Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pavement Repairment
Pavement Repairment
Pavement Evaluation
PAVEMENT EVALUATION REPORT Interchange 23 to 24 Reconstruction and Widening D213002 New York State Thruway Authority Albany County, New York August 2004
I.
BACKGROUND
This project involves Preliminary Design (Phases I-IV) for the reconstruction and addition of a travel lane in each direction on the NYS Thruway mainline from Interchange 23 (MP 141.92) to Interchange 24 (MP 148.15) in the City of Albany and Town of Guilderland, Albany County, New York. It is anticipated that the lane addition including a full shoulder will occur in the median of the Thruway mainline. Alternatives will be investigated to develop the additional lane as a special use lane (such as an HOV lane) requiring physical separation from the existing travel lanes. This report addresses the pavement conditions and treatment selection for the project. The project is approximately 9.8 km in length with two travel lanes provided in each direction. The portion of the Thruway within the project limits is classified as an urban Principal Arterial Interstate and is part of the National Highway System (NHS). The Thruway passes through the Capital District linking New York City, in the south, to Buffalo, in the west. Interchange 24 provides a connection to the Northway and I-90 which link the Thruway to points north and east of the Capital District. The primary land use adjacent to the project limits is commercial north of Schoolhouse Road and residential south of Schoolhouse Road. The portion of the Thruway within the project limits was constructed in 1954 by the Thruway Authority. The original pavement consists of 9 inches of Reinforced Portland Cement Concrete (RPCC) over 14 inches of gravel base. The original pavement structure was designed for a service life of 35 years. There have been five maintenance overlays since the original construction in 1976, 1983, 1991, 1994, 1997, and 2000 to maintain the integrity of the wearing surface and to provide a smooth and comfortable ride to the traveling public. The first three overlays, in 1976, 1983 and 1991, consisted of a 2 inch to 3 inch asphalt overlay placed over the RPCC and previous overlay, respectively. The asphalt pavement was milled prior to placement of a 1.5 inch asphalt overlay in 1994, 1997, and 2000. In addition to the milling and asphalt overlay operations, the Thruway maintenance forces perform full depth repair work for isolated areas of cracking, faulting, and spalling each year. In 2001, approximately 30 full depth repairs were made, increasing to over 40 in 2002, about 50 in 2003, and over 50 in 2004.
II.
Pavement cores and soil borings (B-1 through B-8) were collected at eight locations between Interchanges 23 and 24. Borings B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-4 were taken at Mile Posts 142, 143, 146, and 147, respectively, through the right travel lane in the northbound direction. Borings B-5, B-6, B-7, and B-8 were taken at Mile Posts 142, 143, 146, and 147.25, respectively through the right travel lane in the southbound direction. The soil borings extended to depths ranging from 2.13 to 2.23 meters below the ground surface. The soil boring logs are included as Appendix A of this report. The data was used to develop and recommend pavement rehabilitation strategies for the proposed project. The pavement cores were obtained with a 102 mm diameter portable core drill. The soil borings were advanced below the pavement open hole with a truck mounted drill rig using a split spoon sampler. The split spoon samples were advanced by a 64 () kg hammer free falling 760 () mm. Blow counts are recorded on the boring logs, and indicate the penetration resistance for a 150 mm advancement of the spoon. Initially, the spoon is driven 150 mm to seat the sampler in undisturbed material. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the next 300 mm is taken as the standard penetration resistance or N value. This value is indicative of the soils inplace compactness or consistency. The final 150 mm increment that the spoon is driven is not included in the determination of N. Refusal is defined as a resistance of greater than 50 blows per 150 mm of penetration.
The pavement cores indicate that the existing pavement structure generally consists of a Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) pavement over Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement. The existing pavement structure generally consists of 198 mm to 229 mm of PCC pavement, with 61 mm to 195 mm of asphalt wearing courses. The following table summarizes the pavement structure at each of the pavement cores taken along the Thruway: Boring No. B-1 Northbound B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 Southbound B-6 B-7 B-8 Asphalt Pavement Thickness 61 mm 91 mm 110 mm 195 mm 107 mm 76 mm 67 mm 107 mm Concrete Pavement Thickness 229 mm 198 mm 219 mm 210 mm 213 mm 198 mm 216 mm 229 mm Total Pavement Thickness 290 mm 289 mm 329 mm 405 mm 320 mm 274 mm 283 mm 336 mm
Segment
According to Correlations of Soil Properties (Bentley, S.P., Carter, M. (1991) Figure 7.5, p. 103), typical CBR design values for soils similar to those encountered during the preliminary soil investigation range from 15 to 40. Based on soils information collected during this investigation, a CBR value of 15 was selected for the pavement design. A soil resilient modulus (Mr) of 34 MPA for the subgrade soil has been selected for pavement design. According to the American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Design Guide and preliminary studies conducted by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), these values range from 28 to 62 MPA with the low value representing clay soil and the high value representing gravel soils.
III.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Due to a recent overlay within the project limits, the surficial pavement distresses could not be accurately determined by field observations along the Thruway. The following historical data was used to evaluate this corridor: Contract Work History Reports from NYSTA Infrastructure and Inspection Inventory (IIIs) Pavement Contract Reports from NYSTA Infrastructure and Inspection Inventory (IIIs) New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) Windshield Survey (1983 through 2003) Automated Pavement Condition Survey (APCS) for years 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. Data collected includes the International Roughness Index (IRI) and rutting values (refer to the Glossary). 1997 and 2000 NYSDOT Highway Sufficiency Ratings Manuals 2002 NYSDOT Traffic Volumes Report The pavement data shows the following: The IRI values are increasing (78.05 in/mile in 2001 to 93.20 in/mile in 2002 NB; 84.36 in/mile in 2001 to 102.08 in/mile in 2002 SB) indicating that the pavement wearing surface is becoming more irregular over time since the last asphalt overlay in 2000. The NB value for 2002 is near the upper limit for good and the respective SB value is
classified as fair according to the FHWA. The IRI values appear to increase rapidly subsequent to asphalt overlay operations. The Rut depth measurements are increasing, but on average are within the Level 1 Severity (<0.24 in) rating. Thruway maintenance forces have completed full depth repairs with increasing frequency including repairs done within this segment in 2002 and scheduled for 2004. Based on the data, the wearing surface exhibits a high rate of deterioration as evidenced by the five maintenance overlays, three in the last ten years, which have been completed since its original construction in 1954. The next mill and inlay is scheduled in 2004. Pavement data shows that the IRI and Rutting values are high (both NB & SB) even though the pavement received a 1.5 inch asphalt overlay in 2000. The average Pavement Surface Condition Classification Survey (PSCCS) scores are decreasing (8.42 in 2000 to 8.10 in 2001 northbound; 8.66 in 2000 to 7.49 in 2001 southbound) indicating that surface cracks are becoming more evident over time since the last asphalt overlay in 2000. The accelerated deterioration of the pavement within this segment indicates that the underlying PCC pavement may be structurally deficient. Contributing factors for the deterioration could include poor subgrade soils, high traffic volumes, poor subsurface drainage, and the age of the pavement structure. The traffic growth, including trucks, on the four lane section also aggravates the deterioration. The structural integrity of the underlying PCC pavement will continue to deteriorate, and subsequently will result in the need for more frequent asphalt overlays to maintain a quality-riding surface for Thruway patrons.
IV.
DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
The existing storm drainage system along the Thruway consists of an open drainage system that conveys water through ditches to natural drainage channels and tributaries. The open drainage system consists of shallow ditches which are generally 0.5 to 1.0 m in depth. In some areas underdrain is located beneath the pavement subbase. The following concerns with the existing drainage system have been identified: Cross culverts and mall drainage outlets are separated and eroded at five locations near MP 143.00, Sink holes in mall at MP 144.00 and MP 145.00, Closed drainage system in mall in poor condition, and Erosion of the side slope caused by runoff from Western Avenue at MP 146.85.
