of second
chewers. Lancet 1984; 1: 1204. primary tumors with 13cRA in squamous-cell carcinoma of
9. Stich HF, Homby AP, Dunn BP. A pilot beta-carotene inter- the head and neck. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 795.
vention trial with Inuits using smokeless tobacco. Int Cancer 18. Bolla M, Lefur R, Ton Van J, et al. Prevention of second pri-
VI. 353

mary tumours with etretinate in squamous-cell carcinoma of Drop-outs in tamoxifen prevention trials. Lancet 1999; 353:
the oral cavity and oropharynx. Results of a multicentric dou- 244.
ble-blind randomized study. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A: 767. 35. Powels T, Eeles R, Ashley S, et al. Interim analysis of the inci-
19. McLarry JW, Holiday DB, Girard WM, et al. Beta-carotene, dence of breast cancer in the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxi-
vitamin A and lung cancer chemoprevention: results of an in- fen randomised chemoprevention trial. Lancet 1998; 353: 98-
termediate endpoint study. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62 (Suppl): 101.
143IS. 36. Delmas PD, Bjarnason NH, et al. Effects of raloxifene on bone
20. Van Poppel G, Poulsen H, Loft S, Verhagen H. No influence mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine
of beta-carotene on oxidative DNA damage in male smokers. J endometrium in postenopausal women. N Engl J Med 1997;
Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 310. 337: 1641-1647.
21. Arnold AM, Browman GP, Levine MN, et al. The effect of the 37. Jordan VC, Glusman JE, Eckert S, et al. Raloxifen reduces in-
synthetic retinoid etretinate on sputum cytology: results from a cident primary breast cancers: integrated data from multicen-
randomized trial. Br J Cancer 1992; 65: 737. tre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials in po-
22. Kurie JM, Lee JS, Khuri FR, et al. 4-Hydroxyphenylretinami- stenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998; 50: 227.
de (4-HPR) in the reversal of bronchial metaplasia and dyspla- 38. Fanjul A, Dawson MI, Hobbs PD, et al. A new class of reti-
sia in smokers. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1999; 18: 473a (abst). noids with selective inhibition of AP-1 inhibits proliferation.
23. Lee JS, Lippman SM, Benner SE, et al. Randomized placebo- Nature 1994; 372: 107-111.
controlled trial of isotretinoin in chemoprevention of bron- 39. Costa A, Formelli F, Chiesa F, Decensi A, De Palo G, Verone-
chial squamous metaplasia. J Clin Oncol 1994b; 12: 937. si U. Prospects of chemoprevention of human cancers with the
24. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Stu- synthetic retinoid fenretinide. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 20342s-
dy Group. The effect of vitamin E and beta-carotene on the in- 2037s.
cidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. N 40. Favori RE, de Cupis A, Bruno S, et al. Modulation of the insu-
Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1029. linlike growth factor-I system by N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-retina-
25. Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, et al. Effects of a mide in human breast cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer 1998; 77:
combination of beta-carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer 2138-2147.
and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1150. 41. Sporn MB. Combination chemoprevention of cancer. Nature
26. Lee IM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE, Hennekens CH. 1980; 287: 107-108.
Beta-carotene supplementation and incidence of cancer and 42. Ratko TA, Detrisac CJ, Dinger NM, Thomas CF, Kelloff GJ,
cardiovascular disease: the Womens Health Study. J Natl Can- Moon RC. Chemoprevention efficacy of combined retinoid and
cer Inst 1999; 91: 2102. tamoxifen treatment following surgical excision of a primary
27. Salgo MG, Cueto R, Winston GW, Pryor WA. Beta-carotene mammary cancer in female rats. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 4472-
and its oxidation products have different effects on microsome 4476.
mediated binding of benzo [a] pyrene to DNA. Free Radical 43. Cobleigh MA, Dowlatshahi K, Deutsch TA, et al. Phase I/II
Biol Med 1998; 26: 162. trial of tamoxifen with or without fenretinide, an analog of vi-
28. Paolini M, Cantelli-Forci G, Peroccor P, et al. Co-carcinoge- tamin A, in women with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol
netic effect of b-carotene [Letter]. Nature 1999; 398: 760. 1993; 11: 474-477.
29. Pastorino U, Infante M, Maiolo M, et al. Adjuvant treatment 44. Conley B, OShaughnessy J, Prindiville S, et al. Pilot trial of
of stage I lung cancer with high-dose vitamin A. J Clin Oncol the safety, tolerability, and retinoid levels of N-(-4-hydroxy-
1993; 11: 1216. phenyl) retinamide in combination with tamoxifen in patients
30. Van Zandwijk N, Pastorino U, De Vries N, et al. Randomized at high risk for developing invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol
trial of chemoprevention with vitamin A and N-acetylcysteine 2000; 18: 275-283.
in patients with cancer of the upper and lower airways: the Eu- 45. Trialists Group. The ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or
roscan study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1999; 18: 464a(abst). in Combination). Anastrazole alone or in combination with ta-
31. Lippman SM, Lee JJ, Karp DD, et al. Phase III Intergroup moxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of po-
trial of 13-cis-retinoic acid to prevent second primary tumors stenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the
in stage I non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC): Interim Report of ATAC randomized trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2131-2139.
NCI # 119-0001. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17, 456a (abst): 46. Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Relationship
1753. of diet to risk of colorectal adenoma in men. J Natl Cancer
32. Fisher B, Constantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for Inst 1992; 84: 91.
prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical 47. Armstrong B, Doll R. Environmental factors and cancer inci-
Adjuvant Breast and Bowel P-1 Study. J. Natl Cancer Inst dence and mortality in different countries, with special referen-
1998; 90: 1371-1388. ce to dietary practices. Int J Cancer 1975; 15: 617.
33. Veronesi U, Maisonneuve P, Costa A, et al. Prevention of 48. Rose DP, Boyar AP, Wynder EL. International comparisons
breast cancer with tamoxifen: preliminary findings from the of mortality rates for cancer of the breast, ovary, prostate, and
Italian randomised trial among hysterectomised women. Ita- colon, and per capita food consumption. Cancer 1986; 58:
lian Tamoxifen Prevention Study. Lancet 1998; 352: 93-97. 2263.
34. Veronesi U, Maisonneuve P, Costa A, Rotmensz N, Boyle P. 49. Howe GR, Meeting Presentation. Advances in the biology and
354 OY

therapy of colorectal cancer. M.D. Andersons Thirty-seventh 69. Mesyskens FLJ, Gerner EW. Development of difluoromethyl-
Annual Clinical Conference. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, ornithine as a chemoprevention agent for the managenement
Houston, TX, 1993. of colon cancer. J Cell Biochem 1995; 22 (suppl.): 126-131.
50. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Relation of meat, 70. Love RR, Jacoby R, Newton MA, et al. A randomized, place-
fat, and fiber intake to the risk of colon cancer in a prospective bo-controlled trial of low-dose alpha-difluoromethylornithine
study among women. N Engl Med 1990; 323: 1664. in individuals at risk for colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol
51. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer pre- Biomarkers 1998; 7: 989-992.
vention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996; 96: 1027. 71. Smalley WE, DuBois RN. Colorectal cancer and nonsteroidal
52. Hill MJ. Cereals, cereal fibre and colorectal cancer risk; a re- anti-inflammatory drugs. Adv Pharmacol (New York) 1997; 39:
view of the epidemiological literature. Eur J Cancer Prev 1998; 1-20.
7: S5. 72. Rao CV, Rivenson A, Simi B, et al. Chemoprevention of colon
53. Moore MA, Park CB, Tsuda H. Soluble and insoluble fiber in- carcinogenesis by sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
fluences on cancer development. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1998; agent. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 1464-1472.
27: 229. 73. Waddell WR, Ganser GF, Cerise EJ, Loughry RW. Sulindac
54. Kritchevsky D. Dietary fibre and cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev for polyposis of the colon. Am J Surg 1989; 157: 175-179.
1997; 6: 435. 74. Taketo MM. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in tumorigenesis
55. Greenwald P, Clifford C. Fiber and cancer: prevention re- (part I). J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1529-1536.
search. In: Kritchevsky D, Benfield C, eds. Dietary fiber in 75. Taketo MM. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in tumorigenesis (part
health and disease. St. Paul: Eagen Press, 1995: 159. II). J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1609-1620.
56. Chaplin MF. Bile acids, fibre and colon cancer: the story un- 76. Eberhart CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, Giardiello FM, Ferren-
folds. J R Soc Health 1998; 118: 53. bach S, DuBois RN. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene
57. Nagengast FM, Grubben MJAL, Van Munster IP. Role of bile expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcino-
acids in colorectal carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: mas. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 1183-1188.
1067. 77. Oshima M, Dinchuk JE, Kargman SL, et al. Suppression of
58. Kritchevsky D. Cereal fibres and colorectal cancer: a search intestinal polyposis in Apc delta 716 knockout mice by inhibi-
for mechanisms. Eur J Cancer Prev 1998; 7: S33. tion of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Cell 1996; 87: 803-809.
59. Pickering JS, Lupton JR, Chapkin RS. Dietary fat, fiber, and 78. Yang VW, Shields JM, Hamilton SR, et al. Size-dependent in-
carcinogen alter fecal diacylglycerol composition and mass. Can- crease in prostanoid levels in adenomas of patients with fami-
cer Res 1995; 55: 2293. lial adenomatous polyposis. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 1750-1753.
60. Assert R, Kotter R, Bisping G, et al. Anti-proliferative activity 79. Donelly MT, Hawkey CJ. Review article: COX-II inhibitors a
of protein kinase C in apical compartments of human colonic new generation of safer NSAISs; Aliment Pharm Ther 1997;
crypts: evidence for a less activate protein kinase C in small a- 11: 227-236.
denomas. Int J Cancer 1999; 80: 47. 80. Thompson RC, Southgate I, Kitchener, et al. Multistage carci-
61. Scheppach W, Bartram HP, Richter F. Role of short-chain nogenesis induced by ras and myc oncogenes in a reconstituted
fatty activators prevention of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer organ. Cell 1989; 56: 917.
1995; 31A: 1077. 81. Carter HB, Piantadosi S, Isaacs JT. Clinical evidence for and
62. Lupton JR, Turner ND. Potential protective mechanisms of implications of the multistop development of prostate cancer.
wheat brain fiber. Am J Med 1999; 106: 24S. J Urol 1990; 143: 72.
63. Hassig CA, Tong JK, Schreiber SL. Fiber-derived butyrate and 82. Meikle AW, Smith JA, West DW. Familial factors affecting
the prevention of colon cancer. Chem Bil 1997; 4: 783. prostatic cancer risk and plasma sex-steroid levels. Prostate
64. The Womens Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the 1985; 6: 121.
Womens Health Initiative clinical trial and observational stu- 83. Gronberg H, Wiklund F, Damber JE. Age specific risks of fa-
dy. Controlled Clin Trials 1998; 19: 61. milial prostate carcinoma: a basis for screening recommenda-
65. Earnest DL, Sampliner RE, Roe DJ, et al. Progress report: the tions in high risk populations. Cancer 1999; 86: 477.
Arizona Phase III study of the effecy of wheast bran fiber on 84. Peehl DM, Wehner N, Stamey TA. Activated Ki-ras oncogene
recurrence of adenomatous colon polyps. Am J Med 1999; in human prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostate 1987; 10: 281.
106: 43S. 85. Carter BS, Epstein JL, Issacs WB. Ras gene mutations in hu-
66. Martinez ME, Ried ME, Guillen-Rodriguez J, et al. Design man prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 6830.
and baseline characteristics of study participants in the Wheat 86. Thompson TC, Southgate J, Kitchener G, Land H. Multistage
Bran Fiber trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 1998; 7: 813. carcinogenesis induced by ras and myc oncogenes in a recon-
67. eron JA, Beach M, Mandel JS, et al. Calcium Supplement for stituted organ. Cell 1989; 56Z: 917.
the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Preven- 87. Hockenbery DM. The bcl-2 oncogene and apoptosis. [Review].
tion Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 101-107. Semin Immunol 1992; 4: 413.
68. Vema AK. The enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitor of orni- 88. Reed JC, Cuddy M, Slabiak T, et al. Oncogenic potential of
thine decarboxylase, DL-alpha-difluromethylornithine: a che- bcl-2 demonstrated by gene transfer. Nature 1988; 336: 259.
moprevention agent. Prevent Med 1989; 18: 646-652. 89. Nanone NM, Troncoso P, Pisters LL, et al. p53 protein accu-
VI. 355

mulation and gene mutation in the progression of human pro- 98. Wang Y, Cprr JG, Thaler HT, et al. Decreased growth of e-
state carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1657. stablished human prostate LNCaP tumors in nude mice fed a
90. Bookstein R, MacGrogan D, Hilsenbeck SG, Sharkey F, low-fat diet. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1456.
Allred DC. p53 is mutated in a subset of advanced-stage pro- 99. Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Colditz CA, et al. A prospective
state cancers. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 3369. study of dietary fat and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer
91. Isaacs WB, Carter BS. Genetic changes associated with prosta- Inst 1993; 85: 1571.
te cancer in humans. Cancer Surv 1991; 11: 15. 100. Prestera T, Talalay P. Electrophile and antioxidant regulation
92. Bookstein R, Shew JY, Chen PL, Scully P, Lee WH. Suppres- of enzymes that detoxity carcinogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
sion of tumorigenicity of human prostate carcinoma cells by 1995; 92: 8965-8969.
replacing a mutated RB gene. Science 1990; 247: 712. 101. Clark LC, Dalkin B, Krongrand A, et al. Decreased incidence
93. Brooks JD, Weinstein M, Lin X, et al. CG island methylation of prostate cancer with selenium supplementation: results of a
changes near the GSTP1 gene in prostatic intraepithelial neo- double-blind cancer prevention trial. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 730.
plasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998; 7: 531-536. 102. Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci EL. What causes pro-
94. Lee WH, Issacs WB, Bova GS, et al. CG island methylation state cancer. A brief summary of the epidemiology. Semin
changes near the GSTP1 gene in prostatic carcinoma cells de- Cancer Bil 1998; 8: 263.
tected using the polymerase chain reaction: A new prostate 103. Gann PH, Ma J, Giovannucci E, et al. Lower prostate cancer
cancer biomarker. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6: risk in men with elevated plasma lycopene levels: results of a
443-450. prospective analysis. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 1225.
95. Lee WH, Morton RA, Epstein JL, et al. Cytidine methylation 104. Zhang Y, Kensler TW, Cho CG, et al. Anticarcinogenic neti-
of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transfe- vities of sulforaphane and structurally related synthetic nor-
rase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis. Proc bornyl isothiocyanates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:
Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 11733-11737. 3147-3150.
96. Sudduth SL, Koronkowski MJ. Finasteride: the first 5 alpha- 105. Kensler TW, He X, Otieno M, et al. Olsipraz chemopreven-
reductase inhibitor. Pharmacotherapy 1993; 13: 309. tion trial in Qidong, Peoples Republic of China: Modulation
97. Coltman CA Jr, Thompson IM Jr, Feigl P. Prostate Cancer of serum aflatoxin albumin adduct biomarkers. Cancer Epide-
Prevention Trial (PCPT) update. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 544. miol Biomarkers Prev 1998; 7: 127-134.

.

H ..
(tumour-associated),
, , -
-
. .
- -
- ,
, , - .
. O MHC (-
, - MHC class I, -
-
, - MHC class II).
, - -,
, - ,
, - .
(Major
. Histocompatibility Complex MHC)
O MHC class I , -
- -
- , MHC class II , -
. O - -
(antigen presenting cells APCs)
-

1. -
.
,
- (antigen present-
-
ing cells APCs) ,
. O
B-, , .., -

APCs (dendritic cells
,
DCs).
, -
(co-stimulatory molecules)
. B7 -
- APCs.
T- APCs
- : 1 --
- (T-cell receptor TCR) 2 CD28.
. O -
-
E E OOOI O CD28--
: . Thy-1, -2, CD2,
(tumour-specific), CD5, CD7 ..
- - -

357
358 OY

- (viral-specific antigens) -
: T-- (true mutated tumour-specific pro-
(CTLs), CD8, - teins) , -
T- (TH cells), CD4. T -
: TH1 cells, - , -
( IL-2, IL-3, IFN-, .
TNF-, TNF-, GM-CSF), TH2 cells, -
( IL-3, IL-4, IL-5,
IL-10, IL-13, TNF-, GM-CSF) TH0 cells, .
T 1 T 2. -
,
A O O (MUC-1),
(SPECIFIC TUMOUR ANTIGENS) 5,6.

. -- - (CTLs),
, - , -
() - .
MHC (Major Histocompatibility Complex) - -
I II. , - (genomic and proteomic tech-
nologies),
-. , - -
,
. (probe)
- DNA (tumour DNA
5 (. 1). libraries). -
- (cancer-testis -
antigens) - cDNA SEREX (serologic analysis of recom-
- binant cDNA expression libraries). O IgG -
(testicular germ cells)
. - ,
, - CD4+ T--
, , , - . -
, 2.
(differentiation antigens) -
-
- Ludwig -
3,4.

1.

A Y

MAGE MART / Melan-A HPV16 Beta-catenin MUC-1


GAGE gp100 E6 / E7 MCM-1 Sialyl-Tn
BAGE tyrosinase EBV MCM-3
RAGE TRP-2 LMP1 p53
LAGE PSA HTLV p15
SAGE CEA p16
HAGE HER2 / neu caspase
NY-ESO-1 EGFR HLA-A2
all X-linked RU2AS
VI. 359

(http://www.licr.org/SEREX.html).
- (transfected), -
- (tumour-associated genes).
7,8. - O (non-cellular vaccines)
- :
, A-
X ,
-
, , ..,
. -
-

, ..
- (self proteins),
-
, -
(recombinant viruses).
-
CTL9. - A O (CELLULAR VACCINES)

, O -
. - -
-
- . -
, , -
- ,
MHC , -
. - -- -
-, (APCs) . O
-
- -
10. , (-
-
E OY OOY )
- (
- ). -
, -
-
. ,
, (cellular vaccines) - .
:
O ( (
) ) -
, , -
: , -
- , BCG, , GM-CSF
, .., ..11.
, (naked) DNA, -
- OO A O
, O
(vector)
, . O ,
(fused)
, , -
(pulsed) .
, -
360 OY

-
- -
BCG. . -
98 - - , Melacine -
Dukes B2 C3, - , 18.
Melacine
BCG (OncoVax) , ,
93 . -
Melacine

12. - , -
ECOG 412 - LA
-
- HLA-A2
13. HLA-C3, -
254 - 19.
Dukes B C
A OOOE A
, 3 O
6 .
C,
B
, ,
(IL-2, GM-CSF, TNF, IFN-) , CD80,
14. CD8620.
(transfection / transduction)
OH A O
(, ..).
-
/
(shared antigens) -
,
.
, .


, -
, -
C (MHC mismatch)
-
. O
21. -
Morton 15 -
-
, G-CSF -
22 -
16. ( GVax) (.
1).
, CancerVax, GM-CSF -

BCG, (NSCLC) 3 (CRs)
. 5 26 , -
26% 23. -
6% , - -
IV 17. - -
Me- (naked) DNA -
lacine (Corixa, Seattle, WA), gene
gun DNA
Detox. (DNA-coated gold beads),
VI. 361

GM-CSF

GM-CSF
CD8 T-
TCR


CD28

B7



HLA

HLA

CD4 T-


ex vivo

E 1. GM-CSF .

. - ) 27. O -
- , -
, -
-. . -
- -
A Y O -28. -
A O (loaded with peptides) -
- (TAAs)
- (antigen-presenting cells). -
C , 29.

, - 5 -
- -ras
24. - (Cs),
- (pulsed) ,
L-4 G- 30.
CSF 25,26. O - , -
, - , MUC,
MAGE, MART-1, gp100 / tyrosinase ..31, -
, - . -
, - -
- -
. - . -
(hybrids) -
( -
) ( - 25%
- , -
362 OY

30% - . -
30,32. - , , -
CTL ,
- -
, 16
18 , - -
- .
33. :
- -
, ,
CTL . (
- ) .
. ,
17 - OOA
- -
4 (CRs), 2 - ,
(PRs) 2 (SDs)34. -
- -,
, - (idiotype) -
35. -
- 40. -
, -
, - ( -
. - , single chain Fv)
(-
(prostate specific antigen SA) )41,42.
(prostate specific - -
membrane antigens PSMA, prostate acid phosphatase -
PAP), - - 43. - CEAVac -
, 8019, -
SA CEA (carcinoem-
50%, 30% 36,37. - bryonic antigen)
-
R SA 3 .

- -
(anti-PSA T-cell response) - CEA. -
11 13 - CEAVac -
38. -
, , , , -
. -
, -
(.
, ), .
- CEAVac -
- 39. /
Dukes
A O C,
(NON-CELLULAR VACCINES) -
- 44,45.
, -- -
VI. 363

. ,
- TriAb, HMFG [.. - (CEA) -
(Human milk fat globulin) 23 ]48,49.
- - -
, - - -
. - -
- . , elan-A / MART-1
. - , gp100, -
- -
46. GE
50. -
E OA O ex vivo, -
(PURIFIED IMMUNOGENS) HLA /
(peptide tetramer staining technique), -
- in vitro 51.
O -
- (APCs). -
, 100
- 1.000 g , -
, (carbohydrates) , ,
(gangliosides). 2050% , -
(adjuvants) -
.
- -
. ,
, - ( -) , -
(shared antigens) -
-, 52. -
-
- . -
810 -
, , -
PCR. . -
in vivo - , -
- , -
(adjuvants) 20%, -
- 53,54,55.
. -
in vitro, -
- .
-
47. -
O -
. - 10. , -
HLA-- - -
T- , in vitro (BLs) ,
ex vivo - 56.
. -
- (adjuvants)
Melan-A/MART-1, gp100, MAGE-3, , G-CSF, -
HLA-A2, Cs 57.
364 OY

, HER2 / neu (tu-


- mour rejection antigen) 63, DNA
- neu
, FA (incomplete Freunds
adjuvant). - HER2 / neu transgenic 64. HER2 / neu
, -
FA, G-CSF QS-21, HER2 / neu -
() , Fc ( ).
QS-21 G-CSF ,
FA - 58. .
,
,
20 59. - .
-ras,
90% --
, V , - (CTLs), -
(CIN). . CTLs , -
- , CTLs -
, (low affinity)
(ignorant),
(50%) CI. O - CTLs .
, , -


. Polymorphic Epithelial Mu-
cin (PEM) Mucin-1 (MUC-1: cancer-associated
R2/neu - mucin), -
- . O -- , -
- 65,66,
G-CSF -- > 90% . MUC-1
60. HER2/neu ,
67. -
. - -
- - . MUC-1-
KLH + QS-21 -
. . -
i.d. +/ GM-CSF 26 , -
64 . , , -
68. -
- , 5
HER2/neu - UC-5, -
. -
(epitope spread)61. - --
E75, HER2/neu - .
HLA-A2- , 14 -
i.d. +/ GM-CSF , Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF)
. - Sialyl-Tn (sTn),
- -
HER2 / neu, -
/ KLH (key-
62. hole limpet hemocyanin),
VI. 365

Detox GM2-BCG -
quillaja saponaria69,70. - 74,75. -
Theratope ( Sialyl-Tn-KLH +/
Detox-B), . Intergroup (E1694), -
/ - GM2-KLH / QS-21 FN-2b
> 400 . -
- .
-
. (- 76.
).
Theratope 40 O IO OO
-
, (V), -
, - . -
71. C
- V FA 50% -
- 58. O -
V, - -
, > 4 - -
- ,
. -V , ,
, - - V,
950 77.
1 , -
heratope - -
sTn, / -
KLH-Detox. O - (genetic vaccination / recombinant vaccines)
(ime to progression, TP) - O -
.
. -
(gangliosides) (vectors) ,
-
(plasmids).
, , , -
, - , -
. , (Major
- Histocombatibility Complex MHC) -
- (co-stimulatory molecules).
,
. ,

72.
- . -
1995 Livingston et al73. To
GM2, ,

. , -
GM2 CG cross-priming.
CG 122
. -
DNA .
366 OY

,
- , APCs -
. , -
, (downregulation)
MHC I
. -
, 5 (adenovirus 5) (TGF-, Fas ligand)81
(bias) -
RT-1 gp100
, 1 APCs,
16 , (co-stimulatory
, molecules)
78. -
.
, pox (poxvirus)
- IOO
CEA -
(canarypox vaccinia-based .
vector ALVAC) , ,
79. . -
-
OI H O ,
O O OOOO Y

-
. ,
- . ,
, , MHC, -
, -
. - ,
(
, - ), -
, --
, CD4+T-, , - .
, -
- , -
. . -
-
- -
- (immune surveillance). - . H ,
CTLs -
, , -
, Fas-Fas ligand, Tumour necro- -
sis factor (TNF), T- ,
. - -
- . ,
80. -
-
82.
:
VI. 367

1. Espinoza-Delgado I. Cancer vaccines. Oncologist 2002; 7 (sup- distant metastases receiving polyvalent melanoma cell vaccine.
pl 3): 20-33. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2913-2920.
2. Boon T, Old LJ. Cancer tumour antigens. Curr Opin Immunol 18. Mitchell MS, Rechtman DJ, Von Eschen KB. A randomised
1997; 9: 681-683. phase III trial of Melacine versus combination chemotherapy
3. Rosenberg SA. Interleukin-2 and the development of immu- in patients with disseminated melanoma. Can J Infect Dis 1995;
notherapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Cancer J 6 (suppl C): 347.
Sci Am 2000; 6 (suppl 3): S2-S7. 19. Sosman JA, Unger JM, Liu PY, et al. Adjuvant immunothera-
4. Wang RF, Rosenberg SA. Human tumour antigens for cancer py of resected, intermediate thickness, node-negative melano-
vaccine development. Immunol Rev 1999; 170: 85-100. ma with an allogeneic tumour vaccine: impact of HLA class I
5. Gilewski T, Ragupathi G, Bhuta S, et al. Immunisation of me- antigen expression on outcome. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2067-
tastatic breast cancer patients with a fully synthetic globo H 2075.
conjugate: a phase I trial. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 20. Gilboa E, Lyerly HK. Specific active immunotherapy of cancer
3270-3275. using genetically modified tumour vaccines. Biol Ther Cancer
6. Holmberg LA, Oparin DV, Gooley T, et al. Clinical outcome 1994; 6: 1-16.
of breast and ovarian cancer patients treated with high-dose 21. Parmiani G, Rodolfo M, Melani C. Immunological gene thera-
chemotherapy, autologous stem-cell rescue and THERATO- py with ex vivo gene modified tumour cells: a critique and a re-
PE STn-KLH cancer vaccine. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; appraisal. Hum Gen Ther 2000; 11: 1269-1275.
25: 1233-1241. 22. Dranoff G, Soiffer R, Lynch T, Mihm M. A phase I study of
7. Tureci O, Sahin U, Pfreundschuh M. Serological analysis of vaccination with autologous irradiated melanoma cells engi-
human tumour antigens: molecular definition and implications. neered to secrete human GM-CSF. Human Gene Therapy
Mol Med Today 1997; 3: 342-349. 1997; 8: 111-123.
8. Le Naouf F, Misek DE, Krause MC, et al. Proteomics-based i- 23. Nemunaitis JJ, Smith J, Sterman D, et al. A phase I/II trial of
dentification of RS/DJ-1 as a novel circulating tumour antigen bystander GVAX cancer vaccine in non-small cell lung cancer
in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 3328-3335. (NSCLC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21: 13a.
9. Houghton AN. Cancer antigens: immune recognition of self 24. Steinman RM, Dodhapkar M. Active immunisation against
and altered self. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 1-4. cancer with dendritic cells: the near future. Int J cancer 2001;
10. Disis ML, Cheever MA. Oncogenic proteins as tumor anti- 94: 459-473.
gens. Curr Opin Immunol 1996; 8: 637-642. 25. Kochman S, Bernard J. Antitumour immune response and
11. Soiffer R, Lynch T, Mihm M, et al. Vaccination with irradiated cancer vaccination: the critical role of dendritic cells. Curr Med
autologous melanoma cells engineered to secret human granu- Res Opin 1999; 15: 321-326.
locyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor generates potent 26. Hart D. Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which
antitumour immunity in patients with metastatic melanoma. control the primary immune response. Blood 1997; 90: 3245-
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 13141-13146. 3287.
12. Hoover H, Brandhorst J, Peters L, et al. Adjuvant active speci- 27. Gong J, Dongshu C, Masahiro K, et al. Induction of antitu-
fic immunotherapy for human colorectal cancer. 6.5 year me- mour activity by immunisation with fusions of dendritic and
dian follow-up of a Phase III prospectively randomised trial. J carcinoma cells. Nature Med 1997; 3: 558-561.
Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 390-399. 28. Guo Y, Wu M, Chen H, et al. Effective tumour vaccine gene-
13. Harris J, Ryan L, Adams G, et al. Survival and relapse in adju- rated by fusion of hepatoma cells with activated B cells. Scien-
vant autologous tumour vaccine therapy for Dukes B and C ce 1994; 263: 518-520.
colon cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1994; 13: 294. 29. Mayordomo J, Zorina T, Storkus W, et al. Bone marrow-de-
14. Vermorken JB, Blaessen Anke ME, van Tinteren H, et al. A- rived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumour peptides eli-
ctive specific immunotherapy for stage II and stage III human cit protective and therapeutic antitumour immunity. Nature
colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 345-350. Med 1995; 1: 1297-1302.
15. Morton D, Foshag L, Hoon D, et al. Prolongation of survival 30. Gjertsen MK, Bakka A, Breivik J, et al. Vaccination with mu-
in metastatic melanoma after active specific immunotherapy tant ras peptides and induction of T-cell responsiveness in pan-
with a new polyvalent melanoma vaccine. Ann Surg 1992; 216: creatic carcinoma patients carrying the corresponding RAS mu-
463-483. tation. Lancet 1995; 346: 1399-1400.
16. Wallack M, Sivanandam M, Balch C, et al. Surgical adjuvant 31. Nestle F, Alijagics S, Gilliet M, et al. Vaccination of melanoma
active specific immunotherapy for patients with stage III mela- patients with peptide-or tumour lysate-pulsed dendritic cells.
noma: final analysis of data from a phase III randomised dou- Nature Med 1998; 4: 328-332.
ble blind multi-center vaccinia melanoma oncolysate trial. J 32. Schadendorf D, Nestle FO. Autologous dendritic cells for
Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 69-77. treatment of advanced cancer- an update. Recent Res Cancer
17. Hsueh EC, Gupta RK, Qi K, Morton DL. Correlation of speci- Res 2001; 158: 236-248.
fic immune responses with survival in melanoma patients with 33. Banchereau J, Palucka AK, Dhodapkar M, et al. Immune and
368 OY

clinical response in patients with metastatic melanoma to mour-reactive CTL from peripheral blood and tumour-infil-
CD34+ progenitor-derived dendritic cell vaccine. Cancer Res trating lymphocytes of melanoma patients by in vitro stimula-
2001; 61: 6451-6458. tion with an immunodominant peptide of the human melano-
34. Kugler A, Stuhler G, Walden P, et al. Regression of human ma antigen MART-1. J Immunol 1995; 154: 2257-2265.
metastatic renal cell carcinoma after vaccination with tumour 50. Benlalam H, Labarriere N, Lienard B, et al. Comprehensive a-
cell-dendritic cell hybrids. Nat Med 2000; 3: 332-336. nalysis of the frequency of recognition of melanoma-associat-
35. Trefzer U, Weingart G, Chen T, et al. Hybrid cell vaccination ed antigen (MAA) by CD8 melanoma infiltrating lymphocytes
for cancer immunotherapy: first clinical trial with metastatic (TIL): implications for immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol 2001;
melanoma. Int J Cancer 2000; 85: 618-626. 31: 2007-2015.
36. Small EJ, Fratesi P, Reese DM, et al. Immunotherapy of hor- 51. Romero P, Dunbar R, Valmori D, et al. Ex-vivo staining of
mone-refractory prostate cancer with antigen loaded dendritic metastatic lymph nodes by class I major histocompatibility
cells. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3894-3903. complex tetramers reveals high numbers of antigen-experienc-
37. Murphy GP, Tjoan BA, Simmons SJ, et al. Infusion of dendri- ed tumour-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 1998;
tic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific mem- 188: 1641-1650.
brane antigen peptides: a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial 52. Ogg GS, Dunbar PR, Romero P, et al. High frequency of skin-
involving patients with hormone-refractory metastatic disease. homing melanocyte-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in auto-
Prostate 1999; 38: 73-78. immune vitiligo. J Exp Med 1998; 188: 1203-1208.
38. Heiser A, Coleman D, Dannull J, et al. Autologous dendritic 53. Cormier JN, Salgaller ML, Prevette T, et al. Enhancement of
cells transfected with prostate-specific antigen RNA stimulate cellular immunity in melanoma patients immunised with a pe-
CTL responses against metastatic prostate tumours. J Clin In- ptide from MART-1/Melan-A. Cancer J Sci Am 1997; 3: 37-44.
vest 2002; 109: 409-417. 54. Marchand M, van Baren N, Weynants P, et al. Tumour regres-
39. Parmiani G, Pilla L, Castelli C, Rivoltini L. Vaccination of pa- sion observed in patients with metastatic melanoma treated
tients with solid tumours. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 817-824. with an antigenic peptide encoded by gene MAGE-3 and pre-
40. Kwak LW, Campbell MJ, Czerwinski DK, et al. Induction of sented by HLA-A1. Int J Cancer 1999; 80: 219-230.
immune responses in patients with B-cell lymphoma against 55. Belli F, Testori A, Rivoltini L, et al. Vaccination of metastatic
the surface-immunoglobulin idiotype expressed by their tu- melanoma patients with autologous tumour-derived heat shock
mours. New Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1209-1215. protein peptide-complex-96 (Oncophage): clinical and immu-
41. Hawkins R, Zhu D, Ovecka M, et al. Idiotypic vaccination nological findings. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4169-4180.
against human B-cell lymphoma. Rescue of variable region 56. Lee KH, Wang E, Nielsen MB, et al. Increased vaccine-speci-
gene sequences from biopsy material for assembly as single- fic T cell frequency after peptide-based vaccination correlates
chain Fv personal vaccines. Blood 1994; 83: 3279-3288. with increased susceptibility to in vitro stimulation but does
42. Vuist WM, Levy R, Maloney DG. Lymphoma regression in- not lead to tumor regression. J Immunol 1999; 163: 6292-6300.
duced by monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies correlates with 57. Gjersten MK, Buanes T, Rosseland AR, et al. Intradermal ras
their ability to induce Ig signal transduction and is not preven- peptide vaccination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-sti-
ted by tumour expression of high levels of bcl-2 protein. Blood mulating factor as adjuvant: clinical and immunological res-
1994; 83: 899-906. ponses in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Int J Can-
43. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee M, Chatterjee SK, Foon KA. Anti- cer 2001; 92: 441-450.
idiotype vaccine against cancer. Immunol Lett 2000; 74: 51-58. 58. Schaed SG, Klimek VM, Panageas KS, et al. T-cell response
44. Foon KA, Chakraborty M, John WJ, et al. Immune response against tyrosinase 368-376(370D) peptide in HLA*A0201+
to the carcinoembryonic antigen in patients treated with an melanoma patients: randomised trial comparing the incomple-
anti-idiotype vaccine. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 334-342. te Freunds adjuvant, granulocyte macrophage colony stimu-
45. Foon KA, Chakraborty M, John WJ, et al. Clinical and immu- lating factor, and QS-21 as immunological adjuvants. Clin Can-
ne responses in resected colon cancer patients treated with cer Res 2002; 8: 967-972.
anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody vaccine that mimics the car- 59. Muderspach L, Wilczynski S, Roman L et al. A phase I trial of
cinoembryonic antigen. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2889-2895. a human papilloma virus (HPV) peptide vaccine for women
46. Reece DE, Foon KA, Chatterjee MB, et al. Use of anti-idioty- with high grade cervical and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia
pe breast cancer vaccine 11D10 in conjuction with autologous who are HPV16 positive. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 3406-3416.
stem cell transplantation in patients with metastatic breast 60. Disis ML, Gooley TA, Rinn K, et al. Generation of T-cell im-
cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2003; 3 (suppl 4): S152-S157. munity to the HER2/neu protein after active immunization
47. Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Schwartzentruber DJ, et al. Immuno- with her2/neu peptide-based vaccines. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:
logic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine 2624-2632.
for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat 61. Disis ML, Grabstein KH, Sleath PR, et al. Generation of im-
Med 1998; 4: 321-327. munity to the HER-2/neu oncogenic protein in patients with
48. Renkvist N, Castelli C, Robbins PF, et al. A listing of human breast and ovarian cancer using a peptide-based vaccine. Clin
tumour antigens recognised by T lymphocytes. Cancer Immu- Cancer Res 1999; 5: 1289-1297.
nol Immunother 2001; 50: 3-15. 62. Disis ML, Knutson KL, Schiffman K, et al. Pre-existent immu-
49. Rivoltini L, Kawakami Y, Sakaguchi K, et al. Induction of tu- nity to the HER-2/neu-oncogenic protein in patients with
VI. 369

HER-2/neu overexpressing breast and ovarian cancer. Breast ed by normal and malignant tissues. J Clin Immunol 2000; 20:
Cancer Re Treat 2000; 62: 245-252. 85-93.
63. Reilly RT, Gottlieb MB, Ercolini AM, et al. HER-2/neu is a 73. Livingston PO, Wong GYC, Adluri S, et al. Improved survival
tumour rejection target in tolerized HER-2/neu transgenic mi- in stage III melanoma patients with GM2 antibodies: a rando-
ce. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 3569-3576. mised trial of adjuvant vaccination with GM2 ganglioside. J
64. Amici , Smorlesi A, Noce G, et al. DNA vaccination with Clin Oncol 1995; 12: 1036-1044.
full-length or truncated neu induces protective immunity against 74. Helling F, Zhang A, Shang A, et al. GM2-KLH conjugate vac-
the development of spontaneous mammary tumours in HER- cine: increased immunogenicity in melanoma patients after ad-
2/neu transgenic mice. Gene Ther 2000; 7: 703-706. ministration with immunological adjuvant QS-21. Cancer Res
65. Taylor-Papadimitriou J, Stewart L, Burchell J, et al. The poly- 1995; 55: 2783-2788.
morphic epithelial mucin as a target for immunotherapy. Ann 75. Minasian LM, Yao TJ, Steffens TA, et al. A phase I study of
NY Acad Sci 1993; 690: 69-79. anti-GD3 ganglioside monoclonal antibody R24 and recombi-
66. Kotera Y, Fontenot JD, Pecher G, et al. Human immunity nat human macrophage colony stimulating factor in patients
against a tandem repeat epitope of human mucin MUC-1 in with metastatic melanoma. Cancer 1995; 75: 2251-2257.
sera from breast, pancreatic and colon cancer patients. Cancer 76. Kirkwood JM, Ibrahim JG, Sosman JA, et al. High dose inter-
Res 1994; 54: 2856-2860. feron -2b significantly prolongs relapse-free and overall survi-
67. Hareuveni M, Gautier C, Kieny MP, et al. Vaccination against val compared with the GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccine in patients
tumour cells expressing breast cancer epithelial tumour anti- with resected stage IIB-III melanoma: results of intergroup trial
gen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 9498-9502. E1694/S9512/C509801. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2370-2380.
68. Gilewski , Adluri S, Ragupathi G, et al. Vaccination of high 77. Harro CD, Pang Y-YS, Roden RB, et al. Safety and immuno-
risk breast cancer patients with mucin-1 (MUC1) keyhole lim- genicity trial in adult volunteers of a human papillomavirus
pet hemocyanin conjugate plus QS-21. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 16L1 virus-like particle vaccine. J Natl cancer Inst 2001; 93:
6: 1693-1701. 284-292.
69. Miles D, Towlson K, Graham R, et al. A randomised phase II 78. Rosenberg SA, Zhai Y, Yang JC, et al. Immunising patients
study of sialyl-Tn and DETOX-B adjuvant with or without cy- with metastatic melanoma using recombinant adenoviruses en-
clophosphamide pretreatment for the active specific immuno- coding MART-1 or gp100 melanoma antigens. J Natl Cancer
therapy of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1996; 74: 1292-1296. Inst 1998; 90: 1894-1900.
70. Adluri S, Helling F, Ogata S, et al. Immunogenicity of synthe- 79. Berinstein NL. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a target for the-
tic TF-KLH (keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and sTn-KLH con- rapeutic anticancer vaccines: a review. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:
jugates in colorectal carcinoma patients. Cancer Immunol Im- 2197-2207.
munother 1995; 41: 185-192. 80. Marincola FM, Jaffe EM, Hicklin DJ, et al. Escape of human
71. Sandmaier BM, Oparin DV, Holmberg LA, et al. Evidence of solid tumours from T cell recognition: molecular mechanisms
a cellular immune response against sialyl-Tn in breast and ova- and functional significance. Adv Immunol 2000; 74: 181-271.
rian cancer patients after high-dose chemotherapy, stem cell 81. Andreola G, Rivoltini L, Castelli C, et al. Induction of lympho-
rescue, and immunisation with Theratope STn-KLH cancer cytes apoptosis by tumour cell secretion of FasL-bearing mi-
vaccine. J Immunother 1999; 22: 54-66. crovesicles. J Exp Med 2002; 195: 1303-1316.
72. Livingston PO, Ragupathi G, Musselli C. Autoimmune and 82. Berd D. Cancer vaccines: reborn or just recycled? Semin On-
antitumour consequences of antibodies against antigens shar- col 1998; 25: 605-610.

.

O OI (contrast)
-
-.

3.
. -
- : )
, -
. (
1913 ) ) -
Albert Solomon - .
. 80 -
- -
. -
. -
, -
. -
- 4.
, (/ ),
(, ), - -
, . - ,
, - ,
.
. - ) --
-
1,2. , ) , ) -
- -
, - , )
, - , ) -
, ) -
. .
- O
, ( ).
- -
. .
- (45) (mediolateral oblique)
- -
, . ,
- . : )
- , ) -
. - ,

371
372 OY

) ) .
. ( 100%) -
(cranio caudal) - -
, (50% , 3040% -
- 90% in situ
. ).
: ) -
) - , 2535% -
. (
O ).
, - (interval cancers).
(spot compression views), ( -
(magnification views) (tan- )
genital views), - (6570%).
. 5:
O , - -
,
-
. , , , -
O

. (98%
O ) -
-
, -
,
. - -
90 - .
,
, -
, (-
-
. ,
O , , ,
- , ).
.
(
( Eklund - , , )6.
-
).
- ,
-
- . -
,
.
( - .
)
8590% ( 10% .
),
100%. , (, -
-
VI. 373

), - -
(, - 50% 50%
, , , - 1,11,8 mGy7.
) -
7.

- . -
, - . O -
, - , -
, - -
, - , ,
- -
8. -
, -
, - .
, -
- OOH OH O
. - O OE OE -
, - E AO I
, - O . -
,
- . O
. - , . O
-
9. ()
10.
, - -
- (
() - ), -
(phantom). .
, phantom (-
. ),
-
(contrast), - .
. -
(grid) 2530 KV,

0,003 mm. .
(AEC) ,
- ,
( ) 11. -
. , ,
, -
. .
contrast ( -
. ). O
- ,
( 3 mm , -
1 mm) - . O Cooper -
-
. .
374 OY

( ) -
- -
- .
. -
, .
12. -
, -
, - .
, -
/ . - , -
. -
-
: , -
) - 9899% (, -
. ).
) - O -
. -
) -
.
6 3 (
OOH OH OOI 12%).
-
H
FNAC (

-
. -
) Core Biopsy ( -
,
).
,



. 14.

,
, - () -
. () .
O (-
( ), )
, - .
(- ,
) . , (radial scar) -
O , -
( ), - ,
, , - . -
. -
- .
.
.
,
. . -
, , , , - , ,
-
13.
, .
VI. 375

- ,
, , ) -
. - , , -
( , , , ,
) . .
- : ) , ) -
, - , ) ( )
- , ) , ) -
(). .
-
- OH I OOO
. -
-
. -
.
. , , -
- .
,
. , ,
0,5 mm, - . -
, 0,5 mm. - .
- ( ), -
. 1/3 (, -
- ) -
(in situ) . O - .
, -
O
.
, , ,
-
.
( -
), ( ), - i.
(pop-corn), - , -
( , .
, ), -
( - ii.
, ) - -
. -
- .
() . : ) , ) -
- , ) -
, - , ) ) .
, , - , ,
. -
,
5 1 cm. 30% - .
,
, . -
: ) , ) , ) , ) -
1,5 mm. , ) , ) , ) -
, ) , ) , ) , ) -
. : ) , ) , ) , )
- .
376 OY

, . , -
- , , -
, 2%. .
O - ()
. . -
(TDLU, terminal duct lobu-
lar unit) - .
.
, -
, - .
- O
. -
, - . O -
. -

- .
. - -
, , -
. - .
-
. - -
- . -
. , , -
.
-
, 30. ,
, - ( -
. pop-corn - ). -
, , , -
. - , ,
, 25% - ,
.
. - .
O
.

115 .
. -
-
( -
) -
.
-

( -
),
.
.
E 1. 48 -
O - .
. 0,3 .,
, , .
VI. 377

, - -
-
(. 1), - . -
-
. in situ () - ,
, - . -
. - -
, () .
.
iii.
( -
, ). ,
O 16. -
, , -
- ( ) .
. , , -
- .
. ,
. -
- .
. iv.
.
-
(, )
. O -
.
- .

-
-
. -
. : ) , )
. O
, ) ) ,
, -
,
-
.
.
.
. O v.
- -
, . O
.
.
, - vi.
NOS (not
otherwise specified), - -
, 6580%. 3
14% . -
. , 20 30.
O , O 3050 -
, -
. - .
, 5 .
-
- .
-
. - . -
, , - -
. - ,
378 OY

. -
-
.

OH I O-

O -

. 3050%
.
O
. 90% DCIS
E 2. 60 -
(ductal carcinoma in situ) 70% -
.
( 0,5 . -
DCIS) - DCIS comedo.
17 (. 2).
O - , -
. O
) (. 1) )
- (. 2). -
. , , -
-
- (. 3).

1.

I.
( )
( , , )
( )
( , , )
pop-corn ( )
(, , )
milk of calcium ( , )
( )
( )
( 1 mm, , )
II.
( , )
III.
(, . 0,5 mm)
/ ()

2.

O : (< 2 cm3)
:
: ( )
: ( )
: ( )
VI. 379

,
3.
( ). -
I. . , , .
O -


12 mm. -
O
, , -
II. ,
.
()


-
.
.
A OH O O -
O -
(1 mm ) -
. - .
-
, H A OH
. ,
O - , .
,
. , , : )
, (>1 cm).
. , -
- , ) ,
, , ) -
(). - 18.
-
. , , , -
O , ,
. -
. .
-
(). .
. - -
. . -
O pop-corn - -
. -
- .
. - O -
-
. A - .
-
, - , 90%
. .
O , - -
, -
, ,
. () (. 3). -
O milk of calcium - -
,
380 OY

-
-
20.

. -

. -
(BIRADS cat III) -
. follow up
1 -
4 . -
.
, .

O OEO O
-
-
,
-
E 3. 48 . -
. -
, -
-
(). , (25 -
, -
) , -
(branching) ,
DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ). 3 .
-
. .
. O ( -
56 ) 3
. O - .
- 2
. - (
, . 3 ).
O -
I O
. 5 -
-
, - . -
19. -
O 5 , -
, , ,
-
. , -
-
OH O .
O OO -
.
,
. O- 5%
- 10% . -
5 . -
-
VI. 381

21. - -
: ) - screening
, ) - . -
(.. - ,
), ) ( , .
,
- , -
)24. - , -
: ) , - -
(.. - , ,
, - -
), ) .
( ), )
(- -
, , -
)22,23. -
27.
. -
- 1921 G, 79 cm.
-
,
, (hook)
.
- 12 .. ( ).
. O O
- , ,
, - 12
. - , -
-
25,26. , -
3
4 , , .
. -
, (specimen mammogra-
. phy) -
28.
, - O (.. -
, , - ) -
( ) - , ,
, , - ,
, , ( - , -
). .

E A O OH , -
OH , -
- ,
,
, ,
. - .
- (add-on) -
, -
382 OY

, -
, - -
, - . CB
, -
. ,
- ( , ) -
(add-on) .
. , -
- . -
,
, -
, , , -
, .
20 21G.
- O BIRADS OA
(18G), - OOY EO
( - ,
)29.
-
, , -
30. -
(
- screening ), (-
, ) ,
, .
, BIRADS (Breast Imaging Re-
- porting and Data System). 6
, 32:
(FNAC) Cat 0: . -
- .
(16G) (Core biopsy Cat I: , -
CB). CB - .
, 31. - Cat I: .
FNAC CB : Cat III: .
) . Cat IV: .
) - Cat V: .
. cat II : -
) - , -
, , DNA .. -
) - , , , -
- ( -
. ), -
, , -
, milk
FNAC, CB. of calcium.
FNAC cat III : )
- ,
, - ) , , -
, )
,
VI. 383

, ) , - -
.
, (
- OOO EO O
), ) ( ) - OI
( , ) O -
. . O -
cat IV -
- -
, 25%, , -
. () ,
cat V
, , - 50%.
O
, , - :
. )
O IV 4 - )
V.
- ) .
BIRADS cat II 0%,
cat III 23%, cat IV 2030% cat V -
7080%. ,
... cat III -
-
612 24 . Si- , .
ckles 10% cat III, -
O E OE A
, -
OI
-
033. cat IV O -
1985
( -
core biopsy). - -
, -
. - : 2235 KV,
IV - , -
34. , / , 3
1 mm, 650 mm, -
Susan G. Komen, Dallas Texas, (bucky), -

(needle core biopsy) cat IV. - (C: Auto Exposure Control), -
- (24 30 cm) (18 24 cm)
( ).
. A -
-
.
O - contrast,
(- .
) -
. -
, , - ,
, - ( ), -
384 OY

, , , -
- V.

. (underexposure).

OO E E Y- .
A -
- (-
- , -
: , masking ).
(contrast)
-


O . , , -
,
(, -
. ),
contrast.
( MLO CC) (sharpness) -
- -
. . .
- O (noise)
.
- , . O
, , - -
. .
MLO , - -
, -
- .
. CC - , ,
- -
. .
, - , -
. -

(18 24 cm) , -
.
( ) , ,
. , -
(KV, ms) -
- .
, -
, - I
. , (OY OOO OY)
, ACR,
. :
, 1. -
MA/sec. .
phototimer 2. 240 -
mAs 6 .
VI. 385

3. 480 . 5 -
4. 40 3 76% -
. 20%, -
O ( , , ,
: ).
1. . 5
2. -
1 - (screen-
. ing). -
3. 5 -
.

