HUMAN RESOURSE

CASE STUDY

Submitted by:
Sia Gupta-15
Q. 1) If you were the CEO of vision what decision would you take.

In this case although the employee has used fake certificates for getting the job
which is against business ethics but what actually matters for the business is
profits and clientage and also the retention of valuable employees. Therefore as
the CEO of Vision I would definitely want to retain Anand for the simple reason of
his excellent performance and contribution to the clientage for the company.
However this decision might have some repercussions on the company image and
reputation therefore the company should take the following decisions:

 Arrange a meeting with Anand and the HR team over this issue
 Reduce the perks given to Anand for the current position as remuneration
for the employees is based on the academic profile and qualifications.
 Anand could be given a paid corporate MBA for the fulfillment of the
company employment requirements.
 This issue should be kept confidential and not made public as it can put the
company in legal trouble.
 Anand should be encouraged to work harder and prove his loyalties for the
company in the future for retaining his position in the company by th HR
department.

Q.2) What repercussions would it have on the company in the future if Anand
was to be retained?

In this case as the employee has used fake certificates the retention of the same
might have the following repercussions on the company

 The junior employee who was expelled earlier might sue the
company for discrimination and violation of the company rules.
 Other employees and especially Anand’s juniors may change their
attitude towards him after knowing the truth.
 This news might become public and can harm the reputation of the
company in the market.
 Loss of clients who were earned by Anand.
Q.3) What would be the fallouts if Anand is fired?

In case Anand is fired the company can have the following fallouts:

 Loss of clients who were earned by Anand, as the whole deal was
negotiated by him.
 The money and time invested by the company on Anand’s training and
development would go waste.
 The loss of time for the recruitment of the same position.
 The company would lose a valued and profitable employee who could have
generated profits in the future.
 The CFO, Gagan Sharma who had referred Anand for the position might
show some resentment.