V.
ALTERNATIVE SELECTION
The accelerated deterioration of the pavement indicates that the underlying PCC pavement may be structurally deficient. Pavement treatments which do not include repairs to the underlying PCC and pavement joints, and which do not include the installation of underdrain have been dismissed as non-feasible since they will not address the underlying PCC pavement deterioration on the Thruway. The feasible alternatives were designed using ESAL-based design procedures given in the NYSDOT Comprehensive Pavement Design Manual (06/00). ESAL calculation worksheets and pavement thickness selection tables for Hot-Mix Asphalt and Portland Cement Concrete pavements are located in Appendix B. A. The following pavement treatments were considered for the proposed project and subsequently dismissed as non-feasible.
1. Do Nothing The pavement will continue to deteriorate and will require an increased maintenance effort. 2. Hot Mix Asphalt Resurfacing This alternative does not address the deterioration of the underlying PCC pavement and does not improve subsurface drainage within the project area. 3. Crack & Seat with Asphalt Resurfacing This alternative requires subsurface soils which contain only trace amounts of fines. Soil borings B-1, B-2, B-5, and B-6 exhibit significant amounts of fines. The soil samples, along with a review of available surficial soil maps, indicate that up to 1/3 of the soils within the project area may contain fines. The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) has also indicated that reflective cracking in the asphalt overlay can be a problem with crack & seat treatments. This alternative also requires full-depth pavement reconstruction at five bridges between Interchanges 23 and 24 in order to provide adequate vertical clearance over the Thruway. This reconstruction would include up to 520 m of pavement per bridge. 4. Rubblize and Overlay with Asphalt Concrete Pavement This alternative requires subsurface soils which contain only small amounts of clay. Clays in the subgrade and/or a high water table can lead to liquefaction during rubblization. Soil borings B-5 and B-6 exhibit clayey silt below the subbase. A review of surficial soil maps indicates that approximately 1/3 of the soils within the project area may contain similar soil types and subsequently provide poor subsurface conditions for this treatment option. In addition, similar to the Crack & Seat alternative, this alternative would require full-depth reconstruction beneath five bridges to provide adequate vertical clearance over the Thruway. B. The following rehabilitation strategies are considered feasible for the proposed project. 1. Full-Depth Asphalt Concrete Pavement Reconstruction This strategy involves the following treatment: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Excavation and disposal of existing pavement (750 mm) and widening Subbase course (300 mm) Permeable base course (100 mm) Asphalt concrete base course (125 mm) Asphalt concrete binder course (75 mm) Asphalt concrete top course (50 mm)
2. Full-Depth Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Reconstruction This strategy involves the following treatment: 1. 2. 3. 4. Excavation and disposal of existing pavement (750 mm) and widening Subbase course (300 mm) Permeable base course (100 mm) Portland cement concrete pavement (325 mm)
3. Full-Depth Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Reconstruction with Full-Depth Asphalt Concrete Shoulder Reconstruction- This strategy involves the following treatment: 1. Excavation and disposal of existing pavement (750 mm) and widening 2. Subbase course (300 mm) 3. Permeable base course (100 mm)
Travel Lanes: 4. Portland cement concrete pavement (325 mm) Shoulders: 5. Asphalt concrete base course (125 mm) 6. Asphalt concrete binder course (75 mm) 7. Asphalt concrete top course (50 mm) 4. Full-Depth Pre-Cast Concrete Pavement Reconstruction This strategy involves the following treatment: 1. Excavation and disposal of existing pavement (750 mm) and widening 2. Subbase course (300 mm) 3. Pre-cast portland cement concrete pavement (250 mm)
VI.
A Life-Cycle Cost Analysis was conducted to evaluate the four feasible pavement rehabilitation strategies presented in Section V. Figures I, II, III, and IV (in Appendices C, D, E, and F, respectively) illustrate the anticipated initial treatment costs and expected future maintenance requirements for each rehabilitation strategy. The future maintenance requirements were based on recommendations in the NYSDOT Comprehensive Pavement Design Manual (06/00). For the purpose of this evaluation, a 50 year service life was used to compare life-cycle costs. Hot Mix Asphalt pavement is expected to have a service life of 15 years with full-width transverse crack sealing at 5 year intervals. After 15 years, the pavement will require a 115 mm two course asphalt overlay. Prior to this overlay, the previous top course must be milled. The two course overlay is also expected to have a 15 year service life with full-width transverse crack sealing at 5 year intervals and other cracks filled at 2 year intervals. After 30 years, the pavement will require a 50 mm single course asphalt overlay. Prior to this overlay the previous overlay must be milled. This overlay will have a service life of 8 years and require the same treatments as the previous overlay. Additional mill and 50 mm single course overlays will be needed after 38 and 46 years and will require full-width transverse crack sealing at 5 year intervals with other cracks filled at 2 years intervals. This alternative includes asphalt shoulders, which are also expected to have a service life of 15 years. After 15 years, it is assumed that the shoulders will receive asphalt overlays and crack filling and sealing treatments at the same time as the travel lanes. Portland Cement Concrete pavement is expected to have a service life of 50 years with joint resealing at 8 year intervals. After 20 years, the pavement will require Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR). The first CPR treatment is expected to have a service life of 15 years, but the actual CPR treatment service life is dependent on future traffic volumes. Based on the existing volumes and projected traffic growth, it is anticipated that CPR treatments will be required in year 20, 35, and 45. This alternative also uses concrete shoulders. The shoulder treatments would include the same treatments as the travel lanes in this alternative. The Portland Cement Concrete pavement with asphalt shoulders alternative would have the same pavement treatments on the travel lanes as the Portland Cement Concrete pavement previously described. The shoulder treatments required would be the same as those for the hot mix asphalt pavement previously described. Pre-cast Portland Cement Concrete Slabs are expected to have a service life of 50+ years with joint sealing at 8 year intervals. Asphalt shoulders would be used with this treatment. The shoulder treatments required are the same as those for the hot mix asphalt pavement previously described.
The Life Cycle Cost Analysis indicates that, when considering the initial costs and the theoretical future maintenance costs over a 50-year service life, the Full-Depth Reconstruction with Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) option is a more economical treatment strategy than the Full-Depth Reconstruction with Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Asphalt Shoulders, the Full-Depth Reconstruction with PCC and PCC shoulders, and Full-Depth Reconstruction with Pre-Cast Concrete Slabs options. The Full-Depth Reconstruction with Asphalt Shoulders alternative is slightly more expensive in terms of construction. However, the cost estimates do not include user costs from delay that will be incurred during maintenance operations which are required more frequently for asphalt pavements. Detailed cost estimates for the treatment strategies considered are included in Appendices C, D, E and F. The following table summarizes the life-cycle costs for each treatment strategy:
Pavement Treatment Full-Depth Asphalt Concrete Full-Depth Portland Cement Concrete w/Concrete Shoulders Full-Depth Portland Cement Concrete w/Asphalt Shoulders Full-depth Pre-cast Concrete
$ 41,409,539 $ 73,798,142
$ 21,235,349 $ 13,153,902
$ 46,978,565 $ 77,476,173
VII.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the pavement evaluation and analysis, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, and maintenance schedule the recommended pavement treatment strategy for the Thruway mainline between Interchange 23 and Interchange 24 is the Full-Depth Portland Cement Concrete with Asphalt Shoulders Reconstruction option. Although this alternative does not have the lowest life-cycle cost, the Portland Cement Concrete pavement requires less overall maintenance compared to asphalt pavement, and would result in less disruption to traffic on the Thruway. For this treatment strategy to achieve the desired service life, it is further recommended that future maintenance needs described in the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis be scheduled as shown, unless otherwise adjusted as a result of future observations and/or performance.