O .
: -
1. . (in
2. - situ ).
. -
3. 5
. , -
ACR - .
- : )
. )
.

, .

-
Test phantom
-
. -
AEC, KVp . 1960 Egan


-
. -
, Shapiro
OI O OO EO ,
(SCREENING)
M in situ .
, - -
..., ,
12,6% (1 8 ). -
,
. lead time bias ( -
1999 181.000 ,
44.000 ) length-bias sampling ( -
.
). -
-
, -
, 5 97%. - -
386 OY

.
. -
.
.

, (NBSS)36. O
- . -
. - (intervals)
.
( ) -
. , 1 , -
2, 4 6 -
. -
, - 3, 5 7 . O
, - Kopparberg Ostergottland
(p 0,05). (Two-County trial), Stockholm, Malmo Gothenberg
To 1963 -
HIP (Health Insurance Plan of New York), - , . -
- ( -
4 31.000 11%
4064 , )37.
62.000 . O 32.000 50 24 .
Gothenberg 18 -
. 4 , HIP NBSS -
, . ,
2/3 , -
. group 4049,
1977 Shapiro , NBSS -
9 -
: 30% - ( -
)38.
.
1014 . 1989 National Cancer Insti-
HIP - tute American Cancer Society,
,
- : -
35. (baseline mammo-
O - graphy) 3540 , -
12 4049 -
group 4049 5064 50 .
. 5064 - Breast Imaging Committee American College of Ra-
, - diology
4049 - group 4049, -
5 6 . -
5064 (40%), 5059 -
4049 (1520%) , -
. HIP -
, -
50 - 39.
, 9
-
VI. 387

4.

Follow up

(1963-1969) 4064 2 12 30.131 18 23%


Malmo (1976-1986) 4569 12 1824 20.695 12 29%
Kopparberg (1977-1983) 4074 1 24 38.562 13 32%
Ostergottland (1977-1983) 4074 1 24 38.405 13 22%
Edinburgh (1979-1988) 4564 12 24 23.226 10 26%
Stockholm (1981-1985) 4064 1 28 38.525 8 20%
Gothenberg (1983-1988) 4059 2 18 20.724 7 14%
Canada 1 (1980-1987) 4049 2 12 25.216 7
Canada 2 (1980-1987) 5059 2 12 19.711 7 3%

1963 (. 4), 5 - 1. O
.
group - 2. ,
22% (Edinburgh) 29% .
(Malmo) 2 - 3. -
( ). O - .
, 4. O -

, - .
( 26% - 5. < 15 mm -
control group ), ,
- .
6.
. 50 -

-
-
.

7. , -
-
-
, -
. -
,
: ,
.
1. O
2.
,
, ; ;
, 5
,
( ) -
group - 4049, -
, 7079 . -
1432%. -
. 40 .
O L. Tabar 1999 (
Two-county study 70, 75 ), -

40 : -
388 OY

68%
5. -
(1995) ...*
85%. -
4049

2029 600 0,3%
group 4049
3039 8.400 4,6% -
4049 33.800 18,6% .
5059 28.300 15,6%
6069 41.300 22,7% 4.
7079 44.100 24,3% ;
80+ 25.300 13,9%
-
182.000 , -
* : American Cancer Society SEER program incidence rates

, .
Harvard 199942 J.
. - Michaelson D. Kopans, -
75 -
, - -
,
o - 50 -
. 80 , 5070 157
70 188 . -
3. 40-49 -
5070
; , -
1
- ( ,
5059. - , ).
T
Nijmegen O43, -
group 5069. 25%
( 1/5 ),
group ,
. 18% -
, - . ,
- , -
- -
.
-
, , -

- -
, 4049 .
- -
, -
5069, - ,
-
(1014 ). 183.134 , -
41 - 4075.
54% 40 , -
77% 4049 , 78% 5064 -
81% 64 . :
VI. 389

) T .
( -
, , ( -
, - ) (
).
) ( - ,
, ). ). -
) . , -
( 1 .
2 ). -
-
. - , -
-
- CAD.
(18 24
). -
) T , 74 . -
-
. ,
, ( )
(, . -
, , , - ,
).
, -
-
.
:
2000 2001 -
1. 41.000 -
Lancet 44,45
.
, (meta-
2.
analysis)
70%.
,
3.
,
10% -
. -
.
-
4. 1,5% -
-
.
30%, -
5. -
in situ -
0,55%.
, -
6. >0,30,
, -
4049 , .
> 0,50 50 . O -
7. 25% -
in situ . ,
8. < 15%, , -
2 . -
- -

.
40 , - -
,
, -
- ,
390 OY

. ,
, ( 350 ),
, 30% -
,
( 4 ).


(.. 1.500.000 ) - , -
-
(1.500.000 ) - ,
, - -
. ,
1.500.000 - 6,6 -
, - , rad,
10 -
. - 47,48.
( , NCI (National Cancer Institute)
) 7,5
, rad, -
, - 35 3,5
, 35 .
, 50%
1 2.000.000
,
. O -
( )
200

, 30 , -
(U/S, MRI),
60
,
49.
.
O

H O O OOI
OI

30 .
2530 -
50.
25 -
46. . O -
, -
0,1 -
rad, , ,
. -
, .
- -
-
. , 815% -
, - -
. - .


1. American Association of Physicists in Medicine 1990. Equip- CB. Anthropomorphic radiologic phantoms. Radiology 1986;
ment requirements and quality control for mammography. 158: 550-552.
2. Yaffe MJ, Johns PC, Nishikawa RM, Mawdsley GE, Caldwell 3. Moores BM, Henshaw ET, Watkinson SA, Pearcey BJ. Practi-
VI. 391

cal guide to quality assurance in medical imaging. Chichester: stic radiology: an Anglo-American textbook of imaging. Edin-
Wiley, 1987. burgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1986: 1631-1668.
4. Eklund GW, Gardenosa G. The art of mammographic positio- 24. Sadowsky N, Kopans DB. Breast cancer. Radiologic Clinics of
ning. Radiol Clin North Amer 1992; 30: 21-53. North America 1983; 21(1): 51-65.
5. Azzopardi JG. Problems in breast pathology. London, Eng- 25. Rosen PR. The pathology of breast carcinoma. In: Harris JR,
land: Saunders, 1979. Henderson JC, Hellman S, Kinne DW, eds. Breast diseases.
6. Kopans DB, Swann CA, White G. Asymmetric breast tissue. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1987: ch. 7.
Radiology 1989; 171: 639-643. 26. Love SM, Schnitt SJ, Connoly JL, Shirley RL. Benign breast
7. White DR, Tucker AK. A test object for assessing image quali- disorders. In: Harris JR, Hellman S, Henderson IC, Kinne DW,
ty in mammography. British Journal of Radiology 1980; 53: eds. Breast diseases. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1987.
331-335. 27. Fajardo L, Davis J, Wiens J, Trego D. Mammography-guided
8. Cowen AR, Coleman NJ. Design of test objects and phantoms stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable
for quality control in Mammographic screening. In: Institute breast lesions: prospective comparison with surgical biopsy re-
of Physical Sciences in Medicine, Report 61. Physics in Dia- sults. AJR 1990; 181: 359-361.
gnostic Radiology. New York: 1990: 30-36. 28. Evans WP, Cade SH. Needle localization and fine-needle aspi-
9. Hendrick RE. Standardization of image quality and radiation ration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions with use of stan-
dose in mammography. Radiology 1990; 174: 648-654. dard and stereotactic equipment. Radiology 1989; 173: 53-56.
10. Kinne DW, Kopans DB. Physical examination and mammo- 29. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotactic core
graphy in the diagnosis of breast disease. In: Harris JR, Hen- biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion.
derson JC, Hellman S, Kinne DW, eds. Breast diseases. Penn- Radiology 1995; 194: 379-381.
sylvania: JB Lippincott, 1987: ch. 3. 30. Homer MJ. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions with
11. Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing the curved-end, retractable wire: leaving the needle in vivo
breast cancer. AJR 1976; 126: 1130-1139. AJR 1988; 151: 919-920.
12. Wolfe JN. Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with 31. Helvie MA, Ikeda DM, Adler DD. Localization and needle a-
age. Radiology 1976; 121: 545-552. spiration of breast lesions: complications in 370 cases. AJR
13. Urbanski S, Jensen WM, Cooke G, Mc Farlane D, Shannon P, 1991; 157: 711-714.
Kmikov V, Boyd NF. The association of histological and radio- 32. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging repeating and
logical indicators of breast cancer risk. BJC 1988; 58: 474-479. data system. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1993.
14. Sickles EA. Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid 33. Sickles EA. Periodic follow-up of probably benign mammogra-
breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size phic lesions: results of 3184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;
and age of patient. Radiology 1994; 192: 439-442. 179: 463-468.
15. Moskowitz M. Circumscribed lesions of the breast. In: Ms- 34. Sullivan DC. Needle core biopsy of mammographic lesions.
kowitz M, ed. Syllabus: a diagnostic categorical course in breast AJR 1994; 162: 601-608.
imaging. Oak Brook, III: Radiologic Society of North America 35. Shapiro S. Screening: assessment of current studies. Cancer
1983; 31-33. 1994; 74: 231-238.
16. Mitnick JS, Roses DF, Harris J, Feiner HD. Circumscribed in- 36. Kopans DB, Feig SA. The Canadian National Breast Screen-
traductal carcinoma of the breast. Radiology 1989; 170: 423- ing Study: a critical review. AJR 1993; 161: 755-760.
425. 37. Muir BB, Kirkpatrick A, Roberts MM, Duffy SW. Oblique-
17. Leborgne R. Diagnosis of tumors of the breast by simple ro- view mammography: adequacy for screening. Radiology 1984;
entgenography: calcifications in carcinoma. AJR 1951; 65: 1- 151: 39-41.
11. 38. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, McGivney W, Hendee W. The value
18. Feig SA, Galkin BM, Muir HD. Evaluation of breast microcal- of mammography screening in women under 50 years. JAMA
cifications by means of optically magnified tissue specimen ra- 1988; 259: 1512-1519.
diographs. Recent Results in Cancer Research 1987; 105: 111- 39. Moskowitz M. Breast cancer: age-specific growth rates and
124. screening strategies. Radiology 1986; 161: 37-41.
19. Feig SA, Shaber GS, Patchefsky A. Analysis of clinically occult 40. Tabar L, et al. The natural history of Breast carcinoma. What
and mammographically occult breast tumors. AJR 1977; 128: have we learned from screening? Cancer 1999; 86: 449-62.
403-408. 41. Rosenberg RD, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity
20. Wolfe JN. Analysis of 462 breast carcinomas. AJR 1974; 121: and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammogra-
846-853. phy sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183.134
21. Wingo PA, Tong T, Bolden S. Cancer statistics, 1995. CA screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radio-
1995; 45: 8-30. logy 1998, Nov; 209(2): 511-8.
22. Gravelle H. Mammography. In: Sutton D, ed. A textbook of 42. Michaelson J, et al. Breast cancer: Computer Simulation Me-
radiology and imaging. Edinburg: Churchill-Livingstone, 1980: thod for estimating optimal intervals for screening. Radiology
1396-1410. 1999; 212: 551-560.
23. Feig SA. The breast. In: Grainger R, Allison D, eds. Diagno- 43. Van Gils CH, et al. High mammographic breast density and its
392 OY

implications for the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Group of the Swedish National Board of health and Welfare.
Screen 1999; 6(4): 200-4. Lancet 1985; 1: 829-832.
44. Olsen O, et al. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer 48. Tabar L, Farenberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE. The Swedish two-
with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358: 1340-42. county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: re-
45. Gotzsche P, et al. Is screening for breast with mammography cent results and calculation of benefit. J Epidemiol Commu-
justifiable? Lancet 2000; 355: 129-34. nity Health 1989; 43: 107-114.
46. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic screening for 49. Dodd G. American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for
breast cancer: the health insurance plan project and its seque- breast cancer: an overview. Cancer 1992; 42: 177-180.
lae, 1963-1986. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins Press, 1988. 50. Hurley SF, Kaldor JM. The benefits and risks of mammogra-
47. Tabar L, Farenberg CJG, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality phic screening for breast cancer. Epidemiologic Reviews 1992;
from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: 14: 101-130.
randomized trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working

(...)
. , . , . , .

O (...)
. -
700.000 - ,
1. ,
- 15% 4.
2. - -
,
300.000 : , . -
. - -
-
. 5.
O - -
: -
- , -
, . - .
, - , -
, ,
, ,
.
, -
-
. -
- (screening).
: ) -
- -
. -
6 ml 3. -
- )
-
. - -
, () -
.
.
OOH I IO O-
- (FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TEST F.O.B.T.)
. - E E OH OOI -
- EO OA
, - O
- - ..., ,
. E

393
394 OY

(). - , 98%10.
(positive predictive
(Hemoccult test, Hemoccult II, Hemoccult value) ... (5,6%
Sensa), 2,2%
(Hemo Quant), Mandel et al)
(He- 11.
me Select), 46.500 50
-
. ...
Hemo Quant Hemoccult , ,
...
, - 12.
- -
. Hemo Quant - -
,
. - ...
6. -
Hemo Quant -
Hemoccult II, 13.
... O Y (WHO)
..., - 50 -
(26%)7. .
Hemoccult Heme Se-
lect -
..., Heme Se- 4050%14.
lect (94% 58%), , -
F.O.B.T. ...
8. -
, - .
, Hemoccult II, Hemoccult Sensa, Heme Select , 13
Hemo Quant, ... 62.000 , Jorgensen et
- al F.O.B.T.
, Heme Select Hemoccult Sensa - 30% -
... - - 15. , -
- -
... - Minnesota ... Nottingham
90%, - , -
- Hemoccult II9. F.O.B.T.
, , - ...11,16.
C - Minnesota
, , -
, 33%,
, - 6%11.
,
-
, - 1518%
15,16.
. - ,
-
-
, ,
VI. 395

12% 17. 15 -
- K-ras, APC
- p53 , BAT 26
- DNA.
... - -
, (28
- , 11
. - 22 ...),
91%
, 82% , -
- 93%.

( - DNA -
). . -
, -
, - ,
. - , , -
.
, - -

... TP53, 26, -ras 26, 26 -
18,19. 27 APC28,
- .

- OOO EO (Y OO-
RT-PCR - OOO OONOO)
20. 70 Gilbertsen
O DNA - Nelms
- ... 29 (. 1).
21. DNA - 1980
-
50
22. 1995 -
DNA ... 30,31.
... -
23,24.
K-ras , , -
50% -
.

DNA,
, K-ras
-
.
-


, -
DNA25. -
DNA 1. -
, - .
396 OY

1990 -
-
- 50% , -
... .
-
. , -
-
Y OOOOO , -
O Selby et al Newcomb et al .
O Lemmel et al 23%
..., , ...
- -
36. -
...32,33.
5 . - ...
, -
- ... -
70%.
45% ... -
(
(. > 1 cm )
2). . -
-
- 37,38.
15%
...
- . -
,
. - 50% 39,40,41.
-
. -
- 50%. 30%
-
34,35. . -
1/3

.
50% 5070 -
.
5% ... -
. ,
,
.
-
-
40%
. O -


2. - .
. -
VI. 397


.
-
-
.
-
-
,
.
40-47.
-



. 4. .
(> 1 cm) -
... -
48,49 (. 3). -
818% 48,49. 50,54. -
- ... -
(5% 50 ), ... -

... (. 4). O , -
3,23,6 50,51. -
38.
-
(< 1 cm). , E-
. 35 ,
- 55. -
- -
, -
48,49,52,53. 3
32% 42% ... 3,3%38.
-
. - OONOO

. ...

( ,
...). -
-

, ... -
55 55.
-
-
, -
... -
11.
3. -
.
398 OY

55 , - ,
... ..., -

OO O OY O- -
OY OOOY EO ,
- -
, , -
: . -
10, 55 - -,
, (- ...,
- 58,59.
, O Frazier et al -
- 1, -
- , ,
), - ... (1998),
- ...
... .
56.
O Eddy et al - H E O OOY
- -

. - ,
-- .
, -
,
. , -
-
, -- 60.

57. ,
F.O.B.T. ... 5$61.

1. - ...

- -

(1998, $ ) () (1998, $ ) ... (%) ... (%)

1.052 17.3481
Sig1 55 1.070 17.3632 1.200 14 16
Sig2 55 1.095 17.3654 11.000 15 19
.... 55 1.200 17.3585 8 11
Sig1 10 1.218 17.3732 15.800 28 32
Sig2 10 1.288 17.3775 16.100 32 38
55 1.312 17.3760 27 31
Sig1 5 1.438 17.3806 37 40
.... Sig2 10 1.810 17.4022 21.200 55 70
10 2.028 17.3959 58 64
.... Sig2 5 2.034 17.4066 51.200 61 75

Sig1:
Sig2:
....:
VI. 399


2. O ...
,
1. -
. , -
2. O , -
Turcot Gardner

3. ... -
4. -
Peutz-Jeghers

5. O ( ):
.
... 70
A O EO
6. : O (FAP)

,
FAP PC (adenoma-
tous polyposis coli) . -
, APC -
, FAP. O -
... APC
2. FAP, -
- (
- 10
, ), -
, - FAP 20 -

- 10 -
FAP.
.

KOOOYO IO EO O
EO O EO FAP ,
- , -
- , -
(FAP: Familial adenoma- . O -
tous polyposis) - -
(HNPCC: Hereditary -
nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), - , -
.
, -
. ,
: -
-
. - -
- , .
- FAP -
, - ,
,
, -
, . -
. ,
400 OY

ENEIEI:
- FAP
( 100 . )
-
FAP
- 20
. ( FAP)
- APC
AFAP (
FAP/AFAP)
APC
(
FAP/AFAP)
APC
(
ENETIKH KAOHHH: K - APC
FAP/AFAP)
- E

- E / E

- E
APC
-
( )
-

K



APC
( ,
K

APC )
M/ M
PC
( FAP/AFAP)
APC





APC
( E 5.
FAP/AFAP) FAP.

- MSI, ,
(. 5). . -
HNPCC -
-- Amster-
(Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal
dam, ,
cancer HNPCC)
-
Bethesda -
HNPCC .
DNA -
(hMLH1, hMSH2, hPMS1, hPMS2, hMSH6).
(MSI, Microsatellite instabi- O
lity) DNA - NPCC , -
( - , -
) - ,
- .
. hMSH2 hMLH1, o SI
HNPCC, Bethesda, -
VI.


(
HNPCC )
(
HNPCC )

(
MSI HNPCC)

MS MSH2 / MLH1


MSI
MSS ( )
-


MSH2/MLH1 ( )

ENEIEI: ENETIKH KAOHHH:


- -
Amsterdam
- - /
Bethesda- - ( HNPCC )
-
-
( ,
)
MSH2 / MLH1


( )
(
HNPCC )



( PCC)

6. HNPCC .
401
402 OY

, < 40 )
HNPCC.
SI DNA < 50
, -
(CSGE) , <50
(SSCP) -
hMSH2 hMLH1 . - , < 50
( < 40 .
hMSH2 hMLH1) -
. , -
, - -
- , -
- 62, ,
. 63.
, -
- ... , -
, FAP. 64.
MSI -
(N/SS) - -
, , ,
- ... -
. SI - 65 -
/ 23 66.
3 -
Bethesda, - 2 ,
. Crohn
, - (. 7).
, - -

. -
, E A.
8 12-15

(. 6).
E 1-2
H O AMSTERDAM B 10-12 cm

3 ,
E

2 E X Y
1 ,

50 .
E K
H A BETHESDA-OOOE 1-2 3-6

Amsterdam
X +
2 HNPCC ( X
/ ) E


/ K

HNPCC / 7. O O (WHO)
( < 50 , .
VI. 403

5%
... 10 20
67. - 69. -
68.
, 5 .


1. Parkin DM, Pisoni P, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of the worldwi- domised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for
de incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996; 348: 1472-1477.
1993; 55: 594-606. 17. Autier P, Boyle P, Buyse M, et al. Is FOB screening really the
2. Garfinkel L, Mushinski MUS. Cancer incidence, mortality and answer for lowering mortality in colorectal cancer. Recent Re-
survival: 1973-1996. Stat Bull 1999; 80: 23-32. sults. Cancer Res 2003; 16: 254-263.
3. ercal FA, Saint John DJB. Relationship between patients of 18. Ahlquist DA, Harrington JJ, Burgart LJ, et al. Morphometric
bleeding and Hemoccult sensitivity in patients with colorectal analysis of the molecular layer overlying exfoliated stool
cancers and adenomas. Gastroenterology 1982; 82: 891. screening markers. Hum Pathol 2000; 31: 51-57.
4. Silverman AI, Desai TK, Dhar R, et al. Clinical features, eva- 19. Loktionov A, ONeill IK, Sylvester KR, et al. Quantitation of
luation and detection of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin DNA from exfoliated colonocytes isolated from human stool
N Am 1988; 17: 713-725. surface as a novel non-invasive screening test for colorectal
5. Bentler B, Cerami A. Cachectin: More than a tumor necrosis cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4: 337-342.
factor. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 379. 20. Chung KY, Mullick T, Motevalli S, et al. Evaluation of sensiti-
6. St John DJ, Young GP, McHutchison JG, et al. Comparison vity and specificity of CD44 expression in fecal colonocytes as
of the specificity and sensitivity of Hemoccult and Hemo- a non-invasive marker for detecting colonic polyps and cancer.
Quand in screening for colorectal neoplasia. Ann Int Med Gastroenterology 1998; 114: A580.
1992; 117; 376. 21. Boland CR, Sato J, Saito K, et al. Genetic instability and chro-
7. Ahlquist DA, Wieand HS, Moertel CG, et al. Accuracy of fe- mosomal aberrations in colorectal cancer: a review of current
cal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospe- models. Cancer Detect Prev 1998; 22: 377-382.
ctive study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests. JAMA 22. Poiner HN, Hofreiter M, Spaulding WG, et al. Molecular co-
1993; 269: 1262-1267. proscopy: dung and diet of the extinct ground sloth. Nothe-
8. Thomas WM, Hardcastle JD, Jackson J, et al. Chemical and riops shastensis. Science 1998; 281: 402-406.
immunological testing for fecal occult blood. A comparison of 23. Puig P, Urgell E, Capella G, et al. A highly sensitive method
two tests in symptomatic patients. Br J Cancer 1992; 65: 618- for K-ras mutation detection is useful in diagnosis of gastroin-
620. testinal cancer. Int J Cancer 2000; 85: 73-77.
9. St John DJB, Young GP, Alexeyeff MA, et al. Evaluation of 24. Villa E, Dugani A, Rebecchi AM, et al. Identification of sub-
new occult blood tests for detection of colorectal neoplasia. jects at risk for colorectal carcinoma through a test based on
Gastroenterology 1993; 104: 1661-1668. K-ras determination in stool. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:
10. Allison JE, Feldman R, Tekawa IS. Hemoccult screening in 1346-1353.
detecting colorectal neoplasm: sensitivity, specificity and pre- 25. Ahlquist DA, Skoletsky JE, Boynton KA, et al. Colorectal can-
dictive value long-term follow-up in a large group practice set- cer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool:
ting. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 328-333. feasibility of a multitarget assay system. Gastroenterology 2000;
11. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality 119: 1219-1227.
from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N 26. Dong SM, Traverso G, Johnson C, et al. Detecting colorectal
Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1365-1371. cancer in stool with the use of multiple genetic targets. J Natl
12. Jensen BM, Kronborg O, Fenger C. Interval cancers in screen- Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 858-865.
ing with fecal blood test for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastro- 27. Traverso G, Shuber A, Olsson L, et al. Detection of proximal
enterol 1992; 27: 779-782. colorectal cancers through analysis of faecal DNA. Lancet
13. Simo JB. Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: A 2002; 359: 403-404.
critical review. Gastroenterolgoy 1985; 88: 820-837. 28. Traverso G, Shuber A, Levin B, et al. Detection of APC muta-
14. Winawer SJ, John DJSL, Bond JH, et al. Prevention of colore- tions in fecal DNA from patients with colorectal tumors. N
ctal cancer guidelines based on new data. Bulletin of WHO Engl J Med 2002; 346: 311-320.
1995; 73: 7-10. 29. Gilbertsen VA, Nelms JM. The prevention of invasive cancer
15. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized study of of the rectum. Cancer 1978; 41: 1137-1139.
screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood test- 30. Eddy D. ACS report on the cancer-related health check-up.
ing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds. Cancer 1980; 30: 193-240.
Gut 2002; 50: 29-32. 31. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Report of the US Pre-
16. Hardcastgle JD, Chamberlain JD, Robinson MHE, et al. Ran- ventive Services Task Force. 2nd ed. Washington DC: Depart-
404 OY

ment of Health and Human Services, 1995. 50. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cusick J. Long term risk or colorectal
32. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, et al. A case control cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med
study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colore- 1992; 326: 658-622.
ctal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 653-657. 51. Lofti AM, Spencer RJ, Ilstrup DM, et al. Colorectal polyps
33. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, et al. Screening sigmo- and the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1986;
idoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 61: 337-343.
1992; 84: 1572-1575. 52. Ryan ME, Norfleet RG, Kirchner JP, et al. The significance of
34. Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Northover JMA, et al. Prevention of colo- diminutive colonic polyps found at flexible signoidoscopy. Ga-
rectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy. Lancet 1993; 341: strointest Endosc 1989; 35: 85-89.
736-740. 53. Tripp MR, Morgan TR, Sampliner RE, et al. Synchronous
35. Grandqvist S. Distribution of polyps in the large bowel in rela- neoplasms in patients with diminutive colorectal adenomas.
tion to age. Scand J Gastroenterol 1981; 16: 1025-1031. Cancer 1987; 60: 1599-1603.
36. Lemmel GT, Haseman JH, Rex DK, et al. Neoplasia distal to 54. Spencer RJ, Melton LJ, Ready RL, et al. Treatment of small
the splenic flexure in persons with proximal colon cancer. Ga- colorectal polyps: A population-based study of the risk of sub-
strointest Endosc 1996; 44: 109-111. sequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 305-310.
37. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by 55. Levin B, Murphy GP. Revision in the American Cancer Socie-
flexible sigmoidoscopy and polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 1995; ty recommendations for the early detection or colorectal can-
123: 904-910. cer. Cancer 1992; 42: 296-299.
38. Winawer BJ, Zauber AG, Ho NH, et al. Prevention of colore- 56. Lieberman D. Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screen-
ctal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; ing. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 1781-1790.
329: 1977-1981. 57. Eddy DM. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med
39. Foutch PG, Mai H, Pardy K, et al. Sigmoidoscopy may be inef- 1990; 113: 373-384.
fective for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in asymp- 58. Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of
tomatic, average-risk men. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36: 924-928. screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA
40. Lieberman D, Smith F. Screening for colon malignancy with 2000; 284: 1954-1961.
colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 946-951. 59. Inadomi JM, Sonnenberg A. An evidence-based medicine ap-
41. Rex D, Smith JJ, Ulbright TM, et al. Distal colonic hyperpla- proach to economic studies: Assessing the cost-effectiveness of
stic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas in asymptomatic competing strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Ga-
average-risk subjects. Gastroenterology 1992; 102: 317-319. stroent Hepatol 2003; 1: 404-413.
42. Achkar E, Carey W. Small polyps found during fiberoptic sig- 60. Luk GD. Colorectal cancer. Gastroenteral Clin N Am 1988;
moidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Ann Intern Med 1988; 17: 655-656.
109: 880-883. 61. Luk GD. Cancer Surveillance Strategies. In: Sleisenger, Ford-
43. Ansher AF, Lewis JH, Fleischer DE, et al. Hyperplastic colo- tran, eds. Gastrointestinal Disease. 5th ed. Philadephia: Saun-
nic polyps as a marker for adenomatous colonic polyps. Am J ders, 1993: 115-126.
Gastroenterol 1989; 84: 113-117. 62. Bussey HJR. Familial polyposis coli. Familian studies, histopa-
44. Blue MG, Sivak MV, Achkar E, et al. Hyperplastic polyps seen thology, differential diagnosis and results of treatment. Balti-
at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at more: John Hopkins University Press, 1975.
colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 564-566. 63. Lynch HT, Lynch PM, Albano WA, et al. The cancer family
45. Brady PG, Straker RJ, McClare SA, et al. Are hyperplastic re- syndrome: A status report. Dis Colon Rectum 1981; 24: 311.
ctosigmoid polyps associated with an increased risk or proxi- 64. Rozen P, Fireman Z, Ron E, et al. Family history of colorectal
mal colonic neoplasms? Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 481- cancer as a marker of potential malignancy within a screening
485. program. Gastroenterology 1986; 90: 1068 (Abstr).
46. Foutch PG, DiSario JA, Pardy K, et al. The sentinel hyperpla- 65. Stryker S, Wolff BG, Culp CE, et al. Natural history of un-
stic polyp: A marker for synchronous neoplasia in the proximal treated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 1009.
colon. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 1482-1485. 66. Williams CB. Polyp follow-up: How, who and how often? Br J
47. Provenzale D, Garrett J, Condon S, et al. Risk for colon ade- Surg 1985; 72: 25.
nomas in patients with rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps. Ann 67. OConner TW, Rombeau JL, Levine HS, et al. Late develop-
Intern Med 1990; 13: 760-763. ment of colorectal cancer subsequent to pelvic irradiation. Dis
48. Grossman S, Milos ML, Tekawa IS, et al. Colonoscopic Colon Rectum 1979; 22: 123.
screening of persons with suspected risk factors for colon can- 68. Sandler RS, Sandler DP. Radiation-induced cancer of the co-
cer: II. Past history of colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology lon and rectum: Assessing the risk. Gastroenterology 1983; 84:
1989; 96: 299-306. 51.
49. Zarchy TM, Ershoff D. Do characteristics of adenomas on fle- 69. Starling JR, Vehling DT, Gilchrist KW. Value of colonoscopy
xible sigmoidoscopy predict advanced lesions on baseline colo- after urefero-sigmoidoscopy. Surgery 1984; 96: 84.
noscopy? Gastroenterology 1994; 106: 1501-1504.

PSA
.

O O O EO -
- A
, -
.
. - O (screening) -
, , ,
, , -
-
. . O ,
- -
, . -
-
. - .

. - -
, . , -
-
. -

-
. . -
, -
30% -
PSA ,


3 , 30%
. -

, -
1. ,

, -
4.
10 2.
, - OO I O OO O OY
, 40% - OY EO;
. O (screening) -
10% , -

-
. , -
1/3 - .
screening, -
3. -

405
406 OY

, , , ...7.
. 66%
- , -
. , 19%
O 8.
-

- . -
.
4 -
: 5
1. ( - 11 -
- 9.
). .
2. (
- OO O O
, - O O
, - ,
-
).
3. - -
( - .
-
, - ,
, ). , ,
4. - , ,
. . , -
,
O O TOY OO O .
O O O O -
-
, .
.
E , / ,
, , - , , -
. O
. . -
, PSA -
- (TRUS), -
. , .
-
H E O OA
5. O . -
... 810%, , -
3%6. . -
- -
, , -
2%10.
. , 11,
, -
- , 12,
VI. 407

O OO OO (PSA)
. - To PSA 33 Kda, -
,
.
13. PSA ,
3045% , .
2231%.
. PSA -
21,22.
. - PSA , -
. ,
- , -
5070% - PSA
14, - -
, .
, - , TRUS, -
, , , -
..23.
15,16. PSA 10 80 -
- , -
- .
PSA (< 3 ng/ml)17. 1990
-
OO OA (TRUS)
- PSA. -
TRUS, PSA, - -
- 40%24.
. 70% -
, 30% -
-
25.
. -
1,82,6% ,
TRUS 1,31,4% 18. PSA
, - PSA, ,
, 60% , .
, 25% 20% -
, - PSA, 2 3
0,5 cc 25% - PSA . ,
19. 4,0 ng/ml, 80%,
T 5972%
. O - 33%. -
PSA
, - 2,9%26.
, -
20. -
- TRUS
3,64,5%27.
Doppler . -
- 14,5%28.
31.953 ,
. 5093 , PSA
408 OY

( 4,0 ng/ml). 3,6% PSA 34 ng/ml (Glea-


PSA, 3,0% 4,7% - son score >7, Gleason 45),
. PSA > 4 ng/ml . ,
31,6% 25,5%. PSA - PSA < 4,0 ng/ml
- -
29. 34.

PSA; -
5575 PSA -
4,0 ng/ml - (1c)
1/3 O 1c ( /TRUS,
30. PSA) .
H PSA - O Scardino et al -
. -
PSA 1.002 - -
4580 , Labrie et al 37.
3,0 ng/ml. H O Partin et al 60%
PSA 81% 85% 1c -
31. ,
O Lodding et al 1c -
30%, - 38.
PSA 4,0 ng/ml 3,0 , -
ng/ml. - -

32. .
ERSPC Rotterdam PSA, :
PSA < 1 ng/ml - PSA, PSA, -
2,2% (.. 50 -
, , PSA.
-
)33. PSA (PSA Density)
PSA < 1 ng/ml ( PSA
37% 5575 ). 4,010,0 ng/ml -
PSA 33,9% ng/ml (benign prostatic hypertrophy BPH) -
12%
4,7 , PSA39.
PSA34. - , -
ERSCP PSA ( PSA -
,
PSA > 3 ng/ml35. ). PSA
-
- 4,010,0 ng/ml.
PSA PSAD 0,15
H - , 40.
PSA <4 ng/ml . O Noldus
et al 9% 41.
( <0,5 ml) - O Ohori et al
, PSAD, PSA > 10,0
PSA < 4,0 ng/ml36. ng/ml,
O Schroder et al 42.
--
VI. 409

PSA .
, -

43. , -
- . O
PSA .
- PSA 4,0 ng/ml 50.
PSA . O Bassler et al
PSA 4,010,0 ng/ml, - 6069 .
PSA ,
, 4,5
30 cc44. ng/ml51.
-
PSA (PSA Velocity)
PSA, 4,0 ng/ml ,
To PSAV PSA
, .
. 3
2 - PSA (f/t PSA)
1218 . - To PSA
0,75 ng/ml/ - (1-, 2--
45. ) . -
PSAV - PSA
PSA. - . f/t,
0,75 ng/ml/ -
(< 70 ) . f/t PSA -
PSA < 4,0 ng/ml. > 70
PSA 0,75 . , -
PSA > 4,0 ng/ml - PSA52,53.
(> 0,4 ng/ml/)46.
/ PSA PSA
- 4,010,0 ng/ml .
- f/t PSA < 0,20
PSA. 44%
, 19% -
( ) . -
- , 35%
, 12% -
, - . PSA 4,010,0 ng/ml f/t PSA -
PSA (.. 2,5, -
3,5, 4,5, 6,5 ng/ml 4, 5, 6 54.
7 )47. -
, PSA
40% . PSA,
48. -
60% 229 1.709 -
5 .
- PSA
49. 9,1% 18,9% -
O Crawford et al . fPSA ,
PSA PSA.
4,0 ng/ml fPSA 15% PSA 4,09,9 ng/ml,
410 OY

85,4%, 32,1% . O -
39,2%, 21,2%, PSA 510 .
14,6% .
fPSA 20%, 96,9%, -
12,3% 36,2%. O . -
12,7%, , -
3,1% 55.
O Tornblom et al .
PSA PSA < 3 ng/ -
ml. fPSA 18% - -
56.
- . -
/ PSA -
57, in vitro - (.. , )
PSA - .
58.
f/t PSA -
. -
59. -
- , -
.
, - -
; .
; PSA -
; , 15 -
; 60. -

, f/t PSA
,
410 ng/ml. .
-
EXEI AOTEEMA O HYMIAKO EE-
XO TH BETIH TH KINIKH EKBAH; -
- , O -
PSA , 695 1 2 .
, - 6,2
,
- ,
, - 61.
. O -
OI OO
, O OY OY EO
(lead H -
time bias), (length time ... 199162. -
bias) . 2,1%,
9,7% 1991199663.
, -
- 19911996 9,6%,
. - Quebec
, 23% 1991199764. -
PSA ,
VI. 411

H PLCO screening
75 . , -
- -
PSA 73.
,
65. - PSA. -
-
. -
PSA . CA-125 -
.
PSA. 148.000
5574 10
... 5
66,67, , 13 . -
, .. 90%,
68. 20% .
- .

, Quebec O O O O
. 46.193 45 O O
80 . -
PSA 3 ng/ml .
. 8 - . -
67% , -
69.
- . PSA
, 22,1% - 2
, 26.
70. ,
-
, -
6%71. .

- . O
..., -
. (-).
- -
(ERSPC) - .
1994 -
. , -
: , , , , , .
O.
160.000 5074 17 -
260.000. -

, . -
PSA, , - , -
4 . O -
ERSPC .
1/3 50 -
20%72. 2/3 70 -
412 OY

74.
O - , -
. , ,
- ..
- , ,
. , -
, ,
, , -
.
- -
- -
. ,
-
79,80.
75.
- , ,
- .
. - -
ERSPC Rotterdam. - , -
,

14,6 -

2,3 76. -
I O IO O O
,
OA OY OY , .
EO A OI; O
5069 PSA -

3.5004.500

H..A. .
. , -

, -
20.00050.000 , 33.000
77.
29.000113.000 .
PSA -
-
-

,
, 81.
, -
, - -
PSA78. . -
, < 0,5 cc . -
11% PSA -
6%
.
82.
OO N POPAM-
MATN O O O O O -
O O

. O - O O HYMIAKOY EEXOY
, -
-
VI. 413

PSA. - , 70
, , 75 ,
- PSA , -
, -
. - .
- 65
PSA PSA (< 0,5 ng/ml
< 2 ng/ml83. < 1 ng/ml) -
-
I E KOY HYMIAKOY
EEXOY (SCREENING) ,
O A A E PSA85.
PSA 50 -
. - ,
- 75 ,
( 45 ). O PSA 75 .

50 O OE HYMIAKOY
- EEXOY
. - -
- , ERSPC , -
. , ,
- -
, ..., -
,
.
4080 . 2005 -
, PSA 4 ng/ml 2008. -
50 ,
PSA 40 -
, PSA ,
- .
. PSA 3
ng/ml 2,5 ng/ml - , -
, - -
- -
84. .
American Urological Association American
O I E A O - Cancer Society 1992 -
O EO; PSA
> 50
PSA, (-, )
> 40 86. O
10 ,

, -
,
.
. O
- 2001, ,
. PSA < 1 ng/ml, -
414 OY

87. -
American Medical Association, Ameri- -
can College of Physicians American Task Force for .
Preventive Disease

88-90. H
E .
- -
- - -
-
. O . -
- PSA
-
-
91.
, .
- E -
,
. - , -
92. -
. - .
, - -
, , - , -
, - PSA .
. PSA (< 1,0
< 2,0 ng/ml) -
93. , -
-
. - .
- -
, ,

- . -
9% - ,
15 -
94,95. -
, . O
. -
-- . ,
96. -
PSA - .


1. Austenfiield MS, Davis BE. New concepts in the treatment of sults. J Urol 1989; 141: 82-84.
stage D1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urol Clin North Am 4. The Royal College of Radiologist Clinical Oncology Informa-
1990; 17: 867-884. tion. British Association of Urological Surgeons-Guidelines
2. Mench HR, Garfinkel L, Dodd GD. Preliminary report of the on the management of prostate Cancer. BJU International
National Cancer Data Base. CA 1991; 41: 7-18. 1999; 84: 987-1014.
3. Lepor H, Kimball AW, Walsh PC. Cause-specific actuarial 5. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer
survival analysis: A useful method for reporting survival data statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 15-36.
in men with clinically localized prostatic cancer: Long term re- 6. Seidman H, Mushinski MH, Geib SK, et al. Probabilities of e-
VI. 415

ventually developing or dying of cancer-United States 1985. early detection of prostate cancer from the American Cancer
CA 1985; 35: 36-56. Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Cancer
7. Muir CS, Nectoux J, Staszewski J. The epidemiology of prosta- 1997; 80: 1814-1817.
te cancer. Geographical distribution and time trends. Acta On- 25. Smith DS, Catalona WJ, Herschman JD. Longitudinal screen-
col 1991; 30: 133. ing for prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen. JAMA
8. Morten RA. Radical differences in adenocarcinoma of the 1996; 276: 1309-15.
prostate in North American man. Urology 1994; 44: 637. 26. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of
9. Rodriguez C, Calle EE, Miracle-McMahill HL, et al. Family prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for pro-
history and the risk of fatal prostate cancer. Epidemiol 1997; 8: state cancer. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1156-61.
653-7. 27. Catalona WJ, Richie P, Ahmann FR, et al. Comparison of di-
10. Lee F, Littrup PJ, Top-Pedersen ST, et al. Prostate cancer: gital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in
comparison of trans-rectal US and digital rectal examination the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter
for screening. Radiology 1988; 168: 389-394. clinical trial of 6.630 men. J Urol 1994; 151: 1283-1290.
11. Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Interexaminer variability of digital re- 28. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL, et al. Prostate can-
ctal examination in detecting prostate cancer. Urology 1995; 45: cer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonogra-
70-4. phy, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J
12. Mc Neal JE. The prostate gland: morphology and pathobiolo- Urol 1990; 143: 1146-1154.
gy. Monogr Urol 1988; 9: 36. 29. Crawford ED, De Antoni EP, Etzioni R, et al. Serum prostate-
13. Mueller EJ, Crain TW, Thompson IM, et al. An evaluation of specific antigen and digital rectal examination for early dete-
serial digital rectal examination in screening for prostate can- ction of prostate cancer in a national community-based pro-
cer. J Urol 1988; 149: 124-45. gram. The Prostate Cancer Education Council. Urology 1996;
14. Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Kautsic K, et al. Screening digital 47: 863-9.
rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a population- 30. Kranse R, Beemsterboer PMM, Rietbergen JBW, et al. Predi-
based case-control study. Urology 1998; 52: 173-9. ctors for biopsy outcome in the European Randomized Study
15. Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Quesenberry CP Jr, et al. Case-con- of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam region). Prostate
trol study of screening for prostate cancer by digital rectal exa- 1996; 39: 316-22.
minations. Lancet 1991; 337: 1526-9. 31. Labrie F, Dupont A, Suburu R, et al. Serum prostate specific
16. Chodak GW, Keller P, Schoenber HW. Assessment of screen- antigen as pre-screening test for prostate cancer. J Urol 1992;
ing for prostate cancer using digital rectal examination. J Urol 147: 846-51.
1989; 141: 1136-8. 32. Lodding P, Aus G, Bergdahl S, et al. Characteristics of
17. Beemsterboer PMM, Kranse R, de Koning HJ, et al. Changing screening detected prostate cancer in men 50-60 years old with
role of 3 screening modalities in the European Randomized 3-4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1998; 159: 899-903.
study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam). Int J 33. Hoedemaeker RF, Rietbergen JB, Kranse R, et al. Compari-
Cancer (Pred Oncol) 1999; 84: 437-41. son of pathologic characteristics of T1c and non-T1c cancers
18. Mettlin C, Lee F, Drago J, Murphy CP, Investigators of the A- detected in a population-based screening study, the European
merican Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. World J
Project. The American Cancer Society national prostate can- Urol 1997; 15: 339-45.
cer detection project. Findings on the detection of early pro- 34. Schroder FH, van der Cruijsen-Koeter I, de Koning HJ, et al.
state cancer in 2.425 men. Cancer 1991; 67: 2949-2985. Prostate cancer detection at low prostate specific antigen. J
19. Littrup PJ, Bailey SE. Prostate cancer. The role of transrectal Urol 2000; 163: 806-12.
ultrasound and its impact on cancer detection and manage- 35. Schroder FH, Roobol-Bouts M, Vis AN, et al. Prostate-speci-
ment. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38: 87-113. fic antigen-based early detection of prostate cancer-validation
20. Rietbergen JBW, Boeken Kruger AE, et al. Complications of of screening without rectal examination. Urology 2001; 57: 83-
transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided systematic sextant biop- 90.
sies of the prostate. Evaluation of complication rates and risk 36. Noldus J, Stamey TA. Histological characteristics of radical
factors within a population based screening program. Urology prostatectomy specimens in men with a serum prostate specific
1997; 49: 875-80. antigen of 4 ng/ml or less. J Urol 1996; 155: 441-3.
21. Yu H, Diamandis EP. Measurement of prostate specific level 37. Scardino PT, Weaver R, Hudson MA. Early detection of pro-
in the serum of females and prostatectomized males with an state cancer. Hum Path 1992; 23: 211-22.
ultrasensitive immunoassay technique. J Urol 153:1004-8, 1995. 38. Partin AW, Kaltan MW, Subong ENP, et al. Combination of
22. Levesque MA, Yu H, DCosta M, Diamandis ER. Prostate prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to
specific antigen expression by various tumors. J Clin Lab Anal predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: a multi-
1995; 9: 123-6. institutional update. JAMA 1997; 277: 1445-51.
23. Nadler RB, Humphrey PA, Smith DS, et al. Effect of inflam- 39. Partin AW, Carter HB, Chan DW, et al. Prostate specific anti-
mation and benign prostatic hyperplasia on elevated serum gen in the staging of localized prostate cancer: influence of tu-
prostate-specific antigen levels. J Urol 1995; 154: 407-13. mor differentiation, tumor volume and benign hyperplasia. J
24. Mettlin C, Murphy G, Babian R, et al. Observations on the Urol 1990; 143: 747-52.
416 OY

40. Benson MC, Whang IS, Disson CA, et al. The use of prostate 56. Tornblom M, Norming U, Adolfsson J, et al. Diagnostic value
specific antigen density to enhance the predictive value of in- of percent free prostate-specific antigen: retrospective analysis
termediate levels of serum prostate specific antigen. J Urol of a population-based screening study with emphasis on men
1992; 147: 817-821. with PSA levels less than 3,0 ng/ml. Urology 1999; 53(5): 945-
41. Brawer MK, Aramburu EAG, Chen GL, et al. The inability of 50.
prostate specific antigen index to enhance the predictive value 57. Kingler HC, Woo H, Rosario D, et al. The value of prostate
of prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostatic carci- specific antigen (PSA) density and the free: total PSA ratio in
noma. J Urol 1993; 150: 369. selecting patients with a normal digital rectal examination and
42. Ohori M, Dunn JK, Scardino PT. Is prostate-specific antigen intermediate total PSA levels for further investigation. Br J
density more useful than prostate-specific antigen levels in the Urol 1998; 82(3): 393-7.
diagnosis of prostate cancer? Urology 1995; 46: 666-71. 58. Paus E, Nilsson O, Bormer OP, et al. Stability of free and total
43. Abdalla I, Ray P, Ray V, et al. Comparison of serum prostate- prostate specific antigen in serum from patients with prostate
specific antigen levels and PSA density in African-American, carcinoma and benign hyperplasia. J Urol 1998; 159(5): 1599-
white, and Hispanic men without prostate cancer. Urology 1998; 605.
51(2): 300-5. 59. Jung K, Meyer A, Lein M, et al. Ratio of free-to-total prostate
44. Djavan B, Zlotta Ar, Buttebler G, et al. Prostate specific anti- specific antigen in serum cannot distinguish patients with pro-
gen density of the transition zone for early detection of prosta- state cancer from those with chronic inflammation of the pro-
te cancer. J Urol 1998; 160(2): 411-8. state. J Urol 1998; 159(5): 1595-8.
45. Carter HB, Pearson JD, Metter J, et al. Longitudinal evalua- 60. Johansson JE, Holmberg L, Johansson S, et al. Fifteen-year
tion of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without survival in prostate cancer: A prospective, population-based
prostate disease. JAMA 1992; 267: 2215-20. study in Sweden. JAMA 1997; 277: 467-71.
46. Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Rate of change in serum prostate spe- 61. Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, et al. For the Scan-
cific antigen levels as a method for prostate cancer detection. J dinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4. A randomi-
Urol 1994; 152: 1163-7. zed trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchfull wait-
47. Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG, et al. Serum prostate- ing in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 781-9.
specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy 62. Stephenson RA. Population-based prostate cancer trends in
men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA the PSA era: Data from the Surveillance, epidemiology, and
1993; 270: 860-4. end Results (SEER) program. Monogr Urol 1998; 19: 3-19.
48. Morgan TO, Jacobsen SJ, McCarthy WF, et al. Age specific 63. Wingo PA, Ries LA, Giovino GA, et al. Annual report to the
reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen in black nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1996, with a special se-
men. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 304-10. ction on lung cancer and tobacco smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst
49. Borer JC, Sherman J, Solomon MC, et al. Age specific prosta- 1999; 91: 675-90.
te specific antigen reference ranges: population specific. J Urol 64. Meyer F, Moore L, Bairati J, Fradet Y. Downward trend in
1998; 159(2): 444-8. prostate cancer mortality in Quebec and Canada. J Urol 1999;
50. Crawford ED, Leewansangtong S, Coktas S, et al. Efficiency of 161: 1189-91.
prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in 65. Etzioni R, Legler JM, Feuer EJ, et al. Cancer surveillance se-
screening, using 4.0 ng/ml and age-specific reference range as ries: interpreting trends in prostate cancer-part III: Quantify-
a cutoff for abnormal values. Prostate 1999; 38: 296-302. ing the link between population prostate-specific antigen test-
51. Bassler TJ, Orozco R, Bassler IC, et al. Most prostate cancers ing and recent declines prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Can-
missed by raising the upper limit of normal prostate-specific cer Inst 1999; 91: 1033-9.
antigen for men in their sixties are clinically significant. Uro- 66. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics.
logy 1998; 52: 1064-9. CAJ 1999; 49: 8-31.
52. Stenman UH, Leinonen J, Alfthan H, et al. A complex between 67. Bartsch G, Horninger W, Klocker H, et al. Prostate cancer
prostate-specific antigen and a1-antichymotrypsin is the major mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass
form of prostate-specific antigen in serum of patients with pro- screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria. Urology 2001;
static cancer: assay of the complex improves clinical sensitivity 58: 417-24.
for cancer. Cancer Res 1991; 51: 222-6. 68. Oliver SE, Gunnell D, Donovan JL. Comparison of trends in
53. Alivizatos G, Deliveliotis C, Mitropoylos D, et al. Does free to prostate-cancer mortality in England and Wales and the USA.
total ratio of prostate-specific antigen alter the decision-mak- Lancet 2000; 355: 1788-9.
ing on prostatic biopsy. Urology 1996; 48(6A): 71-75. 69. Labrie F, Candas B, Dupont A, et al. Screening decreases pro-
54. Bangma CH, Rietbergen JBW, Kranse R, et al. The free-to- state cancer death. First analysis of the 1998 Quebec prospecti-
total prostate specific antigen improves the specificity of pro- ve randomized controlled trial. Prostate 1999; 38: 83-91.
state specific antigen in screening for prostate cancer in the 70. Alexander FE. Screening decreases prostatic cancer death.
general population. J Urol 1997; 157: 2191-6. First analysis of the 1998 Quebec prospective randomized con-
55. Mettlin C, Chesley AE, Murphy GP, et al. The association of trolled trial. Prostate 1999; 40: 135-6.
free PSA percent, total PSA, age, and gland volume in the de- 71. Boer R, Schroder FH. Quebec randomized controlled trial on
tection of prostate cancer. Prostate 1999; 39: 153-8. prostate cancer screening shows no evidence for mortality re-
VI. 417

duction (letter). Prostate 1999; 40: 130-4. ing strategies for prostate cancer: Computer simulations of age
72. Standaert B, Deniss L. The European Randomized Study of ranges, PSA cutoffs, and testing intervals. J Urol 1999; 161: 210.
Screening for Prostate Cancer: an update. Cancer 1997; 80: 85. Pearson JD, Landis P, Fozard JL, Carter HB. When is PSA
1830-4. testing no longer necessary? J Urol 1998; 159: 178.
73. Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Kramer BS, et al. The Prostate, 86. American Urological Society. Executive Committee Report.
Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial of the Baltimore: American Urological Association, 1992.
National Cancer Institute. Cancer 1995; 75: 1869-73. 87. Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender A, et al. American
74. Stemmeman GN, Normura AG, Choyou PH, Yatani R. A pro- Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: up-
spective comparison of prostate cancer at autopsy and as a cli- date of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal and
nical event: The Hawaii Japanese experience. Cancer Epide- endometrial cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 38-75.
miol Biomarkers Prevent 1992; 1: 189-93. 88. American Medical Association. AMA report 9 of the Council
75. Optenberg SA, Thoppson IM. Economics of screening for of Scientific Affairs. Screening and Early Detection of Prostate
carcinoma of the prostate. Urol Clin N Am 1990; 17: 719-737. Cancer. Report 2000; 9-a-00: 1-22.
76. Schroder FH, Wildhagen MF. he Rotterdam study Group of 89. Ferrini R, Woolf SH. Screening for prostate cancer in Ameri-
the European Randomized Study of screening for Prostate can men. American College of Preventive Medicine Practice
Cancer (ERSCP). Screening for prostate cancer: evidence and Policy Statement mm. American cancer Society Prostate Can-
perspectives. BJU International 2001; 88: 811-817. cer Screening Guideline Conference 2000 Update, Atlanta:
77. Terris MK, Mc Neal JE, Stamey TA. Detection of clinically May 4-6, 2000.
significant prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound-guided sy- 90. American College of Physicians. Clinical guidelines: Part III:
stematic biopsies. J Urol 1992; 148: 829. Screening for prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 480-
78. Oesterling JE, Suman VJ, Zincke H, Bostwick DG. PSA de- 4.
tected (clinical stage T1c or Bo) prostate cancer. Urol Clin N 91. Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention: Recommendations
Am 1993; 20: 687-693. on cancer screening in the European Union. Eur J Cancer 2000;
79. Barry MJ, Fleming C, Coley CM, et al. Should Medicare provi- 36: 1473-8.
de reimbursement for prostate-specific antigen testing for ear- 92. Chan ECY, Sulmasy DP. What should men know about pro-
ly detection of prostate cancer? Part IV: Estimating the risks state-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent?
and benefits of an early detection program. Urology 1995; 46: Am J Med 1998; 105: 266-74.
445. 93. Beemsterboer PM, de Koning HJ, Birnie E, et al. Advanced
80. Khran MD, Mahoney JE, Eckman MH, et al. Screening for prostate cancer. Course, care, and cost implications. Prostate
prostate cancer: A decision analytic view. JAMA 1994; 272: 773. 1999; 40: 97-104.
81. Benoit RM, Naslund MJ. The socioeconomic implications of 94. Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Gleason DF, Barry MJ. Competing
prostate-specific antigen screening. Urol Clin North Am 1997; risk analysis of men aged 55-74 years at diagnosis managed
24: 451-8. conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA
82. Madalinska JB, Essink-Bot ML, de Koning HJ, et al. Health- 1998; 280: 975-980.
related quality-of-life effects of radical prostatectomy and pri- 95. Albertsen PC, Fryback DG, Storer BE, et al. Long-term survi-
mary radiotherapy for screen-detected or clinically diagnosed val among men with conservatively treated localized prostate
localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1612-28. cancer. JAMA 1995; 274: 626-31.
83. Carter HB, Epstein JI, Chan DW, et al. Recommended prosta- 96. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathologic
te-specific antigen testing intervals for the detection of curable and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable
prostate cancer. JAMA 1997; 277: 1475-6. (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 1994; 271: 368-74.
84. Ross KS, Pearson JD, Guess HA, et al. Rational PSA screen-

.

