S

tat
eof
Wel
l
-Bei
ng
S
tat
e,Ci
ty&Congr
ess
ional
Dis
tri
ctWe
ll
-Be
ingRe
por
t

Ohi
o

2010

WWW.
WEL
L-BE
INGINDEX.
COM
866.
603.
8277
 Ga
ll
up-
Hea
lthwa
ysWel
l
-Bei
ngI
nde
x®
The Ga l
lup-Healt
hwa ysWel l
-Being Index(WBI)isthe preeminent
sourceforhea l
thandwel l-
bei
ngda taintheUni
tedStates.Surv
eying
1,000Amer i
cansada y,350da y
say ear
,theWBIisthe rstandmos t
compr ehensivesurveyofitsk i
nd,pr ovi
dingt
hel a
rgestdatabaseof
behavioraleconomicmet ri
cs.
It’
st heonlymeasureoftota
lwell-
being
i
nex is
tenc etoday.

TheWBI gi
vesgovernment s,
communi t
ies,employersandhea l
thpla
ns
unma tchedinsi
ghti ntothehealt
hoft heirpopula
tions.Leader
sa r
e
usingtheWBI ndi ngst oqua nt
if
ya ndbenc hma r
kt hewel l
-bei
ngof
theiremployeesa nd cit
izenstoinfor
m dec i
si
onsr egardi
nghea lt
h
benet s,wor k environments,corporatec ult
urea nd communi t
y
i
nv est
ment .

Withthr
eeyearsofdatacol l
ectionandsurveysofmor etha n1.1mill
ion
America
ns,theWBI hasga rnereds i
gnicantnati
onala ndint er
nati
onal
rec
ogniti
on.TheWBIa nda ssociat
edCity,Sta
tea ndCongr essi
onal
Dis
tri
ctReportsprovidel eader swiththeintel
li
genc et heyneedt o
ass
essandenha ncehealth, happinessa
ndpr oducti
vity.Ov erthenext
quart
ercentur
y,theWBIwi llsurveymorethan9mi ll
ionpeopl einthe
Unit
ed States
,pr ovi
ding t imelya nd in-
depthi nforma tion about
America
ns’heal
tha ndwel l-
being.

Met
hodol
ogy
Theresearc
ha ndmet hodol
ogyunder l
yingtheGa l
lup-Healt
hways
Well
-Being Indexa nd the S t
ate and Congr es
s i
onal Dist
ric
t
Well
-Being Reportsareba s
ed on theWor l
d Healt
h Or ga
nizat
ion
deni t
ionofhea l
th,whichi
s,“
..
.
notonlytheabsenceofinr mityand
dis
easebuta l
soas t
ateofphysi
cal
,mentalandsoci
alwell-
being.
”

Toc ompi let he Well

-Being Index, Gall
up obt ai
ns compl eted
i
ntervi
ewsf r
om 1,000U.S .adult
sna ti
onall
y,seven daysaweek ,
excl
uding onl y ma j
or holidays. Ba s
ed on t hei
rr espons e,
i
ndivi
dua lsa nd c ommuni t
ies receive a n overall wel l
-bei
ng
compos it
escoreandas coreofeachofs i
xs ub-i
ndic
esincludingl if
e
eval
uation,emoti
ona l
health,
phy s
ica
l heal
th,heal
thybehav ior
, work
envi
ronmenta ndba si
caccess
.

Changes in condit
ion can be t r
acked over t i
me ,and the
i
ntroducti
on of bot h control
l
ed a nd unc ontrol
led va
ria
ble
consi
dered. Di
scr
etepopulat
ionscana l
sober ankedonea gains
t
anotherf
orastr
atiedviewofthei
rrel
ati
vewell
-being.

Formorei
nfor
ma t
ion:
615.
614.
4440–Hea l
thways
404.
267.
7711–Gallup
WE L
LBEI
NGINDEX@hea l
thway
s.c
om
Regi
st
eredTr
adema
rk®2010Gall
up-
Hea
lthwa
ysWell
-Bei
ngIndex.Allr
ight
sres
erv
ed.
Copyr
ight
s©2010Gal
l
up,Inc
.,a
ndHeal
thway
s,I
nc.Allr
ight
sres
erved.