Appendix A
Soil Boring Logs
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 10-28-03 10:25:00 AM C. Symmes 10-28-03 AM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 10:55:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
ASPHALT, (61 mm) CONCRETE, wire fabric (229 mm) 0.29 0.29
NA
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid.
f.m.c. SAND, little silt, little f.c. gravel, brown, v. compact, moist (625 mm) (SUBBASE)
21-24-27-33
51
No Recovery
S-2 0.61 0
37-16-16-18
32
15-18-19-26
37
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 10-28-03 11:05:00 AM C. Symmes 10-28-03 AM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 11:40:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid.
f.m.c. SAND, Some f.c. Gravel, little silt, brown, medium compact, moist (320 mm) (SUBBASE)
14-16-11-12
27
12-16-18-15
34
becomes moist
14-15-17-18
32
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 11-4-03 10:00:00 AM C. Symmes 11-4-03 AM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 10:35:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid.
f.m.c. SAND, Some f.c. Gravel, little silt, trace wood, brown/gray, medium compact, moist (219 mm) (SUBBASE) f. SAND, trace silt, light brown, medium compact, moist (SP)
15-6-15-23
21
24-24-19-20
43
14-12-10-10
22
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 11-4-03 10:50:00 AM C. Symmes 11-4-03 AM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 11:25:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
0.41 0.41
NA
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid.
f.m.c. SAND, Some f.c. Gravel, little silt, brown/gray, very compact, moist (143 mm) (SUBBASE) f. SAND, trace silt, brown, very compact, moist (FILL) S-1 0.61 0.34
26-55-41-47
96
27-35-37-29
72
5-18-13-13
31
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 11-3-03 12:15:00 PM J. Gorman 11-3-03 PM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 12:45:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid.
f.m.c. SAND, little f.c gravel, little silt, brown, compact, moist (625 mm) (SUBBASE)
16-18-21-11
39
11-13-13-17
26
No Recovery
S-3 0.61 0
13-12-17-19
29
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 11-3-03 11:40:00 AM C. Symmes 11-3-03 PM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 12:00:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid.
f.m.c. SAND, little silt, little f.c. gravel, brown, compact, moist (488 mm) (SUBBASE)
16-19-17-14
36
f.m. SAND, Some Silt, brown, compact, moist (FILL) Similar Soil (FILL)
10-14-14-15
28
9-9-12-12
21
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 10-30-03 11:15:00 AM C. Symmes 10-30-03 AM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 11:50:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
0.28 0.28
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid. Gravel wedged in shoe, S-1
f.c. GRAVEL, Some f.m.c. Sand, trace silt, brown, very compact, wet (631 mm) (SUBBASE)
14-25-36-38
61
14-14-16-17
30
7-8-7-9
15
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
12714.1003.1502
Page 1 of 1
Open Hole
New York State Thruway Authority D. Drew 10-30-03 10:00:00 AM C. Symmes 10-30-03 AM
CONTRACTOR: DRILLER:
FINISH TIME: 10:50:00 CHECKED BY: GRAPHICS "N" Value or RQD% SAMPLE DEPTH (Meters)
W. Harris
ELEVATION (Meters) Remarks on Character of Drilling, Water Return, etc. WATER LEVELS AND/OR WELL DATA
SAMP./CORE NUMBER SAMP. ADV. (m) LEN. CORE (m) RECOVERY (m)
f.m.c. SAND, little silt, little f.c. gravel, dark brown, very compact, wet (183 mm) (SUBBASE) f. SAND, trace silt, light brown, very compact, moist (SP)
102 mm Dia. Portable Core Drill used to core pavement with water as cooling fluid. Cored through an expansion joint in PCC pavement
22-45-33-33
78
18-24-21-20
45
14-18-18-17
36
2
SUBSURFACE LOG 12714.GPJ CHA.GDT 1/20/06
Appendix B
ESAL Calculations Pavement Thickness Selection Tables
Completed By: LMK Checked By: Project Name: Interchange 23-24 Reconstruction Project Location: NYSTA - Albany Corridor
CHA Project No: 11593 1005 1310 Sheet: of Date: 10/21/2003 Subject: HMA ESAL Calculations
1.456811173 1.099398584 66430.58947 56015.29473 1.484188089 1.417094044 28008 5321 7540.999 38,534,507 vehicles vehicles ESALs ESALs vehicles vehicles
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\simple_ESAL
1/20/2006
Completed By: LMK Checked By: Project Name: Interchange 23-24 Reconstruction Project Location: NYSTA - Albany Corridor
CHA Project No: 11593 1005 1310 Sheet: of Date: 5/3/2004 Subject: HMA ESAL Calculations
2.638811793 1.276841607 130937.8412 90278.92059 1.723736169 1.536868085 45139 8576 13180.945 168,386,575 vehicles vehicles ESALs ESALs vehicles vehicles
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\simple_ESAL
1/20/2006
Completed By: LMK Checked By: Project Name: Interchange 23-24 Reconstruction Project Location: NYSTA - Albany Corridor
CHA Project No: 11593 1005 1310 Sheet: of Date: 5/3/2004 Subject: PCC ESAL Calculations
2.638811793 1.276841607 130937.8412 90278.92059 2.362156973 2.106078486 45139 8576 18062.777 230,751,973 vehicles vehicles ESALs ESALs vehicles vehicles
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\simple_ESAL
1/20/2006
Appendix C
Engineers Cost Estimate Full-Depth Hot Mix Asphalt
FIGURE I LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS RECONSTRUCT WITH FULL DEPTH HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA)
ITEM NO. Present Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 57,561,688 $ 36,082,265 90,794 90,794 8,840,723 167,627 167,627 272,382 167,627 167,627 167,627 272,382 167,627 167,627 2,448,363 167,627 167,627 272,382 167,627 4,124,080 167,627 167,627 272,382 167,627 2,448,363 167,627 1.0000 0.8219 0.6756 0.5553 0.5134 0.4746 0.4564 0.4388 0.4057 0.3751 0.3751 0.3468 0.3207 0.3083 0.2851 0.2636 0.2534 0.2437 0.2253 0.2083 0.1926 0.1852 0.1780 0.1646 0.1522 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 36,082,265 74,624 61,340 4,909,254 86,060 79,556 124,315 73,555 68,006 62,877 102,171 58,133 53,758 754,830 47,790 44,186 69,022 40,851 929,155 34,917 32,285 50,445 29,838 403,001 25,513 44,297,746 Present Worth RECONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH HMA FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK SEALING FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK SEALING MILL & 115mm HMA OVERLAY (INCLUDES SHOULDERS) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK SEALING (x3) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK SEALING (x3) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS MILL & 50mm HMA OVERLAY (TRAVEL LANES ONLY) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK SEALING (x3) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS MILL & 50mm HMA OVERLAY (INCLUDES SHOULDERS) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK SEALING (x3) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS MILL & 50mm HMA OVERLAY (TRAVEL LANES ONLY) FILL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS SUB-TOTAL = SALVAGE VALUE Mill & 50mm HMA Overlay, 4-year salvage value TOTAL = 0 5 10 15 17 19 20 21 23 25 25 27 29 30 32 34 35 36 38 40 42 43 44 46 48
DESCRIPTION
YEAR (n)
PWF (P/F,4%,n)
18402.7602 18402.7602 18633.07 18633.07 18402.7602 18633.07 18633.07 18633.07 18402.7602 18633.07 18633.07 18633.07 18633.07 18402.7602 18633.07 18633.07 18633.07 18402.7602 18633.07 18633.07
50
(1,224,182) 56,337,507
0.1407
(172,242) 44,125,503
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\COST ESTIMATES
1/20/2006
HMA RECONSTRUCTION ITEM # 203.02 203.20 304.11 402.010901 402.010911 402.377901 402.377911 402.197901 402.197911 402.127201 402.127211 407.01 14646.10 DESCRIPTION UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL SELECT GRANULAR SUBGRADE SUBBASE TYPE 1 ASPHALT TREATED PERMEABLE BASE COURSE PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.010901 SUPERPAVE HMA 37.5mm PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.377901 SUPERPAVE HMA 19.0mm PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.197901 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.127201 TACK COAT MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS (STARS) UNITS CM CM CM MT QU MT QU MT QU MT QU L M QUANTITY 276859 211469 99403 79622 3981 99527 4976 59716 2986 39811 1991 119283 36471 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 20.00 9.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 2.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 5,537,173.02 1,903,217.64 3,479,093.44 2,786,753.85 139,337.69 6,469,250.00 199,053.85 3,881,550.00 119,432.31 2,587,700.00 79,621.54 238,566.41 18,235.27 27,438,985.02
