Lessons in aerodynamics: aviation, EU emissions trading and Chinese opposition | chinadialogue 6/1/11 11:20 PM

中国与世界，环
环境危机大家谈
谈 WHERE CHINA AND THE WORLD DISCUSS THE ENVIRONMENT

Lessons in aerodynamics
Luo Rui

May 17, 2011

Europe’s move to extend its emissions-trading scheme to the air-travel industry has met with
opposition in China, writes Luo Rui. But airlines must still prepare for a carbon-constrained
world.

Related articles
The future of
carbon trading “Aviation
May 28, 2009 emissions are
China may cap- expected to reach
and-trade before 800 million tonnes
US annually by 2020,
In Europe, big changes are brewing for the air-
travel industry. From 2012, carbon emissions September 06, and to account for
2010 between 2.5%
from aviation – including those from non-EU
Under a cloud and 10% of total
airlines taking off or landing within the EU –
will be included within the scope of the December 08, emissions by
2009 2050.”
European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme
(ETS).

The news has not been greeted with universal cheer. In mid-March,
the China Air Transport Association (CATA) issued a statement on behalf of Chinese airlines
opposing this unilateral move. Then, during a session at the UN-led climate-change
negotiations in Bangkok in April, China and other developing nations said that the European
Union should find ways to achieve its 2020 emissions targets by itself, arguing that emission
reductions in international aviation were a matter for multilateral negotiations.

Meanwhile, Chinese aviation has seen developments of its own. In mid-April, the General
Administration of Civil Aviation of China (CAAC) issued new environmental guidelines for the
domestic civil aviation sector, including an emissions-intensity reduction target of 22% by
2020.

Air travel is responsible for some 700 million tonnes of carbon emissions each year (around
half of which comes from international aviation), representing 2.4% of the world’s total
emissions. Emissions from airlines have been growing faster than any other sector, seeing a
98% rise between 1990 and 2006. They are expected to reach 800 million tonnes annually by
2020, and to account for between 2.5% and 10% of total emissions by 2050.

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change includes restrictions on

http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4295-Lessons-in-aerodynamics Page 1 of 4
Lessons in aerodynamics: aviation, EU emissions trading and Chinese opposition | chinadialogue 6/1/11 11:20 PM

emissions from air travel. However, since international aviation involves so many countries, the
categorisation of emissions has been difficult and so far discussions have remained at the
technical level. The Kyoto Protocol does not limit international aviation emissions of Annex 1
industrialised nations, and neither the 2009 Copenhagen Accord nor the 2010 Cancún text
contain a breakthrough in this area.

The main disagreement over allocation of aviation emission cuts between developing and
developed nations remains centred around “common but differentiated responsibilities” – the
UNFCCC principle that rich nations bear a heavier burden than poor nations in the fight against
climate change. This is one of CATA’s reasons for opposing the move to extend the EU’s
emissions trading scheme to cover aviation emissions, as well as its stance that the European
Union has breached the principles of fairness and justice set out in the 1944 Chicago
Convention on International Civil Aviation.

There are also financial concerns in the climate adaptation discussion regarding the aviation
sector. The Green Climate Fund established at Cancún aims to raise US$100 billon (650 billion
yuan) from the private sector by 2020 in order to help developing nations deal with climate
change – and international aviation is considered a potential source of cash. Fundraising
methods could include fuel or passenger tariffs, but these are controversial for several reasons:
they do not directly encourage the industry to cut emissions; it would currently be difficult to
ensure these methods satisfy the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities”; and
developing nations and industry associations worry about the impact on tourism.

Besides the UNFCCC, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is the main promoter
of emission cuts by the aviation industry. The second article of the Kyoto Protocol says that
developing nations need to work with the ICAO to limit or reduce emissions from international
aviation. At the 37th session of the ICAO, in October 2010, all member nations committed to a
framework for emission targets: a 2% global annual average fuel-efficiency improvement to
2020 (and an aspirational target of a 2% annual improvement from 2020 to 2050); achieving
carbon neutrality for the aviation industry by 2020; and producing international standards for
aeroplane engine emissions by 2013.

But these are general goals, with no specific restrictions or binding requirements for individual
member nations, and the practicalities of achieving them (including carbon-trading
mechanisms) will not be discussed until the ICAO’s 38th session in 2013. It is clear that it will
take some time for this body to turn commitments into action.

The European Union is leading the way in implementing aviation emissions cuts, and hopes to
use regional reductions to promote wider cuts by the global air-travel industry. But the
inclusion of international aviation emissions in the EU’s carbon trading scheme has been
opposed by countries with developed aviation sectors outside of Europe. In late 2009, the
United States’ air-transport sector took the British government to court over its inclusion in the
scheme (the airlines involved were being administered in the United Kingdom under the ETS,
hence the location of the hearing).

The EU directive on the inclusion of aviation emissions in the ETS makes it clear that Europe
wants to maintain communication and negotiation on the issue with non-EU nations: article 17
of the directive points out that other governments can adopt “equivalent measures”, which can
also interact with Europe’s trading scheme. The EU also hopes to promote the development of
carbon-trading systems in other nations, and to link these with the ETS.