O )
, , - . -
, . - -

. -
. .
O - test -
3045 , , -
().
5060 . O - -
65 .
-
- 1950, -
. - 3,4.
. - ,
471.000 - . O Ole-
, sen5
. - 428 -

, -
. 55% -
10 . ... 15.700 -
(6% ) 32% .
4.900 -
1.
, - test -
0,25. -
- -
. . 5 , -
- 0,67.
, . ( 20)
- (incidence rate)
, - (2535 ).
, -
. O ,
2. , -
-
-
(CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia SIL: 6. 1975 (-
squamous intraepithelial lesion). , , ) -
(

419
420 OY

.
, -
7,8,9.

,
,
-
. O rinton Fraumeni10

. -

11. -
2. . -
- HPV CIN I.

,
, , , - 5359 68
. - 95%, -
- 15,16,17 (.
1, 2).
. HPV ( )
O (herpes 1627
simplex type 2) . O .
,
12. - , -
- , -
. O -
. O 18. -
HPV (human papilloma virus). - HPV
DNA .
80 ,
40 . O -
HPV -
DNA13. . , -
- . -
-
2314. O 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, . O -
-
19, -
20,
21.

O
O OO O
:

;
,
. -
. -
, ,
1. -
HPV. 76% E -
VI. 421

. 19% - , , -
-
(test ). O 61% . test -
test - -
, , -
. .
,
(, , ), O , 2002 -
89%22. -
HPV test - test .
HPV,
23 198728. O )
, - , ) , )
.

O O H
, ) -
- )
O O- .
O -
O O O O (Gynecologic Cancer Advi-
... 50 sory Group, National Cancer Institute, American College
of Obstetricians, Harvard School of Public Health ..).
70%! O
test . O - .
,
, 13 29.
24.
O O O TEST
2003 13.000 -
OO;
-
..., 4.100 -
. O - 21 .
test ,
. O - -
- , -
5 100%, - -
92%24. . 3 -
- -
93100% ,
DNA HPV -
HPV ( 16, 18, 31,
33, 35)25,26. , -
, , - -
test , 30,31,32,33. -
-
. -
, -
, . -
, test (HIV -
70% 80%27. - ) -
: 34.
422 OY

O PEEI NA O O OO
O TEST OO; -
, , , test -
test 70 , . -
: ) -
, ) - 41,42,43,44,45.
test, ) - 19
10
. test - ,
, .

OO
.
-
- test43,44,45.
-

. - . -
Ca 50
-
35. - . -
,
. 70 , ,

(, , ),
, - -
36. -
. ,
O O O O
O (..
test DNA HPV ).
-
. O OOO O -
OO OO
,
(Y BETHESDA 2001)46

OOO
, 37.
1. . -
O O
- . -
test
test - .
, - 2. . .
, 2 , - -
. .
30
tests .
, 1.
. -
. :
.
( )38,39,40. 2. .
VI. 423

E 3. CIN II. E 4. CIN III ( ).

E 5. CIN II ( ). E 6. Ca .

: -
A: (Atypi- in situ: CIN , CIN
cal squamous cells of undetermined significans (. 3, 4, 5).
ASC-US). : (. 6).
: (LSIL, Low- :
grade squamous intraepithelial lesion). - : -
: 1. .
HPV ( ), 2. : -
- - .
HPV (. 2). : in situ.
: : (, -
(HSIL, High-grade intraepithelial lesion). - ).

1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Confe- 4. Hakama M, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Miller AB, Prorok PC.
rence Statement on Cervical Cancer. Gynecologic Oncology Evaluation of screening programmes for gynecological cancer.
1997; 66: 351-361. Br J Cancer 1985; 52: 669-673.
2. Park TW, Fuziwara H, Wright TC. Molecular Biology of Cer- 5. Olesen F. A case control study of cervical cytology before dia-
vical Cancer and its precurcors. Cancer 1995; 76: 1902-1913. gnosis of cervical cancer in Denmark. I. J Epidemiol 1988; 17:
3. Hazdou SI. American Cancer Society report on the cancer re- 501-508.
lated health checkup. Acta Cytol 1980; 24: 369-370. 6. Van der Graaf Y, Zielhuis GA, Vooijs GP. Cervical screening
424 OY

revisited. Acta Cytol 1990; 34: 366-372. 26. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papil-
7. Armstrong B, Holman D. Increasing mortality from cancer of lomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer world-
the cervix in young Australian women. Med J Aust 1981; 1: wide. J Pathol 1999; 189: 12-19.
460-462. 27. Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Herrero R, et al. Performance of
8. Cook GA, Draper GJ. Trends in cervical cancer and carcino- a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: Re-
ma in situ in Great Britain. Brit J Cancer 1984; 50:367-375. sults of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste,
9. Green GH. Rising cervical cancer mortality in young New Costa Rica. Cancer 1998; 84: 273-280.
Zealand women. NZ Med J 1979; 89: 89-91. 28. Fink DJ. Change in American Cancer Society Checkup Guide-
10. Brinton LA, Fraumeni JF Jr. Epidemiology of uterine cervical lines for detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1988;
cancer. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 1051-1105. 38: 127-128.
11. Beral V. Cancer of the cervix: A sexually transmitted infection? 29. Saslow D, Runovitcz C, Solomon D, Moscicki AB, Smith R,
Lancet 1974; I: 1037-1040. Cohen C. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the early
detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. Ca Cancer J Clin
12. Morse AR, Coleman DV, Gardner SD. An evaluation of cyto-
2002; 52: 342-362.
logy in the diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection and cyto-
megalovirys infection of the cervix uteri. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 30. Centers for Disease Control. CDC guideline for immunocom-
1974; 81: 393-398. promised women; USPHS/IDSA Guidelines for the preven-
tion of opportunistic infections in persons infected with human
13. Lorincz AT. Molecular methods for the detection of human
immunodefiency virus: A summary. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
papillomavirus infection. Obset Gynecol Clin N mer 1996;
1995; 44(RR-8): 1-34.
23: 707-730.
31. Syrjanen K, Kataja V, Yliskoski M, et al. Natural history of
14. Pfister H. The role of Human Papillomavirus in Anogenital
cervical human papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate
Cancer. Obset Gynecol Clin N Amer 1996; 23: 579-598.
the biologic relevance of the Bethesda System. Obstet Gynecol
15. von Knebel Doeberitz M, Rittmuler C, Geitz D, zur Hausen 1992; 79: 675-682.
H, Durst M. Inhibition of tumorigenicity of cervical cancer cells
32. Nasiell KV, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dys-
in nude mice by HPV 18-E7 antisense RNA. Cancer 1992; 51:
plasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67:
831.
665-669.
16. Kitchener H. Viral infection and lower genital tract neoplasia.
33. Nash JD, Burke TW, Hoskins VJ. Biologic course of cervical
In: Luesley D, Zordan I, Richard RM, eds. Intraepithelial
human papillomavirus infection. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 160-
Neoplasia of the Lower Genital Tract. London: Churchill Li- 162.
vingston, 1995: 83-94.
34. Goldie SJ, Kim J, Moscicki AB. Alternative policies for the
17. Bosch FX, Manos M, Munoz N. Human Papillomavirus in cer- initiation of cervical cancer screening. Plenary presentation at
vical cancer: a worldwide perspective international biological the National Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Mak-
study on cervical cancer. J of National Cancer Institute 1995; ing. San Diego, CA: October 2001. Abstract available: http://
87: 796-802. www.smdm.org/.
18. Franco E. Epidemiology of genital warts and cancer. Obset 35. Gustafsson L, Sparn P, Gustafsson M, et al. Low efficiency of
Gynecol Clin N Amer 1996; 23: 597-623. cytologic screening for cancer in situ of the cervix in older wo-
19. Schafer A, Friedmann W, Mielke M. The increased frequency men. Int J Cancer 1995; 63: 804-809.
of cervical dysplasia-neoplasia in women infected with the Hu- 36. Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Womack SM, et al. Benefits
man Immunodeficiency Virus is related to the degree of im- and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.
munosupression. Am J Obset Gynecol 1991; 164: 593-599. JAMA 2002; 287: 2372-2381.
20. Katj RL, Veanattukalathil S, Weiss KW. Human Papillomavi- 37. Fox J, Remington P, Layde P, et al. The effect of hysterectomy
rus infection and neoplasia of the cervix and anogenital region on the risk of an abnormal screening Papanicolaou test result.
in women with Hodgkins Disease. Acta Cytol 1987; 31: 845- Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1104-1109.
854. 38. Frame PS, Frame JS. Determinants of cancer screening fre-
21. Sasson I, Haley NJ, Hoffman D. Cigarette smoking and neo- quency: The example of screening for cervical cancer. J Am
plasia of the uterine cervix. Smoke constituents in cervical mu- Board Fam Pract 1998; 11: 87-95.
cus. N Eng J Med 1985; 312: 315-318. 39. International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group
22. Linos A, Rixa E, van Ballegooijen. Cervical cancer screening. on Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes.
European J of Cancer 2000; 36: 2227-2232. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: Duration of low risk
23. Syrjanen S. Basic concepts and practical applications of recom- after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication
binant DNA techniques in detection of Human Papillomavirus for screening policies. Br Med J 293: 659-664.
infection. APMIS 1990; 98: 95-110. 40. Lynge E, Poll P. Risk of cervical cancer following negative
24. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2002. smears in Maribo County Denmark 1966-1982. IARC Sci Publ
25. Bosch FX, Manos MM, Munoz N, et al. Prevalence of human 1986; 76: 69-86.
papillomavirus in cervical cancer: A worldwide perspective. In- 41. Diaz-Rosario LA, Kabawat SE. Performance of a fluid-based
ternational biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study thin-layer Papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of
Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 796-802. an independent laboratory and an outpatient screening popu-
VI. 425

lation in New England. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123: 817- of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Ri-
821. ca with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer 1999;
42. Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, et al. Comparison of con- 87: 48-55.
ventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based thin-layer 45. Belinson J, Qiao YL, Pretorius R, et al. Shanxi Province Cervi-
system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: cal Cancer Screening Study: A cross-sectional comparative
278-284. trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia. Gyne-
43. Marino JF, Fremont-Smith M. Direct-to-vial experience with col Oncol 2001; 83: 439-444.
AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology 46. Solomon D, Darey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, OConnor D,
practice. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 353-358. Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright, Young N.
44. Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of The 2001 Bethesda System. Terminology for reporting results
liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002; 287: 2114-2119.

VII
A


.. , . ........................................................................................ 431


. , N.. M ........................................................................ 445


B. . M, . K, . .................................................. 477


X.. T .................................................................................................................... 557


N.E. , A. M ........................................................................................ 575


. . , .

OKTHH
-
.
- -
(. 1). - .
O
, , .
. - 1992 -
...
- (National Cancer Institute NCI) 30.521
, - , 17.260 (),
2. 2.197 , 12.938 -
, 5.767 ..1. O
-
1. - . 19901995 -

30.000 , -
1. , NCI2-3.
2. Burkitt -
3. Hodgkin 400.000 . -
4.
5. O

6. -
7. OM NCI -
8. : (Taxol) -
9.
(Taxotere),
10.
11. taxus brevifolia taxus beccata ,
vinca rosea
O:
OM:
. O

, halichondrin-B
4, bryostatin 1
2. - Bugular neritina5 fu-
magillin aspergillus fumigatus6.
1. IAOH
2.
3.

4. (screening). O -
5. I
6. II
7. III
8.
(production and formulation).
NCI

431
432 OY

(model) -
L1210 388.
19751985 48
(, , -
..), -
-
(xenografts) (. 1).
1970

(established cell lines).
O -
1. (athymic, nude mou- -
se) (xenograft) MIA PA-CA-2. -
. -
MIA PA-CA-2 -
. O
MIA PA-CA-2 - 6 . -
2-106.
(cell
suspension) (. 2),
(monolayer)
(. 3). O
in vitro -
, , :
) ( -
12 12 -
-
), ) ( -

,
) )
.
2.
HL-60 . 1985 NCI
,
, - (29 .
.
/) (-
35
)7 .
60
-
( , ,
, , ,
). -
(multiple drug resistance MDR)

-
, -
-
3.
C26-10 .
, -
,
, - 8,9. 1990
. 64
VII. 433

, A
100

. -

K
50


0
, -
,
-50
( ) ..
,
-100
20.000 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5
Log10

IGROV 1 SK-OV -3
. 5%
OVCAR -8 OVCAR -4
- OVCAR -3 OVCAR -5
.
4. -
CI 6
,
. NCI.
-
, - 60 . -
- -
, (3,4,5-
--2) 2,5-- - NCI
()10-13 - (. 4). (composi-
- (SRB)14. te) -
13.
-
, - ,
(10-4 10-9 mol), -
. O
64 NCI. (percentage growth PG), -
-
( 96 ) 50% (growth inhibition 50%
0, 24 . - GI50), -
- (total growth inhibition TGI) -
50%
48 9. (lethal concentration 50% LC50).
( )
SRB. O -
- O (O)
, ,
. - . O
GI50, TGI
(dose-response curves) LC50 -
(mean-graphs). NCI.
O -

( ), -
, GI50
. .
- O
. -
434 OY

K Halichondrin-B

3 2 1 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 3
Leukenia
CCRF-CEN
HL-60 (TB)
K-562
MOLT-4
RPHI-8226
SR
Non-Small Cell Cancer
A549/ATCC
EKVX
HOP-18
HOP-62
HOP-92
NCI-H226
NCI-H23
NCI-H322N
NCI-H460
NCI-H522
LX FL-529L
Small cell lung cancer
DMS 114
DMS 273
Colon cancer
COLO 205
DLD-1
HCC-2998
HCT-116
HCT-15
HT29
KM12
KM20L2
SW-620
CNS cancer
SF-268
SF-295
SF-539
SNB-19
SNB-75
SNB-78
U251
XF 498
Melanoma
LOX IMVI
MALME-3M
M14
M19-MEL
SK-MEL-2
SK-MEL-28
SK-MEL-5
UACC-257
UACC-62
Ovarian cancer
IGROV1
OVCAR-3
OVCAR-4
OVCAR-5
OVCAR-8
SK-OV-3
Renal cancer
786-0
A498
ACHN
CAKI-1
RXF-1
RXF-631
SN12C
TK-10
UP-31
3 2 1 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 3

5. .

-
. , .
-
,
. , O,
3 . -
GI50 O GI50 - -
1.000 - 170 17-19.
GI50 (. 5). -

Compare , -
Compare - . -
- -
,
NCI. Compare -
NCI.
O 6.

VII. 435

.
3.
Compare - -
CI -
O . -
1/12 LD10

MTD 1/9 LD10
O - ( mg/kg) 1/7 LD10
1/3 LD10
. 1/2 LD10
Compare

( spon- 10% ), LD50 LD90.
gistatin 1, - LD10
)20, ( ), -
23. O Freireich et al23
( Halomon, - -
Portieria hornemannii)21. -
, NCI LD10
in vitro (. 3).
-

.
in vivo . ,
,
OO ,
- .

I
. -

- -
- -
. (. 4)24-27. O
( 15
OOO ), -
- .
, ,
. - .
- -
(, ) - ,
-
1980 - (
. O ). -
, -
LD10 (lethal dose 10%, .

4. O

(subtoxic dose)

(minimal toxic dose)

H
(recommended dose for therapeutic trial)
436 OY

5. - 6. -

1. A .
2. A .
3. A .
4. B
5. K V. :
6. M )
7. O )
8. O )
9. N Hodgkin )
10. M Hodgkins )
11. K )

. -
O - 35 -
- , 70
(. 5), .

. O - OO O OO IAOH
6. O NCI
- -
-
,
. O - NCI, -
1530. -
, . -
- -

, - .
. -
-
,
- -
, - . , , -
.
.
- -
, -
. ,
- - -
(randomization), - .
- 64
, - NCI,
. , -
- ,
, - .
- -
. -
-
- ,
VII. 437

28.876195.706. -
. CpG
- , 228.876
, -
. -
-. CpG
- , -
,
- 30,31. PTGS2, COX-2,
. CALCA, MTHFR, ESR1, MGMT, MYOD1 APC -
CpG
C-DNA MICROARRAYS (O)
- .
NCI Hamon
Cancer Center (47 NSCLC 44 SCLC 7 -
). - , 78%
23 91 - SCLC .
DNA
PCR Methyl-Light. NSCLC SCLC -
- -
CpG -
, - ,
-
. -
-
DNA -
- PCR Methyl-Light 32-34.
CpG 28,29. -
CpG -

Diagnostic ALL BM samples (n= 327)

E 6. -

ALL. -
Genes for class distinction (n= 271)

327
ALL ( ) -
271 ( -
).
40
-
2
7 -
. -
-

.
:

,
E2A- MILL T-ALL >50 BCR- Novel TEL-AML1
37. PBX1 ABL

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 = sid deviation from mean


438 OY

, - 80%, -
- .
360 ALL. DNA
(ALL) -

- 35.
. - -
-
-- ,
, . , -
- DNA -
- (), -
- 12.600 -
(. 6). 360 -
, : ALL.
t(9;22) [BCR-ABL], t(1;19) [E2A-PBX1], t(12;21) [TEL-
AML1], MLL chr 11q
q23. ALL,
T-ALL. H , -
, - . -
. , -
E2A-PBX1 - ,
-
, - 36,37 (. 7, 8, 9).

B-ALL T-ALL B-ALL


CD2
CD3
CD3 T
CD3
CD8

-4 -2 0 2 4
CD19
CD22 B
CD10

>50 MLL T-ALL TEL-AML1
BCR- E2A-
ABL PBX1 -4 -2 0 2

MLL E2A-PBX1 TEL-AML1


104 104 104
103 103 103
CD19

2 2
10 10 102
1 1
10 10 101

101 102 103 104 101 102 103 104 101 102 103 104
CD10 CD10

7. ALL. . set -
CD2, CD3 CD8 CD19, CD22 CD10
327 . O
, . X
. .
CD10 CD19 . -
, CD19,
CD10 , MLL, -
F2A-PBX TEL-AML1.
VII. 439

E2A- BCR-
PBX1 MLL TEL-AML1 ABL >50 Novel
U08023 MERTK Y09443
AL049381 PBX1 D31762
U33017 SLAM AF001601
Z15108 PRKCZ M55531
AB014555 KIAA0655 D88153
AB018345 KIAA0802 U26455
AB023139 KIAA0922 U07563
X87241 FAT U60519
D87119 GS3955 U84388
D86425 nidogen 2 J03040
AJ001687 NKG2-D X81109
U41813 HOXA9 M64925
A1201310 S100 A10 X02317
L05424 CD44 M33882
Y00062 PTPRC AL031177
U85707 Mcis 1 V00572
AF030339 Plexin CI X99584
AI535946 LGALSI M74524
AB007888 MBNL J02621
M94345 CAPG U56833
Z49194 POU2AF1 AF062006
U69883 KCNN1 X58288
M63928 TNFRSF7 AB029022
AB010419 MTG16 AJ222967
AB012124 TCFL5 D86961
Z46973 PIK3C3 AB014679
AF041434 PTP4A3 D21260
AB029035 ARHGEF4 U66306
AF070644 FLJ20154 AL050289
X17025 X17025 AI524125

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 = sid deviation from mean

8. . . 10 40 -
2 -
, .
DNA. -
38.


9. (profile) Support vector machine
- p= (Permutation test)
. -
T-ALL 97% 0,007
-
- A >50 100% 0,018

. - CCR
Z82206
X83301
UQCRFS1
SMA 5
- AB007851 PRPSAP2
T-ALL D29954
D34625
KIAA0056
Thromboxanc synthetase
. U01923 HMRPH2

1.000 - L05424 CD44

.
1.000 - CCR
W73822
J04132
FLJ22448
CD3zeta
- D83702
AB002344
CRY1
KIAA0346
, p. B . AB023207
AF042729
KIAA0990
IMPA1
AB007863 KIAA0403
T 7 20 AA151971 IMAGE 588365
U57693 TAF12
- HD AF000984
U04735
DBY
STCH
CCR T-ALL HD - W72733
AB023152
KIAA1536
KIAA0935
. X90999
D26067
HAGH
KIAA0033
M58459 Ribosomal protein S4
- AL080218 DKFZp586N1323
U79363 DHPS
DNA . U69559 RNF11
M29960 NR2C1
440 OY

O O
OO -
O O O ALL O
A , 11 12 -
. - RNA- -
-
- , ,
. - , , , , , -
, - , - / -
, , 70%
(. 10). ...
12.600 (set)
, -
20% ,
-
41-42. -
90%
175 , 9
12 . -
-
-
,
-
.

10. A -
, -

AML
ML TEL-AML1, ALL. A. -
ALL 2 A

A AML (2 AML) -
-
-
2 AML -
Support vector machine ALL 39. . -
p= (Permutation test) ALL BM -
-
TEL-AML1 100% 0,031
AML. -

TEL-AML1 CCR 2 AML 1.000 -
p
AA524802 -
AA255502
Z78388
, -
AA887480
W26023
AL050205 AML. . -
AI249721
AI864120
-
AF045451
L09235
D83174 -
AA554945
L12535
AML TL-AML1 + ALLS. -
T75292
U61981
HG2715-HT2811 -
J05448 DNA (DNA-sequence)
M69043
40.
VII. 441

Pr BI Br Co Ga Ki Li Ov Pa LA LS

Pr
(100%)

BI
(95%)
Br
(91%)
Co
(93%)

148 "classifier" genes


A
Ga
Pr BI Br Co Ga Ki Li Ov Pa LA LS (92%)
Ki
(99%)
1,100 genes, 100 per class

Li
(99%)

Ov
(95%)

Pa
(99%)
LA
(91%)
LS
(95%)
100 tumors 100 tumors

11. .
.
. . 100 ( 1.100)
, Wilcoxon rank-sum test ,
. Pr: , Bl: / , Br: , Co: , Ga: , Ki: , Li:
, Ov: , Pa: , LA: , LS: . .
1.100 .
( ) (). -
, , .
.

.V.
ABO11105: laminin, alpha 5
M25809: vacuolar proton pump
U40434: mesothelin (CAK1)
S72869: putative cytoskeletal protein
X15357: natriuretic peptide receptor A
U90916: unknown
U71207: eyes absent homolog
AL049313: unknown
X58079: S100 alpha
U62801: kallikrein 6
M98447: keratinocyte transglutaminase
X81892: GPCR64
U85707: meist
AB018305: spondin 1
AI936826: GPCR39
AL050069: unknown
AF071219: mammaglobin2
U21551: branched chain aminotransferase 1
AF035528: Smad6
X51630: WT1
S67247: non-muscle myosin heavy chain
U90028: bicaudal-D
M77016: tropomodulin
L13698: gas1
X17360: HOX 5.1
AB020682: F-box only protein 21
X17360: HOX 5.1
A U66619: Human SWI/SNF complex 60 KDa

12. . . E
. O
, ( ) -
( ). . A
, 36 229 10 -
. , , E. I WT. . -
WT. .
WT. E. K , WT ( ).
.
442 OY

- DNA -
-
44.

-
, , -
-
PCR Methyl-Light 32-34.
-
. -
43 -
-



ALL.
44.
- -
-

. -
- .
, (data base)
- -
, , -
AML, - ,
- ,
,
. .

1. Grever MR, Schepartz S, Chabner BA. The National Cancer for use in an anticancer drug screen. Anticancer Res 1992; 12:
Institute: Cancer drug discovery and development program. 1035-1054.
Sem Oncol 1992; 622-639. 9. Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P, et al. Feasibility of a high-
2. Paull KP, Hamel E, Malspeis L. Prediction of biochemical me- flux anticancer drug screen utilizing a diverse panel of human
chanism of action from the in vitro antitumor screen of the tumor cell lines in culture. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83: 757-
National Cancer Institute. In: Cancer Chemotherapeutic A- 766.
gents. Washington DC: American Chemical Society Books, 10. Rubinstein LV, Shoemaker RH, Paull KD, et al. Comparison
1995 (in press). of in vitro anticancer drug screening data generated with a te-
3. Van Osdol WW, Myers TG, Paull KD, et al. Use of the Koho- trazolium assay versus a protein assay against a diverse panel
nen self-organizing map to study the mechanisms of action of of human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1113-
chemotherapeutic agents. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 1853- 1118.
1859. 11. Carmichael J, Mitchell JB, De Graff WG, et al. Chemosensiti-
4. Jenks S, Volker N. News: Anticancer Drug Origins: Truth in vity of human lung cancer cell-lines using the MTT-assay. Br J
stranger than fiction. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 173. Cancer 1985; 57: 540-547.
5. Kraft AS. Editorial: Bryostatin 1: Will the Oceans provide a 12. Alley MC, Scudiero DA, Monks A, et al. Feasibility of drug
cancer cure? J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1790-1791. screening with panels of human tumor cell-lines using a micro-
6. Ingber D, Takeshi F, Kishimoto S, et al. Synthetic analogues culture tetrazolium assay. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 589-601.
of Fumagillin that inhibit angiogenesis and suppress tumor 13. Scudiero DA, Shoemaker RH, Paull KD, et al. Evaluation of a
growth. Nature 1990; 348: 555-557. soluble tetrazolium/formazen assay for cell-growth and surg
7. Boyd MR. Status of the NCI preclinical antigumor drug disco- sensitivity in culture using human and other tumor cell-lines.
very screen. n: De Vita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, Cancer Res 1988; 48: 4827.
eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 4th ed. Phi- 14. Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D, et al. New coloremetric cy-
ladelphia: PA Lippincott, 1993: 286-288. totoxicity assay for anticancer drug screening. J Natl Cancer
8. Stinson SF, Alley MC, Fiebig H, et al. Morphologic and im- Inst 1990; 82: 1107-1112.
munocytochemical characteristics of human tumor cells lines 15. Michael R, Kenneth D. Some practical considerations and ap-
VII. 443

plications of the national cancer institute in vitro anticancer 30. Esteller M, Corn PG, Baylin SB, et al. A gene hypermethyla-
drug discovery screen. Development Research 1995; 34: 91- tion profile of human cancer. Cancer Research 2001; 61: 3225-
109. 3229.
16. Weinstein JN, Kohn KW, Grever MR, et al. Neural computing 31. Goessl K, Krause H, Miller M, et al. Fluorescent methylation
in cancer drug-development. Predicting mechanisms of action. specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based detection
Science 1992; 258: 447-451. of prostate cancer in bodily fluids. Cancer Research 2000; 60:
17. Khanna T. Foundations of neural networks. Telemat Informat 5491-5495.
1990; 7: 403. 32. Eads CA, Lord RV, Wickramasinghe K, Long TI, et al. Epi-
18. Johnson RK. Screening method in antineoplastic drug discove- genetic pattern in the progression of esophageal adenocarcino-
ry. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990: 1082-1083. ma. Cancer Research 2001; 61: 3410-3418.
19. Paull KD, Lin EM, Malpespeis L, et al. Identification of novel 33. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. The sequence of the
antimitotic agents acting at the tubulin-I level by computer human genome. Science 2001; 291: 1304-1351.
assisted evaluation of differential cytotoxicity data. Cancer Res 34. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, et al. Initial se-
1992; 52: 3892-3900. quencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409:
20. Petti GR, Cichacz ZA, Cao F, et al. Isolation and structure of 860-921.
spongistatin 1. Org Chem 1993; 58: 1302-1304. 35. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Dars RE, et al. Distinct types of dif-
21. Fuller RW, Cardellina JH II, Kato Y, et al. A pentahaloge- fuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression pro-
nated monoterpene from the red alga Portieria Hornemannii, filing. Nature 2000; 403: 503-511.
produces a novel cytotoxicity profile against a diverse panel of 36. Yeoh EJ, Ross ME, Shurtleff SA, et al. Classification, subtype
human tumor cell lines. J Med Chem 1992; 35: 3007-3011. discovery and predretion of outcome in pediatric acute lym-
22. Goldsmith MA, Slavik M, Carter SK. Quantitative prediction phoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling. Cancer Cell
of drug toxicity in human from toxicology in small and large March 2002; 1: 133-143.
animals. Cancer Res 1975; 35: 1354-1364. 37. Arico M, Valsecchi MG, Camitta B, et al. Outcome of treat-
23. Freireich EJ, Gehan EA, Rall DP, et al. Quantitative compari- ment in children with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute
son of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, lymphoblastic leukemia. N Eng J Med 2000; 342: 998-1006.
monkey and men. Cancer Chemotherapy Rep 1966; 50: 219- 38. Bioudi A, Cimrco G, Prefers R, et al. Biological and therapeu-
244. tic aspects of infant leukemia. Blood 2000; 96: 24-33.
24. Homan ER. Quantitative relationships between toxic doses of 39. Armstrong SA, Staunton JE, Silverman LB, et al. MLL trans-
antitumor chemotherapeutic agents in animals and man. Can- locations specify a distinct gene expression profile that distin-
cer Chemother Rep 1972; 3: 3-19. guishes a unique leukemia. Nat Genet 2002; 30: 41-47.
25. Rosencweig M, Von Hoff DD, Staquet MJ, et al. Animal Toxi- 40. Hunger SP. Chromosomal tranlocations involving the E2A ge-
cology for carly clinical trials with anticancer agents. Cancer ne in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: clinical futures and mole-
Clin Trials 1981; 4: 21-29. cular pathogenesis. Blood 1996; 87: 1211-1224.
26. Gieshaber KC, Marsoni S. Relation of preclinical toxicology to 41. Colub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, et al. Molecular classifica-
findings in early clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 1986; 70. tion of cancer; Class discovery and class prediction by gene ex-
27. Special Article: Joint screening Committee of the European pression monitoring. Science 1999; 286: 531-537.
Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 42. Hogenesch JB, Chung KA, Batalov S, et al. A comparison of
and the Cancer Research Campaign (CRC). Eur J Cancer the celera and fusembl predicted gene sets. Cell 2001; 106:
1990; 26: 411-414. 413-415.
28. Virmani AK, Tsou JA, Siegmund D, et al. Hierarchical cluster- 43. Ramaswamy S, Tamayo P, Rifkin R, et al. Multiclass cancer
ing of Lung Cancer cell-lines using DNA methylation markers. diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proc Natl
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention March 2002; Acad Scien USA 2001; 98: 15148-15154.
11: 291-297. 44. Su AI, Welsh JB, Sapinoso LM, et al. Molecular classification
29. Costello JC, Fruhwald MC, Smiraglia DJ, et al. Aberrant of human carcinomas by use of gene expression signatures.
CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumor type spe- Cancer Research 2001; 61: 7388-7393.
cific patterns. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 132-138.

. , . .

KO YO A O OY YO
1. G1
. . -
. .
2. S D . -
, 10 .
.
3. G2 .
-
D . -
( )
. . .
- 4. . -
, , ,
( - (. 2).
) ,
, -
, -
( ). -
O . .
, - 5. G0 - . -
(-
G1. O-
).
G1

(G1) -
(G0). O - G1.

. H A O OY
- -
, , -
- .
(. 1). -

-
G2 M
. -
,
G0 , / -
S G1 (. 3).

-
,
1. . .

445
446 OY

, .

. .

- , .
.


( ).
, ,
"" .

,
.
.

2. .

1Kg 1012


1gr 109



1mg 106

1g 103

C 1

3. .
VII. 447

A O OY YO A
OY AO

O
D 2 2

-. -
DNA DNA

, , DNA
D
D,
D. CH2CH2CI
- CH3 N
CH2CH2CI
.
(Mechlorethamine)
O , -
, -
- CH3
. N

. CH2 CH2
- CH2 CH2
, -
, ,
, , -
-
2 2
. -
- DNA DNA
, , DNA
- 4. .
-
.
- , -
- DNA -
- . -
, - .
ii. -
. -
( -
(Nitrogen Mustard) ),
, G1 S.
A
. : 2---(2--
)--.
, : Cariolysin mp 10 mg.
. .
: - -
. .
7 DNA - : -
(. ,
4). -
i. O - . /
. -
448 OY

, - H
15 -
2% H
. O=P-R
10 ml -
. H
( 1 - 5. .
3 ) (push) -
. : Endoxan, Cyclophosphamide
: 100 mg, 200 mg, 500 mg, 1.000 mg, Tabl 50
/ + + + mg.
+ + : -
+ + 24 -
. 6 . -
: . - , .
- -
. - , O OOO OO.
, - 5%, -
. Ringer.
( dgkins - , -
, ). (
( ). ), -
: - -
dgkin .
, - -
(O) , , - .
O/VD. - : -
- . -
.
1020 mg - (Area Under Curve
- AUC) -
. .
, - , -
.
2030% -
, , - -
.. - .
- :
.

(Cyclophosphamide) 510 ,
: , , -
- ,
P450. - + + +
, - / + +
. - + +
( , Mes-
DNA. na)
: 2-[(2-)-]- (-
2-1,3,2--2- (. )
5).
VII. 449

( 50% -
, ) Mesna,
( - -
, Hodgkins , ). . O
: -
- ,
Hodgkins - -
, , - .
, , - : Mesna (Uromitexan) mp 200 mg,
, - 400 mg. 20% -
Ewing, , 0, 4 8 .
.. - Mesna ( Coca-Cola).
: , -
- .
Wegener. (Melphalan)
(Ifosphamide) (L-Phenylalanine Mustard, L-PAM)
: - :
- DNA.
. - : L-phenylalanine mustard (-
4 ), L-PAM (-
. ) (. 6).
in vivo
. -
NH2
34 R CH2CHCOOH
. -
3849%
. 6. .
: 1,3,2-O,3-(2--
)-2-[]--2-. : Alkeran 50 mg, Tabl 2
: Holoxan 200 mg, 500 mg, 5 mg.
mg, 1.000 mg. : -
: 200 mg
5 ml , 500 mg 13 ml 100 ml . O
1.000 mg 25 ml. - -
. , 0
336 . O 90 57 .
50%, , ,
20%. - AUC 39%
, - .
. -
.
- :
. / + +
: + +
+ + + +
/ + + +
+ + +
( ) +
. - +
450 OY

( - , , -
). , Walderstrom -
: - . -
- (.. ).
( Alexanian) - (Busulphan)
: . -
-
, , - DNA,
. - DNA.
- : 1,4---
. (. 8).
(Chlorambucil)
O O
: . O
- CH2 O S (CH2)4 S O CH3
.
O O
: 4-[(2-)-]-
8. .
(. 7).

: Myleran Tabl 0,5 mg 2 mg.


: -
R CH2CH2CH2COOH
.
.

7. . . O
3 .
: Leukeran Tabl 2 mg, 5 mg.
: - .
. - :
4070 + + + (.
1530 mg . O -
90 .
: . -
+++ (
2 , -
, - )
)
O ( < 400 mg) + +
( > 400 mg)
( ) + (
( - < 500 mg, , -
1 ) . )
+ Addison +
/ + +
( - ( -
). ).
: , : -
, - . -
- (.. -
, ( - , -)
), - . -
VII. 451

O
.
CICH2CH 2NCNH R
(Thiotepa)
NO
: -
9. .
. -
.

: (1-)-
, -
.
,
: Thiotepa 15 mg.
-
: 1,5 ml .
.

-
, 5% -
.
Ringer, .
, -
5 . -
-
.
. O
. -
-
.
DNA ,
:
RNA . -
+ + +
, -
/ +
, -
+
, DNA.
+
( - (Carmustine BCNU)
1.000 mg/m2, , - : DNA,
, ) -,
( -
- .
- : 1,3-(2-)-1-.
). : BiCNU 100 mg.
: : -
(3 ml )
27 ml .
. - 100 ml
. 5% (O -
- O). 3045
5 .
70%
. - , . -
- 1550%
- .
. :
/ + + +
OZOYPIE + + + ( ,
O -- 4 6
-- (MNU) (. 9). - )
- +
, +
, , , O .
OO O O,
. MNU -
452 OY

. )
. ( -
: - ).
, , : -
, , . .
(Lomustine CCNU) (Streptozocin)
: . :
: 1-(2-)-3--1-- Streptomyces achro-
. mogenes. DNA -
: CeCeNU Caps 5 mg, 40 mg. . -
: DNA-O6--
. O 15
-DNA- (O6-),
24 50%
.
. -
: 1---.
3050% . -
: Zanosar 1 gr.
, -
:
.
5%, -
.
2 mg/ml -
:
1560 . O
/ + + +
515 50%
+ + + ( ,
4 . 1020%
4 6
.
)
:
+
/ + +
+
(10% ). -
, -
-
.

: -
, Hodg- ( 3070% -
kin . )
(Methyl CCNU MeCCNU)
: . (, , , -
: 1-(2-)-3-(4-- , , Fanconi)
)-1-. +.
: Semustine Caps 10 mg, 50 mg, : O , -
100 mg. , , .
:
. - O
16 . - -
.
> 30% . -
:
/ + + -
+ + ( , -
, - .
) ,
+ ( ,
1.500 mg/m2, - -D
.
VII. 453

. -
, -
-
. . -
-
, , - DNA -
DNA RNA, DNA .
RNA, : ,
, . O
. 12 -
, , - . 20% -
. .
: Mitomycin C 2 mg.
-D (D-actinomycin)
:
: + + + (,
- DNA, )
RNA. + +
Streptomyces parvulus. + +
: Cosmegen 0,5 mg (- / +
). +
: . O - ( , -
3648 , , , -
. 15% , )
20 , + +
30% .
: O
/ + + + ( )
+ + + ( -
O O O OOO
) O O.
, + +
: , , -
+ ( -
, , -
)
-, , .


(- O ,
, ) S:
DNA:
-
O O O OO- DNA, -
O O O. DNA RNA.
: , Wilms, - -
, Ewing, , - : -
. - -
- .
, Paget, Kaposi -
. -
: P450 (-
(Mitomycin C) )
: O
Streptomyces caspitosus .
454 OY

(O2), - .
, - -
DNA. P-
- ,
(SOD) . O , - -
, - .
.
(Daunorubicin)
-
. - -
- -
1960. -
-
. -
.
: Daunoblastine 20 mg.
. : 100
, ml 1520 .
- :
. + + +
+ + + ( -
(), ) -
, - . OO -
. OOO DEXRAZOXANE (Cardioxa-
(- ne 500 mg)
), - + + +
, , , , / + +
, . , + +
,
, , -
, , , (-
. , )
1 O O O OO-
231 O O O.
( 33 , - : O , Wilms.
23 ).
- (Doxorubicin)
(multi-drug resistan-
ce). -
vinca, - ,
.. MDR 1 -
, -
, P-, 170 .
kd. P- - : Adriblastina, Doxorubicin
- 10 mg, 50 mg.
- : .
. :
+ + + ( )
P-- + + + ( -
, ) -
- ( 550 mg/m2 -
(gene amplification) , 450 mg/m2 -
VII. 455

- : .
) -
I (Idarubicin)
. -
, - (-) -
4872 . O- .
O OOO : Zavedos 5 mg, 10 mg.
DEXRAZOXANE (Cardioxane 500 mg) : -
+ + + (1014 ) , .
/ + + -. O -
, 22 -
, + +
.
:
(- + + +
, ) + + + ( -
O O O OO- ) -
O O O. ( ). OO
- OOO DEXRAZO-
( - XANE (Cardioxane)
, ). + + + (1014 )
: O , Hodgkin, / + +
Hodgkins , , - , + +
. , Wilms, -
, , - O O O OO-
. O O O
(Epirubicin) -
- , ,
. .
: Farmorubicin 10 mg, 50 : O (1
mg. ). O -
: . (2 ).
:
(Mitoxantrone)
+ + + ( )
+ + + ( -
) - .
( 1.100 mg/m2) - .
- -
. DNA -
. OO - -
OOO DEXRAZOXA- .
NE (Cardioxane) . -
+ + + (1014 )
/ + + S -
, + + G2,
.
-
(-
, ) . -
O O O OO- -
O O O. ,
456 OY

P- )
- + +
. + + (
: Novantrone, Genefantrone -
20 mg, 25 mg, 30 mg. )
: . O - , +
40 - ,
-
(, - O O O OOO
). , O O.
510% : -
. , -
: . -
+ + -
+ + + ( .
). - Kaposi
160 mg/m2 -
+ + CD4 (< 200 CD4 /mm3) -
.
: -
/ + + Caelyx ,

O O O OO- -
O O O .
160 mg/m2.
: O , -
, . .
O O
(Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin)
G1
o Caelyx

-
- L- (L-Asparaginase)
(MPEG). L-, -
- ,
- 1953.
(MPS), (Escheri-
. chia coli Erwinia cartovora) -
: Caelyx -
, .
Streptomyces peu- : L-,
cetius var. caesius. - , DNA
- RNA
. .
: Caelyx Amp 2 mg/ml. : Erwinase 10.000 IU.
: To Caelyx : , -
2050 mg/m2 30 , - . O
. 830 . -
: -
/ + + 1050%
+ + ( 1014 .
VII. 457

: (. 10).
( - , -
,
) DNA
+ + S -
+ + . -
+ -
+ . O
+ + - -
+ -
: - -
. - .
,
. -
: - .
- -
( -
5060%). - (, , ), -
- DNA,
3050%. .
.
S 5- (5-FU, Fluorouracil)
5- 1957 Hei-
O delberger et al -

, - DNA -
, - .
. : 5--2,4(1,3).
DNA : :
- FdUMP (fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate) -
DNA, ,

DNA (. 11)
FUMP RNA -


FdUTP FdUMP, -
DNA (. 12).

FH4


5-FUTP dUMP dTMP
-

DNA RNA 5-FU DNA

10. - 11. 5-
DNA. .
458 OY

dUMP

FdUMP CH2THF
TK

TS
dTMP dTTP
DNA
TS

CH2THF dNTP
FdUMP
DNA
dUMP

dUMP UDG

12. .

: Fluorouracil (Roche) 250


mg, 20 mg, Fluorouracil (DBL /
Santa) 250, 500 mg. +
: 80% ,
. - , ().
FdUMP. O 5-FU -
24 . (. 1).
. - : , -
. ,
, - .
. : -
: -
( , ,
, , -
, ). -
.
+ + ( - . -
710 )
, - , .. -
-, -
(5060%) ,
+ + ( -
, - .
-
) , , ..
+ + (
)
1. -
- (
)
( - 5-FU 5-FU
)
(-) -
(, -

, -

, )
VII. 459

(Tegafur) +
: 1-(2)-5-- +
.
: 5-FU, (-
- )
- 5-. (-
: Ftorafur Amp 400 mg, Caps 400 , -
mg. )
: - ( )
.
2 . .
: - : -
5-FU. , .
+ : O , -
+ .
+
(Capecitabine)
+
+ : 5--5---.
+ : 5---
, 5-
( ). FU.
: Xeloda Caps 150 mg, 500 mg.
: , :
. 2.500 mg/m2 -

, 2 , -
.
- (Cytarabine) :
H - +
Cryptothethya crypta - +
, - +
, . -
: 1--D--.
: DNA-, - ( ).
DNA, DNA. -
: Aracytin 100 mg, 500 mg. ( ).
: , - : -
, . - .
, - : ,
- .
. -
720 . (Gemcitabine)
50% 2 : -.
. : -
-, -
S . DNA
- , -
. - -
: .
+ + : Gemzar. 200 mg, 1.000 mg.
/ + : .
+ :
460 OY

+ + + : -
+ + 6-.
+ + : O -
, , .
, 6- (6-Mercaptopurine)
,
: 1,7--6--6-.
,
: de novo -
.
. RNA DNA
: , .
, , - : Purinethol Tabl 50 mg.
, . - : .
:
-. + + +

+ +
6- 2-- , 6- (
, Hitching Elion ).
1954 1955 - : -
30 . , , -
6-- 3050%.
. - .
, - : O -
--- .
- (. 13).
(Azathioprine)
(Thioguanine) : --
: 2--1,7----6-- 6- -
. , -
: de novo - .
. RNA DNA : Imuran Amp 50 mg 100 mg,
. Tabl 50 mg.
: Lanvis Tabl 40 mg. : -
: . O . .
90 . :
. +
: +
+ + + +

+ + .
( :
).

O SH SH
H H H
N H N H N H

2 2

6- 6-

13. .
VII. 461

(
1/31/4 ).
:
-
.



(Hydroxyurea)
: .
: -

, DNA.
: Medroxyurea Caps 500 mg.
: , - DNA


12 .
-
3 . O 14. .
5,5 7080%
12 .
: , -
+ +. DNA RNA (. 14). O -
, - -
10 ,
. - ,

- .
12 : Methotrexate, Emthexate, Metho-
+ blastin.
+ : , , -
+ , (-
+ ( , , ).
). 15 mg.
-
. 24 ,
1012
: - .
,
, -
,
, .
- -
. .


, -
- (Methotrexate) .
: 4-,4-,-10---
- . . -
:
. - . 5080%
. - 12
(FH4), . -
462 OY

1 gr, ,
. DNA Fe--
: DNA.
+ + + tRNA.
, , + + : Bleocin Amp 15 mg.
O (, , : 1020 mg/m2 -
, , ) , -
+ . O -
+ ( 24
, . O
30% 3
) 5 .
+ ( ) :
(, 412
) + + +
/ + +
, OOO
/ +
+ +
( , - + +
, , ). , +
+
- +
. ( ).
, -
: 50%

.
.
, , -
70
, , -
300 mg/m2
, . -
Raynaud
-
O O
. -
300 mg/m2.
. -
, . : -, Hodg-
: O (O), Ca - kin, Hodgkins , , ,
, , , - , , , -
, , , .
-, , - (Mithramycin)
.
-
G2 ,
.

