The document discusses social interactionism and how it views language development. Social interactionism stresses that language is learned through interactions with others in social environments rather than being innate. It emphasizes pragmatics over grammar. Two key figures discussed are Lev Vygotsky, who saw language developing through interactions with people using signs and symbols, and Reuven Feuerstein, who believed cognitive abilities can develop even in poor social environments. The author discusses applying these theories in their teaching to help students develop their language and cognitive abilities.
The document discusses social interactionism and how it views language development. Social interactionism stresses that language is learned through interactions with others in social environments rather than being innate. It emphasizes pragmatics over grammar. Two key figures discussed are Lev Vygotsky, who saw language developing through interactions with people using signs and symbols, and Reuven Feuerstein, who believed cognitive abilities can develop even in poor social environments. The author discusses applying these theories in their teaching to help students develop their language and cognitive abilities.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses social interactionism and how it views language development. Social interactionism stresses that language is learned through interactions with others in social environments rather than being innate. It emphasizes pragmatics over grammar. Two key figures discussed are Lev Vygotsky, who saw language developing through interactions with people using signs and symbols, and Reuven Feuerstein, who believed cognitive abilities can develop even in poor social environments. The author discusses applying these theories in their teaching to help students develop their language and cognitive abilities.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
We talked about social interactionism that week.What ı learnt from social
interactionism is that it stresses the enviroment and the context in which the language is being learned.It gives importance to pragmatics of language rather than grammar.
Accordıng to social interactionist;language is not an innate ability,children
born into a social word,and learning occurs through interactions with other people.In other saying,language develops in interacting your enviroment and through these interactions we make our own senses of the world.There are two defender of it,Lev Vygotsky and Reuven Feuerstein.
Vygotsky emphasized the importance of language in interacting with
people,not just speech,but signs and symbols as well.What ı have about Reuven Feuerstein is that he has a theory called "structural cognitive modifiability" in which he emphazise that a person can develop his/her cognitive capacity under suitable circumstances even he/she seems to lack of some skills and ability because of bad social enviroment conditions.
I will benefit from all of these theories through my teaching life.First of
all,thanks to these theories ı understand the importance of my responsibilities in 21st century.Using Vygotsky's bolistic approach,ı will present the lesson in a unity.Also taking into consideration his mediation theory ı will behave like a mediator and try to shape my students' language skills effectively.And based on his "zone of proximal" theory,ı will try to create an reasonable atmosphere to learn.After learning "structural cognitive modifiability" of Reuven Feuerstein,ı won't have bias about my students capacity because ı know that a negative social enviroment can affect the students capacity negatively but this does not mean that this capacity can't develop under any circumstances.Just the opposite ı can help my students about developing their abilities and capacities by creating a suitable atmosphere.If ı couldnt do this,ı would need change my way of teaching.
As a conclusion,each person is unique and their feelings are
important.Forcing them to speak or learn,ı cant be succesful.Instead ı will tell them that language cannot be limited to classroom and they need to use it their daily life willingly.