Analysis and Conclusion

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Analysis and Conclusion

Elizabeth Kramer

Chem 32L-411

Average experimental mass percent of cobalt from practice trials:

Mass Percent=Mass solute/Mass Solution

Mass Percent=CoCl2 .6H2O/ Edta + CoCl2 .6H2O

Mass of Edta= 10.4 ml*0.01 M=1.0 * 10-4 mol Edta * 372.2 g/mol

=0.038

Mass Percent for trial one = 0.024g/(0.038+0.024) = 38.27%

Mass percent for trial two= 0.024g/(0.035 + 0.024)=40.69%

Average mass percent=39.48%

Accuracy of your practice titrations and if percent error is significant (>10%), the

suspected sources of error:

Accuracy= Theoretical Percent- Actual percent

Expected Mass percent= 58.933 (the mass of Cobalt)/237.9315 (the mass of

CoCl2.6H2O)= 24.77%

Accuracy = 39.48%-24.77%=14.71%

Percent Error= (Experimental Result – Accepted Value)/(Accepted value) * 100

= (39.48-24.77)/(24.77)*100

= 59.38%
Average mass percent of cobalt in your cobalt complex:

Trial One

Mass of Praseo= 0.02g

Mass of Edta= 9.1 ml * (1L/1000 ml) * (0.01 mol/ 1L)*(372.2g/ 1 mol EDTA)

= 0.038702 g

Mass Percent= (0.02)/(0.038702+.022)* 100=37.13%

Trial Two

Mass of Praseo=0.022g

Mass Percent=(0.022)*(0.035359+0.022)*100= 38.35%

Trial Three

Mass of Praseo=0.02g

Mass percent=(0.02)*(0.027915+0.02)*100=41.74%

Average of all Three Trials: 39.07%

Accuracy= 39.07%-25%(given)=14.07%

Percent Error=(39.07-25)/25 *100= 56.28%

Error for both trials:

Error was encountered everywhere in this lab. One of the most significant

sources of error is that the jar of Praseo which we used did not contain consistent

samples. While the Praseo that we synthesized last week was mostly green, most of

the Praseo in the jar was black and some was purple, which may have actually been
Violeo. As well, during heating of the Praseo, some of the Praseo did not turn

“Carolina Blue”, as it stuck to the outside of the evaporation dish. The Praseo may

not have cooled sufficiently before being titrated, which could alter the pH of the

solution. We encountered standard error during transfer of products, and human

error significantly contributed to errors in titration, where the titrant (edta) may

have been added in excess because of subpar titration skills.

To rectify these mistakes, more care could be taken during titration and

measurements, and more time should be added between heating a standardized

complex and titrating it, or a specific temperature should be given in the procedure

as being “cool.”

You might also like