-
(Bleomycin) .
O - : Mithramycin Amp 2,5 mg.
Streptomyces verticul- :
lus, .
. 6 .
10 - :
, - + + +
2. ,
: H , (II, V, VII,
VII. 463

X) + + + ,
O , + + -
+ + + .
/ / +
(Etoposide VP 16)
,
: 4--9-
[4,6-O-(R)---].
. : , -
DNA-
: -
.
, -

,
S G2
.
G2 .
: Vepesid, Etoposide Amp 100 mg
/ 5 ml, Caps 100 mg.
-
:
,
. - 3060 100 mg
- 250500 ml 5%.
, O -
(. 2).
- -
. -
(, -
), -
-
. . () -
90
3 11 . -
2.
100 mg/m2 5 . -
(VP 16)
((VM 26) AUC (area under curve)
Vinca
100
mg/m2 600 mg/m2. -
. -
-
Taxus AUC

50% -
.
:
+ + +
(Podophy- / + +
lum peltatum) , -
, +
. +
+
. - +
1940, - +
(0,72%)
. -
, , - -
-
464 OY

Stevens-Johnson -
, - O -
-
.
-
. -
: , - ,
, Hodgkin,
Hodgkins , , - .
, , Wilms, . -
: -
. -
.
(Teniposide VM 26) -
: 4--9- ,
[4,6-O---D-]. , , , , -
: . .
: Vumon Amp 50 mg.
: . -
, ,
. - . -
-
. O
610 , - -
, .
2448 , (Vinblastine)
.
: .
:
:
+ + +
. -
/ + +
-
+ +
. -
+ +
Vinca Rosea. -
35% , -
( -

), .
.
: Velbe Amp 10 mg.
: , - : . -
, Hodgkin, , -
Hodgkins , , Wilms,
Ewing, , - -
- .
. (4399,7%).


. 50% -
Vinca Rosea ,
Vinca Rosea 20 . -
- 15%
-. .
,
. - 5
- . O -
VII. 465

5399 .
2024 . 55155 ,
:
( , 23 85 . -
) + + + .
, , + -
/ + 2030
( - .
- :
) + ,
, , - 40 . -
, , , - -
, , , - . , -
, , + ,
+ , -
Raynaud + , , -
+ , ,
+ , , , .
- -
() -
( , - , , ,
, , ) , -
. , -
. , , , , -
: Hodgkin, Hodgkins - , ,
, , Kaposi,
. +
: , / +
. +
, - +
. +
+ +
(Vincristine) + +
: 22-. +
: . -
Catharanthus rosea. ()
: Oncovin, Vincristine Amp 1 mg.
: . - ,
, - -
.
- : O , Hodg-
. kin, Hodgkins , , -
. , , -
(48% ). Ewing, Wilms.
70% : .
,
12% (Vindesine)
( ). : 3--4-O--3-
()-.
. - : .
5 - : Gesidine Amp 5 mg.
466 OY

: . - . -
, - . -
50% 50% -
- .
. H ,
, . , -
: .
. :
- -
, -
. .
: Taxol Amp 30 mg.
, - : , -
, 175 mg/m2 3 -
(, , ..). . -
O , -
.
.
,
+ +
. -
+ +
-
+
, -
+.
2 . -
: . -
: . 18 5 .
(Vinorelbine) , -
: . 30%
. .
: avelbine Amp 10 mg, 50 mg, :
Caps 20 mg, 30 mg. (, -
: - , , , )
Vinca .
- ,
. ,
:
( , - ,
) + + +
/ + /
+ +
+
.
: , , .
. : -
,
, -
-
.
,
(Taxus Brevifolia), : -
. -
, 450
(Paclitaxel) (, , -
Taxus Brevifolia , , , ). -
..., , .
VII. 467

, - . DNA
. -
- . -
(Docetaxel)
-
- .
Ta- : Cis--- (.
xus baccata, . 15).
: .
: Taxotere Amp 20 mg, 80 mg.
H3N CI
:
-
Pt
75100 mg/m2 3 . -
24 H3N CI
48 . 15. .
:
, , : (-SH) -
, ,
. , DNA (. 16).
, , : Platinol, Platamine, Cisplatin, Pla-
, , . - tosin Amp 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg.
5% : 3060 -
.
, . -
, ,
,
/ , -
. ,
: . O -
, -
. .
--
. , -
:
, , - -
, , , . . , -
20

, 1 24 . -
(Cisplatin) , -
H . 2370%
- 24 90%

H3N G G
Pt H3N
Pt G G
H3N G G
Pt
16. . H 3N H3N H3N




468 OY

5 . - , -
. , . -
:
/ + + + ( - .
). :
. - .
, - ,
, .
.
(Carboplatin)
-
, - -

-
5-3 -
. O

-

-
+ + + ( O A
-
, 100 ml /

)
.
( ) + +
: Cis--[1,1---
+
-(2-)O,O] .
+. 8 -
: O -
-

(), -
.

: Paraplatin, Carboplatin, Carbo-
-,
sin, Megaplatin Amp 50 mg, 150 mg, 450 mg.
. O -
: ,
, / -
250 ml
-
5%. -
, -


. 4 -
+ ( 60% -
-
, )
()
+ ( , -
. -
)
6 -
Raynaud +
1 .
( -
, -
, - . -
40% 12 ). , -
: - . -
- .
- -

. - . -
, .
, - :
, , , - + + + (
21 -
, , , - 28 ,
, , , - -
, Hodgkin, Hodgkins , )
VII. 469

/ + +
+ ( ) . 72
+ 8 . -
+ .
+. :
: / + + + ( )
, +
- (, -
, )
, , - ,
-
-, -

.

: -
+.
.
: Hodgkin, , -
O (Oxaliplatin) .
: - (DACH-
Pt). (Temodal)
: O H , -
. . MTIC
: Eloxatin Amp 1.000 mg. DTIC. O -
:
125130 mg/m2 34 . MTIC.
. - : 8--3-- (5,1-)
2 . -1,2,3,5--4 (3)-1.
: :
O - DNA.
, - : Temodal Caps 5 mg, 100 mg,
250 mg.
+ : 150 mg/m2 /
/ + +. 5 , 4 . 20
. -
: (- , 200 mg/
2 ), , m2. 1,8 .
, , , -, - .
. :

/ + +
+ ( 20 )
(Dacarbazine DTIC) +
H , - +
, , +
. - +.
: 5 (3,3--1-)-- : ,
4-. , ( ), -
: DNA, -- ( ).
DTIC IC (methyl-triazeno-imidazole car-
boxamide). (Procarbazine)
: Deticene Amp 100 mg. O,
: ( DNA,
150300 mg/m2 310 ). O - .
40 . 50% : --(2--
470 OY

-)-p-. . -
: . O - 3090 . O
- 710 .
- :
( - / + +
, , ) - + +
DNA. , ,
-
. ,
- ( , , -
. - )
S , (, , , -
. - )

-
. .
: Natulan Caps 50 mg. : ,
: , ( ), -
( ).

3. O

OO



,

.

-D
, , ,
, , trastusumab
5- .




. ( ) ,
, , , , .
. - ()


. O
/ , , .
(flush syndrome).
.
. O
,
. (, , ,
, ..)
,
VII. 471

:
( -
). -
, ,
,
(-
, ..), -
.

-
, ,

17.
,
(. 3).
.

OH OO OI
(. 4). O -
, -
, -
.
. -
, , OOO
, , -
- , -
. .
-
OOO ,
. -
(. 17) , (-
, - , ) (. 5).

4.

p.o.

> 100120 mg/kg 2 , /
/
> 550 mg/m2 ( ) ,
< 550 mg/m2 ( )
> 550 mg/m2 ( ) ,
5- ,


> 100140 mg/m2 ( ) ,


O
O
472 OY

5.

> 1.200 mg/m2 ( ) / / /


,
50200 mg/m2 (),
, ,
> 50 mg/kg (
), ,

1,2 gr/m2 /15


> 30 mg/m2 ( ) ,

-
.
10% .
40% - OOO
(- -
). O (93%) ,
(78%) . -
(. 6).
-
-

, , , . . -
VOD (veno-occlusive disease), -
, -
. Mesna - , , -
, - .

6.

. ,
,
VOD
VOD
VOD
VOD
, ,

VOD
.
. ,
, VOD
, /
1,5 gr
VOD
. , VOD

VOD: (veno-occlusive disease)


VII. 473

7.

B > 400 U ( ) / ,
.
, .

> 1 gr/m2 ( ) ,
/
/
-


OH OO . O -

, - (FIO2) 30%.
. - -
-
. > 400 U (. 7).
-
- H OO
, O
. - -
, , , ,
, - , , -
, - .
, , - - (-
, - ), -
(, , - , , -
, ). - , -
- (. 8).

8.

B ,


-
,


-

,
,
,

474 OY

H OO
9. -
O ,
,


.





(. 9).
- O
.
, O

-
- . -
. O (. 10):
1. O , 12
, , -
, . -
( - -
, , - .
2. , 24 -
). -
.
- 3. (anticipated emesis). -

. . -
, ( 4 )
(
). - -
- . .

10.

(6090%) (3060%) (1030%) <10%

> 75 mg < 75 mg > 1 gr


> 500 mg < 500 mg > 75 mg
> 200 mg > 1 gr < 250 mg p.o.
> 75 mg < 75 mg p.o.
- > 1 gr < 400 mg -
> 60 mg < 200 mg
< 60 mg
> 400 mg
-D 5-
VII. 475


1. Benjamin RS. The Cerenex Chemotherapy Handbook. Uni- gnosis patients with germ cell tumors. J BUON 2002; 7: 35-41.
versity of Texas: Publ. Cerenex, 1993. 15. Porcu P, Bhatia S, Sharma M, et al. Results of treatment after
2. DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Cancer. Principles and relapse from high-dose chemotherapy in germ cell tumors. J
Practice of Oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993. Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1181-1186.
3. Perry M. The chemotherapy Source Book. Baltimore: Williams 16. Athanassiou AE, Radulovic S, Ziras N, Potamianou A, Pecta-
and Wilkins, 1992. sides D, et al. Docetaxel with or without mitoxantrone as first
4. O. . : O, 2003. line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a
5. British National Formulary (BNF). London: BMA and PCGB, multicenter phase II study. J BUON 2001; 6: 371-381.
2000. 17. Hetzel DJ, Dent J, Reed WD, et al. Healing and relapse of se-
6. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Handbook for Staging vere of peptic esophagitis after treatment with omeprazole.
of Cancer. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 903.
7. Katzung BG. Basic and clinical pharmacology. 7th ed. Apple- 18. Dergman OJ. Oral infections and septicemia in immunocom-
ton and Lange, 1998. promized patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Mi-
8. Goodmans and Gilmans the pharmacological basis of thera- crobiol 1988; 26: 2105.
peutics. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2001. 19. Hersh EM, Wong WG, Henderson ES, Freireich EJ. Hepato-
9. Loehrer PJ, Einhorn LH, Elson PJ, et al. A randomized com- toxic effects of methotrexate. Cancer 1966; 19: 1600.
parison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexa- 20. Basurto C, Corgna E, et al. (Italian Group for Antiemetic Re-
te, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic uro- search). Cisplatin induced delayed emesis: Pattern and pro-
thelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol 1992; gnostic factors during three subsequent cycles. Ann Oncol
10: 1066-1072. 1994; 5: 579-85.
10. Rosier JF, Bruniaux M, Husson B, et al. Role of 22difluoro- 21. Gregoire V, Hittelman WN, Rosier JF, Milas L. Chemoradio-
deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) induced cell cycle dysregulation therapy: radiosensitizing nucleotide analogues. Oncol Rep 1999;
in radioenhancement of human head and neck squamous cell 6: 949-57.
carcinomas. Radioth and Oncol 2004; 70: 55-61. 22. Lawrence TS, Davis MA, Loney TL. Fluoropyrimidine-media-
11. van der Hage JA, Putter H, Bonnema J, Bartelink H, et al. Im- ted radisensitization depends on cyclin E depended kinase a-
pact of locoregional treatment on the earlystage breast cancer ctivation. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 3202-6.
patients. A retrospective analysis. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39(15): 23. Bourthis J, Calais G, Eschwege F. Chemoradiotherapy of car-
2192-9. cinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Cancer Radiother
12. Pectasides D, Pectasides M, Farmakis D, Bountouroglou N, et 1998; 2: 679-88.
al. Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in 24. Pectasides D, Glotsos J, Bountouroglou N, Kouloubinis A, et
pretreated advanced breast cancer: a phase II study. Ann On- al. Weekly chemotherapy with docetaxel, gemcitabine and cis-
col 2003; 14: 537-542. platin in advanced transitional cell urothelial cancer: a phase
13. Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Rigipoulos A, Bountouroglou N, II trial. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 243-250.
et al. An outpatient second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan 25. Taylor IV SG, Murthy AK, Griem KL, et al. Concomitant cis-
and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer pre- platin/5FU infusion and radiotherapy in advanced head and neck
viously treated with cisplatinbased chemotherapy: a phase II cancer: 8 year analysis results. Head Neck 1997; 19: 684-91.
study of Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. ASCO Edu- 26. Pectasides D, Visvikis A, Kouloubinis A, Glotsos J, Bountou-
cational Book, 2002, poster 1307. roglou N, Karvounis N, Ziras N, Athanassiou A. Weekly che-
14. Athanassiou AE, Potamianou A, Bountouroglou N, Ziras N, et motherapy with carboplatin, docetaxel and irinotecan in ad-
al. Methotrexate, etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MVIP): vanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. European
an effective firstline therapy for IGCCC intermediate/poor pro- Journal of Cancer 2002; 38(9): 1194-200.

. . , . , .

OOO O ,
O ,
- 70 ml/min/1,73 m2.

, --
, , - (D).
. - -
- , p -
. , ,
- . -
/ -
. .
,
OO
.

O (CDD)
O - .
,
. - . O
,
,
. 2,3. -
, 4 ( -
, -
. ). 25% 35% -
,
.
- -
. p - -
- .
. , -
, - .
. 5. -
-
(Glomerular Filtration Rate , -
GFR). O - . O
, -
(effective renal plasma flow)
. -
. - 6. 13 CDDP
2- ,

477
478 OY

. ,
- 5 .

7. 1223% , -
(GFR), - 14,15.
, - -
.
2- - -
. -
.
, , -
, - -
. - CDDP16.
, , -
110% 8. - , -
, -
- -
. , .

. - -
. -
10% - CDDP -
9. , -
O - .
. O - O CDDP
23 L 312
, CDDP,
. 23 L -
. -
10. , -
- ,
- 3 L/m2 ,
, - -
, - . -
, 17, -
11.
CDDP. 24 CDDP -
(.. ). -
cis , 18.
- -
D12. O - CDDP -
, (sodium thiosulfate)
D - ,
12. - CDDP.
, F-,
13. - 19,20.
IV CDDP -
, . ,
.
- -
-
VII. 479


21,22. .
, , - ,
, 29. -
, -
, .
23. - .

O (ASCO) - -
- .
24. - -
- .
,
- O OO

. (C)
30, -
, - Coggins 1959. -
24. 10% -
- , 40%
-
25. . O -
- 31. -
, -
. - 4--
- , -
, - -
, ,
(Area Under the Curve AUC). , ,
- . -
, - -
26-28. -
. , ,

. .
-
CDDP. - , , ,
(IV) - .
, - -
. ,
,
, , -
( SIAD)32.
. -
.
12
- 24 ,
. -
55% . SIAD
, 27% 60 ,
ml/min. -
480 OY

33. S
100 - . -
, 45% -
, 43% 78% - GM-CSF 40.
, 5% - O S-
. 100% (. , -
1 1 40% ) -
2 8 16% . .
30. -
, - SIAD ,
- -
. -
- .
- -
41.
. , -

-
/

. -
.
- , 2,
, ,
F2, , -
-
, . -
Fanconi.
, ,
34-36. -
- 42. -
II,
, . - I, , , -
- , , -
, . .
- 43 (
- ).

. 100
O Brock et al 37, - g/m2.
, , -
ESNA.
, 2-merca- , -
ptoethane sulfonate (S). .
- 45.
, S , 4 S
,
. S -
, -
. .
-
- BO
,
S, ,
S -
38,39. -
VII. 481

, 11,5 g/m2 49.


. -
p .
- O
. -
.
(intrarenal obstructive
nephrpathy). -
50.
, - 51.
- -
- (CCNU), (BCNU)
. (menthyl-CCNU).

.
,
19 g/m2, ,
46.
1,5 g/m2.
-
OTIKA
-
C -
.
52.
-

O ( -
100 mg , 6
) -
. -
. -
-
, -
. < 4 10-7 48 ,
,
, - , , -
< 2,5 10-8 . 53. -
- ,
14 21 47, -
, - IgG -
. 54. -
, -
-
- .
, , -
. ,
40% .
OOIE
- 250500 g/kg
. 5 .
-
48 AOPA KYTTAPOTOIKA APMAKA
. -

, , , - (SIADH)55. 5--
, . - ,
, . -
- .
482 OY

, - . -
, , ,
. - (mg/mg) -
. 1. -
-
, -
.
, 61.
, -
1 mg/kg 3 5 , .
. , ( -
meCCNU VP) .
56. - , -
, - .
. 23 , -
1.200 mg/m2 meCCU . ,
- - 62.
. , -
, -
57. . /
- 63.
, , -
. OO OO
-2 (IL-2) capil- ,
lary leak syndrome ( ) -
58. ,
Burkit
. . -
(IFN-) -
. - .
59.
, Rituximab , , -
, 64.
,
CD2060. -
,
O O O OO O 24 -
- .
. -
-
, . -
- , .
, -
. - (Fasrutec),
- -
Burkit - .
.
. ,
, , . -
- G-6-PD.
VII. 483

, - OOO O O
, - O
6 mq/dl, - -
> 10 -
mg/dl. -
(. 1 2).

1.


-D
5-



,
6-

6-

2.

GFR
3060 ml/min 1030 ml/min <10 ml/min

50%
Calvert
150% 100% 75%
50%
75% 75% 50%
75% 75% 50%

75% 75% 50%
- 100% ( ) 50% 2550%
100% 0,75 mg/m2 ?
100% 75% 50%

CCNU 100% 50% 20%
100% 75% 50%
50% , > 60 mg/dl > 1,5 mg/dl.
Av CrCl < 40 ml/min:

1. Reed WE, Sabatini S. The use of drugs in renal failure. Semin 5. Patterson WP, Reams GR. Renal and electrolyte abnormali-
Nephrol 1986; 6: 259-295. ties due to chemotherapy. In: Perry MC, ed. The Chemothera-
2. Dangaard G, Abildgaard U. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity. A review. py Source book. Baltimore M.D.: Williams and Wilkins, 1991:
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989; 25: 1-9. 648-667.
3. Fillaster JP, Raquenez-Viotte G. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity. To- 6. Groth S, Nielsen H, Sorensen JB, et al. Acute and long term
xicol Lett 1989; 46: 163-175. nephrotoxicity of cis-platinum in man. Cancer chemother Phar-
4. Watson PR, Guthrie TH, Caruana RJ. Cisplatin associated macol 1986; 18: 276-279.
hemolytic-uremic syndrome successful treatment with a sta- 7. Hansen SW, Groth S, Dangaard G, et al. Long term effects of
phylococcal protein A column. Cancer 1989; 64: 1400-1403. renal function and blood pressure of treatment with cisplatin,
484 OY

vinblastine, and bleomycin in patients with germ cell cancer. J 25. Heyman SN, Spokes K, Egorin MJ, Epstein FH. Glycine redu-
Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 1728-1731. ces early renal parenchymal uptake of cisplatin. Kidney Int
8. Schilsky RL, Anderson T. Hypomagnesemia and renal magne- 1993 Jun; 43 (6): 1226-8.
sium wasting in patients receiving cisplatin. Ann Intern Med 26. Preiss R, Brovtsyn VK, Perevodchikova NF, et al. Effect of
1979; 90: 929-931. methotrexate and the pharmacokinetics and renal excretion of
9. Hutchison FN, Perez EA, Gandara DR, et al. Renal salt wast- cisplatin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 34: 139-144.
ing in patients treated with cisplatin. Ann Intern Med 1988; 27. Goren MP, Wright RK, Horowitz ME, et al. Enhancement of
108: 21-25. methotrexate nephrotoxicity after cisplatin therapy. Cancer
10. Leibbrandt ME, Wolfgang GH, Metz AL, Ozobia AA, Has- 1986; 58: 2617-2621.
kins JR. Critical subcellular targets of cisplatin and related pla- 28. Goren MP, Wright RK, Pratt CB, et al. Potential of ifosfamide
tinum analogs in rat renal proximal tubule cells. Kidney Int neurotoxicity, hematoxicity and tubular nephrotoxicity by prior
1995 Sep; 48(3): 761-70. CDDP therapy. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 1457-1460.
11. Gordon JA, Gattone VH. Mitochondrial alteration in cisplatin 29. Canetta R, Goodlow J, Smaldone L, et al. Pharmacologic cha-
-induced renal failure. Am J Phys 1986; 250: 911-998. racteristics of carboplatin: Clinical experience. In: Bunn P Jr,
12. Liu H, Baliga R. Cytochrome P450 2El null mice provide novel Canetta R, Ozols R, Rozencweig M. Carboplatine. New York:
protection against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and apo- W.B. Saunders, 1990: 19-38.
ptosis. Kidney Int 2003 May; (6395): 1687-96. 30. Stillwell TJ, Benson RC. Cyclophosphamide induced hemorr-
13. Megyesi J, Safirstein RL, Price PM. Induction of p21WAFI/ hagic cystitis. Cancer 1988; 61: 451-457.
ClPl/SDll in kidney tubule cells affects the course of cisplatin 31. Brock N, StekarJ, Pohl J, et al. Acrolein, the causative factor
induced renal failure. J Clin Invest 1998 Feb 15; 101(4): 777-82. of urotoxic side effects of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, tro-
14. Kelsen DP, Alock N, Young LW. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity-cor- phospharine and sufosfamide. Arzuein Forsch 1979; 29: 659-
relation with plasma platinum concentrations. Am J Clin On- 661.
col 1985; 8: 77-80. 32. Bressler RB, Huston DP. Water intoxication following mode-
15. Delay-Yates PT, McBrien DCH. Cisplatin metabolites in pla- rate-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arch Intern Med
sma, a study of their pharmacokinetics and importance in the 1985; 145: 548-549.
nephrotoxicity and antitumor activity of cisplatin. Biochem 33. Bode V, Seif SM, Lerine AS. Studies on the antidiuretic effect
Pharmacol 1984; 33: 3030-3070. of cyclophosphamide; Vasopressin release and sodium excre-
16. Hrushesky WJ, Shimp W, Kennedy BJ. Lack of age-dependent tion. Cancer 1988; 61: 451-457.
cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Am J Med 1984; 76: 579-584. 34. Klein FA, Smith MIV. Urinary complications of cyclophospha-
17. Ozols RF, Corden B, Jacob J, et al. High-dose cisplatin in hy- mide therapy. Etiology, prevention and management. South
pertonic saline. Ann Intern Med 1984; l00: 19-24. Med J 1983; 76: 1413-1416.
18. Devine SM, Vokes EE. Infusional cisplatin and carboplatin: 35. Jerkins GR, Noe HN, Hill D. Treatment of complication of cy-
Recent clinical experience and a review. J Infus Chemother clophosphamide cystitis. J Urol 1988; 139: 923-925.
1991; 1: 2836. 36. Mohiuddin J, Prentice HG, Scley S, et al. Treatment of cyclo-
19. Pfeijle CE, Howell SB, Felthouse RD, et al. High-dose cispla- phosphamide-induced cystitis with prostaglandin E2. Ann In-
tin with sodium thiosulfate protection. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: tern Med 1984; 101: 142.
237-244. 37. Brock N. Uromitexan (mesna)-concept and mode of action.
20. Abe R, Akioyoshi T, Koba F, et al. Two-rout-chemotherapy Beltrage zur Onkologie 1980; 5: 1-11.
using intra-arterial cisplatin and intravenous sodium thiosulfa- 38. Hows JM, Mehta A, Ward L, et al. Comparison of MESNA
te, its neutralizing agent, for hepatic malignancies. Eur J Can- with forced diuresis to prevent cyclophosphamide-induced he-
cer Clin Oncol 1988; 24: 1671-1674. morrhagic cystitis in marrow transplantation: A prospective ran-
21. Markman M, Clearly S, Howell SB. Nephrotoxicity of high-do- domized study. Br J Cancer 1984; 50: 753-756.
se intracavitary cisplatin with thiosulfate protection. Eur J 39. Shepherd JD, Pringle LE, Barnett MJ, et al. MESNA versus
Cancer Clin Oncol 1985; 21: 1015-1018. hyperhydration for the prevention of cyclophosphamide-in-
22. Fountzilas G, Dombros N, Balaskas E, et al. Intraperitoneal duced hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow transplantation. J
chemotherapy with high-dose cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 2016-2020.
patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Reg Cancer Treat 40. Vela-Ojeda J, Tripp-Villanueva F, Sanchez-Cortes E, Ayal
1989; 2: 203-209. Sanchez M, Garcia-Ruiz-Esparza MA, Rosas-Cabral A, Gon-
23. Castiglione F, Dalla Mola A, Porcile G. Protection of normal zalez-Laven J. Intravesical rhGM-CSF for the treatment of
tissues from radiation and cytotoxic therapy: the development late onset hemorrhagic cystitis after bone marrow transplan-
of amifostine. Tumori 1999 Mar-Apr; 85(2): 85-91. tation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 Dec; 24(12): 1307-10.
24. Schuchter LM, Hensley ML, Meropol NJ, Winer EP. 2002 up- 41. Finn G, Denning D. Transient nephrogenic diabetes insipidus
date of recommendations for the use of chemotherapy and ra- following high-dose cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and au-
diotherapy protectants: Clinical practice guidelines of the A- tologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Treat Rep 1987;
merican Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2002 Jun 71: 220-221.
15; 20 (12): 2895-903. 42. Patterson WP, Knojasteh A. lfosfamide-induced renal tubular
VII. 485

defects. Cancer 1988; 63: 649-651. 54. Price TM, Murgo AJ, Keveney JJ, et al. Renal failure and he-
43. Dubourg L, Michoudet C, Cochat P, Baveral G. Human kid- molytic anemia associated mitomycin-C. Cancer 1985; 55: 51-
ney tubules detoxify chloroacetaldehyde, a presumed nephro- 56.
toxic metabolite of ifosfamide. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 Aug; 55. Cutting HO. Inappropriate secretion of and diuretic hormone
12(8): 1615-23. secondary to vincristine therapy. Am J Med 1971; 51: 269-271.
44. Goren MP, Wright PK, Horowitz ME, et al. lfosfamide-induc- 56. Kramer RA, Boyd MR, Dees JH. Comparative nephrotoxicity
ed subclinical tubular nephrotoxicity despite mesna. Cancer of MeCCNU and chlorozototicin Functional-Structural corre-
Treat Rep 1987; 71: 127-130. lations in the Fisher 344 rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986; 82:
45. Pratt CB, Meyer WH, Jenkins JJ, et al. lfosfamide Fanconis 540-550.
syndrome and rickets. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1495-1499. 57. Slavin RE, Dias MA, Saral R. Cytosine-arabinoside induced
46. Hande KR, Donehower RC, Chabuer BA. Pharmacology and gastrointestinal toxic alteration in sequential chemotherapeu-
pharmacokinetics of high dose methotrexate in man. In: Clini- tic protocols. A clinical pathological study of 33 patients. Can-
cal pharmacology of Antineoplastic drugs. New York: HM Pi- cer 1978; 42: 1747-1759.
medo et Elserier/North Holland, 1978. 58. Guleria AS, Yang JC, Topalian SL, Weber JS, Parkinson DR,
47. Abefson HT, Fosburg MT, Beardsfey GP, et al. Methotrexate MacFarlane MP, White RL, Steinberg SM, White DE, Ein-
induced renal impairment: clinical studies and rescue from sy- horn JH, et al. Renal disfunction associated with the admini-
stemic toxicity with high-dose leucovorin and thymidine. J Clin stration of high-dose interleukin-2 in 199 consecutive patients
Oncol 1983; 3: 208-216. with metastatic melanoma or renal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol
48. Meyerowitz RL, Sartiano GP, Cavaff T. Nephrotoxic and cyto- 1994 Dec; 12(12): 2714-22.
proliferative effects of streptozotocin. Cancer 1916; 38: 1550- 59. Selby P, Kohn J, Raymond J, Judson J, McElwain T. Nephro-
1555. tic syndrome during treatment with interferone. Br Med J
49. Sadoff L. Nephrotoxicity of streptozotocin (NSC 85998). Can- (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Apr 20; 290(6476): 1180.
cer chemother Rep 1970; 54: 457-459. 60. Yang H, Rosove MH, Figlin RA. Tumor lysis syndrome occur-
50. Tobin MV, Warenius HM, Morris AJ. Forced diuretics to re- ring after the administration of rituximab in lymphoproliferati-
duce nephrotoxicity of streptozotocin in the treatment of ad- ve disorders: high grade non-Hodgkins lymphoma and chronic
vanced metastatic insulinoma. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1128, let- lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol 1999 Dec; 62(4): 247-50.
ter. 61. Presant CA, Denes AE, Klein L, et al. Phase I and preliminary
51. Defaney V, de Petuz Y, Nixon D, et al. Indomethacin in stre- phase II observations of high-dose intermittent 6-Thioguanine.
ptozotocin-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Am J Kid- Cancer Treat Rep 1980; 64: 1109-1113.
ney Dis 1987; 9: 79-83. 62. Perry MC, Hoagland HC, Wagoner RD. Uric acid nephropa-
52. Arbus M, Wooffey PV, Chiazze L, et al. Cancer assonated he- thy. JAMA 1976; 236: 961-962.
molytic-uremic syndrome: Analysis of 85 cases from a national 63. Gelbart DR, Weinstein AB, Fajardo LF. Allopurinol induced
registry. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 781-789. nephritis. Ann Intern Med 1977; 86: 197-198.
53. Liu K, Mittefman A, Sprouf EE, et al. Renal toxicity in man 64. Cohen LFO, Balow JE, Magrath IT, et al. Acute tumor lysis
treated with mitomycin-C. Cancer 1971; 28: 1314-1320. syndrome. Am J Med 1980; 68: 486-491.

L-
,
- .
. O
, , . O
58% 33%
-D,
1. /
. -
10% -
() -
.
-
Gell Coombs (. 3). . -
- -
- ,
-
. 4 - .
O
. Gell
486 OY

3. Coombs Gell

I O, , , , IgE , ,
, , , , ,

II

III
-
V , , -


4. O -
- (axl), -
, 30% ,
1. L- 9.
12 ,
2. , 10. , (3%). O -
3. , Cremophor,
4. 11. 5- . O
5. 12.
6. - 13.
,
7. 14.
8. -
6, -
10 15
Coombs. 1
- . O -
, , , , -
, , , - . -
, , , - -
, . O ,
, 7. O -
- , . -
2. O -
gE . . -
IgG IgM - -
. Cremofor -
3,4. 10 .
Cremofor (-
- , , , , ),
- .
, 5. -
L-- ,
, scherichia Coli Erwinia chrysanthe- .
mia. - Cremofor
- .
scherichia Coli
Erwinia . - (Taxotere)
-
polysorbate 80.
.
VII. 487

. : , ,
20 mg p.., 12 6
, 1 ,
2 IV, 30 . - . -
: 20 mg IV, 30 14.
1 28,9. - 1027%
: 8 mg -
3 , 24 - .
. - .
- -
(capillary leak syndrome). -


, -
- . O -
. 10 ,
ellie et al , .
33% ,
I. III - . -
14% . - 313% 15. O -
, -
16. , -
, , ..17.
mg . O - ,
. - .

. , - -
- O
. - - (ra-C). ,
gE -
. . -
polysorbate (ween) 80 . O -
Cremophor , . , ,
, , . -
. gE . -
- -
11. - -
, .
60 - -
1 . - , , , , -
, - ( --
- ).
12. 18. -
,

- -.
, , -
. - 20%. --
- -
18%13. , . ,
-
. (hand-foot syndrome), -
488 OY

-. O - , , -
.
- IV .
, 5-FU, - (flare)
. - , ,
-. - -
19. - 22. ,
, -
. . -
- -
. .
- -
, ,
, -
23. O -
. -
.


. O V.
IgE .
. O -
20 . I
.
,
, , , - S (2-mercaptoethane sulpho-
-
nate).
.
IV -
, 5060% -
-
. - .
-
. - . 1% -
-
, -
, -
, (> 40C)
-
, -
-
,
.
24,25. -
, trimetrexate,
-
edatrexate pritrexim, -
26. -
I ,

,
. -
.
-
, , -
, . -
. -
. - -
- . ,
non ,
IgE 21.
. - .
VII. 489


1. . Stevens-Johnson . . Cetuximab.

, -
- , -
, . - . , -
(), - Stevens-Johnson
(, - (. 1) , -
). O - 1 13 -
- ,
-. O III30.
30 2 . O - 50.000/L,
, - -
27. .
Trastuzumab: 2040% - Gemtuzumab, Alemtu-
28. zumab Cetuximab (. 1)
, , , , - Rituximab -
- 31,32.
. -
, .
, - 24%
, - ,
. . -
Rituximab: (50%) - .
, -
, , , , , , .
. 10% - .
, - -
RDS, , -,
, 29. -
. .
- ,
, -
. .
,
B-. .
Rituximab , , -
. , -
490 OY

IV
. -
( ). .
, -
, . , -
20 mg 12 , 6
POH H
- 50 mg .
,
, . .

1. Dellinger CT, Miale TD. Comparison or anaphylactic rea- mas following surgery. A southwest Oncology Group report. J
ctions to asparaginase derived from Escherichia Coli and Er- Neurooncol 1983; 1: 171-177.
winia cultures. Cancer 1976; 38: 1843-1846. 14. Wiess R. Hypersensitivity reactions. Seminars in Oncology
2. Evans TE, Tsialis A, Rivera G, et al. Anaphylactoid reactions 1992; 19 (5): 458-477.
to Escherichia Coli and Erwinia asparaginase in children with 15. Thomas RR, Quinn MG, Schuler B, Grem JL. Hypersensitivi-
leukemia and lymphoma. Cancer 1982; 49: 1378-1383. ty and idiosyncratic reactions to oxaliplatin. Cancer 2003 May
3. Khan A, Hil JM. Atopic hypersensitivity to L-asparaginase re- 1; 97(9): 2301-7.
sistance to immunosuppresion. Int Arch Allergy 1971; 40: 463- 16. Tournigand C, Maindrault-Goebel F, Louvet C, de Gramont
469. A, Krulik M. Severe anaphylactic reactions to oxaliplatin. Eur
4. Fabry U, Korholz D, Jurgens H, et al. Anaphylaxis to L-aspa- J Cancer 1998 Jul; 34(8): 1297-8.
raginase during treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia 17. Brandi G, Pantaleo MA, Galli C, Falcone A, Antonuzzo A,
in children. Evidence of a complement-mediated mechanism. Mordenti P, Di Marco MC, Biasco G. Hypersensitivity rea-
Pediatr Res 1985; 19: 400-408. ctions to oxaliplatin. Br J Cancer 2003 Aug 4; 89(3): 477-81.
5. Beard MEJ, Crowther D, Gallon AG, et al. L-asparaginase in 18. Duane SR, Peterson BA, Hurd DD, et al. Cytarabine induced
treatment of acute leukemia and lymphosarcoma. Br Med J hypotension. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1984; 3: 98 (abstr).
1970; 1: 191-195. 19. Herzing RH, Wolj SN, Lazarus HM, et al. High-dose cytosine
6. Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiemik PH, Ohnuma T, Gralla arabinoside therapy for refractory leukemia. Blood 1983; 62:
RJ, Trump DL, Baker JR, Van Echo DA, Vin Hoff DD, Ley- 361-369.
land-Jones B. Hypersensitivity reactions from Taxol. J Clin 20. Sostman HD, Matthay RA, Puttman CE, et al. Methotrexate
Oncol 1990 Jul; 8(7): 1263-8. induced pneumonitis. Medicine 1976; 55: 371-388.
7. Price KS, Castells MC. Taxol Reactions. Allergy Asthma Proc 21. Chanan-Khan A, Szebeni J, Savay S, liebes L, Rafique NM,
2002 May-Jun; 23(3): 205-8. Alving CR, Muggia FM. Complement activation following
8. Gennari A, Salvadori B, Tognoni A, Conte PF. Rapid intrave- first exposure to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: possible ro-
nous premedication with dexamethasone prevents hypersensi- le in hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Oncol 2003 Sep; 14(9):
tivity reactions to paclitaxel. Ann Oncol 1996 Nov; 7(9): 978-9. 1430-7.
9. Kwon JS, Elit L, Finn M, Hirte H, Mazurka J, Moens F, Trim 22. Vogelang NJ. Adriamycin flare. A skin reaction resembling
K. A comparison of two prophylactic regimens for hypersensi- extravasation. Cancer Treat Rep 1979; 63: 2067-2069.
tivity reactions to paclitaxel. Gynecol Oncol 2002 Mar; 84(3): 23. Krutchik AN, Budzar AV, Tashima CK. Cyclophosphamide
420-5. induced urticaria. Occurrence in a patient with no cross-sensi-
10. Kellie SJ, Crist WM, Pui C-H, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions tivity to chlorambucil. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138: 1725-1726.
to epipodophylotoxins in children with acute lymphoblastic 24. Carter JJ, McLaughlin ML, Bern MM. Bleomycin-induced fa-
leukemia. Cancer 1991; 67: 1070-1075. tal hyperpyrexia. Am J Med 1983; 74: 523-525.
11. Eschalier A, Lavarenee J, Burtin C, Renoux M, Chapuy E, 25. Ma DDF, sbister JP. Cytotoxic-induced fulminant hyperpyre-
Rodriguez M. Study of histamine release induced by acute ad- xia. Cancer 1980; 45: 2249-2251.
ministration of antitumor agents in dogs. Cancer Chemother 26. Dinarello CA, Ward SB, Wolff SM. Pyrogenic properties of
Pharmacol 1988; 21(3): 246-50. bleomycin. Cancer chemotherapy Rep 1973; 57: 393-398.
12. Tester WJ, Cohn JB, Fleekop PD, Rabinowitz MS, Lieberman 27. Dillman RO, Hendrix CS. Unique aspects of supportive care
JS. Successful rechallenge to etoposide after an acute vasomo- using monoclonal antibodies in cancer treatment. Support can-
tor response. J Clin Oncol 1990 Sep; 8(9): 1660-1. cer Ther 2003; 1: 38.
13. Eyre HJ, Quaglina JM, Eltringham JR, et al. Randomized 28. Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN,
comparisons of radiotherapy and CCNU versus radiotherapy, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burch-
CCNU plus procarbazine for the treatment of malignant glio- more M, Shak S, Stewart SJ, Press M. Efficacy and safety of
VII. 491

trastuzumab as a single agent in first line treatment of HER2- B, Dombret H, Karanes C, Theobald M, Bennet JM, Sherman
overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002 ML, Berger MS, Eten CB, Loken MR, van Dongen JJ, Bern-
Feb 1; 20(3): 719-26. stein ID, Appelbaum FR. Efficacy and safety of gemtuxumab
29. Plosker GL, Figgitt DP. Rituximab: a review of its use in non ozogamicin in patients with CD-33 positive acute myeloid leu-
Hodgkins lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Drugs kemia in first relapse. J Clin Oncol 2001 Jul 1; 19(13): 3244-54.
2003; 63(8): 803-43. 32. Keating MJ, Flinn , Jain V, Binet JL, Hillmen P, Byrd J, Albi-
30. DArcy CA, Mannik M. Serum sickness secondary to treat- tar M, Brettman L, Santabarbara P, Wacker B, Rai KR. The-
ment with the murine-human chimeric antibody IDEC-C2B8 rapeutic role of alemtuzumab (Campath-lH) in patients who
(rituximab). Arthritis Rheum 2001 Jul; 44(7): 1717-8. failed fludarabine: results of a large international study. Blood
31. Sievers EL, Larson RA, Stadtmauer EA, Estey E, Lowenberg 2002 May 15; 99(10): 3554-61.

OO OO , ,
, ,
. ,
- .
, , - 710
, , 1
- 2 .
(GVHD).
- , -
, , - , -
, , , .
. -
2,3.
I /4.
, , -
5. O . O
(. 2) - -
. -
- .
- 50%, -
. - -
5,6.
2% -

. 50 , -
- 7. -

5. -


CU




-
-D

2. IV

.
492 OY

. 6 -
, - .
, . -

E O EO Addison8.
- ( ) S
(. 3). C .
- . -
.
.
6.
-
, ,
-D, -

-
-D

. 5% 5-

-
(. 4).

, -

. -

3. - 4. 5-
. .
VII. 493

5. - 6. .
.

, -
, 11. , -
. -
. 11. -
, - ,
, 5-, , , - . -
, , , -
, , - .
- (- -
), , -
. - (. 6). -
, , - . O -
ees, uehrcke,
(. 5). . -
- .
, -
A OOI
- O -
. ima- : 1. -
tinib , 2. , 3. , 4.
9. - .
, -
-
. -
.
OY -
- , -
- -
12.
10 . 7 8.
, ,
- -
10. O Beau - -

494 OY

.
7. -
-

13. 8
-D
.


-
.
, -
. , -
, 6- -
8. - -
14. -
.

-D I O

-
-

6%.
,
, -
, . O
, -
, , -
,
(. 8). O

, ,
, -
, -
-
. -
-
7. -
. , CU .

. ,
, -
.
(. 7)

. -
,

,
,
, .
-
,
, -
. - 8. -
, , , - .
VII. 495

-
9.
-
,
11 . -

-


,
-D DMSO - -
. -
,
. O -
, ,
, -, , -
Q, , ,
-15-19.
, -

-
.
, -

DSO --

, ,
9. -
-D, CU20. -
. -
21.
, , -

9.
- -
,
710 - ,
, , , - . -
( ). -
23 - 24 -
. - . -
. 10 mg (IV, )
, - ,
. - -
, - . -
- ,
. - GM-CSF -
.
, - dexrazoxane (1.000 mg , 1.000 mg
(. 9). 500 mg )23. -
DMSO24 -
M 14 -
, -
. - . -
, -
D 18.
. -
496 OY

10. Hickman.

19 (300
IV 2 ml )
,
25.
(15 , 15 -
, 24 ). -
-
, ,
23.
-
,
23 -
,
11.
. O .

.
), -, (-
- ) (. 11).
, - , -
, - , -
. -
,
. - (desquamation).
. , - , ( -
Hickman (. 10) - ) ,
. - 26. --
- -
. ,
,
. 27. O
. -
. ,
, -
YOO -O (35%) -
- GVHD.
(60%), ( - 35 . -
VII. 497

- 11. -
.
,

- . -

-
, - -
.
28.

OI

29,30 -
-
(UV) (. 10). O . -
.
UV
OOH I
tegafur -

31.
,
32. O - . -
--
, , - , -
. 33 (. 11). O 2 -
- -
. - . -
. - , -
- .
UV . - .
, 2 ,
. - 34.
.
O - -
. .
. - -
- - 35.
. -
2 5 - (O) -
UV , ().
O -
10.
36.

.

O A
5- L-2
Tegafur .
-D
-

1 3 -
2 37.
IFN- , -
. -


498 OY

12.

- Stevens-Johnson
/ TEN


Tegafur -D






-



38. , Imatinib me-


sylate, gefinitib cetuximab - 40.
, - -
- ,
39, - -
. - (. 12).

1. Crounse RCr, Van Scott EJ. Changes in scalp hair roots as a 11. Singh M, Kaur S. Chemotherapy-induced multiple Beans li-
measure of toxicity from cancer chemotherapeutic drugs. J In- nes. Int J Dermatol 1986; 25: 590-591.
vest Dermatol 1960; 35: 83-90. 12. Phillips TL, Fu KF. Acute and late effects of multimodal the-
2. Ganci L, Servon B. Changes in hair pigmentation associated rapy on normal tissues. Cancer 1977; 40: 489-494.
with cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep 1980; 64: 103. 13. DAnglo GJ, Farber S, Maddock CL. Potentiation of x-ray ef-
3. Lonveiro C, Gill PS, Ravick M, et al. Red hair and hypepig- fect by actinomycin D. Radiology 1959; 73: 175-177.
mentation in a black man after chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 14. Falkson G, Shulz EJ. Skin changes in patients treated with 5-
1987; 5: 1705-1706. fluorouracil. Br J Dermatol 1962; 74: 229-236.
4. Dean JC, Salmon SE, Griffith KS. Prevention of doxorubicin- 15. Garnick M, Israel M, Khetarpaf V, Luce J. Persistance of an-
induced hair loss with scalp hypothermia. N Engl J Med 1979; thracyclines levels following dermal and subcutaneous adria-
301: 1427-1429. mycin extravasation. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1981; 22: 173.
5. Baker B, Wilson C, Davis A, et al. Busulfanlcyclophoshamide 16. Okano T, Ohnuma T, Efremidis A, Holland JF. Doxorubicin-
conditioning for bone marrow transplantation may lead to fai- induced skin ulcer in the piglet. Cancer Treat Rep 1983; 67:
lure of hair regrowth. Bone marrow transplant 1991; 7-437. 1075-1078.
6. Witman G, Cadman E, Chen M. Misuse of scalp hypothermia. 17. Desai MH, Teres D. Prevention of doxorubicin-induced skin
Cancer Treat Rep 1981; 65: 507-508. ulcers in the rat and pig, with dimethyl sulfoxide CDMSO.
7. Duvic M, Lemak N, Valero V, et al. A randomized trial of mi- Cancer Treat Rep 1982; 66: 1371-1374.
noxidil in chemotherapy induced alopecia. J Am Acad Derma- 18. Svingen BA, Powis G, Appel PL, Scott M. Protection against
tol 1996; 35; 74 8. adriamycin-induced skin necrosis in the rat by dimethyl sulfo-
8. Harrold BP. Syndrome resembling Addisons disease follow- xide and a-tocoferol. Cancer Res 1981; 41: 3395-3399.
ing prolonged treatment with busulfan. Br Med J 1966; 1: 463- 19. Dorr RT, Alberts DS, Stone A. Cold protection and heat en-
464. hancement of doxorubicin skin toxicity in the mouse. Cancer
9. Tsao AS, Kantarjan H, Cortes J, OBrien S, Talpaz M. Imati- Treat Rep 1985; 69: 341-347.
nib mesylate causes hypopigmentation in the skin. Cancer 2003 20. Harwood KY, Bachur N. Evaluation of dimethyl sulfoxide and
Dec 1; 98(11): 2483-7. local cooling as antidotes for doxorubicin extravasation in a
10. James WD, Odom RB. Chemotherapy-induced transverse pig model. Oncol Nurs Forum 1987; 14: 39-44.
white lines in the fingernails. Arch Dermatol 1983; 119: 334- 21. Rentschler R, Wilbur D. Pyridoxine a potential local antidote
335. for mitomycin-C extravasation. J Surg Oncol 1988; 37: 269-271.
VII. 499

22. Shamseddine AI, Khalil AM, Kibbi AG, et al. Granulocyte 32. Guzzo C, Kaidby K. Reccurent recall of sunburn by methotre-
macrophage-colony stimulating factor for treatment of chemo- xate. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1995 Apr; 11
therapy extravasation. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 1998; 19: 47981. (2): 55-6.
23. Langer SW, Sehesed M, Jensen PB, Buter J, Giaccone G. Dex- 33. Margolis DJ, Gross PR. Neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis: a
razoxane in anthracycline extravasation. J Clin Oncol 2000 Aug; case report and a review of the literature. Cutis 1991 Sep; 48
18(16): 3004. (3): 198-200.
24. Parashos PS. A rational approach for the management of tissue 34. Bernstein EF, Spielvogel RL, Topolsky DL. Reccurent neutro-
extravasation due to antineoplastic drugs. Micro Link 1986; 2: philic hidradenitis. Br Dermatol 1992 Nov; 127(5): 529-33.
13-15. 35. Brehler R, Reimann S, Bonsmann G, Metze D. Neutrophilic
25. Dorr RT. Antidotes to vesicant chemotherapy extravasations. hidradenitis induced by chemotherapy involves eccrine and a-
Blood Rev 1990; 4: 41-60. pocrine glands. Am J Dermatopathol 1997; 19: 73-78.
26. Dem. Ircay Z, Gurbuz O, Alpdogan T, et al. Chemotherapy in- 36. Hurt MA, Halvorson RD, Petr FC Jr, et al. Eccrine squamous
duced acral erythema in leukemic patients: a report of 15 ca- syringometaplasia. A cutaneous sweat gland reaction in the hi-
ses. Int J Dermatol 1997; 36: 5938. stologic spectrum of chemotherapy associated eccrine hidrade-
27. Hellier I, Bessis D, Sotto A, at al. High-dose methotrexate in- nitis and neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis. Arch Dermatol 1990;
duced bullous variant of acral erythema. Arch Dermatol 1996; 126: 73-7.
132: 590 1. 37. Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O, Wechler J, et al. Cutaneous side
28. Vukelja SJ, Baker WJ, Burris HA, et al. Pyridoxine therapy for effects associated with IL2 administration for metastatic mela-
palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia associated with taxotere. J noma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28: 66-70.
Nation Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1432. 38. Gooptu C, Littlewood TJ, Frith P, et al. Paraneoplastic pem-
29. Alley E, Green R, Schuchter L. Cutaneous toxicities of cancer phigus. An association with fludarabine? Br J Dermatol 2001;
therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2002 Mar; (1492): 212-6. 144: 1255-6.
30. De Spain JD. Dermatologic toxicity of chemotherapy. Semin 39. Brouard M, Saurat JH. Cutaneus reactions to STI 571 (letter).
Oncol 1992 Oct; 19(50): 501-7. N Eng J Med 2001; 345: 618-9.
31. Fujimoto M, Kikuchi K, Imakado S, Furue M. Photosensitivity 40. Bunn PA Jr, Franklin W. Epidermal growth factor receptor ex-
dermatitis induced by flutamide. Br J Dermatol 1996 Sep; 135 pression, signal pathway, and inhibitors in non small cell lung
(3): 496-7. cancer. Semi Oncol 2002 Oct; 29 (5 Suppl 140): 38-4.

OO OO RAYNAUD
-
1977.
1. 40% -
- , -
, PV (, , )2,3,4.
, . O -
,

, . -
-
, -
, -
, . -
. -
-

.
, -
- 10
. 18 , ,
. -
, - .
- Raynaud -
- .
. O - -
, , -
(. 13). .
500 OY

OOH OO O O
13. -
1973.
, -
Raynaud
Budd-Chiari. -

-
,
CNU Budd-Chiari
. 21%


-
7 40%
.