WELL
WWW. -BEI
NGI
NDEX.
COM
State of Ohio Well-Being
Ranking from data collected January 2, 2010 – December 30, 2010
1 HI
Result Rank 2 WY
3 ND
2009 2010 2009 2010
4 AK
5 CO
Well-Being Overall 64.0 63.8 47 45 6 MN
7 SD
Life Evaluation 44.0 44.1 45 48 8 UT
9 CT
Emotional Health 77.0 77.2 46 46 10 NE
11 MA

Physical Health 75.5 75.1 38 41 12 WA

13 MD
14 MT
Healthy Behavior 59.0 60.4 46 43 15 NH
16 KS
Work Environment 47.1 44.9 42 44 17 VT

2010 WELL-BEING STATE RANKING

18 CA
Basic Access 81.5 81.2 30 32 19 IA
20 ID
21 VA
*#1 is the top Rank and 50 the bottom 22 WI
*#0 is the bottom Result and 100 the top (see methodology for descriptions) 23 NM
*Source: Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index Survey 2010, n = 352,840 and 2009, n = 353,849 24 NJ
25 ME
26 IL
27 TX
28 OR
29 AZ
30 PA
31 GA
32 NY
33 RI
34 MO
35 SC
36 NC
37 FL
38 OK
39 IN
40 TN
41 MI
42 LA
43 NV
44 DE
45 OH
46 AL
47 AR
48 MS
49 KY
50 WV
TOP QUINTILE 2ND QUINTILE 3rd QUINTILE 4TH QUINTILE 5TH QUINTILE

WWW.WELL-BEINGINDEX.COM
Ohio City Rankings
Ranking from data collected January 2, 2010 – December 30, 2010

Canton Columbus Cincinnati Akron Cleveland

STATE
407,180 1,773,120 2,155,137 699,356 2,088,291

2010 87 118 123 141 167 45

Overall Rank
2009 145 102 123 147 150 47

Life Evaluation
2010 131 119 135 111 149 48
2009 148 77 132 143 127 45

Emotional Health
2010 155 139 149 127 129 46
2009 135 152 151 88 106 46

Physical Health
2010 115 124 132 104 93 41
2009 128 124 113 51 74 38

Healthy Behavior
2010 148 171 153 164 129 43
2009 174 152 164 184 157 46

Work Environment
2010 14 65 68 162 184 44
2009 51 79 73 126 174 42

Basic Access
2010 72 68 75 84 88 32
2009 112 70 58 82 81 30

*Ranking of 188 Cities, following U.S. Census Bureau Definitions for Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
*Source: Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index Survey 2010, n = 352,840 and 2009, n = 353,849
*Source: Wikipedia.org 2010, City Population

TOP QUINTILE 2ND QUINTILE 3rd QUINTILE 4TH QUINTILE 5TH QUINTILE

WWW.WELL-BEINGINDEX.COM
Ohio City Rankings
Ranking from data collected January 2, 2010 – December 30, 2010

Dayton Toledo Youngstown Huntington

STATE
836,544 650,955 570,704 284,026

2010 171 177 187 188 45

Overall Rank
2009 161 172 181 184 47

Life Evaluation
2010 170 133 188 180 48
2009 117 167 180 178 45

Emotional Health
2010 164 176 185 188 46
2009 129 80 180 186 46

Physical Health
2010 154 162 186 188 41
2009 158 122 180 185 38

Healthy Behavior
2010 186 147 139 161 43
2009 148 131 176 158 46

Work Environment
2010 88 178 109 185 44
2009 171 186 96 158 42

Basic Access
2010 111 154 164 183 32
2009 110 129 165 180 30

*Ranking of 188 Cities, following U.S. Census Bureau Definitions for Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
*Source: Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index Survey 2010, n = 352,840 and 2009, n = 353,849
*Source: Wikipedia.org 2010, City Population

TOP QUINTILE 2ND QUINTILE 3rd QUINTILE 4TH QUINTILE 5TH QUINTILE

WWW.WELL-BEINGINDEX.COM
Ohio Congressional District Rankings
Ranking from data collected January 2, 2010 – December 30, 2010

