Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD " PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313, Israel; jz12345@earthlink.net ; 91313 " 04413,

Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik DN: cn=Joseph Zernik, o, ou, email=jz12345@e arthlink.net, c=US Date: 2011.07.31 09:17:13 +03'00'

11-07-31 PRESS RELEASE: Request filed with State Comptroller, Attorney General for criminal investigation of Justice Yoram Danziger, Clerk Guy Shani, relative to Conduct of the Appeal in Moshe Katzav v State of Israel
Obstruction/perversion of justice was alleged, relative to the online publication of a simulated order to postpone the prison sentence of former president Moshe Katzav.

Justice Yoram Danziger

Clerk Guy Shani

Jerusalem, July 31 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has filed a request with State Comptroller and Ombudsman Justice Micha Lindenstrauss and Attorney General Yehudah Weinstein for criminal investigation of Supreme Court Justice Yoram Danziger and Clerk Guy Shani, relative to their conduct in the appeal of Moshe Katzav v State of Israel. [1]
Alleged Perversion/Obstruction of Justice through the online publication of a simulated order to postpone the prison sentence of Moshe Katzav

The request pertains to conduct of Justice Yoram Danziger and Clerk Guy Shani in the Appeal of Moshe Katzav v State of Israel and the online publication of an alleged simulated order to postpone the prison sentence of the former president. [2] The request followed the publication of news of pending decision by office of the Attorney General relative to interrogation of Justice Danziger under caution in an unrelated matter. [3]
State Ombudsman was previously asked to audit the same matter

On July 27, 2011, Dr Zernik requested an audit by the State Ombudsman relative to the legality of the postponement of the execution of the prison sentence, as part of the Appeal in Moshe Katzav v State of Israel, [4] where: a) The Supreme Court denies access to valid records of decisions of the Court, and b) The Ministry of Justice has failed so far to produce copies of relevant Court decisions, as served on the Prosecution, which were requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. The concerns, as stated in the request, pertaining in this matter are that: a) While an unsigned order was published online by the Supreme Court, there is no

July 31, 2011

2/2

direct evidence that a valid, signed and certified order in this matter has been entered and served by the Court, and
b) The Ministry of Justice has failed to execute the sentence of the Tel Aviv District Court with no valid legal authority. The office of the State Comptroller and the Attorney General have been asked to consider the requests as part of the dialogue with authorities of the State of Israel, which is required as part of the protocol of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in Israel by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations. The next UPR of Human Rights in Israel is scheduled for 2012. Both offices have also been asked to provide a response within 30 days.
The matter to be presented in the 16th World Criminology Congress in Kobe, Japan

The conduct of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel in the matter of Moshe Katzav v State of Israel is also part of the presentation of Dr Zernik in the 16th World Criminology Congress, opening next week in Kobe, Japan. [5] Dr Zernik claims that conditions, which have emerged in the courts of the State of Israel, following implementation of invalid electronic record systems in the courts pose a serious risk to both Human Rights and Banking Regulation. _______
Joseph Zernik, PhD The writer has gained substantial experience in recent years in analyzing fraud in the electronic records of the state and US courts. His opinions on these matters were supported by official report of the UN Human Rights Council, by the opinions of highly-reputed law enforcement and computer science experts, and by peer-review in international computer and criminology journals and conferences. Submission he authored on behalf of Human Rights Alert (NGO) for the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the official 2010 UPR report with reference to corruption of the courts and the legal profession [6] http://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam

LINKS: [1] 11-07-31 Request filed with State Ombudsman, Attorney General for Criminal Investigation of Supreme Court Justice Yoram Danziger, Clerk Guy Shani s http://www.scribd.com/doc/61291260/ [2] "Simulated Order" here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows: Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or (2) cause another to: (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document. (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. [3] 11-07-31 Attorney General Deciding Whether to Quiz Supreme Court Justice Yoram Danziger Under Caution_Haaretz http://www.scribd.com/doc/61288811/ [4] 11-07-27 Request for Audit by the State Comptroller and Ombudsman of validity of records in the Appeal Katzav v State of Israel, and legality of the electronic case management and public access systems of the courts http://www.scribd.com/doc/61022580/ [5] 11-07-29 16th World Criminology Congress: Invalid Electronic Record Systems in the Israeli Supreme Court _ presentation by Human Rights Alert (NGO) s http://www.scribd.com/doc/61199681/ [6] 11-07-04 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch (Eng)

/http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113