(O)


5% 50%
CNU 8,9.
, DTIC, -,
, , ,
-
5-
CMF
VD -
Hodgkin, -
11.
(-
), -
L-

(95%), (50%) (20%). -
,
( )
CMF: , , 5-
PEB: , , .
, -
13, -
, C14, -
(-)15,.
- ,
. O - , .. -
-
. - III. -
VIII
. O , -
,
- -
Raynaud, . GVHD,
- , -
. - 12.
, - -
- -
. - . O
. - -
- .
- O
5,6. 50% .

.
VII. 501

. - (DIC).
12, , -
(V, HCV), (- -
), (, ,
B, ), , -
( .
),
, DLCO . -
- .
-
15, - -
, 16 - 24.
17. - -
. -
, -
18.
O - .
19 Defibrotide20. -
on Willebrand. -
VOD, - , -
. .
VOD
. Defibro- OH OOH OO
tide
, -
- 25. O
. 26. -
, 1, (-
, ) S. 215 . -
, -
750%12,21. - . RDS,
, , -
. .
-
OH OOA . -
10%. -
4 12 . 50%
, . T
. - , -
. - -
.
, PV . -
O 27.
-
. O - ,
, - -
, (BCNU),
, , - . O
, , -
, , , - .
23. -
502 OY

, , OO
. -

EI I A
29. -
I
.
(adjuvant) -
, , , - ,
, - 30,31. O
, - -
Raynaud28. .
, Hodgkin,
, ,
.
. , L-, ,
, , .
- -
. 7 . -
-
PV, 1 - .
. 100 32 -
- 28%.
. O - C33.

Raynaud, , CMF
. C S
VIII , -
, L-
. III.


1. Doll DC, Ringenberg QS, Yarbo JW. Vascular toxicity asso- and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer 1982; 49:
ciated with antineoplastic agents. J Clin Oncol 1985; 4: 1405- 1789-1795.
1417. 8. Ayash LJ, Hunt M, Antman K, Eder JP, et al. Hepatic veno-
2. Vogelzang NJ, Bosl GJ, Johnson K, et al. Raynauds phenom- occlusive disease in autologous bone marrow transplantation
enon. A common toxicity after combination chemotherapy for of solid tumors and lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 1990 Od: 8(10):
testicular cancer. Ann Intern Med 1981; 95: 288-292. 1699-706.
3. Fossa SD, Aass N, Kaalhus Q, et al. Long-term survival and 9. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Clift RA, et al. Veno-occlusive di-
morbidity in patients with metastatic malignant germ cell tu- sease of the liver and multiorgan failure after bone marrow
mors treated with cisplatin-based combinantion chemothera- transplantation: a cohort study of 355 patients. Ann Intern
py. Cancer 1986; 58: 2600-2605. Med Feb 15; 118(4): 255-67.
4. Hansen SW, Olsen N. Raynauds phenomenon in patients 10. Houghton AN, Shafi N, Rickles FR. Acute hepatic vein throm-
treated with cisplatin, vinblastine and bleomycin for germ cell bosis during therapy for Hodgkins disease: a case report. Ca-
cancer. Measurement of vasoconstirictor response to cold. J ncer 1979 Dec; 44(6): 2324-9.
Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 940-942. 11. Shulman HM, McDonald GB, Mattheus D, et al. An analysis
5. Malamet R, Wise RA, Ettinger WH, et al. Nifedipine in the of hepatic veno-occlusive disease and centrilobular hepatic de-
treatment of Raynauds phenomenon. Evidence for inhibition generation following bone marrow transplantation. Gastroen-
of platelet activation. Am J Med 1985; 78: 602-608. terology 1980; 79: 1178-1191.
6. Hantel A, Rowinsky EK, Donehower RL. Nifedipine and on- 12. McDonald GB, Sharma P, Matthews DE, et al. Veno-occlusi-
cologic Raynauds phenomenon. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: ve disease of the liver after bone marrow transplantation: Dia-
767 (Letter). gnosis, incidence, and predisposing factors. Hepatology 1984;
7. Lazarus HM, Gottfried MR, Herzing RH, et al. Veno-occlusi- 4: 116-122.
ve disease of the liver after high dose mitomycin C therapy 13. Heikiheimo M, Halila R, Fasth A. Serum procollagen type II
VII. 503

is an early and sensitive marker for veno-occlusive disease of 21. Beschomer WE, Pino J, Boitnott JK, et al. Pathology of the li-
the liver in children undergoing bone marrow transplantation. ver with bone marrow transplantation: Effects of busulfan, car-
Blood 1994 May 15; 83(10): 3036-40. mustine acute graft-versus-host disease and cytomegalovirus in-
14. Tabbara IA, Ghazal CD, Ghazal HH. Early drop in protein C fection. Am J Pathol 1980; 99: 369-386.
and antithrombin III is a predictor for the development of ve- 22. Gulati SC, Sordillo P, Kempin S, et al. Microangiopathic he-
no-occlusive disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem molytic anemia observed after treatment of epidermoid carci-
cell transplantation. J Hematother 1996 Feb; 5(1): 79-84. noma with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil. Cancer 1980; 45:
15a. Lee JH, Lee KH, Kim S, Lee JS, et al. Plasminogen activator 2252-2257.
inhibitor-I is an independed diagnostic marker as well as seve- 23. Lesesne JB, Rothschild N, Erickson B, et al. Cancer associated
rity predictor of hepatic veno-occlusive disease after allogeneic hemolytic uremic syndrome. Analysis of 85 cases from a Natio-
bone marrow transplantation in adults conditioned with busul- nal Registry. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 781-789.
fan and cyclophosphamide. Br J Haematol 2002 Sep; 118(4): 24. Hanna Wr, Krauss S, Regester RF, et al. Renal disease after
1087-94. mitomycin C-therapy. Cancer 1981; 48: 2583-2588.
15b. Attal M, Huguet F, Rubie H, Huynh A, Charlet JP, Payen JL, 25. Wagevoorr CA. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. Entity or
Voigt JJ, Brousset P, Selves J, Muller C, et al. Prevention of syndrome. Chest 1976; 69: 82-86.
veno-occlusive disease after bone marrow transplantation by 26. Rose AG. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease due to bleomycin
continuous infusion of low dose heparin: a prospective rando- therapy for lymphoma. S Afr Med 1983; 64: 636-638.
mized trial. Blood 1992 Jun 1; 79(11): 2834-40. 27. Waldhorn RE, Tson E, Smith EP, et al. Pulmonary veno-oc-
16. Essell JH, Schroeder MT, Harman GS, Thompson JM, et al. clusive disease associated with microangiopathic hemolytic a-
Ursodiol prophylaxis against hepatic complications of alloge- nemia and chemotherapy of gastric adenocarcinoma. Med Pe-
neic bone marrow transplantation. A randomized, double-blind, diatr Oncol 1984; 12: 394-396.
placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998 Jun 15; 128(12 28. Doll DC, List AF, Greco FA, et al. Acute arterial ischemic e-
Ptl): 975-81. vents following cisplatin-base combination chemotherapy for
17. Goringe AP, Brown S, OCallaghan U, Rees J, Jebb S, Elia M, germ cell tumors of the testis. Ann Inter Med 1986; 105: 48-51.
Poynton CH. Glutamine and Vit E in the treatment of hepatic 29. Sack GH, Levin J, Bell WR. Trousseaus syndrome and other
veno-occlusive disease following high-dose chemotherapy. Bo- manifestations of chronic disseminated coagulopathy in pa-
ne Marrow Transplant 1998 Apr; 21(8): 829-32. tients with neoplasms: Clinical, pathophysiologic and thera-
18. Fisher DC, Vredenburgh JJ, Petros Wp, Hussein A, Berry DA, peutic features. Medicine 1977; 56: 1-37.
Elkodry M, Rubin P, Gilbert CJ, Peters WP. Reduced mortali- 30. Saphner T, Tormey DC, Grap R. Venons and arterial throm-
ty following bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer bosis in patients who received adjuvant therapy for breast can-
with addition of peripheral blood progenitor cells is due to a cer. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 286-294.
marked reduction in veno-occlusive disease of the liver. Bone 31. Fisher B, Redmond C, Wickerham DL, et al. Doxorubicin-
Marrow Transplant 1998 Jan; 21(2): 117-22. containing regimens for the treatment of stage II breast can-
19. Hagglund H, Ringden O, Ericzon BG, et al. Treatment of cer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 575-582.
hepatic veno-occlusive disease with recombinant human tissue 32. Zangan M, Anaissie E, Barlogie B, et al. Increased risk of
plasminogen activator or orthotopic liver transplantation. Trans- deep-vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma re-
plantation 1996; 62: 1076-1080. ceiving thalidomide and chemotherapy. Blood 2001; 98: 1614-5.
20. Chopra R, Eaton JD, Grassi A, Potter M, Shaw B, Salat C, Fi- 33. Zangari M, Saghafifar F, Anaissie E, et al. Activated protein C
nazzi G, Lacobelli M, Bowyer K, Prentice HG, Barbui T. Defi- resistance in the absence of factor V Leiden mutation is a com-
brotide for the treatment of veno-occlusive disease: results of mon finding in multiple myeloma and is associated with an in-
the European compassionate-use study. Br J Haematol 2000 creased risk of thrombotic complications. Blood Coagul Fibri-
Dec; 111(4): 1122-9. nolysis 2002; 13: 187-92.

OOO O O- .
O O
-
14. -

,
, . 1.
- 2.
3.
, - 4.
, , 5.
, , 6.
7.
, -
504 OY

15.

+ + +/
+/ +
+/
+ +
- +/
-D +/
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ +
+
+/
+/ +
+
+
+
+ +
+
+ +

1%3. -
. - .

- -
. -
.
- Q , -
(. 14) - ( ) -
- .
(. 15). -

O OOO ( )4, -
()5, (-
)6,
(, , )7
( ), ( S-T, ,
, , - -
. - 8-10).

- -
- .
1,2. O , ( ), -
, , ( -
- ), -
. - . , 11 (opreleukin),
, - -
- ,
. - ,
.
VII. 505

-
- 2%28. -
. , -
, , - , -
11. - .
- 5 -
. - . 134
Robben et
, al29 33 -
.
123 - 5 -
, - .
80160 mg/m2. - -
-
- 90%. O
12. .
,
12. 30. -
O -
- Prinzmental28,31. -
, Ca++,
(90120 mg/kg).
, 27,32.
( 69 716 - -
13,14). -
-, .
-D
,
-
15-17.
- ,
- .
, . , -
- -
. - .
- -2
- , 33. -
. (
)
-
, -
- . -
. , , .
- -
, - -
18-20, 21-23, - ,
24,25, 26,21 . -
.
(4,5%),
( 3060). -
. -
506 OY

, CNU , -
, -
-2 (IL-2). , -
> 240 mg/m2, -
41,42.
-
35. E
- 1. : -
- -
, 43.
. - 2. : -
, -
2O2 O, -
, 44,45. -
, -
36-38.
- -
(bound) . - 46.
3. : (< 4 > 70
-. - ) -
- .
. - ,
, -
(.. -) in vitro - , ..47,
. .
4. :
- -
,
- 8-51. -
- , 4.000 ,
, 40. , -
- , -
(.. -
), , -

. - , 34 51-
53.
.
-
-
- .
. - -
2496 54. -
41. ,
. O , -
-
(myofibrillar), 55. -
(sarcotubular dilation) 24 -
, - , -
. - 200300 mg/m2
- . 48-
(crestolisis) , - 96
. O 600800 mg/m2 8001.000
VII. 507

mg/m2 -
, ) .
450 mg/m2 3
56. -
6. : - -
-
- .
43,44. -
- -
26%63.
-

57. O
7. : -
, - : -
, -
58. (450 mg/
- m2) -
- . O
53,58,59. -
, - :
1. -
, -
60,61. -
, -


. -

12% 50% -
- .
. ,
- ,
< 450 mg/m2, - ..,
7% 550 mg/m2, 15% . -
600 mg/m2 3040% 700 mg/m2(43). - ,

1,5% 600 mg/m2 12% , 53% 75%.
1.000 mg/m2. - -
12 , 89%, -
- 41% -
62. - 64.
, , - -
, - -
, - -
. - 65-67. 55
- , -
, , - > 15%
. - 45%.
- 59.
- 2. .
. (
-
508 OY

16.
-

450500 mg/m2 -
0 O 500600 mg/m2.
1 < 5% -
1,5 515% ,
2 1625% -
2,5 2635%

,
3 > 35% -
.
Billingham

150 mg/m2.
2. . -
- , 96
. - .
O rti et al -
, - ,
< 0,2%68. - (
, )
, - 168 mg/m2 -
- , 3
(. 16). 70.
Billingham - 3. .
, -
- , -
.
. - ) .
-
- .
> 240 mg/m2 42. - ,
, 1.100 mg/m2 (74).
-
-
450 mg/m2 0,6. -
50%69,70.
3. . O - 550 mg/m2 -
900 mg/m2 70-80.
. O - ) .
- ,
71. - -
- 81.
72,73. ) .
stealth -
-
. 75.
- K
-
1. . , -
(..
. )82. -
VII. 509

-
, - (dexra-
zoxane) . O
. , - , -
- ,
, ,
. - -
dexrazoxane cardiozoxane (bispipera- 88.
zinedione ICFR-187)83 -
83 -
. dexrazoxane -
(ADR-925)76, 89.
D, , -
, -
77 ( 160 mg/m2. -
1:5, 160 mg/m2
800 mg/m2 . -
). 150 -
5
, 160. mg -
(CAF), -
cardiozoxane (1.000 mg/m2 30 min - 100 mg/m2.
).
,
. -
3% - . -
27% -

CAF 84. - , -
-
, .
85
- , -
. 2002 .
O - 90,91.
dexrazoxane -
, - -D C -
86. . -
dexrazoxane O -

, - .
87.

OO
(O )
-
.
- -
. , -
92.
. O -
-
510 OY

- 5-
- -
100144 mg/kg. . -
,
. - 100. -
,
2 94. O
- Prinzmental.
. - -
- -
. - .
- 5-FU -
, 12,5% -
- . -
, - -
. , - ,
, -
- 318 .
- 1,6%
. 101.
-
4,5%, -
IV xo
. -
, -
. , , , -
- 102. O -
, 95. - ()
-
. - -
5 mg/m2 -
103.
.
-
96,97.
.
-
.

- , -
98.
-
, - 104.
, S- ,
, -
. O - -
- , -
. - .
99. -
. 105.
VII. 511

, 110.
rastuzumab -
, ,
, .
- -
, , rastuzumab 2% 7%110.
106. -
rastuzumab
29% , - ,
5%. - 111.
, -
rastuzumab -
. -
. (COG trial 2198). O -
- -
. . O
, - R2/neu
- . R2/neu
-
107. , -
112. -
rastuzumab (Herceptin) rastuzumab -
rastuzumab - -
, - 113,114. -
- , -
(LVEF)108,109. O -
, - 114.

1. Praga C, Beretta B, Bigo PL, et al. Adriamycin cardiotoxicity. 8. Talley RS, OBryan RM, Gutterman JA, Brownlee RW,
A survey of 1273 patients. Cancer Treat Rep 1979; 63: 821- McCredie KB. Clinical evaluation of toxic effects of cis-diam-
834. minedichlor oplatinum (NSC-119875). Phase I clinical study.
2. Dindogru A, Barcos M, Henderson ES, et al. Electrocardio- Cancer Chemother Rep 1973; 57: 465-471.
graphic changes following Adriamycin treatment. Med Pediatr 9. Hashini LA, Khalyl MF, Salem PA. Supraventricular tachycar-
Oncol 1978; 5: 65-71. dia. A probable complication of platinum treatment. Oncology
3. Weiss RB, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Marsoni S, et al. Amsacrine-asso- 1984; 41: 174-175.
ciated cardiotoxicity. An analysis of 82 cases. J Clin Oncol 10. Cannobbio L, Fassio T, Gasparini G, et al. Cardiac arrhyth-
1986; 4: 918-928. mia: possible complication from treatment with cisplatin. Tu-
4. Dodd HJ, Tatnall FM, Sarkany I. Fast atrial fibrillation in- mori 1986; 72: 201-204.
duced by treatment of psoriasis with azathioprine. Br Med J 11. Posner MR, Cohen GI, Skarin AT. Pericardial disease in pa-
1985; 291: 706. tients with cancer. Am J Med 1981; 71: 407-413.
5. Gasser AB, Tiech M, Brunner KW. Neurologic and cardiac to- 12. Harrison DT, Sanders LA. Pericarditis in case of early dauno-
xicity following IV application of methotrexate. Cancer Treat rubicin cardiomyopathy. Ann Intern Med 1976; 85: 339-340.
Rep 1982; 66: 1561-1562. 13. Appelbaum F, Strauchen JA, Graw RG, et al. Acute lethal
6. Hartmann DW, Robinson WA, Mangauk A, et al. Unantici- carditis caused by high-dose combination chemotherapy. A u-
pated side effects from treatment with high-dose mechloretha- nique clinical and pathological entity. Lancet 1976; 1: 58-62.
mine in patients with malignant melanoma. Cancer Treat Rep 14. Trigg ME, Finlay JL, Bozdech M, et al. Fatal cardiac toxicity
1981; 65: 327-382. in bone marrow transplant patients receiving cytosine arabino-
7. Buckner CD, Rudolph FH, Fefer A, et al. High-dose cyclo- side, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Cancer 1987;
phosphamide therapy for malignant disease. Toxicity, tumor 59: 38-42.
response, and the effects of stored autologous marrow. Cancer 15. Ahmed M, Slayton RE. Report on drug induced pericarditis.
1972; 29: 357-365. Cancer Treat Rep 1980; 64: 353-355.
512 OY

16. Corder MP, Flanney EP. Possible radiation pericarditis preci- the mouse heart against reactive oxygen metabolites: Altera-
pitated by actinomycin-D. Oncology 1974; 30: 81-84. tions produced by doxorubicin. J Clin Invest 1980; 65: 128-135.
17. Vaickus L, Letendre L. Pericarditis induced by high-dose cyta- 38. Myers C, Gianni L, Zwier J, et al. Role of iron in Adriamycin
rabine therapy. Arch Intern Med 1984; 144: 1868-1869. biochemistry. Fed Proceeding 1986; 45: 2792-2797.
18. Dent RG, McColl I. 5-fluorouracil and angina. Lancet 1975; 1: 39. Herman EH, Ferrans VJ. Amelioration of chronic anthracycli-
347-348. ne cardiotoxicity by ICRF-187 and other compounds. Cancer
19. Monk MR, Sanchez JD, Phelps CD, et al. Myocardial ischemia Treat Rev 1987; 14: 225-229.
with fluorouracil and floxuridine therapy. Clin Pharm 1987; 6: 40. Revis NW, Marusic N. Glutathione Peroxidase activity and se-
659-671. lenium concentration in the hearts of doxorubicin-treated rab-
20. Burger AJ, Mannino S. 5-fluorouracil-induced coronary vaso- bits. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1978; 10: 945-951.
spasm. Am Heart 1987; 114: 433-436. 41. Billinghman ME, Mason JW, Bristow MR, et al. Anthracycline
21. Mander EM, Lewinski U, Djaldetti M. Vinadistine-induced cardiomyopathy monitored by morphologic changes. Cancer
myocardial infraction. Cancer 1975; 36: 1979-1982. Treat Rep 1978; 62: 865-872.
22. Somers G, Abramov M, Wittek M, et al. Myocardial infra- 42. Billingham ME, Bristow MR. Evaluation of anthracycline car-
ction: a complication of vincristine treatment. Lancet 1976; 2: diotoxicity. Predictive ability and functional correlation of en-
680. domyocardial biopsy. Cancer Treat Symp 1984; 3: 71-76.
23. Lejonc JL, Vemant JP, Mcquin I, et al. Myocardial infraction 43. Von Hoff DD, Layard MW, Basa P, et al. Risk factors for do-
following vinblastine treatment. Lancet 1980; 2: 692. xorubicin-induced congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med
24. Ricci JA, Goldstein L. Coronary artery disease in the presence 1979; 91: 710-717.
of bleomycin therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 1982; 66: 410. 44. Minow RA, Benjamin RS, Gottlieb JA. Adriamycin (NSC-
25. Vogelzang NJ, Frenning DH, Kennedy BJ. Coronary artery di- 123127) cardiomyopathy. An overview with determination of
sease after treatment with bleomycin and vinblastine. Cancer risk factors. Cancer Treat Rep 1975; 6: 195-201.
Treat Rep 1980; 64: 1159-1160. 45. Bristow MR, Thompson PD, Martin RP, et al. Early anthracy-
26. Ippoliti G, Casirola G, Marini G, et al. Daunorubicin cardioto- cline cardiotoxicity. Am J Med 1978; 65: 823-832.
xicity. Lancet 1976; 1: 430. 46. Billingham ME, Bristow MR, Glatstein E, et al. Adriamycin
27. Mancuso L, Marchi S, Canonico A. Dynamic left ventricular cardiotoxicity: Endomyocardial biopsy evidence of enhance-
outflow obstruction and myocardial infraction following doxo- ment by irradiation. Am J Surg Pathol 1977; 1: 17-23.
rubicin administration in a woman affected by unsuspected hy- 47. Ettinghausen SE, Bonow RO, Palmeri ST, et al. Prospective
pertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 241- study of cardiomyopathy induced by adjuvant doxorubicin the-
244. rapy in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. Arch Surg 1986; 121:
28. Labianca R, Beretta G, Clerisi M, Fraschin P, Luporini G. 1445-1451.
Cardiac toxicity of 5-fluorouracil: a study of 1083 patients. Tu- 48. Weiss AJ, Metter GE, Fletcher WS, et al. Studies on adriamy-
mori 1982; 68: 505-510. cin using a weekly regimen demonstrating its clinical effective-
29. Robben NC, Pippas AW, Moore JO. The syndrome of 5-fluo- ness and lack of cardiac toxicity. Cancer Treat Rep 1976; 60:
rouracil cardiotoxicity. An elusive cardiopathy. Cancer 1993; 813-822.
71: 493-509. 49. Lefrak EA, Pitha J, Rosenheim S, Gottlieb J. A clinicopatho-
30. Liss RH, Chadwick M. Correlation of 5-FU (NSC-l9893) dis- logic analysis of adriamycin cardiotoxicity. Cancer 1973; 32:
tribution in rodents with toxicity and chemotherapy in man. 302-314.
Cancer Chemother Rep 1974; 58: 77. 50. Jones WG. Effective palliation of advanced breast cancer with
31. Eskilsson J, Albertsson M, Mercke C. Adverse cardiac effects weekly low dose epirubicin. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25:
during induction chemotherapy treatment with cisplatin and 5- 357-360.
fluorouracil. Radiother Oncol 1988; 13: 41-46. 51. Valdivieso M, Burgess MA, Ewer MS, et al. Increased thera-
32. Freeman NJ, Costanza ME. 5-fluorouracil associated cardioto- peutic index of weekly doxorubicin in the therapy of non-small
xicity. Cancer 1988; 61: 36-45. cell lung cancer. A prospective randomised study. J Clin Oncol
33. Lee RE, Lotze MT, Skibber JM, et al. Cardiorespiratory ef- 1984; 2: 207-214.
fects of immunotherapy with interleukin-2. J Clin Oncol 1989; 52. Chiebowski RT, Paroly WS, Pugh RP, et al. Adriamycin given
7: 7. as a weekly schedule without a loading course clinically effecti-
34. Legha SS, Keaing M, Picket S, Ajari JA, Ewer M, Bodey GP. ve with reduced incidence of cardiotoxicity. Cancer Treat Rep
Phase I clinical investigation of hormoharringtonine. Cancer 1980; 64: 7.
Treat Rep 1984; 68: 1085-1091. 53. Torti FM, Bristow MR, Howes AE, et al. Reduced cardiotoxi-
35. Unverferth DW, Magorien RD, Leier C, et al. Doxorubicin city of doxorubicin delivered on a weekly schedule. Ann Intern
cardiotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 1982; 9: 149-164. Med 1983; 99: 745-749.
36. Meyers CE, Liss RH, lfrim J, et al. The role of lipid peroxida- 54. Benjamin RS, Ewer MS, Mackay B, Ali MK, Legha SS, Valdi-
tion on cardiac toxicity and tumor response. Science 1977; 197: vieso M. An endomyocardial biopsy study of anthracycline-in-
165-167. duced cardiomyopathy: detection, reversibility, and potential
37. Doroshow JH, Locker GY, Myers CE. Enzymatic defense of amelioration. Proc of AACR/ASCO 1979; 20: 372.
VII. 513

55. Legha SS, Benjamin RS, Mackay B, et al. Reduction of doxo- 1997 Oct 21; 96(8): 2641-8.
rubicin cardiotoxicity by prolonged continuous intravenous in- 73. Herman EH, Zhang J, Lipshultz SE, et al. Correlation bet-
fusion. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96: 133-139. ween serum levels of cardiac troponin-T and the severity of the
56. Benjamin RS, Chawla SP, Ewer MS, et al. Organ directed toxi- chronic cardiomyopathy induced by doxorubicin. J Clin Oncol
cities of anticancer drugs. In: Hacker MP, Lazos JS, Tritton 1999; 17: 2237-43.
TR, eds. Adriamycin cardiac toxicity. An assessment of appro- 74. Cersoslmo RJ, Hong WK. Epirubicin: a review of the pharma-
aches to cardiac monitoring and cardioprotection. Martinus cology, clinical activity, and adverse effects of an adriamycin
Nijhoff Publishers, 1987. analogue. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 425-439.
57. Piver MS, Marchetti DL, Parthasarathy KL, et al. Doxorubicin 75. OBrien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, Rosso R, Grischke E, San-
hydrochloride (Adriamycin) cardiotoxicity evaluated by se- toro A, Catane R, Kieback DG, Tomczak P, Ackland SP, Or-
quential radionuclide angiocardiography. Cancer 1985; 56: 76- landi F, Mellars L, Alland L, Tendler C. Reduced cardiotoxici-
80. ty and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated li-
58. Gottdiener JS, Appelbaum FR, Ferrans VJ, et al. Cardiotoxici- posomal doxorubicin HCL (CAELYX/DOXIL) versus con-
ty associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy. Arch ventional doxorubicin for first line treatment of metastatic
Intern Med 1981; 141: 758-763. breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2004 Mar; 15(3): 440-9.
59. Alexander J, Dainiak N, Berger HJ, et al. Serial assessment of 76. Schroeder PE, Hasinoff BB. The doxorubicin-cardioprotective
doxorubicin cardiotoxicity with quantitative radionuclide an- drug dexrazoxane undergoes metabolism in the rat to its metal
giocardiography. N Engl J Med 1979; 300: 278-283. ion chelating form ADR-925. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol
60. Kushner JP, Hanser VL, Hammar SP. Cardiomyopathy after 2002; 50: 509-13.
widely separated course of adriamycin exacerbated by actino- 77. Seifert CF, Nesser ME, Thompson DF. Dexrazoxane in the
mycin-D and mithramycin. Cancer 1975; 36: 1577. prevention of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Ann Phar-
61. Buzdar AU, Legha SS, Tashima CR. Adriamycin and mitomy- macother 1994 Sep; 28(9): 1063-72.
cin-C. Possible synergistic cardiotoxicity. Cancer Treat Rep 78. Jain KK, Casper ES, Geller NL, et al. A prospective randomiz-
1978; 62: 1005. ed comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin in patients with
62. Haq MM, Legha SS, Choski J, et al. Doxorubicin-induced advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 818-826.
heart failure in adults. Cancer 1985; 56: 1361-1365. 79. Dardir MD, Ferrans VJ, Mikhael YS, et al. Cardiac morpholo-
63. Swain SM, Whaley FS, Ewer MS. Congestive heart failure in gy and functional changes induced by epirubicin chemothera-
patients treated with doxorubicin: a retrospective analysis of py. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 947-958.
three trials. Cancer 2003 Jun 1; 97(11): 2869-79. 80. Bonadonna G, Gianni L, Santoro A, et al. Drugs ten years la-
64. Mckillop JH, Bristow MR, Goris ML, et al. Sensitivity and spe- ter: Epirubicin. Ann Oncol 1993; 4: 359-369.
cificity of radionuclide ejection fractions in doxorubicin cardi- 81. Villani F, Galimbert M, Comazzi R, et al. Evaluation of car-
otoxicity. Am Heart J 1983; 106: 1048-1056. diac toxicity of idarubicin (4-demethoxydaunorubicin). Eur J
65. Druck MN, Gulenchyn KY, Eyens WK, et al. Radionuclide Clin Oncol 1989; 25: 13-18.
angiography and endomyocardial biopsy in the assessment of 82. Myers CE, McGuire WP, Liss RH, et al. Adriamycin: The role
doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Cancer 1984; 53: 1667-1674. of lipid, peroxidation in cardiac toxicity and tumor response.
66. Saini J, Rich MW, Lyss AP. Reversibility of severe left ventri- Science 1977; 197: 165-167.
cular dysfunction due to doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Ann In- 83. Herman EH, Ferrans VJ. Examination of the potential long-
tern Med 1987; 106: 814-816. lasting protective effect of ICRF-187 against anthracycline-in-
67. Schwartz R-G, McKenzie WB, Alexander J, et al. Congestive duced chronic cardiomyopathy. Cancer Treat Rev 1990; 17:
heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction complicating do- 155-160.
xorubicin therapy: seven year experience using radionuclide 84. Speyer JL, Green MD, Zeleninch-Jacquotte A, et al. ICRF-
angiocardiography. Am J Med 1987; 82: 1109-118. 187 permits longer treatment with doxorubicin in women with
68. Billingham ME, Tazelaar HD. Cardiac biopsy. In: Parmley breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 117-127.
WW, Chatterjee K, eds. Cardiology. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: J.B. 85. Swain SM, Vici P. The current and future role of dexrazoxane
Lippincott, 1987; 1-17. as a cardioprotectant in anthracycline treatment: expert panel
69. Fowles RE, Mason JW. Endomyocardial biopsy. Ann Intern review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004 Jan; 130(1): 1-7. Epub
Med 1982; 97: 885-894. 2003 Oct 17.
70. Torti PM, Bristow MM, Lum BL, et al. Cardiotoxicity of epiru- 86. Schuchter LM, Hensley ML, Meropol NJ, Winer EP. 2002 up-
bicin and doxorubicin. Assessment by endomyocardial biopsy. date of recommendations for the use of chemotherapy and ra-
Cancer Res 1986; 46: 3722-3727. diotherapy protectants: clinical practice guidelines of the A-
71. Auner HW, Tinchon C, Sill H, et al. Serum Troponin T as an merican Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2002 Jun
indicator of anthracycline cardiotoxicity in adults. Proc Am Soc 15; 20(12): 2895-903.
Clin Oncol 2001; 20: 389a. 87. Lipshulz SE, Rifai N, Dalton VM, Levy DA, Silverman LB,
72. Lipshultz SE, Rifai N, Sallan SE, Lipsitz SR, Dalton V, Sacks Lipsitz SR, Colan SD, Asselin BL, Barr RD, Clavell LA, Hur-
DB, Ottlinger ME. Predictive value of cardiac troponin T in witz CA, Moghrabi A, Samson Y, Schorin MA, Gelber RD,
pediatric patients at risk for myocardial injury. Circulation Sallan SE. The effect of dexrazoxane on myocardial injury in
514 OY

doxorubicin-treated children with acute lymphoblastic leuke- 1982; 61: 634-635.


mia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 145-53. 103. Frickhofen N, Beck FJ, Jung B, Fuhr HG, Andrasch H, Sig-
88. Posner LE, Ducart G, Goldberg J, et al. Mitoxantrone: An mund M. Capecitabine can induce acute coronary syndrome
overview of safety and toxicity. Invest New Drugs 1985; 3: 123- similar to 5-fluorouracil. Ann Oncol 2002 May; 13(5): 797-801.
132. 104. Hirvomen HE, Salmi TT, Heinomen E, et al. Vincristine treat-
89. Henderson JC, Allegra JC, Woodcock T, et al. Randomized ment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia induces transient auto-
clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in pre- nomic cardioneuropathy. Cancer 1989; 64: 801-805.
viously treated patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 105. Schechter JP, Jones SE. Myocardial infraction in a 27 year old
7: 560-571. woman. Possible complication of treatment with VP-16 medi-
90. White DA, Schwartzberg LS, Kris MG, et al. Acute chest pain astinal irradiation of both. Cancer Chemother Rep 1979; 59:
syndrome during bleomycin infusions. Cancer 1987; 59: 1582- 887-888.
1585. 106. Rowinsky EK, McGuire WP, Guamieri T, et al. Cardiac dis-
91. Edwards GS. Long term treatment with cisdichlorodiamminer turbances during the administration of taxol. J Clin Oncol
-platinum-vinblastin-bleomycin: Possible association with seve- 1991; 9: 1704-1712.
re coronary artery disease. Cancer Treat Rep 1979; 63: 551- 107. Giordano SH, Booser DJ, Murray JL, Ibrahim NK, Rahman
552. ZU, Valero V, Theriault RL, Rosales MF, Rivera E, Frye D,
92. Applebaum FR, Strauchen JA, Graw RG Jr, et al. Acute lethal Ewer M, Ordonez NG, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. A de-
carditis caused by high-dose combination chemotherapy. A u- tailed evaluation of cardiac toxicity: a phase II study of doxo-
nique clinical and pathological entity. Lancet 1976; 1: 58-62. rubicin and one- or three-hour-infusion paclitaxel in patients
93. Gottdiener JS, Applebaum FR, Ferrans VJ, et al. Cardiotoxici- with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002 Nov;
ty associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy. Arch 8(11): 3360-8.
Intern Med 1981; 141: 758-763. 108. Perez EA, Rodeheffer R. Clinical cardiac tolerability of tras-
94. Mills BA, Roberts RW. Cyclophosphamide induced cardiomy- tuzumab. J Clin Oncol 2004 Jan 15; 22(2): 322-9.
opathy. A report of two cases and review of the English litera- 109. Keefe DL. Trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity. Cancer 2002
ture. Cancer 1979; 43: 2223-2226. Oct 1; 95(7): 1592-600.
95. Herman EH, Mharte RM, Warardekar VS, et al. Comparison 110. Seidman A, Hudis C, Pierri MK, Shak S, Paton V, Ashby M,
of the cardiovascular action of NSC-109, 724 (ifosfamide) and Murphy M, Stewart SJ, Keefe D. Cardiac dysfunction in the
cyclophosphamide. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1978; 23: 178-190. trastuzumab clinical trials experience. J Clin Oncol 2002 Mar
96. Kandylis K, Vasilomanolakis M, Tsoussis F, Efremidis AP. Ifo- 1; 20(5): 1215-21.
sfamide cardiotoxicity in humans. Cancer Chemoth Pharmacol 111. Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, et al. Effect of doxorubi-
1989; 24(6): 395-3. cin plus cyclophosphamide on left ventricular ejection fra-
97. Einhorn LH. VP-16 plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin as salvage ction in the NCCTG Intergroup adjuvant trial. Proc Am Soc
therapy in refractory testicular cancer. Cancer Chemother Phar- Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 19a.
macol 1986; 18 (suppl 2): 545-550. 112. Lee KF, Simon H, Chen H, Bates B, Hung MC, Hauser C.
98. Weinberger A, Pinkas J, Sandbank U, et al. Endocardiac fibro- Requirement for neuregulin receptor erbB2 in neural and
sis following busulfan treatment. JAMA 1975; 231(abstract): cardiac development. Nature 1995 Nov 23; 378(6555): 394-8.
495. 113. Klein PM, Dybdal N. Trastuzumab and cardiac dysfunction:
99. Tomirotti M, Rinudi R, Pulci S, et al. Ischemic cardiopathy update on preclinical studies. Semin Oncol 2003 Oct; 30(5
from cis-diaminedichloroplatinum. Tumori 1984; 70: 235-236. Suppl 16): 49-53.
100. Pottage A, Holt S, Ludgate S, et al. Fluorouracil cardiotoxici- 114. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Ba-
ty. Br Med J 1978; 112: 547. jamonde A, Felming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M,
101. Labianca R, Beretta G, Clerid M, et la. Cardiac toxicity of 5- Baselga J, Norton L. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal
fluorouracil: A study of 1083 patients. Tumori 1982; 68: 505-510. antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that over-
102. Vorobio J DA. Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil. S Atr Med expresses HER2. N Engl J Med 2001; 15: 783-792.

OH OO (-
), )
- ,
- . , ) -
, - ,
- -
- ) ,
, - . -
) , -
VII. 515

-
17. -
2. -
DNA (
. )
3.
BCNU
-

.

, ,
. 4 -

-


.
4.

-

. -
-
- . -
-2 -

C
5.
.

-,
18. .



-TNF-, -TNF-, -
TNF- IL-

1,

6,7.

,
(. 17). , 8.
-
. , -
, 18. , -

O O OH -
A . -
O - -
,
, .
. -
-
. . -
,
- CXCR4 CCR79.
1. -
- OOOOA H
. O ,
, - ,
516 OY

. - -
, - , -
.
. - ,
- .

. -
-
- -
, , - .
, , - vn -
, - . -
10. - , -
, 450 -
- , > 10%18. -
(UIP) ( ), 450 ,
- 35%19. -
, . ,
-
- ( -
, ) O2 -
11,12. (. 19).
-
A H
,
. - , -
, - 1030%
. (<200 )20,21.
. -


13. - ( 1 mg/kg/-
- ). ,
. o -
, , -
, , 22. -
14,15. -
50% -
, -
23.

-
16.


, -
-
17.
- 19. -

. - > 70
, - > 450
(total lung capa- Hodgkins
city), 1 sec (forc- /
ed vital capacity) F1O2

(diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide)
.
VII. 517

39 - -
19. - 36.
-
.
() -
- . -
.
24-29. - -
,
, (-TNF ), - -
( ), (- 37.
), . -
,
C -
- , -
, (ARDS) 10%38.
.
3% 36%30. - -
,
- ARDS ,
. -
. 39.
-
. -
, - -
31. -
24 , - 40.
-
. . 9001.200
, - mg/m2 20%, -
32, - 3050% 1.500
- mg/m2 (41). -
. - BCNU -
- , 660750 mg/m2,
50% ARDS. , -
. , -
, .
30
mg/m2(33).
. - . -
612 - 450 mg/m2
, 300 mg/m2 42. O
. 9
12 -
- 43.
. (
- ARDS)
34. 2 .

- ,
35.
518 OY

. O -
, .
, 2 13 -
Wegener, - 50.
. 1 6 -
- , , . -
ARDS , - / -
44. .
51.
-
, ( )
, . -
. .
UIP
: ) (
. ) DLCO ). ,
. -
, - 51. -
45. ) - .
() 46. - (DAD), BOOP .
. -
( ).
O -
- . -
- TGF- -
47. - -
- .
. O - , 50120 mg/kg
- 4 ,
-
, 52. , -
3 . 6 -
48. - -
. - 53.
, -
.

-
. , -
1% .
. -
-
10 . , - , - -
, . , n54.
, - -
49. - -
. ,
.
-
- < 1%. -
. O - . -
VII. 519

. 10% -
. - 58. -
ARDS - ,
- 10%.
.
-
, . -
(30350 mg/m2).
9% 55. - -
,
, - , -
, 20% -
- 59. -
. O .
56. .
,
, ,
1 - , V
.
-
- 60,61. -
- -
5 g/m2 2 6 - 59.
-
, ,
, 56,57. all-trans
221 -
. ,
(ARDS) , , , -
16% - , -
6 . -
3 g/m2.
10 . .
, -


1. Lazo JS, Merrill WW, Pham ET, Lynch TJ, McCallister JD, 6. Piguet PF, Vesin C, Grau GE, Thompson RC. Interleukin 1
Ingbar DH. Bleomycin hydrolase activity in pulmonary cells. J receptor antagonist prevents or cures pulmonary fibrosis eli-
Pharmacol Exp Ther 1984 Dec; 231(3): 583-8. cited in mice by bleomycin or silica. Cytokine 1993 Jan; 5(1):
2. Lazo JS, Humphreys CJ. Lack of metabolism as the biochemi- 57-61.
cal basis of bleomycin induced pulmonary toxicity. Proc Natl 7. Ortiz LA, Lasky J, Hamilton RF Jr, Holian A, Hoyle GW,
Aca Sci USA 1983; 3064-3068. Banks W, Banks W, Peschon JJ, Brody AR, Lungarella G,
Friedman M. Expression of TNF receptors in bleomycin-in-
3. Harrison JH Jr, Hoyt DG, Lazo JS. Acute pulmonary toxicity
duced lung injury in mice. Exp Lung Res 1998 Nov-Dec; 24(6):
of bleomycin: DNA scission and matrix protein mRNA levels 721-43.
in bleomycin-sensitive and resistant strains of mice. Mol Phar-
8. Denholm EM, Phan SH. Bleomycin binding sites on alveolar
macol 1989 Aug; 36(2): 231-8. macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 1990 Dec; 48(6): 519-23.
4. Adamson , Bowden DH. The pathogenesis of bleomycin- 9. Hashimoto N, Jin H, Liu T, Chensue SW, Phan SH. Bone
induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Am J Pathol 1974; 77: marrow-derived progenitor cells in pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin
185-198. Invest 2004 Jan; 113(2): 243-52.
5. Schrier DJ, Phan SH, Ward . Cellular sensitivity to collagen 10. Smith GJW. The histopathology of pulmonary reactions to
in bleomycin-treated rats. J Immunol 1982; 129: 2156-2159. drugs. Clin Chest Med 1990; 11: 95.
520 OY

11. Holoyer , Luna , McKay , et al. Bleomycin hypersensi- Prospective study on the dose relationship of mitomycin C-in-
tivity pneumonitis. Ann ntern Med 1978; 88: 47. duced interstitial pneumonitis. Cancer 1987 Aug 15; 60 (4):
12. White DA, Kris MG, Stover DE. Bronchoalveolar lavage cell 756-61.
population in bleomycin-induced pulmonary toxicity. Thorax 34. Sheldon R, Slaughter D. syndrome of microangiopathic he-
1987; 42: 551. molytic anemia renal impairment and pulmonary edema in che-
13. White DA, Schwartzberg L, Kris MG, et al. Acute chest pain motherapy treated patients with adenocarcinoma. Cancer 1986;
during bleomycin infusions. Cancer 1987; 59: 1582. 58: 1428-1436.
14. Walden , MitcheII-Heggs PF, Coppin C, et al. Preurisy 35. Chang AY, Knebler JP, Pandya KJ, et al. Pulmonary toxicity
and methotrexate treatment. Br J Med 1977; 2: 867. induced by mitomycin C is highly responsive to glucocorticoids.
15. Orwoll ES, Kiessling , Patterson R. Interstitial pneumonia Cancer 1986; 57: 2285-2290.
from mitomycin. Ann Intern Med 1978; 89: 352. 36. Spain RC. The case for mitomycin in non-small cell lung can-
16. Weiss RB, Poster DS, Penta JS. The nitrozoureas and pulmo- cer. Oncology 1993 Apr; 50 Suppl 1: 35-50.
nary toxicity. Cancer Treat Rev 1981; 8: 11. 37. Horton LW, Chappell AG, Powel DEB. Diffuse interstitial
17. Rubin , Casarett GW. Clinical Radiation Pathology. Phila- pulmonary fibrosis complicating Hodgkins disease. Br J Dis
delphia: WB Saunders, 1968. Chest 1977; 71: 44-48.
18. Blum RH, Carter SK, Agre . clinical review of bleomycin, 38. Johnson RE, Brereton HD, Kent CH. Total therapy for
a new antineoplastic agent. Cancer 1973; 31: 903. small cell carcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg 1978; 25:
19. Jules-Elysee , White DA. Bleomycin-induced pulmonary to- 510-515.
xicity. Clin Chest Med 1990; 11: 1. 39. Maurer , Modeas C, Goutson , et al. Adult respiratory dis-
20. Schein PS, De Vita VT, Hubbard S, et al. Bleomycin, adriamy- tress syndrome after combined modality chemotherapy and ra-
cin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (BACOP) diation therapy in limited small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Soc
combinatin chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced dif- Clin Oncol 1990; 9 (abstr): 229.
fuse histiocytic lymphoma. nn Intern Med 1976; 85: 417-422. 40. Arrick , Nathan CF. Glutathione metabolism as a determi-
21. Bauer , Skarin , Balikian JP, Garnick , Rosenthal nant of therapeutic efficacy. review. Cancer Res 1984; 44:
DS, Canellos GP. Pulmonary complications associated with 4224-4232.
combination chemotherapy programs containing bleomycin. 41. Phillips GL, Fay JW, Herzig GP, et al. Intensive 1,3-bis (2-
Am J Med 1983; 74: 557. chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) NSC 436650 and cryopre-
22. Sostman HD, Matthay RA, Putnam CE. Cytotoxic drug-induc- served autologous marrow transplantation for refractory can-
ed lung disease. Am J Med 1977; 62: 608. cer. Cancer 1983; 52: 1792-1802.
23. White DA, Stover DE. Severe bleomycin-induced pneumoni- 42. Schmitz N, Diehl V. Carmustine and the lungs. Lancet 1997
tis: Clinical features and response to corticosteroids. Chest Jun 14; 349(9067): 1712-3.
1984; 86: 723. 43. ODriscoll BR, Hasleton PS, Taylor , et al. Active lung fi-
24. Sostman HD, Matthay RA, Putnam CE, Smith CJ. Methotre- brosis up to 17 years after chemotherapy with carmustine
xate-induced pneumonitis. Medicine 1976; 55: 371. (BCNU) in childhood. Engl J Med 1990; 323: 378-383.
25. Mark GJ, Lehingar-Zadeh , Ragsdale BD. Cyclophosphami- 44. Selker RG, Jacobs SA, Moore PB, et al. -1,3-Bis (2-chloroe-
de pneumonitis. Thorax 1978; 33: 89. thyl-1)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) induced pulmonary fibrosis. Neu-
26. Konitis , Aisner J, Sutheiland J, et al. Possible pulmonary rosurgery 1980; 7: 560-565.
toxicity secondary to vinblastine. Cancer 1982; 50: 2771. 45. Alessandrino EP, Bernascini P, Colombo A, Caldera D, Marti-
27. Cordonnier C, Vernant JP, Mital , et al. Pulmonary fibrosis nelli G, Vitulo P, Malcovati L, Nascimbene C, Varettoni M,
subsequent to high doses of CCNU for chronic leukemia. Can- Volpini E, Klersy C, Bernasconi C. Pulmonary toxicity follow-
cer 1983; 51: 1814. ing carmustine-based preparative regimens and autologous pe-
28. Reznill-Schuller , Smith AC, Thenot JP, et al. Pulmonary ripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in hematological
toxicity of the anticancer drug, bis-chloroethyl nitrozurea malignancies. Bone marrow Tranplant 2000 Feb; 25(3); 309-
(BCNU) in rats. Toxicologist 1984; 4: 29. 13.
29. Podoll LN, Winkler SS. Busulfan lung. Report of two cases 46. McGaughey DS, Nikcevich DA, Long GD, Vredenburgh JJ,
and review of the literature. AJR 1974; 120: 151. Rizzieri D, Smith CA, Broadwater G, Loftis JS, Mc Donald C,
30. Doll DC, Weiss RB, Issell . Mitomycin: Ten years after ap- Morris AK, Folz RF, Chao NF. Inhaled steroids as prophylaxis
proval for marketing. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 276-286. for delayed pulmonary toxicity syndrome in breast cancer pa-
31. Kris Mg, Pablo D, Gralla RJ, Burke MT, Prestifilippo J, Lewin tients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous
D. Dyspnea following vinblastine or vindesine administration stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Tranplant 2001;
in patients receiving mitomycin plus vinca alkaloid combination 7(5): 274-8.
therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 1984 Jul-Aug; 68(7-8): 1029-31. 47. Oliner , Schwartz R, Rubio F, et al. Interstitial pulmonary fi-
32. Rivera MP, Kris Mg, Gralla RJ, White DA. Syndrome of acute brosis following busulfan therapy. Am J Med 1961; 31: 134-139.
dyspnea related to combined mitomycin plus vinca alkaloid 48. Hankins DG, Sanders S, McDonald , et al. Pulmonary toxi-
chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 1995 Jun; 18(3): 245-50. city recurring after six weeks course of busulfan therapy and
33. Verweij J, van Zanten T, Souren T, Golding T, Pinedo HM. after subsequent therapy with uracil mustard. Chest 1978; 73:
VII. 521

415-416. 56. Filip DJ, Logue GL, Harle TS, et al. Pulmonary and hepatic
49. Crestani B, Jaccard A, Israel-Biet D, Couderc LJ, Frija J, complications of methotrexate therapy of psoriasis. JAMA
Clauvel JP. Chlorambucil-associated pneumonitis. Chest 1994 1971; 216: 881-882.
Feb; 105(2): 634-6. 57. Slavin RE, Dias , Saral L. Cytosine arabinoside induced
50. Karim FW , Ayash RE, Allan C, et al. Pulmonary fibrosis gastrointestinal toxic alterations in sequential chemotherapeu-
after prolonged treatment with low dose cyclophosphamide. tic protocols. clinical Pathologic study of 13 patients. Cancer
Oncology 1983; 40: 174-176. 1978; 42: 1747-1759.
51. Malik SW, Myers JL, DeRemee RA, Specks U. Lung toxicity 58. Smith WJ, Scharling ES, Capizzi RC, et al. Pulmonary infiltra-
associated with cyclophoshamide use. Two distinct patterns. tes associated with high-dose cytosine arabinoside during leu-
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996 Dec; 154(6 Pt 1): 1851-6. kemia induction therapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1988; 7
52. Slavin RE, Millan JE, Mullins GM. Pathology of high-dose in- (abstr): 186.
termittent cyclophosphamide therapy. Human Pathol 1975; 6: 59. Stemmer SM, Cagnoni PJ, Shpall EJ, Bearman SI, Matthes S,
693-709. Dufton C, Day T, Taffs S, Hami L, Martinez C, Purdy MH,
53. Moormeier JA, Williams SF, Kaminer LS. High-dose tri-Alky- Arron J, Jones RB. High-dose paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide,
lator chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in patients and cisplatin with autologous hemopoietic progenitor-cell sup-
with refractory malignancies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 29- port: a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 1996 May; 14(5): 1463-72.
34. 60. Goldberg HL, Vannice SB. Pneumonitis related to treatment
54. Bedrossian CWM, Miller WG, Luna . Methotrexate-in- with paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol 1995 Feb; 13(2): 534-5.
duced diffuse interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. South Med 1979; 61. Fujimori K, Yokohama A, Kurita Y, Uno K, Saijo N. Paclita-
72: 313-318. xel-induced cell-mediated hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Dia-
55. Urban C, Nirenberg , Caparros , et al. Chemical pleuritis as gnosis using leukocyte migration test, BAL and trasbronchial
the cause of acute chest pain following high-dose methotrexate lung biopsy. Oncology 1998 Jul-Aug; 55(4): 340-4.
treatment. Cancer 1983; 51: 34-37.