OH-01 OH-02 OH-03 OH-04 OH-05 OH-06 STATE

2010 360 196 408 398 356 425 45
Overall Rank
2009 344 268 327 400 346 423 47

Life Evaluation
2010 290 297 356 391 415 426 48
2009 372 247 262 430 402 424 45

Emotional Health
2010 380 240 381 394 263 408 46
2009 211 425 279 324 142 418 46

Physical Health
2010 342 318 401 332 188 429 41
2009 237 320 336 339 193 424 38

Healthy Behavior
2010 400 383 429 390 402 385 43
2009 343 393 353 397 325 433 46

Work Environment
2010 258 31 356 366 311 323 44
2009 239 57 297 228 303 197 42

Basic Access
2010 323 118 257 260 174 330 32
2009 337 144 263 292 251 388 30

*Ranking of 436 Congressional Districts

*Source: Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index Survey 2010, n = 352,840 and 2009, n = 353,849

TOP QUINTILE 2ND QUINTILE 3rd QUINTILE 4TH QUINTILE 5TH QUINTILE

WWW.WELL-BEINGINDEX.COM
Ohio Congressional District Rankings
Ranking from data collected January 2, 2010 – December 30, 2010

OH-07 OH-08 OH-09 OH-10 OH-11 OH-12 STATE

2010 395 378 403 410 349 136 45
Overall Rank
2009 383 240 399 386 389 133 47

Life Evaluation
2010 409 369 301 333 176 118 48
2009 298 259 411 360 323 82 45

Emotional Health
2010 385 379 416 429 156 163 46
2009 423 268 297 260 170 202 46

Physical Health
2010 292 360 381 349 203 267 41
2009 387 274 273 245 228 145 38

Healthy Behavior
2010 434 386 334 320 220 367 43
2009 358 328 357 394 346 275 46

Work Environment
2010 255 371 394 411 424 45 44
2009 315 128 376 413 410 231 42

Basic Access
2010 244 184 334 292 398 122 32
2009 293 192 309 193 390 115 30

*Ranking of 436 Congressional Districts

*Source: Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index Survey 2010, n = 352,840 and 2009, n = 353,849

TOP QUINTILE 2ND QUINTILE 3rd QUINTILE 4TH QUINTILE 5TH QUINTILE

WWW.WELL-BEINGINDEX.COM
Ohio Congressional District Rankings
Ranking from data collected January 2, 2010 – December 30, 2010

OH-13 OH-14 OH-15 OH-16 OH-17 OH-18 STATE

2010 355 309 295 169 428 417 45
Overall Rank
2009 345 126 241 335 425 413 47

Life Evaluation
2010 292 404 219 170 433 430 48
2009 294 157 156 379 427 410 45

Emotional Health
2010 189 200 339 138 421 420 46
2009 374 207 273 251 381 422 46

Physical Health
2010 237 239 279 139 402 410 41
2009 249 78 298 214 396 402 38

Healthy Behavior
2010 317 399 371 258 424 393 43
2009 429 295 411 361 425 368 46

Work Environment
2010 427 252 312 247 373 223 44
2009 274 188 139 287 353 279 42

Basic Access
2010 159 87 213 111 328 341 32
2009 224 49 227 203 378 369 30

*Ranking of 436 Congressional Districts

*Source: Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index Survey 2010, n = 352,840 and 2009, n = 353,849