TOTAL ITEM COST OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 5 & 10 YEARS ITEM # 18402.7602 DESCRIPTION CLEANING & SEALING CRACKS IN HMA PAVEMENT USING HOT APPLIED SEALANT UNITS L QUANTITY 34522 $ COST 2.00 $ $ TOTAL 69,044.93 69,044.93
ITEM COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENT OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 32, 34, 36, 40, 42, 44, & 48 YEARS ITEM # 18633.07 DESCRIPTION CLEANING AND FILLING JOINTS AND CRACKS UNITS M QUANTITY 127473 $ COST 1.00 $ TOTAL 127,472.94
127,472.94
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,197.83 5,098.92 9,560.47 15,296.75 40,153.97 167,626.91
Page 1 of 3
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 15 YEARS MILL & TWO COURSE OVERLAY, 115 mm AC . ITEM # 402.127201 402.127211 402.197901 402.197911 407.01 490.10 14646.10 DESCRIPTION SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 19mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.197901 TACK COAT PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS (STARS) UNITS MT QU MT QU L SM M QUANTITY 39811 1991 51754 2588 119283 331342 36471 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 2,587,700.00 79,621.54 3,364,010.00 103,508.00 238,566.41 331,342.23 18,235.27
TOTAL ITEM COST = OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
6,722,983.45
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 30 & 46 YEARS MILL & FILL WITH TWO COURSE OVERLAY, 75 mm AC (NO SHOULDER WORK) ITEM # 402.127201 402.127211 407.01 490.10 DESCRIPTION SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.127201 TACK COAT PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE UNITS MT QU L SM QUANTITY 23773 1189 35615 197860 $ $ $ $ COST 65.00 40.00 2.00 1.00 $ $ $ $ TOTAL 1,545,237.60 47,545.77 71,229.62 197,860.06
TOTAL ITEM COST = OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
1,861,873.05
$ $ $ $ $ $
Page 2 of 3
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 38 YEARS MILL & FILL WITH TWO COURSE OVERLAY, 75 mm AC ITEM # 402.127201 402.127211 407.01 490.10 14646.10 DESCRIPTION SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.127201 TACK COAT PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS (STARS) UNITS MT QU L SM M QUANTITY 39811 1991 59642 331342 36471 $ $ $ $ $ COST 65.00 40.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 2,587,700.00 79,621.54 119,283.20 331,342.23 18,235.27
TOTAL ITEM COST = OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
3,136,182.25
$ $ $ $ $ $
Page 3 of 3
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
276859 CM
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\HMAEstBackup - 203.02
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= SUBGRADE = TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM 331342.233 SM
99403 CM
ITEM 203.20 SELECT GRANULAR SUBGRADE NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537.192 WIDTH = 25.9 DEPTH = 450 VOLUME = 111156 INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 WIDTH = 19.2 DEPTH = 450 VOLUME = 790 NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 19.2 DEPTH = 450 VOLUME = 1382 TOTAL AREA = SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = DEPTH = VOLUME =
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM 469930.282 SM
211469 CM
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\HMAEstBackup - 304.11
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
ITEM 18403.377901 SUPERPAVE HMA 37.5MM AREA = 331342.233 DEPTH = 125 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 41417.7791 TONNAGE= 99526.9232 TOTAL ITEM 18403.377902 =
SM MM CM MT 99527 MT
ITEM 18403.197901 SUPERPAVE HMA 19.0MM AREA = 331342.233 DEPTH = 75 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 24850.6675 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 59716.1539 TOTAL ITEM 18403.197902 =
SM MM CM MT 59716 MT
ITEM 18403.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5MM AREA = 331342.233 DEPTH = 50 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 16567 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 39811 TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 =
SM MM CM MT 39811 MT
ITEM 407.01 TACK COAT TOTAL AREA = 2 APPL FOR TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 407.01 =
ITEM 14646.10 MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAYS DELINEATORS (STARS) TOTAL LENGTH = 36471 M TOTAL ITEM 14646.10 = 36471 M
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\HMAEstBackup - 403.XX-407.01
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION FUTURE TREATMENT: CLEANING & FILLING JOINTS/CRACKS
ITEM 18402.7602 CLEANING AND SEALING CRACKS IN HMA PAVEMENT USING HOT APPLIED SEALANT ASSUME 1 TRANSVERSE CRACK EVERY 6m. NORTHBOUND LENGTH = NO. 6m SECTIONS = TRANSVERSE CRACKS LENGTH/6m = LENGTH = RAMPS LENGTH = NO. 6m SECTIONS = TRANSVERSE CRACKS LENGTH/6m = LENGTH = TOTAL LENGTH = WIDTH = DEPTH = VOLUME = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7602 = SOUTHBOUND 9537 M LENGTH = 1590 SECTIONS NO. 6m SECTION
352 59
34522.4655 L
ITEM 18633.07 CLEANING AND FILLING JOINTS AND CRACKS ASSUME 1 TRANSVERSE CRACK EVERY 6m. NORTHBOUND LENGTH = NO. 6m SECTIONS = TRANSVERSE CRACKS LENGTH/6m = LENGTH = LONGITUDINAL CRACKS LENGTH = RAMPS LENGTH = NO. 6m SECTIONS = TRANSVERSE CRACKS LENGTH/6m = LENGTH = LONGITUDINAL CRACKS LENGTH = TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18633.07 = SOUTHBOUND 9537 M LENGTH = 1590 SECTIONS NO. 6m SECTION
TRANSVERSE CRACKS LENGTH/6m = 18.30 M/SECT LENGTH = 25455 M LONGITUDINAL CRACKS LENGTH = 33384 M
38149 M
352 59
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\HMAEstBackup - 2&5 YR
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = RAMP LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION FUTURE TREATMENT: MILL TOP COURSE W/TWO COURSE OVERLAY, 115mm AC INCLUDES SHOULDERS
ITEM 402.197901 SUPERPAVE HMA 19.0MM AREA = 331342 DEPTH = 65 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 21537 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 51754 TOTAL ITEM 18403.197902 = SM MM CM MT 51754 MT
ITEM 402.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5MM AREA = 331342 DEPTH = 50 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 16567 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 39811 TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 =
SM MM CM MT 39811 MT
ITEM 407.01 TACK COAT TOTAL AREA = 2 APPL FOR TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 407.01 =
ITEM 490.10 PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE ASSUME ONE PASS IS SUFFICIENT TO MILL 50mm TOP COURSE TOTAL AREA 331342 SM
331342 SM
ITEM 14646.10 MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAYS DELINEATORS (STARS) TOTAL LENGTH = 36471 M TOTAL ITEM 14646.10 = 36471 M
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\HMAEstBackup - 15 YR
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = RAMP LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION FUTURE TREATMENT: MILL & INLAY WITH TWO COURSE OVERLAY, 75mm AC INCLUDES SHOULDERS
ITEM 18403.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5MM AREA = 331342 DEPTH = 50 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 16567 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 39811 TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 = SM MM CM MT 39811 MT
ITEM 407.01 TACK COAT TOTAL AREA = 1 APPL FOR TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 407.01 =
ITEM 490.10 PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE ASSUME ONE PASS IS REQ'D TO MILL 50mm TOP TOTAL AREA
331342 SM
331342 SM
ITEM 14646.10 MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAYS DELINEATORS (STARS) TOTAL LENGTH = 36471 M TOTAL ITEM 14646.10 = 36471 M
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\HMAEstBackup - 38 YR
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = RAMP LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION FUTURE TREATMENT: MILL & FILL WITH TWO COURSE OVERLAY, 75mm AC EXCLUDES SHOULDERS
ITEM 18403.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5MM AREA = 197860 DEPTH = 50 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 9893 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 23773 TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 = SM MM CM MT 23773 MT
ITEM 407.01 TACK COAT TOTAL AREA = 1 APPL FOR TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 407.01 =