OOH OO
, -
- -
(. 20). -

, -
, .
, -
, , -
, .. ,
CD34+ -
, ,
,
. - , , , -
- (. 21).
, - ,
-
. O - .
,
, - -
, .

20. - 21.







,

522 OY

I O , -
O - ,
. 5.000
,
. -
4. -
. -
-
. - .
-
6285%1,2. - , -
.
- C, -
- X.
, 3. L- -
,
16 6.


1. Humphries JE, Hess CE, Stewart FM. Acute promyelocytic 4. Edwards RC, Klaus , Matthews , et al. Heparin abolishes
leukaemia: Impact of hemorrhagic complications on response the chemotherapy induced increase in plasma fibrinopeptide
to induction chemotherapy and survival. South Med J 1990; levels. Am J Med 1990; 89: 25-28.
83: 1157-1161. 5. Ruiz , Masugan J, Estalles , et al. The influence of che-
2. Goldberg , Ginsburg D, Mayer RJ, et al. Is heparins ad- motherapy on plasma coagulation and fibrinolytic systems in
ministration necessary during induction chemotherapy for pa- lung cancer patients. Cancer 1989; 63: 643-648.
tients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia? Blood 1987; 69: 6. Ott , Ramsay NKC, Priest JR, et al. Sequelae of thrombotic
187-191. or hemorrhagic complications following L-asparaginase thera-
3. Levine , Gent , Hirsch J, et al. The thrombogenic effects py for childhood lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Pediatr He-
of anticancer drug therapy in women with stage breast can- matol Oncol 1988; 10: 191-195.
cer. Engl J Med 1988; 318: 404-407.

OO O , BCNU . -
O O OO

, .
22.

1969 -
5. -
, -
, - ,
, , - .
1-4. 1
- .
. - 2
- , -
. 8 . -
. - -
16 mg /
, 4 . O
VII. 523

22.

,
, ,
O , , ,
, ,
,

,

- ,
5- O , ,
, ,
, , , ,
O ,
, ,

, , -
- .
. BCNU ,
, -
6. .


- -
7. 515 -
- .

24 .
8. O
,
, , -
, , - . -
, , - 25% -
, - 7.
. -
. -
, , -
O . O
. BCNU,
CCNU meCCNU
.
, , -
9. 5-
- 5-FU -
- , -
10. BCNU - ,
12,13. -
, - , -
, - . O CMF (, -
11. - , )
524 OY

, 13.
. .


14 -
. 5-FU -
-
. 20 mg -
18 ,
- -
- . -
, - 3040 mg -
. ,
, , - . O
, 15. 80 gr
120160 gr 19
-
, , -
.
-
-
. O
.
. O -
.
. O
-
-


,
.
. -
-
D -
16.
.

-
. -
.
17. O - -
,
52%20. O -
7n . .
.
. , -
. -
4 . . -
- , -
, , -, -

. O , -
, -
.


1. Ostrow S, Hahn D, Wiernik, et al. Ophthalmologic toxicity and ophthalmologic toxicity after treatment with cis-dichloro-
after cis-dichlorodiammino platinum therapy. Cancer Treat diamino platinum . J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1980; 96: 219-
Rep 1978; 62: 1591-1593. 221.
2. Becher R, Schutt , Osieka R, et al. Peripheral neuropathy 3. Wafsh TJ, Cfark AW, Parhard IM, et al. Neurotoxic effects of
VII. 525

cisplatin therapy. Arch Neurol 1982; 39: 719-720. 12. Hamersley J, Luce JK, Florentz TR, et al. Excessive lacrima-
4. Bosl GJ, Lage , Frafey , et al. Vinblastine, bleomycin tion from fluorouracil treatment. JAMA 1973; 225: 747-748.
and cis-diamminedichloro platinum in the treatment of advan- 13. Bonadonna G, Brusamolino E, Valagussa P, et al. Combina-
ced testicular carcinoma. Am J Med 1980; 68: 492-496. tion chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in operable breast
5. Podos SM, Caneffos GP. Lens changes in chronic granulocytic cancer. Engl J Med 1976; 294: 405-410.
leukemia. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 68: 500-504. 14. Straus DJ, Mansolf FA, Ellerby RA, et al. Cicatricial ectropion
6. amming , Apple D, Goldberg . Histopathology and ultra- secondary to 5-Fluorouracil therapy. Med Pediatr Oncol 1977;
structure of busulfan-induced cataracts. Graefes Arch Clin 3: 15-19.
xp Opthalmol 1976; 200: 139-147. 15. Hopen CR, Mondino BJ, Johnson BL, et al. Corneal toxicity
7. FraunJefder FT, eyer SM. Ocular toxicity of antineoplastic with systemic cytarabine. Am J Ophthalmol 1981; 91: 500-504.
agents. Am Acad Ophthalmol 1983; 90: 1-3. 16. Ritch PS, Hansen RM, Hener DK. Ocular toxicity from high
8. Kend G, Sirkin SR, Thomas PRM, et al. Blurring of vision. dose cytosine arabinoside. Cancer 1983; 51: 430-432.
previously undescribed complication of cyclophosphamide the- 17. Albert DM, Wong VG, Henderson ES. Ocular complications
rapy. Cancer 1979; 44: 69-71. of vincristine therapy. Arch Ophthalmol 1967; 78: 709-713.
9. McLennan R, Tayfor HR. Optic neuroretinitis in association 18. Ashford AR, Doney J, Tiwari RP, et al. Reversible ocular toxi-
with BCNU and procarbazine therapy. Med Pediatr Oncol city related t tamoxifen therapy. Cancer 1988; 61: 33-35.
1978; 4: 43-48. 19. Kaiser-Kupfer MJ, Lippman . Tamoxifen retinopathy. Can-
10. Louie AC, Turrisi AT, Mugia FM, et al. Letter to the editor. cer Treat Rep 1978; 62: 315-320.
Med Pediatr Oncol 1978; 5 (Letter): 245-247. 20. Hoover DL, Smith LEH, Turner SJ, et al. Ophthalmic evalua-
11. Shingfeton BJ, Bienfang DC, Afbert DM, et al. Ocular toxicity tion of survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Ophthalmo-
associated with-high dose carmustine. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; logy 1988; 95: 151-155.
100: 1766-1772.

OO O O O , -
Y . -
- (.. )
, - 23 ,
- (
. )
- -

, - 1.
, -
. O - 2. -
-
23.

O
- 3.
-
, . ,
40% -
.
, 23. -

( ) -


(-
).
-
,

,
526 OY

24.


Vinca
( )

- B
( )
-D ( )


6-
6-


-
- -
. . ,
, O O
- ,
4-7. - G-CSF (Filgrastim) 14 -
24%
2%13,14. -
,
. - , , ,
- . -
. O - ,
, - -
, (100 mg/m2 2, 22, 42),
, - 90% 15. -
- -
. , , ,
, , -
. , .
, ,
,
, -
8,9 (. 12). 24 -
,
. - -
.
(.. ) -
, , , , -
34 10,11. - , ,
-
12. O , .
,
- . -
. - /
(G-CSF, GM-CSF) ( -
VII. 527


O -


16. -
1214 -
, -
17.

1.000/L, -
. O -

.
12.
-
. . -

.
), (
), gram- gram- 18.
( ) O ,
. . -
, -
. O (Caries).
, (,
), - -
- . -
, . -
. -
57 . -
. - -
23 , -
(. 12). , .
-
( Vincent). O -
. - ,
, .
. - (interdental papillae). O -
WHO -
NCI 0 IV , veilbonella18. -
25.
.
-
-
25. . O -

0
, . -
, , . O -

, ,

(Candida Albicans)19. O
V
-
528 OY

Candida).
, -

. -
, .

-
.
-
-
.
O 18
13. .
24 -

(-
(7 ) (12
), -
14 ).
( ) -

(. 13). -
25-27.
. -
( < 25.000/mm3)
-
,
-
-
. -
, -
-
28.
- : ) ,
- , )
. O - -
, -
, - -
20,21,22. . -
, , - , -
- -
. ,
23.
- .
-
. -

1/3 . .
( -
) -
. - 29 ,
- 30. O
. -

- 31. -
. -
- ,
(Herpes ( )
Simplex Virus-) (Herpes , -
Zoster Virus). 32,33.
1148% ( -
VII. 529

. -
26. -

34, -
35. -
G-CSF , ,
- , ,
36.
, , ,

. , -
, ,
, / ,
Laser -, L-11, Caphosol - FUDR
, TGF-37 -
KGF38 ( , ,
, ,
).
, ,

OOO
- K
-
-

(. 26).
- C -
. . -
-
- 39
C40. E -
. - , -
,
, , , , - . -
, , - , -
. - 41 : )
- , ) -
, , ) , ) -
, . (-
. - ), -
- .
-
- 42.
,

. -
6-
642% 43 ( -
. ). -
16% 44 ( -
- ). ,
. 2 mg/kg.

, - .
Child-Pugh, - 6- -
, -
- 45,46. - -
. ,
530 OY

-
. , , ,
(200 mg/m2 5 ) 25% .
-
47,48.
(3 g/m2 12 16), - -
2275% 49,50. - -
65, 66 67. -
. O - -
- 2640%.
. ,
, , ,
51,52.
- 68. O
-
(> 20 ) . -
53,54. - -
12 - 69.
, -
. , >160 mg/m2
(70). -
55. 25
33%71.
, - ,

56 ( -
> 2 gr). X -
- 72.
. -
, ,
. 5
, 37 Wilms, -
52,57,58. - (60
trimetrexate, edatrexate dichloromethotrexate g/kg) 35 . -
. , -
25% 25% 73.
dichlrme- -
thtrexate - , -
59,60. 74.
O -
,
. -
-- (FUDR) .
14 , - .
50%61,62. -
, - -
FUDR .
- .
63,64. O - 815% 75,
- -
. . -
VII. 531

- ,
, - .
76. - -
, - .
. -
-
. L-
E. Coli. -
v v ,
- ,
. 42% 87% .
5%77. -
- ,
- .
20% 78.

-2 -
(- . -
1014 ) (maximun tolerated dose),
79-81. 20% (> 5 -
6% - )
, 25% - 40%
. .
- , 91,92. O -
82.
- -2, -
- , -693. -
310% -2
, 1.200 mg/m2, .
35%, 1.500 mg/ O (, , ) ,
m2(83,84). - ,
- 12
94-96.
85. , -

(tu-
, - mor necrosis factor TNF)97, -4 -
86. (1.600 -
mg/m2) - (GM-CSF)98.
-
O
87.

, -
- , -
1015% Borison McCarthy99 -
88,89. . -
15 -
, ,
, , ()
shock90. (). ,
-
532 OY

.
4 . -
()
(area postrema) -
n (chemoreceptor trigger ,
zone CTZ)100. CTZ - 5-3
, , - .
, , ,
- ,
. , -
CTZ 5--
- (5-).
, - ,
. (impulses) ..
CTZ , -
. - ,
. -

( ), - .
- 1 (1). -
. -
, 1
, - CTZ 105. O -
. O - apretitant,
, - 1 ,
.
().

. -
(CINV)
( , -
..), : ,
, ( ) .
CTZ, -
. -
- , ..
-
101. - , , -
- , -
( 5-3) ..
, -
102,103. -
5-3, - . O
, :
) .
. -
, -
5-3 , .
) . O
104. -
O (> 100 g ) ,
VII. 533

27.


(60 90%) (30 60%) (10 30%) (<10%)

75 mg < 75 mg < 1 g B
500 mg < 500 mg < 75 mg
> 200 mg > 1g 5250 mg
75 mg < 75 mg ( )
- > 1 gr < 250 mg
> 60 mg < 200 mg ( )
< 60 mg -
> 400 mg
-D 5-

, -
106,107. .
) . -
(delayed emesis)
-
. - -
- 24 .
, .
-
108. - .
5-3 o
-
. 113. O
) . O - -
. - .
- (anticipated emesis)
. -

-
-
, -
. . -
-

.
( ) -

. -

-
27.
) -
-
5-3 109, - . -
5-3110. . -
(be-
O haviour therapy)114.
12
,
. 30 -
, ,
, - . -
, -
111,112. - () .
, O 5-3, -
918 . , , ,
534 OY

- 10-8 48 .
, -
. -
115, -

- . O
. , - -
1 apretitant - 117.
5-3 - -
. -
, - .

. OO

,
. -
118.
OOI
- , ,
, - Golgi . -
- -
-
. O - 12. O
, -
, , , - 46 . -
, . -

(. 14). ,
- 119.
-
. - AO OO
, ,
-
,
116. 2 , -
120.
3

. -

121,122 -
.
2 .
, -
, .. -
-

.
123, -
5-3 -
14. . .
VII. 535

. , -
, 131. -
124. , , -
- , -
. -
- . O Bodey132
. O - 90% -
- -
. -
. , -
, - .
,
. . -
. O -
125 - , -
( ) 4050%
( - .
). -
.
, , , , -
, , -
SN38. -
SN38 . -
, , BCNU, -
Gilbert126 (- ,
). H 133,134,135.
. -
- .
. -
, - , -
IV - , -
. .
127. -
VIP O
, - ,
, - , -
. - , , -, -
, , - -
128, 129 130, - , -
. , , , ,
136,137,138.
O

-
-
. 139. -
- -
, , .
, -
. ( )

- ,
536 OY

, .
, -
. -
, .
. - .
, 500/L. -
-
, , ,
. O - -
140. -
, (.. Clost. Septicum), -
. - , -
, . -
, , , -
. - , stress
. , -
, - , -
- , , -
. , - , -
. , - , ,
- . O -
, , , , -
. - , , , -
(50100%). - 140,141, -
.
. - -
, - . , -
, 2 -
, - .
, . .

O -
- .
, , -
- OOO O
, . O OO OO
, ,
, gram
. - -
, - -
. (VOD). -
50% . -
-
. (GVHD). -
, ,
- , ,
. - .
, - +30 -
, , ,
. - , -
- . -
VII. 537

, . - 28. GVHD
,
+30 +100
GVHD - +1 22,9 mg/dl
. - +2 35,9 mg/dl
. +3 614,9 mg/dl
+4 15 mg/dl

-
1954 Bras, Jelliffe Stuart, -
1976 . -
-
142,148. . GVHD
- . -
- Kupffer, -
/ , -
154.
v . - ,
149. -
. / , -
, - -
. - -,
- -
. -
(TNF ..).

. 4050%
VOD , - 100 ,
, . (BCNU), 3 4 . -
C - -
/ +1 +4,
150,151. 28.
. -
- -
, - . -
,
. . O
- ,
PGE-1 . - -
- . ,
(rt-PA)152 - . -
153. , , -
- (TG) -
- (O3) .
(GVHD)
GVHD, . / -
GVHD 155.
, .
- GVHD
- O GVHD -
, -
538 OY

. - -
, - . -
. -
, -
. - , ,
+100 , .
+40 +50 1
. .
-

1. Sonis ST, Koplovsky , Mitus J, Rosenthal D, Brand . Re- 15. Fountzilas G, Skarlos D, Kosmidis , et al. Definite radiation
lationship of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and bone mar- and concurrent cisplatin administration in locally advanced
row cellularity in hamsters. J Oral Med Oral Path 1990, in head and neck cancer. Proc of the 4th International Congress
press. of Anti-cancer Chemotherapy. Paris, 1993: 129.
2. Sonis AL, Sonis ST. Oral complications of cancer chemothera- 16. Lockhart , Sonis ST. Alterations in the oral mucosa caused
py in pediatric patients. J Pedodontics 1979; 3: 122-128. by chemotherapeutic agents. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1981; 7:
3. Peterson DW, Overhosler CD. Increased morbidity associated 10-19.
with oral infection in patients with acute leukemia. Oral Surg 17. Lockhart , Sonis ST. Relationship of oral complications to
1982; 53: 32-36. peripheral blood leukocyte and platelet counts in patients re-
4. Beck S. Impact of a systematic oral care protocol n stomatitis ceiving cancer chemotherapy. Oral Surg 1979; 48: 21-28.
after chemotherapy. Cancer News 1979; 2: 185-189. 18. Peterson DE. Pretreatment strategies in infections prevention
5. Hickey AJ, Toth , Lindquist SB. Effect of intravenous hy- in chemotherapy patients. NCI Monogr 1990; 9: 61.
peralimentantion and oral care on the developement of oral 19. Bodey GP. Fungal infections complicating acute leukemia. J
stomatitis during cancer chemotherapy. J Prosthet Dent 1982; Chronic Dis 1966; 19: 667-687.
47: 188-193.
20. Carpentieri U, Haggard , Lockhart LH, et al. Clinical ex-
6. Sonis S, Kunz . Impact of improved dental services on the perience in prevention of candidiasis by nystatin in children
frequency of oral complications of cancer therapy for patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia. J Pediatr 1975; 92: 593-595.
with nonhead and neck malignancies. Oral Surg Oral Med
21. vie . Clotrimazole treatment for prevention of oral candi-
Oral Pathol 1988; 65: 19.
diasis in patients with acute leukemia undergoing chemothera-
7. Banier AR. Nursing management of acute oral complications
py. Am J Med 1987; 82: 867.
in cancer. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1990; 9: 123.
22. izzo . Infectious complications in the child with cancer. J
8. Dreizen S. Stomatoxic manifestations of cancer chemothera-
Pediatr 1981; 98: 513.
py. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 650-655.
23. arrett AP. Evaluation of nystatin in prevention and elimina-
9. Dergman OJ. Oral infections and septicaemia in immuno-
tion of oropharyngeal Candida in immunosuppressed patients.
compromized patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984 Aug; 58(2): 148-51.
Microbiol 1988; 26: 2105.
10. Jone WG. Effective palliation of advanced breast cancer with 24. Sarai R, Burns WH, Prentice HG. Herpes virus infections. Cli-
weekly low dose epirubicin. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25: nical manifestations and therapeutic strategies in immuno-
357-360. compromised patients. Clin Heamatol 1984; 13: 645.
11. Volger W, Huguley C, Kerr W. Toxicity and antitumor effect 25. Sarai R, Burns WH, Laskin OL, Santos GW, Lietman PS. A-
of divided doses of methotrexate. Arch Intern Med 1965; 115: cyclovir prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus infections. Engl
285-293. J Med 1981; 305: 63.
12. Habesshew , Paul J, Jones R, et al. Epirubicin at two dose le- 26. Wade JC, Newton , McLaren C, Flournoy , Keeney ,
vels with prednisolone as treatment for advance breast cancer: Myers JD. Intravenous acyclovir to treat mucocutaneous her-
The results of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 295- pes simplex virus infection after marrow transplantatin.
304. double blind trial. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97: 265.
13. Fountzilas G, Skarlos D, Pavlidis , et al. High-dose epirubi- 27. Wade JC, Day LM, Crowley JJ, Myers JD. Recurrent infe-
cin as a single agent in the treatment of patients with advanced ction with herpes simplex virus after marrow transplantation.
breast cancer. Tumori 1991; 77: 232-236. Role of specific immune response and acyclovir treatment. J
14. Fountzilas G, Skarlos D, Katsohis C, et al. High-dose epirubi- Intern Dis 1984; 149: 750.
cin and r-met-hu G-CSF (Filgrastim) in the treatment of pa- 28. Stafford R, Lockhart , Sonis , et al. Hematologic parame-
tients with advanced breast cancer. Med Pediat Onc 1993, in ters as predictor of oral invlvement in the presentation of a-
press. cute leukemia. J Oral Med 1982; 37: 38-41.
VII. 539

29. Mahood DJ, Dose AM, Loprinzi CL, Veeder MH, Athmann ne for the prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepa-
LM, Therneau, Sorensen JM, Gainey DK, Mailliard JA, Gusa titis B s-antigen seropositive cancer patients undergoing cyto-
NL, et al. Inhibition of fluorouracil-induced stomatitis by oral toxic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2004 Mar 1; 22(5): 927-34.
cryotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1991 Mar; 9(3): 449-52. 43. Einhorn , Davidson . Hepatotoxicity of mercaptopurine.
30. Meloni G, Capria S, Proia A, et al. Ice pops to prevent mel- JAMA 1964; 108: 802.
phalan induced stomatitis. Lancet 1996; 347: 1691. 44. Rind DJ, Foyle LV Jr. 6-mercaptopurine (NSC 755) given in-
31. Loprinzi CL, Cianflone SG, Dose AM, Etzell PS, Burnham termittenly in high-dose: phase study. Cancer Chemother
NL, Therneau TM, Hagen L, Gainey DK, Cross M, Athmann Rep 1970; 54: 31.
LM, et al. A controlled evaluation of an allopurinol mouth- 45. DCruz CA, Wimmer RS, Harcke , Huff DS, Naiman JL.
wash as prophylaxis against 5-fluorouracil-induced stomatitis. Veno-occlusive disease of the liver in children following che-
Cancer 1990 Apr 15; 65(8): 1879-82. motherapy for acute myelotic leukemia. Cancer 1983; 51: 1803.
32. Ahmed T, Engelking C, Szalyga J, Helson L, Coombe N, Cook 46. Larrey D, Freneaux , Betson , et al. Peliosis hepatitis induc-
P, Corbi D, Puccio C, Chun H, Mittelman A. Propantheline ed by 6-thioguanine administration. Gut 1988; 29: 1265.
prevention of mucositis from etoposide. Bone marrow Trans- 47. Wang JJ, Selawry OS, Vietti TJ, Bodey GP. Prolonged infu-
plant 1993 Aug; 12(2): 131-2. sion of arabionosyl cytosine in childhood leukemia. Cancer 1970;
33. Oblon DJ, Paul SR, Oblon MB, Malik S. Propantheline pro- 25: 1.
tects the oral mucosa after high-dose ifosphamide, carboplatin, 48. Griffin JD, Spriggs D, Wisch JS, Kufe DW. Treatment of pre-
etoposide and autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Mar- leukemic syndromes with continuous infusion of low-dose cy-
row Transplant 1997 Dec; 20(11): 961-3. tosine arabinoside. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 982.
34. Anderson PM, Schroder G, Skubitz KM. Oral glutamine redu- 49. Herzig RH, Wolff SN, Lazarus , Phillips GL, Karanes C,
ces the duration and severity of stomatitis after cytotoxic can- Herzig GP. High-dose cytosine arabinoside therapy for refra-
cer chemotherapy. Cancer 1998 Oct 1; 83(7): 1433-9. ctory leukemia. Blood 1983; 62: 361.
35. Jebb SA, Osborne RJ, Maughan TS, Mohideen N, Mack P, 50. Kantarjlan , Estey , Plunket W, et al. Phase I-II clinical
Mort D, Shelley MD, Elia M. 5-fluorouracil and follinic acid and pharmacologic studies of high-dose cytosine arabinoside
induces mucositis: no effect of oral glutamine supplementa- in refractory leukemia. Am J Med 1986; 81: 387.
tion. Br J Cancer 1994 Oct; 70(4): 732-5.
51. Hersh , Wong WG, Henderson ES, Freireich EJ. Hepato-
36. Gabrilove JL, Jakubowski A, Scher H, Sternberg C, Wong G, toxic effects of methotrexate. Cancer 1966; 19: 1600.
Grous J, Yagoda A, Fain K, Moore MA, Clarkson B, et al. Ef-
52. Nesbit , Krivit W, Heyn R, Sharp . Acute and chronic ef-
fect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on neutropenia
fects of methotrexate of hepatic, pulmonary and skeletal sy-
and associated morbidity due to chemotherapy for transitio-
stems. Cancer 1976; 37: 1048.
nal-cell carcinoma of the urothelium. N Engl J Med 1988 Jun
2; 318(22): 1414-22. 53. Jaffe , Traggis D. Toxicity of high-dose methotrexate (NSC
740) and citrovorum factor (NSC 3590) in osteogenic sarcoma.
37. Sonis ST, Van Vugt AG, Brien JP, Muska AD, Bruskin AM,
Cancer Chemother Rep 1975; 6: 31.
Rose A, Haley JD. Transforming growth factor-beta 3 mediat-
ed modulation of cell cycling and attenuation of 5-fluorouracil 54. Wever BL, Tanyer G, Poplack DG, et al. Transient acute he-
induced oral mucositis. Oral Oncol 1997 Jan; 33 (1): 47-54. patotoxicity of high-dose methotrexate therapy during child-
hood. NCI Monogr 1987; 5: 207.
38. Meropol NJ, Somer RA, Gutheil J, Pelley RJ, Modiano MR,
Rowinsky EK, Rothenberg ML, Redding SW, Serdar CM, 55. Hutter R VP, Shipkey FH, Tan CTC. Hepatic fibrosis in chil-
Yao B, Heard R, Rosen LS. Randomized phase I trial of re- dren with acute leukemia. complication of therapy. Cancer
combinant human keratinocyte growth factor plus chemothe- 1960; 13: 288.
rapy: potential role as mucosal protectant. J Clin Oncol 2003 56. Sznol , Ohnuma , Holland JF. Hepatic toxicity of drugs
Apr 15; 21(8): 1452-8. used for hematologic neoplasia. Semin Liver Dis 1987; 7: 237.
39. Liang R, Lau GK, Kwong YL. Chemotherapy and bone mar- 57. Macintosh S, Davidson DL, OBrien RT, Parson . Metho-
row transplantation for cancer patients who are also chronic trexate hepatotoxicity in children with leukemia. J Pediatr 1977;
hepatitis B carriers: a review of the problem. J Clin Oncol 1999 90: 1019.
Jan; 17(1): 394-8. 58. Parker D, Bate CM, Crafi W, Graham-Pole J, Malpas JS,
40. Zuckerman E, Zuckerman T, Douer D, Qian D, Levine AM. Stansfeld AG. Liver damage in children with acute leukemia
Liver dysfunction in patients infected with hepatitis C virus un- and non-Hodgkin lymphoma on oral maintenance chemothe-
dergoing chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. Cancer rapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1980; 4: 121.
1998 Sep 15; 83(6): 1224-30. 59. Shum , Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Burke , Markd LD, Hee-
41. Yeo W, Zee B, Zhong S, Chan PK, Wonk WL, Ho WM, Lam fan RT. Phase study on 10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminoprotein in
KC, Johnson PJ. Comprehensive analysis of risk factors asso- patients with stage and IV non-small cell lung cancer. J
ciating with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in cancer pa- Clin Oncol 1998; 6: 659-662.
tients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2004 60. Hantef , Rowinsky , Noe DA, et al. Clinical and pharma-
Apr 5; 90(7): 1306-11. cologic reappraisal of dichloromethotrexate. J Natl Cancer
42. Yeo W, Chan PK, Ho WM, Zee B, Lam KC, Lei KI, Chan AT, Inst 1988; 89: 1547.
Mok TS, Lee JJ, Leung TW, Zhong S, Johnson PJ. Lamivudi- 61. ohn D, Stagg RJ, Friedman , et al. randomized trial of
540 OY

continuous intravenous versus hepatic intraarterial floxuridine treated acute leukemia. Cancer Clin Trials 1980; 3: 325.
in patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. The 77. Amromin GD, Deliman RM, Shanbrom . Liver damage after
Northern California Oncology Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 1989; chemotherapy for leukemia and lymphoma. Gastroenterology
7: 1646. 1962; 42: 401.
62. Kemeny , Dafy J, Reichman , Geffer , tet J, Oderman 78. Left RS, Thompson JM, Johnson DB, et al. Phase trial of
. Intrahepatic or systemic infusion of fluorodeoxyuridine in high-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplan-
patients with liver metastates from colorectal carcinoma. A ran- tation for metastatic colon carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4:
domized study. Ann Intern Med 1987; 107: 459. 1586.
63. Doria MI Jr, Sheppard , Levin , Riddeff RH. Liver patho- 79. Belt RJ, McGregor D, Haas CD, Bhatia PS. Cholestatic jaun-
logy following hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Cancer dice associated with chlorozotocin. Cancer Treat Rep 1980; 64:
1986; 58: 855. 1235.
64. Hohn D, Meinick J, Stagg R, et al. Biliary sclerosis in patients 80. Hoogstraten , Gottlieb JA, Caoili , et al. CCNU (1-[2-chlo-
receiving hepatic arterial infusions of floxuridine. J Clin Oncol roethyl-]-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea) (NSC 9037) in the treat-
1985; 3: 98. ment of cancer. Cancer 1973; 32: 38.
65. Dabich L, Buff FE, Bettran G, et al. Phase II evaluation of a- 81. Schein PS, OConell MJ, Blom J, et al. Clinical antitumor acti-
clarubicin in refractory adult leukemia. Southwest Oncology vity and toxicity of streptozotocin (NSC 85998). Cancer 1974;
Group study. Cancer Treat Rep 1986; 70: 967. 34: 993.
66. Arfin , Sifver R, Cassifeth , et al. Phase I-II trial of mito- 82. Moertel CG, Schutt AJ, Reitemeir RJ, Hahn RG. phase
xantrone in acute leukemia. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 61. study of 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (NSC
67. Daghestani , Arfin , Leyfand-Jones , et al. Phase I and 9037) in the palliative management of advanced gastrointesti-
II clinical and pharmacological study of 4-Demethoxydaunoru- nal cancer. Cancer Res 1972; 32: 1278.
bicin (idarubicin) in adult patients with acute leukemia. Can- 83. Mcntyre RE, Magidson JG, Austin GE, Gale RP. Fatal veno-
cer Res 1985; 45: 1408. occlusive disease of the liver following high-dose 1,3-bis (2-
68. Minow RA, Stern , Cassey JH, Rodriguez V, Luna . chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and autologous bone mar-
Clinicopathologic correlation of liver damage in patients treat- row transplantation. Am J Clin Pathol 1981; 75: 614.
ed with 6-mercaptopurine and adriamycin. Cancer 1976; 38: 84. Philips GL, Wolff SN, Fay JW, et al. Intensive 1,3-bis-(2-chlo-
1524. roethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) monochemotherapy and auto-
69. Wells PG, Boerth RC, Oates JA, Harbinson RD. Toxicologic logous bone marrow transplantation for malignant glioma. J
enhancement by a combinatin of drugs which deplete hepatic Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 639.
glutathione: Acetaminophen and doxorubicin (adriamycin). To- 85. Kehrer JP. The effect of BCNU (carmustine) of tissue gluta-
xicol ppl Pharmacol 1980; 54: 197. thione reductase activity. xicol-Lett 1983; 17: 63.
70. Von Hoff DD, Howser D, Gromley RA, et al. Phase I study of 86. ill JM, Loeb , McLellan A. Clinical studies of platinum co-
methansulfonamide (-[4-9-acridinylamin)-3-methoxyphenyl]- ordination cmpounds in the treatment of various malignant
mAMSA) using a single dose schedule. Cancer Treat Rep 1978; diseases. Cancer Chemother Rep 1975; 59: 647.
62: 1241. 87. Shea TC, Flaherty , Elias , et al. phase clinical and
71. Arlin . Current status of amsacrine (SA) combination pharmacokinetics study of carboplatin and autologous bone
chemotherapy programm in acute leukemia. Cancer Treat Rep marrow support. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 651.
1983; 67: 967. 88. Johnson RO, Metter G, Wilson W, ill G, Krementz . Phase
72. Shoemaker DD, Gormley , Cysyk RL. illiary excretion of evaluation of DTIC (NSC 45388) and other studies in malig-
4-(9-acrirdinylamino) methansulfon-M-amsidide (AMSA) in nant melanoma in the Central Oncology Group. Cancer Treat
rats: Effects of pretreatment with diethymaleate phenobarbi- Rep 1976; 60: 183.
tal, and metyrapone. Drug Metab Dispos 1980; 8: 467. 89. Erichsen C, Jonsson . Veno-occlusive liver disease after da-
73. Green DM, Norkool , Breslow , Finkienstein JD, DAngio carbazine therapy (DTIC) for melanoma. J Surg Oncol 1984;
GJ. Severe hepatic toxicity after treatment with vincristine and 27: 268.
dactinomycin using single-dose or divided dose-schedules. 90. Asbury RF, Rosenthal SN, Descalzi , RatcIiffe BL, Arse-
report of the National Wilms Tumor Study. J Clin Oncol 1990; neau JC. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease due to DTIC. Cancer
8: 1525. 1980; 45: 2670.
74. Tefft , Mitus , Jaffe . Irradiation of the liver in children: 91. Fisher , Keenan , Garra BS, et al. Interleukin-2 induces
Acute effects enhanced by concomitant chemotherapeutic ad- profound reversible cholestasis: detailed analysis in treated
ministration? Am J Roentgenol Rad Therapy & Nuclear Med cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1852.
1971; 111: 165. 92. Margolin , Rayner , Hawkins MJ, et al. Interleukin-2
75. ODwer J, King SA, Hoth DF, Suffness , Leyland-Jones . and lymphokine-activated killer cell therapy of solid tumors.
Homoharringtonine-perspectives of a new natural product. J Analysis of toxicity and management guidelines. J Clin Oncol
Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1563. 1989; 7: 486.
76. Van Echo DA, Wiernik , Aisner J. High-dose VP-16-213 93. Heinrich PC, Castelli JV, Andus . Interleukin-6 and the acu-
(NSC 141540) for the treatment of patients with previously te phase response. Biochem J 1990; 265: 621.
VII. 541

94. Sherwin SA, Knost JA, Fein S, et al. multiple-dose phase 111. Fetting JH, Grochow LB, Fofstein MF, et al. The course of
trial of recombinant leukocyte interferon in cancer patients. nausea and vomiting after high-dose cyclophosphamide. Can-
JAMA 1982; 248: 2461. cer Treat Rep 1982; 66: 1487-1493.
95. Hu , Horning SJ. Phase study of recombinant human inter- 112. Martin , Diaz Rubio , Sanchez , et al. The natural course
feron beta in patients with advanced cancer. J i Resp Mod of emesis after carboplatin treatment. Acta Oncologica 1990;
1987; 6: 121. 29: 593-596.
96. Kuzrock R, Quesada JR, alpaz , et al. Phase study of mul- 113. Kris MG, Graffa RJ, Clark RA, et al. Incidence, course and
tiple dose intramuscularly administered recombinant gamma severity of delayed nausea and vomiting following the admini-
interfern. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1101. stration of high-dose cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 1379-1384.
97. Greaven J, Plager JE, Dupere S, et al. Phase clinical trial of 114. Morrow GR, Morreff C. Behavioral treatment for the antici-
recombinant-human tumor necrsis factor. Cancer Chemother patory nausea and vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapy.
Pharmacol 1987; 20: 137. Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1476-1480.
98. Lieschke GJ, Maher D, Cebon J, et al. Effects of bacterically 115. Eisenberg P, Figueroa-Vadillo J, Zamora R, Charu V, Had-
synthesized recmbinant-human granulocyte-macrophage c- jenberg J, Cartmell A, Macciocchi A, Grunberg S. Improved
lny-stimulating factor in patients with advanced malignancy. prevention of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy-induced
nn Intern Med 1989; -110: 357. nausea and vomiting with palosentron, a pharmacologically
99. Borison HL, McCarthy LE. Neuropharmacology of chemothe- novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist: results of a phase III, single
rapy induced emesis. Drugs 1983; 25: 8-17. dose trial versus dolasentron. Cancer 2003 Dec 1; 98(11):
100. Borison HL. Role of the area postrema in vmiting and re- 2473-82.
lated functions. Rev Pharmacol Clin xp 1986; 2 (Suppl): 7-8. 116. Bfeyer W. The clinical pharmacology of methotrexate. Can-
101. Gralla RJ, Braunt J, Squillante , et al. Metoclopramide: I- cer 1978; 41: 36-51.
nitial clinical studies of high dosage regimens in cisplatin-in- 117. Kennedy BJ, Theofogides . The role of 5-flurouracil in ma-
duced emesis. In: Poster D, ed. The treatment of nausea and lignant disease. nn ntern Med 1961; 55: 719-730.
vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapy. New York: Mas- 118. Wurth , Musacchifa XJ. Mechlorethamine effects of inte-
son Publishing, 1981: 167-176. stinal absorption in vitro and n cell proliferation. J Physiol
102. Fozard JR, Mobarok . Blockade of neuronal tryptamine re- 1973; 225: 73-80.
ceptors by metclpramide. ur J Pharmacol 1978; 49: 109- 119. Shaw , Spector , Ladman AJ. Effects of cancer, radio-
112. therapy and cytotoxic drugs on intestinal structure and fun-
103. Ireland SJ, Straughan OW, Tyers . nfluence of 5- up- ction. Cancer Treat Rev 1979; 6: 141-151.
take n the apparent 5- antagonist potency of metoclopra- 120. Weiss H, Walker M, Wiernik P. Neurotoxicity of commonly
mide n the rat isolated superior cervival ganglion. Br J Phar- used antineoplastic agents. Engl J Med 1974; 219: 75-81,
macol 1987; 90: 151-160. 127-133.
104. Graffa RJ. Current issues in the management of nausea and 121. Holland JF, Scharlan C, Gailani S, et al. Vincristine treatment
vomiting. nn Oncol 1993; 4 (Suppl 3): 37. of advanced cancer. cooperative study of 392 cases. Cancer
105. Saria A. The tachykinin NK1 receptor in the brain: pharma- Res 1973; 33: 1258-1264.
cology and putative functions. Eur J Pharmacol 1999 Jun 30; 122. Sandler SG, Tobin W, Henderson ES. Vincristine induced
375(1-3): 51-60. neuropathy. clinical study of fifty leukemia patients. Neuro-
106. D Acquisto RW, Tyson LB, Graffa RJ, et al. The influence of logy 1969; 19: 367-374.
a chronic high alcohol intake one chemotherapy-induced nau- 123. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Robertson P, Eddle-
sea and vomiting. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1986; 5: 257. mon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, Zed-
107. Suffivan JR, Leyden MJ, Beff R. Decreased cisplatin induced dis J, Barlogie B. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refra-
nausea and vomiting with alcohol ingestion. Engl J Med ctory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1999 Nov 18; 341(21);
1983; 309: 796. 1565-71.
108. Kris MG, Tyson LB, Graffa RJ, et al. Extrapyrimidal rea- 124. Sherkock . Effect of cancer treatment of nutrition and ga-
ctions with high-dose metoclopramide. Engl J Med 1983; strointestinal function. Clin Bull 1979; 9: 136-145.
309: 433. 125. Hecht JR. Gastrointestinal toxicity of irinotecan. Oncology
109. Tremblay PB, Kaiser R, Sezer O, Rosler N, Schelenz C, Pos- (Huntinght) 1998 Aug; 12(8 suppl 6): 72-8.
singer K, Roots I, Brockmoller J. Variations in the 5-hydroxy- 126. Wasserman E, Myara A, Lokiec F, Golgwasser F, Trivin F,
tryptamine type 3B receptor gene as predictors of the efficacy Mahjoubi F, Misset JL, Cvitkovic E. Severe CPT-11 toxicity in
of antiemetic treatment in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2003 patients with Gilberts syndrome: two case reports. Ann On-
Jun 1; 21(11): 2147-55. col 1997 Oct; 8(10): 1049-51.
110. Kaiser R, Sezer O, Papies A, Bauer S, Scelenz C, Tremblay 127. Lamberts SW, van der Lely AJ, de Herder WW, Hofland LJ.
PB, Possinger K, Roots I, Brockmoller J. Patient-tailored an- Octreotide. N Engl J Med 1996 Jan 25; 334(4): 246-54.
tiemetic treatment with 5-hydroxy-tryptamine type 3 receptor 128. Govindarajan R, Heaton KM, Broadwater R, Zeitlin A, Lang
antagonists according to cytochrome P-450 2D6 genotypes. J NP, Hauer-Jensen M. Effect of thalidomide on gastrointesti-
Clin Oncol 2002 Jun 15; 20(12): 2805-11. nal toxic effects of irinotecan. Lancet 2000 Aug 12; 356(9229):
542 OY

566-7. 285-290.
129. Savarese D, Al Zoubi A, Boucher J. Glutamine for irinotecan 144. Asvury RF, Rosenthal SN, Descalzi . Hepatic veno-occlu-
diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 2000 Jan; 18(2): 450-1. sive disease due to DTIC. Cancer 1980; 45: 2670-2674.
130. Kehrer DF, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, de Bruijn P, Nierop 145. Lazarus , Cottfuied MR, Herzig RH, et al. Veno-occlusi-
CA, van de Schraaf, Ruijrok EJ, de Jonge MJ. Modulation of ve disease of the liver after high-dose mitomycin-c therapy and
irinotecan-induced diarrhea by cotreatment with neomycin in autologous bone marrw transplantation. Cancer 1982; 49:
cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2001 May; 7(5): 1136-41. 1789-1795.
131. Evas , Golstein MJ, Sherlock . Candida infections of the 146. McDonald GB, Sharma , Matthews D, et al. The clinical
gastrointestinal tract. Medicine 1972; 51: 367-379. course of 53 patients with veno-occlusive disease of the liver
132. Bodey GPL. Fungal infections complicating acute leukemia. J after marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1985; 39: 603-
Chronic Dis 1966; 19: 667-687. 608.
133. Donaldson SS, Castro JR, Wilbur JR, et al. Rhabdomyosarco- 147. Ayash LF, Hunt , Antman , et al. Hepatic veno-occlusive
ma of head and neck in children: Combination treatment by disease in autologous bone marrw transplantation of solid
surgery, irradiation and chemotherapy. Cancer 1973; 31: 26- tummors and lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 1699-1706.
35. 148. Griner , Elhadawi , Packman C. Veno-occlusive disease of
134. Donaldson SS, Jundt S, Ricour C, et al. Radiation enteritis in the liver after chemotherapy of acute leukemia: a report of
children: retrospective review, clinicopathologic correlation two cases. nn Intern Med 1976; 85: 578-582.
and dietary management. Cancer 1975; 35: 1167-1178. 149. Shulman , McDonald GB, Matthews DE, et al. n analy-
135. Donaldson SS, Lenon RA. Alteration of nutritional status. sis of hepatic veno-occlusive disease and centrilobular hepatic
The impact of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Cancer degeneration following bone marrow transplantation. Gastro-
1978; 43: 2036-2052. enterology 1980; 79: 1178-1191.
136. Mallory , Kern F. Drug induced pancreatitis. clinical re- 150. Phillips GL, Fay JW, Herzig GP, et al. Intensive 1,3-Bis (2-
view. Gastroenterology 1980; 78: 813-819. chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), NSC 4366650 and cryo-
137. Newman CE, Ellis DJ. Pancreatitis during combination che- preserved autologous marrow transplantation for refractory
motherapy. Clin Oncol 1979; 5: 83-89. cancer: a phase I-II study. Cancer 1983; 52: 1792-1802.
138. Purkett J , Butler WM, acfarland JA. Pancreatitis an com- 151. Lazarus H, Gottfried MR, Herzing RH, et al. Veno-occlusive
bination chemotherapy. nn Intern Med 1982; 97: 453. disease of the liver after high-dose mitomycin-c therapy and
139. Yeung , Haidak DJ, Brown JA, Anderson D. Metastasis autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer 1982; 49:
induces acute pancreatitis in small cell bronchogenic carcino- 1789-1795.
ma. Arch ntern Med 1978; 139: 552. 152. Baglin , Harper , Marcus RE. Veno-occlusive disease of
140. Shivshandker , Chu DZ, Stroehlein JR, Nelson RS. Gastro- the liver complicating. successfully treated with recom-
intestinal hemrrhage in the cancer patients. Gastrointest En- binant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Bone Marrow
dosc 1983; 29: 273. Transplant 1990; 5: 439-441.
141. Zinner MJ, Zuidema GD, Smith PL, Miguosa . The preven- 153. Teicher , Grawford JM, Holden SA, et al. Glutathione mo-
tion of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in patients in an noetheyl can selectively protect liver from high-dose BCNU
intensive care unit. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 153: 214. or cyclophosphamide. Cancer 1988; 62: 1275-1281.
142. Jeliffe DB, Bras G, Mukherjec KL. Veno-occlusive disease of 154. McDonald GB, Schulman , Sullivan , Spencer GD.
the liver and indian childhood cirrhosis. Arch Dis Child 1957; Intestinal and hepatic complications of human bone marrow
32: 369-385. transplantation. Gastroenterology 1986; 90: 460-447.
143. Wood WG, Dehner LP, Nesbit . Fatal veno-occlusive di- 155. Martin J, Schoch G, Fisher L, et al. retrospective analysis
sease of the liver following high-dose chemotherapy, irradia- of therapy for acute graft versus-host disease: initial treat-
tin and bone marrow transplantation. Ann J Med 1980; 68: ment. Blood 1990; 76: 1464-1472.

OOO , -
- . -
- , -
. ,
. - -
, , ,
- , .. (. 29).
, - -
,
- -
VII. 543

, -
29.
- .

, :
1.
.
2. -


-
.
3. , -
, -

.
4. -
(. 30). , -
- ,
-
- , .
: O
1. . -
- G0
.
,
.
2. O - . -
- -
, - -
. ,
3. - 1.

30.

1. 4. O 6. O

-



- -

7.
()
()
- ( )

2. 5.
-


3.
-

544 OY

H OA 10 11 -
- 12.
- 13. O
.
-
, . 14,
- 15. -

, , - , , ,
, . -
(tingling)
. . ,
. .
, -
, - ,
. -
- -
(300600 .
mg/m2) -
. O , Lhermitte,
-
(demylination)2, 16. -
. -
3, - .
. - -
, - , -
30100%, 57%2,13. - 1030 -
- , , -
400 mg/m2, - -
4. .
,
. . -
, -
. (
. )17.
5, ,
- . -
. - > 1.000 mg Lhermitte
, 18.
, , -
, , -
, ACTH Org 27666,7, .
8 -L-9. - 8590% 19.
,
100300 mg/m2 , - ,
. 12% ---
1620% .
, -
88% . O (> 130 mg/m2)
Crti , . O
. , -
-- 20. -
VII. 545

-
21. - .
-
780850 mg/m2. 25. -
3/4 22. -
- , , -
.
56 mg
- . O -
. - -
1520 mg . - ,
-
, 26.
13 . -
, -
, , .. -
. - (leptomeningeal carcinomatosis).
-

.
27.
, , , O
. -
, -
, - .
, - ,
.
(axonal transport). -
,
. O , -
, .
(- 28-30.
, )
- , -
- , , -,
. . -
23. -
- ,
, , . -
. -
- -
, . - ,
-
, - 31.
, ,
- , -
, Charcot-Marie-Tooth -
24. ( .. ),
-
. -
. , , -
546 OY

, - , Lambert-Eaton, -
. - .. -
60% -
250 mg/m2, . -
10%32. ,
39.
. O ,
. - OI OA
, -
. - -
33 - , 34
, - 72 . -
. ,
34. - , , ,
. - 40. 540% -
- . -
. , - . -
, -
, - .
-. - . ,
- , , , , ,
. , ,
. - . -
.
- 41. , -
.
Suramin . -
, , -
. - 42, -
10% 35. - .
: - -
Guillain-Barre - .
.
9% O OA
36. 1970
- -
37 ( ), - ,
( ), - -
( 30% - ,
)38 , ( ).
, -
OA , , , ,
7% , . -
- -
. , , -
, . O - , ,
- 43.
-
, - (disseminated necrotizing leuko-
. encephalopathy).
, , ,
VII. 547

(gliosis) -
44. - 16 -
2-- .
. -
- -
, - -
- DPD
, , - -
- 50,51.
- -
.
- . -
, , -
. - - 647% -
15% , - 38 -
. . -
, , , - -
, . - . -
-
. v45-46. -, --
- 48.
-
- - OI OA
. O -
- . -
. , -
(), . -
- 15
, - 40% . -
. -
O - .
-
, . -
, , , -
,
, . -
. O - -
, ( )
-
. . -
-
OY O YOO , , , -
- - .
, , , -
-47.
- . -
-
. (DPD),
, , , ,
31,48, 8090% 52,53.
49.
548 OY

. - -
1030% - . , -
, - , -
, , , , -
. .
2 , -
13 . , , ,
, , , , , - .
, - - , -
, . , 58,
-
- . -2
. (capillary leak
- syndrome)
. O - ,
, , - .
,
, , YOO OO E -
OH OO
54. -
. (inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion
- SADH) -
, - . -
-
. - ,
. O -
. -
55.
- , -

-
. -
56.
- 412

. , - 20 59,60.
, 61.
, -
-
.
- .
-
4355% , -
57. - 62,63.