TOP QUINTILE 2ND QUINTILE 3rd QUINTILE 4TH QUINTILE 5TH QUINTILE

WWW.WELL-BEINGINDEX.COM
 State Congressional District Definitions
Congressional District #1
Cities: Cincinnati (partial)
Counties: Hamilton (partial), Butler (partial)
Congressional District #2
Cities: Cincinnati (partial)
Counties: Warren (partial), Hamilton (partial),
Clermont, Brown, Adams, Pike, Scioto (partial)
Congressional District #3
Cities: Dayton, Kettering
Counties: Montgomery (partial), Warren (partial),
Clinton, Highland
Congressional District #4
Cities: Lima, Marion, Findlay, Mansfield
Counties: Allen, Auglaize, Shelby, Logan,
Champaign, Hardin, Hancock, Wyandot (partial),
Marion, Morrow, Richland
Congressional District #5
Cities: Bowling Green
Counties: Williams, Defiance, Fulton, Henry,
Paulding, Van Wert, Mercer (partial), Putnam, Wood,
Lucas (partial), Sandusky (partial), Seneca, Wyandot
(partial), Crawford, Huron, Ashland (partial)
Congressional District #6
Cities: No major cities
Counties: Scioto (partial), Lawrence, Gallia, Meigs,
Athens (partial), Washington, Noble, Monroe,
Belmont (partial), Jefferson, Columbiana, Mahoning
(partial)
Congressional District #7
Cities: Lancaster, Columbus (partial)
Counties: Clark, Greene, Fayette, Pickaway, Ross
(partial), Franklin (partial), Fairfield, Perry
Congressional District #8
Cities: Middletown, Hamilton, Fairfield
Counties: Mercer (partial), Darke, Miami,
Montgomery (partial), Preble, Butler (partial)
Congressional District #9
Cities: Toledo, Sandusky
Counties: Lucas, Ottawa, Erie, Lorain (partial)
WWW.WELL-BEINGINDEX.COM
Congressional District #10
Cities: Cleveland (partial), Parma
Counties: Cuyahoga (partial)
Congressional District #11
Cities: Cleveland (partial), Euclid
Counties: Cuyahoga (partial)
Congressional District #12
Cities: Westerville
Counties: Franklin (partial), Licking (partial),
Delaware
Congressional District #13
Cities: Cleveland (partial), Akron (partial)
Counties: Cuyahoga (partial), Lorain (partial),
Medina (partial), Summit (partial)
Congressional District #14
Cities: Cleveland (partial)
Counties: Ashtabula, Lake, Geauga, Trumbull
(partial), Portage (partial), Summit (partial),
Cuyahoga (partial)
Congressional District #15
Cities: Columbus (partial)
Counties: Union, Franklin (partial), Madison
Congressional District #16
Cities: Massillon, Canton
Counties: Medina, Ashland (partial), Wayne,
Stark
Congressional District #17
Cities: Youngstown
Counties: Trumbull (partial), Portage (partial),
Mahoning (partial), Summit (partial)
Congressional District #18
Cities: Zanesville
Counties: Knox, Holmes, Coshocton,
Tuscarawas, Carroll, Harrison, Belmont (partial),
Morgan, Guernsey, Athens (partial), Hocking,
Vinton, Jackson, Ross (partial)
*Source: Wikipedia.org 2010, Congressional District
Definitions
 Aboutt
heSt
ate,
Congr
ess
ional
Dis
tri
ct&Ci
tyRepor
ts
Sur
veyDat
es: J
anua
ry2,
2010t
hroughDec
ember30,
2010

Sampl
eInf
ormat
ion: T
ota
lSur
vey
s: 352,
840r
espondent
saged18a
ndol
der
Ma
ximum S
ampl
eSi
ze: Cit
ies
:14,793respondents
St
ates:35,543respondent
s
Congress
ionalDistr
ict
s:2,
073r
espondent
s
Mi
nimum S
ampl
eSi
ze: Ci
ti
es:
324respondents
St
ates
:974respondents
Congr
ess
ionalDis
tri
ct:
300r
espondent
s*

Mar
ginofEr
ror
: F
orresul
tsbasedont
heovera
ll352,
840r
espondent
s,onecansaywit
h95%c
on denc
e
t
hatthema x
imum margi
nofsampli
nger
roris±0.
2percent
agepoint
s.
•F
orr
esul
tsba
sedon5,
000,±1.
4perc
entagepoi
nts
•F
orr
esul
tsba
sedon1,
000,±3.
1perc
entagepoi
nts
•F
orr
esul
tsba
sedon500,
±4.4per
centa
gepoint
s
•F
orr
esul
tsba
sedon300,
±5.7per
centa
gepoint
s

Composi
teResul
t: I
naddi
ti
ontosampl
i
ngerr
or,
quest
ionwordi
ngandpract
ica
ldifficul
ti
esi
nconduc
ting
0(bot
tom)–100(top)Sc
ale s
urv
eyscani
ntr
oduc
eer
rororbi
asi
ntothe ndi
ngsofpubli
copini
onpol
l
s.

TheWell-
BeingI ndexcompos i
teres
ultisa na verageofsixdoma i
ns:lif
eev al
ua t
ion,
emoti
onalhealth,physi
cal
healt
h,heal
thybeha vi
or s
,workenvi
ronmentandba s
ica c
cess.
Amongs t
ates,overal
lWell
-Bei
ngIndexr esult
sra ngedfr
om ahighof71.0(Hawa i
i)toa
l
ow of61.7( Wes tVi
rgi
nia)
.T he2010na t
ionala ver
ageforWell-
Beingwa s66.8,L i
fe
Eva
lua
tion-49.8,E moti
onalHeal
th–79.3,Physi
calHealt
h–76.9,Heal
thyBehavi
ors-64.1,
WorkEnvi
ronment–48. 2andBa si
cAccess-82.3.