But most of the rest of the world is already pressing ahead with its own emissions-trading
systems, and linking them all up will be time-consuming. If aviation is brought into the EU ETS
in early 2012 as scheduled, we can expect that, in the run up, EU and non-EU nations will

http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4295-Lessons-in-aerodynamics Page 2 of 4
Lessons in aerodynamics: aviation, EU emissions trading and Chinese opposition | chinadialogue 6/1/11 11:20 PM

become absorbed in negotiations over “equivalent measures”.

Inter-governmental negotiations and court cases around the ETS are ongoing, and it is not yet
clear whether or not there will be amendments to the policy. But one thing is certain: the
aviation industry must learn to exist in a carbon-constrained world. Air travel is a highly
competitive and capital-intensive sector, and any changes to markets or policy can have a
strong impact. What factors does the industry need to take into account if it is to continue to
grow in such an environment?

First and foremost is the cost of carbon. ICF International estimates that between 2010 and
2013 the EU ETS will cost airlines an extra €1.3 billion to €2 billion, growing to €6.5 billion and
€13 billion by 2020. Credit-rating agency Standard & Poor’s meanwhile predicts additional
costs of €1.125 billion between 2012 and 2013 (at €15 per tonne of carbon dioxide). Under an
emissions-trading scheme, the aviation industry will be a net buyer of permits, and if the price
of carbon increases, so will its costs. Carbon restrictions will inevitably present challenges for
airline operations, in terms of fuel costs, aircraft leasing and depreciation expenses. Whether
or not they will also provide potential opportunities and benefits to an airline will depend on
how it optimises its carbon assets and turns those costs into a competitive advantage.

Second, how can airlines cut emissions? Aviation emissions are closely connected with fuel
combustion and aircraft routing. The industry is highly sensitive to changes in the cost of
aviation fuel, and therefore reducing fuel costs by increasing efficiency is a major objective for
all airlines. The industry expects passenger numbers to continue to rise – and therefore only
increased fuel efficiency can reduce the emissions incurred by increased capacity. Airlines and
aeroplane manufacturers need to use all available methods to increase fuel efficiency: reducing
airframe weight, improving aerodynamics, upgrading engines and so on.

New routes and more flights on existing routes will also increase emissions, and airlines need
to consider the composition of their fleet in light of the routes they will fly in the short, mid
and long-term. But the industry is unlikely to reduce the number of miles it flies in order to cut
emissions. Hence, overall strategic planning is required– this includes planning the composition
of aircraft fleets, looking for technical advances in airframes and engines, improving
operational measures and, ultimately, sourcing clean fuels.

Third, non-EU airlines can consider using supplementary methods to participate in domestic
carbon markets. The “equivalent measures” that the European Union is encouraging other
governments to take may be an opportunity for developing nations to explore carbon markets
for domestic industries. For example, in the CAAC’s recent guidance on emissions cuts in the
domestic civil aviation sector, it was proposed that appropriate market mechanisms be used to
achieve emission cuts. In the short term, the aviation industry can start by encouraging
voluntary carbon-neutrality through corporate and individual carbon offsetting. This will
gradually increase the airlines’ engagement with the carbon market, as well as boosting the
demand for such a market and assisting its development in China.

Fourth, as well as carbon dioxide (70%), the aviation industry also emits water vapour (29%),
nitrous oxides, carbon monoxide, sulphur oxides and particulates. The environmental impact
and climate change effect of these other emissions cannot be ignored. In light of medium and
long-term environmental regulation, the aviation industry must urgently consider its overall
pollution strategy.

The emissions- debate within the air-travel sector is only going to get hotter. In a carbon-
constrained era, participating in negotiations and pursuing litigation will not be enough – more
important will be the adjustment of growth strategies in order to maximise competitive
advantage.

http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4295-Lessons-in-aerodynamics Page 3 of 4
Lessons in aerodynamics: aviation, EU emissions trading and Chinese opposition | chinadialogue 6/1/11 11:20 PM

China’s recent behaviour in this field demonstrates the pragmatic approach it is taking: putting
forward fundamental principles for negotiations on international emission cuts and promoting
multilateral talks; while establishing China’s autonomous emission-reduction policy for the
domestic aviation sector, preparing the necessary management and institutional structure,
technologies and market mechanisms, and using staggered industry emission cuts to keep in
step with the country’s wider carbon targets. This is a positive signal – we now look forward to
further progress from the aviation industry.

Luo Rui is a senior consultant at ICF International.

Homepage image from dayou

http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4295-Lessons-in-aerodynamics

除非其他申明,本网站及其内容受知识共享组织的“署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎"2.0
英国：英格兰和威尔士协议和 2.5 中国大陆协议的保护。
Unless otherwise stated, this work is under Creative Commons' Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2.0 England & Wales License and 2.5 China License.

http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4295-Lessons-in-aerodynamics Page 4 of 4