The document discusses a proposed national, decentralized social improvement network that would aim to improve quality and equality across different regions. It poses questions about how such a network should be governed, debating between a centralized steering committee approach versus a decentralized swarm structure. It also asks for advice on how to best align the network with existing federal efforts and maintain collaboration with government agencies.
The document discusses a proposed national, decentralized social improvement network that would aim to improve quality and equality across different regions. It poses questions about how such a network should be governed, debating between a centralized steering committee approach versus a decentralized swarm structure. It also asks for advice on how to best align the network with existing federal efforts and maintain collaboration with government agencies.
The document discusses a proposed national, decentralized social improvement network that would aim to improve quality and equality across different regions. It poses questions about how such a network should be governed, debating between a centralized steering committee approach versus a decentralized swarm structure. It also asks for advice on how to best align the network with existing federal efforts and maintain collaboration with government agencies.
• National, user-driven, decentralized social improvement network
The Good News. And the Challenge. An alternate vision—A vibrant national, swarming improvement network And that’s just “Mike’s” Galaxy… Concept Preview PSM Questions—We need your help.
• Governance?
Centralized, traditional, steering committee vs. Decentralized, swarm, social
network? How much structure? Can a network flourish with just a curator, manager hub?
• Optimizing alignment with federal efforts?
Advice on best ways to get and keep agency collaboration?