Pos
iti
onSc
ale: Fordetai
l
eddesc
ript
ionsoft
hedoma
ins
,vi
si
tthemet
hodol
ogys
ect
ionof
www. wel
l-
bei
ngi
ndex .
com.

EachStat
eisposit
ionedfr
om 1-50,
basedonc omposit
es c
oresa
scompa redtoal
lSta
tes
;
EachCongress
iona lDi
str
ictisposi
ti
onedfrom 1-436,basedonc ompos i
tesc
oresas
compa r
ed t
oa llCongressi
onalDis
tri
cts
;EachCity( Metr
opol
it
anS t
atist
ica
lArea)is
posti
onedfr
om 1-188,basedoncompos i
tes
coresa
sc ompa r
edtoal
lCit
ies.

Thes urv eymet hodsf orGa l

lup-Hea l
thwa ysWel l-
BeingI ndex ®reliesonl ive( nota utoma ted)interviewer s,dua l
-fr
a mer andom- digit-
dial(RDD)s ampl i
ng
(whi c
hi ncludesl andl i
nesa swel laswirelessphones ampl i
ngt or eacht hosei nwi reles s
-onl yhous ehol ds),andar andom s elec t
ionmet hodf orchoos i
ngr e-
spondent swithinahous ehold. Addit
iona l
ly,dail
yt r
ackinginc ludesS pa nis
h- l
a ngua geint ervi
ewsf orr espondent swhos pea konl ySpa nish,i
ncludesinter-
viewsi nAl askaa ndHa wa ii
.Theda t
aa rewei ghtedda il
yt oc ompens atefordi spropor tiona lt
iesins elec t
ionpr oba bil
i
tiesa ndnon- respons e.
Theda t
aa re
weight edt oma tcht arget sfrom theU. S.Cens usBureaubya ge ,sex,region, gender , educ ation,ethnic i
tya ndr ace.
 
TheGa ll
up- Hea l
thwa ysWel l
-BeingInde xCompos iteScor eisc ompr isedofs i
xs ub- indic es :Li
feE val
ua tion,E mot i
ona lHea lth,PhysicalHea l
th,Hea l
thyBe-
ha vi
or,Wor kE nv i
ronmenta ndBa si
cAc cess.TheL if
eE valuati
onS ub-Inde xispa rti
a llyba s edont heCa ntri
lS elf
-AnchoringS triv
ingS cal
ea ndc ombi nesthe
ev a
luationofone ’spr es entlifesit
uati
onwi thone ’
sa nti
cipatedl if
es i
tua t
ion v ey ea rsfrom now. TheE mot i
ona lHea l
thS ub- Indexispr i
ma r
il
yac ompos ite
of r
espondent s’dailye xper i
enc es,ask
ingr espondent stot hi
nka bouthowt heyf el
ty est
er da yalongni nedi mens ions.ThePhy si
calHea l
thS ub-I
nde xiscom-
prisedofques ti
onsr elatedt o: BodyMa s
sInde x
,diseasebur den, sickda ys,phy sic
a l pain, da il
yener gy ,his
tor yofdiseasea ndda i
l
yhea lthe xperi
ences.The
Hea lt
hyBeha viorS ub- I
nde xinc l
udesitemsmea s
uringli
fes t
y leha bit
swi thes tabli
s hedr ela ti
ons hi
pst ohea l
thout comes .T heWor kE nvironmentS ub- I
nde x
surveyswor kersons ev eralfac t
orstoga uget heirfeeli
ngsa ndper ceptionsa boutt heirwor kenv ir
onment .TheBa si
cAc ces sS ub-I
nde xisba sedont hir
teen
i
temsmea suringr esident ’
sa ccesstofood, shelt
er,healt
hc area ndas afeands atis
fy ingpl ac etolive.

WELL
WWW. -BEI
NGI
NDEX.
COM
WWW. WELL-
BEI
NGI
NDE
X.COM
866.
603.
8277