The document discusses three key aspects of adequate test design:
1. Content validity - The test must measure what it is intended to measure by addressing the relevant content domain.
2. Response process validity - Ability tests should require test takers to actively solve problems and provide correct answers, demonstrating their ability.
3. Reliability - The test must consistently measure the construct in a stable manner over time and across items through internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
The document also discusses issues with mixed model emotional intelligence scales that incorporate non-ability attributes and rely on self-judgment questions rather than ability items. This leads to measures that are difficult to evaluate empirically and do not correlate well with ability assessments
The document discusses three key aspects of adequate test design:
1. Content validity - The test must measure what it is intended to measure by addressing the relevant content domain.
2. Response process validity - Ability tests should require test takers to actively solve problems and provide correct answers, demonstrating their ability.
3. Reliability - The test must consistently measure the construct in a stable manner over time and across items through internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
The document also discusses issues with mixed model emotional intelligence scales that incorporate non-ability attributes and rely on self-judgment questions rather than ability items. This leads to measures that are difficult to evaluate empirically and do not correlate well with ability assessments
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses three key aspects of adequate test design:
1. Content validity - The test must measure what it is intended to measure by addressing the relevant content domain.
2. Response process validity - Ability tests should require test takers to actively solve problems and provide correct answers, demonstrating their ability.
3. Reliability - The test must consistently measure the construct in a stable manner over time and across items through internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
The document also discusses issues with mixed model emotional intelligence scales that incorporate non-ability attributes and rely on self-judgment questions rather than ability items. This leads to measures that are difficult to evaluate empirically and do not correlate well with ability assessments
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
the term “adequate test design” to referto evidence of
appropriate test content, evidence that test takers employ proper response processes to answer a question, and evidenceof acceptable test reliability. 1-Content evidence of validity Evidence for a test’s validity includes the extent to which a test’s content addresses what should be measured 2 - Response-process evidence of validity. The standard practice in measuring mental abilities is to ask people to solve problems and then compare their answers to a criterion of correctness. Such ability testing elicits a response process in which a person demonstrates an ability by actively solving the problem and then recording a correct answer. 3- Reliability of emotional intelligence measures. Reliability refers to the consistency with which a test measures; without consistency, measurement is compromised. --One way to assess reliability is through a scale’s internal consistency—that is, whether a participant’s responses are consistent across items. --A second sort of reliability—test-retest reliability— concerns consistency across time.
Measuarement issues regarding mixed – model scales
+Conceptual Issues: – Mixed model scales those that mix in attributes from outside EI ,have their own specific measurement characterictis and conern – Mixed Model all are operationalized with self- judgment scales rather than ability items. + indicative findings – The Mixed model`s self – judgment question,combined with their diverse content -> leads to measure that are difficult to access emperically and doesn`t predict ability assesment of EI well