ITEM 490.10 PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE ASSUME ONE PASS IS REQ'D TO MILL 50mm TOP TOTAL AREA
197860 SM
197860 SM
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\HMAEstBackup - 30,46 YR
1/20/2006
Appendix D
Engineers Cost Estimate Full-Depth Portland Cement Concrete
FIGURE II LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS RECONSTRUCT WITH FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC)
ITEM NO. RECONSTRUCT 300mm PCC SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS SUB-TOTAL = SALVAGE VALUE Concrete Pavement Restoration, 5-year salvage value Seal Joints & Cracks, 6-year salvage value 50 50 $ $ TOTAL = (3,336,925.96) (679,847) 59,226,435 $ 63,243,208 $ 0 8 16 20 33 35 45 49 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 45,126,019 793,154 793,154 3,627,661 793,154 4,643,058 6,673,852 793,154 1.0000 0.7307 0.5339 0.3751 0.2741 0.2003 0.1712 0.1463 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 45,126,019 579,558 423,465 1,360,736 217,404 930,005 1,142,563 116,038 49,895,788
DESCRIPTION
PWF (P/F,4%,n)
0.1407 0.1407
$ $
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\COST ESTIMATES
1/20/2006
PCC RECONSTRUCTION ITEM # 203.02 304.11 502.0001 502.0010 502.91 502.9110 502.92 502.9210 502.93 14646.10 DESCRIPTION UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL SUBBASE TYPE 1 PORTLAND CEMENT TREATED PERMEABLE BASE COURSE PCC PAVEMENT, UNREINFORCED, NONPROFILOGRAPHED, CLASS C CONSTRUCTING TRANSVERSE JOINTS CONSTRUCTING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS FILLING TRANSVERSE CONTRACTION JOINTS SEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS UNITS CM CM CM CM M M M M M M QUANTITY 231,940 99,403 33,124 99,403 55,207 72,237 55,207 55,207 72,237 36,471 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 20.00 35.00 75.00 198.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 4,638,791.26 3,479,093.44 2,484,315.65 19,681,728.62 1,104,138.59 722,369.02 552,069.29 552,069.29 1,083,553.54 18,235.27 34,316,363.98
TOTAL ITEM COST OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 8, 16, 33, AND 49 YEARS JOINT RESEALING ITEM # 18502.702002 DESCRIPTION RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT UNITS M QUANTITY 55,207 $ COST 7.00 $ TOTAL 386,448.51
18502.7401
72,237
3.00
216,710.71
603,159.21
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 48,252.74 24,126.37 45,236.94 72,379.11 189,995.15 793,154.37
Page 1 of 3
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 20 YEARS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR) ITEM # 18502.4120 18502.7001 18502.702002 18502.7401 18502.8201 18502.8301 DESCRIPTION PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE SAWCUTTING METHOD RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6m SLABS, SILICONE SEALANT RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL DIAMOND GRINDING SMOOTHNESS QUALITY ADJUSTMENT UNITS SM EA M M SM QU QUANTITY 10,437 4,172 55,207 72,237 331,342 16,567 $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 50.00 60.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 3.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 521,864.02 250,300.87 386,448.51 216,710.71 1,325,368.93 57,984.89
2,758,677.92
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 220,694.23 110,347.12 206,900.84 331,041.35 868,983.54 3,627,661.46
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 35 YEARS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR) ITEM # 18502.4120 18502.7001 18502.702002 18502.7401 18502.8201 18502.8301 DESCRIPTION PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE SAWCUTTING METHOD RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6m SLABS, SILICONE SEALANT RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL DIAMOND GRINDING SMOOTHNESS QUALITY ADJUSTMENT UNITS SM EA M M SM QU QUANTITY 20,875 8,343 55,207 72,237 331,342 16,567 $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 50.00 60.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 3.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 1,043,728.03 500,601.73 386,448.51 216,710.71 1,325,368.93 57,984.89
3,530,842.80
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 282,467.42 141,233.71 264,813.21 423,701.14 1,112,215.48 4,643,058.28
Page 2 of 3
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 45 YEARS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR) ITEM # 18502.4120 18502.7001 18502.702002 18502.7401 18502.8201 18502.8301 DESCRIPTION PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE SAWCUTTING METHOD RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6m SLABS, SILICONE SEALANT RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL DIAMOND GRINDING SMOOTHNESS QUALITY ADJUSTMENT UNITS SM EA M M SM QU QUANTITY 41,749 16,687 55,207 72,237 331,342 16,567 $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 50.00 60.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 3.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 2,087,456.07 1,001,203.47 386,448.51 216,710.71 1,325,368.93 57,984.89
5,075,172.57
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 406,013.81 203,006.90 380,637.94 609,020.71 1,598,679.36 6,673,851.93
Page 3 of 3
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
MM MM MM MM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
231,940 CM
ITEM 304.11 SUBBASE TYPE II NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537.192 WIDTH = 18.3 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 52359 INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 WIDTH = 11.6 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 318 NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 11.6 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 556 SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = DEPTH = VOLUME =
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
TOTAL ASPHALT AREA = TOTAL CONCRETE AREA = TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 304.11 =
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PCCEstBackup - 203.02-304.11
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = RAMP LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M M
MM MM MM MM
FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION MAINLINE PAVEMENT AND SHOULDERS
ITEM 502.0001 100mm PORTLAND CEMENT TREATED PERMEABLE BASE AREA = DEPTH = TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = TOTAL ITEM 502.0001 = 331242.1 SM 100 MM 33124.2 CM includes under shldr too
33,124 CM
ITEM 502.0010 300mm PCC UNREINFORCED, NONPROFILOGRAPHED TOP AREA = 331342 SM DEPTH = 300 MM TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 99403 CM
99,403 CM
ITEM 502.91 CONSTRUCTING TRANSVERSE JOINTS SLAB LENGT 6M SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = NO. JOINTS = TOTAL LENGTH =
NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537 M WIDTH = 18.3 MM NO. JOINTS 1589.5 JOINTS TOTAL LENG 29080 M INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 WIDTH = 11.6 NO. JOINTS 15.2 TOTAL LENG 176 NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 11.6 NO. JOINTS 26.7 TOTAL LENG 309 TOTAL ITEM 502.91 =
M MM JOINTS M
M MM JOINTS M
M MM JOINTS M 55,207 M
ITEM 502.9110 CONSTRUCTING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537.192 WIDTH = 18.3 NO. JOINTS 4.0 TOTAL LENG 38149 INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 WIDTH = 11.6 NO. JOINTS 2.0 TOTAL LENG 182 NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 11.6 NO. JOINTS 2.0 TOTAL LENG 320 SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = NO. JOINTS = TOTAL LENGTH =
M MM JOINTS M
M MM JOINTS M
M MM JOINTS M
M MM JOINTS M 72,237 M
ITEM 14646.10 MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAYS DELINEATORS (STARS) TOTAL LENGTH = 36471 M TOTAL ITEM 14646.10 = 36471 M
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION PCC PAVEMENT FUTURE TREATMENT: SEALING JOINTS
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 55207 M 55,207 M
FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION PCC TRAVEL LANES W/ HMA SHOULDERS FUTURE TREATMENT: SEALING JOINTS
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 36596 M 36,596 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 72237 M 72,237 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 35766 M 35,766 M
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PCCEstBackup - 8,16,33,49 YR
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH/WIDTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION FUTURE TREATMENT COST: CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR)