1. Kaplan RS, Wiernick . Neurotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs. 3. MacDonald DR. Neurologic complications of chemotherapy.
Semin Oncol 1982; 9: 103-130. Neurol Clin 1991 Nov; 9(4): 955-67.
2. Thompson SW, Davis LE, Kornfeld , et al. Cisplatin neuro- 4. Van der Hoop RG, van der Burg ME, ten Bokkel Huinick
pathy: Clinical electrophysiologic, morphologic and toxicolo- WW, van Houwelingen C, Neijt JP. Incidence of neuropathy
gic studies. Cancer 1984; 54: 1269-1275. in 395 patients with ovarian cancer treated with or without cis-
VII. 549

platin. Cancer 1990 Oct 15; 66(8): 1697-702. Baldelli AM, Beretta GD, Ubiali E, Catalano G. Neuroprote-
5. Siegal T, Haim N. Cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. ctive effect of reduced glutathione on oxaliplatin-based che-
Frequent off-therapy deterioration, demyelinating syndromes motherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized, dou-
and muscle cramps. Cancer 1990 Sep 15; 66(6): 1117-23. ble blind, placebo controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2002 Aug 15;
6. Mollman JE, Glover DJ, Hogan WM, Furman RE. Cisplatin 20(16): 3478-83.
neuropathy. Risk factors, prognosis, and protection by WR2721. 22. Cassidy J, Misset JL. Oxaliplatin-related side effects: characte-
Cancer 1988; 61: 2192-2195. ristics and management. Semin Oncol 2002 Oct; 29 (5 Suppl
7. Gerrusen van der op R, Vecht CJ, van de Burg MEL, et al. 15): 11-20.
Prevention of cisplatin neurotoxicity with an ACTh analogue 23. Garewal HS, Dalton WS. Metoclopramide in vincristine-in-
in patients with ovarian cancer. Engl J Med 1990; 322: 89-94. duced ileus. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 1309-1312.
8. Leonetti C, Biroccio A, Gabllini C, Scarsella M, Maresca V, 24. Slyter , Liwnicz , Herrick , et al. Fatal myeloencephalo-
Flori E, Bove L, Pace A, Stoppacciaro A, Zupi G, Cognetti F, pathy caused by intrathecal vincristine. Neurology 1980; 30:
Picardo M. Alphatocopherol against cisplatin-induced toxici- 867-871.
ty without interfering with antitumor efficacy. Int J cancer 2003 25. Holland JF, Schariau C, Gailani S, et al. Vincristine treatment
Mar 20; 104(2): 243-50. of advanced cancer. cooperative study of 392 patients. Can-
9. Pisano C, Pratesi G, Laccabue D, Zunino F, Lo Giudice P, cer Res 1973; 33: 1258-1264.
Bellucci A, Pacifici L, Camerini B, Cavaletti G. Paclitaxel and 26. Sandler SG, Tobin W, Henderson ES. Vincristine-induced
cisplatin induced neurotoxicity: a possible role of acetyl-L-car- neuropathy. Neurology 1969; 19: 367-374.
nitine. Clin Cancer Res 2003 Nov 15; 9(15): 5756-67. 27. Jackson DV, Wells , Atkins JN, et al. Amelioration of vin-
10. Feghali JG, Liu W, Van De Water TR. L-n-acetylcysteine pro- cristine neurotoxicity by glutamic acid. Am J Med 1988; 84:
tection against cisplatin-induced auditory neuronal and hair 1016-1022.
cell toxicity. Laryngoscope 2001 Jul; 111(7): 1147-55. 28. Gasey EG, Jelliffe , LeQuesne , Millett YC. Vincristine
11. Kalkanis JG, Whitworth C, Rybak LP. Vitamin E reduces cis- neuropathy clinical and electrophysiological observations. Brain
platin ototoxicity. Laryngoscope 2004 Mar; 114(3): 538-42. 1973; 96: 69-86.
12. Reser D, Rho M, Dewan D, Herbst L, Li G, Stupak H, Zur K, 29. Weiss HD, Walker MD, Wietnik PH. Neurotoxicity of com-
Romaine J, Frenz D, Kopke R, Arezzo J, Van Der Water T. L- monly used antineoplastic agents. New Engl J Med 1974; 291:
and D-methionine provide equivalent long term protection 75-81.
against CDDP-induced ototoxicity in vivo, with partial in vitro 30. Owellen RJ, Hartke CA, Dickerson RM, Hains F. Inhibition
and in vivo retention of antineoplastic activity. Neurotoxicity of tubulin-microtubule polymerization by drugs of the vinca
1999 Oct; 20(5): 731-48. alkalodi class. Cancer Res 1976; 36: 1499-1502.
13. Lippman AJ, Helson C, Helson L, et al. Clinical trials of cis- 31. Weiss HD, Walker MD, Wiernik PH. Neurotoxicity of com-
platin. Cancer Chemother Rep 1973; 57: 191-200. monly used antineoplastic agents (parts I and II). New Engl J
14. Feum LG, Wallace S, Stewart DJ, et al. Intracarotid infusion Med 1974; 291: 75-81.
of cisdiaminodichloroplatinum in the treatment of recurrent 32. Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K, Kulp B, Peterson G, Be-
mallignant brain tumors. Cancer 1984; 54: 794-799. linson J. Neurotoxicity associated with a regimen of carbopla-
15. Miller DF, Bay JW, Lederman RJ, et al. Ocular and orbital tin (AUC 5-6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) em-
toxicity following intracarotid injection of BCNU and cisplati- ployed in the treatment of gynaecologic malignancies. J Can-
num for malignant gliomas. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 402-406. cer Res Clin Oncol 2001 Jan; 127(1): 55-8.
16. Walther PJ, Rossitch , Bullard DE. The development of 33. Freiligh RJ, Balmaceda C, Seidman AD, Rubin M, DeAngelis
Lhermittes sign during cisplatin chemotherapy. Cancer 1987; LM. Motor neuropathy due to docetaxel and paclitaxel. Neu-
60: 2170-2172. rology 1996 Jul; 17(1): 115-8.
17. Heinzlef O, Lotz JP, Roullet E. Severe neuropathy after high- 34. Perry JR, Warner E. Transient encephalopathy after paclitaxel
dose carboplatin in three patients receiving multidrug chemo- (Taxol) infusion. Neurology 1996 Jun; 46(6): 1596-9.
therapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998 May; 64(5): 667-9. 35. La Rocca RV, Meer J, Gilliat RW, Stein CA, Cassidy J, Myers
18. Taieb S, Trillet-Lenoir V, Rambaud L, Descos L, Freyer G. CE, Dalakas MC. Suramin induced polyneuropathy. Neurolo-
Lhermittes sign and urinary retention; a typical presentation gy 1990 Jun; 40(6): 954-60.
of oxaliplatine neurotoxicity in four patients. Cancer 2002 May 36. Hussain M, Fisher El, Petrylak DP, OConnor J, Wood DP,
1; 94(9): 2434-40. Small EJ, Eisenberger MA, Crawford ED. Androgen depriva-
19. Gamelin E, Gamelin L, Bossi L, Quasthoff S. Clinical and mo- tion and four courses of fixed schedule suramin treatment in
lecular basis of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity: Current management patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: A
and development of preventive measures. Seminar Oncol 2002 Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2000 Mar;
Oct; 29 (5 Suppl 15): 21-33. 18(5): 1043-9.
20. Wilson RH, Lehky T, Thomas RR, Quinn MG, Floeter MG, 37. Chaudhry V, Cornblath DR, Corse A, Freimer M, Simmons-
Grem JL. Acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral nerve hyperex- OBrien E, Vogelsang G. Thalidomide-induced neuropathy.
citability. J Clin Oncol 2002 Apr 1; 20(7): 1767-74. Neurology 2002 Dec 24; 59(12): 1872-5.
21. Cescinu S, Catalano S, Cordella L, Labianca R, Giordani P, 38. Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Benerson J, et al. A phase 2 study
550 OY

of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med rotoxicity. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 36: 152-154.
2003; 348: 2609-17. 52. Takimoto CH, Lu ZH, Zhang R, Liang MD, Larson LV, Can-
39. Young DF, Posner JB. Nervous system toxicity of the chemo- tilena LR, Grem JL, Allegra CJ, Diasio RB, Chu E. Severe
therapeutic agents. In: Vinken J, Bruyn GW, eds. Handbook neurotoxicity following 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in
of clinical neurology. New York: North Holland, 1980: 91-129. a patient with dihydropirimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Clin
40. Bleyer W, Drake JC, Chabner . Neurotoxicity and ele- Cancer Res 1996 Mar; 2(3): 477-81.
vated cerebrospianal-fluid methotrexate concentration in me- 53. , , , ,
ningeal leukemia. Engl J Med 1973; 289: 770-773. .
41. Cagliano RG, Costanzi JJ. Paraplegia following intrathecal me- -
thotrexate. Cancer 1976; 37: 1663-1668. 5-. 2001; 80(5): 446-
42. Koh S, Nelson MD Jr, Kovanlikaya A, Chen LS. Anterior lum- 450.
bosacral radiculopathy after intrathecal methotrexate treatment. 54. Tuxen , Hansen SW. Neurotoxicity secondary to antineo-
Pediatr Neurol 1999 Aug; 21(2): 576-8. plastic drugs. Cancer Treat Rev 1994; 20: 191-214.
43. Bleyer W, Griffin TW. White matter necrosis, mineralizing 55. Vassal G, Deroussent , Hartmann O, et al. Dose dependent
microangiopathy and intellectual abilities in survivors of child- neurotoxicity, of high-dose busulfan in children: clinical and
hood leukemia. In: Gilbert , Kagan AR, eds. Radiation da- pharmacological study. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 6203-6207.
mage to the nervous system. delayed therapeutic hazard. 56. Wolff SN, Herzig RH, Fay JW, et al. Thiotepa with autologous
New York: Raven Press, 1980: 155-174. bone marrow transplantation: Phase I studies. Semin Oncol
44. Rubinstein LJ, Herman , Long TF, Wibur JR. Disseminat- 1990; 17 (Suppl. 3): 2-6.
ed necrotizing leukoncephalopathy. complication of treated 57. Singhal S, Metha J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddle-
central nervous system. Cancer 1975; 35: 291. mon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, Zed-
45. Pectasides D, Barbounis V, Athanassiou , Mariatos . Cere- dis J, Barlogie B. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refra-
brovascular accidents following hormonochemotherapy in can- ctory myeloma. N Engl J Med 1999 Nov 18; 341(21): 1565-71.
cer patients. Am J Clin Oncol 1992; 15 (2): 168-173. 58. Rohatiner AZ, Prior PF, Burton AC, Smith AT, Balkwill FR,
46. Pectasides D, Barbounis V, Alevizakos , Athanassiou . Lister TA. Central nervous system toxicity of interferon. Br J
Transient cerebral dysfunction after treatment with moderate- Cancer 1983 Mar; 47(3): 419-22.
ly high-dose methotrexate. Annals of Oncology 1991; 2 (10): 59. De Fronzo RA, Braine , Colvin O, et al. Water intoxica-
769. tion in man after cyclophosphamide therapy. nn Intern Med
47. Nand S, Messmore HL, Patel R. Neurotoxicity associated with 1973; 178: 861-869.
systemic high-dose cytosine arabinoside. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 60. Steele , Serpick , Block JB. Antidiuretic response to cy-
571-575. clophosphamide in man. J Pharm xp Ther 1973; 185: 245-
48. Riehf JB, Brown WJ. Acute cerebellar syndrome secondary to 253.
5-FU therapy. Neurology 1964; 14: 961-967. 61. Green , Mircken BL. Prevention of cyclophosphamide-in-
49. Moertal CG, Reitemeier RJ, Bolton CF, Shorter RG. Cerebel- duced antidiuresis by furosemide infusion. Clin Pharmacol Ther
lar ataxia associated with fluorinated pyrimide therapy. Cancer 1981; 29: 634.
Chemother Rep 1964; 41: 14-18. 62. Robertson GL, Bhoopalam , Zelkowitz LJ. Vincristine neu-
50. Diasio RB, Beavers TL, Carpenter JT. Familial deficiency of rotoxicity and abnormal secretion of antidiuretic hormone.
dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. Biochemical basis for fami- Arch ntern Med 1973; 132: 717-720.
lial pyrimidinemia and severe 5-fluorouracil-induced toxicity. J 63. Stuart MJ, Cuaso C, Miller , Oski FA. Syndrome of recur-
Clin Invest 1988; 81: 4751. rent increased secretion of antidiuretic hormone following mul-
51. Moore DH, Fowler WCJr, Crumpler LS. 5-Fluorouracil neu- tiple doses of vincristine. Blood 1975; 45: 315-320.

OO OI .
OA , -
OI OA , -
, -
. -
-
, , , -
, , ..
Hodgkin, , -
311-3. O -
- ,
VII. 551

Spitz
31. -
19486. O -
, -

o


.

, -
.
-
, - 400 mg -
, ,
400 mg,
( ) - 7. -
. , -
, -
OE OI
, 6
O H A
10 g8. 18 gr -
O .
. O - 1973 Sherins De Vita9 -

- .
, - CVP O -
FSH LH. - .
-

. ,
(germinal deple- .
tion), 32 -
, . -
Ser-
toli. -
, - 32. -
-
v
.
-
-
+
4. , + +
12 . + +
- + +
. + +
+ ;
Leydig,
# ;
, - # ;
, - - # ;
- # ;
LH. O



, ;
, - ; ;
5.
(+) , (#) , () , (;)
-
552 OY

, , , - .
, , - O Peckham . -
- 23 -
, , , 1
25%.
, .
- .
> 400 mg/m2 -
. 19. Charing Cross20
O O (, , POMB / ACE (, , , -
), , , -D, -
Hodgkin, ) 1272 49%
80% .
10-12. O - , ,
VD (, , , -
) -
O Hodg- ,
kin - Sertoli Leydig.
, . -
13 FSH, 5 -
35% ABVD, , LH
, 100%, O - -
. , . o
O . FSH , LH
,
- 19739. FSH -
,
Hodgkin14. , , -
Hodgkin FSH -
. FSH -
2030%
15. inhibin Sertoli 21.
-
, - Leydig, LH-RH L
. Einhorn16 69 , -
, , (V , L , -
). . O
96% . L
23 , ,
- -
. - Leydig.
40 25
8 . 46% - 40 46% -
FSH, 75% L 75% -
. - .
17. 16-17.

, I OI H-
- H
. 77% -
17% 18.
VII. 553

, >3540 28,29.
- -
, - -
. .
-
196022 -
. - FSH, L (2)
- .
-
, - OE OI A
, - -
. -
, , , -
. - , -
33 .
. -
v
, -

23. 1971 -
- ,
,
24. . -
- -
- -
- . O -
(> 40), - -
- ,
, 25. FSH LH 30.
- . O
Henle et al31 n -
26. 25 -
O -
, - 2 . 70%
4050% 80% -
27. - . Au-
- bier32
< 25 , -
. ,

33. - ,


,
Leydig.
-


.



K-
-



. -
554 OY

-
33,34, - .
1
> 80% - 42 -
35 ,
, -
. . -
44,
- . 9 -
. , 50% -
- Hodgkin, Holmes Holmes45 -
- . -
36. O Byrne et al37 - 46,
2.000 - .
. - ,
,
, -
, . - , -
- .
,
. O OH A O
OI
OO A AO I ,
-
- . O -
38. -
- ,
- -
. O - , .. VD
(< 25 ), 39. Hodgkin.
.
OI O -
O OOO ,
- -
, - .
. - -
, - .
, Hodgkin -
. -
, .
. . -
- , -
. 40,41 20
- 106 /ml 50%. -
- ,
-
, .
16. Blatt 1980 Chapman , 2
198242,43 .
-
, .
VII. 555

.
- , -
.
, , - , -
n -
- ,
- 48.
. , LH-RH -
-
, -
n- .
, - ,
. - , -
- 49,50.
47. , - -
- -
. -
, , -
.

1. Robaire , Hales BF. Effects of paternal exposure to antican- 12. Charak BS, Gupta R, Mandrekar , et al. Testicular dysfun-
cer drugs on pregnancy outcome. An animal model. In: Mulvi- ction after cyclophosphamide -vincristine -procarbazine -pred-
hill JJ, Sherins RJ, eds. Reproductive Consequences of Cancer nisolone chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkins disease.
and Cancer Therapy. New York: Roven Press, 1988. long-term follow up study. Cancer 1990; 65: 1903.
2. Schilsky RJ, Lewis BJ, Sherins RJ, et al. Gonadal dysfunction 13. Vivani S, Santoro , Ragri G, et al. Gonadal toxicity after
in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Ann Intern Med combination chemotherapy for Hodgkins disease: Comparati-
1980; 93: 109. ve results of O vs ABVD. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1985;
3. Sieber SM, Adamson RH. Toxicity of antineoplastic agents in 2: 601.
man. Chromosomal aberrations, antifertility effects, congeni- 14. Rueffer U, Breuer K, Josting A, et al. Male gonadal dysfun-
tal malformations, and carcinogenic-potential. Adv Cancer Res ction in patients with Hodgkins disease prior to treatment.
1975; 12: 57. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 1307-11.
4. Meistrich ML. Relationship between spermatogonial stem cell 15. Redman JR, Bajorunas DR, Goldstein MC, Evenson DP,
survival and testis function after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Br J Gralla RJ, Lacher MJ, Koziner B, Lee BJ, Straus DJ, Clarkson
Cancer Suppl 1986; 7: 89-101. BD, et al. Semen cryopreservation and artificial insemination
5. Quershi MJA, Goldsmith HJ, Pennington HJ, et al. Cyclopho- for Hodgkins disease. J Clin Oncol 1987 Feb; 5(2): 233-8.
sphamide therapy and sterility. Lancet 1972; 2: 1290. 16. Drasga RE, Einhorn LH, Williams SD, et al. Fertility after
6. Spitz S. The histological effects of nitrogen mustards on hu- chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Journal of Clinical Onco-
man tumors and tissues. Cancer 1948; 1: 383-398. logy 1983; 1 (3): 179-183.
7. Richter , Calamera JC, Morgengeld MD, et al. Effect on 17. Johnson DH, Hainsworth JD, Linde RB, et al. Testicular fun-
chlorambucil on spermatogenesis in the human with malignant ction following combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, vin-
lymphoma. Cancer 1970; 25: 1026. blastine and bleomycin. Medical and Pediatric Oncology 1984;
8. Fairly KF, Barrie JU, Johnson W. Sterility and testicular atro- 12: 233-238.
phy related to cyclophosphamide therapy. Lancet 1972; 1: 568. 18. Dragsa RE, Einhorn LH, Williams SD, et al. Fertility after
9. Sherins RJ, De Vita VT, Jr. Effect of drug treatment for lym- chemotherapy for testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 1983; 1: 179-
phoma on male reproductive capacity. Annals of Internal Me- 83.
dicine 1973; 79: 216-220. 19. Pont J, Albrecht W. Fertility after chemotherapy for testicular
10. Waxman JHX, Terry , Wrigley PFM, et al. Gonadal fun- germ cell cancer. Fertil Steril 1997 Jul; (1): 1-5.
ction in Hodgkins disease. Long-term follow up of chemothe- 20. , , Rustin G, . -
rapy. Br Med J 1982; 285: 1612. .
11. Whitehead , Shalet SM, Blackledge G, et al. The effects of 1988; 53: 651-656.
Hodgkins disease and combination chemotherapy on gonadal 21. Anawalt BD, Bebb RA, Matsumoto AM, Groome NP, Illing-
function in the adult male. Cancer 1982; 49: 418. worth PJ, McNeilly AS, Bremmer WJ. Serum inhibin B levels
556 OY

reflect Sertoli cell function in normal men and men with testi- 36. Nikosia SV, Mauts-Ridley , Meadows . Gonadal effects of
cular dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996 Sep; 81(9): cancer therapy in girls. Cancer 1985; 55: 2364-2372.
3341-5. 37. Burne J, Mulvihill JJ, Myers . Effects of treatment n ferti-
22. Belohorsky , Siracky J, Sandor L, et al. Comments on the de- lity in long-term survivors of childhood or adolescent cancer.
velopment of amenorrhea caused by myleran in cases of chro- Engl J Med 1987; 313: 1315-1321.
nic myelosis. Neoplasma 1960; 4: 397-402. 38. Chatterjee R, Goldstone AH. Gonadal damage and effects on
23. Warne GL, Fairly , Hoobbs JB, et al. Cyclophosphamide- fertility in adult patients with haematological malignancy un-
induced ovarian failure. Engl J Med 1973; 289: 1159. dergoing stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant
24. Sobrihno LG, Levine RA, DeConti RC, et al. Amenorrhea in 1996 Jan; 17(1): 5-11.
patients with Hodgkins disease treated with antineoplastic 39. Grigg AP, McLachlan R, Zaja J, Szer J. Reproductive status in
agents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 109: 135. long-term bone marrow transplant survivors receiving busul-
25. Fisher , Sherman , Rockette , et al. L-phenylananine mu- fan-cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg). Bone Marrow Transplant
stard in the management of premenopausal patients with pri- 2000 Nov; 26(10): 1089-95.
mary breast cancer. Cancer 1979; 44: 847. 40. Li FP, Fine W, Jaffe , et al. Offspring of patients treated for
26. Chapman RM, Sutcliff SB, Malpas JS. Cytotoxic-induced ova- cancer in childhood. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 1193-1197.
rian failure in women with Hodgkins disease. JAMA 1979; 41. Rustin GJS, Botth , Dent J, et al. Pregnancy after cytotoxic
241: 1880-1881. chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic tumours. British
27. Horning SJ, Hoppe RT, Kaplan HS, et al. Female reproducti- Medical Journal 1984; 1284: 103-106.
ve potentiale after treatment for Hodgkins disease. Engl J 42. Blatt J, Julvihill JJ, Jiegler JL, et al. Pregnancy out-come fol-
Med 1982; 304: 1378. lowing cancer chemotherapy. American Journal 1980; 69: 828-
28. Schilsky RL, Sherins RJ, Hubbard SM, et al. Long-term follow 832.
up of ovarian function in women treated with O chemo- 43. Chapman R. Effect of cytotoxic therapy n sexuality and go-
therapy for Hodgkins disease. Am J Med 1981; 71: 552. nad function. Seminars in Oncology 1982; 9,1: 84-89.
29. Whitehead , Shalet SM, Blackledge G, et al. The effect of 44. Senturia YD, Peckham CS, Peckham MJ. Children fathered by
combinantion chemotherapy on ovarian function in women men treated for testicular cancer. Lancet 1985: 766-769.
treated for Hodgkins disease. Cancer 1983; 52: 988. 45. Holmes GE, Holmes FF. Pregnancy outcome of patients treat-
30. Whitehead , Shalet SM, Morris-Jones , et al. Gonadal ed not Hodgkins disease. Cancer 1978; 41: 1317-1322.
function after combination disease in childhood. Arch Dis 46. McKeen , Mulvihill JJ, Rosner F, et al. Pregnant outcome
Child 1981; 47: 287. in Hodgkins disease. Lancet 1979: 590.
31. Henle TW, Burbige , Shepard BR. Chemotherapy and its 47. Radford JA, Lieberman BA, Brison DR, Smith AR, Critch-
effects n testicular morphology in children. Urology 1984; clow JD, Russell SA, Watson AJ, Clayton JA, Harris M, Gos-
131: 1142-1144. den RG, Shalet SM. Orthotopic reimplantation of cryopre-
32. Aubier F, Flamant F, Branmer R, et al. Male gnadal function served ovarian cortical strips after high-dose chemotherapy for
after chemotherapy for solid tumors in children. J Clin Oncol Hodgkins lymphoma. Lancet 2001 Apr 14; 357(9263): 1172-5.
1989; 7: 304-309. 48. Glode LM, Robinson J, Gould SF. Protection from cyclophos-
33. Chiu J, Drummond . Long-term follow up of cyclophos- phamide-induced testicular damage with an analogue of gona-
phamide therapy in frequent relapsing minimal lesion nephro- dotrophin releasing hormone. Lancet 1981; 1: 1132-1134.
tic syndrome. J Pediatr 1974; 84: 825. 49. Johnson DH, Linda R, Hainsworth JD. Effect of luteinizing,
34. De Grot GW, Faiman C, Winter JSD. Cyclophosphamide and hormone releasing hormone agonist given during combination
the prepubertal gonad: negative report. J Pediatr 1974; 84: chemotherapy n post therapy fertility in male patients with
123-125. lymphoma. Preliminary observations. Blood 1985; 65: 832-836.
35. Siris EJ, Leventhal BG, Vaitukaitis JL. Effects of childhood 50. Chapman RM, Sutcliffe SB. Protection of ovarian function by
leukemia and chemotherapy n puberty and reproductive fun- oral contracaptives in women receiving chemotherapy for
ction in girls. Engl J Med 1976; 294: 1143. Hodgkins disease. Blood 1981; 58: 849-851.

. .

( de novo)
- . -
- -
. - ,
- -
, -
- ,
.
- . -
, (, multidrug resistance
MDR).
. O
, de novo -
. -
- .
, Hodgkin, O
Hodgkins ,
. O
, , . -

, , -
, -
-
,
--

(. 1). O
. -
,
, ,
-

, .
-
, 1.
. 1. 2.
-

. - O

-

, , -
, -
- DNA
.

557
558 OY

O O -
,
, .
, , -
, , -
.
, - .
-

, -
. 10.000
,
100.000 ,
-
. -
, DNA
-
, (. 1).
,
. O
O
.
- , -
, -
. - .
, , -
, -
. , .
, - ,
1,2. -
- , -
- -
Hodgkins - . -
2.
- , -
. .
,
, -
-. , 3-6.

DNA


-


1. .
VII. 559


- 9,10.
. O-
- O
. -
-
, DNA11,12.
- , -
3,5,6. -
- -
DNA.
, - DNA
-
. O - 13,14.

, . -

O OO
. ,
-
DNA, -
. , -
DNA15.
, -
. -DNA
- -
, -
, ()16.
- O -
.
.
-
-
, -17-20.
. - -
- ,
6-, ,
-, 5-. - ,
, . -
- -
. (p53, p21, bax, bcl-2)
-
-, 21-23.
-
. OOOO O OO
- -
, CPT-11 (), -
- -
, .
CPT-11 SN-387,8. -
- - -
560 OY

, GST
- .
. -
, . Na+--
-
. , Na+--
. - .
,
GSH-x, ATP-
DNA. MRP131-37.
- GSH GST -
,
- , , ,
24. .
-
, , -
, 25-30.
BSO,
O -
(. 2).

. OO O
()
O OO
-
- .
- 1970
.
- (.. -
/ -S- (GSH /GST). ), -
GSH -

, (.. , -
. ). o-
- , 1976 Juliano Ling -



De novo



BCNU

GSH


GSH




( GSTs)

Na+
MRP (GSH-x)

2. (GSH/GST).
VII. 561

170- ABC (ATP-


kd 38. binding cassette) (. 3). -
- 4/11
-
. - (MHC), -
(CFTR),
, (SUR)
(.. - ItpgpA, -
)39. - -
40,41. -
, - ,
. - ,
.
- P-gp -
P-gp (Permeability glycoprotein P-gp) - -
- 7,
, MRP (MDR-related protein (MDR 1, MDR 2/3) (mdr 1,
MRP). mdr 2, mdr 3)42,43. -
P-gp
. -
,
- , -
. Golgi44. O
MDR 1 -
- , MDR 2/3 -
- .
. MDR 1 -
. MDR 1
O O , , , -
O -gp , , , -
H P-gp 1976 , -
- -
38. P-gp ,
170-kDa - 45-47. P-gp

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A B A
B
ATP ATP
site site

S S



2

COOH
D1 NBD2

3. -.
562 OY

2. O P-gp

- -
. -


mRNA
Vinca 58. O -
P-gp 50%59,60.
C
OOO O
-D O P-gp

Ethidium Bromide H P-gp
() -
2 . -

P-gp
, ,
, - C,
61.
, 46. -
P-gp -
-
-
P-gp (.. ), -
1990. -
-
-
(. 2).
, -
MDR 1
62.
(O),
O P-gp , -
() -
, , -
. P-gp -
,
-
P-gp -
P-gp48,49 (. 2). - , -
- .
P-gp P-gp
50-51. .
P-gp ( , - O P-gp,
, - , , (PSC 833)
, , Wilms) - (VX-710), -
, - . O -
PSC 833, -
52,53. -
1020 . -
P-gp -
P-gp PSC 833
. - 20%
63,64. -
- P-gp
-
. - 65,66.
(, , - -
), (.. ), -
(.. ) - .
(PSC 833) 54-57.
VII. 563

, 3. O MRP
(34) P450,
-
.


P-gp, , MRP 1. - Vinca

, - O

- -

, LTC4
P- GSH
gp, 67,68.
O
MDR 181. MRP -
-
, , , -
, -
, -
-
82,83, -
69. O
MRP P-gp84,85. MRP,
P450
P-gp, -
P-gp, -
ABC,
70,71. -

- 81. MRP

. O- (Multispe-
P-gp cific Organic Anion Transporter MOAT),
- MRP 1 MRP 2, MRP
(XR 9576), (LY 35979), - 3, MRP 4, MRP 586. MRP 1 -
(R 101933) O-09372-76. -
O XR 9576 87. O
P-gp. P-gp RP 1
, -
. XR 9576 ,
48 ,
, -
, 77,78. - MRP1 (. 3). MRP 1
, - -
, . , P-gp88. H
XR 9576 - MRP 1
73-76. .
, --
O O 4 (LTC4) -
MRP 1, 2, ,
, ,
P-gp -
. MRP - 89,90.
,
H69 79,80. MRP 1 (
16p13.1 - ), -
190- MRP 1. H RP 1
kDa, -
, -
. MRP 1 15%
564 OY

, - . -
87. - LRP
MRP 1 P-gp MRP 1
, P-gp , ,
91. , ,
mRNA MRP 106.
, , ,
, , . O
92,93. - LRP -
, , , - , P-gp MRP45. O
. O - LRP
MRP - P-
. O MRP - gp MRP (, ),
(O, O, ) -
( )94- , , -
96. MRP
107. LRP
-
, - , ,
96-98. O O108,109.
-

(5%
C 60% ),
- 110.
. -
MHC1, O
99,100. - O
(tap-1 tap-
O O OOO-
2) -

. tap-1
tap-2 tap - O DNA -
, -
101. - DNA.
. DNA , -
DNA
O 111. O -
O LRP DNA, -
(Lung-Resistance Protein) , -
- DNA. -
, - :
. - DNA,
ABC - -
DNA.
. , ,
LRP (17q21 3q
P-gp. H LRP )
102,103. . -
S, - -
, - -
- 25. O
104,105. , -
- , ,
VII. 565

(, ), - -
(mAMSA), (), -DNA.
(-), - -
(, ), -
(-). - -,
-
.
DNA-- -DNA,
(cleavable complex). H - .
- , - -
DNA, - .
, DNA
. O O
30 -
-
. .
O -
(P-gp, MRP) -
. -
. O
- - -
(, -
), - : -
- (), 5-
. (5-Fu) - (Ara-C).
- H MTX -
,
. , -
, .
. - -
- - . O
- (RFC),
. - 113, -
- , -

- - . -
- 26,27,112.
- - , -
. (DHFR). DHFR
- - ,
28. - -

G2/M , DNA113-115.
-
S .
-I
. O .
-, -
, - RFC -
. O - .
- RFC
566 OY

. , -
DHFR S .
- dCK -
2030% -
O 116. 125. -
DHFR, -
- Ara-C.
, -
O
117. -

-
- -
118. -
5- (5-Fu) -
- , P-gp MRP.
, -
. > 50% - .
. T
- ,
- .
(S) 5- -
FdUMP. 5-Fu , - -. -
5-FUTP 5-FdUTP, - - - -
RNA DNA 20 .
DNA. vinca (, ) -
5-Fu - - -
. - -
TS FdUMP
, . O -
-

119. TS -
-, -
dUMP dTMP. -

5-Fu FdUMP
,
, -,
, - .
. -
5-Fu. -
- (P-
TS TS gp, MRP),
120-122. .
Ara-C -
-
. - .
123.
-
Ara-CTP, .
DNA , -
DNA - -
DNA . 126-128.
Ara-C S -
, DNA124. O -
Ara-C -
O-
VII. 567

. O - -DNA
, - . -
DNA (-CG, -G)
. ,
- DNA
ERCC1 ERCC4 -
130-132.
+/+ ATP-, -
MRP 2. - O O-
- OO
-
DNA ,
. -
-S-. . -
, - , -
-S-, ,
129. , -
- 21,133-135. ,

, ,
rNTP, DNA
, (, )
(SV40-Tag,
HPV-E6, Adeno-E1a, ATM ( DNA)
Adeno-E7, HBx)


p53 p53

Pag,
MRP

-
-
p53

(.. RPA, XPB, Topo I, XPD)

MDM2 p21 GADD45 Bax Bcl-2 CD95 TSP

PCNA



DNA


DNA
CDKs
pRb
-pRb/E2F
() E2F
()

4. - p53.
568 OY

, - p53 P-gp137
(. 4). p53 -
G2/M -
G1, , - , -
. , , -
. . -
- p53, -

. , - 138. , -
-
, p53. -
p53 ,
- -.
.
, p53
.
-
p53
. -
- p53 -
- -
- -
G1/S G2/M, - in vitro.
22.
p53
, , , - . O -
, ,
DNA 129, -
136 (. 4). ,
p53 -
, - in vitro
,
p53 50% . .
p53, - -
,
- .
p53 -
- , -
p53 . , ,
p53 ,
MDR 1 - -
. .


1. Bonadonna G, Valagussa P. Dose-response effect of adjuvant vel cDNA restores reduced folate carrier activity and metho-
chemotherapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1981; 304(1): trexate sensitivity to transport deficient cells. J Biol Chem
10-15. 1994; 269(1): 17-20.
2. Savarese DM, Hsieh C, Stewart FM. Clinical impact of che- 4. Gottesman MM, Pastan I. Biochemistry of multidrug resistan-
motherapy dose escalation in patients with hematologic mali- ce mediated by the multidrug transporter. Ann Rev Biochem
gnancies and solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(8): 2981- 1993; 62: 385-427.
2995. 5. Hill BT, Bailey BD, White JC, Goldman ID. Characteristics of
3. Dixon KH, Lanpher BC, Chiu J, Kelley K, Cowan KH. A no- transport of 4-amino antifolates and folate compounds by two
VII. 569

lines of L5178Y lymphoblasts, one with impaired transport of ptosis. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14(4): 2556-2563.
methotrexate. Cancer Res 1979; 39(7 Pt 1): 2440-2446. 24. Flintoff WF, Essani K. Methotrexate-resistant Chinese ham-
6. Sirotnak FM, Moccio DM, Kelleher LE, Goutas LJ. Relative ster ovary cells contain a dihydrofolate reductase with an alter-
frequency and kinetic properties of transport-defective pheno- ed affinity for methotrexate. Biochemistry 1980; 19(18): 4321-
types among methotrexate-resistant L1210 clonal cell lines de- 4327.
rived in vivo. Cancer Res 1981; 41(11 Pt 1): 4447-4452. 25. Hwang J, Hwong CL. Cellular regulation of mammalian DNA
7. Haaz MC, Rivory LP, Riche C, Robert J. The transformation topoisomerases. Adv Pharmacol 1994; 29A: 167-189.
of irinotecan (CPT-11) to its active metabolite SN-38 by hu- 26. Kapoor R, Slade DL, Fujimori A, Pommier Y, Harker WG.
man liver microsomes. Differential hydrolysis for the lactone Altered topoisomerase I expression in two subclones of human
and carboxylate forms. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharma- CEM leukemia selected for resistance to camptothecin. Oncol
col 1997; 356(2): 257-262. Res 1995; 7(2): 83-95.
8. Kanzawa F, Sugimoto Y, Minato K, Kasahara K, Bungo M, 27. Potmesil M, Hsiang YH, Liu LF, Bank B, Grossberg H, Kir-
Nakagawa K, et al. Establishment of a camptothecin analogue schenbaum S, et al. Resistance of human leukemic and normal
(CPT-11)-resistant cell line of human non-small cell lung can- lymphocytes to drug-induced DNA cleavage and low levels of
cer: characterization and mechanism of resistance. Cancer Res DNA topoisomerase II. Cancer Res 1988; 48(12): 3537-3543.
1990; 50(18): 5919-5924. 28. Sullivan DM, Latham MD, Ross WE. Proliferation-dependent
9. Hunt SW, III, Hoffee PA. Amplification of adenosine deami- topoisomerase II content as a determinant of antineoplastic
nase gene sequences in deoxycoformycin-resistant rat hepato- drug action in human, mouse, and Chinese hamster ovary cells.
ma cells. J Biol Chem 1983; 258(21): 13185-13192. Cancer Res 1987; 47(15): 3973-3979.
10. Steuart CD, Burke PJ. Cytidine deaminase and the develop- 29. Beck WT, Danks MK, Wolverton JS, Chen M, Granzen B,
ment of resistance to arabinosyl cytosine. Nat New Biol 1971; Kim R, et al. Resistance of mammalian tumor cells to inhibi-
233(38): 109-110. tors of DNA topoisomerase II. Adv Pharmacol 1994; 29B: 145-
11. Brookes P, Lawley PD. Evidence for the action of alkylating 169.
agents on deoxyribonucleic acid. Exp Cell Res 1963; 24 (Suppl): 30. Ritke MK, Murray NR, Allan WP, Fields AP, Yalowich JC.
9-4. Hypophosphorylation of topoisomerase II in etoposide (VP-
12. Kohn KW, Spears CL, Doty P. Inter-strand crosslinking of 16)-resistant human leukemia K562 cells associated with re-
DNA by nitrogen mustard. J Mol Biol 1966; 19(2): 266-288. duced levels of beta II protein kinase C. Mol Pharmacol 1995;
13. Reed E. Platinum-DNA adduct, nucleotide excision repair and 48(5): 798-805.
platinum based anti-cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 31. Lash LH, Jones DP. Renal glutathione transport. Characteri-
1998; 24(5): 331-344. stics of the sodium-dependent system in the basal-lateral mem-
14. Ewig RA, Kohn KW. DNA damage and repair in mouse leu- brane. J Biol Chem 1984; 259(23): 14508-14514.
kemia L1210 cells treated with nitrogen mustard, 1,3-bis(2- 32. Hinchman CA, Truong AT, Ballatori N. Hepatic uptake of in-
chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea, and other nitrosoureas. Cancer Res tact glutathione S-conjugate, inhibition by organic anions, and
1977; 37(7 Pt 1): 2114-2122. sinusoidal catabolism. Am J Physiol 1993; 265(3 Pt 1): G547-
15. Perez RP. Cellular and molecular determinants of cisplatin re- G554.
sistance. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34(10): 1535-1542. 33. Loe DW, Stewart RK, Massey TE, Deeley RG, Cole SP. ATP-
16. Barry MA, Behnke CA, Eastman A. Activation of programm- dependent transport of aflatoxin B1 and its glutathione conju-
ed cell death (apoptosis) by cisplatin, other anticancer drugs, gates by the product of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP)
toxins and hyperthermia. Biochem Pharmacol 1990; 40(10): gene. Mol Pharmacol 1997; 51(6): 1034-1041.
2353-2362. 34. Gupta V, Jani JP, Jacobs S, Levitt M, Fields L, Awasthi S, et
17. Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T, Housman DE. p53-dependent al. Activity of melphalan in combination with the glutathione
apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell transferase inhibitor sulfasalazine. Cancer Chemother Phar-
1993; 74(6): 957-967. macol 1995; 36(1): 13-19.
18. Reed JC. Bcl-2 family proteins: regulators of apoptosis and 35. Prezioso JA, Fitzgerald GB, Wick MM. Melanoma cytotoxicity
chemoresistance in hematologic malignancies. Semin Hematol of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) alone and in combination with
1997; 34(4 Suppl 5): 9-19. 3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine and melphalan. J Invest Dermatol
19. Schmitt CA, Lowe SW. Apoptosis and therapy. J Pathol 1999; 1992; 99(3): 289-293.
187(1): 127-137. 36. ODwyer PJ, LaCreta F, Nash S, Tinsley PW, Schilder R,
20. Zunino F, Perego P, Pilotti S, Pratesi G, Supino R, Arcamone Clapper ML, et al. Phase I study of thiotepa in combination
F. Role of apoptotic response in cellular resistance to cytotoxic with the glutathione transferase inhibitor ethacrynic acid. Can-
agents. Pharmacol Ther 1997; 76(1-3): 177-185. cer Res 1991; 51(22): 6059-6065.
21. Wyllie AH, Kerr JF, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of 37. Lyttle MH, Hocker MD, Hui HC, Caldwell CG, Aaron DT,
apoptosis. Int Rev Cytol 1980; 68: 251-306. Engqvist-Goldstein A, et al. Isozyme-specific glutathione-S-
22. Lane DP. p53 and human cancers. Br Med Bull 1994; 50(3): transferase inhibitors: design and synthesis. J Med Chem 1994;
582-599. 37(1): 189-194.
23. Chiou SK, Rao L, White E. Bcl-2 blocks p53-dependent apo- 38. Juliano RL, Ling V. A surface glycoprotein modulating drug
570 OY

permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants. Biochem rapamil as a chemosensitizer to reverse drug resistance in pa-
Biophys Acta 1976; 455(1): 152-162. tients with refractory myeloma. A Southwest Oncology Group
39. Sirotnak FM, Moccio DM, Young CW. Increased accumula- study. Cancer 1995; 75(3): 815-820.
tion of methotrexate by murine tumor cells in vitro in the pre- 55. Naito M, Tsuruo T. New multidrug-resistance-reversing drugs,
sence of probenecid which is mediated by a preferential inhibi- MS-209 and SDZ PSC 833. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1997;
tion of efflux. Cancer Res 1981; 41(3): 966-970. 40 Suppl: S20-S24.
40. Aguilar-Bryan L, Nichols CG, Wechsler SW, Clement JP, 56. Shrivastava P, Hanibuchi M, Yano S, Parajuli P, Tsuruo T, So-
Boyd AE, III, Gonzalez G, et al. Cloning of the beta cell high- ne S. Circumvention of multidrug resistance by a quinoline de-
affinity sulfonylurea receptor: a regulator of insulin secretion. rivative, MS-209, in multidrug-resistant human small-cell lung
Science 1995; 268(5209): 423-426. cancer cells and its synergistic interaction with cyclosporin A
41. Papadopoulou B, Roy G, Dey S, Rosen BP, Ouellette M. Con- or verapamil. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 42(6): 483-
tribution of the Leishmania P-glycoprotein-related gene ItpgpA 490.
to oxyanion resistance. J Biol Chem 1994; 269(16): 11980-11986. 57. Smith AJ, Mayer U, Schinkel AH, Borst P. Availability of
42. Ling V. Multidrug resistance: molecular mechanisms and clini- PSC833, a substrate and inhibitor of P-glycoproteins, in va-
cal relevance. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1997; 40 Suppl: rious concentrations of serum. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90(15):
S3-S8. 1161-1166.
43. Chen CJ, Chin JE, Ueda K, Clark DP, Pastan I, Gottesman 58. Wagner RW. The state of the art in antisense research. Nat
MM, et al. Internal duplication and homology with bacterial Med 1995; 1(11): 1116-1118.
transport proteins in the mdr1 (P-glycoprotein) gene from mul- 59. Cucco C, Calabretta B. In vitro and in vivo reversal of multi-
tidrug-resistant human cells. Cell 1986; 47(3): 381-389. drug resistance in a human leukemia-resistant cell line by mdr1
44. Willingham MC, Richert ND, Cornwell MM, Tsuruo T, Ha- antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Cancer Res 1996; 56(19): 4332-
mada H, Gottesman MM, et al. Immunocytochemical localiza- 4337.
tion of P170 at the plasma membrane of multidrug-resistant 60. Hanchett LA, Baker RM, Dolnick BJ. Subclonal heterogeneity
human cells. J Histochem Cytochem 1987; 35(12): 1451-1456. of the multidrug resistance phenotype in a cell line expressing
antisense MDR1 RNA. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1994; 20(6):
45. Cordon-Cardo C, OBrien JP, Boccia J, Casals D, Bertino JR,
463-480.
Melamed MR. Expression of the multidrug resistance gene
product (P-glycoprotein) in human normal and tumor tissues. 61. Ferry DR, Traunecker H, Kerr DJ. Clinical trials of P-glyco-
J Histochem Cytochem 1990; 38(9): 1277-1287. protein reversal in solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A(6):
1070-1081.
46. Cordon-Cardo C, OBrien JP, Casals D, Rittman-Grauer L,
Biedler JL, Melamed MR, et al. Multidrug-resistance gene (P- 62. Chan HS, DeBoer G, Thiessen JJ, Budning A, Kingston JE,
glycoprotein) is expressed by endothelial cells at blood-brain OBrien JM, et al. Combining cyclosporin with chemotherapy
controls intraocular retinoblastoma without requiring radia-
barrier sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86(2): 695-698.
tion. Clin Cancer Res 1996; 2(9): 1499-1508.
47. Fojo AT, Ueda K, Slamon DJ, Poplack DG, Gottesman MM,
63. Coley HM, Verrill MW, Gregson SE, Odell DE, Fisher C, Jud-
Pastan I. Expression of a multidrug-resistance gene in human
son IR. Incidence of P-glycoprotein overexpression and multi-
tumors and tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84(1): 265-
drug resistance (MDR) reversal in adult soft tissue sarcoma.
269.
Eur J Cancer 2000; 36(7): 881-888.
48. Bosch I, Croop J. P-glycoprotein multidrug resistance and can-
64. Coley HM, Sargent JM, Williamson CJ, Titley J, Scheper RJ,
cer. Biochem Biophys Acta 1996; 1288(2): F37-F54.
Gregson SE, et al. Assessment of the classical MDR phenoty-
49. Goldstein LJ, Galski H, Fojo A, Willingham M, Lai SL, Gaz- pe in epithelial ovarian carcinoma using primary cultures: a
dar A, et al. Expression of a multidrug resistance gene in hu- feasibility study. Anticancer Res 2002; 22(1A): 69-74.
man cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81(2): 116-124.
65. Chico I, Kang MH, Bergan R, Abraham J, Bakke S, Meadows
50. Chan HS, Thorner PS, Haddad G, Ling V. Immunohistoche- B, et al. Phase I study of infusional paclitaxel in combination
mical detection of P-glycoprotein: prognostic correlation in soft with the P-glycoprotein antagonist PSC 833. J Clin Oncol
tissue sarcoma of childhood. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8(4): 689-704. 2001; 19(3): 832-842.
51. Chan HS, Haddad G, Thorner PS, DeBoer G, Lin YP, Ondru- 66. Advani R, Saba HI, Tallman MS, Rowe JM, Wiernik PH, Ra-
sek N, et al. P-glycoprotein expression as a predictor of the mek J, et al. Treatment of refractory and relapsed acute mye-
outcome of therapy for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med 1991; logenous leukemia with combination chemotherapy plus the
325(23): 1608-1614. multidrug resistance modulator PSC 833 (Valspodar). Blood
52. Lai SL, Goldstein LJ, Gottesman MM, Pastan I, Tsai CM, 1999; 93(3): 787-795.
Johnson BE, et al. MDR1 gene expression in lung cancer. J 67. Gottesman MM, Fojo T, Bates SE. Multidrug resistance in
Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81(15): 1144-1150. cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer
53. Savaraj N, Wu CJ, Xu R, Lampidis T, Lai S, Donnelly E, et al. 2002; 2(1): 48-58.
Multidrug-resistant gene expression in small-cell lung cancer. 68. Fischer V, Rodriguez-Gascon A, Heitz F, Tynes R, Hauck C,
Am J Clin Oncol 1997; 20(4): 398-403. Cohen D, et al. The multidrug resistance modulator valspodar
54. Dalton WS, Crowley JJ, Salmon SS, Grogan TM, Laufman (PSC 833) is metabolized by human cytochrome P450 3A. Im-
LR, Weiss GR, et al. A phase III randomized study of oral ve- plications for drug-drug interactions and pharmacological acti-
VII. 571

vity of the main metabolite. Drug Metab Dispos 1998; 26(8): 83. Tasaki Y, Nakagawa M, Ogata J, Kiue A, Tanimura H, Ku-
802-811. wano M, et al. Reversal by a dihydropyridine derivative of non-
69. Krishna R, Mayer LD. Multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer. P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance in etoposide-
Mechanisms, reversal using modulators of MDR and the role resistant human prostatic cancer cell line. J Urol 1995; 154(3):
of MDR modulators in influencing the pharmacokinetics of 1210-1216.
anticancer drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000; 11(4): 265-283. 84. Hasegawa S, Abe T, Naito S, Kotoh S, Kumazawa J, Hipfner
70. Mistry P, Stewart AJ, Dangerfield W, Okiji S, Liddle C, Bootle DR, et al. Expression of multidrug resistance-associated pro-
D, et al. In vitro and in vivo reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediat- tein (MRP), MDR1 and DNA topoisomerase II in human
ed multidrug resistance by a novel potent modulator, XR9576. multidrug-resistant bladder cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer 1995;
Cancer Res 2001; 61(2): 749-758. 71(5): 907-913.
71. Dantzig AH, Shepard RL, Cao J, Law KL, Ehlhardt WJ, 85. Slapak CA, Mizunuma N, Kufe DW. Expression of the multi-
Baughman TM, et al. Reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated mul- drug resistance associated protein and P-glycoprotein in doxo-
tidrug resistance by a potent cyclopropyldibenzosuberane mo- rubicin-selected human myeloid leukemia cells. Blood 1994;
dulator, LY335979. Cancer Res 1996; 56(18): 4171-4179. 84(9): 3113-3121.
72. Dantzig AH, Shepard RL, Law KL, Tabas L, Pratt S, Gillespie 86. Kool M, de Haas M, Scheffer GL, Scheper RJ, van Eijk MJ,
JS, et al. Selectivity of the multidrug resistance modulator, Juijn JA, et al. Analysis of expression of cMOAT (MRP2),
LY335979, for P-glycoprotein and effect on cytochrome P-450 MRP3, MRP4, and MRP5, homologues of the multidrug resi-
activities. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999; 290(2): 854-862. stance-associated protein gene (MRP1), in human cancer cell
73. Roe M, Folkes A, Ashworth P, Brumwell J, Chima L, Hunjan lines. Cancer Res 1997; 57(16): 3537-3547.
S, et al. Reversal of P-glycoprotein mediated multidrug resi- 87. Breuninger LM, Paul S, Gaughan K, Miki T, Chan A, Aaron-
stance by novel anthranilamide derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem son SA, et al. Expression of multidrug resistance-associated
Lett 1999; 9(4): 595-600. protein in NIH/3T3 cells confers multidrug resistance associat-
74. Starling JJ, Shepard RL, Cao J, Law KL, Norman BH, Kroin ed with increased drug efflux and altered intracellular drug di-
JS, et al. Pharmacological characterization of LY335979: a po- stribution. Cancer Res 1995; 55(22): 5342-5347.
tent cyclopropyldibenzosuberane modulator of P-glycoprotein. 88. Zaman GJ, Flens MJ, van Leusden MR, de Haas M, Mulder
Adv Enzyme Regul 1997; 37: 335-347. HS, Lankelma J, et al. The human multidrug resistance-asso-
75. van Zuylen L, Nooter K, Sparreboom A, Verweij J. Develop- ciated protein MRP is a plasma membrane drug-efflux pump.
ment of multidrug-resistance convertors: sense or nonsense? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91(19): 8822-8826.
Invest New Drugs 2000; 18(3): 205-220. 89. Evers R, Cnubben NH, Wijnholds J, van Deemter L, van Bla-
76. Newman MJ, Rodarte JC, Benbatoul KD, Romano SJ, Zhang deren PJ, Borst P. Transport of glutathione prostaglandin A
C, Krane S, et al. Discovery and characterization of OC144- conjugates by the multidrug resistance protein 1. FEBS Lett
093, a novel inhibitor of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug 1997; 419(1): 112-116.
resistance. Cancer Res 2000; 60(11): 2964-2972. 90. Zaman GJ, Cnubben NH, van Bladeren PJ, Evers R, Borst P.
77. Abraham J, Edgerly M, Wilson R. A phase I study of the novel Transport of the glutathione conjugate of ethacrynic acid by
P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonist, XR9576 in combination with the human multidrug resistance protein MRP. FEBS Lett 1996;
vinorelbine. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001; 20: 287. 391(1-2): 126-130.
78. Fracasso PM, Westervelt P, Fears CL, Rosen DM, Zuhowski 91. Keppler D, Leier I, Jedlitschky G. Transport of glutathione
EG, Cazenave LA, et al. Phase I study of paclitaxel in combi- conjugates and glucuronides by the multidrug resistance pro-
nation with a multidrug resistance modulator, PSC 833 (Vals- teins MRP1 and MRP2. Biol Chem 1997; 378(8): 787-791.
podar), in refractory malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(5): 92. Kruh GD, Gaughan KT, Godwin A, Chan A. Expression pat-
1124-1134. tern of MRP in human tissues and adult solid tumor cell lines.
79. Cole SP, Bhardwaj G, Gerlach JH, Mackie JE, Grant CE, J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87(16): 1256-1258.
Almquist KC, et al. Overexpression of a transporter gene in a 93. Zaman GJ, Versantvoort CH, Smit JJ, Eijdems EW, de Haas
multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cell line. Science 1992; M, Smith AJ, et al. Analysis of the expression of MRP, the
258(5088): 1650-1654. gene for a new putative transmembrane drug transporter, in
80. Mirski SE, Gerlach JH, Cole SP. Multidrug resistance in a hu- human multidrug resistant lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res
man small cell lung cancer cell line selected in adriamycin. 1993; 53(8): 1747-1750.
Cancer Res 1987; 47(10): 2594-2598. 94. Willman CL. The prognostic significance of the expression and
81. Cole SP, Sparks KE, Fraser K, Loe DW, Grant CE, Wilson function of multidrug resistance transporter proteins in acute
GM, et al. Pharmacological characterization of multidrug resi- myeloid leukemia: studies of the Southwest Oncology Group
stant MRP-transfected human tumor cells. Cancer Res 1994; Leukemia Research Program. Semin Hematol 1997; 34(4 Suppl
54(22): 5902-5910. 5): 25-33.
82. Barrand MA, Heppell-Parton AC, Wright KA, Rabbitts PH, 95. Broxterman HJ, Giaccone G, Lankelma J. Multidrug resistan-
Twentyman PR. A 190-kilodalton protein overexpressed in ce proteins and other drug transport-related resistance to na-
non-P-glycoprotein-containing multidrug-resistant cells and its tural product agents. Curr Opin Oncol 1995; 7(6): 532-540.
relationship to the MRP gene. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86(2): 96. Berger W, Hauptmann E, Elbling L, Vetterlein M, Kokoschka
110-117. EM, Micksche M. Possible role of the multidrug resistance-as-
572 OY

sociated protein (MRP) in chemoresistance of human melano- 1991; 266(11): 6659-6662.


