The CIA director confirmed that waterboarding, or simulated drowning, had been used on three high-ranking al Qaeda suspects shortly after 9/11 because officials feared another imminent attack and lacked information about al Qaeda. While the technique is controversial, the CIA director and Director of National Intelligence said it could be a legal interrogation method in certain circumstances. Senators disputed the need to retain coercive interrogation options like waterboarding, which many want to outlaw, but the intelligence officials defended their use and legality in the post-9/11 context.
The CIA director confirmed that waterboarding, or simulated drowning, had been used on three high-ranking al Qaeda suspects shortly after 9/11 because officials feared another imminent attack and lacked information about al Qaeda. While the technique is controversial, the CIA director and Director of National Intelligence said it could be a legal interrogation method in certain circumstances. Senators disputed the need to retain coercive interrogation options like waterboarding, which many want to outlaw, but the intelligence officials defended their use and legality in the post-9/11 context.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The CIA director confirmed that waterboarding, or simulated drowning, had been used on three high-ranking al Qaeda suspects shortly after 9/11 because officials feared another imminent attack and lacked information about al Qaeda. While the technique is controversial, the CIA director and Director of National Intelligence said it could be a legal interrogation method in certain circumstances. Senators disputed the need to retain coercive interrogation options like waterboarding, which many want to outlaw, but the intelligence officials defended their use and legality in the post-9/11 context.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Qaeda Suspects Democratic senators clashed with intelligence officials Tuesday over interrogation techniques, questioning the need for harsh tactics, as the nation’s top intelligence chiefs defended their legality and said they wanted to keep the authority to use them. At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, CIA Director Gen. Michael V. Hayden acknowledged publicly for the first time that waterboarding, or simulated drowning, had been used on three al Qaeda suspects — Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, the suspected mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri — because officials feared more attacks on the United States were imminent at the time and did not know enough about how al Qaeda worked. Hayden said the technique, the use of which has drawn harsh criticism, has not been used in almost five years because the agency has more knowledge to bring to bear in questioning detainees. Legislation authorizing fiscal 2008 intelligence programs would bar the CIA from employing any techniques, including waterboarding, not authorized by the September 2006 Army Field Manual on Human Intelligence Collector Operations. The bill has been placed on hold by Sen. Lindsey Graham , R-S.C., over objections to the provision. Hayden said it would “make no sense” to apply the manual’s restrictions to the CIA. “Who’s doing it is different,” he said. “Who they’re doing it to is also different.” The CIA program involves fewer than 100 detainees, he said, and “fewer than one- third have had any of what we call the enhanced interrogation techniques used against them.” Senators disputed Hayden’s suggestion that the CIA needs to retain the option of using coercive techniques, such as waterboarding, which many lawmakers want to outlaw. But Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell backed him up, saying waterboarding could be legal under certain circumstances. “The question, is waterboarding a legal technique?” McConnell said. “And everything I know, based on the appropriate authority to make that judgment, it is a legal technique used in a specific set of circumstances. You have to know the circumstances to be able to make the judgment.”