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 25) PCC AREA = 331342 SM PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPAIR = 3.15 % TOTAL AREA = 10437 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 10,437 SM
FULL DEPTH PCC RECONSTRUCTION (ASPHALT SHOULDERS) FUTURE TREATMENT COST: CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR)
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 25) PCC AREA = 219577 SM PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPA 3.15 % TOTAL AREA = 6917 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 6,917 SM
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 41) PAVEMENT AREA = 331342 SM 6.3 % PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPAIR = TOTAL AREA = 20875 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 20,875 SM
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 41) PAVEMENT AREA = 219577 SM PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPA 6.3 % TOTAL AREA = 13833 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 13,833 SM
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 25) NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 2981 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 44 EA LONGITUDINAL NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 59 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 22 EA NO. DOWELS = 132434 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 3.15 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 4,172 EA
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 25) NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 2981 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 22 EA NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 59 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 22 EA NO. DOWELS = 66862 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 3.15 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 2,106 EA
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 41) NO. DOWELS = 132434 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 6.30 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 8,343 EA
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 41) NO. DOWELS = 66862 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 6.30 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 4,212 EA
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 55207 M
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 36596 M
55,207 M
36,596 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 72237 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 35766 M
72,237 M
35,766 M
ITEM 18502.8201 FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL PAVEMENT AREA = 331342 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.8201 = 331,342 SM
ITEM 18502.8201 FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL PAVEMENT AREA = 219577 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.8201 = 219,577 SM
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PCCEstBackup - CPR
1/20/2006
Appendix E
Engineers Cost Estimate Full-Depth Portland Cement Concrete with Asphalt Shoulders
FIGURE III LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS RECONSTRUCT WITH FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC) AND ASPHALT SHOULERS
ITEM NO. RECONSTRUCT 300mm PCC SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION MILL & INLAY ASPHALT SHOULDERS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION MILL & INLAY ASPHALT SHOULDERS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS SUB-TOTAL = SALVAGE VALUE Concrete Pavement Restoration, 15-year salvage value Mill & Inlay Asphalt Shoulers, 15-year salvage value Cleaning & Filling Joints, 1-year salvage value Seal Joints & Cracks, 6-year salvage value TOTAL = $ 62,644,888 $ 0 8 16 17 19 20 20 22 24 27 29 31 33 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 45 47 49 49 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 41,409,539 477,967 477,967 359,685 359,685 2,304,423 2,445,410 359,685 359,685 359,685 359,685 359,685 477,967 359,685 2,925,372 359,685 359,685 359,685 359,685 4,167,271 2,445,410 359,685 359,685 477,967 1.0000 0.7307 0.5339 0.5134 0.4746 0.4564 0.4564 0.4220 0.3901 0.3468 0.3207 0.2965 0.2741 0.2741 0.2534 0.2343 0.2166 0.2003 0.1852 0.1712 0.1712 0.1583 0.1463 0.1463 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 41,409,539 349,250 255,186 184,662 170,707 1,051,739 1,116,085 151,787 140,313 124,739 115,351 106,647 131,011 98,590 741,289 84,274 77,908 72,045 66,614 713,437 418,654 56,938 52,622 69,927 47,759,314
DESCRIPTION
PWF (P/F,4%,n)
18502.7401 18502.7401 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18502.7401 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18502.7401
50 50 50 50
$ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\COST ESTIMATES
1/20/2006
PCC RECONSTRUCTION ITEM # 203.02 304.11 402.377901 402.377911 402.197901 402.197911 402.127201 402.127211 407.01 502.0001 502.0010 502.91 502.9110 502.92 502.9210 502.93 14646.10 DESCRIPTION UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL SUBBASE TYPE 1 SUPERPAVE HMA 37.5mm PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.377901 SUPERPAVE HMA 19.0mm PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.197901 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.127201 TACK COAT PORTLAND CEMENT TREATED PERMEABLE BASE COURSE PCC PAVEMENT, UNREINFORCED, NONPROFILOGRAPHED, CLASS C CONSTRUCTING TRANSVERSE JOINTS CONSTRUCTING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS FILLING TRANSVERSE CONTRACTION JOINTS SEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS UNITS CM CM MT QU MT QU MT QU L CM CM M M M M M M QUANTITY 231940 99403 40095 2005 24057 1203 16038 802 48054 33124 65873 36596 35766 36596 36596 35766 36471 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 20.00 35.00 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 2.00 75.00 198.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 4,638,791.26 3,479,093.44 2,606,156.01 80,189.42 1,563,693.61 48,113.65 1,042,462.40 32,075.77 96,107.16 2,484,315.65 13,042,900.44 731,924.20 357,664.51 365,962.10 365,962.10 536,496.77 18,235.27 31,490,143.76
TOTAL ITEM COST OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 8, 16, 33, AND 49 YEARS JOINT RESEALING ITEM # 18502.702002 18502.7401 DESCRIPTION RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE P RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE UNITS M M QUANTITY 36596 35766 $ $ COST 7.00 3.00 $ $ TOTAL 256,173.47 107,299.35
363,472.82
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 29,077.83 14,538.91 27,260.46 43,616.74 114,493.94 477,966.76
Page 1 of 3
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 20 YEARS PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR) ITEM # 18502.4120 18502.7001 18502.702002 18502.7401 18502.8201 18502.8301 DESCRIPTION PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6m SLABS, SILICONE SEALANT RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL DIAMOND GRINDING SMOOTHNESS QUALITY ADJUSTMENT UNITS SM EA M M SM QU QUANTITY 6917 2106 36596 35766 219577 10979 $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 50.00 60.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 3.50 $ $ $ $ $ $
CONCRETE
1,752,413.27
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 140,193.06 70,096.53 131,430.99 210,289.59 552,010.18 2,304,423.44
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 35 YEARS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR) ITEM # 18502.4120 18502.7001 18502.702002 18502.7401 18502.8201 18502.8301 DESCRIPTION PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6m SLABS, SILICONE SEALANT RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL DIAMOND GRINDING SMOOTHNESS QUALITY ADJUSTMENT UNITS SM EA M M SM QU QUANTITY 13833 4212 36596 35766 219577 10979 $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 50.00 60.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 3.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 691,668.96 252,740.23 256,173.47 107,299.35 878,309.79 38,426.05
2,224,617.86
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 177,969.43 88,984.71 166,846.34 266,954.14 700,754.63 2,925,372.49
Page 2 of 3
