Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Non Allopathic (Non Conventional) Therapies in Medical Practice Draft Policy (Formerly, Complementary Medicine) Consultation
Non Allopathic (Non Conventional) Therapies in Medical Practice Draft Policy (Formerly, Complementary Medicine) Consultation
Non Allopathic (Non Conventional) Therapies in Medical Practice Draft Policy (Formerly, Complementary Medicine) Consultation
11. Moreinformationfollows,including: BriefBackground ProcessUsedinDevelopingtheRevisedDraftPolicy KeyFeaturesoftheRevisedDraftPolicy NextSteps HaveYourSay SeeRevisedDraftPolicyhere BriefBackground TheCollegesComplementaryMedicinepolicyiscurrentlyunderreviewinaccordance withourregularpolicyreviewprocess.Thepolicywasoriginallydevelopedinthe mid1990s,andarticulatedbroadstatementsofexpectationfortheprofessionrelated tothreecorecomponents:assessingpatients,treatingpatients,andadvancing knowledge. SincethedevelopmentoftheComplementaryMedicinepolicy,theenvironmenthas changedsignificantly.Thepopularityofnonallopathictherapiesamongstpatientshas increasedandthetypeofavailabletherapieshasincreased.Nonallopathictherapies arebeingprovidedbyabroadrangeofindividuals:physicians,otherregulated professionals,andsomeunregulatedprofessionals,andnewregulatoryCollegeshave beenformedforNaturopathy,HomeopathyandTraditionalChineseMedicineand Acupuncture.
ProcessUsedinDevelopingtheRevisedDraftPolicy AWorkingGroup,composedofbothphysicianandpublicmembersofCouncil,was strucktoreviewtheComplementaryMedicinepolicy.Anumberofpreliminarysteps wereundertakenbytheWorkingGrouptoensureitwasinformedofthepertinent issuesandhadengagedwithrelevantstakeholders,by: Invitingstakeholderstopresenttheircommentsontheexistingpolicyandonthe fieldofcomplementarymedicineataWorkingGroupmeetinginthespringof2010; Holdingapreliminaryconsultationontheexistingpolicyoverthespringand summerof2010; Conductingapublicopinionsurveyonrelatedissues; ReviewingtherelatedpoliciesandpositionsofCanadianandinternational jurisdictions; Researchingarangeoftopics,includingevidencebasedmedicineandpatientuseof therapies. Throughthepolicyreviewprocess,theWorkingGrouphasalsocriticallyassessedthe existingpolicy.Itconsideredwhetherthepolicywassufficientlycomprehensiveor whetheritshouldaddressotherphysicianrolesbeyondthedirectprovisionofnon allopathictherapies.Inaddition,theWorkingGroupconsideredwhetherthe expectationsintheexistingpolicycouldbemadeclearerforphysicians,andwhether policyrevisionscouldbemadetohelppreventpatientharm. Aftercarefulconsiderationofalltheinformation,feedback,andresearchgathered duringtheearlystagesofthepolicyreviewprocess,theWorkingGrouphasdeveloped thereviseddraftpolicy,NonAllopathic(NonConventional)TherapiesinMedical Practice,whichhasbeenapprovedforexternalconsultation. KeyFeaturesoftheRevisedDraftPolicy TheCollegesupportspatientchoiceinsettingtreatmentgoalsandinmakinghealth caredecisions,andhasnointentionorinterestindeprivingpatientsofnon allopathictherapiesthataresafeandeffective.Asamedicalregulator,theCollege does,however,haveadutytoprotectthepublicfromharm. Thus,theobjectofthisdraftpolicyistopreventunsafeorineffectivenonallopathic therapiesfrombeingprovidedbyphysicians,andtoprohibitunprofessionalor unethicalphysicianconductinrelationtothesetherapies. Differentoperativetermshavebeenadoptedthatweredeemedtobevalueneutral: Allopathicmedicinereferstotraditionalorconventionalmedicine(astaughtin medicalschools)andnonallopathictherapiesrefertocomplementaryor alternativemedicine.
Thedraftpolicyappliestophysicianswhoprovidenonallopathictherapies; physicianswhosepatientspursuenonallopathictherapies;andphysicianswhoform professionalaffiliationswithnonallopathicclinics,therapies,ordevices. Thedraftpolicyisfoundedonthegeneralpropositionthatthetenetsofgood medicalpracticeapplytoallopathicandnonallopathiccareequally. Thedraftpolicysetsmoreexplicitexpectationsofphysiciansandgreaterprotections ofpatients,by: o Explicitlyprohibitingtheexploitationofpatients; o Requiringthatclinicalassessmentsanddiagnosesmeetthestandardsof allopathicmedicine; o Requiringareasonableconnectionbetweenthepatientsconditionand thediagnosisANDbetweenthediagnosisandthetherapeuticoption proposed; o Explicitlystatingthatpatientconsentwillnotdischargethesumtotalof physiciansobligationswhenrecommendingtherapeuticoptions; o Requiringthattherapeuticoptionsmusthaveareasonablerisk/benefit analysis,reasonableexpectationsofefficacysupportedbyevidence,and takeintoaccountthepatientssocialeconomicstatus; o Prohibitingphysiciansfrominflatingorexaggeratingtheexpected outcomefromnonallopathictherapiesorfrommisrepresentingthe benefitsofallopathiccare. NextSteps TheWorkingGroupisseekingfeedbackfromtheprofession,thepublicandother stakeholdersonthereviseddraftpolicy.Yourfeedbackwillhelpustoassessthedraft policybeforeitisfinalizedbyCouncil.Toensuretransparencyandencourageopen dialogue,thefeedbackwereceiveispostedonourwebsiteinaccordancewithour postingguidelines.Seepostingguidelines. AllofthefeedbackreceivedwillbereviewedbytheWorkingGroup,theColleges ExecutiveCommitteeandCouncilbeforemakinganydecisionsaboutwhatisincludedin thefinalversionofthepolicy.Allfeedbackiscarefullyconsidered,eventhatwhichisnot reflectedinthefinalpolicy.Whenfinalizingthepolicycontent,theCollegewillconsider theextenttowhichyoursuggestionsorcommentsrepresenttheexpectationsofthe profession,andareconsistentwithourmandateasamedicalregulator. HaveYourSay CompleteaBriefSurvey AND/OR Email:ComplementaryMedicine@cpso.on.ca