The government may take private property for public use as long as it provides just compensation. There are two types of takings: a possessory taking which is direct government confiscation or occupation of property, and a regulatory taking which leaves no reasonable economic use through regulation. For a valid taking, the government action must benefit the public, compensate the owner for economic losses, and not overly burden owners through development conditions.
The government may take private property for public use as long as it provides just compensation. There are two types of takings: a possessory taking which is direct government confiscation or occupation of property, and a regulatory taking which leaves no reasonable economic use through regulation. For a valid taking, the government action must benefit the public, compensate the owner for economic losses, and not overly burden owners through development conditions.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The government may take private property for public use as long as it provides just compensation. There are two types of takings: a possessory taking which is direct government confiscation or occupation of property, and a regulatory taking which leaves no reasonable economic use through regulation. For a valid taking, the government action must benefit the public, compensate the owner for economic losses, and not overly burden owners through development conditions.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The gov't may take private property for public use IF it provides just compensation
There are 2 types of takings:
1. Possessory Taking - gov't confiscation or physical occupation of property 2. Regulatory Taking - gov't regulation that leaves no reasonable economically viable use of the property (mere decrease in property value is NOT enough) Decreasing economic value balancing test o Dimunition in value o Owner's reasonable expectations o Social goals of the regulation Public Use o Gov't must have a reasonable belief that its action will benefit the public Just Compensation o Gov't must pay economic value of property in the hands of the owner (gain to the taker is irrelevant…ONLY concerned with loss to the owner) Notes: 1. Gov't conditions on development of property must be justified by a benefit that is roughly proportionate to the burden imposed 2. A property owner may bring a takings challenge to regulations that existed at the time the property was acquired 3. Temporarily denying an owner use of property is NOT a taking so long as the governments action is reasonable