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 45 YEARS CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR) ITEM # 18502.4120 18502.7001 18502.702002 18502.7401 18502.8201 18502.8301 DESCRIPTION PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6m SLABS, SILICONE SEALANT RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL DIAMOND GRINDING SMOOTHNESS QUALITY ADJUSTMENT UNITS SM EA M M SM QU QUANTITY 27667 8425 36596 35766 219577 10979 $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 50.00 60.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 3.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 1,383,337.93 505,480.45 256,173.47 107,299.35 878,309.79 38,426.05
3,169,027.05
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 253,522.16 126,761.08 237,677.03 380,283.25 998,243.52 4,167,270.57
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 17, 19, 22, 24, 27, 29, 31, 33, 37, 39, 41, 43, 47, AND 49 YEARS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS ITEM # 18633.08 DESCRIPTION CLEANING AND FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS UNITS M QUANTITY 36470 $ COST 7.50 $ TOTAL 273,525.00
TOTAL ITEM COST = OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
273,525.00
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 20 & 45 YEARS MILL & INLAY ASPHALT SHOULDERS ITEM # 402.127201 402.127211 407.01 490.10 14646.10 DESCRIPTION SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.127201 TACK COAT PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS UNITS MT QU L SM M QUANTITY 24057 1203 48053 133482 36471 $ $ $ $ $ COST 65.00 40.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 1,563,689.83 48,113.53 96,106.93 133,481.85 18,235.27
TOTAL ITEM COST = OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
1,859,627.42
$ $ $ $ $ $
Page 3 of 3
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
MM MM MM MM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
231,940 CM
ITEM 304.11 SUBBASE TYPE II NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537.192 WIDTH = 18.3 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 52359 INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 WIDTH = 11.6 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 318 NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 11.6 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 556 SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = DEPTH = VOLUME =
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
TOTAL ASPHALT AREA = TOTAL CONCRETE AREA = TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 304.11 =
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PCCEstBackup - 203.02-304.11
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = RAMP LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M M
PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = 300 PERM. BASE = 100 SUBBASE = 300 TOTAL= 700
MM MM MM MM
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= 0.18 L/SM 2.403 MT/CM
MM MM MM MM MM MM
33,124 CM
ITEM 502.0010 300mm PCC UNREINFORCED, NONPROFILOGRAPHED TOP AREA = 219577 SM DEPTH = 300 MM TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 65873 CM
ITEM 18403.197901 SUPERPAVE HMA 19.0MM AREA = 133482 SM DEPTH = 75 MM TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 10011 CM TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 24057 MT TOTAL ITEM 18403.197902 = 24,057 MT
65,873 CM
ITEM 502.91 CONSTRUCTING TRANSVERSE JOINTS SLAB LENGT 6M SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = NO. JOINTS = TOTAL LENGTH =
NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537 M WIDTH = 12.2 MM NO. JOINTS 1589.5 JOINTS TOTAL LENG 19383 M INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 WIDTH = 4.3 NO. JOINTS 15.2 TOTAL LENG 65 NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 4.3 NO. JOINTS 26.7 TOTAL LENG 114 TOTAL ITEM 502.91 =
ITEM 18403.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5MM AREA = 133482 SM DEPTH = 50 MM TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 6674 CM TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 16038 MT 8346 12.2 1391.0 16962 M MM JOINTS M TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 = 16,038 MT
M MM JOINTS M
ITEM 407.01 TACK COAT TOTAL AREA = 2 APPL FOR TOTAL AREA = 101 4.3 M 16.8 JOINTS 72 M TOTAL ITEM 407.01 =
ITEM 14646.10 MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAYS DELINEATORS (STARS) TOTAL LENGTH = 36471 M M MM JOINTS M 36,596 M TOTAL ITEM 14646.10 = 36471 M
ITEM 502.9110 CONSTRUCTING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537.192 WIDTH = 12.2 NO. JOINTS 2.0 19074 TOTAL LENG SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = NO. JOINTS = TOTAL LENGTH =
M MM JOINTS M
M MM JOINTS M
INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 M WIDTH = 4.3 MM NO. JOINTS 0.0 JOINTS 0M TOTAL LENG NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 4.3 NO. JOINTS 0.0 0 TOTAL LENG
M MM JOINTS M 35,766 M
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION PCC PAVEMENT FUTURE TREATMENT: SEALING JOINTS
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 55207 M 55,207 M
FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION PCC TRAVEL LANES W/ HMA SHOULDERS FUTURE TREATMENT: SEALING JOINTS
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 36596 M 36,596 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 72237 M 72,237 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT TOTAL LENGTH = TOTAL ITEM 18402.7601 = 35766 M 35,766 M
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PCCEstBackup - 8,16,33,49 YR
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH/WIDTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION FUTURE TREATMENT COST: CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR)
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 25) PCC AREA = 331342 SM PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPAIR = 3.15 % TOTAL AREA = 10437 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 10,437 SM
FULL DEPTH PCC RECONSTRUCTION (ASPHALT SHOULDERS) FUTURE TREATMENT COST: CONCRETE PAVEMENT RESTORATION (CPR)
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 25) PCC AREA = 219577 SM PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPA 3.15 % TOTAL AREA = 6917 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 6,917 SM
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 41) PAVEMENT AREA = 331342 SM 6.3 % PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPAIR = TOTAL AREA = 20875 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 20,875 SM
ITEM 18502.4120 PCC PAVEMENT PARTIAL DEPTH REPAIRS USING CLASS D CONCRETE - SAWCUTTING METHOD (YEAR 41) PAVEMENT AREA = 219577 SM PERCENTAGE REQUIRING REPA 6.3 % TOTAL AREA = 13833 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.4120 = 13,833 SM
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 25) NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 2981 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 44 EA LONGITUDINAL NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 59 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 22 EA NO. DOWELS = 132434 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 3.15 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 4,172 EA
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 25) NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 2981 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 22 EA NO. TRANSVERSE JOINTS = 59 EA NO. DOWELS/JOINT = 22 EA NO. DOWELS = 66862 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 3.15 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 2,106 EA
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 41) NO. DOWELS = 132434 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 6.30 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 8,343 EA
ITEM 18502.7001 RETROFIT DOWELS IN PCC PAVEMENT (DBR) (YEAR 41) NO. DOWELS = 66862 EA PERCENT REPAIR = 6.30 % TOTAL ITEM 18502.7001 = 4,212 EA
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 55207 M
ITEM 18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT, 6M PAVEMENT SLABS - SILICONE SEALANT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 36596 M
55,207 M
36,596 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 72237 M
ITEM 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PCC PAVEMENT ASSUME ALL JOINTS ARE SEALED TOTAL LENGTH = 35766 M
72,237 M
35,766 M
ITEM 18502.8201 FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL PAVEMENT AREA = 331342 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.8201 = 331,342 SM
ITEM 18502.8201 FULL DIAMOND GRINDING OF PCC PAVEMENT WITH SLURRY REMOVAL PAVEMENT AREA = 219577 SM TOTAL ITEM 18502.8201 = 219,577 SM
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PCCEstBackup - CPR
