The document discusses performance appraisals and how to make them more effective. It notes that performance appraisals often fail due to employee anxiety, lack of objectivity, and leniency or strictness in evaluations. 360-degree evaluations are recommended as they provide input from multiple levels both within and outside an organization, focusing on cross-organizational skills in a more objective manner. Both internal factors like corporate culture and external ones like legislation can impact the effectiveness of performance appraisals. Different evaluation techniques are compared, and the roles of both employees and employers in achieving performance standards are outlined.
The document discusses performance appraisals and how to make them more effective. It notes that performance appraisals often fail due to employee anxiety, lack of objectivity, and leniency or strictness in evaluations. 360-degree evaluations are recommended as they provide input from multiple levels both within and outside an organization, focusing on cross-organizational skills in a more objective manner. Both internal factors like corporate culture and external ones like legislation can impact the effectiveness of performance appraisals. Different evaluation techniques are compared, and the roles of both employees and employers in achieving performance standards are outlined.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses performance appraisals and how to make them more effective. It notes that performance appraisals often fail due to employee anxiety, lack of objectivity, and leniency or strictness in evaluations. 360-degree evaluations are recommended as they provide input from multiple levels both within and outside an organization, focusing on cross-organizational skills in a more objective manner. Both internal factors like corporate culture and external ones like legislation can impact the effectiveness of performance appraisals. Different evaluation techniques are compared, and the roles of both employees and employers in achieving performance standards are outlined.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
1. List three reasons why performance appraisal fail
· Employee anxiety · Lack of objective · Leniency/ strictness
2. Why 360 degree evaluation provides effective result for evaluate performance of employees. · Multi-rater evaluation · Input from multiple levels with firm and external sources · Focuses on skills needed across organizational boundaries · More objective measure of performance · Process more legally defensible
3. What factors that contribute the effectiveness of performance
appraisal. · External : - Legislation requiring nondiscriminatory appraisal systems - Labor unions · Factors within the internal environment, such as type of corporate culture
4. Differentiate between critical incident techniques with paired
comparison techniques. Critical incident techniques Paired comparison techniques appraisal more likely to cover entire compares performance of evaluation period each employee with every other employee in the group does not focus on last few weeks or variation of ranking method months written records of highly favorable and unfavorable actions
5. 3 roles of employees and 3 roles of employer to make sure
performance achieve the actual standard: roles of employees roles of employer Join training to improve KSA to Provide cost to training program. overcome the weakness. Follow performance appraisal Provide mentor to guide standard. employees. Find mentor to guide them how to Always evaluate employee’s achieve a good performance. performance