Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Translation Methods: - Current/Noncurrent Method - Monetary/Nonmonetary Method - Temporal Method - Current Rate Method
Translation Methods: - Current/Noncurrent Method - Monetary/Nonmonetary Method - Temporal Method - Current Rate Method
• Current/Noncurrent Method
• Monetary/Nonmonetary Method
• Temporal Method
• Current Rate Method
Current/Noncurrent Method
• The underlying principal is that assets and
liabilities should be translated based on their
maturity.
– Current assets translated at the spot rate.
– Noncurrent assets translated at the historical rate in
effect when the item was first recorded on the books.
• This method of foreign currency translation was
generally accepted in the United States from the
1930s until 1975, at which time FASB 8 became
effective.
Current/Noncurrent Method
– Current assets
translated at
Balance Sheet Local Current/
the spot rate. Currency Noncurrent
e.g. DM2=$1 Cash 2,100 DM $1,050
– Noncurrent Inventory 1,500 DM $750
assets Net fixed assets 3,000 DM $1,000
translated at Total Assets 6,600 DM $2,800
the historical Current liabilities 1,200 DM $600
rate in effect Long-Term debt 1,800 DM $600
Common stock 2,700 DM $900
when the item
Retained earnings 900 DM $700
was first
CTA -------- --------
recorded on Total Liabilities and 6,600 DM $2,800
the books. Equity
e.g. DM3=$1
Monetary/Nonmonetary Method
• The underlying principal is that monetary accounts
have a similarity because their value represents a
sum of money whose value changes as the exchange
rate changes.
• All monetary balance sheet accounts (cash,
marketable securities, accounts receivable, etc.) of a
foreign subsidiary are translated at the current
exchange rate.
• All other (nonmonetary) balance sheet accounts
(owners’ equity, land) are translated at the historical
exchange rate in effect when the account was first
recorded.
Monetary/Nonmonetary Method
• All monetary
balance sheet Balance Sheet Local Monetary/
accounts are Currency Nonmonetary
translated at the Cash 2,100 DM $1,050
current exchange Inventory 1,500 DM $500
rate. e.g. Net fixed assets 3,000 DM $1,000
DM2=$1 Total Assets 6,600 DM $2,550
• All other balance Current liabilities 1,200 DM $600
Long-Term debt 1,800 DM $900
sheet accounts
Common stock 2,700 DM $900
are translated at Retained earnings 900 DM $0
the historical CTA -------- --------
exchange rate in Total Liabilities and 6,600 DM $2,400
effect when the Equity
account was first
recorded.
e.g.DM3=$1
Temporal Method
• The underlying principal is that assets and
liabilities should be translated based on how they
are carried on the firm’s books.
• Balance sheet account are translated at the current
spot exchange rate if they are carried on the books
at their current value.
• Items that are carried on the books at historical
costs are translated at the historical exchange rates
in effect at the time the firm placed the item on the
books.
Temporal Method
• Items carried on
the books at their
current value are Balance Sheet Local Temporal
translated at the Currency
spot exchange Cash 2,100 DM $1,050
rate. Inventory 1,500 DM $900
Net fixed assets 3,000 DM $1,000
e.g. DM2=$1 Total Assets 6,600 DM $2,950
• Items that are Current liabilities 1,200 DM $600
carried on the Long-Term debt 1,800 DM $900
books at historical Common stock 2,700 DM $900
costs are Retained earnings 900 DM $0
CTA -------- --------
translated at the
Total Liabilities and 6,600 DM $2,400
historical Equity
exchange rates.
e.g. DM3=$1
Current Rate Method
No • Yes
• The value of the firm is • Investors don’t have
the PV of cash flows enough information to
• Translation exposure estimate cash flows and
doesn’t effect cash flows, instead must rely on
so ignore it reported earnings.
• If reported earnings are
distorted by translation
issues, investors will
misvalue the firm.
Hedging Translation Exposure
• We will talk about hedging instruments in some detail in
the next two sections (dealing with operating and
transactions exposure). Much of what will be learned
there can be applied here.
• But the really essential question is whether managers
should worry about translation exposure. Remember, by
definition, translation exposure doesn’t describe what is
happening to cash flows, just how the firm is perceived.
• Thus, one should ask whether managers ought to devote
time and money to hedging what amounts to cosmetics
Final Word: Does Translation
Exposure Matter?
• Some research has been done investigating whether the
change from FASB 8 to FASB 52 made any difference to
firm value.
• GFF (cited in your book) “Despite the impact of the
change (from 8 to 52) on reported earnings, the actual
cash flows of the multinationals would not be affected if
managers were not making suboptimal decisions based on
accounting rather than economic considerations…In such
cases, the mandated switch …should not change the value
of the firm.”
• Which is what was found.