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = RAMP LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
FULL DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION FUTURE TREATMENT COST: MILL & TWO COURSE SHLDR OVERLAY, 75mm AC
ITEM 402.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 AREA = 133482 DEPTH = 75 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 10011 TONNAGE 24057 TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 = SM MM CM MT 24,057 MT
ITEM 407.01 TACK COAT TOTAL AREA = 2 APPL FOR TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 407.01 =
ITEM 490.10 PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE AREA = 133482 SM TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 = 133,482 SM
ITEM 14646.10 MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAYS DELINEATORS (STARS) TOTAL LENGTH = 36471 M TOTAL ITEM 14646.10 = 36471 M
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PCCEstBackup - 20,45 YR
1/20/2006
Appendix F
Engineers Cost Estimate Full-Depth Precast Portland Cement Concrete
FIGURE IV LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS RECONSTRUCTION WITH FULL DEPTH PRECAST PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC) SLABS
ITEM NO. RECONSTRUCT 250mm PRECAST PCC SLABS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS MILL & INLAY ASPHALT SHOULDERS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS MILL & INLAY ASPHALT SHOULDERS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS SEAL LONGITUNDINAL & TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS SUB-TOTAL = SALVAGE VALUE Mill & Inlay Asphalt Shoulders, 15-year salvage value Seal Longitudinal & Transverse Joints, 6-year salvage value Cleaning & Filling Pavement/Shoulder Joints, 1-year salvage value TOTAL = $ 86,952,044 $ 0 8 16 17 19 21 23 24 25 27 29 31 32 33 37 39 40 41 43 45 45 47 48 49 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 73,798,142 477,967 477,967 359,685 359,685 359,685 359,685 477,967 2,445,410 359,685 359,685 359,685 477,967 359,685 359,685 359,685 477,967 359,685 359,685 2,445,410 359,685 359,685 477,967 359,685 1.0000 0.7307 0.5339 0.5134 0.4746 0.4388 0.4057 0.3901 0.3751 0.3468 0.3207 0.2965 0.2851 0.2741 0.2343 0.2166 0.2083 0.2003 0.1852 0.1712 0.1712 0.1583 0.1522 0.1463 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 73,798,142 349,250 255,186 184,662 170,707 157,830 145,924 186,455 917,273 124,739 115,351 106,647 136,268 98,590 84,274 77,908 99,560 72,045 66,614 418,654 61,578 56,938 72,747 52,622 77,809,966
DESCRIPTION
PWF (P/F,4%,n)
18502.7401 18502.7401 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18502.7401 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18502.7401 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18502.7401 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18633.08 18502.7401 18633.08
50 50 50
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\COST ESTIMATES
1/20/2006
PRECAST PCC RECONSTRUCTION ITEM # 203.02 304.11 402.010901 402.010911 402.377901 402.377911 402.197901 402.197911 402.127201 402.127211 407.01 14646.10 DESCRIPTION PRECAST CONCRETE SLABS UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL SUBBASE TYPE 1 ASPHALT TREATED PERMEABLE BASE COURSE PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO SUPERPAVE HMA 37.5mm PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO SUPERPAVE HMA 19.0mm PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO TACK COAT MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS UNITS SM CM CM MT QU MT QU MT QU MT QU L M QUANTITY 197860 188767 99403 32076 1604 40095 2005 24057 1203 16038 802 48054 36471 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ COST 215.00 20.00 35.00 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 65.00 40.00 2.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 42,539,912.74 3,775,345.24 3,479,093.44 2,084,924.81 64,151.53 2,606,156.01 80,189.42 1,563,693.61 48,113.65 1,042,462.40 32,075.77 96,107.16 18,235.27 57,430,461.05
TOTAL ITEM COST OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 9% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, AND 48 YEARS ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNITS M M QUANTITY 36596 35766 $ $ COST 7.00 3.00 $ $ TOTAL 256,173.47 107,299.35
18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PA 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE P
363,472.82
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 29,077.83 14,538.91 27,260.46 43,616.74 114,493.94 477,966.76
Page 1 of 2
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 8, 16, 33, AND 49 YEARS RESEALING ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNITS M M QUANTITY 36596 35766 $ $ COST 7.00 3.00 $ $ TOTAL
JOINT
18502.702002 RESEALING TRANSVERSE JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PA 18502.7401 RESEALING LONGITUDINAL JOINTS IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE P
256,173.47 107,299.35
363,472.82
OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% OVERHEAD COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 29,077.83 14,538.91 27,260.46 43,616.74 114,493.94 477,966.76
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 17, 19, 22, 24, 27, 29, 31, 33, 37, 39, 41, 43, 47, AND 49 YEARS CLEANING & FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS ITEM # 18633.08 DESCRIPTION CLEANING AND FILLING PAVEMENT/SHOULDER JOINTS UNITS M QUANTITY 36470 $ COST 7.50 $ TOTAL 273,525.00
TOTAL ITEM COST = OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
273,525.00
$ $ $ $ $ $
FUTURE TREATMENT COST AFTER 20 & 45 YEARS MILL & INLAY ASPHALT SHOULDERS ITEM # 402.127201 402.127211 407.01 490.10 14646.10 DESCRIPTION SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5mm F2 PLANT PRODUCTION QUALITY ADJUSTMENT TO ITEM 402.127201 TACK COAT PRODUCTION COLD MILLING OF BITUMINOUS CONCRETE MILLED IN AUDIBLE ROADWAY DELINEATORS UNITS MT QU L SM M QUANTITY 24057 1203 48053 133482 36471 $ $ $ $ $ COST 65.00 40.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL 1,563,689.83 48,113.53 96,106.93 133,481.85 18,235.27
TOTAL ITEM COST = OVERHEAD FACTORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, 8% MOBILIZATION, 4% M&PT, 7.5% CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, 12% TOTAL OVERHEAD COST TOTAL COST FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS
1,859,627.42
$ $ $ $ $ $
Page 2 of 2
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
MM MM MM MM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
188767 CM
ITEM 304.11 SUBBASE TYPE II NORTHBOUND LENGTH = 9537.192 WIDTH = 18.3 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 52359 INTERCHANGE 23 NB EXIT RAMP LENGTH = 91 WIDTH = 11.6 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 318 NB ENTRANCE RAMP LENGTH = 160.0 WIDTH = 11.6 DEPTH = 300 VOLUME = 556 SOUTHBOUND LENGTH = WIDTH = DEPTH = VOLUME =
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
M M MM CM
TOTAL ASPHALT AREA = TOTAL CONCRETE AREA = TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 304.11 =
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PrecastEstBackup - 203.02-304.11
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
AC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = BINDER = BASE = PERM. BASE = SUBBASE = TOTAL= TACK COAT FACTOR = ASPHALT FACTOR =
MM MM MM MM MM MM
PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH TOP = 325 MM PERM. BA 100 MM SUBBASE 300 MM TOTAL= 725 MM
ITEM 18403.377901 SUPERPAVE HMA 37.5MM AREA = 133482 DEPTH = 125 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 16685.2717 TONNAGE= 40095 TOTAL ITEM 18403.377902 =
SM MM CM MT 40095 MT
ITEM 18403.197901 SUPERPAVE HMA 19.0MM AREA = 133482 DEPTH = 75 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 10011.163 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 24057 TOTAL ITEM 18403.197902 =
SM MM CM MT 24057 MT
ITEM 18403.127201 SUPERPAVE HMA 12.5MM AREA = 133482 DEPTH = 50 TOTAL = AREA X DEPTH = 6674 TOTAL = CM*2.414MT/CM = 16038 TOTAL ITEM 18403.127202 =
SM MM CM MT 16038 MT
ITEM 407.01 TACK COAT TOTAL AREA = 2 APPL FOR TOTAL AREA = TOTAL ITEM 407.01 =
1/20/2006
NORTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = SOUTHBOUND MAINLINE LENGTH = EXISTING MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = EXISTING SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED MAINLINE LANE WIDTH = PROPOSED SHOULDER WIDTH = PROPOSED RAMP WIDTH =
M M M M M M M
MM MM MM MM
U:\12714\Data\PavementEval\PrecastEstBackup - PCC
1/20/2006