ma cells. Int J Cancer 1997; 71(1): 108-115. 112. Kaufmann SH, McLaughlin SJ, Kastan MB, Liu LF, Karp JE,
97. Norris MD, Bordow SB, Marshall GM, Haber PS, Cohn SL, Burke PJ. Topoisomerase II levels during granulocytic matu-
Haber M. Expression of the gene for multidrug-resistance-as- ration in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 1991; 51(13): 3534-3543.
sociated protein and outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. 113. Henderson GB, Tsuji JM, Kumar HP. Transport of folate
N Engl J Med 1996; 334(4): 231-238. compounds by leukemic cells. Evidence for a single influx car-
98. Zhou DC, Zittoun R, Marie JP. Expression of multidrug resi- rier for methotrexate, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, and folate in
stance-associated protein (MRP) and multidrug resistance CCRF-CEM human lymphoblasts. Biochem Pharmacol 1987;
(MDR1) genes in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 1995; 9 36(18): 3007-3014.
(10): 1661-1666. 114. Moscow JA, Gong M, He R, Sgagias MK, Dixon KH, Anzick
99. Elliott T. How does TAP associate with MHC class I molecu- SL, et al. Isolation of a gene encoding a human reduced folate
les? Immunol Today 1997; 18(8): 375-379. carrier (RFC1) and analysis of its expression in transport-de-
100. Neefjes JJ, Momburg F, Hammerling GJ. Selective and ATP- ficient, methotrexate-resistant human breast cancer cells. Can-
dependent translocation of peptides by the MHC-encoded cer Res 1995; 55(17): 3790-3794.
transporter. Science 1993; 261(5122): 769-771. 115. Wong SC, Proefke SA, Bhushan A, Matherly LH. Isolation of
101. Izquierdo MA, Neefjes JJ, Mathari AE, Flens MJ, Scheffer human cDNAs that restore methotrexate sensitivity and re-
GL, Scheper RJ. Overexpression of the ABC transporter TAP duced folate carrier activity in methotrexate transport-defecti-
in multidrug-resistant human cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer ve Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem 1995; 270(29):
1996; 74(12): 1961-1967. 17468-17475.
116. Matherly LH, Taub JW, Ravindranath Y, Proefke SA, Wong
102. Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine AJ, How-
SC, Gimotty P, et al. Elevated dihydrofolate reductase and
ley PM. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavi-
impaired methotrexate transport as elements in methotrexate
rus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell
resistance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
1990; 63(6): 1129-1136.
1995; 85(2): 500-509.
103. Scheper RJ, Broxterman HJ, Scheffer GL, Kaaijk P, Dalton
117. Schweitzer BI, Dicker AP, Bertino JR. Dihydrofolate redu-
WS, van Heijningen TH, et al. Overexpression of a M(r) 110,000
ctase as a therapeutic target. FASEB J 1990; 4(8): 2441-2452.
vesicular protein in non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug
118. Rhee MS, Wang Y, Nair MG, Galivan J. Acquisition of resi-
resistance. Cancer Res 1993; 53(7): 1475-1479.
stance to antifolates caused by enhanced gamma-glutamyl hy-
104. Chugani DC, Kedersha NL, Rome LH. Vault immunofluore-
drolase activity. Cancer Res 1993; 53(10 Suppl): 2227-2230.
scence in the brain: new insights regarding the origin of mi-
119. Peters GJ, van der Wilt CL, van Groeningen CJ, Smid K,
croglia. J Neurosci 1991; 11(1):256-268.
Meijer S, Pinedo HM. Thymidylate synthase inhibition after
105. Chugani DC, Rome LH, Kedersha NL. Evidence that vault ri- administration of fluorouracil with or without leucovorin in
bonucleoprotein particles localize to the nuclear pore com- colon cancer patients: implications for treatment with fluo-
plex. J Cell Sci 1993; 106 (Pt 1):23-29. rouracil. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(10): 2035-2042.
106. Izquierdo MA, Scheffer GL, Flens MJ, Giaccone G, Broxter- 120. van der Wilt CL, Pinedo HM, de Jong M, Peters GJ. Effect of
man HJ, Meijer CJ, et al. Broad distribution of the multidrug folate diastereoisomers on the binding of 5-fluoro-2-deoxyu-
resistance-related vault lung resistance protein in normal hu- ridine-5-monophosphate to thymidylate synthase. Biochem
man tissues and tumors. Am J Pathol 1996; 148(3): 877-887. Pharmacol 1993; 45(5): 1177-1179.
107. Izquierdo MA, Shoemaker RH, Flens MJ, Scheffer GL, Wu 121. Bapat AR, Zarow C, Danenberg PV. Human leukemic cells
L, Prather TR, et al. Overlapping phenotypes of multidrug re- resistant to 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine contain a thymidylate syn-
sistance among panels of human cancer-cell lines. Int J Can- thetase with lower affinity for nucleotides. J Biol Chem 1983;
cer 1996; 65(2): 230-237. 258(7): 4130-4136.
108. Izquierdo MA, van der Zee AG, Vermorken JB, van der Valk 122. Jenh CH, Geyer PK, Baskin F, Johnson LF. Thymidylate syn-
P, Belien JA, Giaccone G, et al. Drug resistance-associated thase gene amplification in fluorodeoxyuridine-resistant mou-
marker Lrp for prediction of response to chemotherapy and se cell lines. Mol Pharmacol 1985; 28(1): 80-85.
prognoses in advanced ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 123. Capizzi RL, Yang JL, Rathmell JP, White JC, Cheng E,
1995; 87(16): 1230-1237. Cheng YC, et al. Dose-related pharmacologic effects of high-
109. den Boer ML, Pieters R, Kazemier KM, Rottier MM, Zwaan dose ara-C and its self-potentiation. Semin Oncol 1985; 12(2
CM, Kaspers GJ, et al. Relationship between major vault pro- Suppl 3): 65-74.
tein/lung resistance protein, multidrug resistance-associated 124. Drenthe-Schonk AM, Holdrinet RS, van Egmond J, Wessels
protein, P-glycoprotein expression, and drug resistance in child- JM, Haanen C. Cytokinetic changes after cytosine arabinosi-
hood leukemia. Blood 1998; 91(6): 2092-2098. de in acute non-lymphocyte leukemia. Leuk Res 1981; 5(1):
110. Dingemans AM, Ark-Otte J, van der Valk P, Apolinario RM, 89-96.
Scheper RJ, Postmus PE, et al. Expression of the human ma- 125. Flasshove M, Strumberg D, Ayscue L, Mitchell BS, Tirier C,
jor vault protein LRP in human lung cancer samples and nor- Heit W, et al. Structural analysis of the deoxycytidine kinase
mal lung tissues. Ann Oncol 1996; 7(6): 625-630. gene in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and resistance
111. Wang JC. DNA topoisomerases: why so many? J Biol Chem to cytosine arabinoside. Leukemia 1994; 8(5):780-785.
VII. 573

126. Horwitz SB, Cohen D, Rao S, Ringel I, Shen HJ, Yang CP. drug resistance in ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1995;
Taxol: mechanisms of action and resistance. J Natl Cancer 58(2): 165-178.
Inst Monogr 1993;(15): 55-61. 133. Dive C, Hickman JA. Drug-target interactions: only the first
127. Kavallaris M, Kuo DY, Burkhart CA, Regl DL, Norris MD, step in the commitment to a programmed cell death? Br J
Haber M, et al. Taxol-resistant epithelial ovarian tumors are Cancer 1991; 64(1): 192-196.
associated with altered expression of specific beta-tubulin iso- 134. Fisher DE. Apoptosis in cancer therapy: crossing the thres-
types. J Clin Invest 1997; 100(5): 1282-1293. hold. Cell 1994; 78(4): 539-542.
128. Cabral F, Barlow SB. Mechanisms by which mammalian cells 135. Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological
acquire resistance to drugs that affect microtubule assembly. phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kine-
FASEB J 1989; 3(5): 1593-1599. tics. Br J Cancer 1972; 26(4): 239-257.
129. Meijer C, de Vries EG, Dam WA, Wilkinson MH, Hollema 136. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC. Muta-
H, Hoekstra HJ, et al. Immunocytochemical analysis of cisp- tions in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiolo-
latin-induced platinum-DNA adducts with double-fluorescen- gy and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 1994; 54(18): 4855-
ce video microscopy. Br J Cancer 1997; 76(3): 290-298. 4878.
130. Crul M, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH, Maliepaard M. Cisplatin 137. Eliopoulos AG, Kerr DJ, Herod J, Hodgkins L, Krajewski S,
resistance and DNA repair. Cancer Treat Rev 1997; 23(5-6): Reed JC, et al. The control of apoptosis and drug resistance
341-366. in ovarian cancer: influence of p53 and Bcl-2. Oncogene 1995;
131. Ferry KV, Hamilton TC, Johnson SW. Increased nucleotide 11(7): 1217-1228.
excision repair in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells: role 138. Chin KV, Ueda K, Pastan I, Gottesman MM. Modulation of
of ERCC1-XPF. Biochem Pharmacol 2000; 60(9): 1305-1313. activity of the promoter of the human MDR1 gene by Ras
132. van der Zee AG, Hollema HH, de Bruijn HW, Willemse PH, and p53. Science 1992; 255(5043): 459-462.
Boonstra H, Mulder NH, et al. Cell biological markers of


. . , .

O . -
, -
, .

I I OOO I
O.
OOTHTA

-
. . -

, . -

. -
- (. 1):
1980, . -
.
, , -
(threshold)



.
, -
-
-
-

.
.


-
:
.
1. ( )

.
2. ()

, -
. mg/m2 /.
3. -


()
.
4. (
)

(IV, p.o., V ,
..). 1. . : -
, : , :
O - , : .

575
576 OY

- -
( ( , ,
, , ). ).
,
: ,
1. - ,
, . -
. -
- -
- ,
- , -
. -
. , ,
2. .
, -- O -
, Coldman Gol-
. - die1
. -
. -
3. , - -
, .
:
. 1.
.
- 2. -
. .
, 3.
, .
- 4. -
, .
, (. 2). O
.
- -
, - -


100
2. -

75
(
(%)

) in vitro -
()
50
() . -


25
,
v

v ,
10 .

.
1

VII. 577

. - in vitro in i -
, - . -
, ,
. - 1960 1970 -
- , -
(.. - .
, ..). - ( ) ,
, -
, Skipper, Schabel, Griswold ..
, - -
.
, , -
, - -
, -
, ,
. -

, -
- . -
x ,
. ,

- ,
- -
: . x -
1. O - 2, -
- ,
. 1,
2. .
-
- :
, - 1.
- ,
. , -
, - -
, -
.

1.

,
-
.
1.
3. 2.
3.
- 4. (2 3)
. 5. (1 3)*
6. (1 3 / 2 3)
O
* -
- ,
-
-

-
578 OY

. O von Hoff et al4


2. - ,

, -
. .
3. - ,
- . -
,
- -
. 14 ,
- -
. O
-
.
, - . -
- -
. .

, -
.


. -

, -
-
, -
, - .
G0 -
. -
- . -
3,
P-
(.. 20%) - -
(.. 50%) - -
. -
. in vitro -
-
-
. .
-
, - ,
. . -
- oshida (-
, , -S--
, )
- , -
. - , -
-
. - .

( P-
- ) . O -
, - 5,6
3. -
VII. 579

, ). -
- -
. .

-
. - ,
- - -
- .
. -
. -
-
. O Behrens et al7 - 6070 mg/m2 3 . -

. 5060%. -
. -
. 3040 mg/m2 3 -

30% .
810 -
. - , > 120 mg/m2 34 -
.
. 85%9.
- -
8 : . O Bronchud et al10
1. 125
mg/m2 2 rG-CSF. -
- -
. (4 4 15
2. - ), . -
- Ferguson et al11
. 100 mg/m2 2 ( -
3. - ) rG-CSF.
, - (89% 33% -
- ),
. .
4. , - -
, . -
, . -
. Foungilas et al12
O O I 110 mg/m2
O 2 rG-CSF
- > 90%
- .
, (64% 14% )
- -
. - . O -
-
-
, .
, , -
(.. , .
580 OY

- -
- , AUC, -
. - -
, , -
, (. 3). -
, AUC 57 mg/ml min
- 450
. 600 mg/m2.
AUC > 57 mg/ml min,
.
. - -

. - , ,
mg/m2, . O
.
: -
. -
- 100 mg/m2
. 300 mg/m2 6 , -
(area under the curve AUC) - 1,82 14,
15. II
. AUC ,
, - ,
- .
( -
) . - O O
O

( AUC = - , -
/ GFR + 25),
mg/m2. -
O Jordrell et al13
Bristol-Squibb Co - . , , -
. -
-
-
.
100 16,
(%)

17,18.
80
,
60 ,
(
40
) -
20
.
23 45 67 89 1011 1213 1415
AUC (mg/ml min) O O

3.
(AUC)
.
VII. 581

. ) -
, .. -
, , - .
. -
( , -
) . O Bonadona
Valagussa19 .
2. -
(CMF). -

- .
- O -
( ) -
. 5 - .
77%, 56% 48%
, O
> 85%, 6585% < 65% . - O
20 O , Hryniuk
- ,
, - -
. - 30,31.
- O -
OPP Hodgkin21, - ,
CHOP22 LNH-8423 - : ) -
dgkis .. ,

) -
. - . -
, ()
.
O - mg/m2 /-
.
-
( -
) , -
- ( 2).
.

O Hodgkin24,25,26,27 .
- -
28,29. ,
. . :
O - 1. -
-
mg/m2 /,
.
. 2.
- -
: ,
1. .
( - 3.
582 OY

2.

1. : 60 mg/m2 3 20 mg/m2 /.
2. : 100 mg/m2 2 50 mg/m2 /. 50/20 = 2,5

3. -

1. :
600 mg/m2, . 1 200 mg/m2 /.
45 mg/m2, . 2 15 mg/m2 /.
45 mg/m2, . 1 8 300 mg/m2 /.
2. :
1.200 mg/m2, . 1 400 mg/m2 /. 400/200 = 2
45 mg/m2, . 1 8 30 mg/m2 /. 30/15 = 2
3 450 mg/m2, . 1 8 300 mg/m2 /. 300/300 = 1

() : (2 + 2 + 1) / 3 = 1,66

, ,


. O - (. 4). , -
(
3). 33 50
- . -
- -
, , - CHAP (, -
. - , )32 -
.
.
- 33,34. -
, 78
0 -
35.
-
. CMF, -
CAF, (
, - ) -
- 36, -
1, CMF
. I37,
Hryniuk, -
- 30.
, - -
,
, ,
VII. 583

A B
100
(%)
80

60

40

20

0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2

4. ()
() ,
Hryniuk.

.
( )
30,31.
-
. Klasa et al38 - .
-
- -
39.
,
. -
- 22 Hodgkins -
. 40. -
-
- 0,
- , -
- , -
1 . -
, ( -
-
. -
- ),
. , - .
O ,
. -
. -
34. -
CHAP -
, - .
. :
1.
16 mg/m2 /. ,
- -
- . -
584 OY

-
- , -
- .
, - 3. -
, -
. -
2. ( )

. .
- 4. O

. - , -
- .
5.
. , .

. . ,
3. ,
,

Hodgkins - . -

. ,
, , -
OO OO
.
( - O -
, ) -
-
. - , -
, .
-
- O (O)
.
-
O. O
. O , -
. -
. 45 mg/m2
1. O - 3 .
- . -
. - -
- , 30 mg/m2 3 .
- 45 mg/m2 3 . -
(72% vs 59%)
Hryniuk (1987) - ,
, 41.
- -
-
. . -
2. - -
. - -
VII. 585

4. - (Ara-C)

A
Ara-C (mg/m2) DNR* (mg/m2) (%)

Preisler et al43 427 100 7 . vs 45 3 . 53


100 10 . 45 3 . 57
Dillman et al44 326 100 7 . vs 45 3 . 58
200 7 . 45 3 . 58
Schiller et al45 101 200 7 . vs 60 3 . 71
1.000 6 . 60 3 . 74
Weick et al46 200 7 .** vs 45 3 . 55
4.000 6 .** 45 3 . 59

* DNR: , ** < 45

5. O - (Ara-C)*

Ara-C (mg/m2) ** (%)*** (%)***

100 5 . vs 21 31
400 5 . vs 25 35
3.000 2 1, 3 5 . 39 46

* 596 , ** < 60 , *** 2

-
42. . -
- -
12 g/m2 - - -
7 . . -
- -
596 , -
( 36 g/m2) . O - 41. -
- 5,
- - . -
- - -
(. 4) - ,
. , - . -
700 mg/m2 7 18 g/m2 6 ( -
, - ) ,
. - < 60 . -
-
46. - -
, - O.
-
- dgkins ()
O. -
O,
-
586 OY

6. -
Hodgkins

Carde et al48 141 CHVmp vs


CHVmp+VB (80% vs 50%) -
5
Longo et al49 193 Pro-MACE-MOPP vs
Pro-MACE-Cyta ,
BOM
Montserrat et al50 134 CHOP vs
Pro-MACE-Cyta
BOM
Cooper et al51 CHOP vs
MACOP-B
Gordon et al52 325 CHOP vs
m-BACOD
Fisher et al53 899 CHOP vs ,
m-BACOD vs
Pro-MACE-Cyta
BOM vs MACOP-B
Sertoli et al54 221 Pro-MACE-MOPP -
, 3

. , - -
1970 1980, ,
(CHOP, BACOD, COMLA),
(m-BACOD, COP-BLAM, Pro-MACE- CHOP.
MOPP) (pro-MACE-Cyta BOM, MA- , -
COP-B, COP-BLAM ). ,
- -
- . -
. - , ,
-
. -
Hryniuk 39,40.
- ( -
, -
- ), -
39,40.
O -

- .
. 7
(. 6), 2
, 5 - O -
- -
, , -
. -

VII. 587

7. . -

Samson et al55 114 ( - 15 mg/m2 5 . vs VBL, Bleo


) 120 mg/m2 VBL, Bleo (63% vs 43%)
Ozols et al56 52 ( ) 20 mg/m2 5 . vs VBL, Bleo
40 mg/m2 5 . VBL, Bleo
VP 16 (88% vs 67%),

Nichols et al57 153 ( ) 100 mg/m2 vs VP 16
200 mg/m2 VP 16 (73% vs 68%),

VBL: , Bleo: , VP 16:

. - -
, - , .
, 3
(. 7), -
- 100%
. 55,56 -
- .
- -
. , - -
( - -
) . .
85
.
O -
,
. - -
,
120 mg/m2 ( (. 8). 58 -
, 100 mg/m2) -
75 mg/m2 ( 25% , -
). 56 - , .
- , ,
- .
, . Mc Guire et al59, -
- ,
. -
-
, ( ), -

. .
57 - , ,
. - . -
( ) 60 -
. ,
-
588 OY

8.

Ngan et al58 50 ( CP 60 mg/m2** vs -


) CP 120 mg/m2 (60% vs 30% 3 )
Kay et al60 190 ( CP 50 mg/m2*** ( 6) vs
) CP 100 mg/m2 ( 6)
Mc Guire et al59 485 ( CP 50 mg/m2
) C 500 mg/m2 ( 6) vs
CP 100 mg/m2
C 1.000 mg/m2 ( 4)
Bolis et al61 372 CP 75 mg/m2*** . ( 6) -
vs CP 50 mg/m2 . ( 9) > 2 cm (25% vs 22%).
(39,5% vs 59%)
< 2 cm -

Colombo et al62 306 CP 75 mg/m2 3 . ( 6)
vs CP 50 mg/m2 . ( 9)

CP: , C: , * , 3 , ** C 600 mg/m2


, *** C 750 mg/m2

. -
.
. -
-
. -
- > 2 cm
. . -

Mc Guire et al. -
. O Bolis et a161 .
-
(2,5
) -
,
2 cm, 63,64 -
- , -
2 cm. ,
(. 9).
. , .
, 6 -
. - -
(
, - )
. - (. 10). 65 -
-
62, . FAC (, , -
- ) -
. , .
-
VII. 589

9.

Garmo-Pereira et al63 48 D 35 mg/m2 3 . ( 6)


D 70 mg/m2 3 . ( 8) (24% vs 58%)

Tannock et al64 133 C 30 mg/m2
M 20 mg/m2 (11 vs 30%)
F 300 mg/m2 vs
CMF

D: , C: , M: , F:

10. -

Hortobagyi et al65 59 F 500 mg/m2


D 50 mg/m2
C 500 mg/m2 vs
F 2.500 mg/m2
D 100 mg/m2
C 1.800 mg/m2
Ebbs et al66 62 D 20 mg/m2 /.
D 40 mg/m2 /.
Habeshaw et al67 209 E 50 mg/m2 2 . ( 16)
vs E 100 mg/m2 3 . ( 8) (41% vs 21%), -


Focan et al168 141 E 50 mg/m2 . 1* vs
E 50 mg/m2 . 1 8 ( 3 .) (69% vs 41%)
,
The French Epirubicin 412 E 50 mg/m2 . vs
Study Group69 E 50 mg/m2** vs .
E 75 mg/m2**


Basthold et al70 261 40 mg/m2 vs
E 60 mg/m2 vs (21% vs
E 90 mg/m2 vs 25,5% vs 47,2% vs 35,4%) 90 mg/m2
E 135 mg/m2

F: , D: , C: , :
* C 500 mg/m2 F 500 mg/m2. 3 , **
F 500 mg/m2 C 500 mg/m2 . 3

- -
-
. - .
66 -
. - . -
67,68
590 OY

,
- .
.
. -
69
.
- ,
70 - ,
50 mg/m2 135 mg/m2 3 - , -
. - . O ,
( 40 mg/m2 90 mg/m2) ,
, - . -
.
71 (CALGB)
- II -
. , -
- . -
- CAF (. 11).
- -
CMF -
, . -
, - ( 50%) -
. -
, .
, ( 72, , -
- -
), -
. , -
, -
.
, - , -
, , - -
- -

11.

Wood et al71 1.562 C 200 mg/m2, . 1 -


D 20 mg/m2, . 1 ( -
F 200 mg/m2, . 1 8 4 . ( 6) 3 ).
vs
4 . ( 6) vs
C 600 mg/m2, . 1
D 60 mg/m2, . 1
F 600 mg/m2, . 1 8 4 . ( 4)
Dimitrof et al72 2.238 C 600 mg/m2 ( 4) vs
C 1.200 mg/m2 ( 2) vs C
C 1.200 mg/m2 ( 4)
( D 60 mg/m2.
3 )

C: , D: , F:
VII. 591

, -
, . 74
. , ,
,
.
-
, CAV (, -
, ) (. 13). 75
. - , -
, -
. - , .
76
(. 12). 73 - -
.
.
-
, , (.
. 14). O Wolff et al77 -
- -

12. -
.

Cohen et al73 32 CCNU 50 mg/m2 M


M 10 mg/m2
C 500 mg/m2 vs
CCNU 100 mg/m2*
M 12 mg/m2
C 1.000 mg/m2
ODonnel et al74 26 C 750 mg/m2** -
mCCNU 75 mg/m2 vs (57% vs 21%),
C 2.000 mg/m2
mCCNU 100 mg/m2

CCNU: , : , C: , mCCNU:
* 2 , ** 2 mg

13.
. CAV

Figuereto et al75 103 D 50 mg/m2


C 1.000 mg/m2 vs
D 60 mg/m2
C 1.5002.000 mg/m2
Johnson et al76 298 ( ) D 40 mg/m2 vs
C 120 mg**
D 70 mg

D: , C: , V:
* 3 , ** 3 6
592 OY

14. /

Wolf et al77 79 ( ) VP 16 100 mg/m2 3 vs


VP 16 200 mg/m2 3 vs
VP 16 300 mg/m2 3
Arriagada et al79 105 ( ) CP 80 mg/m2, . 1
C 225 mg/m2 4 . vs (67% vs 54%),
CP 100 mg/m2, . 1**
C 300 mg/m2 4 .
Ihde et al78 90 ( ) CP 80 mg/m2, . 1
VP 16 80 mg/m2, . 13 vs
CP 27 mg/m2, . 15**
VP 16 80 mg/m2, . 15

VP 16: , CP:
* 3 , ** 6 .
40 mg/m2 3 VP 16 75 mg/m2 3, *** H 2 4 -

,
. Ihde .
et al78 - 2. , -
,
. , . -
-
- .
. -
46% .
. - 3. O -
- . -
. -
( 2535%) -
6 - ,

- . -
.
- ,
. - -
,
-
. . -
, -
OH OI OA ,
OOE .
-
: OO O
1. - O
. , -
-
,
VII. 593

, . -
30. - -

- . -
. - 86.
. - . O Twelves et al87 -

- -
- . 88
, - FEC
. - (, , ) -
, - 4 25% -
. 24- . -
-
, -
( ). -
- .

-
80. -
- 34
. - . -
, , . -
.
. -
- x (403 -
, , ) 89. -
24 -
81. II - , , 3 -
p.o. .
( 21 ) 4
8 CMF. -
- 4 2 CMF -
82,83. 84 . -
. -
p.o. 21 -
, , - ( 10 )
3 4 -
V. .
-
35 .
IV.
- -
90,91.
- -
. - , -
-
, .
. - . -
85 - -

594 OY

( NTATIKOOIHH TH XHMEIOEPAEIA ME
)90. - THN YOTHPIH AIMOOIHTIKN AYHTIKN
, , - APAONTN (AA)
92. -
93,94 .
-
-
(-
34 ) . -
- . -
.
-
. 20% 100% 9,10,11,12.

O -
OO O . O ,
E OOOI OTEEMATO -
IOOIKOY APAONTE TOY OKOY . , -


, -

,
. ,

-
97.
-
(-
-.
), -
95 -
. -
,
-
-
, , (
. (3 gr/m2 3 .) ) -
(400 mg/m2 5 .) - -
- 98. -
, , -
- .
. -
, -
-
( CAF), .
-
, c-erbB296. EAEPAEIA ME AYTOOH METAMOXEYH
( 50%) c- MYEOY TN OTN YOTHPIH ME POO-
erbB2 NIKA KYTTAPA EPIEPIKOY AIMATO
.
(<50%) -
- 45 -
. . -
O .
, -
- . , -
, ,
- , -
.
VII. 595

. - 4 108.
. -

.
, - .
,
:
. , -
, , -HCG
, > 1.000 U/l 103.
, -
, -
- Hodgkin109,110, 2 -
. -
, Hodgkin99, Hodgkins 111.
100, 101, ,
-
102. , - . -
, - , ,
- , ECOG PS, LDH -
, -
. - 111.
-
. - I
- -
.
- . O -
- ,
, . -
. - , in vitro -
- , -
-
, , -
103. , -
, .
2

(82% -
71%, p = 0,0184) 104. - . -
- -
105. (20100%) .

. -
- -
.
5 - , -
, -
25%106,107. , - .
, -
3 - -
VIP / VeIP - .
596 OY

1. Coldman AJ, Goldie JH. Impact of dose-intensive chemothe- 16. Barker G, Wiltshaw . Use of high-dose cisdichloro-diamine
rapy n the development of permanent drug resistance. Semin platinum (II) (NSC-119875) following failure on previous che-
Oncol 1987; 14 (Suppl 4): 29-33. motherapy for advanced carcinoma of the ovary. Br J Obstet
2. Skipper . Dose-intensity versus total dose of chemotherapy. Gynecol 1981; 88: 1192-9.
n experimental basis. Important Adv Oncol 1990: 43-64. 17. Markman , Rothman R, Hakes , et al. Second line plati-
3. Bruce WR, Meeker BE, Valeriote FA. Comparison of the sen- num therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated
sitivity of normal hemopoietic and transplanted lymphoma co- with cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 389-93.
lony-forming cells to chemotherapeutic agents administered in 18. Ozols R, Corden , Jacob J, et al. High-dose cisplatinum in hy-
vivo. J Natl Can Inst 1996; 37: 233-45. pertonic saline. Ann Intern Med 1984; 100: 19-24.
4. Von Hoff DD, Clark GM, Weiss GR, et al. Use of in vitro 19. Bonadona G, Valagussa . Dose-response effect of adjuvant
dose response effects to select antineoplastics for high-dose or chemotherapy in breast cancer. Engl J Med 1981; 304: 1015.
regional administration regimens. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1827- 20. Ang , Buzdar AU, Smith TL, et al. Analysis of dose-intensi-
34. ty in doxorubicin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II
5. McGown , Ward , Fox BW. Comparative study of the and III breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1677-84.
uptake of daunorubicin in sensitive and resistant 388 cell li- 21. Green , Dawson , Fell LF, et al. Measurement of drug
nes by flow cytometry and brochemical extraction procedures. dosage intensity in therapy in Hodgkins disease. Brit J
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1983; 11: 113-6. Clin Pharmacol 1980; 9: 511-14.
6. McGown , Fox BW. proposed mechanism of resistance 22. Epelbaum R, Haim , Blen SM, et al. Dose-intensity analysis
t cyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard in a oshi- for CHOP chemotherapy in diffuse aggresive large cell lym-
da cell line in vitro. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1986; 17: phoma. Isr J Med Scie 1988; 24: 533-8.
223-6. 23. Coffier , Gisselbrecht C, Herbrecht R, et al. LNH-84 regi-
7. Behrens BG, Hamilton TC, Masuda , et al. Characterization men. multicenter study of intensive chemotherapy in 757 pa-
of a cisdiamine dichloro-platinum () resistant human ovarian tients with aggressive malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1989;
cancer cell line and its use in evaluation of platinum analo- 7: 1018-26.
gues. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 414-8. 24. Carde , Mackintosh FR, Rosenberg SA. dose and time res-
8. Gurney , Dodwell D, Thatcher , Tattersal . Escalat- ponse analysis of the treatment of Hodgkins disease with O
ing drug delivery in cancer chemotherapy. review of consepts chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1983; 1: 146-53.
and practice, Part 1. nn Oncol 1993; 4: 23-34. 25. Van Rijswijk RE, Haanen C, Dekker AW, et al. Dose-intensity
9. Jones RB, Holland JF, Bhardwaj S, et al. phase I- study of of O chemotherapy and survival in Hodgkins disease. J
intensive-dose adriamycin for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1776-82.
Oncol 1987; 5: 172-177. 26. Longo DL, Young RC, Duffey PL, et al. O after two de-
10. Bronchud , Howell , Crowther D, et al. The use of granu- cates (letter). J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 320-1.
locyte colony-stimulating factor t increase the intensity of 27. Pillai GM, Hagemeister FB, Valasquez WS, et al. Prognostic
treatment with advanced breast and ovarian cancer. Br J Can- factors for stage IV Hodgkins disease treated with O, with
cer 1989; 60: 121-25. or without bleomycin. Cancer 1985; 55: 691-7.
11. Ferguson JE, Dodwell DJ, Seymour -, et al. High-dose, 28. Hoskins J, Ng V, Spinelli JJ, et al. Prognostic variables in pa-
dose-intensive chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophos- tients with diffuse large cell lymphoma treated with MACOP-B.
phamide for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Br J J Clin Oncol 199l; 9: 220-6.
Cancer 1993; 67: 825-9. 29. Kwak LW, Holpern J, Olshen RA, et al. Prognostic significan-
12. Fountzilas G, Scarlos D, Giannakakis , et al. Intensive che- ce of actual dose-intensity in diffuse large-cell lyphoma. Re-
motherapy with high-dose epirubicin every two weeks and pro- sults of a three-structured survival analysis. J Clin Oncol 1990;
phylactic administration of filgastim in advanced breast cancer. 8: 963-77.
Eur J Cancer 1994; 30: 965-9. 30. Hryniuk W. Average relative dose-intensity and the impact on
13. Jordrell DI, Egorin MJ, Canetta RM, et al. Relationship bet- design of clinical trials. Sem Oncol 1987; 14: 65-74.
ween carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in 31. Hryniuk W, Figueredo , Goodyear . Applications of dose-
patients with ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 520-28. intensity to problems of chemotherapy of breast and colorectal
14. Lund , Hansen , Hansen O, et al. High-dose platinum cancer. Sem Oncol 1987; 14 (Suppl 4): 3-11.
consisting of combined carboplatin and cisplatin in previously 32. Greco FA, Julian CG, Richardson RL. Advanced ovarian can-
untreated ovarian cancer patients with residual disease. J Clin cer. Brief intensive combination chemotherapy in second book
Oncol 1989; 7: 1469-73. operation. Obstet Gynecol 1981: 202-205.
15. Piccart MJ, Nogaret JM, Marcelis L, et al. Cisplatin combinent 33. Levin L, Hryniuk W. Dose-intensity analysis of chemotherapy
with carboplatin: a new way n intensification of platinum do- regimens in varian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 756-67.
se in the treatment of advansed ovarian cancer. Belgian study 34. Levin L, Hryniuk W. The application of dose-intensity to pro-
group for ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 703- 7. blems in chemotherapy of ovarian and endometrial cancer.
VII. 597

Sem Oncol 1987; 14 (suppl 4): 12-19. mas. randomized trial. Blood 1991; 78 (Suppl 1): 127a.
35. Levin L, Simon R, Hryniuk W. Importance of multiagent che- 51. Cooper , Ding JC, Matthews JP, et al. randomized com-
motherapy regimens in ovarian carcinoma. Dose-intensity ana- parison of MACOP-B and CHOP in intermediate grade non-
lysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 83: 1732-42. Hodgkins lymphoma. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 1991; 10: 271.
36. Hryniuk W, Bush . The importance of dose-intensity in che- 52. Gordon LI, Harrington D, Andersen J, et al. Comparison of a
motherapy of metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: second-generation combination chemotherapy regimen (m-
1281-8. BACOD) with a standard regimen (CHOP) for advanced dif-
37. Hryniuk W, Levine . Analysis of dose-intensity for adju- fuse non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Engl J Med 1992; 327: l342-
vant chemotherapy trials in stage II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 39.
1986; 4: 1162-70. 53. Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, et al. Comparison of a
38. Klasa R, Murray , Coldman . Dose-intensity meta-analysis standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy
of chemotherapy in small cell carcinoma of the lung. Proc Am regimens for advanced non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Engl J
Soc Clin Oncol 1988; 7: 202. Med 1993; 328: 1002-6.
39. De Vita VT Jr, Hubbard SM, Longo DL. The chemotherapy 54. Sertoli MR, Santini G, Chiseni I, et al. COP-B versus pro-
of lymphomas. Looking back, moving forward. Cancer Res MACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-
1987; 47: 5810-24. Hodgkins lymphoma. Results of a prospective randomized
40. Mayer RM, Hryniuk WM, Goodyear MD. The role of dose-in- trial by the non-Hodgkins lymphoma cooperative study group.
tensity in determining outcome in intermediate-grade non- J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1366-74.
Hodgkins lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 339-47. 55. Samson , Rivkin SE, Jones SE, et al. Dose-response and
41. ates JW, Wallace HJ, Ellison RR, et al. Cytosine-arabinoside dose-survival advantage for high- versus low-dose cisplatin com-
(NSC-3878) and daunorubicin (NSC-83142) therapy in acute bined with vinblastine and bleomycin in disseminated testicu-
non-lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Rep 1973; 7: lar cancer. Cancer 1984; 53: 1029-35.
485-88. 56. Ozols RF, Ihde DC, Linehan WM, et al. randomized trial of
42. Berman . Chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia: standard chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of poor pro-
high-dose, higher expectations. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1-4. gnosis nonseminomatous germ-cell tunors. J Clin Oncol 1988;
43. Pleisler , Davis RB, Kirshner J, et al. Combination of three 6: 1031-40.
remission induction regimens and two postinduction strategies 57. Nichols CR, Williams SD, Loeher PJ, et al. Randomized study
for the treatment of acute non-lymphocytic leukemia. Can- of cisplatin dose-intensity in poor-risk germ-cell tumours.
cer and Acute Leukemia Group study. Blood 1987; 69: 1441- Southeastem Cancer Study Group and Southwest Oncology
49. Group protocol. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1163-72.
44. Dillman RO, Davis RB, Green MR, et al. comparative study 58. Ngan , Choo YC, Cheung , et al. randomized study of
two different doses of cytarabine for acute myeloid leukemia. high-dose vs low-dose cisplatin combined with cyclophospha-
phase III trial of Cancer and Acute Leukemia Group . mide in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Chemothe-
Blood 1991; 78: 2520-6. rapy 1989; 35: 221-27.
45. Schiller G, Gajewski J, Nimer S, et al. randomized study of 59. McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Assessment of
intermediate versus conventional dose cytarabine as intensive dose-intensity therapy in suboptimally debulked ovarian can-
induction for acute myelogenous leukemia. Brit J Haemat 1992; cer. gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 1995;
81: 170-7. 13: 1589-99.
46. Weick J, Kopecky , Appelbaum F, et al. randomized inve- 60. Kaye SB, Lewis CR, Paul J, et al. Randomized study of two
stigation of high-dose versus standard dose cytosine-arabinosi- doses of cisplatin with cyclophosphamide in epithelial ovarian
de with daunorubicin in patients with acute myelogenous leu- cancer. Lancet 340: 329-33.
kemia. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1992; 11: 261. 61. Bolis G, Favalli G, Giardina G, et al. multicenter randomiz-
47. ayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, et al. Intensive postremissin ed trial comparing weekly platinum (PW) vs cyclophosphami-
chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Engl J de plus platinum (CP) in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). Proc
Med 1994; 331: 896-903. Amer Soc Clin Oncol 1994; 13 (abst 820): 259.
48. Carde , Meerwaldt JH, van Glabbeke , et al. Superiority of 62. Colombo , Pitteli MR, Parma G, et al. Cisplatin dose-intensi-
second over first generation chemotherapy in a randomized ty in advanced ovarian cancer. randomized study of conven-
trial of stage III-IV intermediate and high-grade non-Hodg- tional dose vs dose-intense cisplatin monochemotherapy. Proc
kins lymphoma (NHL). The 1980-1985 EORTC trial. nn Am Soc Clin Oncol 1993; 12: 255 (abstr).
Oncol 1991; 2: 431-435. 63. Garmo-Pereira J, Costa FO, Henriques , et al. comparison
49. Longo DL, De Vita VT Jr, Duffey PL, et al. Superiority of of two doses of adriamycin in the primary chemotherapy of
ProMACE-CytaBOM over ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment disseminated breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1987; 56: 471-3.
of advanced diffuse aggresive lymphoma. Results of a pros- 64. Tannock IF, Boyd NF, Deboer G, et al. randomized trial of
pective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 25-38. two dose levels of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluo-
50. Montserrat , Garcia-Coode J, Vicolas , et al. ProMACE- rouracil chemotherapy, for patients with metastatic breast can-
CytaBOM vs CHOP in the treatment of unfavorable lympho- cer. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 1377-87.
598 OY

65. Hortobagyi GN, Bodney GP, Burdrar , et al. Evaluation of mized comparison of continuous infusion fluorouracil with a
high-dose vs standard FAC chemotherapy for advanced breast conventional bolus schedule in metastatic colorectal carcino-
cancer in protected environment units: a prospective randomi- ma. mid-Atlantic Oncology Program Study. J Clin Oncol
zed study. J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 354- 64. 1989; 7: 425-32.
66. Ebbs SR, Saunders JA, Graham , et al. Advanced breast can- 81. Slevin ML, Clark , Joel SP, et al. randomized trial to eva-
cer, a randomized trial of epirubicin at two different dosages luate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in
and two administration systems. Acta Oncol 1989; 28: 887-92. small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1333-40.
67. Habeshaw T, Jones R, Stallard S, et al. Epirubicin at two dose 82. Johnson DH, Greco F, Strupp J, et al. Prolonged administra-
levels with prednisone as treatment for advanced breast can- tion of oral etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory
cer. Results of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 295- small-cell lung cancer. phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8:
304. 1613-7.
68. Focan C, Andrien JM, Closon , et al. Prospective rando- 83. Murphy , Hainsworth JD, Greco FA, et al. phase II trial
mized trial for evaluation of dose-response relationship in ad- of cisplatin and prolonged administration of oral etoposide in
vanced breast carcinoma treated with epirubicin. J Clin Oncol extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Cancer 1992; 69: 370-5.
1993; 11: 1253-63. 84. Miller , Herndon JE, Hollis DR, et al. Schedule dependen-
69. The French epirubicin study group. prospective randomized cy of 21-day oral versus 3-day intravenous etoposide in com-
trial comparing epirubicin monochemotherapy to two fluorou- bination with intravenous cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell
racil, cyclophosphamide, and epirubicin regimens differing in lung cancer: a randomized phase III study of the cancer and
epirubicin dose in advanced breast cancer patients. J Clin On- leukemia group . J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1871-9.
col 1991; 9: 305-312. 85. Gundersen S, Kvinsland S, Klepp O, et al. Weekly adriamycin
70. Basthold L, Dalmark , Gjedde S, et al. pirubicin at four dif- versus VAC in advanced breast cancer. randomized trial.
ferent dose levels in metastatic breast cancer. randomized Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1986; 22: 1431-4.
trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1992; 11: 56. 86. Bielack FM, Erttman R, Winkler , et al. Doxorubicin: effect
71. Wood WC, Budman DR, Korzum , et al. Dose and dose- of different schedules on toxicity and anti-tumor efficacy. Eur
intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage , node positive J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25: 873-82.
breast cancer. Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1253-9. 87. Twelves CJ, Raminez AJ, Richards , et al. comparison
of response, survival, and quality of life (QOL) using 2 doxoru-
72. Dimitrof , Anderson S, Fisher , et al. Dose intensification
bicin schedules of equal dose-intensity in metastatic breast
and increased total dose of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast
cancer. Br J Cancer 1990; 62: 498-9.
cancer (BC): findings from NSABP -22. Proc Am Soc Clin
Oncol 1994; 64: (abst 58). 88. Blomqvist C, Elomaa L, Rissanen , et al. Influence of treat-
ment schedule on toxicity and efficacy of cyclophosphamide,
73. Cohen , Greaven PJ, Fossieck , et al. Intensive chemo-
epirubicin, and fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer: a ran-
therapy of small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Treat
domized trial comparing weekly and every-4-week administra-
Rep 1977; 61: 349-54.
tion. J Clin Oncol 1993; : 467-73.
74. ODonell MR, Ruckdeschel JC, Baxter D, et al. Intensive in-
89. Bonadona G, Zambetti , Valagusa , et al. Sequential vs al-
duction chemotherapy for small cell anaplastic carcinoma of
ternating adjuvant chemotherapy with adriamycin (O) and
the lung. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 571-5.
CMF. Ten years result in breast cancer with >3 positive no-
75. Figueredo AT, Hryniuk WM, Strautmanis I, et al. Cotrimoxa- des. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1995; 14: 118.
zole prophylaxis during high-dose chemotherapy for small cell 90. Miles DW, Earl , Souhami RL, et al. ntensive weekly che-
lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1985; 54: 54-64. motherapy for good prognosis patients with small-cell lung
76. Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Birch D, et al. randomized trial cancer. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 280-5.
of high-dose versus conventional dose cyclosphamide, doxoru- 91. Murray , Shah , Osoba D, et al. Intensive weekly chemo-
bicine, and vincristine for extensive stage small cell lung can- therapy for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung
cer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. cancer. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1632-8.
J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 1731-8.
92. Miles DW, Rudd RM, Trask CWL, et al. Received dose-inten-
77. Wolff SN, Birch R, Sama , et al. Randomized dose-response sity: randomized trial of weekly chemotherapy with and
evaluation of etoposide in small cell carcinoma of the lung. without granulocyte colony stimulating factor in small-cell lung
Southeastern Cancer Study Group trial. Cancer Treat Rep cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 77-82.
1986; 70: 583-7. 93. Sculier JP, Raesmans , Burea UG, et al. Multiple-drug
78. Ihde DC, Mulshine JL, Kramer BS, et al. Prospective rando- weekly chemotherapy versus standard combination regimen in
mized comparison of high-dose and standard dose etoposide small-cell lung cancer: phase III randomized study condu-
and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage cted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin
small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2022-34. Oncol 1993; 11: 1858-65.
79. Arriagada R, Le Chevalier , Pignon J-P, et al. Initial chemo- 94. Souhami RL, Rudd R, Ruiz de Elivta MC, et al. Randomized
therapeutic dose and survival in patients with limited small-cell trial comparing weekly versus 3-week chemotherapy in small-
lung cancer. Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1848-52. cell lung cancer: cancer research campaign trial. J Clin On-
80. Ldkich JJ, Ahlgren JD, Gullo JJ, et al. prospective rando- col 1994; 12: 1806-13.
VII. 599

95. Bloomfield CD, Lawrence D, Arthur DC, et al. Curative im- high-dose chemotherapy compared with standard-dose PEB/
pact of intensification with high-dose cytarabine in acute mye- VIP chemotherapy in patients with advanced germ-cell tu-
loid leukemia varies by cytogenetic group. Blood 1994; 84: 11a. mors: a multivariate and matched-pair analysis. J Clin Oncol
96. Muss , Thor AD, Berry DA, et al. c-erbB2 expression and 1999; 17: 3450-56.
response to adjuvant therapy in women with node positive ear- 105. Chevreau C, Droz J, Pico J, et al. Early intensified chemothe-
ly breast cancer. Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1260-6. rapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation in first line
97. Fountzilas G, Papadimitriou C, Dafni U, et al. Dose-dense se- treatment of poor risk non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours.
quential chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel versus Eur J Urol 1993; 23: 213-18.
the combination, as first-line chemotherapy, in advanced breast 106. Bhatia S, Abonour R, Porcu P, et al. High-dose chemotherapy
cancer: a randomized study conducted by the Hellenic Coope- as initial salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed testi-
rative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2232-39. cular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 18: 3346-51.
98. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. Randomized trial 107. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Sheinfeld J, et al. Sequential dose-
of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential intensive paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide sa-
versus concurrent conbination chemotherapy as postoperative vage therapy for germ-cell tumor patients. J Clin Oncol 2000;
adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: 18: 1173-1180.
first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia 108. Rosti G, Pico J, Wandt H, et al. High-dose chemotherapy
Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1431-39. (HDC) in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line
99. Bierman J, Vose JM, Armitage JO. Autologous transplanta- platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ-cell tumors (GCT);
tion for Hodgkins disease: coming of age? Blood 1994; 83: first results of a prospective randomized trial of the European
1161-4. Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT): IT-
100. Aisenberg AC. Coherent view of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. J 94 study. Proc ASCO 2002; 21: 716A.
Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2656-75. 109. Scmitz N, Pfistner B, Sextro M, et al. Aggressive conventional
101. Eddy DM. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with
marrw transplantation the treatment of metastatic breast can- autologous hemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relap-
cer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 10: 557-70. sed chemosensitive Hodgkins disease: A randomized trial.
102. Peters WR, Ross , Vredenburg JJ, et al. High-dose chemo- Lancet 2002; 359: 2065-71.
therapy and autologous bone marrw support as consolida- 110. Linch DC, Goldstone AH. High-dose therapy for Hodgkins
tion after standard-dose adjuvant therapy for high-risk breast disease. Br J Haematol 1999; 107: 685-90.
cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1132-43. 111. Mokowitz CH. Controversies in the management of relapsed
103. Jones RH, Vasey PA. Testicular cancer-management of ad- and primary refractory Hodgkins lymphoma. ASCO 2004; E-
vanced disease. Lancet Oncology 2003; 4: 738-47. ducational Book: 360-67.
104. Bokemeyer C, Kollmannsberger C, Meisner C, et al. First-line
VII
H



B. . M ...................................................................................................... 603


B. . M ...................................................................................................... 641


B. . M ...................................................................................................... 645

. .

OOI O OO , -
. -
(, - , , -
, ), FSH
FSH -
-
. , 37% -
, -
o, -
.
-, SHBG (Sex Hor-
-
mone Binding Globulin),
17- , - (60%) -
, . - , (3%) -

. - . O
- , -
, , - .
. O -
. -
1.
, . -
- . -
. .




(FSH + LH)
LH-RH
()


(ACTH)

1. .

603
604 OY

- . -
. - , -
-
. . -
,
. ,
(LH) v, , ,
- , :
. - ) O -
. .
) O , , -

v. O - .
, , O o -
, - .
, ov-oo -
, -
- -
- , -
, (. 2).
. - oo -
- - . O
-
, - DNA, -
, oov, . O -
- () 80.000 dal-

You might also like